Slashdot Mirror


OSS Web-based File Management?

breadiu asks: "I work for a department at a university, and we'd love to offer students some type of web-accessible file storage, but, like most educational institutions, money is tight. There are some great closed source solutions out there like Xythos' Digital Locker Suite, but those cost. I've had trouble finding a really well put together open source solution. I've taken a look at Slide and even Zope, but neither really match up to Xythos' offerings. What have others done to provide centralized file storage/management? Is there anything OSS that offers WebDAV, Apache support, BSD/Linux support and Active Directory-LDAP authentication with support for Windows and Mac clients?"

320 comments

  1. Not so hard by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. Never underestimate the power of a plain old FTP server. When I worked for a company with a Citrix machine, it was found that the SMB access to the mainframe would only allow for one connection per IP. (Thanks alot Unisys.) So we setup a go between machine that ran an FTP server mapped to the SMB drive. The Citrix users then used the Netscape FTP support to download and upload files.

    2. Here's precisely how to do what you're looking for on a standard *nix machine: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Apache-WebDAV-LDAP-HOWTO /

    First Google result, even. :-)

    1. Re:Not so hard by millahtime · · Score: 1

      your basic non-geek user can find ftp programs a little complicated to use (don't ask why, I don't get it). Web based does allow for a certain level of comfort and ease for non-tech users.

    2. Re:Not so hard by breadiu · · Score: 2

      1. FTP is great, but there are two problems (as far as our organization is concerned) - it requires a client and credentials are sent unencrypted (FTP over SSL is possible, although it still leaves the client problem). Everyone knows how to go to a webpage, but fewer know how to install and use an FTP client.

      2. The article doesn't look like it details how to set up anything comparable to the Xythos solution. It's pretty much shows how to enable WebDAV with Apache, which is not what I was asking. I was hoping for an OSS project that was more complete. Something that offers web management and a web interface.

    3. Re:Not so hard by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      In my experience, a simple FTP client is too confusing for many tech-novices. In Windows Explorer, they can sometimes do "CTRL+select" to select individual items, and that is about as technical as they want to get.

      I hear that Windows Explorer supposedly supports WebDAV, but I haven't seen any examples of it. A WebDAV server that would allow my clients to use Explorer would be ideal.

    4. Re:Not so hard by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the beauty of it though. Users accessed the FTP server through a bookmark in Netscape. As far as they were concerned, they were looking at an ugly web page! Uploads could be done by just dragging the file onto Netscape. :-)

      Internet Explorer is even simpler as it provides a "pretty" Explorer interface to the files.

    5. Re:Not so hard by binner1 · · Score: 1

      I've done WebDAV through explorer and it's worked ok. The backend is Linux/Apache and the clients are XP pro (sp1 here).

      The only glitches that I've encountered are at connection time. Explorer is picky about having (or not having) a trailing slash on the url.

      -Ben

    6. Re:Not so hard by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You asked (and I quote): "Is there anything OSS that offers WebDAV, Apache support, BSD/Linux support and Active Directory-LDAP authentication with support for Windows and Mac clients?"

      The solution I offered has all of those features. What other features are you looking for? (In specific! I'm unfamiliar with Xythos.)

      FTP is great, but there are two problems (as far as our organization is concerned) - it requires a client and credentials are sent unencrypted

      True enough. I never worried about it because everyone had the same access. I could see how that could be an issue in your case, though. :-)

    7. Re:Not so hard by pizen · · Score: 1

      Yes, ftp programs can be hard if you don't know how to use them. But it's for a University so teaching is what they do. They should teach them how to use ftp programs. It wouldn't be that hard.

    8. Re:Not so hard by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

      Well, they're going to either need to teach the users how to access the WebDAV system or how to use FTP. Thankfully with programs like FileZilla (google it), FTP is stupid easy! Can you drag and drop? If yes, then you can use FileZilla :)

      --
      it's a sig, wtf?
    9. Re:Not so hard by cecille · · Score: 1

      I have been TA'ing a first year intro to computers class for the past few semesters, and we teach FTP as part of the labs (because we make them do it old style - CLI interface...yeah, we're mean). The first semester was a DISASTER. Combining FTP with some standard unix commands and permissions structures was definately NOT the way to go. They had a really difficult time particularily with the idea of two seperate file systems.

      The next semester didn't go so well either, even though we added in a huge section talking about FTP as a virtual line between two computers. Still no good. The next semester: now it's a line between to LOCATIONS on a computer system. Still no good. So last semester we eliminated any discussion of relative directories (that was the major stumbling point - they had a hard time figuring out where they were in 2 different file systems at the same time, especially because we had them duplicate the file structure on the local computer to create their files). We also broke it down into a 3 step process (after startup):
      1. Tell the computer where the file is coming from
      2. Tell the computer where you want it to put the file
      3. Transfer the file

      Even after this semester, the students were SO impressed when we showed them winSCP.

      My long winded answer is this then: How about winSCP? or a slight variation? You can set up an FTP server (or SCP even if you're getting fancy) and tell people to use that client to access it. If you're ambitious, you could probably even write something to program in the server name. It already accepts saved sessions etc.

      Our school used to give res kids who wanted internet access a cd with some stuff on it. It didn't do much - reconfigured the settings to access the netowrk, nothing that couldn't be done by hand. If you bundeled it with something like that, then all the res kids would have access at least. Then just pop up some instructions on a site and you're good to go.

      winSCP can be downloaded here: http://winscp.net/eng/index.php

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    10. Re:Not so hard by highcon · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never worked at a University. Obtuse people are everywhere.

      --
      You can either complain, or do nothing. You don't get both.
    11. Re:Not so hard by hazem · · Score: 1

      One of the nice things about WinSCP is that you can either have it look like midnight commander - with two panes - local & remote, or you can have the remote side look like a normal file browser window that you can drag & drop to and from.

      I'm sure some scripting could make it automatically log in, etc and make it fairly transparent to the user.

    12. Re:Not so hard by pizen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've obviously never worked at a University.

      Quite the opposite, actually. If you provide a service and say "we provide a service that allows you to do and here's a link to a tutorial we wrote teaching you how to use it" the students who want to use the service will read the tutorial and learn. The others won't probably because they don't think it's a better solution that what they had been doing (floppies, cd, or emailing to themselves).

      Even if it's the most intuitive, user-friendly system in the world there are still people who will need instructions so there's no need to dumb things down to try to eliminate that group. (I guess this is why I never liked HCI classes)

    13. Re:Not so hard by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Why so complex? I just use a web interface. Upload a file and it gives you a unique key that is unlikely to be guessed. To access the file all you need is the key. Just pass the key to people and they have access to your file. Really simple to use and reasonable secure.

      I'm beating out the features of a new version at Open Mouth by letting random netters distribute anything they want (evidently pr0n).. will probably distribute the software as opensource when I finish adding all the features I want. Already it can serve about 30GB of files a day without locking up the system and I've yet to find anyone that couldn't figure out how to use it.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    14. Re:Not so hard by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      FTP is great, but there are two problems (as far as our organization is concerned) - it requires a client...Something that offers web management and a web interface.

      What browser can't do FTP? They create the web interface for you. What could be simpler?

    15. Re:Not so hard by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      I will echo that! If a person cannot understand how it is possible to left click while using your right hand, FTP is probably not something you want to spend time trying to teach.

    16. Re:Not so hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difficulty in learnign something as simple as ftp is not an excuse at a .edu

    17. Re:Not so hard by afidel · · Score: 1

      ANY webdav server should work fine with modern (2000+) versions of windows. For a quick example of how end user documentation should look check out this page I found from a quick google search for webdav windows explorer.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:Not so hard by jdray · · Score: 3, Informative

      We were wrestling with a similar question recently, and came up with WinSCP as a solution for Windows clients accessing "file shares" on Unix boxen. Our end users are very pleased.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    19. Re:Not so hard by masklinn · · Score: 1

      FTPing in browser didn't allow you to upload but in Netscape, last time i checked

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    20. Re:Not so hard by danheskett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For windows users, try WebDrive. They dont even have to drag and drop.

      It maps DAV or FTP sites to a standard Windows drive letter, and handles everything transparently in the background. Users can use any application to edit files, etc.

      I have some users who need to upload photos from a digital camera to a website; it's perfect for them. You can even set Windows to transfer files to that "Drive" anytime they plug in the camera via that little wizard that pop-ups.

    21. Re:Not so hard by abradsn · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how you are going to get around not using a client? There are ftp clients built into just about every web browser. So the client is already there. You can make it secure with tls.

    22. Re:Not so hard by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      Desktop shortcut - 'ftp://user:pass@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'

      Remove 'user:pass@' if you require an authentication prompt. Problem solved.

    23. Re:Not so hard by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      There's the rub. Many universities want to MANDATE the use of web based file services for document distribution. You can't take the opt-in approach for this.

      For example, a professor wants to distribute a pdf document to his 300 students. Rather than print off 300 copies, he just drops them in their file storage area.

    24. Re:Not so hard by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      I think the problem most universities have is that they can't require a solution that requires specific software on the computer. The students might be using a home computer, or a work computer, or a coffee shop computer. They need something that allows them to access files and still maintain some level of privacy and security while allowing flexibility.

    25. Re:Not so hard by grolschie · · Score: 1

      I will echo that! If a person cannot understand how it is possible to left click while using your right hand, FTP is probably not something you want to spend time trying to teach.

      Then University is not the place for these people. How will they survive writing an assignment or checking email? Perhaps they need to do a basic computing course before commencing a University education that requires computer literacy?

      I mean, with something like ws_ftp which has been around for years, ftp is a no brainer. You can even set up the .ini file for them and write-protect it. All they'd need to do is remember their username and password, and how to drag and drop.

    26. Re:Not so hard by ZBytz · · Score: 1

      Agrred. On my server I have asPhpFtp, A FTP Client written in PHP.

      Native DOZE Solutions: IIS6 has EVERYTHING required built in.

      WebDAV can be enabled, and permissions can be set on the filesystem as you would home directories.

      To make FTP work properly on non-DOZE systems IIS has to be configured to use *nix directory listings.

      Personnally, i'd go down the linux route. Apache has many many many mods. Supports many authentication methods, and again, takes not of filesystem permissions. Also, install PHP and ASPHPFTP, as I have, Works perfectly. All users on my server can access their home directories through a browser.

      IIS can also be configured to authenticate FTP access through Active Directory.

    27. Re:Not so hard by pizen · · Score: 1

      web based file services for document distribution -- That's exactly what a webserver is.

      I read the problem as the Uni wanting to give students easily accessible space so they could store presentations and the like for easy retrieval in the classroom, dorm, or cluster. If the professor wants to distribute pdf documents and other material to students the best option is a class webpage or wiki where it can be posted once, not copied 300 times into 300 separate storage directories.

    28. Re:Not so hard by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      I think most people use the pile of festering dino droppings that is Blackboard for this. I believe it works great till you point 14,000 students at it and have documents that include something other than plain text or really simply graphics.

    29. Re:Not so hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can just drag a file into IE and it will upload it for you.

    30. Re:Not so hard by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. Yes, the case of a PDF would work for that, but that's not the only kinds of documents. But what about spreadsheet files that the students need to use with their work, or Word documents. You want to give them generic storage that they can use for their class related files, and give them a "folder" metaphor so that they can work on stuff without downloading it locally first, and then have to re-upload it after you're done.

      Also, you might have to pay licensing fees on the number of copies of files you distribute and only want to give some people access, and many colleges and university webservers don't have the infrastructure to give permissions to students based on the courses they're enrolled in, etc...

    31. Re:Not so hard by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      All modern graphical web clients (except Firefox, go figure) support WebDAV.

    32. Re:Not so hard by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      FTPing in browser didn't allow you to upload but in Netscape, last time i checked

      Amazing. You could use one of the dozens of free, user-friendly FTP apps then. When I got my first ISP account it came with a floppy with Eudora, Netscape and WS-FTP. Are university students really so stupid they can't work this out? If so, let them save their files on a stone tablet.

    33. Re:Not so hard by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that windows explorer, firefox, nautilus and konqueror handle FTP. Especially when using pure file-browsers, you have the advantage of familiar icons, functions, shortcuts etc, that you would use every day when handling files.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    34. Re:Not so hard by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      I read the problem as the Uni wanting to give students easily accessible space so they could store presentations and the like for easy retrieval in the classroom, dorm, or cluster.
      If that's the case, then giving each faculty member or course directory a special folder to which Apache has read access to would do the trick. The file sharing beneath that can be Samba, AFS, or Netware. All work well in an heterogeneous environment and can be tied to OpenLDAP, Kerberos or both.

