FWIW I think ethanol along with many other alcohols can be vaporized without combusting. Personally I have done some kitchen chemistry with isopropanol. While evaporating it in a smallish room, it built up to a noticeable odor in the room and I think the buzz I got was a little more than placebo. Kinda like drinking the stuff, or huffing correction fluid or acetone. Not that I recommend doing any of this - but airborne delivery of alcohol seems plausible. probably would irritate the fuck out of your throat
The different leaders have different AI personalities - some just don't give up 'til the last man dies. Others may be willing to crack a deal. Montezuma is more likely to declare war on you than Gandhi, for example. I've played an unbelievable amount of Civ 5 over the past few years, and I'd say it's an 80/20 split in favor of the enemy surrendering if their army is wiped out and you have them surrounded.
I've seen *very* few games where other civs failed to expand. By 1500 AD even the slowest civs will have at least 3 or 4 cities founded. The only exception to this is if they have had their cities captured, or their neighboring civs simply claimed all the territory in the area and had the military power to defend it.
Which difficulty are you playing at? It sounds like it might be too easy and you need to bump it up another difficulty level. I play at 1 higher than the default. I go up to 2 higher if the risk of losing horribly that day doesn't bother me:)
Which version of the game are you playing? Early versions did have worse AI in many respects, but that was mostly resolved even before Gods and Kings came out.
Shouldn't world wonders *inherently* give tourism? Shouldn't religious buildings have a cultural impact as well? It's weird.
Many world wonders (and most national wonders) contain a Great Work slot, or even a slot pre-filled with a Great Work. If you are trying to win a tourism victory, it's difficult if you only rely on non-Wonder buildings to provide Great Work slots. Unless you have a large empire (6+ cities) you will run out of building-provided slots sooner than you'd like - then you're left with slots from Wonders.
FWIW there are also 1 or 2 wonders that directly give a tourism boost, not just great works slots.
There are also several religious buildings that provide a culture bonus. The Shrines and Temples don't, but once you or any other player found a religion, you can add religious tenets allowing you to purchase Mosques, Cathedrals, and I believe one other building. These advanced religious buildings [i]do[/i] increase culture, as well as giving +1 to faith and/or happiness depending on the building. Furthermore, they can only be purchased with faith, not gold or production. Not having to sacrifice gold or production is [i]very[/i] useful in the small empires you'd build trying for a tourism victory. True, you have to spend faith instead - but it's not a lot, and you should already have excess faith if you're taking this strategy.
How long ago did the domains expire? My experience is that on the expiration date, your domains get held in a renewal period of 30 days where you can renew it at normal price without any possibility of losing the domain. After that period is an additional 1 - 3 months where the domain is in a different status where the registrar still has control over it, but you need to pay an additional fee (often called "redemption fee") to renew it. If you don't pay this fee the registrar is free to auction the domain or otherwise sell it to someone else.
NameCheap's website contradicts your experience, stating that most domains with them have a redemption fee of $200 : https://www.namecheap.com/supp... I presume your domains had been expired for several months and had been fully released by the time you checked. $200 is actually on the high side, most registrars are closer to $80 for redemption fees.
Other sources: Personal experience registering domain names since 1998, and professional experience of several years working at a company that resells domain registrations.
Or, if an Indian or Chinese programmer take over your job (much more likely than the Singularity), then you can count on work being harder to find and pay being less.
In that situation, the woman hadn't committed any wrong against the man. Maybe didn't even know him. On the other hand, banks rape the people on a daily basis...
Not all - in fact the sure the majority of them don't do this. Besides Network Solutions, eNom, and a few others, many domain registration sites out there aren't fully-fledged registrars. Even if the only name you see in a WHOIS lookup is the company you directly paid for the registration, there's a good good chance they use another registrar on the back end. Essentially these companies are just resellers. They pay $6 or whatever for the domain, then charge you $12 for it. This means that even if you choose not to register, the domain, if they sneak-register it from under you, that does incur a monetary cost, making it unlikely.
I work for a domain reseller. Now, GoDaddy and Network Solutions may very well not have to pay anything for registration, so this tactic might be more useable for them. But for the company I work for, this tactic would be a financial loser.
