AC The UK is allowed to share access to US military bases in the UK.
The US can remove UK access to raw data gathered by the USA at any time for any reason.
The role of the US base in the UK stays the same.
The UK then gets no further US raw data gathered by the USA.
Thats US data to gift to other nations like the UK. Paid for by US tax payers. Not US data that the UK has any extra right to.
What the USA once shared from its global spying operations, the USA can stop sharing with the UK.
Nothing more about Ireland in real time.
The UK will then have to use its own spies globally, buy its own UK spy and mil communications/crypto satellite network.
Run its own nuclear submarines with 100% UK tech:)
Once US support stops the UK mil budget will need to grow very quickly.
Time for the GCHQ and BND to put in a budget for a lot more spy satellites this year.
Got the mil budget for a rush build on lots of new spy satellites this year?
Got the experts to design, place and use US grade spy satellites? Locations globally to get spy data in real time?
When the US raw data stops Germany and the Uk will have to fit in the collect it all gaps.
No more US tax payers giving away billions of $ each year in free mil/spy data to Eu nations.
All the EU nations with shared US bases will revert to US only use.
EU nations top staff will have their security clearances removed.
No more visits to the USA for the EU tops spy experts.
No more data, hardware, upgrades for EU spies from the USA.
When the USA turns off the flow of raw real time data what will EU nations do?
The BND needs the flow of US data everyday.
The GCHQ needs US support globally and US support in Ireland.
Ask their embassy staff to spy more globally and never get detected spying?
Send out EU spies around the world?
Ask France to share/risk its global spy networks in real time? Colonel Marc and Henri will say no to that.
Going full Communist allows the USA to talk away and fully support more loyal nations.
Nations like New Zealand, Japan, Poland.
Should the rest of the EU/NATO want to go full Communist then they will have to find another nation to offer them real time counterintelligence/intelligence as the US does now.
The US looked after NATO and nations in what is the EU for decades.
Their intelligence workers got the best US support, equipment and data. They got invited to the US to see US secrets and got to use US advancements.
The US supported the UK with equipment when the UK needed such support in Ireland. Full collection.
Now the UK forgets such real time US intelligence support in Ireland?
Now the same nations after decades of US tax payers support go full Communist?
Time for the US to find new friends it can trust to keep secrets and who will support the USA.
AC its not about predictive logic/cheating..
This is about the data set size sent to a user in real time. Can the ISP allow so much data to flow every game?
Can the series of tubes that is the "internet" all around the USA allow for so much data to flow down to new games in real time?
Will a much faster, wider series of tubes be needed with unlimited data?
How much data is needed at what download speed per new game hour?
A 100/??? connection? How much data per hour?
A 1000/???? connection?
How much data per month given a few hours of game play per day? Plus many hours more per weekend?
AC Recycling was never "free".
A city could cover the costs considering the money they find for other virtue signalling projects.
Recycling would do a lot of good considering the money found to be used on other political city projects.
A first person game would be fine as the data needed for movement would be as now.
Ping would be as is.
The data set to set up the game and what is seen in every game would change.
A 1-100 gig load up of graphics per game to look at so every game is different?
Every part of the networked game would be much better visual quality every game.
Its not watching data like TV.
This is moving vast amounts of game data in real time every time a person in a game moves around in real time.
Less use of the GPU and CPU, vast amounts of needed graphics and sound data is pushed down to the user playing the game.
Every movement and change in the game is sent up and new data sets get pushed down to the user.
Every hour in game is like downloading select parts of a 30-90 gig game again and again.
That is the data use per day.
The average CPU and GPU can't create an expected game world.
Use a super computer and send the data sets out as the users move around a larger game world in real time.
Better graphics, better looking worlds. More different graphics data than can fit on one ~30~100 gig game download.
The placement of real time ads in data sets.
The EU is using the data.
Use a good VPN.
Block ads on your computer to keep the EU tracking out.
Reduced the ability of the EU to track your internet usage.
VR support to create VR.
The playing of the VR product will need a real computer with a real CPU and GPU that can keep the needed VR speed and quality.
Why is recycling a cost? The glass gets reused. Metal gets sorted. Plant material is used. Material that can't be sorted goes to a traditional landfill.
What are US cities using their money for? Moving waste around should not be an onerous task for any US city considering their tax rates and other spending.
Pensions?
Services for non citizens?
Education?
Roads?
Police?
Welfare?
is still slow.
Want to move heat out of a computer?
Design a real computer that can keep a CPU/GPU working without having to slow down quickly for heat.
People in the EU have the wealth and ability to start their own EU services.
The "internet" is not some new thing that has to be exported from the USA to the EU.
People in the EU are more happy to use an innovative US service than something someone in the EU attempted to design.
What can EU nations gov do?
Use language and police laws to force people in the EU to only use a EU created product/service?
Demand people in the EU pay to use a product made in the EU?
The US service is "free" for consumers and works well? Why should EU nations have to pay to use another EU nations products that are not as good as the better quality US service?
No freedom and a selection of EU products that don't have the same ability of the US services?
Only approve EU nations network products for use in the EU?
Thats not free and fair trade with the USA.