      For students, it's the same thing. Each student gets a home directory and in their, along side the standards like a drop box and a shared folder, would be a folder serving as the student's home directory on the web server. This is very easy to set up with Apache, it just needs read access to the directory.

      Now if you're trying to archive or permanently store the material, then maybe something like dspace would be more appropriate. Note that dpsace is for archiving and later retrieving finished works not a collaborative tool.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    35. Re:Not so hard by masklinn · · Score: 1
      Amazing. You could use one of the dozens of free, user-friendly FTP apps then.
      I myself actually use a user-friendly non-free FTP client (and a free non user-friendly one), but that's another matter
      Are university students really so stupid they can't work this out? If so, let them save their files on a stone tablet.
      Uni students are humans, every human has limitations, some people have severe limitations in understanding how a computer and computer softwares in general work. Uni students are no exceptions (except that the ratio of retarded/non-retarded is supposed to be under the one of the average population). You'd probably surprised if you knew what you consider easy and natural that Joe Sixpack doesn't begin to apprehend, let alone do.
      I, for one, am surprised just about every day by things users just can't manage to do even though they don't _seem_ intellectually challenged.
      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  2. Is it just me? by swimin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What about providing ftp? It really sounds to be exactly like what your looking for, but I might be missing something.

  3. FTP on a Unix Machine! by PHP+Addict · · Score: 0, Redundant

    With proper permissions and restrictions, a Unix Box with a (s)FTP server makes a great solution to what you want. Every computer has some form of an FTP client that comes on it, and you could always offer a download of one of the many free GUI FTP clients out there.

    --
    Laziness, check. Impatience, check. Hubris, double check!
  4. Umm... FTP? by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a friendly, universally available, and simple way for any user to store and retrieve files on a Intranet be the best solution?

  5. MFile by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Informative

    The University of Michigan's Web AFS system. Kerberos based authentication, although it can use LDAP as well, using widely available AFS clients as well as a web interface.

    http://mfile.umich.edu/

    1. Re:MFile by ifishfortorque · · Score: 1

      We use some sort of AFS-based system at MIT, although I haven't had occasion to use one yet. http://web.mit.edu/accounts/www/lockers.html

    2. Re:MFile by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      yea but uh . . i didnt' see a link to download said software so again . . how does this help?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:MFile by aat · · Score: 2, Informative

      But you have at least 1 gig of reliable backed up storage that's web servable. I've been near or over quota for almost 8 years now :-)

    4. Re:MFile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have on good authority that mfile source code will be available at some point in the near future. The U of M-specific code needs to be removed before that can happen though.

    5. Re:MFile by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
      I wonder why someone would like to go with plain LDAP instead of sticking with the Kerberos default?

      Kerberos is a network authentication service while LDAP is a directory service. In fact, access to LDAP should be restricted using Kerberos in that case for better security given the environment IMHO.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    6. Re:MFile by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've been near or over quota for almost 8 years now
      do you plan on graduating at some point?
    7. Re:MFile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tommy Boy: You know a lot of people go to college for seven years.

      Richard: I know, they're called doctors.

    8. Re:MFile by aat · · Score: 1

      Already did so 3 years back :-)

    9. Re:MFile by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      Kerberos is a network authentication service while LDAP is a directory service. In fact, access to LDAP should be restricted using Kerberos in that case for better security given the environment IMHO
      That's the way it's usually done from what I've seen, not counting stuff set up by MSCEs.
      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    10. Re:MFile by passion · · Score: 1

      The mfile website runs an ITCS-developed software package named "file drawers". This is a web-based file manager which talks to an AFS filesystem back-end. We have plans to extend it to handle ext2/ext3 and possibly NFS.

      We intend to make the file drawers source code available via anonymous CVS under an open source license in the near future. However, the source code is not yet ready for distribution as a generic web-based file manager. The source contains a large number of graphics, hooks, and links which are specific to the University of Michigan computing environment. Creating a non-umich version is a substantial ongoing project.

      When the software is released there will be a link to the anonymous CVS repository. Please watch the file drawers website for further updates.

      --
      - passion
  6. Knowledge Tree by pgp4privacy · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Knowledge Tree by pgp4privacy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Features
      KnowledgeTree(TM) Version 2.0.0

      General Features

      * Fully web-based.
      * Powerful document version control
      * Support for common file formats (MS Word, MS Excel, PDF, TXT, HTML)
      * Subscription agents with push technology for notification of changes to documents or document directories
      * Archiving according to expiry date, expiry time period or utilisation for enhanced speed
      * Publish documents to websites
      * Document-specific discussion forums
      * Full-text search of common file formats (MS Word, MS Excel, PDF, TXT, HTML)
      * Search in user-defined metadata fields
      * Access information according to folder structure, category or document type
      * Personalised dashboard to view subscriptions, pending documents, checked-out documents and quick links
      * Virtual binders for documents based on certain criteria
      * Configurable metadata displayed when document browsing
      * Bulk uploads allow multiple files to be uploaded to a folder.
      * Supports translation of most of the user interface.

      Workflow Features

      * Improved management control of documents with ability to create a set process for document creation and publishing
      * Flexible document approval routing at the folder level
      * Delegate the creation of new documents within a document approval cycle

      Security Features

      * Access rights for document protection on a per group, role or organisational unit basis
      * SSL for encrypted and secure connections
      * Authentication integration with common LDAP servers (OpenLDAP, Sun ONE Directory Server and Active Directory)
      * Audit trails of user interaction with system including document changes

    2. Re:Knowledge Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You forgot to add a link to the KnowledgeTree's website, but here you go. KT is FLOSS and looks quite good after a quick read.

    3. Re:Knowledge Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not a feature for geographic search. I needed that some time ago and there was none. ... had to implement myself.

      Search by proximity, w/i polygon, ...

    4. Re:Knowledge Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /var/www/knowledgeTree-2.0.0/presentation/lookAndF eel/knowledgeTree/documentmanagement/archiving/req uestDocumentRestoreBL.php on line 62

      DOH!

  7. Easy... by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

    I programmed one in PHP for my own website... How hard could it be? I mean, it's even completely opensource!

    1. Re:Easy... by chipster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I programmed one in PHP for my own website..."

      Neat.

      "How hard could it be?"

      Umm..."hard" for someone who doesn't know how to script/program perhaps?

      "I mean, it's even completely opensource!"

      I perused your website, and found no code anywhere. Maybe you are referring to the PHP engine/interpreter itself as "opensource" (sic)?

      Please help us out here and tell us what value your comment offers.
    2. Re:Easy... by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I've let my website fall into disrepair; I haven't had time to maintain it. In any case, the filemanagement system is no longer on there, but yes, it is completely PHP based (whose engine is opensource, in addition to the fact that my file management script is also GPL'ed by myself). When I have enough time, I will eventually put the file management script back, and probably offer most of the scripts for download.

    3. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, mark another win for open source! How can any of those WinDoze lusers and their closed source thinking beat that!

  8. web based by millahtime · · Score: 1

    from a web based system I have not seen anything to match the comercial offerings. The OSS all seem to be very baisc. Not having versioning or any other advanced features.

    1. Re:web based by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Subversion works over WebDAV, and it supports versioning.

      I'm curious if Subversion could be used as a regular WebDAV server for this sort of use. Not quite sure how the versioning would work, since regular folks don't want to have a check-in comment every time they add a file to the repository ...

    2. Re:web based by Dialithis · · Score: 1

      I use this all the time, and it works relatively well.

      Version 1.1 had "broken" support for some clients and the revision mecahnics left a lot to be desired: If you modified a file under Windows WebDAV support, anyhow, it would see it as a "delete file", "create new file" pair. You can still go back a version and get the previous version, but the file history is broken. If you log in to the repo with a username, it does track who you are.

      Version 1.2 supposedly fixes all this so it "just works". I have not had time to upgrade yet. Modifications are logged as modifications, etc.

  9. FTP != WebDAV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    FTP is not an acceptable alternative to WebDAV. FTP service is not file service, it is file transfer service. This is different. WebDAV aware applications can modify files directly on the WebDAV server without the need for uploading and downloading.

    We use Novell and can do this via Netstorage, but this is not Open Source. I'm also interested to see if there are some good Open Source alternatives.

    1. Re:FTP != WebDAV by zoloto · · Score: 1

      pray tell... how can you edit files on a server without uploading or downloading information without being on the server itself?

    2. Re:FTP != WebDAV by huckleup · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe 'uploading and downloading" is a bit vague, and maybe you were just trying do some semantics policing, but for those don't understand it all, WebDAV works very differently than FTP as far as opening, editing and saving files. It's like saying what is the difference between FTP and SMB/AFP/NFS.

      You can kinda edit files on an FTP server through some hackery, but it has a slew of problems. Essentially the entire file is downloaded to a temp file, then the temp file is edited, then the entire thing is uploaded on save.

      WebDAV is a networked filesystem like SMB/AFP/NFS. The editing app doesn't have to have any special support, as the file is opened/edited/saved just as if it is a local file using standard file open/read/seek/write APIs. Only the range of data that the app needs to view/edit have to be down/uploaded as the app does reads/writes (just like any networked file system.) The remote WebDAV server also supports true file locking so that someone else can't open/edit the file while it is in use (as well as other meta data like MIME type etc.) .

      With FTP someone could download a file, start editing, and meanwhile someone else could download/edit/upload, then the first user uploads changes and overwrites the first edits.

      So yeah, in both FTP and remote filesystems data is 'uploaded and downloaded'. But the difference in protocols makes a big difference in how it all works to the end user.

    3. Re:FTP != WebDAV by bigsmoke · · Score: 1

      Also, I'm not too familiar with Windows, but on all my GNOME and KDE desktops I've been able to save files to WebDAV, FTP, SFTP and what-not servers for quite some time. So it's not that clear to me what the anonymous grandparent is talking about.

      --
      Morality is usually taught by the immoral.
    4. Re:FTP != WebDAV by cornice · · Score: 1

      Look at iFolder. I think this is Netstorage repackaged and _GPLed_.

      http://www.ifolder.com/

    5. Re:FTP != WebDAV by huckleup · · Score: 1

      Nowhere in his post did he say that you couldn't save using FTP. He mentioned no need for 'uploading and downloading', which, granted, is a bit technically misleading. Of course data needs to be up/downloaded with any kind of remote server. My interpretation of what he meant by those terms was the 'full file download/full file upload' scenario as opposed to the potential for partial range loading and file locking available using WebDAV.

      Range loading could be a be huge time savings if you wanted to view a very large remote file. Most sophisticated data viewers/editors will only page in the data needed on an as needed basis. I'm pretty sure even vi does this - so it opens very quickly on the first page of even very large files.

      The file locking ability of WebDAV is especially important for any kind of collaborative development, like if a team of people are maintaining a web site with all the files on a remote server. It 'used to be' very easy for all kinds of collisions. This is exactly what WebDAV was designed to solve.

      I don't get why people just don't get the difference between a file transfer model versus a networked file system. People on this site are supposed to be somewhat technically savvy. Yet so many seem to be stuck in some world where 'I've been using FTP for years and no new fangled technology can possibly be better'. Wake up! Problems are being solved all the time - you now have a choice that can make your work easier, faster and safer.

    6. Re:FTP != WebDAV by bigsmoke · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I was dense. Indeed I seem to have replied to something that was actually never said.

      I am in no way convinced of WebDAV's inferiority. I am, in fact, anxious to see the anticipated support for more advanced WebDAV functionality in Subversion, even though many of these features wouldn't be that useful in current WebDAV clients ;-) I would really love a WebDAV server/client combination that supports versioning in a way that I can actually explain to my less technical users :-D But, the way in which SVN now solves this problem transparently (I believe it was through committing on each write) also seems very nice. It just makes me wonder how they grant users access to past revisions.

      --
      Morality is usually taught by the immoral.
    7. Re:FTP != WebDAV by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      iFolder is a folder synchronization package, not a remote file access package. In a university setting, I want to be able to access my files anywhere (coffee shop, parents computer, my laptop, lab computer) without leaving them laying around for the next person to find and dig through.

