Slashdot Mirror


A Tiny Screw Shows Why iPhones Won't Be 'Assembled in USA' (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Despite a trade war between the United States and China and past admonishments from President Trump "to start building their damn computers and things in this country," Apple is unlikely to bring its manufacturing closer to home. A tiny screw illustrates why. [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source.]

In 2012, Apple's chief executive, Timothy D. Cook, went on prime-time television to announce that Apple would make a Mac computer in the United States. It would be the first Apple product in years to be manufactured by American workers, and the top-of-the-line Mac Pro would come with an unusual inscription: "Assembled in USA." But when Apple began making the $3,000 computer in Austin, Tex., it struggled to find enough screws, according to three people who worked on the project and spoke on the condition of anonymity because of confidentiality agreements.

In China, Apple relied on factories that can produce vast quantities of custom screws on short notice. In Texas, where they say everything is bigger, it turned out the screw suppliers were not. Tests of new versions of the computer were hamstrung because a 20-employee machine shop that Apple's manufacturing contractor was relying on could produce at most 1,000 screws a day. The screw shortage was one of several problems that postponed sales of the computer for months, the people who worked on the project said. By the time the computer was ready for mass production, Apple had ordered screws from China.

499 comments

  1. $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who spends $3,000 on a laptop anymore?

    1. Re:$3,000 laptop by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Mac Pro was not a laptop.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:$3,000 laptop by ebcdic · · Score: 1, Redundant

      The Mac Pro is not a laptop.

    3. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Mac Pro will not be a laptop.

    4. Re:$3,000 laptop by Freischutz · · Score: 2

      Seriously, who spends $3,000 on a laptop anymore?

      Seriously, who spends $300,000 on a car anymore?
      Answer: Those who can afford it and to whom it makes sense to do so.

      ... and the Mac Pro is a desktop computer.

    5. Re:$3,000 laptop by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Mac Pro is not a laptop.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    6. Re:$3,000 laptop by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While a half dozen people have already pointed out the Mac Pro is not a laptop, no one mentioned there are still reasons to buy a $3k laptop. Laptops which act more like mobile workstations than a laptop often have very powerful processors, large high resolution screens, lots of RAM, large SSD hard drives, powerful video cards, and large batteries. I use a similar machine at work (closer to $2k because I don't need a good video card), and while my company could save $500 or more by getting me a desktop having a mobile work computer provides a lot of freedom. I can bring my computer to meetings, work from home (compliance requires I use a work machine at home), and work while on work trips.

      When you have employees costing the company $100k-$200k per year, a 1% productivity enhancement from a better machine can pay for a $1k more expensive laptop in under a year.

      Just because most people can do their jobs on 13" ultra slim laptops, doesn't mean everyone can.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    7. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professionals who make more money with better equipment tend to have better machines. I understand from your comment that your PC waits for you, instead of the other way around, but that's not the case with everyone. Eventually you may get to that point, or your salary may increase to the point that tinkering with a Windows machine costs you more in your time and aggravation than the cheaper machine is "saving" you. YMMV and it's not for everyone, you may not need the extra and that's OK. This is true everywhere in life.

    8. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. I recently used the "saves me 5 minutes a day, at my salary that's over $1000 per year" argument when new management said a new MBP was too expensive even after providing 2 MBPs over the last 12 years... it's pretty simple:
      261 work days in 2018
      5 minutes per day for those days is 21.75 hours
      At $75K / year that's $3921 over 5 years
      At $100K / year that's $5228 for 5 years
      Plus you don't need the $1500 standard company-issued laptop(s) (most here don't last 5 years), so that's another savings on top.

      The better machine saves in opportunity cost as well as productivity.

    9. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Your company is doing it wrong then. It doesn't make sense to purchase a depreciating asset. That's why many organizations and especially larger ones lease their laptops placing the cost of the lease in OpEx instead of CapEx. You have to replace equipment every so often, a lease will provide you with new laptops every 3 to 5 years depending on your terms. This ensures you always have up to date hardware and software and keeps costs predictable.

      A MBP is always overpriced crap unless you are only talking 2 or 3 in your organization. If you have quantity at all VDI quickly wins and is vastly more secure and again, more predictable. Same goes for coders that think they need mobile laptops when in reality they can either share an RDS session host or have their own VMs meaning they have the same processing power from their tablet as well as their laptop. It also means a dropped laptop never results in data loss.

    10. Re:$3,000 laptop by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The Mac Pro will not be a laptop.

      Virtual mod +1 for making me laugh!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:$3,000 laptop by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same goes for coders that think they need mobile laptops when in reality they can either share an RDS session host or have their own VMs

      Completely missing the OP's point. Back when my last company hired developers, we paid them between $500-1000 each and every day that they worked. If spending an extra $1000 on a laptop, or a really good monitor, got us an extra 10 minutes of work a day, it more than paid for itself. Hiring a replacement employee costs tens of thousands of dollars in lost productivity alone - if an extra $1000 on a laptop keeps them around for a few more months because you've created a nicer work environment it pays for itself again.

      Being penny-wise and pound-foolish on the main interface between a developer and the company is common, but that doesn't make it sensible.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    12. Re:$3,000 laptop by Strider- · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Add to this that cheap laptops are often unmaintainable pieces of shit...

      I work with a non-profit, and while we don't buy $3k laptops, we will only buy "Business Grade" laptops for our operations. They last longer, are easier to maintain, and are consistent making the job of our IT department that much easier. Basically for each generation of laptop I have in circulation, I have one software build for them (including drivers etc...). Instead of costing $500 per unit, they cost us $1500 or so, but over the 4 or 5 year lifespan of the laptop, it's worth it.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    13. Re:$3,000 laptop by sremick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there are still reasons to buy a $3k laptop

      Not really.

      I recently had one of our users ask for a Macbook that, with the specs they were requesting, was over $3000.

      I then quoted her a Dell Precision Mobile that had better specs, including a more-powerful video card. It also had room for additional hard-drives (or replacement of the existing standard M.2 NVMe drive), removable/expandable RAM, a higher-resolution 4K display ("Retina" isn't 4K) and all the ports she'd need so no dongle-hell. Oh, and she could get an OEM docking station for $140.

      She could spend more, get an even MORE powerful CPU, more RAM, more SSD, whatever, and STILL be well below the ridiculous $3K luxury cost of the over-priced and under-powered MacBook.

      The demanding apps she uses are available on Windows, and would run better on the more-powerful hardware. The only reason for over-spending +$2K for the MacBook would be a stubborn refusal to learn the radically different process how to move the mouse and click on the Adobe Premiere icon in Windows vs. on a Mac.

      I'm hardly a Windows fanboy (I use Linux), but pragmatically the Dells are far superior options. Mac computers are over-priced status-symbol luxury items that have no place in a business or enterprise. They don't play well with corporate networks, they are virtually unserviceable, totally non-upgradeable now, have built-in 2-3 year obsolescence due to the glued-in batteries, and on the whole are a stupid waste of money. It never ceases to amaze me how many mindless Apple zealots will stubbornly defend the abhorrent company who continuously screws them over more and more with each generation, and can't make a quality product without serious manufacturing flaws to save their life (there's the anti-reflective coating issue on the displays, the recent SSD recall on 13" Macbook Pros, the only computer ever to have a systemic HDD cable failure, the GPU failures in pretty much every generation of their products going back years, SMD chips not being properly soldered to the motherboard requiring a rubber shim so the case presses them against the motherboard harder, the failing keyboard that we're getting flooded with, and so on).

    14. Re:$3,000 laptop by ranton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My laptop is a Lenovo running Windows, and it is over $2k. Macbooks are pretty expensive, but they also use top quality parts throughout. The same goes for other flagship machines such as Surface Pro/Book laptops and the Thinkpad P52 (what I have). I am having trouble finding configurations for a 17" 4k Dell with H series processors and all the other bells and whistles, but I bet it would be over $2k as well.

      The Mac tax on laptops is not that high. Comparable Windows laptops are almost as much, as long as you are really looking at comparable machines. I still built my own desktop though since you can easily save $1-2k on a top of the line build. I can't build my own laptop though.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    15. Re:$3,000 laptop by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      The only reason for over-spending +$2K for the MacBook would be a stubborn refusal to learn the radically different process how to move the mouse and click on the Adobe Premiere icon in Windows vs. on a Mac.

      Well, then there's OS that could be considered too?

      OSX vs Win10?

      And, this was awhile back, I think I saw some tests using Adobe Premier on OSX (iMac Pro) vs Win10 (windows PS equivalent hardware), and I believe they had much faster throughput on the Mac, seems there was some threading limiting factor on the Win machine that wasn't there for the Mac.

      This was awhile back, granted....but something that might have to be considered?

      I too work mostly with Linux, but for my art needs (photography, PS, Premier, LRand now their substitutes of Affinity Photo, FCPX or Davinci Resolve, and On1 RAW.....I do prefer to do those on my mac, and my OLD MacBook pro still stacks up pretty well, although I am now waiting to see what the new Mac Pro looks like and either get that or a loaded up iMac Pro.

      But one does need to research how best the apps work on the hardware/OS combo...as that saved time there matters too if you are a fairly high paid worker.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the discussion mentions which department pays for the cost, you know the cost is no longer the important factor.

    17. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mac Pro will not be a laptop.

      Haha, thank you for that!

    18. Re:$3,000 laptop by edwdig · · Score: 1

      If you're comparing a Thinkpad and a MacBook, yeah, you'll probably get similar list prices. The big difference is a big Apple sale is a couple hundred dollars off, whereas Lenovo does 20% off sales pretty often, and does 30-35% sales every few months. If you buy on sales, the top of the line Thinkpad is going to be $1000 cheaper than the Macbook.

    19. Re:$3,000 laptop by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      And the Precision configuration that you list can easily cost 3k and more

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    20. Re:$3,000 laptop by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      Much of your criticism is spot on, but how does a Mac not "play well" with corporate networks? They talk the same IP everything else does, they support 802.1x authentication, etc. There's even built-in support for Active Directory authentication and Kerberos, though it could use some work (or just complete replacement with the free Centrify agent).

      Seriously, the rest of what you said is hard to argue with, but this particular point isn't true in my experience, and I've been working with Macs on enterprise networks for over 15 years.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    21. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My laptop is a Lenovo running Windows, and it is over $2k. Macbooks are pretty expensive, but they also use top quality parts throughout ....

      Macbooks are top quality you say? See here

    22. Re:$3,000 laptop by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Macbooks are pretty expensive, but they also use top quality parts throughout.

      Besides the fact that their keyboards had design defects for 2 generations, the same parts always burn out on them over several generations (typically voltage regulators), and they still can't figure out proper thermals with any of their laptops because form over fuction.

    23. Re:$3,000 laptop by tsa · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on everything except the 2-3 year battery life. If you treat it well a battery can easily live a useful life of 7 years. But having said that, because of everything else you mentioned I'm quite sure that my 8 year old MacBook Pro (still on its first battery) will be replaced by a sturdy Lenovo, HP or Dell when it dies. Running Linux of course. Windows is only usable for games.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    24. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your lap, Earthling.

    25. Re: $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thieves, drug lords, and terrorists.

      Good to know that apple is a terrorist contractor.

    26. Re: $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thieves, drug lords, and terrorists.

      Good to know that apple is a terrorist contractor.

      Wow, that's what? ... three logical fallacies in 14 words.

    27. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My laptop is a Lenovo running Windows, and it is over $2k. Macbooks are pretty expensive, but they also use top quality parts throughout. The same goes for other flagship machines such as Surface Pro/Book laptops and the Thinkpad P52 (what I have). I am having trouble finding configurations for a 17" 4k Dell with H series processors and all the other bells and whistles, but I bet it would be over $2k as well.

      The Mac tax on laptops is not that high. Comparable Windows laptops are almost as much, as long as you are really looking at comparable machines. I still built my own desktop though since you can easily save $1-2k on a top of the line build. I can't build my own laptop though.

      This is the problem, they are not looking at compatible laptops. They are looking at Asus or Toshiba Sunday specials that are made from cheap plastic and are heavy, loud, fat, and weak, and with 1/3rd the battery life on top and last 1/3rd as long.

    28. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a high-spec windows laptop. i7, etc. It's incredibly slow.

      There's good reason to pay more for a Mac. The IT team hasn't figured out how to spy-ware cripple the Macs to the point of making them slower than a 15-year-old machine.

      Until the PC security industry figures out how to make Macs impossible to function on, they're the right choice.

      'Cause they sure as hell aren't going to let you run Linux.

    29. Re:$3,000 laptop by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      They don't play well with corporate networks, they are virtually unserviceable, totally non-upgradeable now, have built-in 2-3 year obsolescence due to the glued-in batteries, and on the whole are a stupid waste of money.

      Writing this on my Macbook Pro which is now 6 1/2 years old, and also works just fine on our corporate network, while running the very latest version of Apple's operating system.

      It never ceases to amaze me how many mindless Apple zealots will stubbornly defend the abhorrent company who continuously screws them over more and more with each generation, and can't make a quality product without serious manufacturing flaws to save their life

      It never ceases to amaze me how much people will bitch about products that they don't even use.

    30. Re: $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the part where he said "it cost less and is still more powerful than the MacBook"?

      Methinks you did.

    31. Re: $3,000 laptop by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part where he said "it cost less and is still more powerful than the MacBook"?

      Methinks you did.

      And this Mac comparison would be true, but he replied to "there are still reasons to buy a $3k laptop" with the words "Not really", then proceeded to give an example configuration that can easily cost exactly that

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    32. Re: $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My $200, quad core atom, 4GB memory, 64GB sad 1kg Asus lasts about ten hours. Eight if I am watching mpg4 movies on a plane. Sure, it doesn't have Ethernet without resorting to a dongle. And it does have three USB ports and a built in microSD card slot... But neither do most of the Macbooks at this point. Either way I dock it when I get to my workspace, so I can use a real keyboard, mouse and 55" 4k monitor.

      Oh, and if I need more juice, it RDCs into my ryzen/TR hosted VMs just fine if I need extra CPU power.

    33. Re: $3,000 laptop by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      What tinkering do you have to do with a standard corporate laptop? I spend no time tinkering with mine.

    34. Re:$3,000 laptop by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

      Five minutes a day? When you're comparing with Windows laptops, don't forget to allow for the system-bogging antivirus app you have to keep running, the adware scanner you have to sweep with periodically, and calling IT to reimage the damn thing when your Windows updates suddenly stop installing.

    35. Re: $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those memory and especially storage device specs are laughably inadequate for many uses.

      What you have is a Chromebook, whether officially or in spirit.

      Chromebooks are great for a very limited number of use cases, better than a "real" laptop even, but admit that those use cases are quite limited.