As indicated in another reply, these requirements are for the *registrars* of the domain, not the *registrants*. What it means is that GoDaddy (or whoever your registrar is) will have a bit more work to do. Will they pass on the costs to end users? Maybe, but I doubt it's much. The end user might have a bit more difficulty entering fake contact information, since the registrars will be auditing that information better. Other than that there's no difference to the end user, at least from the things you quoted. IWAACTAADR. (I Work At A Company That's Also A Domain Registrar).
These "Domain management companies" you speak of are what I call "scammers". I've gotten similar notices in the mail, after registering my first domain. "Hey, your domain is expiring next year. Give the ownership to us and renew it for only $80 a year!" Of course, this letter fails to note the other option, which is leaving my domain where it's at and continuing to renew for $12 annually.
I can't fathom why anyone would want someone to "manage" their domain registrations, unless they have no clue what a domain registration actually is. This is how you manage it: You pick name. You type in your contact info, and optionally the name servers you want to use. You renew it annually. That's it. The most complicated thing you could ever do is trying to transfer it - which just means clicking the "Unlock" button on the registrar's site, getting the transfer key, and providing that to the new registrar. Way easier than doing taxes.
The only thing hard thing about it is that people don't understand domain registration is separate from DNS management and service hosting (web sites, for example). People commonly get the idea that all of these things are the same. If you have that conception, you're already on bad footing since you're trying to be webmaster and IT with zero skills.
The right thing for those guys to do isn't to succumb to the smooth talker who promises to make all the technical problems go away. (Then steal the domain.) If they don't or can't learn webmaster skills, they need to either (a) employ someone trustworthy who does, or (b) start *from the beginning* with an integrated registration/design/hosting service that takes care of everything end to end. It might seem cheaper to do it DIY in the beginning, but to successfully DIY you have to know how to DI first.
I haven't been working in web hosting quite as long as you, but I do have some thoughts on the matter, from dealing with these individuals on a daily basis.
Do you really think it's fair to call a 50 year old woman who wants a nice website for her cat-blog a moron?
Yes, if she expects to take on the role of webmaster and developer, with zero technical experience. I absolutely call that a moron. It's the equivalent of that same lady trying to build a kit car, which then loses a wheel and explodes rolling out of the driveway.
The right thing for her to do is find a qualified individual or company to create the site for her, if she wants that level of customization and control. Otherwise, she belongs on Blogger or Facebook, where she can post her cat pictures, but doesn't need technical skills beyond manipulating a GUI.
Carbon footprint is one thing, and that has global consequences. But the bigger toxicity of heavy metal mines and refining is from the *material itself*, and that contamination is more local. That is, if it's made in China, it stays (more) in China.
"The content of those directories could be downloaded, including directories containing sensitive data like password hashes"...
All the WordPress installations I've dealt with (quite a few, it's part of my job) had users' password hashes stored in a MySQL database. I wonder why the W3 plugin is writing them to the file system in the first place?
It is the same plant with the same genetics and the same active constituents (THC and friends). While there are different strains, it's like smoking a Camel vs. smoking a Marlboro - one might be a bit stronger, taste a little different, but the health concerns are identical between the two varietes.
Now, the *average* potency has probably increased in the last 50 years, due to advances in growing technique and pressure from the drug war. Higher potencies mean a lesser amount of material to smuggle for a given profit.
Yeah, when I read the title I thought this would be about a Mozilla developer. Then I read the summary and I didn't recognize a single one of the names or series mentioned. Then I was like "Wtf, there's sci-fi puppet shows?"
Since you mention iPads specifically in regards to network usage I thought that maybe this would be relevant.
I work at an established web hosting company - not the biggest but certainly not a start-up either. I've taken many support calls from Apple users regarding e-mail specifically. It seems that Apple's mail clients like to open large numbers of IMAP connections - and keep them open. One customer called whose entire account was taken down because she had spawned 50+ processes on a shared server. It was 100% Apple. Turns out she had an iPhone plus a Macbook - so I ended up having to explain to her how to change the relevant settings across all her iGarbage so that it would only check for mail periodically, not continuously. The MacBook had just been idling during the call, by the way.