    8. Re:FTP != WebDAV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Windows: Start, Network Places, Add a network place and step through the wizard, giving it the WebDav server you want to connect to. (It says it does that with FTP too, but I haven't tried that.)

    9. Re:FTP != WebDAV by huckleup · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to dis you specifically - I just noticed that so many posts on this thread are convinced that FTP is the only way to go for accessing remote files. FTP is fine if you just want to get/put something, but it isn't the same thing at all as a networked file system.

      The OP didn't specify exactly what use cases they wanted to accomplish with their accessibility to remote files. If it is just put/get, then FTP is fine. But WebDAV can do put/get as well as secure and faster inline viewing/editing, so it seems that it is a more capable general purpose service. Unless they want to explicitly not support inline access for some reason.

      I don't understand your svn issues. What exactly are you looking for? Revision control and file serving are pretty much orthogonal tasks.

    10. Re:FTP != WebDAV by bigsmoke · · Score: 1

      I've looked it up and it seems that I was too ignorant about WebDAV concepts to say anything useful about its capabilities. Most of my vague ramblings were based on the following quote from the SVN book. I was basically just dreaming of a situation where you could mount a WebDAV URL and get to past revisions of files easily without having to explain as much to users as when using TurtoiseSVN, for example. I guess my users aren't the only people who need some explaining done to them ;-)

      From the SVN book:

      Can I view older revisions?

      With an ordinary web browser? In one word: nope. At least, not with mod_dav_svn as your only tool.

      Your web browser only speaks ordinary HTTP. That means it only knows how to GET public URLs, which represent the latest versions of files and directories. According to the WebDAV/DeltaV spec, each server defines a private URL syntax for older versions of resources, and that syntax is opaque to clients. To find an older version of a file, a client must follow a specific procedure to "discover" the proper URL; the procedure involves issuing a series of WebDAV PROPFIND requests and understanding DeltaV concepts. This is something your web browser simply can't do.

      So to answer the question, one obvious way to see older revisions of files and directories is by passing the --revision argument to the svn list and svn cat commands. To browse old revisions with your web browser, however, you can use third-party software. A good example of this is ViewCVS (http://viewcvs.sourceforge.net/). ViewCVS was originally written to display CVS repositories through the web, and the latest bleeding-edge versions (at the time of writing) are able to understand Subversion repositories as well.

      --
      Morality is usually taught by the immoral.
    11. Re:FTP != WebDAV by huckleup · · Score: 1
      Revision controlled files are kept in a database of some kind, typically on a remote server. You never want to see the database files themselves, you want to see/get some revision that has been pulled out of the database (repository) or you want to submit a previously checked out (and possibly edited) version of the file back into the database. So a raw file transfer or server protocol won't do you any good - you need the database manager to do the get/diff/merge/put for you.

      Whether those revision management tasks are done from within a standalone GUI app, the command line, or a web browser are irrelevant to the task needs. There is no reason a web browser interface couldn't be made to do the work. The SVN book is just saying that simply using mod_dav_svn isn't enough. It 's not just a raw file transfer in either direction - it would have to be some server side app or client side plugin to the browser that handled all the required database management issues. Maybe something like that will be developed at some point, but apparently it's not a priority yet.

      A well written task specific tool should always be easier to use than trying to make a browser do everything. If that weren't the case, all applications would go away and the only one you'd have is a browser (and a whole lot of plugins.) (Uh, didn't M$ try to do that and got slapped?!)

      I personally don't see the need for everything to be done through a browser interface. I guess for people that aren't very technically savvy that seems the most comfortable, until they realize that what they need to do is a bit more complicated than just clicking on links. A tool with appropriate window layouts, tables, buttons, menus and such that visually and logically model what you are trying to do seems like a better approach. Not everything fits into a viewing window with links and next/prev buttons model, which is what a web brower is mostly about.

    12. Re:FTP != WebDAV by cornice · · Score: 1

      OK. iFolder a synchronization package... which allows you to access your files from anywhere (coffee shop, parents computer, laptop, lab computer) without leaving them lying around for the next person to find and dig through.

      From Novell: Novell iFolder® lets your files follow you, everywhere. iFolder allows you to access, organize, and manage your files from anywhere, anytime. iFolder also provides worry-free security, ensuring that all your files are always safe, secure and up to date. Now your files can be as mobile as you are -- at work, home or on the go.

    13. Re:FTP != WebDAV by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      We have this at the University of Calgary:
      http://www.ucalgary.ca/it/webdisk/

      Basically, WebDAV over HTTPS with a Free OS X client but non-free Windows client on almost every public computer on campus.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    14. Re:FTP != WebDAV by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      With subversion, you can always create a tag that represents a particular repository version in /tags. or /project/tags, but you have to use the command-line client or something like TortoiseSVN to do so through the normal svn:// protocol.

      Someday it may be as simple as

      http://website.tld/project/dir/file.c?revs to show revision logs... file.c?rev=101 to get a specific revision. file.c?diff=101,1 to diff to revisions.

      Not sure how this would work at a project level, however. ...tld/project?rev=100/dir/file.c doesn't look right.

  10. Openfiler is what you want. by iago · · Score: 5, Informative

    WebDAV, smb, cifs, and all sorts of other nifty goodies (built in LVM) www.openfiler.org Its GPL'd and runs pretty well.

    --
    Worst Sig Ever
    1. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by joeybagadonuts · · Score: 1

      "Openfiler v1.1pre6 requires Fedora Linux Core 2. Other releases are incompatible." And this is good how?

    2. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by hey · · Score: 1

      According to the "about" page it seems to require "CentOS Linux". Er, maybe I don't want to run that distro.

    3. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by Precision · · Score: 1

      Why? CentOS is just RHES recompiled from SRPM. I'm sure it'll work fine on any RH/FC based distro.

      --
      - U
    4. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Sounds nice, but are there any screenshots, or some more conventional downloadable binary or source package, instead of a boot disk ISO?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    5. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it works with and Redhat-based distro why don't they say that then.

    6. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      It says it "sits atop" CentOS (a free recompile of RHEL). It also says "It is distributed as a stand-alone Linux distribution". So, they've taken CentOS, done their openfiler magic, and packaged it as a distro - it's not something you just tack onto Fedora Core. I've never used it but it does look interesting for adding cheap storage in, say, an AD environment easily.

    7. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      i'm assuming that's the server software and not the client, therefore it's not as big of a problem as it sounds?

    8. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by Precision · · Score: 1

      There is a pretty large difference between "works with" and "supported on". If you look through the forums and such you'll see that it works on FC2 too.

      --
      - U
    9. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      WTH. The ISO is just an (non-bootable!) Centos install CD (probably modified). It would help if there was a standalone package or something. Is there some way I can extract the freaking disk image layout from the install CD?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    10. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by flithm · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with the original question. This is a software distribution system, not a file manager. What the hell is the matter with you, and more importantly, those with mod points!?

    11. Re:Openfiler is what you want. by iago · · Score: 1

      Ah, nothing like a good ole slashdot flame. I miss this place *sniffle*

      --
      Worst Sig Ever
  11. Dead Horse by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    FTP looks like the popular answer.
    I suggest sftp or other slightly more secure options.

  12. WebRFM or the HORDE by Chalex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our school uses WebRFM as basically a web-based file management client. It's ugly, but it works. http://mail.rochester.edu/

    The HORDE Gollem is a promising project also. http://www.horde.org/gollem/

    1. Re:WebRFM or the HORDE by neosake · · Score: 1

      I know it may be a bit off toppic, but has anyone actually had success in installing horde on debian? I've had much MUCH trouble trying to install it (esp with the php imap extentions) for IMP.
      anywayz...

      --
      "When a ball dreams, it dreams it's a frisbee"
    2. Re:WebRFM or the HORDE by KmArT · · Score: 1

      Horde, with Gollem, could do the trick for you. Gollem will tie to a number of different file server backends. Horde can use Active Directory/LDAP for authentication (and you can get a whole bunch of other useful Horde modules to boot).

  13. Keep it simple and inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up machines using Linux/FreeBSD/OpenBSD or whatever. Set up user accounts, jail them, give them whatever disk quota you feel works, mandate only SSH/SCP for file transfers. Windows people can use WinSCP to move stuff, Mac people can use whatever, and Linux/*BSD people can use whatever.

    Keep it simple. Why needlessly create extra work and complications? Warn students that onus for backing up data is on them, not on the school. Divest yourselves of any data protection gurantees. Forbid porn/music/warez storage and make all students sign stating they understand.

  14. You know - there's that KISS principle by Szaman2 · · Score: 1

    Why not FTP? This is probably the simplest solution, and one that is most flexible. Unless of course you are concerned about privacy and stuff.

    I think for clueless windows users FTP might be the most intuitive thing there is. They simply type a ftp address in explorer and have access to their FTP folders in the same way as they would be accessing the local files.

    Furthermore, you can create a shortcut on their desktop, and set Explorer to remember the login - making it a completely transparent interface to the users (as long as they are connected to the internet that is). I was amazed how my dumbest users picked up the notion of storing stuff "on the company server" when I did that for them...

    1. Re:You know - there's that KISS principle by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      For the `clueless Windows users' WebDAV is a far better solution. A WebDAV folder can be mounted in Windows as if it were a local drive, non of the copy-modify-copy that's required for FTP mounts. Also, WebDAV is supported over SSL. Oh, and it integrates equally well with the OS X finder. Maybe that's why it was stipulated in the question?

      Projects like webrfm provide a pure web interface, for those unable to use WebDAV. If you want, you could use Apache's Subversion module, and then you get versioning for free.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  15. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FP

    I think you meant FTP...

  16. Great minds think alike by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    Seems like FTP is going to be the #1 recomendation for this. It's actually what some other universities are using as well.

    When I was still in school (1 year ago), we had 50MB of web space provided by the university with access via FTP. We used it for transfering files around that we needed. (Thank you FTP integration in IE) This was especially usefull as the computers we needed access to were generally locked down so we couldn't transfer off files that were larger than floppies. As for the USB memmory sticks? At times they were unavailable (no drivers or hadn't come to market yet/been invented yet), were too small or the machines were locked down to keep anything USB from working.

    Another reason, works with any OS, browser and client. How much can be said for other products including open source ones?

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  17. Zope/Plone by t482 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Zope/Plone offers "WebDAV, Apache support, BSD/Linux support and Active Directory-LDAP authentication with support for Windows and Mac clients"

    1. Re:Zope/Plone by dragongrrl · · Score: 1

      Objectis offers free Zope and Plone hosting. It's not a final solution by any means, but it will give you an opportunity to play with them. I've had some documents on a free site there for well over a year.

      http://www.objectis.org/community-en

    2. Re:Zope/Plone by cornice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget:

      ATManaged File - http://www.enfoldsystems.com/Products/Open/ATManag edFile
      ATManagedFile allows you to store metadata in the database while keeping File assets on the servers file system. Content is treated like a first-class citizen in Plone, it can be transitioned (workflow), edited, copy/pasted. Metadata for content can be described through Archetype schema's. A managed_files tool enables administrators to specify where content is stored, the deletion policy, as well as the stored filesystem naming convention.

      PloneLocalFolderNG - http://zopyx.com/OpenSource/PloneLocalFolderNG/
      PloneLocalFolderNG allows you to mount a part of the filesystem as folder into your Plone site.

    3. Re:Zope/Plone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Plone add-on isn't even necessary. In fact, Silva may make more sense for the problem domain.

  18. Good post! by paulzoop · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for one of these for ages too. Especially one that handles quicktime movies - with thumbnail support. I often what to deliver test shots to clients (I'm an animator) via the web on a easy to use system. Is there really nothing open source that does this?...

    1. Re:Good post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you find something that's written in PHP perhaps you could intergrate something with http://ffmpeg-php.sourceforge.net/index.php

      ffmpeg-php is an extension for PHP that adds an easy to use, object-oriented API for accessing and retrieving information from video and audio files. It has methods for returning frames from movie files as images that can be manipulated using PHP's image functions. This works well for automatically creating thumbnail images from movies. ffmpeg-php is also useful for reporting the duration and bitrate of audio files (mp3, wma...). ffmpeg-php can access many of the video formats supported by ffmpeg (mov, avi, mpg, wmv...)
  19. Web based file management by herberts · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    I've written a Web based file management solution. It is based on Apache 2 with mod_dav and a bunch of Perl modules to do the auth/authz.

