Tax money allows the school, parents and students to select what they want to do.
English, art, history, math, chemistry, sport are also parts of education that might need some support all over the USA.
Lift all sectors of education and many people can get into university. Study what they want and get accepted on merit.
The USA ends up with more lawyers, scientists, engineers, artists, musicians, doctors, inventors, coal miners and carpenters.
Some might even become great investigative journalists and get good jobs reporting on computer science funding.
With the freedom to read, publish, invent, talk and comment online.
That freedom to select an quality education is what makes the USA great again.
Why the need to be seen funding "computer science"?
If its all about giving to "education", let the people in education select what is most needed and actually wanted.
A nation only needs so many great people in computer science every generation.
Thy can be found with normal IQ testing, on merit and with exams. Get given full scholarships and be productive for decades.
How about giving half just computer support. Give half to a lot more general education.
Give some funds for all other areas of education and see what the results are.
Do the average and low IQ students respond well to more ebooks? GUI robots? Computers?
A new lab? New buildings? More teachers? Really skilled teachers?
Look back a decade later and see what all that funding does to average students. A generation of super computer designers?
Another generation of average ebook readers and computer game buyers?
Can more IQ be taught and computer science create a smarter generation? Who can actually pass all their tests on merit?
Did more support for all education get better exam results years later?
Did more art, music, science, math, english for years change the results? Did much more support for only computer science get better exam results in all areas of education?
Will learning a CoC while learning to code make for better exam results and get more average students into college and the best university programs?
Why would the USA give free access to more of its tech under the cover of "science" and some need to "collaborate" with a Communist government?
Thats all tech the USA had to pay for and test.
Dont just give it all away to nations that supported North Korea, Vietnam as policy against the USA.
Code now has a few slight changes.
Learn how to read a Code of Conduct (CoC) and what a CoC allows code to be used for in 2019 and beyond.
Select a computer code that is still in use. Has the code got a CoC that allows the results to still make a profit?
Do you have to show your code for anyone to copy and give away for free?
Dont learn a code that makes you give everything you worked on away for free.
Will the CoC make the code difficult to use and make a profit from? Look at a better code with a less restrictive CoC.
Code that fully respects the right to make a profit and to keep the results of the many hours of hard work put into a project.
Find a code product that has allows the results of hard work to be sold for a profit no matter the type of project and who you work for.
A code with lots of complex English terms and words in it. That keeps average foreign workers away from that type of code.
No good learning a code that is cheaper to code with outside the USA. Use your advanced US English education when learning to code.
A CoC that does not track all code use and make later demands on how that code is been used.
After finding code that is in use in 2019 and that allows a profit to be made, look for an approved way for learning how to code.
Getting an approved education in code allows that professional skill to be used.
Take out a loan. Use savings from a bank account. Get accepted into an approved educational company that can teach code.
Find an approved computer teaching company and invest fully in the hours, days, weeks, months, years and "Learn to Code".
Remember to watch for any changes on the CoC that will reduce the ability to make a profit form the code.
Be ready for any attempts by a CoC to track code use and make demands on how code is used.
CoC can change at any time for any reason. So select a good quality code before learning how to code.
Find an online code community that works to support users. Do they actually help users code or just use code to push their political views?
Attend code class on time and have all your work ready.
Do the code homework that's set and be ready for all code exams and tests.
Take more time to really study the needed complex math. Math is needed and should be studied outside any set code work that is set.
Long hours learning code. Learning new math. Learning how to use the advanced math with the code.
After years of hard work apply for all the new code jobs all over the USA.
Be ready to move to any part of the USA given a company may seek low tax rates in different fully gentrified cities and states.
a big external GPU.
A new computer design with a real GPU inside and less thermal considerations.
An OS that supports and keeps up with the needs of GPU, CPU and sound code.
The ability for the OS to support a CPU and GPU to get full 4K and 5K frame rates.
Not allow OS version drift to alter such CPU and GPU support again and again.
An OS thats game aware and has the OS support to keep games working long term.
If the US starts fixing the IoT and getting good results with its improved IoT security then people in the US gov will want to fix their own wide open gov network too.