    36. Re:$3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an ex Dell tech I can attest that their fantastic onsite warranty repairs are leagues ahead of any other brand. However, if you are happy with bottom of the barrel components, micron chipsets, bare minimum interconnects, cheap and nasty hardware, terrible thermal designs etc then by all means buy Dell. Me? I'd rather linux or macos anyday. Windows is just meh

    37. Re: $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mac Pro does not want to be a laptop.

    38. Re:$3,000 laptop by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Sometimes a $3K laptop is needed. I spend probably 70% of my working time remote - at clients, on business travel, etc. I have a fully-loaded Lenovo P71 (about $3800 new) because it has the horsepower needed to do advanced 3D modeling, PCB layout, FEA simulations, etc. Basically it's a portable workstation - and I use it as such. It has, of course, much more power than any equivalent-priced Macbook - but then I use mine to do real stuff, not just e-mail and docs and such.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re: $3,000 laptop by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      You mean he can't run an SQL server and four simultaneous virtual machines on it?

      I bought a cheap laptop this year, too. But I put a bigger drive in it and upped it to 8GB of memory. It's 'unsupported' with that amount of memory in it, but it works great.

    40. Re: $3,000 laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT support people have long felt threatened by the Mac.

    41. Re: $3,000 laptop by walllaby · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the value of a laptop that lets you accomplish the work that you need to do on a mobile basis. I regularly get work done in weekly status meetings that go over their allotted time, just because I bring my laptop into the room. I donâ(TM)t agree on it being a MacBook. As someone who uses a 2015 MacBook Pro as a daily driver, I can say that my windows PC at home is much more stable. I donâ(TM)t have to restart it just to get apps to run properly or stop my mouse from treating left clicks as tight clicks. Stability left the OS long ago, and I canâ(TM)t help but feel guilty for asking my employer to spend $2500 on a machine that actually makes me less productive. If Iâ(TM)m allowed another laptop, Iâ(TM)ll definitely be asking for an MSI or Dell. The time is past where my apps were Mac-only. Sincerely, disgruntled Apple user

    42. Re:$3,000 laptop by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      This is a common fallacy. Yes, it is entirely possible to find similar deals in the Windows realm, Windows is open and diverse. You can find even worse price gouging in the windows realm if you are dead set on getting screwed. Similarly, if I wanted I could spend $100K on a windows desktop, and if I tried hard enough I am sure I could even get it to under perform a Mac at 10x the cost.

      This does not change the fact that the Mac tax is very high. The Apple brand is one of the most prestigious brands in existence, you cannot seriously believe that Apple just gives away their products for peanuts out of the goodness of their hearts.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  2. no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 hou by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 hours a week + must live on site.

  3. Chinese slaves.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    have little teensy hands, being children. That's the secret sauce. That, along with paying them dirt wages and forcing them into shoddy dorms. #Chinapitalism.

    1. Re:Chinese slaves.. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2, Informative

      have little teensy hands, being children. That's the secret sauce. That, along with paying them dirt wages and forcing them into shoddy dorms. #Chinapitalism.

      China may have been late to the party taking steps to ban child labour; but in truth, although some companies may still use child labour it is illegal in China and highly punishable. There are other countries that are far worse offenders than China.

      You can blame China for a lot of things they do wrong; but they do punish people for using child labour... now.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re: Chinese slaves.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets get real. Poverty and no food etc isnâ(TM)t fun. I bet youâ(TM)d struggle if you didnâ(TM)t have a hot shower for 24 hours. Itâ(TM)s so easy to complain about people voluntarily giving up their time for food and iPhones. Fuck you and your real privilege.

  4. Re by pele · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article never showed the actual screw, I was hoping I'd see a screw...

    1. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the screws have to be made in the USA? Could they not ship a few hundred thousand over?

    2. Re:Re by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      The fact that the owner of the factory was running them over by hand in 1000-piece batches tells me they weren't planning their supply chain very well. Probably a late change to the design that needed to be produced with zero lead time. I'm sure they had them on a plane from China ASAP.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kinda would like to see the screw. I can understand (to a point) how an iPhone would need a bunch of customized screws. The tolerance, and space requirements are tight. But a desktop, or a laptop?! Are there not industry standard screws to put these things together. Do they really pay an engineer to spec a screw with unique thread and size requirements? Further, they are realizing the need for a specialized component during the manufacturing process, causing production to stop? It cannot be cost effective to design a screw, and pay a factory to retool, all on short notice. Then again, there is a reason their products cost so much, even with $2/hr Chinese labor.

    4. Re:Re by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *nod* I think a major element was they discovered the availability they could take for granted in China all of a sudden became supply chain issues when trying to build the same device in TX.

    5. Re:Re by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      I'm thinking the same thing. If Apple hasn't mastered supply chain qualifications, JIT, and the recipe of doing business in North America, then they should've had backup suppliers from China to fill the gap. 1000pc FedEx is expensive from Shenzen, sure, but you don't see other organizations opening up for business without being able to produce their product from a supply chain that's both ready but also able.

      I'm pretty shocked that they would respond in this media piece in the way that they did. Pretty junior.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    6. Re:Re by spth · · Score: 1

      As the article states, Apple kept changing the specifications on the screw on short notice, so they wanted a local manufacturer to avoid delays from shipping and long-distance-communication failures.

    7. Re:Re by spth · · Score: 1

      According to the article, Apple did so not only once, but kept making changes and requiring different screws at short notice. That was the reason they wanted a local screw manufacturer in the first place: So it would be able to adjust to changing requirements quickly.

    8. Re:Re by zferrini · · Score: 2, Informative

      I "WAS" a manufacturing engineer in the 90's. Before the Gov't taxed the companies so high that paying workers and paying taxes needed to find something that could make them competitive. Sadly, that meant moving that part of the business model out of the country. Enter NAFTA, this was the loophole that companies needed to move manufacturing out of the country without paying a huge fine. Once the plant was in Mexico, namely Juarez, they were free to move it overseas without a penalty. That one screw shows how much the US Gov't had a hand in destroying the livelihood of the workers in what they call the "Fly over States. And all of you wonder how Trump got elected, look only as far as the Federal Government. And you thought they were looking out for you, ha ha ha ha ha!

    9. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omfg could you not spend 5 minutes reading the article which explains this exact problem?

      and yes they did end up shipping them over. which caused delays.

    10. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wanted screws that owners could not remove.
       

    11. Re:Re by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      As the article states, Apple kept changing the specifications on the screw on short notice, so they wanted a local manufacturer to avoid delays from shipping and long-distance-communication failures.

      And apple have how much money? If they really wanted they could set up the entire supply chain on their own and then outsource capacity to other manufacturers in the US that need 15,000 2.765mm torx penta secu screws or whatever with zero lead time. Wouldn't that be a turn up for the books.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    12. Re:Re by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      If you read between the lines, Apple threw their assembler (Flextronics) under the bus and Flextronics has refused to comment on the story.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Apple products were held together with glue.

    14. Re:Re by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Then they should've been direct about Flextronics. They took low-hanging fruit, didn't have a backup plan, and failed to keep production moving.

      Due diligence requires making everything the salesperson utters is true. Other industry segments have highly skilled purchasing and industrial engineering, acquisition, and failsafes built into their DNA.

      This isn't about labor cost. This is about diligence and tenacity. Apple is used to the luxury of the hungry Chinese market who was enraptured about a big deal with an emblematic US company. In the US, it's a different turf. If they hadn't realized that, it's just another in a series of reality distortion fields: They work both ways.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    15. Re:Re by Rob+Y. · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Look, there's a chicken-and-egg thing going on here. I'm sure that back when electronic devices were made in the U.S.A., there were plenty of local custom screw manufacturers to support them - or else companies made do without custom screws. Now that the entire supply chain has moved offshore, it's going to be hard to move any of it back.

      But maybe if Apple really wanted to have a "Made in the U.S.A." model, they might have reconsidered using some crazy custom screw in the first place. Sure, in mobile handsets, where every nanometer counts in squeezing stuff in, maybe a custom screw really matters. But on a desktop computer? Really? I'm guessing that even in the good old days when Apple built all of its stuff in the US, they didn't have a practical option to use custom parts for such trivial functions as are performed by a screw. It's a screw, folks. The only reason to customize it is to prevent access to whatever it's holding together without a special tool built for that screw. Make do, Apple. If you really want to build in the US, build what today's supply chain can support. And grow the supply chain - just like you did in China, where there were no custom screw factories either back in the day...

      You don't have crazy man Steve Jobs to answer to any more, so you don't need to "keep changing the specs on short notice" to please him. Get your priorities straight and, if you decided that building in the US is the right thing, figure out what you need to do to make it happen.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    16. Re:Re by PPH · · Score: 1

      So, order screws that are used to assemble bathroom stall partitions.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    17. Re:Re by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

      While all you say definitely has merit, Apple charges a premium for desktops that are optimized in various ways that are dependent on the precise form factor, in a way other electronics companies do not bother.

      That Apple found the American manufacturer harder to work with, given their demanding style, is perfectly believable.

      I am skeptical how very meaningful this lesson is for anyone who is not building a superoptimized premium phone/mobile device or who is not Apple doing what Apple does. As there is explosive growth in tiny devices that talk to our phones, it is a question worth pondering carefully, at least for some companies.

    18. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Los Angeles. I know a machine shop in Los Angeles than can make 1000 screws an hour. Probably more. And that's just the one shop I know about.

    19. Re:Re by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Well, Apple may have been direct behind closed doors, for all we know. After the deal goes bad, they do not gain anything by overtly badmouthing Flextronics -- that only starts a pissing war that is a distraction for both companies.

      But you are basically agreeing that Apple could easily find American companies harder to work with.

      What that means for companies other than Apple is open to debate.

    20. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are wrong because tax rates have decreased both for personal income and corporate taxes. In the 80s and earlier US income taxes included brackets at 70% and higher rates on personal income for 100+ of years previously. Corporate taxes have existed since 1919, and were uniformly required by 1949. In 1951 corporate rates were actually 50.75% and typically 40%+ until 1980 when Reagan reduced them, and they they have since fallen to 20%. The decrease is what caused the problem where workers were shafted since corporates had low tax rates and even lower capital gains tax on dividends allowed for wealth to concentrate rather than be distributed to the workers who created it.

    21. Re:Re by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

      They discovered the availability they could take for granted in China all of a sudden became supply chain issues when trying to build the same device in TX.

      Ah, there's the problem. If they wanted to receive screws, they were supposed to buy them from RX, not TX.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    22. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The US still has the highest corporate tax rate in the world. It's not just taxes but burdensome regulations that have killed our manufacturing base.

    23. Re:Re by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      And getting stuck in customs for how long?

      --
      bickerdyke
    24. Re:Re by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but are they special Apple screws with weird heads? I mean, I'll take this part of the story at face value.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    25. Re:Re by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      It speaks to the perceived servility of hungry people in the stories I've read. It also speaks to this being a political move to placate accusations of balance of trade deficits, US labor problems, placating Chinese relationships, and much more.

      For better or worse, Apple (at least to me) ends up looking both stupid and not in control of their supply chain, while placating politicos in the US. They're not usually this stupid, although the perceived hubris is par.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    26. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US still has the highest corporate tax rate in the world. It's not just taxes but burdensome regulations that have killed our manufacturing base.

      The tax rate on the books is high, but there are so many ways to reduce that burden that the effective rate is on par with the rest of the world. Nothing killed US manufacturing. It is as strong as ever. What left is the jobs. US manufacturing produces just as much as ever, but with far far less workers.

    27. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rate is one of the highest, but once you take the deductions and credits allowed it's pretty much the same as the majority of countries.

    28. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easiest way to reduce that burden is to off-shore manufacturing altogether. Long way around that circle for you, wasn't it.

    29. Re:Re by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The key is (ROI * (1 - corporatetax) * (1 - Capgainstax) * (1 - Corruptiontax)). That number is pretty consistent, world wide. It Has to be, if your nation doesn't compete on after tax ROI it gets no investments.

      Of course ROI isn't guaranteed, past performance is not a guarantee...

      Accounting tricks don't generally get money back to the investors, which is where the rubber meets the road.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    30. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, you receive stuff from TX (to your RX). They are crossed after all.

      I did find it funny though, I promise!

    31. Re:Re by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Tooling requires lead time. But there is nothing magic about any of it. Screw making machines are old technology. I assume these dinky screws are made with hot rollers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    32. Re: Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has some of the lowest corporate tax rates. However, paying any taxes is significantly higher than paying no taxes, and so corporations use the differences in tax codes to avoid as many taxes as possible.
      This is why Microsoft of Ireland owns all Microsoft properties and contracts Microsoft of the US to handle the entire supply chain from R&D to shipping. Microsoft of the US pays no tax on its ptofits because on paper only Microsoft of Ireland has any profits. Meanwhile, Ireland doesn't tax profits made in foreign countries.
      I've heard people say we should eliminate our corporate taxes in order to bring that money back, except that's pointless since the money never actually left - the money never actually left since Microsoft of Ireland is little more than a PO box; it's all still here, just listed as "foreign investments" instead of domestic profits.

      This is how the game is played.

    33. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason to customize it is to prevent access to whatever it's holding together without a special tool built for that screw.

      And that doesn't work when using Chinese custom screws. The Chinese sells custom screwdrivers on the Internet, for every oddball screw they make. Doing this to prevent access is just stupid. Also, a DIY screwdriver is not that hard. . .

    34. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The screw in question.
        https://www.nytimes.com/2019/0...

    35. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they were supposed to by the from TX, but have TX ship them to RX.

      Duh.

    36. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a moran, look at his UID...

    37. Re:Re by corando · · Score: 1

      There are other websites for that :-)

    38. Re:Re by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The even-bigger red flag is that it is a custom screw. There are literally tens of thousands of screws available in massive bulk from McMaster Carr and others. Tell your engineers to use off-the-shelf connectors unless they can prove a 100% need for that screw - and get VP or higher level approval for it. A screw? Really? Designing a custom screw just tells me you have lazy mechanical engineers...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re:Re by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The US had a 35% Federal corporate tax rate until 2017 - it's not like that fall to 21% (not 20%) was a while ago...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    40. Re: Re by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Only to a certain point; if you buy capital equipment to build your business (say, you make screws and you need more CNC lathes), then you must depreciate that expense over several years. So you drop $1MM in capex, but you do not get to expense the entire purchase that first year, meaning some of those profits you wanted to lower by spending $1MM will still be taxed, and then you have to claim some of those back over the next few years.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    41. Re:Re by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Hey Apple, here's a solution. If your ME is custom-spec'ing screws - they're not a very good ME. There is precious little reason to use a custom screw, it would be VERY few and far-between uses, and definitely not one I could ever see for a desktop computer. Custom-designed screws are a lazy way out...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    42. Re:Re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole purpose of this custom screw is almost certainly to make the device purposely harder to take apart and repair. If Apple wasn't so customer-hostile they could just use a damn off the shelf part. But nooooo....