    It uses our Active Directory to authenticate users and manages a set of groups and shares (it is called WebShare).

    Anybody can create a group, add users to it, create a share and assign R or W or R/W permissions to an existing group.

    This is some sort of self-service WebDav repository.

    I'd be glad to share it with anybody wanting it.

    1. Re:Web based file management by youngerpants · · Score: 1
      sounds like exactly what the submitter is asking for (and I'd love a copy too).


      Care to post a link?

    2. Re:Web based file management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Do please share.

      (posting anon because I left My passwordSafe Dongle at home.)

    3. Re:Web based file management by herberts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here it is. http://www.iroise.net/WebShare.tar.gz

      I just translated it from French to English.

      This is provided as is with no support, source should be enough.

      It is based on Apache 2 (2.0.53), mod_perl. It uses several perl modules (check source) and memcached.

  20. OWL Intranet by CHR1S · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use OWL intranet for our repository. I don't believe it supports LDAP yet though. Still, worth a look. http://owl.sourceforge.net

  21. Web document systems suck by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Compared to network file systems. Slow, clunky, inconvenient. In a university, any reason AFS won't do the trick? It can even run encrypted if you don't trust the network you're running over.

    --
    Deleted
  22. FTP all the way by infernalC · · Score: 1

    FTP *is* what you are looking for. You can make an FTP server authenticate against almost anything, and FTP clients are there for every platform - including the web. Set up an FTP server and then set up a Java-based FTP client on a website for your IE users. Your Mozilla users already have one.

    Here's one free for non-commercial use:
    http://www.jscape.com/ftpapplet/

    Here's an OSS one:
    http://j-ftp.sourceforge.net/

  23. Great by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    So OSS == FREE now? And free service, no less?

    Unless I missed something and the submitter made a phylosophical argument about using "closed source" because of soemthing other than "it costs"?

    Translation:

    Hi, I'm looking for a free (as in money) online file storage solution for a bunch of people. That is, I want a free ride. I used the terms "closed source" and "OSS" to get my foot in the door, now all I need is some of you to Google for me. Thanks!

    Fantastic.

    1. Re:Great by paulzoop · · Score: 1

      What an idiotic cynical thing to write. Please, if your cant say anything positive that please keep it to yourself. You may (think) know it all - but dont tell me you never learnt anything from asking anyone.... Jeez!

    2. Re:Great by breadiu · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not looking for people to Google for me, I'm looking for witty replys, such as yours, containing words like "phylosophical."

    3. Re:Great by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Ah, you're absolutely right. If I had read your submission I would have noticed you were implementing the solution, and were looking for software, not a service.

      My apologies.

      Can I still flame you for misspelling "replies"? =)

      Gawd I need some sleep.

    4. Re:Great by huckda · · Score: 2, Funny

      "phylosophical."

      Is this anything like that pastry dough that puffs up and is kind of crunchy when baked?

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    5. Re:Great by breadiu · · Score: 1

      Can I still flame you for misspelling "replies"? =) Yes.. I deserve it! :)

    6. Re:Great by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 1

      So OSS == FREE now?

      Yes, OSS == FREE, and always has. If you don't believe me, look up the word "free" in the dictionary. "Not costing or charging anything" is only one of over a dozen definitions listed on Miriam-Webster Online.

      And free service, no less?

      No, not "service" as in "customer support", but "service" in the sense of software that runs on a computer. In that sense, Apache could be considered "free service". :-)
      --
      "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
  24. Zope by FrontalLobe · · Score: 0

    Zope may not have the offerings of commercial products, but it does have FTP and WEBDAV support (I can't recall from the system I've had to work with if zope has it built-in, but it would at least be available through add-on products).

    --
    -FL
    1. Re:Zope by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      It's builtin, but the article author says he doesn't want zope. May have his own reasons, who knows :)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
  25. Zope/Plone offer all the requested features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plone can be run with an apache or squid server in front, supports WebDAV nicely, has an LDAP based user folder which with some fiddling can be made to work with Active Directory. It works with WebDAV and FTP clients on all major platforms. Plus it has a nice web front end. And if you want it, there's Plone Desktop from Enfold Systems which is a commercial windows based specialized Plone WebDAV client. There are numerous companies and contractors who provide commercial support for Plone, and good free support is available on IRC and mailing lists. Of course a non-Plone solution could also be built on Zope that offers all of these features without too much effort.

  26. Have you considered Gollem (Horde framework) ? by haute_sauce · · Score: 1

    It is a LAMP app, and I have been relatively happy with it. http://www.horde.org/gollem/

  27. version control by blzb · · Score: 1

    you should check out subversion.

    the problem with just uploading to a web folder is you end up with many versions of the same files and lose track of which is which. also, there are problems with clobbering newer versions of files with older ones.

    with version control you always know which is the latest version of your file and can roll back to previous versions if you make a mistake (like super-undo). the windows client tortoisesvn integrates right into te windows explorer and is very simple to use once you have your repository set up. there is also a nice os x client svnx. on linux, of course, you can just use the 'svn' cli.

  28. Gmail. by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    Get an account for everyone. I have 50 invites for you if you're interested;-)

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Gmail. by kebes · · Score: 1

      This is actually a pretty good idea. The storage is large enough for most uses, it's obviously portable, and it's a solution that they can carry with them after they leave a given institution. There's also a hack that lets GMail act like an extra drive on windows machines, which makes it easy for the user: Gmail virtual drive.

  29. BT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, the best option here would be a combo/hybrid of IRC and Bittorrent. Users can distribute files amongst each other without a centralized server thus usurping your sysadmin nonsense

  30. Re:priorities by PHP+Addict · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My priorities are just fine. I care just as much as the next guy, but if we let attacks like this disrupt our daily lives, then THE TERRORISTS WIN!

    In all sincerity, aside from offering up a prayer, there isn't much most of us can do.

    --
    Laziness, check. Impatience, check. Hubris, double check!
  31. SharePoint by wasabii · · Score: 1

    Microsoft SharePoint.

    It will give you a web site where you can create document libraries. You can put documents in these libraries and open them directly in Office. The documents are locked per user. All communication is done with WebDAV.

    Best of all it's free with Windows Server 2003!

    1. Re:SharePoint by mehtajr · · Score: 1

      Of course, it doesn't work worth a damn with Mac (or I assume Linux browsers). Or at least it didn't last time I was forced to use it (early 2004).

    2. Re:SharePoint by wasabii · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks a bit weird, but the core funcationlity remains. It is a plain webDAV server at it's heart, and you can access it with open source tools. Some of the special integration that Office offeres doesn't work though.

    3. Re:SharePoint by mehtajr · · Score: 1

      In my experience, operations like file uploads and filling out forms failed routinely. Maybe that's improved (both on Sharepoint and Safari et al.'s ends)-- I haven't bothered installing and configuring our copy at the office. Maybe I'll give it a second look.

    4. Re:SharePoint by joschm0 · · Score: 1

      You dare to suggest using a Microsoft product? Even if it's free, I shudder at the thought.

      --
      01/20/09
    5. Re:SharePoint by rtshrubber · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the core functionality still is too flaky to roll out for our MAC users. Even on the windows side, the special integration features only work well with Office 2003 and that is an expensive upgrade in itself.

    6. Re:SharePoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent.Rate(Funny);
      Parent.applyNote(If you ever do that again, i'll kill you. Signed : The Anonymous Coward Congregate)

    7. Re:SharePoint by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      sharepoint runs on msde if I am not mistaken. 2 gig max db limit. all files stored in the db. large uploads flaky. customization a nightmare.

    8. Re:SharePoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mistaken.
      You can use MSDE or Sql Server - but that will cost you.

  32. Apache2 + mod_dav + mod_auth_ldap? by mdlbear · · Score: 1

    ... or is there something I'm not getting?

  33. Answered own question by DrZaius · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Maybe I don't understand the problem:

    Is there anything OSS that offers WebDAV, Apache support, BSD/Linux support and Active Directory-LDAP authentication with support for Windows and Mac clients?

    Doesn't Apache + mod_webdav + auth_ldap support all of this? Can't you just point any webdav client at apache and have web based file storage?

    If you want normal people to access it, put up a web page with instructions on how to access it.

    --
    -- DrZaius - Minister of Sciences and Protector of the Faith
    1. Re:Answered own question by rhizome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't Apache + mod_webdav + auth_ldap support all of this?

      Yes it does. This is a stupid article.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    2. Re:Answered own question by masukomi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have to install and configure an ldap server (know how to administer it), recompile apache, and know what the hell mod_webdav (or even webdav) is in the first place.

      How many non programmer people do YOU know who can do that?

      So NO, it isn't a stupid article. But your response is a great example of one of the underlying problems in the OSS community: developers tend to forget that the rest of the world isn't made up of developers.

    3. Re:Answered own question by mborland · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I would like to complain about the previous complaint.

      I agree that the guy that said 'stupid article' was a little blunt, but I think it's fair for readers of Ask Slashdot to complain when topics are at the level of 'how do I tie my own shoe?' I have no problem with someone asking for help--there are no stupid questions--but this doesn't seem like the forum for this kind of question (front page, etc.).

      I didn't get your point about technical complexity. The sysadmin/programmer's job is to understand these technologies (they listed WebDAV, & Apache in the posting after all), and the end users in this case hardly need to know anything (they just map drives or whatever, same as any other solution).

    4. Re:Answered own question by soward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      not really. Apache+mod_webdav does generally provide that functionality, but not on a per-user basis. Say you've got a school with 20,000 students. To make Apache+mod_dav work you'd need 20,000 entries in the httpd.conf. Plus it all will still run as your www user, so folx couldn't access these files through any method other than WebDAV and keep things like permissions intact.

      WebDAV is nifty in that there are client implementations built-in to most common OSes. It's also nice because it runs through most firewalls since it's built on top of HTTP. It's not so great at some things, though...speed can be an issue, resource usage on the server another, metadata concerns come up occasionally.

      Hence a nice solution would allow WebDAV access when appropriate, and other types (e.g. SMB, AFP, NFS, local, etc) when needed.

      So I don't think it's a stupid question at all -- just not asked very clearly.

      We are working on a custom DAV service to accomodate this sort of usage currently, so if there is a way to use mod_dav, have it query an ldap server to log a user in, and have it read and write files to the local filesystem as that particular uid (under unix), and do so with a single config file entry for all users, please post a link to it!

      --
      John Soward...University of Kentucky
    5. Re:Answered own question by rhizome · · Score: 1

      You have to install and configure an ldap server (know how to administer it), recompile apache, and know what the hell mod_webdav (or even webdav) is in the first place.

      Well, the submitter *did* mention all of those in the question. There are several howto's out there for creating a WebDAV server.

      So NO, it isn't a stupid article. But your response is a great example of one of the underlying problems in the OSS community: developers tend to forget that the rest of the world isn't made up of developers.

      LOL, bitter much?

      I'm not a developer.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    6. Re:Answered own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you just point any webdav client at apache and have web based file storage?

      Not when the installation of additional MS software breaks the WebDAV compatibility of a bare install of Windows.

    7. Re:Answered own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Normal people" are the only relevant people to access any application web or not.

      This kind of response and other typical of slashdot is charactistic of what has and what will marginalize the relevance of any information discussed here.

      To serve "normal people" is the only reason that Information Technology exists.

    8. Re:Answered own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      ...there are no stupid questions...

      I would like to complain about the complaint about the next previous complaint.

      There are in fact many stupid questions. Many, many, many, many, stupid questions.

      mborland, it is much simpler to say "I have never worked in Technical Support" or less charitably, "An absolute beats the truth 100% of the time."

    9. Re:Answered own question by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Apache and mod_dav will solve most of the problem but there are several real-world concerns I realize are probably not interesting to people who just want to quip about how easy a throw-junk-together solution is.