That will make extra work for the FBI and NSA doing their testing and investigations of spies in the USA.
Default passwords that work without a trace and much effort allow for easy detection of spies by a few trusted teams of US investigators.
Secure the IoT and all other consumer networks the CIA, NSA, FBI cant get easy access to a worker/contractors network at home, after work.
The results of improved IoT security in the US will open the door to calls for all other US networks to get more security all over the USA.
Nobody wants strong passwords on any network to stop an open investigation.
Not staring on IoT, home networks, at work.
What happens when all US networks dont have default passwords?
The US gov/mil will be back having to find a work around for every real password for every network it encounters.
Attempts by gov like that risk detection every time.
Re " infeasible today because the effort is just too large."
Bot nets made by non gov groups do it everyday all over different nations networks using a default list of passwords to quickly scan all networks they find.
Re "mess is manufacturer and vendor liability"
Too late. Too much is already sold, in use and can be connected to using default password lists.
Detection and a request to change at least gets the gov a list of networks that got changed.
A list of networks that did not do what the gov told them when asked.
CCTV in/near the gov/mil/city hall gives every face and every plate, every passengers face.
Some voice prints too? Hows that new, low cost, fully imported IMSI-catcher working?
Thats every US worker, officer, walk in informant, undercover gov/mil.
Japan would be not as productive for bot-nets that expect a simple default list of expected passwords to get started.
The "bot-nets" would have to be more complex to then try all random stronger passwords and risk getting detected per attempt in Japan.
Move to another nation that has no such policy and many more of its networks are on default passwords.
The NSA has all the keys to junk crypto products sold and that are approved for export.
PRISM shows when and how the US gov gets its collect it all access.
Default password lists exist.
Japan as a gov can detect such networked systems and ask any company to make a change.
Getting a letter from the gov of Japan and showing the change was made will accomplish something.
The company has two options once it gets told its networks need to be changed.
By doing the needed work and telling the gov it did the needed work.
By ignoring the gov letter and keeping its network as it was. Then telling the gov officially it did the needed "work"... Work it never did.
The company can never later say they did not know.
That the use default passwords was policy and the company did not know.
Code litter and later skilled code review will find out and a company that changed its passwords from default will be ok.
A company that was found to have not changed its passwords when asked and told the gov it was in full compliance will face further questions.
The NSA could not then track all the US mil/gov workers and see who is searching for what in real time if real strong network security existed.
The FBI could not then enter a network and collect on a "spy" that was searching and moving data around if their deep network use was detected.
The USA is kept in a state of plain text, junk crypto, keys shared with the US gov for very good security reasons.
The NSA, US mil and FBI have to be able to track their workers and contractors work network and home "internet" use 24/7.
Who is searching for journalists to contact.
Who printed what document and gave it to a journalist.
Default passwords all over the US gov/mil make tracking US workers "spying" efforts an achievable task by a small group of trusted US mil/gov security teams.
The commonsense approach is to keep US networks open and crypto junk in place so all the generations of spies don't get to hide their "search" terms.
It will detect all the devices left on default.
A gov can do that via its networks that face all networks in Japan.
Most deices will then change from the easy lists of default passwords.
People from China and North Korea expecting their lists of default passwords to grant access to many networks all over Japan will have to revert to other more complex methods to enter networks in Japan.
Such changes from a list of default network passwords might just get detected/blocked.
The easy days of using a list of default passwords is then over on average.
Then the company will be told by the gov that their "things like UPnP" is wide open.
The company can then change its policy and secure its network.
Change its passwords.
Upgrade.
That warning by the gov will have to be acted upon.
The gov will give time and advice to work on "things like UPnP" settings?
Should that "things like UPnP" be found to be part of any computer network intrusion?
The gov can then come back an ask why the "things like UPnP" was still left open to the world?
The company can then list their reasons why the "things like UPnP" policy was left in place.
Should it be a good reason then the gov will accept that.
The company was given the gov results about the "things like UPnP", advice and time to consider its network.