  5. Is it any wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big US companies sell out US and then wonder why later nothing can be built in the US? Thanks guys.

    1. Re:Is it any wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, he kept his word.

      Timothy D. Cook, went on prime-time television to announce that Apple would make a Mac computer in the United States.

      They build 1 Mac in the US. And only then ran out of screws.

    2. Re:Is it any wonder by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Big US companies sell out US and then wonder why later nothing can be built in the US? Thanks guys.

      It's only because they didn't want to pay you. Now the ones that are left are slowly being swapped out for robot workers.....built in china.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  6. You don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't screw China; China screws you!

    Or wait, maybe - In Communist China fastener screws you!

    It must have been one of those.

  7. History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well... The US is no longer a manufacturing country, that was the last century. This century is different.

    1. Re:History by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      We're manufacturing more than ever. It's just that usually it's higher up the food chain than screws.

    2. Re:History by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      We're number 2 in manufacturing output, with $3.6 trillion in output. That's more than the GDP of all but 4 countries (the US included).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  8. Impossible! by Pyramid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If only it was possible to engineer a product using readily available parts instead of custom items specifically designed to stifle repairs and create vendor lock-in. ...if only it was possible...

    --
    ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    1. Re:Impossible! by omnichad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's not stop there on the excuse train. They could still import the screws and manufacture in the US.

    2. Re:Impossible! by NixieBunny · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must not know much about what goes into a modern electronics product. The phones and tablets and laptops being sold today are too small for off-the-shelf fasteners to be used. I make Nixie tube wristwatches in the USA, and I use the smallest American screw I can get to hold them together. That screw is about twice as big as the average screw in a modern phone.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    3. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple will fall light once mighty giant (all apples fall really). Hubris does it all the damn time!

    4. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it was possible to engineer a product using readily available parts instead of custom items specifically designed to stifle repairs and create vendor lock-in. ...if only it was possible...

      Congratulations on your successful karma whoring. Now what exactly does this have to do with the non-existence of screw suppliers in the US? ... or do these screw shortages only affect Apple and not Android device makers?

    5. Re:Impossible! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Except that phones are a common product these days, and standard screws exist for assembling them. Besides, we're not talking about a phone or smartwatch, but about a desktop computer (Mac Pro).

    6. Re:Impossible! by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      That sounds ike something I'd really like to own... unfortunately, I haven't worn a wristwatch in a decade...

    7. Re:Impossible! by Vanyle · · Score: 3, Funny

      I got an idea, why not use one of the already custom made screws you have instead of creating a new custom-made screw? ooo, i have an idea. With new modern CNC machines you can simply have a serialized system where each screw needs its own bit, and the repair techs have to 3d print a new driver bit for each individual screw when it comes time to work on them!

    8. Re:Impossible! by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Let's not stop there on the excuse train. They could still import the screws and manufacture in the US.

      Assemble not manufacture.

    9. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >phones and tablets and laptops being sold today

      You're being awfully smug for not knowing what product this article is about.

    10. Re:Impossible! by hackertourist · · Score: 2

      All those custom screws are pointless anyway. Within a few months, screwdriver manufacturers start adding your custom design to their range, and your custom screw is now as accessible as all the previous attempts. All it does is create an annoyance as people have to update their screwdriver sets.

    11. Re:Impossible! by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think part of the issue is that these screws are common in China, but in the US they require special runs. Not enough companies in the US use them to justify their mass market here.

    12. Re:Impossible! by hey! · · Score: 1

      But the point is that things are readily available in China that are only available in limited quantity here.

      In engineering, that's what we call a "constraint". You have more constraints if you design something to be manufactured in the US, which means the set of designs which can be made here is a subset of the set of designs that can be made in China.

      This is no accident. I was in my 30s when the decision was made essentially to deindustrialize the US by opening up trade with China. We were explicitly told that China would become better at making things while the US would focus on selling services. Under this system, we would get things like incredibly cheap consumer electronics.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said!!!

    14. Re:Impossible! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Assemble not manufacture.

      The smarter approach to the problem is to not create a trade war and throwing a shitfit. The smarter approach is to start somewhere, and gradually push for more work. It seems more important to focus on one sector that we view as most important or that we're losing the most money on, and bring as much of that in as we can, or at least, diversify our supply chain out of China at least.

      Unfortunately that is an unnatural act that requires significant and careful government meddling to make happen. Not some toddler wielding a giant hammer, bashing anything that gets in his way.

    15. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The smarter approach to the problem is to not create a trade war and throwing a shitfit.

      Yeah. We should just treat Nazi governments like any other decent, honest, reliable group of murders.

    16. Re:Impossible! by tdailey · · Score: 1

      If only it was possible to engineer a product using readily available parts ...

      I can't agree with this more. I'm not an engineer; I'm just a DIY guy who needs to deal with their choices when doing repairs to my car or dishwasher or computer. To me, the amount of "custom" screws, nuts, and connectors in products is insane. The increased cost of spec'ing a unique, custom screw can't be trivial, especially when there's 100 existing, ready-made variants that would meet the need.

    17. Re:Impossible! by StuartHankins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ding ding ding, finally someone who understands the issue.

      If we are to bring back manufacturing to the US, we have to start somewhere. Companies who have large volume and specialty requirements probably won't be the first ones leading this, there are way too many dependencies to make this happen. We need some smaller companies with more mainstream needs to lead the way.

    18. Re:Impossible! by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can I put you in touch with Fastnal? Cause our company uses those tiny ass-as-shit screws that are used in cellphones and laptops in our products. They have no problems getting them to either import or doing batch runs of 2000 units, we use one of their local branch offices and have yet to see a delay or missed shipment.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    19. Re:Impossible! by Shotgun · · Score: 0

      The smarter approach to the problem is to not create a trade war and throwing a shitfit.

      I bet you're all behind unions when they go on strike, aren't you? You know, that logic that says, "We're not making enough money, so we will quit working to make more money."

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    20. Re:Impossible! by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And you would think that a major manufacturer in the US would know that and would not constrain their own business around the issue. I mean, YOU know it. And, now, *I* know it. You would think someone at Apple would have a clue and could schedule an air drop of a box of screws.

      BTW, I also witnessed, first hand, an assembly line shutdown for a day over an 8oz bottle of Loctite.
      They were also considered idiots.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    21. Re:Impossible! by doom · · Score: 1

      As long as a significant percentage of mac-heads will insist on getting screwdrivers blessed by the rainbow beachball itself, Apple will keep screwing them with non-standard -- I mean, elite, custom-designed-- products.

    22. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FTFA:

      By the time the computer was ready for mass production, Apple had ordered screws from China.

      The headline is typical NYT fake news.

    23. Re:Impossible! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Why would we want to bring back manufacturing to the US? Do you want to waste our resources when we can enjoy greater wealth and higher standards of living engaging in open trade?

      Instead of nurses, we can have factory workers. Seems legit.

    24. Re:Impossible! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You also got tons of labor freed up for healthcare and using commercial electronics to build high-speed Internet and Netflix.

    25. Re:Impossible! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      What union going on strike could have as big an impact as a ham-fisted trade war between two superpowers?

      And we know damn well that the reason you bitch about it is because it works. Unions and collective worker action in general are the sole engine of human progress for the vast majority of humans.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    26. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So to start, we aren't talking about phones. We are talking about desktop computers. They should use a standard #6 hex machine screw which you can get for days. Even Home Depot stocks them in bulk. Of course this is Apple we are talking about so they likely use something esoteric because fuck you. The #6 hex machine screw is one of the most common screw types around because of how ubiquitous they are. If Apple has supply issues then its entirely their fault.

      Also there is nothing special about screws used in mobile electronics. Millions of smartphones and tablets are made every year and they use standard fasteners. I can buy drivers to match these standard sizes from multiple manufacturers all day. Wiha, who makes great drivers even has prepackaged kits with the specific drivers for Apple mobile devices.

    27. Re:Impossible! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They could, but not without additional costs. Manufacturing is often "just in time", as in the truck carrying screws arrives about 15 minutes before they get loaded into the machine and installed in iPhones. That way they don't need a lot of on-site storage.

      When screws are coming on the slow boat from China you need to keep months of them in stock. For high volume products that's a lot of screws, not to mention all the other parts.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:Impossible! by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I'll add that most of HP's desktops and servers are assembled in the U.S. They don't seem to be having any problems getting screws despite being the #2 computer maker by volume, so they probably sell 2-3 orders of magnitude more PCs than Mac Pros.

    29. Re:Impossible! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I really don't think screws need to count. Especially if you're ready to cancel the whole plan because of it

    30. Re:Impossible! by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      "You must not know much about what goes into a modern electronics product. The phones and tablets and laptops being sold today are too small for off-the-shelf fasteners to be used. I make Nixie tube wristwatches in the USA, and I use the smallest American screw I can get to hold them together. That screw is about twice as big as the average screw in a modern phone."

      I've often wondered if some people find comfort in making baseless assumptions; it would explain quite a bit.

      The given example was that Apple couldn't build an American PC for want of a custom screw. The problem is easy to avoid; engineer it so you don't need that special screw. I suspect companies get in this position when they focus on creating sexy anodized aluminum trashcans instead of functionality.

      Never the less, they could still source Chinese screws, a low cost item and claim "Made in America". Products do not have to contain 100% American parts to claim this - that's (partially) why we have Hondas that are "Made in America" and Chryslers that aren't

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    31. Re:Impossible! by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Nobody insists on "getting screwdrivers blessed by the rainbow beachball itself,". Mac users just live with it because the alternatives are worse.

    32. Re:Impossible! by StuartHankins · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is a national security issue to have independent manufacturing facilities. We don't want to be dependent on other countries' cooperation even if it's our fault we cause the relationship to be tarnished. As we have discovered it becomes more and more difficult to do this as time progresses and processes become even more intertwined and sophisticated.

      There is no reason we cannot have both nurses and factory workers. Everyone needs to eat, give the available hands another opportunity to earn money and help them succeed in society. We cannot be a complete nation without our blue-collar brothers and sisters, and it is morally wrong to want that.

    33. Re:Impossible! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's the point: China can't go to war with the US because China's economy would collapse before it gets off the ground.

      Bringing it all back in-house here means our economy loses a sizable bit of GDP. Imagine America, the impoverished, sitting 20% lower in economic power than anyone else, unable to raise a military capable of defending against the modern military of Russia and China. That's a huge national security issue.

      We have blue-collar workers; they're just working on different things. Our nation has a limited amount of labor available, and you have to allocate it by demand. What you propose is essentially just increasing poverty and putting strain on working Americans, which is morally wrong.

      You know what else is morally wrong? Not giving the workers a fair share. The minimum wage was 67% of per-capita income in the 50s and 60s. As we got wealthier per person, we adjusted it to inflation...meaning I get 10% wealthier, you get 0% wealthier because you're the least-paid worker. Had we adjusted it properly to follow per-capita income growth, the minimum wage in 2016 would have been $19.33/hr.

      The population would also have been around 270 million.

      Minimum wage falling as a percentage of per-capita income means all incomes from lower-middle up can purchase more low-wage labor--your fast food workers and retail shelf stockers. That means an expansion in the poverty sector, as jobs are available. A labor shortage draws up wages, and encourages expansion of population and labor force...which then satisfies the shortage and creates competition, allowing wages to reduce again to that minimum wage level, always giving you a growing poverty base.

      Every way you slice it, the attempt at United States Communism won't work. We cannot build a planned economy and expect it to lead to anything but systemic collapse.

    34. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a national security issue to have independent manufacturing facilities. We don't want to be dependent on other countries' cooperation

      USA will fall in 20 minutes without foreign coffee. Can we produce enough to be self-sufficient? Care to re-think your stupidity?

    35. Re:Impossible! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      20 years ago I'd have said no, unions suck. But then I joined the workforce, and learned the score. Generally yes, I would support unions the majority of the time. I am not blind to their faults, but I have absolutely no trust or respect for corporate management at any level, and I am management. The difference is that I can simply quit and get a new job at the snap of my fingers. Not everyone can do that, for them, unions are a must.

    36. Re:Impossible! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      >

      Let's not stop there on the excuse train. They could still import the screws and manufacture in the US.

      Assemble not manufacture.

      So, if they buy the screws from an local company, they're manufacturing the iWhatever locally, but if they buy the screws from a foreign company, they're "assembling, not manufacturing"?

      I suspect that, by that definition, we can safely say that very little is manufactured in any country....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    37. Re:Impossible! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Growing up in Seattle, Aerospace worker union strikes were a regular thing. And they always seemed to last 7 to 10 weeks. I got curious about that in high school and did a little math - it turns out the increase in wages the union was "demanding" over the next 3 year contract was about the same amount that the company didn't pay during the strike. So the workers would strike, demanding $10,000 more over 3 years. The company would stall until about $10,000 in wages had not been paid, then would capitulate - and the workers would walk out all proud realizing they struck for essentially zero.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    38. Re:Impossible! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      This is a desktop, not a phone/tablet. And M1.6x2 screws are readily available at McMaster Carr and other sources. Those are smaller than you'd ever need on a desktop. But if you wanted those iPhone screws (the smallest is their TS1, which is a bone-stock M0.8x2 with a weird 5 lobed drive), you can get them domestically without much issue.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re:Impossible! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That can make sense, it still applies upward wage pressures onto the manufacturer - they lose productivity while the worker loses nothing. If the company was smart they'd raise pay enough to prevent more strikes and thus more losses of productivity. Then they'd both come out ahead.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    40. Re:Impossible! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Although the article mentions the iPhone in its title, the article itself is talking about Apple's trashcan-shaped desktop computer. The big one.

      Heck, I'm surprised Apple even uses screws instead of gluing the things shut, like what they actually do to their phones.

    41. Re:Impossible! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Except that phones are a common product these days, and standard screws exist for assembling them.

      No they don't. You just think they do. A lot of people do, it's what often leads to botched repairs. There was a good video on youtube showing what happens when an iPhone was assembled with a screw that was 0.1mm out of spec.

    42. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make each screw like an ABLOY key.

    43. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no indication at all that Fastnal is a manufacturer of the products they sell. Most likely they are sourcing them from China. So Fastnal is a middleman between a company and various Chinese manufacturers. Simplifies the supply chain, but adds cost and communication complexity for larger companies such as Apple who can afford to handle it in house.

