The Obama administration (Lynch and Comey) obstructed justice.
They only slowed it down. Justice happened on election night when it became clear that she wouldn't win. In that instant, not only did she became obsolete herself, but she took down with her a whole system of corruption, greed and moral complacency. Now if the Democrats want to beat Trump they will need someone like Oprah or Beyonce.
Just by being such a terrible candidate she did a much better job of draining the swamp than Trump. All the fucks who poured millions in the Clinton foundation and who bought furniture for them are goners; all the bloodsuckers, staffers, interns, sycophants and donors that buzzed around Darth Clinton are also ancient history. This whole soap opera with the investigations about Comey and Russia are merely the fanfare saluting the disappearance of decades of DNC corruption. That is true justice.
Now bring Oprah to entertain the masses and let real Democrats lead the political agenda. Evil has been defeated.
It would be interesting to see footage of those "not my President" peaceful demonstrations by democracy lovers side by side with footage of peaceful demonstrations around American embassies in the Middle East. AK-47 asides, it would probably be difficult to tell them apart. Fanatism, intolerance and entitlement have a lot in common.
they can self-identify as prosecutors while being defendents.
Let's be clear: defendents that identify as prosecutors cannot understand the burden of prosecutors as well as prosecutor-born prosecutors. They shouldn't be allowed to invade the space created for those who have been prosecutors over the course of a lifetime; access to this space should be granted according to experience, not identity.
That's why there should be only two kinds of courtrooms; one for the prosecutor-born prosecutors, and one for everyone else. Obviously the defendents, cisdefendents and self-identifying defendents don't need dedicated courtrooms since they have experienced a life of privilege.
You should put that on t-shirts and sell it to those "Democrats" who always want to impeach presidents when the other party wins the elections and who demonstrate their love of free speech by doing their best to disrupt and silence those who disagree with them.
It's always amusing to note that none of the countries that have "democratic" in their name are even slightly democratic (e.g. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea). Well, more and more it seems to apply to political parties and their followers as well.
But basically you really REALLLY don't understand what a bloc is.
Oh I understand it clearly. The "bloc" is why you hypocrites stand behind all those agreements to fight greenhouse gas emissions; it's because you bundle your shit together, and spread the pollution numbers of your industrialized countries over all the EU weak links that barely have indoor plumbing.
I don't understand how you can be so proud to be part of such a chicken shit union, especially since your people can't even fight their own wars, but if you feel more secure in your "bloc", enjoy it; nobody will ever try to take it from you because nobody else cares about it.
There are days where browsing at -1 and reading the weird gay porn comments is the best thing to do on Slashdot. Some of those underground gay porn writers are pretty good.
Europe as a bloc is economically more powerful than your country.
That is not even close to be true. The sum of the GDP of Germany, UK, France and Italy is less than half that of the USA; California alone has a bigger GDP than the UK. As for "Europe as a bloc", I assume you're talking about the EU, and the EU has a lower GDP than the USA.
Dude, Mexico has a bigger GDP than Sweden and the Netherlands combined. Get real.
Furthermore, the UK is one of the USA's closest allies, not that Agent Orange really gives two fucks about that.
Maybe he has a point. What is the strategic value of the UK? If Europe still mattered, Germany would be the country to consider for a strategic alliance. But now the whole continent is at best a quaint and pricey tourist destination for Arizona retirees bored with Cabo and San Miguel.
Amazing that you cannot see that he is making a fool of your entire country... that's what partisanship does for you I guess.
He's not making a fool of the country. And anyways, who cares? You're gonna stop buying iPhones because of him? You're gonna stop using Google, watch Netflix or eat Corn flakes? What's the actual, measurable impact of that alleged foolishness?
And he was perfectly within his rights for getting out of the Paris agreements; he's been elected in large parts on a platform of withdrawing from useless involvement in various international programs and from a disastrous foreign policy, so the administration can focus on the actual needs of the country.
As for partisanship: maybe it's a case of kettle calling a pot black. Maybe it's the people who relentlessly say that he's making a fool of himself and/or the country that are blinded by their political views.
Well, the declaration pretty much confirmed that all the propaganda posted by bitter liberals since election night was baseless, so I'm not sure what has been accomplished today from your point of view.
Whether you're just some Putinbot or just a pathetic alt-right basement dweller, the time has come, whether or not any of this rises to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors" to label Trump what he is; corrupt and careless, and pretty fucking stupid as well.
If that's your conclusion following Comey's statements, then what you have is an extreme case of panties in a bunch. I know you were probably sitting at the edge of your seat like other sore losers, hoping for some evidence of all that bullshit people like you have been posting all over internet since you lost your elections, so I'm sorry if reality doesn't match your biased views. But dude it's time to grow up and accept that you're just wrong.
It's a key takeaway because all we hear from the mainstream media and from biased liberals is about alleged interference from Trump regarding the FBI investigations, while it's clear now that the only actual interference mentioned by Comey is the one regarding Clinton under Obama.