Was the reason not good then further questions get asked about all gov policy/tax/banking the company might be missing.
Not acting on "things like UPnP" when requested by the gov could risk lot more investigation and questions later.
Every network facing password in Japan could be inspected by the gov.
Any that respond to a default password get a request to upgrade, change the password.
The gov tests again. Who took the advice. Who did not.
When China and North Korea enter a computer network in Japan the review will then ask about the password policy.
Was anything left open as a default after the gov issued its results and asked for a password change?
Can the company show it followed best practice and had changed its passwords as it was asked to do?
A company that changed its passwords all be ok.
A company that failed to take the "advice" when requested by the gov?
That will open up further questions.
List of default passwords exist.
Gov sends out a reminder that a site has network connected equipment that has default passwords.
Gov tests many sites and sends out many reminders to change the passwords.
Password policy is slowly changed all over Japan as the gov is now testing networks.
The cooperation with the government makes Japan stronger and more effective.
Attempt by China and North Korea to enter Japan by a network will now need more CPU power per attempt.
Should an attempt to get into a network be proved to have been using a default password after getting a gov reminder to change the password?
That could change the way the gov views the computer crime. From getting hacked and having a strong password policy.
To having not taken the past gov advice and then left a network wide open.
The real trick was what China went shopping for in the USA.
A lot of the US factories got inspected by experts from China.
All that generational US tech got packed up and shipped to China.
The cost of the worker in the USA was too much.
The same US machine in China with low power costs and low worker wages could still make China a profit.
China selling US parts made on US production lines back to the USA.
In the past German hydro, gas, cola, nuclear would have kept it all working.
Now the sun has to be out and the wind blowing.
Its not fun having to stop and start a production line that could be working 24/7.
The costs of power will not make exports any cheaper.
Slashdot Mirror
Tax money allows the school, parents and students to select what they want to do.
English, art, history, math, chemistry, sport are also parts of education that might need some support all over the USA.
Lift all sectors of education and many people can get into university. Study what they want and get accepted on merit.
The USA ends up with more lawyers, scientists, engineers, artists, musicians, doctors, inventors, coal miners and carpenters.
Some might even become great investigative journalists and get good jobs reporting on computer science funding.
With the freedom to read, publish, invent, talk and comment online.
That freedom to select an quality education is what makes the USA great again.
Why the need to be seen funding "computer science"?
If its all about giving to "education", let the people in education select what is most needed and actually wanted.
A nation only needs so many great people in computer science every generation.
Thy can be found with normal IQ testing, on merit and with exams. Get given full scholarships and be productive for decades.
How about giving half just computer support. Give half to a lot more general education.
Give some funds for all other areas of education and see what the results are.
Do the average and low IQ students respond well to more ebooks? GUI robots? Computers?
A new lab? New buildings? More teachers? Really skilled teachers?
Look back a decade later and see what all that funding does to average students. A generation of super computer designers?
Another generation of average ebook readers and computer game buyers?
Can more IQ be taught and computer science create a smarter generation? Who can actually pass all their tests on merit?
Did more support for all education get better exam results years later?
Did more art, music, science, math, english for years change the results? Did much more support for only computer science get better exam results in all areas of education?
Will learning a CoC while learning to code make for better exam results and get more average students into college and the best university programs?
Why would the USA give free access to more of its tech under the cover of "science" and some need to "collaborate" with a Communist government?
Thats all tech the USA had to pay for and test.
Dont just give it all away to nations that supported North Korea, Vietnam as policy against the USA.
Remember what the coal miners got told?
Code now has a few slight changes. Learn how to read a Code of Conduct (CoC) and what a CoC allows code to be used for in 2019 and beyond.
Select a computer code that is still in use. Has the code got a CoC that allows the results to still make a profit?
Do you have to show your code for anyone to copy and give away for free?
Dont learn a code that makes you give everything you worked on away for free.
Will the CoC make the code difficult to use and make a profit from? Look at a better code with a less restrictive CoC.
Code that fully respects the right to make a profit and to keep the results of the many hours of hard work put into a project.
