Cars do not have ways to protect users from recall-worthy defects, otherwise what would the point be in a recall. Please take a moment to understand the metaphor before you use it.
This thread discusses people who do how automatically update their systems, so it does really work when the user allows it to.
Then use ps, it's a built-in alias for get-process.
MSH>help ps
NAME get-process
SYNOPSIS get-process -Id id | -ProcessName name
SHORT DESCRIPTION Lists processes currently running
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
-Id id [int[]] [pipeline input allowed] Comma separated list of process identifiers that specify the processes to ge t
-ProcessName name [string[]] [pipeline input allowed] Comma separated list of process names that specify the processes to get
-Exclude name [ArrayList] Comma separated list of process names to be excluded from the output.
--- The Command will enumerate processes from local machine and output System.Di agnostics.Process object(s). The command will write the process object to th e output pipeline one by one. The Command will take parameters like ID(Proce ss Identifier) or Process Name from command line. The Command will return th e corresponding system.diagnostics.process for the supplied ID or ProcessNam e parameter(s).
This command also supports the ubiquitous parameters: -Debug (-db), -ErrorAction (-ea), -ErrorVariable (-ev) -OutputBuffer (-ob), -OutputVariable (-ov), and -Verbose (-vb)
NOTES Exclude only works for process name.
EXAMPLES get-process Returns all running processes
get-process svc* Returns all processes with names starting with svc
Cars don't have their own mechanism to automatically check for defects from the manufacturer, and repair them while you sleep.
Your comment was completely irrelevant.
All of these exploits have been patched by Microsoft already. It is the responsibility of the end-user to keep their OS up-to-date. For those too inept, Windows XP SP2 "automatic update" feature is decent i've heard.
Slashdot Mirror
You're exactly right! We should all halt daily activity, to send the right message to the attackers..
If having 1 billion separate accounts is a nightmare, what is 1 account that has control over all of the same domains?
If anything, the exploiter will remove the blog from the face of the earth, saving us all a tiny shred of annoyance.
Would you like some SSE3 with that?
No, it'll accidentally crush the ferrari with its massive user.. i mean wheel base.
bumfights cats attacking people
Bet Dad feels a lil' sheepish now :)
So what does the slashdot effect look like IRL?
I, for one, welcome our sun sucking fan-blade overlords.
So, who hired you for this anti "M$" spam?
This reminds me of that commerical for Windex, where the term "High Definition Window" was used... How much per square foot?
Cars do not have ways to protect users from recall-worthy defects, otherwise what would the point be in a recall. Please take a moment to understand the metaphor before you use it. This thread discusses people who do how automatically update their systems, so it does really work when the user allows it to.
You, by encrypting them. But by that token, wouldn't the Botnet owner just be able to encrypt the same information?
Yeah, probably. I've been using the same build for about 4-5 months, guess it's time to update :P
By built-in I meant provided with the vanilla MSH. Sorry for any confusion.
The MSH backend is .NET and C#, so I'm really doubting that flexibility is a problem. If you don't like their grep alternative, create your own.
Cars don't have their own mechanism to automatically check for defects from the manufacturer, and repair them while you sleep. Your comment was completely irrelevant.
It is coming along nicely, 2.1 was recently released. It is not an official MS product however: http://moab.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/
All of these exploits have been patched by Microsoft already. It is the responsibility of the end-user to keep their OS up-to-date. For those too inept, Windows XP SP2 "automatic update" feature is decent i've heard.