    44. Re:Impossible! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      This was my thought. It's not like there is a big scarcity of screw standards or sizes. The question to ask is why they were using a "custom screw" in the first place. This wasn't a iphone or even a macbook, these were full sized workstations. I'm sure they had some tight real estate, however I've built ITX boxes before with retail components just fine.

      I call BS on the whole screw story, the need for it, the implausible Texas "screw factory", it all smells of baloney to me. Oh we *HAD* to move everything to China, just think of the SCREWS!

  9. Bad excuse, bring the supply chain back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Globalization is the term used by US corporations to move jobs to cheaper locals. The Chines, now the 2nd largest economy in the world, demanded that if you want to do business in China you need to build and share your IP; Apple has obliged. Off course you can now buy Iphone 6s in copies, running IOS, in Vietnam for around $150; the price to pay for cheap labor. If digressing however if Apple wants to do business in the largest economy in the world they need to move the supply chain back, period.

    1. Re:Bad excuse, bring the supply chain back by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Can you link me to this phone I would ike to buy a few backups...

  10. Why is that really an issue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Soooo if you don't have enough screws produced locally, you just order more from China... exactly what Apple did.

    That kind of basic part seems like it should be easy enough to predict need of ahead of time, and cheap enough that pre-ordering a rough amount of material you might need would not cost much.

    I still don't see any real barrier to assembling some things here, and over time trying to ramp up local production to levels required.

    The alternate link states "if the NYT report is accurate, it's unlikely that it will be entirely made in the U.S." - but I see the opposite as being true. It seems like lessons learned will mean that Apple will have been more careful about what they can produce locally vs. what they still need to order from China in order to assemble computers in the U.S. I'm pretty sure that is still a big goal for them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why is that really an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on what, your gut feelings? Apple already has marketing people, they have scripts and everything. Your blathered bullshit doesn't really do much for their PR effort, breathless though you are.

      It's hilarious you pretend to be a manufacturing whiz along with everything else we all know you know nothing about. Just because a story has Apple in it doesn't mean it requires you shilling and tapdancing, lady.
         

    2. Re:Why is that really an issue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I used to be involved in PCB manufacture when younger, but don't let my actual experience slow your sarcastic roll Captain McSnarky!

      Based on what experience exactly do you think I am wrong? Oh, none whatsoever? Yeah, thought so.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Why is that really an issue by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      That kind of basic part seems like it should be easy enough to predict need of ahead of time, and cheap enough that pre-ordering a rough amount of material you might need would not cost much.

      With Just-in-Time manufacturing, what you've described doesn't work. You don't order a rough amount of material, say a million screws. You order exactly what you need and have it delivered when you need it and it saves millions in storage, inventory, and waste.

      I still don't see any real barrier to assembling some things here, and over time trying to ramp up local production to levels required.

      The barrier is that Joe Business, the guy that owns the company that makes the screws, is going to be extremely reluctant to drop a couple of million bucks on new screw machines when he knows the demand will evaporate the moment the MAGA hats go back in the closet.

    4. Re:Why is that really an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you weren't, many-times-caught lying faggot.

  11. How the hell can you fund a company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...with 20 employees on 1000 screws a day? Wouldn't that bring in like maybe $10 total daily?

    1. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by Vanyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would guess these are not rolled screws. Precision custom screws like this can easily cost > $1 each. One set that we make costs $10 for a screw that is about .250" long

    2. Re: How the hell can you fund a company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably the company did other things, too.

    3. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      ...with 20 employees on 1000 screws a day? Wouldn't that bring in like maybe $10 total daily?

      These are iScrews.

      I wonder if the imported screws have tariffs slapped on them. That would be hilariously ironic.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      These are custom made, not mass produced, so they won't be cheap. And there's probably only one machine in the shop that can be used to make the screws. One employee, eight hour shift, two screws a minute equals 960 screws a day, so it's in the right ballpark.

    5. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      You ever hear of CNC? They set up the machines and leave it.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re: How the hell can you fund a company... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Tell investers that you are an app developing company amd have 18 of those 30 build a screw-apple app.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not exactly leave it, but a single person could monitor multiple machines and intervene when strange noises starts to come from one.

    8. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      These are iScrews.

      Well, they're special because they have rounded edges.

      Oh, wait..

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    9. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which begs the question - Why the hell do I need custom screws for a desktop computer where space is not a a premium...

      Seems like a poor design decision to me...

    10. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      More than one customer?

    11. Re:How the hell can you fund a company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it's safe to assume that this company had clients other than Apple! It's just that they only have a single one of the million-dollar screw machines that is required to make one of the tiny custom fasteners Apple ordered. Being only a 20-person company they cannot just buy a bunch of the million-dollar machines to ramp up production because they probably don't have the capital to acquire them, or the business to put them to use after the Apple contract ends, or the ability to source such specialized machines in time.

      If they were a company that just sold tiny screws, they'd probably have the kind of tooling necessary to pump them out by the millions, but the US doesn't have a big enough market for that kind of company to exist.

      dom

  12. Special screw... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they have just ordered the custom screws air-shipped from a Chinese factory or redesigned the thing to use a more ordinary screw? I wonder what's so special about that particular screw. Is it a "tamper proof head" like Apple's 5-point "Torx" security screws to keep mere plebs from opening the hardware?

    1. Re:Special screw... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they have just ordered the custom screws air-shipped from a Chinese factory or redesigned the thing to use a more ordinary screw? I wonder what's so special about that particular screw. Is it a "tamper proof head" like Apple's 5-point "Torx" security screws to keep mere plebs from opening the hardware?

      I think the whole point here was to make the things as completely in the US as possible and it turned out that US industry cannot even handle large volume screw production. Additionally Trump's useless steel tariffs aren't helping any entrepreneurially minded US'ians trying to fix this market gap to compete with the Chinese since I don't think screw manufacturing is a high margin business and tariffs are not helpful in that respect

    2. Re:Special screw... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      and it turned out that US industry cannot even handle large volume screw production.

      The problem is not large volume screw production... its large volume custom screw production with very short notice given.
      Don't expect to go to a factory with a custom product design and expect to have a huge volume of them manufactured for reasonable cost without any lead time.

      It takes setup time and money to build out a certain amount of production capacity.

    3. Re:Special screw... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

    4. Re:Special screw... by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      Were they restricted by their contract with the one screw machine shop from contracting additional machine shops to bump up supply?

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    5. Re:Special screw... by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. American manufacturing can make anything - if you are willing to spend the money. Apple easily could have paid for the manufacturer to increase the manufacturer's capacity.

      This is corporate bullshit double speak and you're buying in. The reality is that American manufacturing couldn't make it cheaply enough. That's it. And that's a direct result of the wage imbalances and government structure that's caused a giant manufacturing drain from every 1st world country into China for the last 20 or 30 years.

    6. Re:Special screw... by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      They are talking months here though, plenty of time to get a project like this going. It just screams bad management, or something else entirely. The 1,000 screws / day was a supplier of apple's supplier. They probably had a shop they normally worked with or something.

    7. Re:Special screw... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      ... if you are willing to spend the money ...

      ... without any regard for cost-effectiveness. I love how you Trump conservatives always manage make the case that companies should move production back to the US without any regard for the effect that has on their ability to compete. Nobody is moving production back to the US unless they can be sure that they will be able to compete effectively with Huwei, Xiaomi and the rest of the new Chinese tiger corporations and they won't be doing that if they are subsidising jobs in the US to make components they can get cheaper elsewhere.

    8. Re:Special screw... by Freischutz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      and it turned out that US industry cannot even handle large volume screw production.

      The problem is not large volume screw production... its large volume custom screw production with very short notice given. Don't expect to go to a factory with a custom product design and expect to have a huge volume of them manufactured for reasonable cost without any lead time.

      It takes setup time and money to build out a certain amount of production capacity.

      If you want to compete in the modern manufacturing business you have to get used to the idea of ramping up production at very short notices because the Chinese did that a long time ago. The MAGA crowd pisses and moans about jobs being 'un-patriotically outsourced' but it's about more than that. The Chinese simply kicked the US's as at this sort of thing decades ago and apparently they are still doing it. If you can't go from a CAD drawing to spitting out custom screws or whatever other component the customer wants in a matter of days using robotic lathes, presses, milling machines etc... and do it at high volumes you might as well not bother competing, this is not a game for slow movers.

    9. Re: Special screw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is Apple needed 100,000 custom screws per Mac Pro sold. That adds up to almost a half million screws per week.

    10. Re:Special screw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "USians".. you sound retarded. It's Americans, get over it. It's how the rest of the world has always referred to US citizens. It's in the name of the country, unlike yours.

  13. So it WILL be assembled in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just with Chinese screws.

  14. It's a chicken and egg problem by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 2

    China didn't start out with multiple vendors to provide the hardware. They grew it over time.

    Manufacturing in the US is sustainable and it doesn't have be for slave wages either. It takes automation and time to ramp up suppliers. But, this can't happen over night. Apple knows that. And those screws? They can get the material from China overnight. The connections are still there. Apple just doesn't know them because they lost connection with their own supply chain.

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    1. Re:It's a chicken and egg problem by jythie · · Score: 1

      And on the other end of the chicken, China is where most of the process engineers and other people who specialize in figuring out how to alter designs to optimize manufacturing are based out of. Not much call for them in the US so they are fewer around, harder to hire, and tend to be less experienced.

    2. Re:It's a chicken and egg problem by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      China didn't start out with multiple vendors to provide the hardware. They grew it over time.

      Manufacturing in the US is sustainable and it doesn't have be for slave wages either. It takes automation and time to ramp up suppliers. But, this can't happen over night. Apple knows that.

      No, but that's not the whole picture. As pointed out in TFA, the supplier got rid of a press that could have made them because there wasn't enough demand when competing with cheaper overseas suppliers; the supplier switched to higher value small production runs to stay in business. In order for a company to invest in the machinery they need to be relatively certain they will make a profit and their investment will pay off. High volume commodity parts isn't a safe bet in most cases. Apple or whomever could shutdown a line or go elsewhere to save some money and the company would be stuck with an expensive non-producing piece of equipment.

      And those screws? They can get the material from China overnight. The connections are still there. Apple just doesn't know them because they lost connection with their own supply chain.

      Reading TFA it seems Apple outsourced work to Flextronics and for whatever reason they messed up the supply chain.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  15. I've made "not Apples" here. by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apples can be made here just fine. If they give up on their image mandates and want to just infiltrate the market they're perfectly capable. People who recognize my user name recognize me as being highly critical of Apple. What few know is that my first electronics industry job back in 1996 was related to Apple. I manufactured Mac Clones. Legal, lawful ones under contract from Motorola. They weren't far different from normal PCs of the era, they were little beige boxes with standard PC components, they had an electronically ejected floppy drive instead of the standard mechanical push button of the era, and everything was SCSI instead of IDE, but I must say there was an appeal to using off the shelf components. I lost my job when Steve Jobs got his job back, killing clones was one of the first things he did.

    If Apple was having trouble getting a particular screw in the computer world then it wasn't a normal screw.

    Indeed their reliance on tri-wings and other "don't you dare fix this yourself!" products instead of normal, mass produced, easy to get screws is half their problem.

    What this article leaves out is the United States used to be like China is now when it comes to manufacturing. Our politicians sold us out. We've been financially punished through specific taxes and targeted labor practices from that are designed to keep us from succeeding in the manufacturing world. Most of this was done in the George H.W. Bush era, but it wasn't exclusive to him. Every president between Reagan and Trump, and I'm not so sure about Reagan in his second term, has sold the United States to foreign interest. The reason we aren't setup to do what Apple is bitching we can't do was government sabotage of our own industry.

    #1 Use normal fucking screws
    #2 Stop allowing our politicians to sell us out - flush the toilet occasionally and replace the contents up on the hill
    #3 Educate yourself about what's going on

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by Somervillain · · Score: 1

      In order to help us on #3, can you elaborate on #2? I am not doubting you. I just want to be more educated on this topic and am not certain what you're referring to.

    2. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't feed the monkeys.. they become accustomed to the attention.

    3. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by Megol · · Score: 2

      No the ones that sold you out are the manufacturers that want to make as much money as possible and the consumers that want to buy products as cheap as possible even if made by slave labor. And don't forget the voters.

      Reap what you sow.

    4. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, did you work for Steve Khang at Power Computing?

    5. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      StarMax Mac Clones

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    6. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every president between Reagan and Trump, and I'm not so sure about Reagan in his second term, has sold the United States to foreign interest.

      Go fuck yourself. The (little) people were sold out to the elites. Stop blaming shit on us foreigners.

    7. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Most of this was done in the George H.W. Bush era

      The erosion of US manufacturing power started many decades before this. After WWII, we rebuilt Europe and Japan under the Marshall Plan with, for example, better steel making technology than we had domestically available in the US. We literally paid for our former enemies to be able to manufacture things better and cheaper than we could, and domestic manufacturers couldn't compete. Over the next few decades, combined with abuses by unions, unfavorable tax laws, new environmental regulations that other countries didn't have, and yes, greed on the part of the mill owners, US steel production faded into the rear view mirror. US Steel and iron production peaked in 1973, decades before GHWB and well before Reagan, and precipitously declined during the recession that began in the late 1970s under Carter. Seriously, quit making things partisan issues when there's tons of history that proves otherwise.

    8. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by pecosdave · · Score: 2

      I'm not blaming foreigners for wanting to make a buck. I'm blaming the ones we've elected to serve us for putting policies in place to ensure that U.S. based companies cannot compete on a fair market. I don't even really believe in protectionism. It makes sense from a logistical perspective to buy something locally instead of from over seas, but there's reasons to buy internationally as well. We don't buy Swiss and French cheeses because they're cheaper. I buy German screw drivers because they're better. I buy American milk an honey because they come from right here and it's readily available. Some things make sense to buy locally, some don't. For policies to be put in place to intentionally manipulate our own companies into failure for the benefit of whoever ponied up a bribe (often China but not always). The absolute best undeniable example I can think of is the steel industry.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    9. Re:I've made "not Apples" here. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      This is probably the best reply to my post out of all of them. Yes, you said things differently than me, but it appears to be well researched and not just "you're not on my team!" drivel like the rest. Than and you're not an A/C.

      You have my respect.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  16. how about using standard screws? by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    Suprised that one one produces pentalobe screws (Apple proprietary)!? A hint try screws that look like: (+) or (-)

    1. Re:how about using standard screws? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try screws that look like a Star of David. Standard Torx, less prone to stripping than (+) or (-) screws, yet a set of bits can be bought cheaply. i.e. not "tamperproof" shit.

    2. Re:how about using standard screws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ah yes, the jewdriver.

    3. Re:how about using standard screws? by kiviQr · · Score: 1

      How much torque do you need on a phone screw? I do not mind Torx - but they invent new screws so you cannot open the device and complain that one one produces them.