I don't want to blame it all on Apple, but they are afflicted with the same "chase the shiny, fuck the technological repercussions" syndrome which many people have. There's *loads* of software that wastes bandwidth, but it's also the users. The day that MySpace users could paste HTML into their pages is when this began. True, we had GeoCities back in the day - but those were blink tags and GIFs. It's just gotten worse now with every grandmother and high school dropout trying to go "Web 2.0".
You should see some of the WordPress sites I have to deal with. Streaming 5 videos on a page that's already bogged down with 30 conflicting live-chat plugins? Why not!
The problem is that this is good for nobody except a police commissioner who gets good PR, and maybe the Maury-watching drama queens who feed on gossip and wrecked lives.
It's not consensual if it's done under threat of being shot, stabbed, blown up with C4, etc.
I could walk into a bank in my Star Wars shirt and a propeller hat, and ask them to please grace me with $900,000, no I don't have an account here, but I'd like $2 mil please, and I doubt they would comply. It also wouldn't be attempted robbery.
Oppressive regimes in the Middle East rank among the worst (but not particularly worse than) other oppressive regimes in other parts of the world? Is that a "surprising truth"?
If anything this just confirms what we already knew - those in power there are interested singularly in that power, and Islam has just been a convenient way to justify it to their population.
Not that Islam is conducive to free speech or any other advancement of the human species - but it's not the main reason these countries are censoring the internet.
While it'd be nice to have your entire collection in the highest quality on an iPod, I doubt there's much market for it.
My music collection, which is large enough that it shocks everyone I've shown it to, is currently 189 GB. Yes, I know there are people with larger collections. Yourself, obviously. But you're in "the 1%".
Now, about a quarter of my collection is FLAC (rest MP3/AAC/Vorbis) - and the average bit rate across the entire collection is 382 kbps. 17,481 tracks, seven solid weeks of playtime.
For a portable player, I've got no issue compressing down to ~130 kbps AAC... which is 34% of the size. The total size of my collection at that bit rate would be 64 GB - I wouldn't have even hit the halfway point in terms of capacity.
The market of people who even have enough data to fill one of these things up is small. The market for people who have the library, and would actually want to carry it all in their pocket, at all times - is even smaller. And those people likely have got a portable 500 GB drive already.
I wouldn't bet on seeing higher-capacity PMPs for years to come, when the price on storage has come down further.
Ir/reversibility just refers to the time frame of activity. Irreversible MAOIs deactivate the MAO enzyme permanently, so that your body won't break down monoamines until it has time to build entirely new enzymes from scratch (~2 weeks). Reversible MAOIs temporarily deactivate the enzyme, so that when the drug leaves the system (could be hours or days) the enzymes will begin functioning normally.
There are two variations of the enzyme, MAO-A and MAO-B - some MAOIs preferentially bind to one type or the other, but I think they are functionally identical, or nearly so. But the only difference between reversible and irreversible MAOIs is how long it takes your body to function normally when you stop taking it.
I'm not a doctor either, but as someone who's studied this extensively, in addition to going through treatment myself, and knowing others who have also gone to treatment, I feel qualified to say this: Modern psychiatric "best practice" is to prescribe SSRIs (or similar newish agents like SNRIs) as first-line treatment. Only if the patient fails to respond to SSRIs, are second- and third- line medications like MAOIs and tricyclics considered.
It's been this way for at least the last decade, maybe two. SSRIs first hit the scene in the late 80s/early 90s.
"Tens of thousands" sounds over-optimistic. Tens of hundreds maybe... this is a news item that most people have forgotten about by now, or never cared about at all in the first place, or they were on the government's side. It's not the Olympics, or a Coldplay concert.
Now, even a few hundred people might still be useful for obfuscating Assange's exit. However, the English police would know about the rally also, since the date would be planned in advance and the general public would know about it. So they'd just set up a "quarantine zone" of roadblocks and not let anyone into the space around the embassy (unless they could prove they had business there). If protest-dismantling works like it does in the US, they'll just say "Oh, this group didn't have a permit" and then either refuse to issue a permit, or issue it for another location entirely, on the other side of town.
