If I need a book to understand this (being it JAVA or SNOBOL it doesn't matter), the first 200 pages will be about information technology. Another 200 pages are needed for the basics of computer science and finally the remaining 200 pages are for JAVA.
Hmmm... sounds quite strange. There is plenty of experimental evidences of the quantum theory both very simple and rather complex. And there is a number of everyday things that work thanks to the QT, starting with our beloved PC we are all using right now!
It would be very interesting to see the experimental tests that confirm this new theory and negate the old one. And explain why my PC is still working. (Easy: I don't use Windows!)
Seems a not-so-smart thing, at least at first glance.
For users: they will spend more money by printing the pages at home, unless they will read only by screen. Very unconfortable if you like to read while in the bathroom... in the bathtub I mean:-)
For the company: I see people trading the book pages in order to gather the whole book and paying just few pages... if any.
Later I can also see the rise of issues with the DRM for books and magazines.
Finally, a lot more of wasted paper and empty ink cartridges (and dead trees) for badly printed books. Let's revert to the old faithful printed books. At least at the moment.
First of all I trust that whatever they think about that, there will always be a "DVD Jon" somewhere that will point the poor design of the schema/algorithm. The tighter they'll hold, the more they'll loose.
We only need to avoid those chips being installed into our brains in order to enforce the brohibition to tell our friends about the football match we looked at. We paid for one private view, not for a public performance!
In order to know more about this marvelous woofer, we'd need one of the following:
- a correct username and password
- the ability to type the correct hostname
- the assurance that the database server is running.
Or maybe that woofer needs some more bandwidth to really woof all of us!
(Read: slashdot effect)
No words about the text editor choice just like no words about your religion faith.
I don't like dig as well as the old-fashioned nslookup because of the tight coupling with BIND. I prefer the independent host (read chap.3), an historical DNS tool.
Finally, if I'd need to do some tests in TCP/UDP I'd choose either netcat or GNU-netcat.
Of course there is no perefect choice in a absolute sense. I simply have found these tools more effective than the other ones.
We all hope that within 2010 there will be a switching/routing product with enough power to handle such a fast link
I fear that as of today even the fastest links between RAM and CPUs are not enoufh for that!
So that Japanease company is now to partner with someone to investigate/study/implement such an I/O monster!
I'm liable for bugs in my software.
I'm not liable if my patches fail to patch the bug.
I'm not liable if my patches make more damages than the pathced bug.
If I do the same in restaurant business I get jailed!
It would be great at least a "pay after use", just like pizza: do you use to pay for pizza after or before you ate it?
Well, techies don't care about statistics, they care about the meat.
Bit managers very often care about statistics and give money to techies and get money from the market accordingly to statistics.
If my considerations are real, that statistics company could cheat!
Apache people seem to be techies.
#1. Sites vs servers. Netcraft states they count the sites while they don't mention whether they count 2nd level domains (foo.com), 3rd level domains (www.foo.com, support.foo.com) or what else. They just say they "received responses from 74,409,971 sites" while not defining what a site actually is.
#2. Growth. There has been a growth of about 3.73% in the number of (so called) web sites. There must be some hidden winner(s). That is, there must be some group of web servers that is getting the great part of the growth all at once! Netcraft is failing to mention who they are!
#3. Webserver (or website) identification. It's all but trivial to identify web servers. Are they using some special tool like amap and nmap or just looking at the server response content? How accurate this identification can be?
The point here should not be free speech. The constitution (with some minor exceptions) will grant us that. Would you feel safe if anyone could chat with your younger sons? Having a blog can expose your identity and your internet presence to anyone. Younger people (but not only them) can be easily nobbled by older and more experienced people. You can read about the results in everyday newspaper. Shutting down their blogs may not be the right move. Not at all actually. But something is to be done definitely. Instead of talking about religion parties being more or less stupid, it could be great is someone of us could come out with some better idea to protect our sons!