Airbus planes are basically flying without pilots. There's people in the cockpit but they can't override the computer in case of emergency (since French engineers know everything) and can only do minimal things within specific guidelines enforced by the computer; they're just slightly more in charge of the planes than flight attendants.
My guess is you understand the Paris accords just about as well as Trump, meaning not at all...
When someone disagrees with you, it doesn't mean they don't understand the topic, it just means they don't agree with you. Hopefully one day you will grow up and realize that.
You don't understand how business with China works. First, they never consider themselves bound by agreements or contracts; they only honor them as long as it suits them, and expect the other party to do the same. Ask anyone who has done trading with them and who got their containers turned back in Shanghai because suddenly the agreed upon price was no longer pleasing them.
They will work something out and thanks to Trump it won't be a bend-over deal.
Still he's not as "business-like" as I would have expected. The money they spend for his trips to Florida and the security of his wife is just ridiculous. I understand he's been used to a kind of lifestyle but he should have left that behind when he signed up for the job.
It would be amazing to have a cheap President that pulls out the chainsaw and cut federal expenses, starting with his own, like Sarkozy did in France (he even asked the lady in charge of cost-cutting to cut her own expenses). Someone who would truly be there for the good of the country, and who wouldn't transform Air Force One in a personal vacation travel service (like Trump or Obama) and who wouldn't transform the White House in Airbnb (like during the Clinton administration, when 800+ donors stayed overnight in the Lincoln bedroom in 3 years).
So when you make wild accusations without providing any evidence, you're interested in the truth, while when I question your baseless statements, I'm just cheerleading?
If your shallow political views can't stand the test of heated discussion, maybe you should spend more time on Pinterest and less on Slashdot.
Where were you when Clinton lied to the Congress and made the country look like it's being led by a sex crazed liar? Or when he pardoned terrorists to help his wife gain political clout in the Puertorican community? Where were you when Hillary Clinton's brothers had to pay back the money they took in exchange for getting Bill Clinton to pardon crooked businessmen?
THAT was embarrassing. Trump is merely walking on people's toes and that's what he was hired to do.
Slashdot Mirror
The Obama administration (Lynch and Comey) obstructed justice.
They only slowed it down. Justice happened on election night when it became clear that she wouldn't win. In that instant, not only did she became obsolete herself, but she took down with her a whole system of corruption, greed and moral complacency. Now if the Democrats want to beat Trump they will need someone like Oprah or Beyonce.
Just by being such a terrible candidate she did a much better job of draining the swamp than Trump. All the fucks who poured millions in the Clinton foundation and who bought furniture for them are goners; all the bloodsuckers, staffers, interns, sycophants and donors that buzzed around Darth Clinton are also ancient history. This whole soap opera with the investigations about Comey and Russia are merely the fanfare saluting the disappearance of decades of DNC corruption. That is true justice.
Now bring Oprah to entertain the masses and let real Democrats lead the political agenda. Evil has been defeated.
It would be interesting to see footage of those "not my President" peaceful demonstrations by democracy lovers side by side with footage of peaceful demonstrations around American embassies in the Middle East. AK-47 asides, it would probably be difficult to tell them apart. Fanatism, intolerance and entitlement have a lot in common.
they can self-identify as prosecutors while being defendents.
Let's be clear: defendents that identify as prosecutors cannot understand the burden of prosecutors as well as prosecutor-born prosecutors. They shouldn't be allowed to invade the space created for those who have been prosecutors over the course of a lifetime; access to this space should be granted according to experience, not identity.
That's why there should be only two kinds of courtrooms; one for the prosecutor-born prosecutors, and one for everyone else. Obviously the defendents, cisdefendents and self-identifying defendents don't need dedicated courtrooms since they have experienced a life of privilege.
Make America Fascist Again
You should put that on t-shirts and sell it to those "Democrats" who always want to impeach presidents when the other party wins the elections and who demonstrate their love of free speech by doing their best to disrupt and silence those who disagree with them.
It's always amusing to note that none of the countries that have "democratic" in their name are even slightly democratic (e.g. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea). Well, more and more it seems to apply to political parties and their followers as well.
But basically you really REALLLY don't understand what a bloc is.
Oh I understand it clearly. The "bloc" is why you hypocrites stand behind all those agreements to fight greenhouse gas emissions; it's because you bundle your shit together, and spread the pollution numbers of your industrialized countries over all the EU weak links that barely have indoor plumbing.
I don't understand how you can be so proud to be part of such a chicken shit union, especially since your people can't even fight their own wars, but if you feel more secure in your "bloc", enjoy it; nobody will ever try to take it from you because nobody else cares about it.
Remember when the Liberals cared about Liberty?
You mean when they were fighting the Republicans and trying to start a new country so they could keep their slaves?
There are days where browsing at -1 and reading the weird gay porn comments is the best thing to do on Slashdot. Some of those underground gay porn writers are pretty good.
of course Obama is relevant; it's his administration that started this trend of asking Comey to stop looking into things.
Invade the UK? For what purpose? Get cheap ugly extras to play zombies in the Walking Dead? What else could anyone possibly want to get from the UK?