Most of this was attempted in the 1970's and 1980's. People all over the world used their money to buy better quality US OS and US software.
Better quality games, the internet, productivity software and GUI all won over EU nation consumers to innovative and well funded US brands.
Years later in 2019 US networks and now advanced and innovative US internet services are still winning over EU nations.
The US brands understand computers and networks at the consumer level globally in 2019. The EU understands laws, rules, regulations and new taxes.
Go nuclear for energy. Its only to stop one rocket at a time. The energy needed is great but its for one rocket at a time.
The US expects it has the energy, aim and detection ready.
The US detects a nation is getting ready to attempt a rocket test.
Their rocket fails to get into orbit.
The enemy nation is expected to look over its failed rocket for weeks and months. Then try again.
Another US beam is used. The enemy nation takes months to look over the next crash.
Try again.
Then start looking at its own staff for security issues.
Attempt another launch months later.
This is not some 1980's system to have a repeated use over vast numbers of Soviet rockets within a very short time.
Re "scale"
Computers are faster and smaller.
Its not for a full Soviet amount of detection.
Re "program feasible"
The US just wants this for one rocket attempting a needed test by any 1st/2nd/3rd world nation.
A nation attempts to test its longer range rockets and every time it fails to get very far.
No need to send in special forces to make the launch fail.
Now the US can do it for space and reach down to any nation attempting to do rockets.
Every attempt to start will fail.
Think of the US ability to allow some nations to send up a satellite. Other nations will always fail at every satellite they attempt to send up.
In the end the nation will have to buy into commercial satellite services and the US will get a good look at that nations satellite.
Its not about scale this time. The only progress needed to perfectly stop any advanced nations attempt to get a satellite up.
Every time will fail when the USA says no.
The US mil will hold the keys to who is allowed to be in space.
Need lots of energy to make the new type of bean more able to reach down past that thick atmosphere.
Try to get any rocket ready and the US makes the launch fail from orbit. Go full submarine to avoid that in the open launch in the wide open on land?
Thats why the West let the Soviet Union go full satellite. So no nation can say they have any control over what is in orbit above them at any time.
Decades later the US is going full particle-beam. Who can say no? The precedent for a free for all in space was set long ago.
To keep your internet slow thanks to new federal rules and laws.
No innovation, what of new innovative community broadband?
Back to more federal rules and laws to keep existing network speeds.
Slashdot Mirror
AC The UK is allowed to share access to US military bases in the UK. The US can remove UK access to raw data gathered by the USA at any time for any reason. :)
The role of the US base in the UK stays the same.
The UK then gets no further US raw data gathered by the USA.
Thats US data to gift to other nations like the UK. Paid for by US tax payers. Not US data that the UK has any extra right to.
What the USA once shared from its global spying operations, the USA can stop sharing with the UK.
Nothing more about Ireland in real time.
The UK will then have to use its own spies globally, buy its own UK spy and mil communications/crypto satellite network.
Run its own nuclear submarines with 100% UK tech
Once US support stops the UK mil budget will need to grow very quickly.
Time for the GCHQ and BND to put in a budget for a lot more spy satellites this year.
Got the mil budget for a rush build on lots of new spy satellites this year?
Got the experts to design, place and use US grade spy satellites? Locations globally to get spy data in real time?
When the US raw data stops Germany and the Uk will have to fit in the collect it all gaps.
No more US tax payers giving away billions of $ each year in free mil/spy data to Eu nations.
All the EU nations with shared US bases will revert to US only use.
EU nations top staff will have their security clearances removed.
No more visits to the USA for the EU tops spy experts.
No more data, hardware, upgrades for EU spies from the USA.
When the USA turns off the flow of raw real time data what will EU nations do?
The BND needs the flow of US data everyday.
The GCHQ needs US support globally and US support in Ireland.
Ask their embassy staff to spy more globally and never get detected spying?
Send out EU spies around the world?
Ask France to share/risk its global spy networks in real time? Colonel Marc and Henri will say no to that.
Going full Communist allows the USA to talk away and fully support more loyal nations.
Nations like New Zealand, Japan, Poland.
Should the rest of the EU/NATO want to go full Communist then they will have to find another nation to offer them real time counterintelligence/intelligence as the US does now.
The US looked after NATO and nations in what is the EU for decades.
Their intelligence workers got the best US support, equipment and data. They got invited to the US to see US secrets and got to use US advancements.
The US supported the UK with equipment when the UK needed such support in Ireland. Full collection.
Now the UK forgets such real time US intelligence support in Ireland?
Now the same nations after decades of US tax payers support go full Communist?
Time for the US to find new friends it can trust to keep secrets and who will support the USA.
AC its not about predictive logic/cheating..
This is about the data set size sent to a user in real time. Can the ISP allow so much data to flow every game?
Can the series of tubes that is the "internet" all around the USA allow for so much data to flow down to new games in real time?
Will a much faster, wider series of tubes be needed with unlimited data?
How much data is needed at what download speed per new game hour?
A 100/??? connection? How much data per hour?
A 1000/???? connection?
How much data per month given a few hours of game play per day? Plus many hours more per weekend?