We all hope that Philips will speed the technology up. Wider screens means also heavier batteries and bulkier carrying bags! And also more fragile devices!
I don't have all these details. For sure there must be a place somewhere in the device where the contents is to be clear text. Even if the TV set were able to handle scrabled signals, the clear text point would be there inside (just before the CRT/LCD) instead of the DVD player!
Public VoIP security issues are more or less the same as in the plain old public telephone service.
If someone really cares about security (and "privacy") issues, she will provide for her own private VoIP service.
Very few people knows whether the communication will travel safely through the net and related servers.
Yes, my link to my favourite VoIP carrier is encrypted with a zillion bits encryption key. And what happens after?
The solution is to avoid using public services for security and privacy concerned communications. There is very little to do if you dictate your credit card numbers by phone, whatever technology you use!
There can be a number of weak rings in the chain. Somewhere into the DVD player the content gets unencrypted: there you can copy it with, at worst, some soldering skills. Somewhere the content is completely clear text before being encrypted: someone working there could access and copy it. Movie and music companies can loose more money because of product quality than piracy. And becuase of high investments in screener encryption!
We all hope in a better rivalry between Andy and Linus. They are both great minds: there can be much more value in their cooperation than in falming each other!
Uh.. 20 years ago, you probably had it. My VIC-20 took less than a second from powerup to the READY prompt. My Amiga 500 was slower, but still a lot faster than anything modern. My Amiga 3000 was even slower, because I had it do more. My 5-year-old Linux boxes are even slower to boot than that.
My solar powered desk calculator needs half a second to boot, while my desk lamp shows a zero seconds boot.
And it takes 15 to 20 minutes for me to be ready in the morning. Maybe the rule is: the more complex the OS, the longer the boot!
Slashdot Mirror
If I need a book to understand this (being it JAVA or SNOBOL it doesn't matter), the first 200 pages will be about information technology.
Another 200 pages are needed for the basics of computer science and finally the remaining 200 pages are for JAVA.
Hmmm ... sounds quite strange.
There is plenty of experimental evidences of the quantum theory both very simple and rather complex.
And there is a number of everyday things that work thanks to the QT, starting with our beloved PC we are all using right now!
It would be very interesting to see the experimental tests that confirm this new theory and negate the old one.
And explain why my PC is still working. (Easy: I don't use Windows!)
Seems a not-so-smart thing, at least at first glance. ... in the bathtub I mean :-) ... if any.
For users: they will spend more money by printing the pages at home, unless they will read only by screen. Very unconfortable if you like to read while in the bathroom
For the company: I see people trading the book pages in order to gather the whole book and paying just few pages
Later I can also see the rise of issues with the DRM for books and magazines.
Finally, a lot more of wasted paper and empty ink cartridges (and dead trees) for badly printed books.
Let's revert to the old faithful printed books. At least at the moment.
The solution could be quantum computers
They should be less power hungry and less power means (also) less heat.
Menomale che ci sono persone istruite come te che provvedono a tappare la bocca a noi ignoranti.
Grazie.
Yes I did. But I'm not anglophone and never listened to the exact sentence in English!
Thanks a real lot!
First of all I trust that whatever they think about that, there will always be a "DVD Jon" somewhere that will point the poor design of the schema/algorithm. The tighter they'll hold, the more they'll loose.
We only need to avoid those chips being installed into our brains in order to enforce the brohibition to tell our friends about the football match we looked at. We paid for one private view, not for a public performance!
In order to know more about this marvelous woofer, we'd need one of the following:
- a correct username and password
- the ability to type the correct hostname
- the assurance that the database server is running.
Or maybe that woofer needs some more bandwidth to really woof all of us!
(Read: slashdot effect)
No words about the text editor choice just like no words about your religion faith.
I don't like dig as well as the old-fashioned nslookup because of the tight coupling with BIND. I prefer the independent host (read chap.3), an historical DNS tool.