Slashdot Mirror
FWIW I think ethanol along with many other alcohols can be vaporized without combusting. Personally I have done some kitchen chemistry with isopropanol. While evaporating it in a smallish room, it built up to a noticeable odor in the room and I think the buzz I got was a little more than placebo. Kinda like drinking the stuff, or huffing correction fluid or acetone. Not that I recommend doing any of this - but airborne delivery of alcohol seems plausible. probably would irritate the fuck out of your throat
The different leaders have different AI personalities - some just don't give up 'til the last man dies. Others may be willing to crack a deal. Montezuma is more likely to declare war on you than Gandhi, for example. I've played an unbelievable amount of Civ 5 over the past few years, and I'd say it's an 80/20 split in favor of the enemy surrendering if their army is wiped out and you have them surrounded.
:)
I've seen *very* few games where other civs failed to expand. By 1500 AD even the slowest civs will have at least 3 or 4 cities founded. The only exception to this is if they have had their cities captured, or their neighboring civs simply claimed all the territory in the area and had the military power to defend it.
Which difficulty are you playing at? It sounds like it might be too easy and you need to bump it up another difficulty level. I play at 1 higher than the default. I go up to 2 higher if the risk of losing horribly that day doesn't bother me
Which version of the game are you playing? Early versions did have worse AI in many respects, but that was mostly resolved even before Gods and Kings came out.
Shouldn't world wonders *inherently* give tourism? Shouldn't religious buildings have a cultural impact as well? It's weird.
Many world wonders (and most national wonders) contain a Great Work slot, or even a slot pre-filled with a Great Work. If you are trying to win a tourism victory, it's difficult if you only rely on non-Wonder buildings to provide Great Work slots. Unless you have a large empire (6+ cities) you will run out of building-provided slots sooner than you'd like - then you're left with slots from Wonders. FWIW there are also 1 or 2 wonders that directly give a tourism boost, not just great works slots.
There are also several religious buildings that provide a culture bonus. The Shrines and Temples don't, but once you or any other player found a religion, you can add religious tenets allowing you to purchase Mosques, Cathedrals, and I believe one other building. These advanced religious buildings [i]do[/i] increase culture, as well as giving +1 to faith and/or happiness depending on the building. Furthermore, they can only be purchased with faith, not gold or production. Not having to sacrifice gold or production is [i]very[/i] useful in the small empires you'd build trying for a tourism victory. True, you have to spend faith instead - but it's not a lot, and you should already have excess faith if you're taking this strategy.
How long ago did the domains expire? My experience is that on the expiration date, your domains get held in a renewal period of 30 days where you can renew it at normal price without any possibility of losing the domain. After that period is an additional 1 - 3 months where the domain is in a different status where the registrar still has control over it, but you need to pay an additional fee (often called "redemption fee") to renew it. If you don't pay this fee the registrar is free to auction the domain or otherwise sell it to someone else.
NameCheap's website contradicts your experience, stating that most domains with them have a redemption fee of $200 : https://www.namecheap.com/supp... I presume your domains had been expired for several months and had been fully released by the time you checked. $200 is actually on the high side, most registrars are closer to $80 for redemption fees.
Other sources: Personal experience registering domain names since 1998, and professional experience of several years working at a company that resells domain registrations.
Bro, you're a cust.
Or, if an Indian or Chinese programmer take over your job (much more likely than the Singularity), then you can count on work being harder to find and pay being less.
I don't know of any peanuts that will hide in your house, track you down, then feed on you as you sleep.
In that situation, the woman hadn't committed any wrong against the man. Maybe didn't even know him. On the other hand, banks rape the people on a daily basis...
Not all - in fact the sure the majority of them don't do this. Besides Network Solutions, eNom, and a few others, many domain registration sites out there aren't fully-fledged registrars. Even if the only name you see in a WHOIS lookup is the company you directly paid for the registration, there's a good good chance they use another registrar on the back end. Essentially these companies are just resellers. They pay $6 or whatever for the domain, then charge you $12 for it. This means that even if you choose not to register, the domain, if they sneak-register it from under you, that does incur a monetary cost, making it unlikely.
I work for a domain reseller. Now, GoDaddy and Network Solutions may very well not have to pay anything for registration, so this tactic might be more useable for them. But for the company I work for, this tactic would be a financial loser.