Find a code product that has allows the results of hard work to be sold for a profit no matter the type of project and who you work for.
A code with lots of complex English terms and words in it. That keeps average foreign workers away from that type of code.
No good learning a code that is cheaper to code with outside the USA. Use your advanced US English education when learning to code.
A CoC that does not track all code use and make later demands on how that code is been used.
After finding code that is in use in 2019 and that allows a profit to be made, look for an approved way for learning how to code.
Getting an approved education in code allows that professional skill to be used.
Take out a loan. Use savings from a bank account. Get accepted into an approved educational company that can teach code.
Find an approved computer teaching company and invest fully in the hours, days, weeks, months, years and "Learn to Code".
Remember to watch for any changes on the CoC that will reduce the ability to make a profit form the code.
Be ready for any attempts by a CoC to track code use and make demands on how code is used.
CoC can change at any time for any reason. So select a good quality code before learning how to code.
Find an online code community that works to support users. Do they actually help users code or just use code to push their political views?
Attend code class on time and have all your work ready.
Do the code homework that's set and be ready for all code exams and tests.
Take more time to really study the needed complex math. Math is needed and should be studied outside any set code work that is set.
Long hours learning code. Learning new math. Learning how to use the advanced math with the code.
After years of hard work apply for all the new code jobs all over the USA.
Be ready to move to any part of the USA given a company may seek low tax rates in different fully gentrified cities and states.
MS only wants to bring more ads.
Blocking ads and giving users back control over their browser makes MS unhappy.
lets users control ads and scripts as the browser belongs to the user.
Other OS push their ads onto a users computer.
A bit of NSA, some PRISM.
Some voice prints?
Its a feature for some.
a big external GPU.
A new computer design with a real GPU inside and less thermal considerations.
An OS that supports and keeps up with the needs of GPU, CPU and sound code.
The ability for the OS to support a CPU and GPU to get full 4K and 5K frame rates.
Not allow OS version drift to alter such CPU and GPU support again and again.
An OS thats game aware and has the OS support to keep games working long term.
If the US starts fixing the IoT and getting good results with its improved IoT security then people in the US gov will want to fix their own wide open gov network too.
That will make extra work for the FBI and NSA doing their testing and investigations of spies in the USA.
Default passwords that work without a trace and much effort allow for easy detection of spies by a few trusted teams of US investigators.
Secure the IoT and all other consumer networks the CIA, NSA, FBI cant get easy access to a worker/contractors network at home, after work.
The results of improved IoT security in the US will open the door to calls for all other US networks to get more security all over the USA.
Nobody wants strong passwords on any network to stop an open investigation.
Not staring on IoT, home networks, at work.
What happens when all US networks dont have default passwords?
The US gov/mil will be back having to find a work around for every real password for every network it encounters.
Attempts by gov like that risk detection every time.
Re " infeasible today because the effort is just too large."
Bot nets made by non gov groups do it everyday all over different nations networks using a default list of passwords to quickly scan all networks they find.
Re "mess is manufacturer and vendor liability"
Too late. Too much is already sold, in use and can be connected to using default password lists.
Detection and a request to change at least gets the gov a list of networks that got changed.
A list of networks that did not do what the gov told them when asked.
Its good until the heat has to be removed in some new way.
Heat is the problem.... What to do with all the heat.
CCTV in/near the gov/mil/city hall gives every face and every plate, every passengers face.
Some voice prints too? Hows that new, low cost, fully imported IMSI-catcher working?
Thats every US worker, officer, walk in informant, undercover gov/mil.
The Tandy 1000 was a start https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... with some color and sound AC :)
It will keep out the attempts that always expected default passwords on internet facing systems.
What the NSA, CGHQ will do to Japan will not change.
Japan would be not as productive for bot-nets that expect a simple default list of expected passwords to get started.
The "bot-nets" would have to be more complex to then try all random stronger passwords and risk getting detected per attempt in Japan.
Move to another nation that has no such policy and many more of its networks are on default passwords.
The NSA has all the keys to junk crypto products sold and that are approved for export.
PRISM shows when and how the US gov gets its collect it all access.