AC Recycling was never "free".
A city could cover the costs considering the money they find for other virtue signalling projects.
Recycling would do a lot of good considering the money found to be used on other political city projects.
Real time in game ads with the "new" graphics sent out every game :)
A first person game would be fine as the data needed for movement would be as now.
Ping would be as is.
The data set to set up the game and what is seen in every game would change.
A 1-100 gig load up of graphics per game to look at so every game is different?
Every part of the networked game would be much better visual quality every game.
Its not watching data like TV.
This is moving vast amounts of game data in real time every time a person in a game moves around in real time.
Less use of the GPU and CPU, vast amounts of needed graphics and sound data is pushed down to the user playing the game.
Every movement and change in the game is sent up and new data sets get pushed down to the user.
Every hour in game is like downloading select parts of a 30-90 gig game again and again.
That is the data use per day.
The average CPU and GPU can't create an expected game world.
Use a super computer and send the data sets out as the users move around a larger game world in real time.
Better graphics, better looking worlds. More different graphics data than can fit on one ~30~100 gig game download.
The placement of real time ads in data sets.
The EU is using the data.
Use a good VPN.
Block ads on your computer to keep the EU tracking out.
Reduced the ability of the EU to track your internet usage.
VR support to create VR.
The playing of the VR product will need a real computer with a real CPU and GPU that can keep the needed VR speed and quality.
Why is recycling a cost? The glass gets reused. Metal gets sorted. Plant material is used. Material that can't be sorted goes to a traditional landfill.
What are US cities using their money for? Moving waste around should not be an onerous task for any US city considering their tax rates and other spending.
Pensions?
Services for non citizens?
Education?
Roads?
Police?
Welfare?
More ads will have to be sent out by an ad company as its now less able to focus ads.
is still slow.
Want to move heat out of a computer?
Design a real computer that can keep a CPU/GPU working without having to slow down quickly for heat.
People in the EU have the wealth and ability to start their own EU services.
The "internet" is not some new thing that has to be exported from the USA to the EU.
People in the EU are more happy to use an innovative US service than something someone in the EU attempted to design.
What can EU nations gov do?
Use language and police laws to force people in the EU to only use a EU created product/service?
Demand people in the EU pay to use a product made in the EU?
The US service is "free" for consumers and works well? Why should EU nations have to pay to use another EU nations products that are not as good as the better quality US service?
No freedom and a selection of EU products that don't have the same ability of the US services?
Only approve EU nations network products for use in the EU?
Thats not free and fair trade with the USA.
Most of this was attempted in the 1970's and 1980's. People all over the world used their money to buy better quality US OS and US software.
Better quality games, the internet, productivity software and GUI all won over EU nation consumers to innovative and well funded US brands.
Years later in 2019 US networks and now advanced and innovative US internet services are still winning over EU nations.
The US brands understand computers and networks at the consumer level globally in 2019. The EU understands laws, rules, regulations and new taxes.
By never allowing workers to have the freedom to create a union.
Go nuclear for energy. Its only to stop one rocket at a time. The energy needed is great but its for one rocket at a time.
The US expects it has the energy, aim and detection ready.
The US detects a nation is getting ready to attempt a rocket test.
Their rocket fails to get into orbit.
The enemy nation is expected to look over its failed rocket for weeks and months. Then try again.
Another US beam is used. The enemy nation takes months to look over the next crash.
Try again.
Then start looking at its own staff for security issues.
Attempt another launch months later.
This is not some 1980's system to have a repeated use over vast numbers of Soviet rockets within a very short time.
Re "scale" Computers are faster and smaller.
Its not for a full Soviet amount of detection.
Re "program feasible"
The US just wants this for one rocket attempting a needed test by any 1st/2nd/3rd world nation.
A nation attempts to test its longer range rockets and every time it fails to get very far.
No need to send in special forces to make the launch fail.
Now the US can do it for space and reach down to any nation attempting to do rockets.
Every attempt to start will fail.
Think of the US ability to allow some nations to send up a satellite. Other nations will always fail at every satellite they attempt to send up.
In the end the nation will have to buy into commercial satellite services and the US will get a good look at that nations satellite.
Its not about scale this time. The only progress needed to perfectly stop any advanced nations attempt to get a satellite up.
Every time will fail when the USA says no.
The US mil will hold the keys to who is allowed to be in space.
Need lots of energy to make the new type of bean more able to reach down past that thick atmosphere.
Try to get any rocket ready and the US makes the launch fail from orbit. Go full submarine to avoid that in the open launch in the wide open on land?
Thats why the West let the Soviet Union go full satellite. So no nation can say they have any control over what is in orbit above them at any time.
Decades later the US is going full particle-beam. Who can say no? The precedent for a free for all in space was set long ago.
is good.
Content removed. Reported. Shadow ban. Deranking. No review of movies?
Russia has laws is bad.
To enjoy new and advanced computer games on Windows 10.
To keep your internet slow thanks to new federal rules and laws.
No innovation, what of new innovative community broadband?
Back to more federal rules and laws to keep existing network speeds.
Always with the tax and penalty side of big government.
How about letting people all over the EU select the services and products they want to use?