Early games expected networks like that found on an advanced networked campus and then had dial up support.
People now have faster networks. 1000/1000 services for users can be found globally.
Powerful gaming GPU support is going to be ready. Thats the raison d'etre of any great GPU brand:)
Windows OS has been game supportive for users and developers for many years now.
Games will be ready as really smart and creative people can do that design work.
Find a great ISP with no caps and faster network speeds.
The more people all over the EU will notice such draconian EU laws.
The EU should embrace freedoms and innovation.
Not add to more EU gov censorship and tax.
Games that design around input lag can be created by skilled computer experts selected on merit.
All a matter of finding creative staff with skill, imagination, math and educational ability.
Games need to be fun and need to support the networks they will have to work on.
Put the network conditions in the new game design and see what really smart and very creative people can do.
The role of data caps will have to be worked around.
Find a ISP that can support not having data caps.
No ISP like that? Support new community broadband that can support no data caps.
The display, CPU, OS, GPU, RAM is ready.
All that is needed is a great ISP and new games design for streaming.
New games should not be a problem considering the number of artists and computer experts.
Let new ISP be innovative and the "series of tubes" will be ready too.
But today we have an advanced Windows OS.
Powerful new GPU and CPU hardware.
Lots of RAM.
5K and 8K displays are ready.
The user side is set for some new games.
The streaming side is ready in the US. Content and the computers to stream from.
The series of paper insulated wireline between the new content and the users computer is the series of tubes that is holding back US game innovation.
The past work on malware discovery helped a lot of people and nations secure their data and networks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Bringing Kaspersky to any OS will just improve such support and detection of new and unexpected malware.
some actual bandwidth for all the new streaming services?
Got some extra new innovative new telco to go with that streaming service?
Something to stream on that's faster than paper insulated wireline?
Computers will have 6K and 8K displays. The CPU and GPU will be ready. The Windows OS has the CPU, GPU, network code support.
Time to make a new series of tubes to actually get the data to users?
Push 5K streaming out over 5G?
An ad company that wont do ads?
Without a good VPN to escape the controls of a Communist nation:
No freedom to look up funny political cartoon bear?
No to services that allow people to find out more about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests?
No reading about term limits?
No to reading books and publications from South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and the USA?
No to reading news from the real China, Taiwan?
No 1984 books.
An ad company selects to go full Communist. An ad brand that is compatible with state censorship provisions.
Any nation that rejects a long term US offer of support will not get further access to US intelligence.
The US is not going to risk methods to work with nations that won't support the USA. Politically, in terms of decades of shared base access.
Once a nation selects not to work with the USA, then the US will not support that nation.
What the US gave from any shared base/site globally, the US can stop giving any nation access to.
The UK was clear on its 1960-1970's Diego Garcia agreement.
The US was also very clear in the 1970's with the UK on what happens when such agreements are altered.
1) Most large US cities can pay a lot for a lot of different political projects every year. Why not something good like recycling AC?
2) Re "no market for it" That is not the problem of the city. Pay to have to sorted and used. Not everything a city will do will make a profit.
3) Then why not do recycling on what is not "mixed plastics"? Metal, glass, composted organic waste? Thats a start for now.
4) A city can find money for all kinds of political ideas? Why not the most simple of ideas, a city paying for site preparation costs and doing some recycling?
Where is the city money going every year? That could pay for some new recycling efforts?
Re "It would be disclosing facts"
Has any nation ever talked openly about its actual spy methods?
All the US has to do tell the EU governments what will be needed for them to keep US secrets safe.
If EU nations can't meet that then the US no longer has to share its intelligence with any EU nation.
The US does not have to talk in the open or "demonstrate" in any way what it understands is a risk to US methods.
Why does the US need to risk its own intelligence to provide evidence to nations that are been given US intelligence?
Thats a US tax payer funded collection of data given to EU nations.
The US can set limits on who and why any nation gets US intelligence support for any reason.
TO grant more access. To totally stop access. The US gets to set the terms as its their risk and their global collection.
Why should the US have to talk about any "evidence" in the open?
Thats a security risk to US methods and ability.
That can happen in a secure gov to gov setting.
No nation would talk about mil/gov "evidence" in then open for any reason.
Evidence relating to mil and security matters is what historians request approval to write about in about 50 years.
Should EU governments still select to go Communist, they can.
The US can then select to share its intelligence with nations that are more secure and much more response to actually keeping US secrets.
When a nation is sharing its own intelligence it can give any advice it wants to nations getting that intelligence.
Got that money to look after NATO and an expanded global BND collection?
