... evil as possible. There are fake certs for Google, and Apple refuses to protect their users against them. That's pretty much the internet company version of sending machetes to ISIS.
She's not really calling for social justice, she's a right wing politician.
What offends her is not that Apple makes money from countries where people discriminate against women and gays, what offends her is not that the government has alliances with countries where people discriminate against women and gays - no one thinks that president Fiona would break off relations with the whole middle east and Africa.
What she means is that she hates liberals for caring about gays at all. Ie., she's against liberal social justice.
That she's so confused that she supports the feminist half of it, but attacks all of it should make it clear why you shouldn't vote for the right. Too emotional, too tribal to make any sense at all.
British culture has always seemed the most paranoid in the world about children and sex. I once found a website claiming that the world's most innocent cartoons that have young girls in them (for instance "Kiki's delivery service" - and no I'm not joking) should be banned because a pedophile could gain enjoyment from watching the girl in it.. It was a British blog, but I could tell that before checking because of the insane paranoia.
But, here's the odd part, they're also the country least successful in preventing the sexual exploitation of children. Look up "grooming gangs" in a google news search. They're paranoid about this stuff, but not willing to confront Pakistani or Somali or whatever immigrants over actual abuse.
No, the logic of the article is "now that she knows that I cheated I am forced to continue cheating forever, because F**K HER what makes her think she has a say. Because the guy who told on me is a traitor and we can't reward traitors. Also I'll send him to the hospital if he comes out of hiding"
So the principle is "the public must be denied all power!"???
How did Snowden force their hand, since they're refusing to end the data collection program? He forced them to keep it? Because now that the public knows, the public must be denied freedom at all costs? Because F**K the public, keep the public from having any say is the principle?
characters. Because the entropy of one word out of 7776 is almost as high as two english keyboard characters. So any, say 7 word passphrase could be shortened to a 14 character password without losing any entropy.
But you'd need a program to convert between the two.
You miss the point, doubling the number of words only gives you one more bit per word, but makes looking up a word from dice too hard.
To be more specific, this dictionary is about 9 bits per word. If you used a 100,000 word webster's dictionary that's about 11 bits per word - it's not that many more bits.
Slashdot Mirror
into naked pics of celebrities and post it on 4chan. It will be around forever.
fake certs from them. Did Apple do even that?
... evil as possible. There are fake certs for Google, and Apple refuses to protect their users against them. That's pretty much the internet company version of sending machetes to ISIS.
Why the hell do we have an "article" that just quotes an anonymous coward who is unclear on every concept related to the internet?
What the hell is wrong with Slashdot and Dice?
She's not really calling for social justice, she's a right wing politician.
What offends her is not that Apple makes money from countries where people discriminate against women and gays, what offends her is not that the government has alliances with countries where people discriminate against women and gays - no one thinks that president Fiona would break off relations with the whole middle east and Africa.
What she means is that she hates liberals for caring about gays at all. Ie., she's against liberal social justice.
That she's so confused that she supports the feminist half of it, but attacks all of it should make it clear why you shouldn't vote for the right. Too emotional, too tribal to make any sense at all.
Sex/masterbation addiction can lead to food addiction and breathing addiction. End it before it's too late.
The American version is to make it legal to refuse selling Pizza to gays.
British culture has always seemed the most paranoid in the world about children and sex. I once found a website claiming that the world's most innocent cartoons that have young girls in them (for instance "Kiki's delivery service" - and no I'm not joking) should be banned because a pedophile could gain enjoyment from watching the girl in it.. It was a British blog, but I could tell that before checking because of the insane paranoia.
But, here's the odd part, they're also the country least successful in preventing the sexual exploitation of children. Look up "grooming gangs" in a google news search. They're paranoid about this stuff, but not willing to confront Pakistani or Somali or whatever immigrants over actual abuse.
would be more successful.
Teletubbies tech!
I doubt they're that sophisticated yet.
Maybe one day they'll do that.
Are they going to have sweeping powers to break https so they can check the legality of all your web pages and downloads? Outlaw encryption?
What IS the point of comments like that anyway?
Can we ban all the assholes from the internet too? It's such an unpleasant place!
I saw it on a shelf at "the anarchist bookstore" about 10 years ago.
"unclear on the concept!"
While technically illegal, I don't know that anyone really cares as long as this information isn't used against normal citizens who aren't terrorists.
What? There IS NO CHINESE WALL BETWEEN THE NSA AND LEA AT ALL!!!
No, the logic of the article is "now that she knows that I cheated I am forced to continue cheating forever, because F**K HER what makes her think she has a say. Because the guy who told on me is a traitor and we can't reward traitors. Also I'll send him to the hospital if he comes out of hiding"
That's the logic of the article.
So the principle is "the public must be denied all power!"???
How did Snowden force their hand, since they're refusing to end the data collection program? He forced them to keep it? Because now that the public knows, the public must be denied freedom at all costs? Because F**K the public, keep the public from having any say is the principle?
characters. Because the entropy of one word out of 7776 is almost as high as two english keyboard characters. So any, say 7 word passphrase could be shortened to a 14 character password without losing any entropy.
But you'd need a program to convert between the two.
Uhm, if you do 10 words this way you've got over 128 bits of entropy.
By the way if you used a 65536 word dictionary instead you could get there in 8 words.
Oops, did natural log instead of base 2.
1 word out of 7776 is 13 bits.
You miss the point, doubling the number of words only gives you one more bit per word, but makes looking up a word from dice too hard.
To be more specific, this dictionary is about 9 bits per word. If you used a 100,000 word webster's dictionary that's about 11 bits per word - it's not that many more bits.
Reordered with glue words between them, they can. None of that reduces the entropy, not the way I calculated it.
Notice I used choose, not powers.
True enough.
Though you can do strange things like display a tiny hash picture when the user has finished - that can be a visual verification.