For example, he says that women are on average more neurotic
Actually, he quotes well-established and absolutely solid science that says that "women score higher on neuroticism". That is a bit different from your statement. And it happens to be a verifiable fact. Your whole wording screams "lie" when seen in comparison to what he actually said.
And there you have outed yourself as an anti-reason fundamentalist. This argumentation is not valid in anything a bit more complex and the questions this is about are pretty complex.
Not by any halfway sane and rational analysis. In fact it was very far from it. Sure, he gave rational and fact-based arguments (i.e. "valid" arguments) for some things that a specific faction of the population does not want to hear, but it is you giving propaganda-lies as a non-factual response. The truth hurts and many people cannot deal with it. You are just one more example of that.
The person one before is not an atheist. He is a nihilist and that is a religious stance. (In actual reality, he is just an evil sadist troll, because he does not care about consent of his victims.)
Pretty much. But it gives the "Emotion first!" people a pseudo-justification for their completely ridiculous reaction. You know, those people that want "safe spaces" at a place of learning and growing, were anything should be happening except that you can comfortably stick to your established misconceptions. Anti-reason and anti-understanding is on the raise. And, if not stopped and firmly put in its place, it will kill society.
Definition of "microbes go rogue": The designer fucked up badly due to small skills, big ego and management pressure. I.e. the normal way things happen these days of pseudo-skills.
And they are "too expensive" and after the technology has become somewhat widespread, it will be done without the safety mechanisms. And guess what? Nothing will be happening to the guilty, just as today.
So while there does not seem to be a direct argument that there is a causal relationship where "screen time" causes depression, the lie is implicit. First, the "screen time" is called "excessive", i.e. "bad". Then the direly needed warning that correlation is not causation is noticeably absent. To make this worse, it is not called "correlation", but the far less well defined term "association" is used.
This is just another example manipulative writing. That is indeed bad, because it obscures reality and replaces it by the preconceptions of the author about what must be "bad" (and hence everything must be either proof the author is right or must be ignored).
And make it MS Git: Incompatible to itself, always changing interface, only runs well on Windows. Seriously, the comment about version compatibility in Git should be a huge red flag.
One of the best lectures I ever had was done by a French professor with really bad English (the TA was not much better). But: He had selected an excellent book, and was handing out excellent exercise sheets.
Indeed. And most are too smart to go into politics in the first place. But the best and brightest can make a lot of money nonetheless, if conditions are right.
You do not even understand how distributions work. Guess your name will not be found among the "best and brightest".
The fact of the matter is that the best and brightest of a country (which is a small number of all people) will search opportunities abroad of a) things at home are not good and b) there are attractive opportunities abroad. Traditionally, the US got most of their best scientists and engineers that way, because US education sucks and US society seems to do its very best to discourage the smartest kids from developing their skills. Guess that parasitic arrangement will stop now.
Many of these people will be on a grant. So, yes, it has nothing to do with education cost. It is not all Trump's fault though, Bush did some preparation too and Obama did not do enough to counteract.
Buying smart-home devices at this time would be really dumb. They are insecure, unreliable and overpriced. The only thing they will do for you is cause problems.
And you are clueless about databases and about data exfiltration _and_ actual IT security. But you have a big, big ego to match those small skills. (Usually, the latter causes the former....) Pathetic.
You have a point. The really bad thing is that these people make it much harder for their children to ever be self-sufficient adults. It already started with turning colleges and universities into "safe spaces" instead of places of learning where your assumption get challenged and you come into contact with new ideas. If this is were it goes, the price for society will be very high.
Slashdot Mirror
In actual reality, you have a problem with the truth and said reality. The moderators just pick up on that.
For example, he says that women are on average more neurotic
Actually, he quotes well-established and absolutely solid science that says that "women score higher on neuroticism". That is a bit different from your statement. And it happens to be a verifiable fact. Your whole wording screams "lie" when seen in comparison to what he actually said.
And there you have outed yourself as an anti-reason fundamentalist. This argumentation is not valid in anything a bit more complex and the questions this is about are pretty complex.
Damore's memo was just misogynist bullshit.
Not by any halfway sane and rational analysis. In fact it was very far from it. Sure, he gave rational and fact-based arguments (i.e. "valid" arguments) for some things that a specific faction of the population does not want to hear, but it is you giving propaganda-lies as a non-factual response. The truth hurts and many people cannot deal with it. You are just one more example of that.
The person one before is not an atheist. He is a nihilist and that is a religious stance.
(In actual reality, he is just an evil sadist troll, because he does not care about consent of his victims.)
Pretty much. But it gives the "Emotion first!" people a pseudo-justification for their completely ridiculous reaction. You know, those people that want "safe spaces" at a place of learning and growing, were anything should be happening except that you can comfortably stick to your established misconceptions. Anti-reason and anti-understanding is on the raise. And, if not stopped and firmly put in its place, it will kill society.
Definition of "microbes go rogue": The designer fucked up badly due to small skills, big ego and management pressure. I.e. the normal way things happen these days of pseudo-skills.
And they are "too expensive" and after the technology has become somewhat widespread, it will be done without the safety mechanisms. And guess what? Nothing will be happening to the guilty, just as today.
So while there does not seem to be a direct argument that there is a causal relationship where "screen time" causes depression, the lie is implicit. First, the "screen time" is called "excessive", i.e. "bad". Then the direly needed warning that correlation is not causation is noticeably absent. To make this worse, it is not called "correlation", but the far less well defined term "association" is used.
This is just another example manipulative writing. That is indeed bad, because it obscures reality and replaces it by the preconceptions of the author about what must be "bad" (and hence everything must be either proof the author is right or must be ignored).
Problem detected between keyboard and chair....
Windows sources are a huge, bloated mess. They think everybody has that or wants that.
And make it MS Git: Incompatible to itself, always changing interface, only runs well on Windows. Seriously, the comment about version compatibility in Git should be a huge red flag.
Oh these poor politicians, all so powerless...
And fail. You forgot grants not originating from the US.
Nice one!
Indeed.
One of the best lectures I ever had was done by a French professor with really bad English (the TA was not much better). But: He had selected an excellent book, and was handing out excellent exercise sheets.
If that was the problem, then the US is doomed. A "bad accent" TA cannot hold anybody competent back.
Indeed. And most are too smart to go into politics in the first place. But the best and brightest can make a lot of money nonetheless, if conditions are right.
You do not even understand how distributions work. Guess your name will not be found among the "best and brightest".
The fact of the matter is that the best and brightest of a country (which is a small number of all people) will search opportunities abroad of a) things at home are not good and b) there are attractive opportunities abroad. Traditionally, the US got most of their best scientists and engineers that way, because US education sucks and US society seems to do its very best to discourage the smartest kids from developing their skills. Guess that parasitic arrangement will stop now.
Many of these people will be on a grant. So, yes, it has nothing to do with education cost. It is not all Trump's fault though, Bush did some preparation too and Obama did not do enough to counteract.
Fortunately, in Europe this is a criminal act.
Buying smart-home devices at this time would be really dumb. They are insecure, unreliable and overpriced. The only thing they will do for you is cause problems.
And you are clueless about databases and about data exfiltration _and_ actual IT security. But you have a big, big ego to match those small skills. (Usually, the latter causes the former....) Pathetic.
You have a point. The really bad thing is that these people make it much harder for their children to ever be self-sufficient adults. It already started with turning colleges and universities into "safe spaces" instead of places of learning where your assumption get challenged and you come into contact with new ideas. If this is were it goes, the price for society will be very high.
Incidentally, the original definition of "terrorism" is a government that rules by fear.