      * if you have thousands and thousands of potential users system accounts and groups are a no-go, there needs to be an automated solution.
      * if you want to allow users to share content with OTHER users, again, you have to think of groups and permissions and provide some interface for users to manage their own content and permissions
      * you need to potentially tie quota and billing into this (and again, if you don't use system accounts you need a seperate way to manage quotas)

      Even if the answer is use OSS X Y Z to do this, you still have to glue it all together with custom scripts and whatnot, so the question of whether there is an existing project that provides this out of the box is still relevant.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    10. Re:Answered own question by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      You can investigate the per-child MPM to fork as different user ids but I don't think this alone is a complete solution. You probably don't want 20,000 system accounts ANYWAY.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  34. Gmail and GmailFS by dangerousvegetable · · Score: 1

    Gmail http://gmail.google.com/ are currently offering 2Gb of free searchable storage space, which combined with GmailFS, http://www.viksoe.dk/code/gmail.htm provides a useful solution for small groups of students, thoughdue to the problem of aquiring a gmail account, maybe not widespread file storage.

    1. Re:Gmail and GmailFS by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

      Not even remotely close to being professional enough for an educational institution. next idea please.

  35. Re:priorities by timster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Alas, I told my boss "I have my priorities straight, so I need to stay home and feel sorry for the dead people in London" but he said something about how vacation time has to be approved a week in advance.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  36. use open afs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You can try openafs its mounts a filesystem for you as a network drive and its open source. Its a distributed filesystem product, pioneered at Carnegie Mellon University, this is what we use at the University of Alberta for students, well this and ssh. http://www.openafs.org/

  37. OSS Web-based File Management by raydias · · Score: 1

    You may be interested in OpenFiler http://www.openfiler.org/about/

    1. Re:OSS Web-based File Management by sphealey · · Score: 1

      Great reference - thanks. Have you heard of many sites using it in production?

      sPh

  38. phpApacheBrowser.v5.0 by v3xt0r · · Score: 0
    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  39. checkout mojoPortal by JoeAudette · · Score: 1

    http://www.mojoportal.com/ is an open source CMS that runs on mono and has a Shared Files module that stores file securly so they can't be retrieved with simple http request but can easily be downloaded/uploaded by users with permission. It doesn't currently suport ldap authentication but that is a planned feature. It also supports file version history. Lots of other godd feature like blogs, forums etc.

  40. squirelmail has a plugin by Stone316 · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly squiremail has a plugin for allocating some space to users. Check it out. Link to squirrelmail plugin

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:squirelmail has a plugin by gadago · · Score: 1

      Thank you, was looking for something like that for my squirrelmail!

  41. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't taint the issue, you don't care that it was a barbaric attack; barbaric attacks have killed tens of thousands of people in Sudan. The only reason people are shocked is because nobody thinks we can be hurt in our protective first world bubble.

    It's like calling the fire department when you burn your finger while ignoring the neighbor's house which is burning down.

  42. Try SSL-Explorer by wr3k · · Score: 1

    Go here: http://3sp.com/showSslExplorer.do

    Open Source
    AD Integration
    runs over SSL

  43. How long can you wait? by soren42 · · Score: 1


    If you can wait and/or contribute, the IdeaForge module from the akoria project will do what you're looking for. Although it is more designed for group-developed content management, it will feature version control and WebDAV access to each user's work area.

    Take a look at the meager homepage and see if you want to submit some feature requests.

    This was me thinking the same as you - where's the open source project for group content management? But, after asking and getting few satisfactory answers, I just decided to go write it.

    Any help will be much appreciated! And best of luck in your hunt...

    --

    "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
  44. Openwebmail has a useful webdisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Openwebmail http://www.openwebmail.org/

    Offer your users webmail and a webdisk with one application. The webdisk is pretty full featured (although it doesn't do versioning).

    With one app there will be less to maintain.

  45. Not FTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People that keep suggesting FTP as an answer
    didn't understand the question. You can't do
    serious file management with FTP.

  46. Write Your Own by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't want to sound like one of those guys who always go, "If you don't like it, change it." but you're in a good position to do that because of the academic setting. Make it a project for Comp Sci students or grad. students. It'll be good practice for them in managing real world projects and an good intro to open source development/philosophy. OSS seems in line with the open philosophy of academia. Find a project that does almost what you want and extend it.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  47. Windows Sharepoint Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're using Windows2003 Server, then I suggest using the Windows Sharepoint Services add on; (IT'S FREE). It will give you a webbased solution that is integrated with Active Directory and is very easy to use.... unless of course you're looking to use OSS just for the sake of using OSS.

    1. Re:Windows Sharepoint Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windows Sharepoint Services add on; (IT'S FREE). "

      Are you sure it's free? I mean, you had to purchase a Win 03 server license and did the cost of that license include the "free" products? I dunno, just asking.

    2. Re:Windows Sharepoint Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still had to purchase a restrictive, lock-in, lock-out license from MS. And like any good car salesman, MS will roll all the "free" goodies into the monthly payment, inital cost or spread it out among all its customesrs. Don't forget, MS's favorate color is Green.

  48. Multiple protocols by dafz1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If this is going to run on a Linux box:

    1. Install samba(for Windows), netatalk(for Mac), and ssh servers.

    2. On Windows machines, have them use standard Windows file sharing(\\server.schoolname.edu\shareddir). If your institution has locked down the smb port(445), have them download and run OpenSSH, which includes a graphical directory browsing window.

    3. On Macs, use the standard AFP protocol.

    4. On Linux, using scp would probably be best. You could set up an nfs server, and allow access to the world. I don't recommend this, and you should use some type of authentication.

    Otherwise, and I recommend, get a Mac running OS X. It has easy to configure, and use, smb, ssh, and AFP servers. It's a lot more stable than running the servers on a Linux box. If you have the money, I would recommend springing for an Unlimited Client copy of OS X Server. But a standard OS X box would be fine.

  49. How about Subversion? by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    I'm doing all of what you referred to using Subversion with the mod_dav_svn frontend on Apache for a content management system.

    It works *beautifully*

    1. Re:How about Subversion? by jungd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here Here. While older versions of subversion didn't support full WebDAV (just a subset needed by the svn client), the lastest versions do.
      Subversion will also give you the option of using regular files or a SQL DB for storage and you'll have versioning for 'free'.

      --
      /..sig file not found - permission denied.
    2. Re:How about Subversion? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      I was looking at this a few weeks ago (Using Subversion 1.2).

      This official document says that SVN only supports a subset of WebDAV & DeltaV. Has that hindered your usage at all? I'm not sure if the document is up-to-date

      I know that WebDAV support was greatly enhanced with the 1.2 version, but I haven't had a chance to do much research yet.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:How about Subversion? by jungd · · Score: 1

      I can't remember where I read it off-hand (release notes?). I imagine the doc is out-of-date as it was a recent development.
      I haven't used it as a remote-filesystem with non-svn-client on a day-to-day basis as the poster needs, I just tried it out was all. One of my friends also tried it using some Windows WebDAV client and informed me it seems to work OK.

      --
      /..sig file not found - permission denied.
  50. Easier way by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

    An easier way would be to avoid the Web entirely. There's a large number of FTP servers out there, many of which support FTP-over-SSL. Both Windows and Mac support accessing folders via FTP just as if they were local or network-shared folders. Configure the FTP server to authenticate against an LDAP directory (this should be trivial if the server OS is set up to authenticate using PAM) and you're ready to go.

    1. Re:Easier way by sti · · Score: 1

      Mac OS X does not allow uploads with the mounted ftp server. I.e. you can copy files from the window containing the files of the ftp server but you cannot copy files to that window. It continues to amaze me (and others) how such a detail was left unimplemented.

  51. Re:priorities by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Don't forget the middle-class families in downtown Baghdad, who used to have running water, electricity and police protection, but now exchanged these for "freedom", along with the lives of their aunties and and baby sisters.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  52. Aukyla Document Management System by arendjr · · Score: 1

    You might want to take a look at ADMS

    It's mainly targetted towards document management, especially using the new OpenDocument standard, but it can store all kinds of files. It's highly plugin-based, has some nice search features and allows for flexible permission settings. You can easily write plugins which provide extra support for special file types, like adding webbased viewers and editors and indexing functions.

    The only thing it doesn't offer on your list is LDAP authentication, but a plugin could be created for this as well.

  53. SSH and SFTP by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    Does it really have to be web-based? If you set up an SSH server your users could access it via SFTP. There are plenty of SFTP clients out there, including WinSCP for Windows, CyberDuck for OS X and Konqueror or Nautilus on GNU/Linux. WinSCP can be made to look like Windows Explorer, simplifying the experience for your Windows users.

    A few other posts above have mentioned FTP, but this would be a step backward in time. FTP should die, and now. In fact it should have died years ago, aside from its use in its anonymous form, like on download sites. SSH is free and more secure than FTP, and works better through firewalls because you don't have to worry about passive mode as you do with FTP. And you'll have the option of securely offering it outside your firewall (if you have one), since the protocol is entirely encrypted.

    1. Re:SSH and SFTP by talmage · · Score: 1

      If it has to be web based, you can use KDE's fish kioslave and konqueror for remote file access. It's built on top of ssh.

    2. Re:SSH and SFTP by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      This is interesting. I just used fish:// in Konqueror and it works great. I see that it uses SSH, but in practical terms how does this differ from using sftp:// in Konqueror?

    3. Re:SSH and SFTP by ewilts · · Score: 1

      And you can't chroot in ssh (at least in openssh) like you can with just about every FTP server popular today. Let a person at your ssh server and they'll grab your password file (no passwords but they have a list of all valid users on the system), fill /var and/or /tmp, and you're in for a major world of hurt.

      Just say no to sftp and ssh servers for untrusted users.

      --
      .../Ed
  54. RoamDrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about www.roamdrive.com? It's a free, web based file storage system that uses e-mail accounts as its medium. Probably not exactly what you want, but it's an option.

  55. Open Exchange has such features by Phelan · · Score: 1

    While Open Exchange is more of a groupware type client, it has document sharing and knowledge sharing with access control. All in a very very tidy web interface. Just the server install can cause a couple of asprin worth of a headache.

    --
    "Nimis exaltatus rex sedet in vertice - caveat ruinam!"
  56. Novell iFolder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    iFolder is a file sharing solution for workgroup and enterprise environments. Users can share mutiple directories of files across a local area network with other users - all without the need for a server using only the open source iFolder Client.

    Look for it on the Novell Forge

    1. Re:Novell iFolder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunatly it uses that .net/mono crap.

  57. SCP by Richard_J_N · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most cases, you just want something really simple, easy to implement, and understand. So, why not use SCP. It's secure, easy to set up (all you need on the server is Linux + SSH), and easy to access.

    In konqueror, type scp:// or fish://.
    In Windows, use the free WinSCP program
    In MacOsX - you have ssh/scp.

    Other advantage: if you give them a linux box to access, then it's easy to control private vs group vs public.

    1. Re:SCP by rikkus-x · · Score: 1

      I use SFTP.

      The nicest Windows client I've found is FileZilla. It supports FTP, FTP over SSL and SFTP.

      Rik

  58. Blue Shoes? by Szaman2 · · Score: 1

    BlueShoes has this interesting app called web file manager. Essentially it creates an explorer like session within your browser. It relies heavily on javascript and stuff...

  59. DSpace by angry+jimmy · · Score: 1

    How about DSpace? From their website: "A groundbreaking digital repository system, DSpace captures, stores, indexes, preserves and redistributes an organization's research material in digital formats."

    1. Re:DSpace by howlatthemoon · · Score: 1

      As it stands, DSpace is not meant for this kind of use. There is no versioning, there is not webdav access, only admins can replace files, only admins can delete files. It is meant to be a roach motel (in a good way) for data. Data goes in and is always there. It's great for many things, but not remote file storage.

  60. Advertisement, Advertisement, Advertisement by provoix · · Score: 1

    Give me a break! Exactly who let this person post an advertisement on Slashdot. We do have editors on here right?

    And please...There are a thousand ways to store documents. SSH/FTP/WEBDAV/SVN (as just a few protocols) and a meriad of apps to support them in either platform.

  61. ipdrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to look into ipdrum. you use the free mobile-to-mobile feature of any major carrier to call a dedicated cell phone attached to your computer. That call is then connected to Skype, allowing you to make free cell calls just about anywhere. once you have established this connection you can tap out morse code and form a "data network" over the line allowing your users to transmit to each other their files. problem solved.

  62. try Apache + Subversion by borzwazie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Using Subversion (subversion.tigris.org) and Apache as a front-end (WebDAV link to Subversion, connection to LDAP) you get versioned documentation, file storage, hook-ins to Active Directory or any other LDAP product, and Windows Web Folders for easy access.

    Works very well here for documentation storage. 300+ users.

    --

    "We apologize for the inconvenience."