As indicated in another reply, these requirements are for the *registrars* of the domain, not the *registrants*. What it means is that GoDaddy (or whoever your registrar is) will have a bit more work to do. Will they pass on the costs to end users? Maybe, but I doubt it's much. The end user might have a bit more difficulty entering fake contact information, since the registrars will be auditing that information better. Other than that there's no difference to the end user, at least from the things you quoted. IWAACTAADR. (I Work At A Company That's Also A Domain Registrar).
These "Domain management companies" you speak of are what I call "scammers". I've gotten similar notices in the mail, after registering my first domain. "Hey, your domain is expiring next year. Give the ownership to us and renew it for only $80 a year!" Of course, this letter fails to note the other option, which is leaving my domain where it's at and continuing to renew for $12 annually.
I can't fathom why anyone would want someone to "manage" their domain registrations, unless they have no clue what a domain registration actually is. This is how you manage it: You pick name. You type in your contact info, and optionally the name servers you want to use. You renew it annually. That's it. The most complicated thing you could ever do is trying to transfer it - which just means clicking the "Unlock" button on the registrar's site, getting the transfer key, and providing that to the new registrar. Way easier than doing taxes.
The only thing hard thing about it is that people don't understand domain registration is separate from DNS management and service hosting (web sites, for example). People commonly get the idea that all of these things are the same. If you have that conception, you're already on bad footing since you're trying to be webmaster and IT with zero skills.
The right thing for those guys to do isn't to succumb to the smooth talker who promises to make all the technical problems go away. (Then steal the domain.) If they don't or can't learn webmaster skills, they need to either (a) employ someone trustworthy who does, or (b) start *from the beginning* with an integrated registration/design/hosting service that takes care of everything end to end. It might seem cheaper to do it DIY in the beginning, but to successfully DIY you have to know how to DI first.
Do you really think it's fair to call a 50 year old woman who wants a nice website for her cat-blog a moron?
Yes, if she expects to take on the role of webmaster and developer, with zero technical experience. I absolutely call that a moron. It's the equivalent of that same lady trying to build a kit car, which then loses a wheel and explodes rolling out of the driveway.
The right thing for her to do is find a qualified individual or company to create the site for her, if she wants that level of customization and control. Otherwise, she belongs on Blogger or Facebook, where she can post her cat pictures, but doesn't need technical skills beyond manipulating a GUI.
Carbon footprint is one thing, and that has global consequences. But the bigger toxicity of heavy metal mines and refining is from the *material itself*, and that contamination is more local. That is, if it's made in China, it stays (more) in China.
The stakes here are much higher. If Los Angeles and Seattle were to get nuked, it would make *all* the Middle East wars look like a pillow fight.
"The content of those directories could be downloaded, including directories containing sensitive data like password hashes"...
All the WordPress installations I've dealt with (quite a few, it's part of my job) had users' password hashes stored in a MySQL database. I wonder why the W3 plugin is writing them to the file system in the first place?
It is the same plant with the same genetics and the same active constituents (THC and friends). While there are different strains, it's like smoking a Camel vs. smoking a Marlboro - one might be a bit stronger, taste a little different, but the health concerns are identical between the two varietes.
Now, the *average* potency has probably increased in the last 50 years, due to advances in growing technique and pressure from the drug war. Higher potencies mean a lesser amount of material to smuggle for a given profit.
You'd think, but it seems like 80% of the posts on this article are talking about RAM.
Yeah, when I read the title I thought this would be about a Mozilla developer. Then I read the summary and I didn't recognize a single one of the names or series mentioned. Then I was like "Wtf, there's sci-fi puppet shows?"
Since you mention iPads specifically in regards to network usage I thought that maybe this would be relevant. I work at an established web hosting company - not the biggest but certainly not a start-up either. I've taken many support calls from Apple users regarding e-mail specifically. It seems that Apple's mail clients like to open large numbers of IMAP connections - and keep them open. One customer called whose entire account was taken down because she had spawned 50+ processes on a shared server. It was 100% Apple. Turns out she had an iPhone plus a Macbook - so I ended up having to explain to her how to change the relevant settings across all her iGarbage so that it would only check for mail periodically, not continuously. The MacBook had just been idling during the call, by the way.