    4. Re:how about using standard screws? by aberglas · · Score: 1

      I needed to buy a five(!) pointed screw driver to open an iPhone (5?).

      Must have some very special technical advantage over a normal screw.

    5. Re:how about using standard screws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robertson head is the best. Nothing compares.

    6. Re:how about using standard screws? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How much torque isn't the only function. Maximum torque possible is too, as your screws get smaller the amount of torque you can apply reduces dramatically.

      But that's still no justification for pentalobe which offers no benefits over torx.

    7. Re:how about using standard screws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try screws that look like a Star of David. Standard Torx, less prone to stripping than (+) or (-) screws, yet a set of bits can be bought cheaply. i.e. not "tamperproof" shit.

      They may be technically better, but Slashdot posters aren't going to choose a technically sound option if it triggers their anti-semitism. They would choose easily strippable cross-type screws, causing their business to be easily out-competed by similar ones in developing nations.

  17. screw sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It shows something. Apples commitment to non-user serviceable parts maybe.

  18. Bullshit by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    The answer then is to go to the machine shop and ask what it will take them to increase their output 2x, 3x,4x, etc and supply the loans neccessary to make it happen.

    This is how every German, Chinese, Japanese, and we'll pretty much every other foreign business works with its domestic suppliers .

    It seems Apple just was looking for an excuse.

    Doubly so, GE and several car manufacture have plants in Texas where they have the pull to get whatever screws they need. Those factories just aren't in hip and cool Austin.

      Maybe if tech companies could lose their hard one for that boring college town, they'd be able to realize the benefits of domestic manufacturing.

    1. Re:Bullshit by Vanyle · · Score: 2

      There is something wrong here, much more than just that. A screw machine should be able to spit a screw out in seconds. They do this in a single pass using a guide bushing to take the heavy cuts and than finish on a secondary spindle. Maybe 5 seconds a part. This type of machine is very common, it is not super expensive (maybe around $150k) They are probably also paying 10x the price for it as well, as screw machines often times are used for lights out operation, meaning no operator other than to load the bar feeder once in a while and can run 24/7.

      i would guess whoever is assembling it in Texas has a buddy nearby and went with them, or only did a search based on proximity. Maybe someone with a secondary agenda or someone getting kickbacks as well?

    2. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse than that, it seems Apple's only real innovation these days is vertical integration. Why wouldn't something simple like screws be a part of their manufacturing chain? It would seem odd that such a complex product would be reliant on the Chinese for something so simple.

      You're right, this has to be some kind of excuse. For what? I'm not sure.

    3. Re:Bullshit by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 2
      To be fair, Apple has developed a rather shitty reputation in the supply-chain universe for doing just that. Becoming %60+ of a vendor's business for a few quarters (if you are lucky!) just to pull out because someone else can save you $.001 per part is devastating to the supplier unless Apple footed the bill for infrastructure improvements to scale up, and even then, you can put a successful business on life support by disrupting enough of their durable business with your temporary gigantic order.

      You reference Germany, Japan, and China in the same breath, even though they represent 3 vastly different points on the spectrum for this sort of thing. German suppliers are happy to tell you to get bent if you suggest they radically change what is profitable for them just to bump up 2 quarters of revenue (that's a uniquely American perspective, really...) Japan is likely to use a banking environment favorable to domestic business to underwrite it instead of either party actually fronting cash, and China is just going to tell you what to do.

      --
      Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    4. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a 20 person shop can only deliver 1000 screws per day? Assuming an 8 hour day, that means it is taking almost 10 man/minutes to produce each single screw?!?

    5. Re:Bullshit by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "Assuming an 8 hour day"

      No, you are assuming the entire output of the shop devoted to one SKU for one customer. No rational business owner would take that contract, since when the day comes when that one customer decides to use a different screw you now have all of this capacity that you can't sell.

    6. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually know someone who owns a bolt and screw manufacturing company in Austin. He says give them a few weeks for tooling/design and they will either make you all the screws you need, or they will get them for you elsewhere.

      Apple is intentionally creating a false shortage.

    7. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read TFA. The problem is that the screw manufacturer doesn't have the "stamp" process anymore. The owner sold off the quick and cheap process machines for custom milling machines which take longer to produce a screw.

      And this is just the screw. I'm sure the same problem pops up in for many of the parts. It's not economically sound to compete with the Chinese for the mass produced products so we have shifted the focus to custom - or programmable - manufacturing. Lower yield, higher price.

    8. Re:Bullshit by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Something that small, they likely just squeeze them between hot threaded rollers. The custom tooling was only the head as even Apple uses standard threads.

      But that's a business with such low margins it's all in low cost countries. Apples problem is not using off the shelf 'penny parts'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Bullshit by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      TFA says that the company used to have a machine that could mass-produce the desired screws. But sold it when the demand for mass-produced screws went to China and the US company shifted its operations to higher-precision screws. Which take longer to make because of the smaller tolerances.

    10. Re:Bullshit by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      Screw machines generally give a better tolerance as well. The stock is supported against a bushing during the cutting operation. The only reason to sell the machines would be if you no longer had the need for them because you didn't have the work to fill them up. They may be a little harder to program I suppose, but not terrible. Still doesn't explain why the company assembling these things didn't go with a company that had the proper equipment to make the parts.

    11. Re:Bullshit by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      If they are rolling the threads / stamping the threads this should take even less time (a second or less each). Many screws that use standard threads with funny shaped heads are still machined as you don't have to reform the head. Rolled threads are stronger than cut threads. Maybe the reason why the screws kept breaking in the complaint videos for their other products are they are cut instead of rolled?

      They definitely should have used off the shelf components for this, no doubt about that. All I am saying with this is that a US company should have no issue making the parts in the time they needed, someone just screwed the pooch in sourcing, or had motivation to go somewhere else.

    12. Re:Bullshit by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't explain why the company assembling these things didn't go with a company that had the proper equipment to make the parts.

      That would be the point of TFA: There wasn't another company that "had the proper equipment". Because bulk manufacturing had been outsourced for long enough that the US suppliers got out of that market.

      Getting back into that market requires capital outlays that can not be justified just with Apple's order - the higher-speed machines would fill the annual order in a week and then have 51 idle weeks.

    13. Re:Bullshit by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      Oh, I also don't think they heat the threaded rollers. They might, but I have never seen that.

    14. Re:Bullshit by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      I am not saying screw-rolling equipment, which us manufactures still use (te-co is one example), granted not for standard fasteners. Those would make screws in the rate of 5 / second or something around there. I am talking about swiss-machining. These pieces of equipment are very common in the US. They would produce a part like this in the range of 5 seconds / screw, not 30 seconds / screw and are generally made for lights-off machining (24 hr production). Screw machines could make these things maybe 500k in a 24 hour period (the ones sold overseas), I would expect a swiss machine to make around 15k in a 24 hour period.

      It sounds like the company making these are using standard lathes to reach this level of production or are using the machines only a few hours a day.

      Here is an example of a swiss-style machine https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    15. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe 5 seconds a part.

      Which, by the way, is about an hour and a half for 1000 screws.
      Apparently, local manufacturers are telling them that they can only do 1000 per day.

      only did a search based on proximity. Maybe someone with a secondary agenda or someone getting kickbacks as well?

      Personally I think it was either a) people not looking properly (i.e. laziness) or b) secondary agenda (i.e. they want to be able to say there were problems)

    16. Re:Bullshit by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Never had any luck with machining something that small. Cutting force for minimal chip being greater than the force to bend the stock or push it out of the chuck.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    17. Re:Bullshit by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      Horn, is that with a normal lath? I don't machine these personally but have a shop that machines screws for us that go down to 000-120 with a collet, biggest problem is catching them :D

      His competitors can cut down to a 0000 screws need to be cut using a swiss machine. It has a bushing that rolls with the part around the stock. Your cutter sits very close to the bushing so it is like you are cutting on a 1/2" piece of steel. The stock then moves instead of the cutter to maintain this (not always) these things often have 12+ axis of movement, they are crazy. They will often do hand-offs between different chucks so you can machine multiple features at the same time.

  19. And therefore: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw you, China!

  20. Maybe invest in US factories? by nycsubway · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe if the US doesn't have enough capacity, Apple could take some of the billions of dollars in cash, and ... invest it in US factories? I'm pretty sure if they invested that money in the US, then they'd be employing more US workers, who could... afford to buy an Apple device. I know it's cliche to suggest that investing in your home country actually benefits the country and your own company, but it's true.

    1. Re:Maybe invest in US factories? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Or don't single source the component to a mom and pop shop down the street.

      It's great to support the local guy but there's only so much capacity.

      Dual source it. Give 1000 pieces/day to the small shop and have another source that will sell you 30,000 at a time to use as safety stock. We're talking tiny screws. The 30k safety stock is almost no inventory $$ and takes up no storage space.

      Self inflicted wound.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:Maybe invest in US factories? by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      If they can only make 1k screws a day I bet they are not cheap screws, I would guess at least $0.5 each. That is $60/hr making 1000 parts in that time. If they had double shifts, multiple machines, etc it would be even more. If they are running this lights out and only getting 1000 screws per day they are doing something horribly wrong.

    3. Re:Maybe invest in US factories? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Maybe if the US doesn't have enough capacity, Apple could take some of the billions of dollars in cash, and ... invest it in US factories? I'm pretty sure if they invested that money in the US, then they'd be employing more US workers, who could... afford to buy an Apple device. I know it's cliche to suggest that investing in your home country actually benefits the country and your own company, but it's true.

      Yea, and maybe they could create a fund to do that. Maybe call it the "Advanced Manufacturing Fund".

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:Maybe invest in US factories? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Hmm dunno, that sounds like socialism. Why would they do that when they could order cheaper screws from China and add the savings to the idle vaults of people who already have silly amounts of money, while workers are pushed further into poverty, causing the hyper-rich to feel even even more like space royalty ruling over a penal colony? Isn't that the American way?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Maybe invest in US factories? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      They sold their mass production equipment in the 2000s when the mass market dried up and turned to high precision work and equipment. That's why the screws were taking so long to produce. The higher the precision the slower the production rate, in general. You can't blame the owners for selling the equipment. They wouldn't know it would be needed a decade later.

    6. Re:Maybe invest in US factories? by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      I don't blame them for selling the equipment. I blame apple's supplier for going to someone without the proper equipment and then screaming BAD USA PRODUCTION!

  21. Bring Manufacturing Back to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is why you need manufacturing in the USA.

    In Michigan, there are thousands of abandoned factories and thousands of unemployed people. Nobody cares about us. We are "flyover country" or the "rust belt".

    Once you stop making screws, it only takes a generation until you've forgotten how to make them, and you are hopelessly behind the technology curve when you want to start up again.

    If we hadn't exported our technology to China, these factories would be able to make the tiny screws, and the people here would be gainfully employed making the screws.

    Not everybody (probably less than 50% of the population) can go to the university and participate in the knowledge economy. They should be making screws and other manufactured goods. They should have a future too.

    Exporting our technology and weath and jobs to nations ruled by the corrupt and evil communist party has resulted in:
            massive concentration of wealth for the richest .01 %
            massive job lost for the bottom 50% of Americans
            addiction, incarceration, broken families, and fatherless children
            a new world order where we can't even make screws
            a gift of military technology to the Chinese

    You might not think a tiny screw matters, but when it comes to national defense and the technological arms race, you will soon understand that the free world made a huge mistake by gifting all the fruits of a free and open society to the Chinese communist regime.

    So instead of fighting for jobs here, the "super smart people" in the media are telling us that caring about your country and preserving your freedom and wealth and way of life is a bad thing. We are building up the government of china where there is no freedom and incessant nationalism, but any opposition to that is xenophobia.

    1. Re:Bring Manufacturing Back to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe is in the same boat.
      Just worse.
      Because we can't print dollars for nothing.
      Or use the dollar as a false excuse to sue abroad companies for big bucks.

    2. Re:Bring Manufacturing Back to the USA by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The real trick was what China went shopping for in the USA.
      A lot of the US factories got inspected by experts from China.
      All that generational US tech got packed up and shipped to China.
      The cost of the worker in the USA was too much.
      The same US machine in China with low power costs and low worker wages could still make China a profit.
      China selling US parts made on US production lines back to the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  22. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds more like an excuse than anything else. I don't think anybody has said they can't use Chinese screws, although personally i've found the quality of such screws pretty bad.

    Really, your only source of screws is some 20 person machine shop? If that was it, then this whole thing was just designed to fail.

    And funnily, “China is not just cheap. It’s a place where, because it’s an authoritarian government, you can marshal 100,000 people to work all night for you,” awesome. I guess it'll take a lot of time to go through that resource, but it's still completely evil, and most likely the actual reason.

  23. Crazy low production by Vanyle · · Score: 2

    They chose a really really bad shop, not using the proper equipment for screws. Any good screw machine (swiss machine) should be able to produce screws like crazy, cycle times should be in seconds. Single pass on the main spindle, parting cut then finish machining on secondary spindle. You should be able to run i'd guess 10 screws a minute unless it was something super crazy on one machine, 24-hours a day would be 14k screws / day on a single machine. Granted this would be done on a $150K+ machine, might be a little tough on a 20-man shop.

    1. Re:Crazy low production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or their willingness to commit to a volume that would make that worth it wasn't there.
      Perhaps they depend on being able to essentially strip mine small manufacturers in China that will fill small orders at a loss and go out of business when Apple changes their mind or what they want today - there's one born every minute. Maybe well equipped US shops got that way by not falling for those shenanigans.

    2. Re:Crazy low production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They chose a really really bad shop, not using the proper equipment for screws. Any good screw machine (swiss machine) should be able to produce screws like crazy, cycle times should be in seconds. Single pass on the main spindle, parting cut then finish machining on secondary spindle. You should be able to run i'd guess 10 screws a minute unless it was something super crazy on one machine, 24-hours a day would be 14k screws / day on a single machine. Granted this would be done on a $150K+ machine, might be a little tough on a 20-man shop.

      I've been in small shops around the 20 employee mark.

      Computerized machining seems to be the way they survive. A $150k machine wouldn't be out of place - I believe one of the shops I supported had a half million dollar machine.

    3. Re:Crazy low production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd believe that. Kind of a strip mining type business plan.

    4. Re:Crazy low production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT'S the problem! They were using american screw machines. Who can blame them though, everyone know America is the best place to get screwed...

    5. Re:Crazy low production by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Or they sold their mass production machines when the work dried up over a decade ago. It all went over to China. The shop went to high-precision work and they were trying to do the work with slower machines. It's not like you can order a new mass production machine and have it installed in a couple of days.

      Besides the screw was an example about all of the problems that they were having setting up a supply line in the US.