The UK will have to find the money for the GCHQ to replace what the US no longer gives.
Maybe France can be asked to risk its own spy networks to help?
A new EU wide tax to pay for spying?
How much more new tax can be extracted to pay for new mil/gov/spying in each EU nation?
NATO still needs to be supported every year too:)
Got the budget growth for some new global spying?
The UK and Germany will have to find some support for their security services after the US alters the mil/gov sharing of raw intelligence.
They can collect their own intelligence globally with no new mil spending?
Find another nation with the ability the USA has to share with?
AC recycling can be a cost, it can make a profit. The question is then why can't a city cover the costs given all the other political projects a city can find a budget for.
Re "Also note that a lot of the data-taps are on EU (or British) soil"
That would be on US base sites. No non US staff would be allowed near such collection once the US removed EU access.
The site of US collection would not change. EU/NATO and UK gov/mil access to the data collected would be stopped.
The positive effect would be to nations that stayed with the USA and that the US can trust.
Re 'hugely preferably to not have that data" that would not be good news for the GCHQ, BND.
They would have to put in a budget request to totally replace all US data sharing.
Got a global mil budget to replace what the US tax payer once offered?
Germany is dependant on US global real time data.
Without that Germany is open to Communist and other nations spying, industrial espionage.
The USA kept West Germany and now Germany safe for decades.
Germany thanks the USA by going Communist.
Re BND https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Note the US origins and support.
Re AC " You still need our intelligence in return"
What from? French, German and UK HumInt?
Most nations that can spy can detect other nations HumInt attempts.
Embassy staff, tourists, think tank workers, NGO workers, charity workers, people trying to proselytize will not offer the perfect cover once expected.
Thats what real time US collected intelligence is always so wanted by the EU nations.
HumInt cant cover everything and most EU nations do not have the mil budgets for their own global real time HumInt.
The US was what covered for the most nations mil budgets and lack of any global HumInt ability.
Ask France to share its collection globally and risk its collection when sharing with all of the EU?
Slashdot Mirror
Germany for now.
Early games expected networks like that found on an advanced networked campus and then had dial up support. :)
People now have faster networks. 1000/1000 services for users can be found globally.
Powerful gaming GPU support is going to be ready. Thats the raison d'etre of any great GPU brand
Windows OS has been game supportive for users and developers for many years now.
Games will be ready as really smart and creative people can do that design work.
Find a great ISP with no caps and faster network speeds.
The more people all over the EU will notice such draconian EU laws.
The EU should embrace freedoms and innovation.
Not add to more EU gov censorship and tax.
Coal is in use and still selected for new energy production all over China AC.
Games that design around input lag can be created by skilled computer experts selected on merit.
All a matter of finding creative staff with skill, imagination, math and educational ability.
Games need to be fun and need to support the networks they will have to work on.
Put the network conditions in the new game design and see what really smart and very creative people can do.
The role of data caps will have to be worked around.
Find a ISP that can support not having data caps.
No ISP like that? Support new community broadband that can support no data caps.
The display, CPU, OS, GPU, RAM is ready.
All that is needed is a great ISP and new games design for streaming.
New games should not be a problem considering the number of artists and computer experts.
Let new ISP be innovative and the "series of tubes" will be ready too.
But today we have an advanced Windows OS.
Powerful new GPU and CPU hardware.
Lots of RAM.
5K and 8K displays are ready.
The user side is set for some new games.
The streaming side is ready in the US. Content and the computers to stream from.
The series of paper insulated wireline between the new content and the users computer is the series of tubes that is holding back US game innovation.
The past work on malware discovery helped a lot of people and nations secure their data and networks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Bringing Kaspersky to any OS will just improve such support and detection of new and unexpected malware.
Coal power. Then work out the range needed. Then more coal power.
China selects the lowest cost of energy. That can be a lot more new coal. Its not all solar.
some actual bandwidth for all the new streaming services?
Got some extra new innovative new telco to go with that streaming service?
Something to stream on that's faster than paper insulated wireline?
Computers will have 6K and 8K displays. The CPU and GPU will be ready.
The Windows OS has the CPU, GPU, network code support.
Time to make a new series of tubes to actually get the data to users?
Push 5K streaming out over 5G?
An ad company that wont do ads?
Without a good VPN to escape the controls of a Communist nation:
No freedom to look up funny political cartoon bear?
No to services that allow people to find out more about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests?
No reading about term limits?
No to reading books and publications from South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and the USA?
No to reading news from the real China, Taiwan?
No 1984 books.
An ad company selects to go full Communist. An ad brand that is compatible with state censorship provisions.