Finally, if I'd need to do some tests in TCP/UDP I'd choose either netcat or GNU-netcat.
Of course there is no perefect choice in a absolute sense. I simply have found these tools more effective than the other ones.
It seems that Microsoft operating systems are getting closer to real world needs.
I wonder how did those engineers got this mind blasting idea!
We all hope that within 2010 there will be a switching/routing product with enough power to handle such a fast link
I fear that as of today even the fastest links between RAM and CPUs are not enoufh for that!
So that Japanease company is now to partner with someone to investigate/study/implement such an I/O monster!
I'm liable for bugs in my software.
I'm not liable if my patches fail to patch the bug.
I'm not liable if my patches make more damages than the pathced bug.
If I do the same in restaurant business I get jailed!
It would be great at least a "pay after use", just like pizza: do you use to pay for pizza after or before you ate it?
So finally we know what William wishes for his 50th birthday.
Hey guys, we need to collect some more dimes for the gift!
Well, techies don't care about statistics, they care about the meat.
Bit managers very often care about statistics and give money to techies and get money from the market accordingly to statistics.
If my considerations are real, that statistics company could cheat!
Apache people seem to be techies.
#1. Sites vs servers.
Netcraft states they count the sites while they don't mention whether they count 2nd level domains (foo.com), 3rd level domains (www.foo.com, support.foo.com) or what else. They just say they "received responses from 74,409,971 sites" while not defining what a site actually is.
#2. Growth.
There has been a growth of about 3.73% in the number of (so called) web sites. There must be some hidden winner(s). That is, there must be some group of web servers that is getting the great part of the growth all at once! Netcraft is failing to mention who they are!
#3. Webserver (or website) identification.
It's all but trivial to identify web servers. Are they using some special tool like amap and nmap or just looking at the server response content? How accurate this identification can be?
The point here should not be free speech. The constitution (with some minor exceptions) will grant us that.
Would you feel safe if anyone could chat with your younger sons?
Having a blog can expose your identity and your internet presence to anyone.
Younger people (but not only them) can be easily nobbled by older and more experienced people. You can read about the results in everyday newspaper.
Shutting down their blogs may not be the right move. Not at all actually. But something is to be done definitely.
Instead of talking about religion parties being more or less stupid, it could be great is someone of us could come out with some better idea to protect our sons!
We all hope that Philips will speed the technology up.
Wider screens means also heavier batteries and bulkier carrying bags!
And also more fragile devices!
I don't have all these details. For sure there must be a place somewhere in the device where the contents is to be clear text.
Even if the TV set were able to handle scrabled signals, the clear text point would be there inside (just before the CRT/LCD) instead of the DVD player!
Public VoIP security issues are more or less the same as in the plain old public telephone service.
If someone really cares about security (and "privacy") issues, she will provide for her own private VoIP service.
Very few people knows whether the communication will travel safely through the net and related servers.
Yes, my link to my favourite VoIP carrier is encrypted with a zillion bits encryption key. And what happens after?
The solution is to avoid using public services for security and privacy concerned communications.
There is very little to do if you dictate your credit card numbers by phone, whatever technology you use!
There can be a number of weak rings in the chain.
Somewhere into the DVD player the content gets unencrypted: there you can copy it with, at worst, some soldering skills.
Somewhere the content is completely clear text before being encrypted: someone working there could access and copy it.
Movie and music companies can loose more money because of product quality than piracy. And becuase of high investments in screener encryption!
We all hope in a better rivalry between Andy and Linus.
They are both great minds: there can be much more value in their cooperation than in falming each other!
Thanks: it is so difficlut to find careful people! :-)
I type as I live: fats and with lost of erorrs!
And it takes 15 to 20 minutes for me to be ready in the morning.
Maybe the rule is: the more complex the OS, the longer the boot!
Gates is also donating a copy of all his software products.
Infact their bugs has made the history as well as their poorly engineered solutions!