  63. don't use a proprietary solution by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    use ftp, scp, etc. They should be learning how to use tools they'll use when they get a job.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  64. OpenDocMan by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Opendocman.sourceforge.net is a good one if you want tight, fine fine grained control, with revision mangement. Good for a research situation.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  65. Same problems here by kanotspell · · Score: 1

    We've been diligently searching for something similar with very little success. "All" that we want to achieve is a secure file transfer system with the following, seemingly simple, requirements:

    The solution must:

    1. Run on a Linux host server
    2. Be clientless - require no installation or configuration on the user end
    3. Secure login - login names and passwords must not be cleartext
    4. Support download and upload - from the client side must save to a specified existing location on the host network
    5. Display an existing file structure - files saved to an existing network drive must be displayed to the web
    6. Run on a "in house" server
    7. Support large files ~ 1gb transferred and uploaded
    8. Users must only interact only with pages their group memberships allow
    9. Authenticate on an existing LDAP db

    It doesn't seem like a lot to ask... If anyone has any suggestions please don't hold back.

  66. HyperContent? by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

    Would HyperContent do the trick for you?

    http://hypercontent.sourceforge.net/

    (Disclaimer: I used an early version of this from a year ago; I don't know how well it currently stacks up against what you're comparing it to...)

  67. Re:w00t by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Having the word "psot" in a /. message that short should set off the lameness filter.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  68. OpenDocMan by LogArt00 · · Score: 1

    An option is OpenDocMan (my project). It is a simple file management system without a lot of the overhead: http://www.opendocman.com/

  69. Let your vendor do it? Novell? by QX-Mat · · Score: 1

    People keep saying Novell is dead. I keep on telling them that Netware is little more than glorified policies, and it's questions like this that reenforce my view.

    Netware is a great product for controlling users. Netware is a great product (fantastic, in fact) for application role outs over a network, on demand
    Netware is also a fantastic 'suite' of programs.

    Check out,

    http://www.liv.ac.uk/csd/mobile/netstore.html

    My uni, clearly, uses Novell.

    Sometimes it's easier to user what your vendor supplies than it is to craft your own. I say this, am I am 'the' () foremost interoperativity bloke, hacking qmail, imap courier, apache and sqmail into a bespoke single login system. The problem with my usual apporach, is although it's exactly what I want, it takes time. My time is better spent on other issues, and therefore, I rely on vendors to do the best they can.

    Has anyone seem Mandrake/Madrivalyswhatever's server install? Advx, their high-performance apache install is fantastic.

    http://www.advx.org/

    It does what I would have made myself, but I didnt, and thus, I used my time wisely.

    Matt

  70. Online File Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a free online file sharing tool that I've used before.

  71. When i was in college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    W@hen i was in college our storage consisted of two desk drawers... and we didn't complain, and we won a world war....

    At the Soviet college, Data stores you.

    All your files are belong to us

    Where can I store my Icy Hot Stuntaz CD?

    1.Find a file that needs to be stored

    2.Discover a way to store it

    3.???

    4. Priceless, er, I mean Profit

  72. Novell iFolder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on your University's server software, some options might already be available. Someone posted a M*crosoft option already.

    If your school uses Novell-based technologies, then you may want to look at iFolder. The client portion is OSS, but I don't think the server portion is. It works with M*crosoft and Linux clients, although it does say "Novell Linux Desktop" (ie: SuSE).

    http://www.novell.com/products/ifolder/overview.ht ml

  73. Novell's NetStorage by artoo · · Score: 1

    It's not open source, but it's a nice product, and Novell tends to give educational institutions decent discounts. I believe you can set it up to use any LDAP source for authentication, but even if that's not true, you can sync eDirectory and Active directory to solve that problem.

    It might not fit your environment, but it's something to look into.

    1. Re:Novell's NetStorage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe NetStorage became iFolder, which is GPL.

  74. Depends upon the projected load... by Leomania · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the server is going to be busy, OS X probably wouldn't be a good choice. AnandTech had a review of OS X as a server OS and found it couldn't keep up with Linux as the number of connections increased beyond a certain threshold.

    Just something to consider; it will undoubtedly improve in the future, but for now a FOSS solution would likely suffice and not have this limitation.

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    1. Re:Depends upon the projected load... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ans the conclusion was ...

      Mac OS X is incredibly slow, between 2 and 5(!) times slower, in creating new threads, as it doesn't use kernel threads, and has to go through extra layers (wrappers). No need to continue our search: the G5 might not be the fastest integer CPU on earth - its database performance is completely crippled by an asthmatic operating system that needs up to 5 times more time to handle and create threads.

      Workstation apps will hardly mind, but the performance of server applications depends greatly on the threading, signalling and locking engine. With the data that we have today, I think that a PowerPC optimised Linux such as Yellow Dog is a better idea for the Xserve than Mac OS X server.

    2. Re:Depends upon the projected load... by dafz1 · · Score: 1

      Linux has a problem with AFP(Apple File Protocol). We had some file servers running Windows 2000, that we decided we to transition to Linux, due to virus frustration, increased security, and better reliability. In our mixed platform environment, we samba and AFP(netatalk) share folders. Frequently, certain files, mostly Power Point and Word docs, would appear corrupted when they were tried to be opened on a Mac, after being being changed on a Windows machine(or vice versa). I don't want to start a "M$ Sucks" war, but my users HAVE to be able to cross-platform share documents.

      The reality, for me, is Linux doesn't support AFP to the point it's reliable. All the speed in the world isn't going to help when people are calling me saying a file is corrupt.

  75. The best of the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://phpatm.free.fr/

    *mutliple users
    *automatic account registeration
    *highly customizable
    *great community
    *tons of mods
    *restrict file size
    *give users own folders
    *limit storage per user
    *limit file types
    *free/open source
    *no database required, all flat file

  76. Re:priorities by vanye · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    Actaully I thought it was "If Gabriel doesn't get to roller-blade to the Chelsea piers, then the terrorists have won".

  77. Re:priorities by cofaboy · · Score: 1

    Get real mate, hitler, IRA (US sponsored) and now AQ, barbaric yes worthy of off-topic? 'Course not Bring 'em on bring 'em on. Are we scared? Piss off are we

    --
    In the end, It's all bovine dung you know
  78. iFolder??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.novell.com/products/ifolder/

    This can either have a client based on Mono or web based. This allows for versioning as well.

  79. Re:priorities by aoteoroa · · Score: 5, Informative

    A barbaric attack has just occurred in London and you guys are blabbing on about OSS Web-based File Management? GET SOME PRIORITIES!

    This is a forum for discussing technical issues. If you want to talk about current issues, or popular news items go to
    K5 or
    Fark

  80. Novell iFolder is GPL by Spider-X · · Score: 2, Informative

    Novell iFolder is the best, most secure I've ever seen. And, it's GPL. Here's the URL:

    http://www.ifolder.com/

    --
    witty sig goes here
  81. SSL Explorer by Shadow_139 · · Score: 2, Informative

    SSL Explorer is exactly what you are looking for and they have just released a new updated verion 0.1.12 with include RADIUS. Hosted on SourceForge.net

    It has WebDAV, VNC, Citrix, Rdesktop (Linux), Windows RDP Client, Web Forwarding, SSL Tunnelling and alot more.

    You can set the password with RADIUS, Active Directory or a in-buit DB. All been encrypted under SSL with the ability for multiple SSL Cert's

    I have been using to for a while now in the big company and it works a dream, plus getting better with each update.

    All Web base with optional VPN (Java) Client, with some screen keyboard for security from keyloggers and usability e.g. Palm/PocketPC/SmartPhone, Public Kiosk, etc. All you need is a Web Browser and away you go......

  82. Moodle is almost there by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1
    LDAP authentication is standard, and we're working on a WebDAV enabled file manager for teachers and students which should be ready in the next few weeks.

    Moodle LMS

  83. Davenport and Samba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A problem with just Apache and mod_dav is that apache runs as one user id and all the files have to read/writeable by the web server. If you want to allow people to have access to their existing home directories then you need to have a webdav gateway that know how to interacte with that existing filesystem.

    Davenport http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ is a webdav gateway to SMB shares. So that solves the issue of dealing with user permissions that apache/mod_dav can't do.

  84. Open Source Portfolio by howlatthemoon · · Score: 1

    You might look at OSPI their content repository for the portfolio reminds me a lot of Xythos. I have been trying to get our central storage people to take a look and give me some feedback on whether I am right or wrong.

  85. Re:Easy... Check out HotScripts.com by jbarr · · Score: 1

    Programming your own, while not overly difficult, is probably out of the question for his purpose. There are many PHP-based solutions available, all with varying degrees of complexity and functions. Try browsing to:

    http://hotscripts.com/PHP/Scripts_and_Programs/Fil e_Manipulation/File_Management/index.html

    Lots of goodies to choose from...

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  86. What about Sakai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it may be a little overkill but back when I implimented sharepoint it was the closest thing I could find to an open source alternative.

  87. About to deploy a WebDAV-based file service... by agt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our university is about to roll out a web-accessible file service based on Apache+WebDAV+local patches. Please send me email at (my slashdot username)@ucsd.edu if you're interested and I'll be happy to discuss.

    1. Re:About to deploy a WebDAV-based file service... by Ass+Feces+II · · Score: 1

      Here is his email, just in case you want a clickable link:

      agt@ucsd.edu

  88. gmail or wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or maybe just say 'i quit' and become a window washer

  89. Give me VPN by utlemming · · Score: 1

    Well Web file access is nice, as my University uses it, I would be a whole lot more happy if I had VPN access. With the number of people that have laptops in class (heck I am writing this well in class), and the number of people that haul a laptop around campus, and even those that have a computer at home, VPN access to a home directory would be heaven sent. Instead of having to transfer files via web-base application, transfering the files like it was a local drive would be so much more convient. The, other thing that VPN access would provide is shared files which are needed could be made avialable. For example, my school uses the "J" drive for IS majors -- we use this for submitting projects, getting information, etc. Having the J drive available from home would be great.

    So the point is, if you are going to offer a web based service, for transfering files, offer a complete package that will be convient and easy to use. If you are going to offer a home directory, then allow them to have access to thing that they would have if they were on campus. Nothing is more frustrating that having the look of being able to get to information and data, but you can't because of some arbitrary restriction.

    --
    The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  90. yet another dupe by spoonyfork · · Score: 4, Informative
    Don't forget to check the previous Ask Slashdot discussion on this very topic titled Open Source Web-Based File Management? from 2/17/05.

    That said, I would suggest doing some searches on various other sites whose opinion you value. Chances are it has been asked there before as well.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  91. Webadmin + SSL by div_2n · · Score: 1

    Use SSL to encrypt, a simple web authentication (choose your flavor) and webadmin.

    http://wacker-welt.de/webadmin/

    You can create individual webadmin upload/download pages for each person and redirect them upon logging in to their own page based on their login creditials using PHP.

    I've done it before and it works great. Although I've found my implementation craps out with files over an undetermined size. I haven't researched if this is a webadmin issue or some setting I have on the HTTP/SSL server.

  92. DocMGR by elawman · · Score: 1
    You can try DocMGR (my project) at http://docmgr.sourceforge.net/.

    Features in no particular order:

    • Web-Based. Supports all major browsers
    • Multiple language support
    • Supports document workflow
    • Has a summary page to monitor recently added files you've checked out, Bookmarked collections, etc
    • Built on a modular system to allow easy addition/removal of features
    • Email, and anonymous email sending
    • md5 file verification on viewing
    • File Checkin/checkout.
    • File discussion forums for each file
    • Full text search and keyword search. You can also optionally add tsearch2 support for advanced full text indexing and search
    • Fine-grained file and collection permissions based on per-user or per-group authentication
    • WebDAV support. This works for browsing and copying, but not for checking out files (yet)
    • It's been around for a while and has a decent size user base
    • Zipped collection download


    There's more, but I'm tired of typing and you get the picture...
  93. GIT er done. by NCamero · · Score: 1

    Just ask Linus and GIT will become the bitkeeper of your dreams.

    Actually, I remember Linus writing that Linux/GNU really needs a network file system with LDAP like features.

  94. Xythos vs. Zope by TomGrantAtXythos · · Score: 1

    As a card-carrying member of Xythos Software, I feel compelled to point out an important functional distinction between Xythos Digital Locker and Zope.