Invest in the EU and face new EU taxes and new regulations.
Invest in the USA and enjoy the freedom to grow your brand globally.
Any nation that rejects a long term US offer of support will not get further access to US intelligence.
The US is not going to risk methods to work with nations that won't support the USA. Politically, in terms of decades of shared base access.
Once a nation selects not to work with the USA, then the US will not support that nation.
What the US gave from any shared base/site globally, the US can stop giving any nation access to.
The UK was clear on its 1960-1970's Diego Garcia agreement.
The US was also very clear in the 1970's with the UK on what happens when such agreements are altered.
Did the UK ever give up on spying in Ireland?
Ireland is still getting collected on by the UK and USA to ensure the "peace process" works.
1) Most large US cities can pay a lot for a lot of different political projects every year. Why not something good like recycling AC?
2) Re "no market for it" That is not the problem of the city. Pay to have to sorted and used. Not everything a city will do will make a profit.
3) Then why not do recycling on what is not "mixed plastics"? Metal, glass, composted organic waste? Thats a start for now.
4) A city can find money for all kinds of political ideas? Why not the most simple of ideas, a city paying for site preparation costs and doing some recycling?
Where is the city money going every year? That could pay for some new recycling efforts?
No budget to replace US collection?
No budget to fully support NATO?
Re "It would be disclosing facts"
Has any nation ever talked openly about its actual spy methods?
All the US has to do tell the EU governments what will be needed for them to keep US secrets safe.
If EU nations can't meet that then the US no longer has to share its intelligence with any EU nation.
The US does not have to talk in the open or "demonstrate" in any way what it understands is a risk to US methods.
Why does the US need to risk its own intelligence to provide evidence to nations that are been given US intelligence?
Thats a US tax payer funded collection of data given to EU nations.
The US can set limits on who and why any nation gets US intelligence support for any reason.
TO grant more access. To totally stop access. The US gets to set the terms as its their risk and their global collection.
Why should the US have to talk about any "evidence" in the open?
Thats a security risk to US methods and ability.
That can happen in a secure gov to gov setting.
No nation would talk about mil/gov "evidence" in then open for any reason.
Evidence relating to mil and security matters is what historians request approval to write about in about 50 years.
Should EU governments still select to go Communist, they can.
The US can then select to share its intelligence with nations that are more secure and much more response to actually keeping US secrets.
When a nation is sharing its own intelligence it can give any advice it wants to nations getting that intelligence.
Got that money to look after NATO and an expanded global BND collection? :)
The UK will have to find the money for the GCHQ to replace what the US no longer gives.
Maybe France can be asked to risk its own spy networks to help?
A new EU wide tax to pay for spying?
How much more new tax can be extracted to pay for new mil/gov/spying in each EU nation?
NATO still needs to be supported every year too
Got the budget growth for some new global spying?
The UK and Germany will have to find some support for their security services after the US alters the mil/gov sharing of raw intelligence.
They can collect their own intelligence globally with no new mil spending?
Find another nation with the ability the USA has to share with?
AC recycling can be a cost, it can make a profit. The question is then why can't a city cover the costs given all the other political projects a city can find a budget for.
Supporting a Communist nation after the advice USA is Germany going Communist.
Re "Also note that a lot of the data-taps are on EU (or British) soil"
That would be on US base sites. No non US staff would be allowed near such collection once the US removed EU access.
The site of US collection would not change. EU/NATO and UK gov/mil access to the data collected would be stopped.
The positive effect would be to nations that stayed with the USA and that the US can trust.
Re 'hugely preferably to not have that data" that would not be good news for the GCHQ, BND.
They would have to put in a budget request to totally replace all US data sharing.
Got a global mil budget to replace what the US tax payer once offered?
Germany is dependant on US global real time data.
Without that Germany is open to Communist and other nations spying, industrial espionage.
The USA kept West Germany and now Germany safe for decades.
Germany thanks the USA by going Communist.
Re BND https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Note the US origins and support.
Re AC " You still need our intelligence in return"
What from? French, German and UK HumInt?
Most nations that can spy can detect other nations HumInt attempts.
Embassy staff, tourists, think tank workers, NGO workers, charity workers, people trying to proselytize will not offer the perfect cover once expected.
Thats what real time US collected intelligence is always so wanted by the EU nations.
HumInt cant cover everything and most EU nations do not have the mil budgets for their own global real time HumInt.
The US was what covered for the most nations mil budgets and lack of any global HumInt ability.
Ask France to share its collection globally and risk its collection when sharing with all of the EU?