Default password lists exist.
Japan as a gov can detect such networked systems and ask any company to make a change.
Getting a letter from the gov of Japan and showing the change was made will accomplish something.
The company has two options once it gets told its networks need to be changed.
By doing the needed work and telling the gov it did the needed work.
By ignoring the gov letter and keeping its network as it was. Then telling the gov officially it did the needed "work"... Work it never did.
The company can never later say they did not know.
That the use default passwords was policy and the company did not know.
Code litter and later skilled code review will find out and a company that changed its passwords from default will be ok.
A company that was found to have not changed its passwords when asked and told the gov it was in full compliance will face further questions.
The NSA could not then track all the US mil/gov workers and see who is searching for what in real time if real strong network security existed.
The FBI could not then enter a network and collect on a "spy" that was searching and moving data around if their deep network use was detected.
The USA is kept in a state of plain text, junk crypto, keys shared with the US gov for very good security reasons.
The NSA, US mil and FBI have to be able to track their workers and contractors work network and home "internet" use 24/7.
Who is searching for journalists to contact.
Who printed what document and gave it to a journalist.
Default passwords all over the US gov/mil make tracking US workers "spying" efforts an achievable task by a small group of trusted US mil/gov security teams.
The commonsense approach is to keep US networks open and crypto junk in place so all the generations of spies don't get to hide their "search" terms.
It will detect all the devices left on default.
A gov can do that via its networks that face all networks in Japan.
Most deices will then change from the easy lists of default passwords. People from China and North Korea expecting their lists of default passwords to grant access to many networks all over Japan will have to revert to other more complex methods to enter networks in Japan.
Such changes from a list of default network passwords might just get detected/blocked.
The easy days of using a list of default passwords is then over on average.
Then the company will be told by the gov that their "things like UPnP" is wide open.
The company can then change its policy and secure its network.
Change its passwords.
Upgrade.
That warning by the gov will have to be acted upon.
The gov will give time and advice to work on "things like UPnP" settings?
Should that "things like UPnP" be found to be part of any computer network intrusion?
The gov can then come back an ask why the "things like UPnP" was still left open to the world?
The company can then list their reasons why the "things like UPnP" policy was left in place.
Should it be a good reason then the gov will accept that.
The company was given the gov results about the "things like UPnP", advice and time to consider its network.
Was the reason not good then further questions get asked about all gov policy/tax/banking the company might be missing.
Not acting on "things like UPnP" when requested by the gov could risk lot more investigation and questions later.
Every network facing password in Japan could be inspected by the gov.
Any that respond to a default password get a request to upgrade, change the password.
The gov tests again. Who took the advice. Who did not.
When China and North Korea enter a computer network in Japan the review will then ask about the password policy.
Was anything left open as a default after the gov issued its results and asked for a password change?
Can the company show it followed best practice and had changed its passwords as it was asked to do?
A company that changed its passwords all be ok.
A company that failed to take the "advice" when requested by the gov?
That will open up further questions.
List of default passwords exist.
Gov sends out a reminder that a site has network connected equipment that has default passwords.
Gov tests many sites and sends out many reminders to change the passwords.
Password policy is slowly changed all over Japan as the gov is now testing networks.
The cooperation with the government makes Japan stronger and more effective.
Attempt by China and North Korea to enter Japan by a network will now need more CPU power per attempt.
Should an attempt to get into a network be proved to have been using a default password after getting a gov reminder to change the password?
That could change the way the gov views the computer crime. From getting hacked and having a strong password policy.
To having not taken the past gov advice and then left a network wide open.
The real trick was what China went shopping for in the USA.
A lot of the US factories got inspected by experts from China.
All that generational US tech got packed up and shipped to China.
The cost of the worker in the USA was too much.
The same US machine in China with low power costs and low worker wages could still make China a profit.
China selling US parts made on US production lines back to the USA.
In the past German hydro, gas, cola, nuclear would have kept it all working.
Now the sun has to be out and the wind blowing.
Its not fun having to stop and start a production line that could be working 24/7.
The costs of power will not make exports any cheaper.