    • Xythos Digital Locker: A desktop- and web-based tool for document collaboration.
    • Zope: A template-driven tool for building web sites.

    The two might be very complementary in a hypothetical deployment. Zope could provide the web site view of a lot of content, some of it in Xythos. There's also a new Xythos solution that adds "basic document management" features like document classes, custom metadata, and workflow.

    P.S. This is not an advertisement. Since I'm in product management, I'm always interested in how people might want to use Xythos, and I welcome feedback here or privately via e-mail. No salesperson will call you.

    1. Re:Xythos vs. Zope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that Silva on top of Zope may be a bit closer to Xythos than Plone on top of Zope, but I may misunderstand what Xythos does.

    2. Re:Xythos vs. Zope by TomGrantAtXythos · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking of a web site created with Zope being a portal view on content in Xythos (files and folders). Zope is therefore "on top" of Xythos, along with any other content repositories to which it points (including its own fragments that Zope assembles into the web site).

  95. Re:hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why I browse with a +5 Troll modifier.

    lolz

  96. FileAngel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked on this project a little a few years back during a summer one time. Looks like development has died (I think they cancelled the project after all the interns left that summer), but it's OSS and a lot of the buzzwords you dropped match the buzzwords I heard when I was working on it.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/fileangel/

  97. Re:priorities by Phil06 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fine, but if you had used a dissenting voice like this in Iraq, you and your family members would be dead, killed by the Saddams secret police. You get to chose which side you are on, freedom or tyranny, the people of Baghdad had no choice. Which side are you on?

    --
    "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
  98. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is a forum for discussing technical issues. If you want to talk about current issues, or popular news items go to
    ...and yet there was a bit of a to-do made when the same group of idiots flew airplanes into a couple of office buildings in the U.S. a few years back. Funny how priorities can vary like that.
  99. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you complaining every day of what appen in Irak? No. So why are you complain about Londons?

  100. Re:priorities by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    And you are on slashdot reading this thread because?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  101. probably give this one a try ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't used it myself but probaby this is useable for you:

    http://www.open-steam.org/

  102. PHP File Manager by hwk_br · · Score: 1

    take a look at php filemanager (http://phpfm.sf.net/ it has very good fatures, it's single file and the integration depends only on apache's

    --
    \m/
  103. Re:priorities by scovetta · · Score: 1

    ...and yet there was a bit of a to-do made when the same group of idiots flew airplanes into a couple of office buildings in the U.S. a few years back. Funny how priorities can vary like that.

    As I recall, there were, in fact, other /. postings that day, too.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  104. Re:priorities by Ravatar · · Score: 1

    You're exactly right! We should all halt daily activity, to send the right message to the attackers..

  105. Anytime/Anywhere drive by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the problem I had, and how I solved it:

    1) We're a small software company, and we're *VERY* mobile. I joke that my office is my laptop, but it's not much of a joke. we can (and do) work almost anywhere we have power + 'net connection.

    2) We need to have a common file store primarily for backups, but also so that we can share files and documents easily.

    3) WebDAV is close. Windows support for WebDAV falls short of actually mounting the drive. (EG: with a drive letter) This creates lots of little headaches copying files, some programs won't open files directly from a DAV folder, etc...

    4) I found a utility put out by Novell, a free download, called "NetDrive" that lets you mount a WebDAV share as a drive on the local system. Google for NetDrive

    5) This, combined with Apache/WebDAV/Mod_SSL makes an easy, reliable, secure, mountable drive that mounts anywhere an HTTPS connection is allowed. (which almost *ALL* firewalls allow)

    I'm not using LDAP authentication. There are only 5 of us, and we don't hire/fire all that often.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Anytime/Anywhere drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, NetDrive appears not to be free, technically. According to the comments on this article, NetDrive is a Novell product that is covered under the Novell (Netware?) 6 license. :(

    2. Re:Anytime/Anywhere drive by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Informative

      nice.
      I havent used it, but appears you can do the same using gmail instead, GMAILFS http://www.viksoe.dk/code/gmail.htm

      or the open source version:

      http://pgd.sourceforge.net/

    3. Re:Anytime/Anywhere drive by thing12 · · Score: 1

      If you're wondering... the reason you have to Google for NetDrive rather than just downloading it from Novell is that NetDrive is licenced as part of Netware. So it's not exactly "free". But it's funny, Novell even tells you to go download it off the net.

    4. Re:Anytime/Anywhere drive by realkiwi · · Score: 1

      Things will get easier when you upgrade those portable computers to iBooks running Mac OS X.

      --
      realkiwi
  106. Re:priorities by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's barbaric when it happens in London, but when it happens constantly in Israel you don't even blink.

    Bombs in London are barbaric but rape victims having no legal protection in Saudi Arabia doesn't bother you.

    There's a Genocide happening in Sudan - what have you done to stop it?

    Read tech news, get smart, get power, and use it all to go do some fucking good in this world.

    --
    World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
  107. Write Your Own -- As a Wiki Extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that this would be a great extension to the capabilities of a Wiki software package, such as Wikipedia's MediaWiki.

    In addition to the ability to edit the page, the Wiki would allow you to upload a file. For an example of uploading files to a server in a PHP application (such as MediaWiki), see SquirrelMail.

    When you did upload a file, the web page would be modified with a link to the file. Other functions, with appropriately named links, would allow you to delete a file, replace a file, add a link to an already-uploaded file on another page, and so on.

    Of course, whatever protection is deemed necessary, such as authorizations and approvals, would also be built in (e.g. for uploading, downloading, renaming, linking, and deleting).

    Doing this in a Wiki has a lot of advantages:

    1. It works in any browser, and it is fairly intuitive to use.

    2. As with Wikipedia, the Wiki pages can include instructions, and links to tutorials, on how to use the file storage.

    3. It avoids the need to come up with a one-size-fits-all file hierarchy up front. The real world always seems to resist hierarchical categorization, and the Wiki solves this, since the same file can be linked from various pages. For example, a file that is the result of a collaboration can be linked from the pages for both authors/artists.

    4. It allows the creation of other pages that reference the files, such as reviews, best-of lists, and so on.

  108. Yahoo briefcase by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1

    What about Yahoo Briefcase? 30 megs storage for free with a web interface, pretty simple to use, works from any browser, blah, blah, blah.

  109. Owl by jehreg · · Score: 1

    Have a quick look at http://owl.sourceforge.net/ , it might be just what the doctor ordered.

  110. iFolder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out www.ifolder.com

  111. Apache Lenya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apache Lenya http://lenya.apache.org/ is an Open Source Java/XML Content Management System and comes with revision control, site management, scheduling, search, WYSIWYG editors, and workflow

  112. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As I recall, there were, in fact, other /. postings that day, too.
    Oh look, you're right: there were three other stories. Alongside seven relating to the WTC attacks.
    • Further Updates On Terrorist Attack
    • First-Person Account Of Today's Attacks
    • More Links And Reports On Terrorist Attacks
    • Our New Pearl Harbor
    • U.S. Attack -- More Updates
    • Attacks On US Continued Reports
    • World Trade Towers and Pentagon Attacked
    • Rebel.com Autopsy
    • Linus to speak on "The Origins of Linux"
    • Science: One Last mission For Deep Space 1

  113. Re:priorities by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    This is a forum for discussing technical issues.

    Errrr... no it isn't. Last time I checked articles on 9/11 and manga were posted but they certainly weren't technical.

    Now I don't have a problem with Slashdot not reporting on the London bombs (I do actually live there) but if significant non-technical American news or Taco's non-technical hobby is posted then I can understand how some people might get a little upset if significant non-American events aren't posted.

    What I'm trying to say is this isn't a technical forum at all, its Taco's and he can pretty much post what he wants - technical or not. Trying to justify a lack of some article in this way doesn't work so please don't try to do it.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  114. WebDAV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows support for WebDAV is attrocious.

  115. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe it or not:
    Ignore Iraq
    Bomb Iraq
    are not the only two options.

    Diplomacy was NOT going well, but we should probably put a little more consideration into it before going to war.

  116. iFolder from who? Novell by cornice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Novell has GPLed their file sharing system and renamed it iFolder:

    http://www.ifolder.com/


    iFolder is a file sharing application for Linux, Windows, and Mac.

    Using iFolder workgroup features, you can easily:

    * Share files across multiple computers
    * Share files with other users

    Used with an iFolder server, you can:

    * Maintain a backup of your files on an iFolder Enterprise server
    * Share files with other users and computers
    * Restore deleted files from Backup

  117. Re:priorities by Aldric · · Score: 1

    There's an article about it just down the front page with 1800+ responses.

  118. Re:priorities by jd · · Score: 1
    As a Brit, I'll add my 2 ECUs worth here - London is either under attack or subject to self-inflicted disasters pretty much on a constant basis. The last time King's Cross had this kind of level of death toll, it was from a discarded match. Kinda puts things in perspective, when a single discarded match can kill as many people as an international terrorist organization!


    (Actually, if you want to discuss technology and disasters, I'd be far more inclined to discuss the Piper Alpha disaster, when a backflow up a pipe caused the oil rig to explode, killing several hundred. Either that, or maybe a good discussion on why a few bazillion security cameras and one of the most sophisticated anti-terrorist computer networks in the world didn't make a damn bit of difference.)


    But to get back ON topic, I've never been keen on web-based file management, as web-based tools are crappy at sending files. (HTTP is not elegent when it comes to bulk data, which means you're forced to mix protocols, and often the overheads of mix-n-match systems are higher than the benefits.)


    Probably the best you can do is have a secure Java applet (so you get to run the remote machine) that is a GUI wrapper for rsync or fsp. (No, that's not a typo. fsp is a connectionless variant of ftp and tends to have a better reputation for this kind of work.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  119. +5 Interesting??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this comment have to do with OSS Web-based file management?

    Moderators, do you fucking jobs!!! This in no way deserves to be modded up. It is offtopic, and should be modded accordingly.

  120. Re:priorities by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    terror a state of irrational fear.

    terrorism the practice of causing terror to achieve political goals.

    So are you allowing the terrorists to have their way with you? People need to realize that the goal of terrorism is to scare people, not to actually kill people. Remember Bill O'Reilly's (I think) intervie with Sami al-Arian? The guy defined "Death to Israel" as death to its ideology, not necessarily to any real people.

    We need to let those who can (government, army, police, etc.) handle the problem, and live our life normally. Then we have truly defeated them. GET SOME PRIORITIES!

  121. Askemos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Askemos is almost there - and GPL.

    It's an intrusion resistant, non-repudiable and incorruptible system.

    WebDAV to be released the other day.

  122. Re:priorities by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

    hmm, Didn't I see your troll on FARK just a few minutes ago?

  123. .LRN by tdxdave · · Score: 2, Informative

    .LRN is a web based community system for universities that has group based file sharing with a web user interface and WebDAV support. It also supports LDAP authentication. If that's too much, the OpenACS platform .LRN is built on has all the features your are looking for in file sharing, access control and authentication.

  124. Re:priorities by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    There's an article about it just down the front page with 1800+ responses.

    Missed that as I'd filtered out politics ... however it does prove my point that Slashdot isn't exclusively technology based :)

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  125. Re:priorities by Yankel · · Score: 1

    It's ironic that some try to smear you as trolling by replying to a comment which wasn't even modded as a troll.

    Besides, if you posted this insightful comment in the thread that was actually discussing the attack on London this morning:

    - it would have been buried in the flood of comments (nearly at 2000 now, I think)

    - it probably would have been marked as a troll by some jerks who thought it wasn't discussing the issue at hand either (when you were, BTW).

    People are afraid to admit the double standard: Israel must shut up and take everything that's thrown, shot, propelled and blown up at her, while everyone else is allowed to defend themselves.

    --
    --- Dan
  126. The REAL solution by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    -web accessible storage
    -money is tight

    Tell all the students to get that you have a special relationship with GMail, and that they all need to sign up for their free storage. Teach them how to use their mail reader to store and retrieve files.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  127. Re:priorities by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You are either against the killing of innocents, or you are against us.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  128. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  129. Windows-based file management by kderby2000 · · Score: 1

    If you've already got a copy of Windows 2003 server running somewhere, it comes with a 'free' copy of Windows SharePoint Services; it's an aspx-driven set of web pages that's basically a dumbed-down version of SharePoint. It's actually fairly nice.