Europe as a bloc is economically more powerful than your country.
That is not even close to be true. The sum of the GDP of Germany, UK, France and Italy is less than half that of the USA; California alone has a bigger GDP than the UK. As for "Europe as a bloc", I assume you're talking about the EU, and the EU has a lower GDP than the USA.
Dude, Mexico has a bigger GDP than Sweden and the Netherlands combined. Get real.
Maybe UK people just vote "against" rather than "for" like they do in many parts of the world. Case in point, the USA.
Furthermore, the UK is one of the USA's closest allies, not that Agent Orange really gives two fucks about that.
Maybe he has a point. What is the strategic value of the UK? If Europe still mattered, Germany would be the country to consider for a strategic alliance. But now the whole continent is at best a quaint and pricey tourist destination for Arizona retirees bored with Cabo and San Miguel.
Amazing that you cannot see that he is making a fool of your entire country ... that's what partisanship does for you I guess.
He's not making a fool of the country. And anyways, who cares? You're gonna stop buying iPhones because of him? You're gonna stop using Google, watch Netflix or eat Corn flakes? What's the actual, measurable impact of that alleged foolishness?
And he was perfectly within his rights for getting out of the Paris agreements; he's been elected in large parts on a platform of withdrawing from useless involvement in various international programs and from a disastrous foreign policy, so the administration can focus on the actual needs of the country.
As for partisanship: maybe it's a case of kettle calling a pot black. Maybe it's the people who relentlessly say that he's making a fool of himself and/or the country that are blinded by their political views.
Well, the declaration pretty much confirmed that all the propaganda posted by bitter liberals since election night was baseless, so I'm not sure what has been accomplished today from your point of view.
Whether you're just some Putinbot or just a pathetic alt-right basement dweller, the time has come, whether or not any of this rises to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors" to label Trump what he is; corrupt and careless, and pretty fucking stupid as well.
If that's your conclusion following Comey's statements, then what you have is an extreme case of panties in a bunch. I know you were probably sitting at the edge of your seat like other sore losers, hoping for some evidence of all that bullshit people like you have been posting all over internet since you lost your elections, so I'm sorry if reality doesn't match your biased views. But dude it's time to grow up and accept that you're just wrong.
So how is it in any way they "key takeaway"?
It's a key takeaway because all we hear from the mainstream media and from biased liberals is about alleged interference from Trump regarding the FBI investigations, while it's clear now that the only actual interference mentioned by Comey is the one regarding Clinton under Obama.
Airbus planes are basically flying without pilots. There's people in the cockpit but they can't override the computer in case of emergency (since French engineers know everything) and can only do minimal things within specific guidelines enforced by the computer; they're just slightly more in charge of the planes than flight attendants.
My guess is you understand the Paris accords just about as well as Trump, meaning not at all...
When someone disagrees with you, it doesn't mean they don't understand the topic, it just means they don't agree with you. Hopefully one day you will grow up and realize that.
You don't understand how business with China works. First, they never consider themselves bound by agreements or contracts; they only honor them as long as it suits them, and expect the other party to do the same. Ask anyone who has done trading with them and who got their containers turned back in Shanghai because suddenly the agreed upon price was no longer pleasing them.
They will work something out and thanks to Trump it won't be a bend-over deal.
Still he's not as "business-like" as I would have expected. The money they spend for his trips to Florida and the security of his wife is just ridiculous. I understand he's been used to a kind of lifestyle but he should have left that behind when he signed up for the job.
It would be amazing to have a cheap President that pulls out the chainsaw and cut federal expenses, starting with his own, like Sarkozy did in France (he even asked the lady in charge of cost-cutting to cut her own expenses). Someone who would truly be there for the good of the country, and who wouldn't transform Air Force One in a personal vacation travel service (like Trump or Obama) and who wouldn't transform the White House in Airbnb (like during the Clinton administration, when 800+ donors stayed overnight in the Lincoln bedroom in 3 years).
So when you make wild accusations without providing any evidence, you're interested in the truth, while when I question your baseless statements, I'm just cheerleading?
If your shallow political views can't stand the test of heated discussion, maybe you should spend more time on Pinterest and less on Slashdot.
Since you will refuse to acknowledge basic reality, you will not benefit from a listing of any tweet.
Okay, so as expected, you can't quote any "misinformed and dangerous" tweets. Thanks for playing.
Can't think of a worse platform of communication.
what about the Yo app?
Where were you when Clinton lied to the Congress and made the country look like it's being led by a sex crazed liar? Or when he pardoned terrorists to help his wife gain political clout in the Puertorican community? Where were you when Hillary Clinton's brothers had to pay back the money they took in exchange for getting Bill Clinton to pardon crooked businessmen?
THAT was embarrassing. Trump is merely walking on people's toes and that's what he was hired to do.
The foaming-at-the-mouth, frantic, OMG! reaction is because of how incredibly misinformed and dangerous most of his official statements are.
Why don't you post 3 of those dangerous statements, verbatim, so we can all see what truly lies behind your hysterical accusations?