Why do you need two different subnets served by DHCP? Keep in mind that DHCP clients can't specify which subnet it needs an address from.
If you have the shared server handing out addresses from 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.1.0.0/24, you'll end up with clients randomly assigned from both subnets.
(I'm not sure if DHCPd will serve out of one network until it's exhausted, or round robin.)
If your problem is that the original subnet is too small and you're unable to simply subtract a bit from your subnet mask due to other routing constraints, this will fix it. But keep in mind that one machine will have to be routed to another machine on the same LAN via the router. If you're trying to keep two discrete networks on the same LAN with some sort of order as to which machine is in which, you can't do it this way.
(dhcp helper addresses are how you configure multiple subnets to be served from a single server, but this isn't going to work when the DHCP server is on the same segment as your multiple subnets.)
The issue here is that you've got a 4G ipod that doesn't have any scratches. I've got a PSP with no scratches on it. I've got an orange with no scratches on it. It's not quite the same thing.
The nano is ridiculously suceptible to scratches- if you don't have one, I don't think you quite realize the degree. It's not a matter of mistreatment or throwing it into an enclosed pocket or bag with a bunch of sharp materials- anything that's tougher than a cloth lens cleaner seems to mar the surface of the nano.
It almost seems like a bizarre plot by Apple to ensure that there ARE no protective devices for the Nano. Their secrecy surrounding the design ensures that no third party will be able to produce anything in a quick manner- allowing the nano to have a month totally exposed to the elements, at which point I'm almost wondering if Apple just figured the Fanboys would buy another one.
(The only device I've been seen available for purchase are the armbands, of which I'm not a big fan.) The Nano tubes simply haven't been available since Day 1. The crystal overlay protectors are theoretically on their way, but I haven't seen them yet.
Ralph's not necessarily claiming credit he didn't deserve- He's claiming (as I understand it) to be the person that brought videogames as a commodity to the home market. Ralph is truly one of the great engineering minds of the late 20th century- the stuff he designed, from Simon to games over cable, is pretty phenomenal.
Meanwhile, Nolan Bushnell is the one livin' large with his hookers and blow, while his main talent is packaging and commodifying. Nolan seems to have recognized a bunch of good ideas and just kine of bundled them together in one consumer-friendly package. His engineering skills would appear to be relatively limited. Bushnell is the Jobs to Baer's Wozniak.
Baer strikes me as a very straightlaced guy that's down with the establishment, a true company man. In the early 70s he comes up with (unarguably) fantastic ideas and fights his damndest to get them to market, with limited success. Suddenly this damn hippie comes along, (possibly) swipes one of his ideas, and becomes the hottest personality in America. I can see how this would still just a sore point with Ralph.
The man that put most of the technological genius behind the electonic revolution is forced to play second fiddle to a marketing guy. This is certainly a theme that most/. readers can have some sympathy with.
Sidebars:
I've played a few games on Ralph Baer's original prototype Brown Box- against Ralph himself. The man plays a mean game of pong (or whatever it was he called it.) Playing on that system was truly one of the holy grails of video game geekdom.
And as much as I appreciate everything that Ralph does, and recognize his contributions to the industry with respect to Mr. Bushnell, I have to admit that I named one of my sons Nolan.
Slashdot Mirror
Why do you need two different subnets served by DHCP? Keep in mind that DHCP clients can't specify which subnet it needs an address from. If you have the shared server handing out addresses from 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.1.0.0/24, you'll end up with clients randomly assigned from both subnets. (I'm not sure if DHCPd will serve out of one network until it's exhausted, or round robin.) If your problem is that the original subnet is too small and you're unable to simply subtract a bit from your subnet mask due to other routing constraints, this will fix it. But keep in mind that one machine will have to be routed to another machine on the same LAN via the router. If you're trying to keep two discrete networks on the same LAN with some sort of order as to which machine is in which, you can't do it this way. (dhcp helper addresses are how you configure multiple subnets to be served from a single server, but this isn't going to work when the DHCP server is on the same segment as your multiple subnets.)
The issue here is that you've got a 4G ipod that doesn't have any scratches. I've got a PSP with no scratches on it. I've got an orange with no scratches on it. It's not quite the same thing. The nano is ridiculously suceptible to scratches- if you don't have one, I don't think you quite realize the degree. It's not a matter of mistreatment or throwing it into an enclosed pocket or bag with a bunch of sharp materials- anything that's tougher than a cloth lens cleaner seems to mar the surface of the nano.
It almost seems like a bizarre plot by Apple to ensure that there ARE no protective devices for the Nano. Their secrecy surrounding the design ensures that no third party will be able to produce anything in a quick manner- allowing the nano to have a month totally exposed to the elements, at which point I'm almost wondering if Apple just figured the Fanboys would buy another one. (The only device I've been seen available for purchase are the armbands, of which I'm not a big fan.) The Nano tubes simply haven't been available since Day 1. The crystal overlay protectors are theoretically on their way, but I haven't seen them yet.
Meanwhile, Nolan Bushnell is the one livin' large with his hookers and blow, while his main talent is packaging and commodifying. Nolan seems to have recognized a bunch of good ideas and just kine of bundled them together in one consumer-friendly package. His engineering skills would appear to be relatively limited. Bushnell is the Jobs to Baer's Wozniak.
Baer strikes me as a very straightlaced guy that's down with the establishment, a true company man. In the early 70s he comes up with (unarguably) fantastic ideas and fights his damndest to get them to market, with limited success. Suddenly this damn hippie comes along, (possibly) swipes one of his ideas, and becomes the hottest personality in America. I can see how this would still just a sore point with Ralph. The man that put most of the technological genius behind the electonic revolution is forced to play second fiddle to a marketing guy. This is certainly a theme that most /. readers can have some sympathy with.
Sidebars: I've played a few games on Ralph Baer's original prototype Brown Box- against Ralph himself. The man plays a mean game of pong (or whatever it was he called it.) Playing on that system was truly one of the holy grails of video game geekdom.
And as much as I appreciate everything that Ralph does, and recognize his contributions to the industry with respect to Mr. Bushnell, I have to admit that I named one of my sons Nolan.