    6. Re:Crazy low production by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      Nah, there are plenty of swiss-style lathes in the US that can make these parts super fast and are available. They chose a bad source for this. The screw was what was in the title so that is what I focused on. Chances are if they can't source something this simple they have other issues as well.

    7. Re:Crazy low production by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Well, you better send you CV off to Apple and you can show them how to build they supply chain right then since you know all the answers.

    8. Re:Crazy low production by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      Really? You are a apple fan-boy aren't you? Or why are you getting upset at this?

    9. Re:Crazy low production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send your CV already.

  24. So supply chain problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This isn't news. It's exactly what Apple and others have been saying. It CAN be fixed but not quickly or without a ton of money and a dramatic increase in end unit pricing. Apple could probably eat it all and still turn a profit with current pricing but capitalism and investors won't allow that. Even if a company is making billions they're expected to make more every single quarter, no matter what.

  25. If you want electronics manufacturing to come here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats easy, repeal the DMCA & enact some IP laws that actually make sense.

  26. Re Screwing by MaSeKind · · Score: 1

    Yeah, at least show us the culprit.

    Let me guess, it's those silver screws. Worthless pieces of crap. Everybody know that once you screw black, you never go back

  27. Apple. by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would posit only that this shows that Apple are terrible at sourcing products, especially bespoke non-standard products of their own design.

    This tells you several things about: a) the practicality of their designs, b) their deliberate awkwardness to manufacture, c) their patent portfolio, d) their ability to "think outside the box".

    So you couldn't buy a custom-made screw. And you didn't know that in time for production. And that stymied however-many-million-dollars of product from going into production.

    And we're not talking some aircraft-grade, ultra-thin, super-duper-magical screw. But a screw to hold, say, a motherboard to a case, or a case together (but their Mac cases didn't have screws, did they?). You couldn't have just bought a bunch of M3/M4/M5 screws and drilled appropriate holes?

    This says everything you need to know about Apple, not what Texas can or can't produce. They'd rather create weird shit that serves no purpose that can't be fulfilled with a 1/10th of a cent screw that you can pick up anywhere, and pass that cost down to you, blaming American manufacturing when they own inability to design, source, plan and manufacture a simple fixing shows them up.

    1. Re:Apple. by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      I thought that Tim Cook was supposed to be some sort of supply-chain master?

    2. Re: Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is. That is why he uses China. Are you dense? He knows like most of us that American labor is a joke.

    3. Re:Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be specific, it means that that particular team at Apple (which probably wasn't their A-team) wasn't good at sourcing products.

      Their design team (not necessarily the manufacturing team) perhaps was used to conditions in China where sourcing weird screws has always been an easy thing to do. They didn't think twice about specifying that weird screw because it never caused problems before (I'm just guessing). (I'm not going to debate whether it was a good design decision or not - I am not qualified).

      The question is what lessons the company takes away? From the article, it is presumably that management will think it is harder to create things in the US as things that they found easy in China were a pain in the US. Perhaps it was a bad hires in the US, perhaps it is something more fundamental.

    4. Re:Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the US though. The standard M3/M4/M5 screws are metric and this very rare.

    5. Re:Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but he obviously doesn't know anything about screwing

    6. Re:Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the Mac Pro since 2014. Worst Apple buy of my life, by far. I have 4 MBPs of various generations and will probably buy another, but I’m back to PCs as my workstations since last year.

    7. Re:Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You couldn't have just bought a bunch of M3/M4/M5 screws and drilled appropriate holes?

      Considering the design of the current Mac Pro, probably not. They probably had severe limitations in all dimensions and were pushing the limits of what would still function while fitting in the available space. Which is ridiculous for a desktop machine, but the Mac Pro is a ridiculous machine.

    8. Re:Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...except that China supplied that screw with no issues.

    9. Re:Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. He's a fag, he can't even get it in the right hole.

    10. Re:Apple. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      He obviously is, otherwise how can he manage building products full of custom-made screws? Sure, he messed up this time but you never hear about screw shortages for all those other products that have some weird special snowflake Apple-only screw head. Most of other places could never handle it, which is why they find some common standard screw that they can just buy in bulk from dozens of suppliers and not worry about it.

  28. Austin is not the place by Jfetjunky · · Score: 2

    Austin is not the place for high quantity fabrication. Yes, there are some machine shops in town, but most of Austin is very similar to the South, in that there is much less manufacturing. Houston has more, but mostly to support oil operations.

    Every day here more industrial and garage type spaces get turned into crossfit gyms and breweries. (not that I'm particularly against either, just a point blank example of what is thriving here).

    Side story. Years ago I spotted an awesome vintage garage for sale/rent. I thought it might have been my chance to have a shop of my own. I talked with the owner. He essentially told me "You don't want to do that". The combination of high taxes and environmental restrictions were essentially why he shut it down in the first place. He flat out told me he was hoping for a trendy tenant. Bar/restaraunt/what have you.

  29. A plant is not an ecosystem by tsstahl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Manufacturing requires an ecosystem of other manufacturers for mutual support. A single widget machine is not technology; the manufacturing capacity and knowledge along with perpetuation of same _is_ technology.

    Back in the day when off shoring started, the argument was the grunt labor is going overseas, but all the knowledge work is staying here. Obviously stupid on the face, but people fell for it. Manufacturing problems are solved on the plant floor as they occur. Nobody waits for the 'knowledge' to show up from 12 time zones away.

    Heck, even the anecdote in the summary made the natural assumption that the place to get the screw was China, not Pennsylvania, or some other not Texas based US source--because that is where the mature ecosystem now thrives.

    Congratulations, America, you got what you paid for.

    Apple, you have the chance to among the first 'on-shorers' to stick with it to reap long term benefits, like your predecessors did 200 some odd quarters ago when they went the other way.

  30. "US'ians"? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I think the accepted term is "Americans".

    1. Re:"US'ians"? by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      I think the accepted term is "Americans".

      I think you'll find that the Americas contain no less that 56 countries and territories who are inhabited by 'Americans'. For US citizens to claim the term 'Americans' for themselves to the exclusion of all others is a bit like the French claming exclusive rights to on the term 'European' or the Chinese claiming exclusive rights to the term 'Asians' (which I would not put past them given what they have been up to in the S-China sea lately). The best you can do to monopolise the term 'American' is to call yourselves 'US-Americans'.

    2. Re:"US'ians"? by Megol · · Score: 1

      By tradition but not by logic. Would you for example say Europeans when referring exclusively to the French?

    3. Re:"US'ians"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dear Dimwit,

            We are called 'Americans' (by most of the world) because the name of the country is United States OF AMERICA. If has nothing to with 'excluding' other countries. If, for some reason, one wants a geographical name for people, normal people use the terms NORTH AMERICAN, CENTRAL AMERICAN, and SOUTH AMERICAN. Do you also object to the term 'South African'? Pretty sure there is more than one country in the southern part of African. Oh wait, normal people understand 'South African' to mean 'someone from the Republic of South Africa'. I guess idiots may try to use the term 'RSAians'.

    4. Re:"US'ians"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dumbshit, "Americans" has been the accepted term for US citizens for hundreds of years now. That isn't going to change because one internet fuckstick wants to be pragmatic about it. Go back to whatever gay ball Euro trash country you came from.

      MAGA! (Trump is an idiot, I like trolling low IQ fuckwits)

    5. Re: "US'ians"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No such thing as US'ians or USA'ians. That is ungrammatical. English uses 's for possession.
      If you want to talk about all people in the AmericaS, say America-siand. Americasians. Distinct from America Asians.

      Citizens of the United States of America are called Americans for short because the US of A is the only country to include the continent in the country's name.

      USians is bullshit.

    6. Re:"US'ians"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pragmatic

      Pedantic.

    7. Re:"US'ians"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most of us US citizens would prefer that you called us US-Americans or some—other name—rather than US'ians which is a grammatically incorrect mixing of an acronym and a suffix used for denoting geography. Your designation doesn't work in our language.

    8. Re:"US'ians"? by tbird20d · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that the Americas contain no less that 56 countries and territories who are inhabited by 'Americans'.

      Nope.

      I don't see any Canadians or Mexicans or Hondurans or Venezuelans or Brazilians (etc.) clamoring to be called Americans. The only country with the word "America" in it's name is the United States of America. It has been standard practice to call people from the USA "Americans" for a very long time. What you're pointing out is a recently made-up pedantic grievance that no one really cares about.

      When trying to communicate, it's better to use words the way most other people use them.

  31. Regular/Phillips Screws! by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 0

    There should be a law that requires all device manufacturers to use regular or Phillips screws.

    --
    http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    1. Re:Regular/Phillips Screws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There should be a law to shut your mouth. Torx forever...

    2. Re:Regular/Phillips Screws! by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      You mean crappy hex bolts that are easy enough to take out with a regular driver?

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
  32. Simple solution by CptLoRes · · Score: 2

    Apple just needs to be less Apple and use standard screws instead.

    1. Re:Simple solution by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as a standard screw in the tiny electronics market.

  33. Am I missing something? by pi_rules · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A 20 man shop producing 1,000 screws a day?

    Figure an average hourly wage of $20/hr that's $400 in labor per hour over an 8 hour shift that's $3200 cost in labor per day. At least. I'm skipping land leases, building lease/rent, material cost, etc.

    If you're kicking out 1000 screws and it takes you $3200 in labor that's $3.20 cents per screw.

    I"m either missing something, the article is full of crap, or this place was kicking out 8" long bolts made out of some really hardened steel with excellent QA looking for defects... and then Apple tried getting them to make tiny tiny screws?

    Nope, nothing makes sense.

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I"m either missing something,

      The machine shop is unlikely to devote their entire staff to making freaking screws for Apple. It's probably more like 1 employee, or a fraction of an employee. They're unwilling to scale up because making screws for a major international company isn't the core business of a machine shop, it's likely just something they agreed to do for some extra cash.

    2. Re:Am I missing something? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Headcount is there to show the size of the shop. Obviously they do other business....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bullshit story full of lies and excuses about why apple won't be making things in the usa to cover up the real reason. (money.)

      So of course it won't make sense. Heck its about hardware by people who have never even touched a screwdriver most likely.

    4. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow, I doubt all 20 people were working on one machine for screws. But that's not really the point.

      In the main article, they mention that the shop doesn't have the machines to mass produce the screws via stamping. They mill each screw out. The owner got rid of the mass-production stamping machines for slower - and probably programmable - milling machines as that is where the market headed.

    5. Re:Am I missing something? by Jfetjunky · · Score: 1

      Well, manufacturing goes like this: Pay through the nose per unit if you want it right now and custom. Or pay a bunch upfront for tooling and wait much longer, then get them very cheap per unit in high quantity. Also, you're assuming the shop allowed Apple to occupy their entire workload for these screws, which is unlikely. In fact, it's more likely Apple wasn't getting much volume simply BECAUSE the shop wouldn't dedicate much time to it, probably because it wasn't worth the money.

    6. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were artisanal screws.

    7. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 20 man shop producing 1,000 screws a day?

      More likely they produce a lot more screws than that and the 1,000 number is limited by them only having one machine that can manufacture custom screws that fits Apples specification.
      They could invest in more machines, but then they are screwed if Apple decides that it is cheaper to manufacture elsewhere before they've made back the cost of those machines.

      What they need is a smaller customer that wants 2,000 customized screws a day so that they can make a smaller investment without ending up in a crisis if the customer leaves.

  34. Supply chains are difficult by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Soooo if you don't have enough screws produced locally, you just order more from China... exactly what Apple did.

    When you have to do that often then it makes more sense to just assemble the product in China rather than blowing up your supply chain and incurring huge freight and logistics costs and hassles.

    That kind of basic part seems like it should be easy enough to predict need of ahead of time, and cheap enough that pre-ordering a rough amount of material you might need would not cost much.

    It's just an example of the sorts of difficulties that happen when you try to manufacture something physically far away from the bulk the supply chain. It's not just one component for one product - the screw is just an understandable example of the bigger problem. There are hundreds to thousands of components in the bill of materials for a typical computer and new products are being made all the time. These components are very often not made in the US because they have a high labor content so US firms aren't cost competitive on those parts. My day job is general manager of a small electronics assembly company. I deal with this every day. I don't think you even begin appreciate the problems with ordering stuff from halfway around the world for manufacturing.

    It seems like lessons learned will mean that Apple will have been more careful about what they can produce locally vs. what they still need to order from China in order to assemble computers in the U.S. I'm pretty sure that is still a big goal for them.

    Ordering from China isn't nearly as easy as you make it sound. I do this for a living. First off you immediately incur a 6-14 weeks of additional lead time (no they aren't going to ship it by airplane except in emergency - that costs a fortune) because it takes that long to make the product and send it on a boat across the ocean. So you end up stocking a lot of unnecessary inventory to guard against supply chain disruptions. Second, you have to have people working closely with your supplier in the foreign country or else you get serious quality and delivery problems. This adds a lot of cost and hassle. Yes there are plenty of Chinese suppliers who would think nothing of screwing even mighty Apple and Apple knows this. Third, you are grossly underestimating the advantage of having your engineers and supply chain people close to the suppliers. Problems happen and fixing them from half a world away is never easy. Fourth, when you cannot get components locally you incur a lot of currency risk. Fifth, a big part of the reason China produces so much of the world's electronics is because nearly the entire supply chain is nearby. This reduces costs tremendously.

    I could keep going. If it were economically practical to assemble electronics in the US (even ignoring the labor price disparity), companies would be doing it. US companies would love to be able to buy their stuff locally but it's just not economic. I've bid on jobs where the target sale price was less than my cost of materials because the supply chain in China for electronics is that advantageous. Getting the supply chain back to this side of the pond will take decades to happen.

    1. Re:Supply chains are difficult by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is bullshit and you know that. It's about SUPPLY CHAIN. Apple knows this. In fact supply chain issues have been the bane of Apple's exist for that past 40 fucking years! Apple knows about it. What Apple did not do was ensure that they had sufficient supply chain available here, which they could have easily done.

      This was Apple's fault. It's a known issue that is easily solvable.

    2. Re:Supply chains are difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your solution is what?
      Instead of using a factory that has all the machines and workers ready to go, Apple is to invest in the local supplier to set up the supply chain and end up with a single source for the component?

    3. Re:Supply chains are difficult by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. Manufacturing takes an ecosystem, it's almost impossible to do everything in house. Hell, Ford sub'd parts for the Model T. I have a friend who used to own several businesses, including a machine shop. As his clients moved their manufacturing overseas, his machining business dried up and he eventually had to shut it down.