  130. Re:priorities by pvera · · Score: 1
    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  131. University of Calgary does this well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The University of Calgary IT department had a similar task. Not finding any suitable tools to do this, they developed their own called Webdisk. It is a web folder accessible through FTP and the standard methods, but they also tie access to it into all U of C computers through a mapped drive. As well, they offer a program to map this webdisk drive to your home computer.

    It's based on WebDAV, and works on Windows, Macs, and Linux. There is a PPT on this website that explains everything quite well (especially how they cam to develop it.) http://www.ucalgary.ca/it/self_help/webdisk/

    I have to say that one thing I've generally been pleased with here at the UofC is the IT department, and the Webdisk is one reason why. It's very common to see all types of students making use of it, since it's such an intuitive system, mainly since it ties right into Windows Explorer.

  132. Re:iFolder from who? Novell by ConeFish · · Score: 1

    This looks great as a free client and for a workgroup environment. But, if you want to have the server for this, it looks like you will have to cough up at least $995:

    http://www.novell.com/products/openenterpriseserve r/pricing.html

    --
    The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they are when you kill them.
  133. As usual... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    ...comments by people who don't know what they're talking about.

    Do you even know what a content management system is? Did you bother to look at what the Xythos software actually does before commenting on something else's ability to replace it?

    Certainly not. If you had, this wouldn't be Slashdot, would it?

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  134. Re:iFolder from who? Novell by ConeFish · · Score: 1

    After digging deeper, I found this information about how to set up their "SimpleServer" and avoid having to purchase the whole suite:

    http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/cvs/cvsbrows e.php/*checkout*/ifolder/ifolder/HOWTOs/SimpleServ er-Setup-HOWTO.txt

    --
    The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they are when you kill them.
  135. Re:priorities by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Why did you leave out the barbaric things happening to the palestenians? For every israeli killed by a palestenian there are two to three palestenians killed by israelis.

    For that matter the barbaric things happening in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Just because an army does the killing it doesn't make it right.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  136. http://wfm.sf.net by zeph1ro · · Score: 1

    check this... it is integrated with apache, OWASP php filters, and mod_mysql_auth...
    i should try LDAP too... anyway, you can use whatever browser/OS that supports a little of javascript and frames

  137. Re:priorities by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 1

    I didn't mention them because I didn't think the original poster would care about the Palestinians. They fall under the category of 'starving foreign dark-skinned people' for most folks.

    I happen to think it's a damn tragedy that they've been pushed as far as they have.

    --
    World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
  138. Re:priorities by Shardin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No offense to my brothers over in London - but there were a couple more than 50 people dead in the World Trade Center attacks. 50 lives is 50 lives, and my heart goes out to those who are no longer with us and their families. But to compare the two attacks is like comparing my Aunt's 2kb personal address book getting eaten by a failed pen drive to Wikipedia's database getting sacked by a stray patriot missile. Are both horrible attrocities? Absolutely - but it's certainly not fair to compare the two.

  139. Re:priorities by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Could be because /. was one of the only fringey-mainstream sites still usable that day?

  140. Just let Gmail supply it by Karcaw · · Score: 1

    There are a few implementations of Google Mail filesystems. Here is one http://pgd.sourceforge.net/ that is all webbased. Install it and let google handle the space issues.

  141. [OT]:Re:priorities by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
    Count me in the "against us" category

    That sort of attitude would end up with the world under the thumb of anyone willing to hide behind people you deem innocents... I mean, your are just begging someone to force you to be ruled by a ruthless person with that sort of attitude.

    War is a horrific thing, but lots of incredibly innocent people died during WWII, and in the end a lot of really bad things were ended because of it. If being militant about not killing a single innocent were a prerequesite, the world would currently be under fascism Nazi style. There would have been nothing would could have done to stop the bad folks, if collateral damage was completely unacceptable.

    I'm not saying that the War in Iraq is a good thing. To be blantantly honest, I'm not sure. In the 50-100 year view, I think it will be good, but I think we are doing it for all the wrong reasons. I think the American public was mislead in order to drum up support. I think both of those really undercut any potential goodwill I can summon for the Iraqi effort.

    So while I won't argue with you if about if you feel what we did is immoral, and that we attacked a soverign nation with very little legimate need to. I feel that your attitude about "innocents" is more then a bit naive. It's downright stupid in terms of national policy.

    Kirby

    1. Re:[OT]:Re:priorities by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Ok.

      Here is your knife, and there is the baby. Protect our National Interest!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:[OT]:Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adds a new meaning to 'baby oil'...

    3. Re:[OT]:Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait. how does abortion protect national interest?

  142. Re:iFolder from who? Novell by craXORjack · · Score: 1

    $995 is pretty cheap. How much do you think you have to pay for other server products? Not to mention the "client access license" fees that many companies wring from your pocketbook.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  143. Horde by timigoe · · Score: 1

    www.horde.org - I use it on my server and for a company who's network I manage. Between the users, there are some tech savy and some not - they can all manage with it. Horde itself (version 3.0) can do all sorts - with the framework installed, you add on various modules to perform the functionality needed. There is a 'filemanager' which allows basic and advanced FTP abilities from a simple web page.

    --
    Tim (http://tim.igoe.me.uk)
    Computers are like Air-con, open windows and they stop working!
  144. BioCoRE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This might be quite-the-overkill, but I have to at least suggest it: biocore.ks.uiuc.edu.

    This is actually an entire collaborative environment, allowing for group segregation, file sharing, etc., and is great for classroom use. If you take the simple tour (http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/biocore/tour/) you can see what I'm talking about.

  145. Re:priorities by sbeashwar · · Score: 0

    That makes me wonder, I've never been moded a decent score for any of my posts. I wonder if /. is programed to boost your karma if the f word is used no matter how relevant/irrelevant your post amy be. Let me try ... fucking fuck fucked fucker

  146. Just don't do it by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, you think you want it, but you don't.
    In a university based setting, it will get used for homework and illegal purposes like copyright infringement.
    The illegal purposes will require massive bandwidth. The homework will just be a support nightmare when there's file corruption or server downtime. People working on projects overnight, last minute, etc and suddenly they can't get their files anymore

  147. How I did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Apache mod_dav + a custom Perl authenication module to do something similar to what you are doing.

    We allow lecturers at our uni to publish subject materials using WebDAV. Perl auth handler controls who is allowed to upload ie limit POST/ MKCOL verbs (there may be others, I cant remember) to those allowed to write.
    Each subject has its own folder, which in your scenario could be one folder per student.

    If you use the LDAP authentication features in Apache 2, then your perl auth hander will be pretty simple. Just check Apache username and return based on some simple logic.

  148. Samhita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the Samhita offering at DBSentry Corp. Its a very robust document management system built using Oracle technology. They are not averse to giving out sourcecode to the customers. Most interesting feature is that the product comes as preinstalled, preconfigured appliance.

  149. Re:priorities by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

    This is a forum for discussing technical issues.

    You must be new here.

    --
    Stop the world; I need to get off.
  150. Re:priorities by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 1

    MOD PARENT UP - he swore!

    I sorta hope that's not the reason I got good mod points. If it is, well, once everyone finds out about that this whole place might get a lot more fun.

    --
    World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
  151. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... who is dismayed that university students allegedly can't learn to use an FTP client? This isn't rocket science - presumably the thing they are actually *studying* is around 5 or 6 orders of magnitude more complex than just using an FTP program somebody else already wrote.

    If they can't pick that up in 60 seconds or so, maybe they don't belong at a university no matter what their actual area of study.

  152. Silk might be what's called for here by TenseElvis · · Score: 1

    Silk sounds close. www.silk-project.org. It's an OSS collaborate content management system. It has the WebDAV, and Active Directory/LDAP integration. J2EE based (comes with JBoss), runs on any OS that's on Sun's JVM compatibility list. I don't know if the WebDAV will work when run on a Mac... I don't think that's been tested. Silk still has a few rough edges, but it sounds pretty close to what's being asked for here.

  153. oss prog called docmgr by bazooka_foo · · Score: 1

    Docmgr looks like it will do what you want. http://sourceforge.net/projects/docmgr/ (from the site) A PHP/Postgresql based document management system (DMS) with pdf and ocr-based indexing, and optional tsearch2 support. It also has access control lists, user permissions assignment, file discussion board, and multi-level file grouping.

  154. Two big apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also work for a college, and we're in the process of upgrading our webmail offerings. I have seen that both Horde (PHP) and OpenWebmail (Perl) both have some sort of web-based file access, both can authenticate using LDAP, and both are free open source (I think GNU GPL but I can't remember).

  155. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning bored Kiwi found playing with trolls under a bridge. Known to be associated with AL quackduck.

    Why do you care what happened in London? You are obviously a New Zealander. Do you think no one on slashdot is smart enough to know That your name is the Maori name for New Zealand or "The Land of the Long White Cloud"

    You guys are just bored cause nothing happens down there! That's why you have to get involved in everyone else's politics so you don't feel left out.

  156. Re: window washer by bonezed · · Score: 1

    now that sounds like a good idea

    though I think I'd prefer something like a bus driver or ferry driver job

    --
    ---- Put Sig here:
  157. winscp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have came up with a wonderful solution. I use SCP to transfer files (winSCP on win machines) and it works flawlessly. It's way simpler than any FTP client (don't know why, but FTP clients confuse me). And for my understanding, SCP is much more secure than FTP transfer. Of course you want to run the SSH server on a *nix box.

  158. Samba + Apache + mod_WebDAV + Kerberos by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    Don't reinvent the wheel, unless you absolutely want to. It may be simpler to go with exactly what you are asking for: Apache+WebDAV, Samba, LDAP/Kerberos.

    Content management systems like Knowledge Tree may be great, if that's what you want to do -- complex content management with document metadata and expiry dates, etc. However, keep in mind that it is something extra for your users to figure out and something extra to be monitored or repaired when things go south.

    Samba will let your clients connect to the file server in a way they're presumably already familiar with: their desktop's file system. Nothing new to learn except how to connect and, maybe, which folder to put things in if they are to be visible on the web.

    Mod_WebDAV can be added to Apache so users have an alternate route to edit their files.

    Both Samba and Apache can be tied to LDAP and/or Kerberos so that you can use your existing authentication and directory services.

    I've set up a small number of Apache,WebDAV,Samba, Kerberos systems. The main drawback is that once users know how to connect, it's too easy for them compared to the old CMS which was being used as a file management system. That may make them feel they are missing something. They may even forget they have a "file management" system even while they are using it. No joke. So plan on scheduling time at the end of the project to make sure the users know what they have and that the management appreciates how smooth it is to use. And that you get credit for not having to go to heroic effort to fix things every time a student wants to upload a file. Otherwise it may end up like the proverbial walled-in Netware server.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  159. Davenport by sita · · Score: 1

    You could look at Davenport. It is a webdav to smb gateway. The nice thing with it compared to mod_webdav is that if you run Samba + Davenport the file ownership on the server is not that of the web server, but that of the actual user, meaning that NFS will serve the files with the same ownership as well.

    Maybe this is possible with mod_webdav too, but it wasn't obvious to me. With Davenport it was.

    http://davenport.sourceforge.net/

  160. SchoolTool might help by MikePickus · · Score: 1

    SchoolTool is a project to develop a common global school administration infrastructure that is freely available under an Open Source licence. http://www.schooltool.org/ Mike

  161. You just mentioned everything you need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apache2/WebDav

    I suggest the auth_kerberos module for windows authentication if you can. IIRC the LDAP module can authenticate off of active directory, but I could be wrong. You could also setup an ftp server (authenticate via PAM/kerberos) to access their files.

    University of Nebraska at Omaha does this. You can access WebDAV or SMB or (I beleive) FTP. It's done via commercial software, but everything is freely available.

  162. SSL-Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SSL Explorer allows AD-integrated access to SMB files via any web browser, and also allows web folder views for people still using IE. It also allows for limited SSL VPN tunnels. http://www.sslexplorer.com/

  163. Re:Winblows manages to screw everything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

    I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

    If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

    To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

    Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

    More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one.

    Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

    More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean,

  164. web-ftp by gozar · · Score: 1

    Web-ftp might be a solution. You run it on your web server, and it can connect to multiple ftp servers. The clients can connect of SSL, and you don't have to worry about installing any software on the client machines. Your ftp servers don't even need to be made accessible on the Internet (but they need to be accessible to the web server :-).

    --
    What, me worry?