I don't want to blame it all on Apple, but they are afflicted with the same "chase the shiny, fuck the technological repercussions" syndrome which many people have. There's *loads* of software that wastes bandwidth, but it's also the users. The day that MySpace users could paste HTML into their pages is when this began. True, we had GeoCities back in the day - but those were blink tags and GIFs. It's just gotten worse now with every grandmother and high school dropout trying to go "Web 2.0".
You should see some of the WordPress sites I have to deal with. Streaming 5 videos on a page that's already bogged down with 30 conflicting live-chat plugins? Why not!
The problem is that this is good for nobody except a police commissioner who gets good PR, and maybe the Maury-watching drama queens who feed on gossip and wrecked lives.
It's not consensual if it's done under threat of being shot, stabbed, blown up with C4, etc.
I could walk into a bank in my Star Wars shirt and a propeller hat, and ask them to please grace me with $900,000, no I don't have an account here, but I'd like $2 mil please, and I doubt they would comply. It also wouldn't be attempted robbery.
Oppressive regimes in the Middle East rank among the worst (but not particularly worse than) other oppressive regimes in other parts of the world? Is that a "surprising truth"? If anything this just confirms what we already knew - those in power there are interested singularly in that power, and Islam has just been a convenient way to justify it to their population. Not that Islam is conducive to free speech or any other advancement of the human species - but it's not the main reason these countries are censoring the internet.
While it'd be nice to have your entire collection in the highest quality on an iPod, I doubt there's much market for it.
My music collection, which is large enough that it shocks everyone I've shown it to, is currently 189 GB. Yes, I know there are people with larger collections. Yourself, obviously. But you're in "the 1%".
Now, about a quarter of my collection is FLAC (rest MP3/AAC/Vorbis) - and the average bit rate across the entire collection is 382 kbps. 17,481 tracks, seven solid weeks of playtime.
For a portable player, I've got no issue compressing down to ~130 kbps AAC... which is 34% of the size. The total size of my collection at that bit rate would be 64 GB - I wouldn't have even hit the halfway point in terms of capacity.
The market of people who even have enough data to fill one of these things up is small. The market for people who have the library, and would actually want to carry it all in their pocket, at all times - is even smaller. And those people likely have got a portable 500 GB drive already.
I wouldn't bet on seeing higher-capacity PMPs for years to come, when the price on storage has come down further.
Ir/reversibility just refers to the time frame of activity. Irreversible MAOIs deactivate the MAO enzyme permanently, so that your body won't break down monoamines until it has time to build entirely new enzymes from scratch (~2 weeks). Reversible MAOIs temporarily deactivate the enzyme, so that when the drug leaves the system (could be hours or days) the enzymes will begin functioning normally.
There are two variations of the enzyme, MAO-A and MAO-B - some MAOIs preferentially bind to one type or the other, but I think they are functionally identical, or nearly so. But the only difference between reversible and irreversible MAOIs is how long it takes your body to function normally when you stop taking it.
I'm not a doctor either, but as someone who's studied this extensively, in addition to going through treatment myself, and knowing others who have also gone to treatment, I feel qualified to say this: Modern psychiatric "best practice" is to prescribe SSRIs (or similar newish agents like SNRIs) as first-line treatment. Only if the patient fails to respond to SSRIs, are second- and third- line medications like MAOIs and tricyclics considered.
It's been this way for at least the last decade, maybe two. SSRIs first hit the scene in the late 80s/early 90s.
"Tens of thousands" sounds over-optimistic. Tens of hundreds maybe... this is a news item that most people have forgotten about by now, or never cared about at all in the first place, or they were on the government's side. It's not the Olympics, or a Coldplay concert.
Now, even a few hundred people might still be useful for obfuscating Assange's exit. However, the English police would know about the rally also, since the date would be planned in advance and the general public would know about it. So they'd just set up a "quarantine zone" of roadblocks and not let anyone into the space around the embassy (unless they could prove they had business there). If protest-dismantling works like it does in the US, they'll just say "Oh, this group didn't have a permit" and then either refuse to issue a permit, or issue it for another location entirely, on the other side of town.
That ammo's already been shot off. Just empty shell casings now.