      Revitalizing a manufacturing sector isn't trivial, one company, even Apple, can't do it overnight.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    4. Re:Supply chains are difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supply chains are so enormously complex I don't think anybody has any idea of the full scale. Take the tiny screw. Apple needs the screw. The machine shop needs labor, tooling, machines, and raw material. The tool makers need their own tooling, machines, and raw material. The machine maker needs tooling, raw material, their own machines. The miners need tools, machines, etc. Oh wait we gotta move this stuff around. Now we're involving ships and cars that need a ton of resources, equipment, specialized parts, etc etc. But hey all this screw making is dangerous, we need safety equipment. So now we need injection molds, plastics, heaters. But oh wait we need more machinery to make the molds. And raw materials. We need not only all these things, we need a workforce capable of doing these things.

      TL;DR: You can't control supply chain because you can't control who made the drill bit for the injection mold for the button on your parts delivery driver's sexy brown jump suit.

    5. Re:Supply chains are difficult by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      When you have to do that often then it makes more sense to just assemble the product in China rather than blowing up your supply chain and incurring huge freight and logistics costs and hassles.

      It costs less than $2,000 to import a 40-foot shipping container. When I ran the math in 2015, it was $1,300, making the shipping cost of a pair of men's cotton trousers from China to the dock at the US six cents.

      You know how we make clothes in China? Well, those clothes are made of cotton grown in Egypt or the United States, shipped to Indonesia for processing and spinning, shipped to the United States again for weaving, shipped to India for dying, shipped to China for manufacture into clothing, and then shipped to America for selling.

      It's cheaper and more-efficient to do that than to make American jeans from American cotton spun and dyed in America.

    6. Re:Supply chains are difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but its much easier and cheaper when the suppliers are an hour car ride away than a flight across the world.

    7. Re:Supply chains are difficult by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      This is bullshit and you know that.

      From the grandparent:

      Ordering from China isn't nearly as easy as you make it sound. I do this for a living.

      Repeat after me: "I don't know what I'm talking about, so I will listen to the guy who does"

  35. It's called the big picture. by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    It's not about Apple making products in the US. The point is for the supply chain to develop to support it, which in the end creates far more jobs than a single Apple plant that does final assembly.

  36. It's called "Supply Chain Logistics" by bobbied · · Score: 3, Funny

    It doesn't matter WHERE you build stuff, you have unique supply chain logistics to work out.

    What do you bet that if Apple has a need for screws in Austin and is willing to pay enough, some bright business person will set up a screw manufacturing business that's closer and sell what Apple needs? That's what supply and demand will do in a free market system. This means that IF you can pull manufacturing back into the USA, you will also pull the parts supply chain back to the USA as a secondary effect.

    So I see Apple's trouble with it's supply chain being a good thing. There are a lot of places in the USA where they used to make screws, but now don't as this moved off shore. Now there is a chance of puling those jobs back, shortening the logistics supply chain, lowering transportation costs and making inventory management less difficult. In the mean time, Apple just needs to manage their supply chain a bit better so they don't run out of parts.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:It's called "Supply Chain Logistics" by thomn8r · · Score: 2

      This means that IF you can pull manufacturing back into the USA, you will also pull the parts supply chain back to the USA as a secondary effect.

      So I see Apple's trouble with it's supply chain being a good thing. There are a lot of places in the USA where they used to make screws, but now don't as this moved off shore.

      They won't. This will be the reason they cite for keeping everything offshore. Like companies that lay off all the American employees, then claim they need H1-B's because they don't have enough locals.

    2. Re:It's called "Supply Chain Logistics" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, you are saying that Apple should bring back manufacturing to the US in order to build a supply chain rather than shop around and find a place that already does.But why should that really be the goal of Apple or any other company? It inevitably costs more without much benefit (except perhaps as a PR exercise). And you need to get more than one company to do it (Apple, big as it is, is not big enough by itself to tip the scales).

      If we want to bring back manufacturing to the US (it isn't necessarily obvious that it is needed - the unemployment rate is pretty low despite there not being "enough" manufacturing) then it has to be the government that steps up in some way in order to create the conditions that would convince Apple and other companies to do so. Maybe this is in the form of subsidies (i.e. tax breaks) either of the main company or of its suppliers or better quality training or something else entirely.

    3. Re:It's called "Supply Chain Logistics" by bobbied · · Score: 2

      They used to make things like screws in and around Rockford IL. There are a pile of unemployed folks with experience as machinists just sitting there waiting for work and I'll bet there are empty factory buildings just ready to go back into production too. IL may not be your state of choice for such an operation, but Madison WI is very close to Rockford and is generally open for business if you want to leave the tax pit of IL.

      So I believe they will, assuming that the total price for such US made parts is competitive. Of course, it's really hard to compete with the labor rates in the back woods of China, even with the transportation costs involved.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  37. Re:The lesson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's not actually bad just mostly retarded about economics and it comes across as bad because he doesn't care about the people hurt by his ignorance, the not caring makes you look bad, in politics you need to be fake caring not not caring.

  38. You can source parts oversees by scourfish · · Score: 1

    You are able to sourcing parts oversees and mark your product as "assembled" in the USA.

  39. Can't anyone just show the screw? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Neither link shows a picture of the actual screw. Don't tease me about it, just show us a damned picture to tell us why this screw is so important and hard to produce.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  40. Apple should mfg screws in house.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple should mfg screws in house, just like CPU, modems (future)....

  41. It's not about the specific screw by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Couldn't they have just ordered the custom screws air-shipped from a Chinese factory or redesigned the thing to use a more ordinary screw?

    Possibly but then they are adding cost to the product. You are missing the point. It isn't just ordering some specific screws. The screws are just an example of the broader problem. There are literally thousands of components with the same problems because the supply chain for them in the US has withered and it takes a long time to build it back up even when it is even possible. For high labor content work it's just not economic to make the stuff in a high wage country like the US. I do this for a living so I know. The problem is that the supply chain in China already has all this stuff figured out and engineers can easily get what they need locally over there.

    Believe me if it were easy and economic to build this stuff in the US, companies would be doing it. NOBODY who does this stuff for a living (and I do) wants to deal with ordering components from halfway around the world if they don't have to.

    I wonder what's so special about that particular screw. Is it a "tamper proof head" like Apple's 5-point "Torx" security screws to keep mere plebs from opening the hardware?

    Don't fixate on the screw. The screw is just an example of a problem they will face over and over again. The point is that the supply chain just isn't robust for electronics manufacturing in the US like it is in China. Fixing this problem will not be easy or quick.

  42. The Expected Result by fuzznutz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is what happens when you ship all your manufacturing overseas for 40 years and suddenly expect manufacturing to ramp up overnight after 40 years of neglect.

    1. Re:The Expected Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not sure this is anything more than Chinese propaganda. They've gotten the NY Times in their grips, I wouldn't be surprised if they've got Apple complaining for the same reason. It was 10 years ago, but I didn't have a problem getting custom shoulder bolts made in the US, though I'm not Apple, so a 3 week lead time wasn't a problem.

    2. Re:The Expected Result by Moof123 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      +1.
      The best and brightest would have to be completely foolish to go into manufacturing in the USA today. Similarly since most remaining manufacturing left behind is of niche nature, don't expect that the supply chain will all be here waiting for your order to show up.

      Apple in particular is a VERY demanding customer, and will pull shit like expecting tens of thousands of sample chips built to their oddball specification, for free, just to be considered for an eventual slot in their designs. Their vendors have to go WAAAAY out on a limb by pre-purchasing materials and equipment on the hope that they win. Fail to compete? Bankruptcy. Fail to win? Bankruptcy.

      One of the more obvious ones was the sapphire manufacturer that tooled up to be a phone glass supplier, and was driven out of business when they only got a fraction of the expected business. Many more cases of critically wounded companies abound without the same headlines.

      So I have no sympathy for Apple in particular when they don't have manufacturers lining up to produce some artisinal screw on demand.

    3. Re:The Expected Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. All thats left are the little mom&pop machine shops, and even for them screws&washers top the list of things uneconomical to make here.

    4. Re:The Expected Result by bjdevil66 · · Score: 2

      FTA: “In the U.S., you could have a meeting of tooling engineers and I’m not sure we could fill the room,” he said. “In China, you could fill multiple football fields.”

      But we have an ass-ton of college graduates. That's what matters...

    5. Re:The Expected Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh "artisanal screw"...damn hipsters ruin everything.

    6. Re:The Expected Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, but I cannot see the problem? One particular screw is hard to source? So change the case design to use a standard screw that already is in use and can be ordered in truckloads. It is not as if Apple really need to have special screws.

      But if they want to be so special, do like Henry Ford and get their own screw factory.

    7. Re:The Expected Result by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      One of the more obvious ones was the sapphire manufacturer that tooled up to be a phone glass supplier, and was driven out of business when they only got a fraction of the expected business. Many more cases of critically wounded companies abound without the same headlines.

      I was thinking the same thing. No way I or the owners of that screw company are going to get new machines on finance with the shit Apple pull.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    8. Re:The Expected Result by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One of the more obvious ones was the sapphire manufacturer that tooled up to be a phone glass supplier, and was driven out of business when they only got a fraction of the expected business.

      While I don't disagree with your overarching point, the way you describe it is not what happened. That sapphire manufacturer bankrupted itself by overpromising and underdelivering on a contract that they bet the company on. Simple as that. Apple not only upheld its end of the agreement with that manufacturer, it went above and beyond what was contractually required. It was only after months of missed deadlines and delays that Apple finally refused to fund the failed initiative any further, which ended up being a lose-lose for everyone involved, since the manufacturer went bankrupt and Apple only got back a small fraction of what they put in.

      More or less, Apple wanted sapphires that could be used for iPhone displays, presumably for the following year's iPhone. They went to the manufacturer and offered to front the manufacturer a large sum of money (for the capital expense involved with buying furnaces and other equipment) if the manufacturer agreed to ramp up production according to a rather aggressive timetable, with additional funding coming in stages as the manufacturer hit various milestones. Pretty standard stuff. As a nice bonus, there was the promise of a massive purchase order if the manufacturer succeeded in fully ramping up.

      After the manufacturer failed to produce just one sapphire boule to spec by the original deadline, Apple could have pulled out, but they didn't. Instead, the timetable was renegotiated and Apple agreed to fund the next stage of development. The manufacturer eventually produced a boule to spec, but then they couldn't hit the yield levels they had promised with the revised timetable. Once again, Apple could have pulled out, but they didn't. They negotiated a revised-revised timetable and funded the next stage of development, though there was apparently a rather stern warning this time (the manufacturer is quoted in bankruptcy court proceedings as claiming that an Apple exec told them it was "time to put on your big boy pants"). After the manufacturer failed to meet yield milestones according to the revised-revised timetable, Apple refused to fund it any further. There was no hope that production could ramp up in time for their uses, so they put the final nail in the coffin.

      At that point, the manufacturer was sunk. They had bet the company on receiving the purchase order so that they could repay the money that Apple had fronted them. Without the purchase order, they had no hope of repaying Apple, so the company went bankrupt and Apple ended up being the owner of a large building (which they turned into a data center) and a lot of sapphire furnaces that they didn't have a clue how to use. Again, it was a lose-lose for everyone involved, despite Apple going above and beyond what they had originally agreed to do. If the original timetable was too aggressive, the manufacturer could have simply said "no" and the whole situation could have been avoided, but instead they bet the company on something that they couldn't deliver.

      While Apple is a very demanding customer, and they do indeed make insane demands, the only ones obligated to accede to insane demands are the ones who agreed to fulfill those insane demands. No one is forcing companies to get into bed with Apple, and if yours is the only one in the world with the know-how to do what's being asked, you shouldn't agree to terms that you can't keep, and you certainly shouldn't bet the company on it. That's just bad business.

    9. Re:The Expected Result by gweihir · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when you ship all your manufacturing overseas for 40 years and suddenly expect manufacturing to ramp up overnight after 40 years of neglect.

      And that is the key problem. The west has not kept up and has gotten fat and lazy. A classical example of how the mighty have fallen. And sad to see, because the west was really far ahead and would just have to keep at it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:The Expected Result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of the West, simply the United States. I'm holding out hope for the EU, though.

  43. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure the screw factory is fully automated C&C... Otherwise you can't produce tens of thousands of screws a day. Even with Chinese work efficiency.

  44. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Believe it or not, labor costs are rarely the biggest factor.
    The issue is with a global supply chain is there are some things that some countries can just do better then what others can for a wide range of reasons.
    Now China has an infrastructure that is better designed at making screws then there is at the US. Getting the right form of metal, to the places that can manufacture them, who have enough customers to make such verity profitable to mass produce. So this screw is made for US based Apple, and also Korea based Samsung, and LG...

    For a company to manufacture such screws in America, they will need to find a place where there is a workforce ready to do such work, setup machinery and get a customer base for their products. American Manufacturing is good at making Big Things, Small things Asia seems to be better equip for.

    As we moved away from Industrial Economy to Technology. The demand for small item manufacturing came into play.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  45. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    I don't know that the employees of the various foxconn factories are required to live on site, but many of those factories are in the middle of bumfuck nowhere, and the people they hire are dirt poor even if they are not. The dorm environment solves those problems.

    I'm not sure that can work in the USA, although we have plenty of rural areas that might make a good site, and plenty of poor people that need the work.

  46. Blame the Feds for this by zferrini · · Score: 0

    I posted this is as a reply but thought the rest should get a chance to chime in. I "WAS" a manufacturing engineer starting in the 80's into the 90's. Before the Gov't taxed the companies so high that paying workers and paying taxes needed to find something that could make them competitive. Sadly, that meant moving that part of the business model out of the country. Enter NAFTA, this was the loophole that companies needed to move manufacturing out of the country without paying a huge fine. Once the plant was in Mexico, namely Juarez, they were free to move it overseas without a penalty. That one screw shows how much the US Gov't had a hand in destroying the livelihood of the workers in what they call the "Fly over States. And all of you wonder how Trump got elected, look only as far as the Federal Government. And you thought they were looking out for you, ha ha ha ha ha!

  47. So I guess you could say... by thomn8r · · Score: 1

    they are screwed

  48. Supply Chain by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

    This is a non-story. Thank you New York Times for your bullshit reporting.

    This is about supply chain. Standard for any business. Apple knows their supply chain requirements. They know what steps need to be taken in order for the supply chain to work in the US. The fact that Apple did not take those steps - and worse that NYT did not grill Apple about - shows a complete management failure on Apple's part.

    As mysidia pointed out:

    "The problem is not large volume screw production... its large volume custom screw production with very short notice given.
    Don't expect to go to a factory with a custom product design and expect to have a huge volume of them manufactured for reasonable cost without any lead time."

    This is easily fixed and a non-story.

    1. Re:Supply Chain by PPH · · Score: 1

      Don't expect to go to a factory with a custom product design and expect to have a huge volume of them manufactured for reasonable cost without any lead time.

      Or, you know, just order from China.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Supply Chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a non-story. Thank you New York Times for your bullshit reporting.

      This is about supply chain. Standard for any business. Apple knows their supply chain requirements. They know what steps need to be taken in order for the supply chain to work in the US. The fact that Apple did not take those steps - and worse that NYT did not grill Apple about - shows a complete management failure on Apple's part.

      As mysidia pointed out:

      "The problem is not large volume screw production... its large volume custom screw production with very short notice given.

      Don't expect to go to a factory with a custom product design and expect to have a huge volume of them manufactured for reasonable cost without any lead time."

      This is easily fixed and a non-story.

      They DID give them plenty of lead time, and the company explicitly said they could do it, then when it turns out they fell sharply short of what they promised, apple successfully followed their backup plan and ordered screws from china.

      Nothing bad happened, no bad management at all.

    3. Re:Supply Chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the last minute custom screws isn't a problem in the Far East. They can be extremely rapid in retooling and which the shear breadth of their product lines already even custom jobs might be slight tweaks of an existing line. That's what the US has lost. In the US suppliers seem content with here's what we offer, take it or leave it. Apple is happy to leave it.

  49. WTF only fifty screws a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA says a 20 person company can only make 1000 screws per day????

    WTF?

    Each person can only do 50 screws per day? Six screws per hour? Something is wrong here, they are fileing them by hand under microscopes?

    Once set up, a screw machine can make 50 screw per minute !

    1. Re:WTF only fifty screws a day? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      TFA says a 20 person company can only make 1000 screws per day????

      WTF?

      Each person can only do 50 screws per day? Six screws per hour? Something is wrong here, they are fileing them by hand under microscopes?

      Once set up, a screw machine can make 50 screw per minute !

      TFA also says they got rid of their machines for doing that sort of thing because there was no demand and got more precise machines for specialised jobs or whatever. If the business was there Im sure they'd be first in line to get a fucktonofscrew making machine and run it 24/7. I mean 28,000 screws is a lot but how much can you make of that one order?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:WTF only fifty screws a day? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Well, whatever happened, there's only one thing we know for certain: they got screwed.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:WTF only fifty screws a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They likely where making these screws in a CNC machine. 1000 screws is one every 30s in an 8 hour shift. That feels about right with tool changes and down time to load material. Probably too steps. Thread one end. Flip and mill pentalobe.

  50. The missing screws Tim Cook needs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw you motherfucker chi-communist!

  51. Uhmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't apple have ordered the screws from, say, 10 different companies instead of one? Sure it'll me more admin (10 companies vs 1) but it might have worked out...

  52. People need to RTFA by sbrown123 · · Score: 2

    So, this tiny screw problems is this:

    "20-employee machine shop that Apple’s manufacturing contractor was relying on could produce at most 1,000 screws a day."

    That sounds like a sourcing problem if a shop you try to go through can't produce more than 1K screws a day. That shop should have been producing a hundred times that per day. For 20 people that is 50 screws per day. For an eight hour work day that means, per employee, each screw took close to 10 minutes to make. Were they hand crafting these things?! At half the staff, figuring not everyone is actually producing screws, that is still 5 minutes per screw.

    1. Re:People need to RTFA by jasonshortt · · Score: 1

      I suspect the time to produce the screw wasn't the issue, but rather time to obtain material and/or set up the machine. Plus, if material was changed by Apple frequently, each change would trigger a new material order if not a stock material. Producing 1000 of these tiny screws is probably a very small amount of material, so material vendors probably aren't eager to do a rush job for small $$. I agree with the many posts that solve the issue by using a standard screw.

    2. Re:People need to RTFA by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It's not about head count it is about a company investing in a very expensive CNC machine.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:People need to RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That shop should have been producing a hundred times that per day.

      Machine shops are not mass-manufacturers. They're sort of a jack-of-all-trades in manufacturing and repair. Need a custom part made for your aging tractor? Call a machine shop. Need some small prototyping done for your mass produced product? Call a machine shop. Need some custom welding done to fix your production line? Call a machine shop.

      These are mostly small businesses, and they don't want to suddenly start specializing in creating screws. If they did that, they'd likely go out of business by over-investing in one thing.

      My guess is this company has a limited ability to make screws, and it's all taken up by Apple. Maybe they have 1 or 2 employees dedicated to that? Maybe even less? To ramp up would mean buying more machinery to do this task, not just simply assigning more employees.

      Why would a generalist business like a machine shop want to suddenly become ultra-specialized at making this one particular screw for Apple?

      Going to a local machine shop sounds like a last minute CYA move by someone at Apple that was told to do this near impossible task of moving manufacturing to the US, for a product designed to be made in China.

    4. Re:People need to RTFA by sinij · · Score: 1

      Were they hand crafting these things?!

      I don't think typical Apple consumer would accept anything other than hand-crafted organic and renewable screws in their iDevices.

    5. Re:People need to RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im beginning to figure out why apple products are so expensive.

  53. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Believe it or not, labor costs are rarely the biggest factor." - "IN CHINA." - Yeah, if you can locate in a country with slaves you're going to be all set on labor costs. Well, until they're all disappeared into secret labor camps.

  54. Security screw or proprietary head design? by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

    I'm left wondering what the chances are the screw was some proprietary "security" design that complicated the tooling and screw production.

    I would imagine that screw manufacturers have a lot of existing tooling for common heads at many sizes. My guess is they probably didn't have the time to scale up the tooling required for some proprietary head design, especially if the head itself changed dimensionally.

    It would be super ironic if "Apple can't build stuff here" was more or less directly tied to "Apple wants to make it impossible to fix your stuff".

  55. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by dryeo · · Score: 2

    I saw something on Chinese automotive factories. The price of labour is actually pretty high as all the workers have to be highly trained robot technicians. Seems lots of their factories are very modern.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  56. Summary is a bunk, maybe the whole thing. by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

    Having to order screws from China doesn't mean you can't put an Assembled in the USA emblem on the unit.

    Assembled in USA = Imported parts put together in the USA

    --
    brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
  57. The military-industrial complex laughs its ass off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess there will be no more tanks or bombers built in the USA anymore because you can't manufacture here. Oh wait....

    captcha: squads

  58. FTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “The skill here is just incredible,” Mr. Cook said at a conference in China in late 2017. Making Apple products requires state-of-the-art machines and lots of people who know how to run them, he said.

    “In the U.S., you could have a meeting of tooling engineers and I’m not sure we could fill the room,” he said. “In China, you could fill multiple football fields.”

    Wonder why that is? We gave them the keys to the future on a silver platter?

  59. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, and suddenly there's a demand for screw manufacturers in America, and suddenly a demand for robotics and machines to make them, and suddenly a demand for metals to make them from, and suddenly there's a demand for programmers, and food services, and clothing, and child daycare, and... Gee... It's almost like .. We're fixing all of the destruction Bush and Obama inflicted on America.

    Dare I say... We're making ourselves great, again?

  60. America Did Not Outsource Manufacturing by sycodon · · Score: 4, Informative

    America Outsourced:

    Pollution
    Low wages
    Poor working conditions
    Dangerous working conditions
    Pollution
    Government Subsidies.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:America Did Not Outsource Manufacturing by Dracos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We absolutely did outsource manufacturing.

      And in 15 years, China will be outsourcing all those things to Africa.

    2. Re:America Did Not Outsource Manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. I can not get a job because your ass outsourced the pollution and low pay to China and Mexico. I would rather work in the USA with unsafe polutted working conditions, than not work and sit around all day telling myself how great it is to not be working for high wages and a clean environment.

    3. Re:America Did Not Outsource Manufacturing by caseih · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that the American manufacturing sector is doing just fine, better than it ever was. See https://www.forbes.com/sites/t... . But the nature of manufacturing has changed over the years and involves fewer jobs before. And the things that are manufactured tend to not be consumer goods but big ticket items. For example agricultural equipment is still made in the US and exported all over the world. China imports this equipment. There are cottage industries in the US making all sorts of goods (with a lot of Chinese components). All told, American industry is quite healthy despite what some folk say loudly.

      As was said earlier, labor is not really a part of the equation when it comes to overseas outsourcing. It's the supply chain that draws companies to China. For example this company making pinball machines in China: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Attempts to start a trade war with china do nothing to help American industry. In fact it hurts it by cutting off the supply chain we need to make cool things here at home.

    4. Re: America Did Not Outsource Manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a sheep, we get it.

      You rather the govt control your life.

    5. Re:America Did Not Outsource Manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in next 15 years history will come full circle and Africa will be outsourcing all those things to America.

  61. Maybe if they used these kinds of screws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in drones, or fighters, or bombers, or cruise missiles, or guns... You'd have billions of these screws.

    1. Re:Maybe if they used these kinds of screws by PPH · · Score: 1

      But you could never export them from the USA. Because of ITAR.

      Can't let that screw technology fall into our adversaries hands.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  62. It's about having a compact supply chain by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Manufacturing in the US is sustainable and it doesn't have be for slave wages either.

    The US manufacturing sector is worth approximately $3 Trillion annually. By itself it would be one of the 6 largest economies in the world. The US is VERY good at manufacturing and anyone who tells you otherwise has no idea what they are talking about. But what people fail to understand is that we don't make labor intensive goods here. (like screws) We make capital intensive goods (like jet engines). There are some goods which there is no economic to make in the US because the labor content is simply too high to be competitive. Custom screws in large volumes likely fall into this category.

    Apple knows that. And those screws? They can get the material from China overnight.

    No they cannot. Not without blowing up their costs. Buying in the sorts of quantities Apple deals in will add weeks to months to the materials lead time and they are NOT going to put them on a plane unless it is an emergency. Doing that for something like screws could easily cost more in freight than the screws themselves cost. It also means they have to order larger quantities and stock extra inventory to guard against supply chain disruptions. Plus there is the manufacturing lead time to make the component. I buy terminals from Japanese manufacturers all the time (JST, Hirose, etc) and lead times from them are typically 14 weeks for anything but the most common components. A lot of Chinese makers are the same.

    Apple just doesn't know them because they lost connection with their own supply chain.

    Apple knows their supply chain just fine. That's not the point. The point of manufacturing in the US is precisely so you don't have your supply chain wrapping halfway around the globe. You don't want to have to buy everything from China, ship it halfway around the world and then do final assembly in a high labor cost country. The point is that there are a lot of products that people never think of that just aren't made in the US anymore for very sensible reasons. The US manufacturing sector is robust and thriving but not every product can be economically made here. Conversely there are some products we make here in the US that China would struggle to make because they haven't built up the supply chain for them yet.

  63. Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S.

    And they sure as heck don't want to support Trump in any way.

    We're to believe this all goes south due to a large number of tiny screws not available on short notice?

    How stupid do you think we are, Apple?

    1. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China logistic is far better then USA because all the factories are already there. This is a well known issue. USA factories can't afford to keep mfg capabilities on reserve, ie not producing stuff, so things you orders have a much longer delivery time since they have to be scheduled. It's also not easy for a us factory to ramp up or down their labor force as needed which also as to the issues. In comparison, in China, all the materials are there already and there are so many factories that is fairly easily to get orders out quickly. You could argue that they could order parts from China which many do in advance and assemble in the us but that's us assembled, not made. Most companies don't bother since there not enough advantage.

    2. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American factories can't keep up because Bush and Obama inflicted massive harm to our country, doing everything they could to rape American manufacturing, because their corporate overlords wanted screws to be $0.0001 cheaper.

      We elected the only man talking about it, and the only man who is actually trying to fix it.

    3. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Rhipf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China logistic is far better then USA because all the factories are already there. This is a well known issue. USA factories can't afford to keep mfg capabilities on reserve, ie not producing stuff, so things you orders have a much longer delivery time since they have to be scheduled. It's also not easy for a us factory to ramp up or down their labor force as needed which also as to the issues. In comparison, in China, all the materials are there already and there are so many factories that is fairly easily to get orders out quickly. You could argue that they could order parts from China which many do in advance and assemble in the us but that's us assembled, not made. Most companies don't bother since there not enough advantage.

      Apple wasn't marketing these Macs as "Made in America" any way. They were just labeling them as "Assembled in America" so ordering the screws from China and screwing them into cases in Texas wouldn't have affected the labeling at all.

    4. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > China logistic is far better then USA

      STFU, Ivan.

    5. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by zferrini · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ, We USED to be able to do exactly what the article above talks about before NAFTA in 1996. As a matter of fact we were 10 times better it all of it. I was a 20 year Electrical, Mechanical, Systems Engineer at the time that the Gov't decided for us that we should just let manufacturing go. What were you doing in 1996? After that your Glorious politicians decided that China was going to be a good partner in this.

    6. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by zferrini · · Score: 0

      Arent you the moron, you must be younger than I.

    7. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We elected the only man talking about it, and the only man who is actually trying to fix it."

      You are kidding right? Can you outline any "TRUMP" product not made in China?

    8. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you voted for trump- pretty stupid.

    9. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nafta isn't the problem though. Shipping some screws from Canada isn't a big deal, from China is for many reasons.

    10. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Rhipf · · Score: 1

      Not sure what a tirade about NAFTA has to do with my statement. I didn't say it is better that the screws come from China or that the US couldn't make the screws. All I was stating is that if something is sold as "Assembled in America" that buying parts from someplace other than America wouldn't change the labeling.

    11. Re: Apple doesn't WANT to make stuff in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid enough to not realize that 2012 was four years before Trump was elected.

  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. We're missing a bunch! by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    A 20 man shop producing 1,000 screws a day?

    Figure an average hourly wage of $20/hr that's $400 in labor per hour over an 8 hour shift that's $3200 cost in labor per day. At least. I'm skipping land leases, building lease/rent, material cost, etc.

    If you're kicking out 1000 screws and it takes you $3200 in labor that's $3.20 cents per screw.

    I"m either missing something, the article is full of crap, or this place was kicking out 8" long bolts made out of some really hardened steel with excellent QA looking for defects... and then Apple tried getting them to make tiny tiny screws?

    Nope, nothing makes sense.

    My thoughts exactly. A single screw-making line ought to pump out 1,000 screws an hour- or more- and they should have several of these machines! Apple chose a shop that wasn't up to the task, and the shop took a job from apple that they weren't competent to execute.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:We're missing a bunch! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      A single screw-making line ought to pump out 1,000 screws an hour- or more- and they should have several of these machines!

      Why do you think this? They probably have one CNC machine that can do this and expanding that will cost them close to six figures... and why would they make this investment unless they have a contract to justify it? These are all solvable problems but obviously Apple has been spoiled by not having to do any planning in China.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:We're missing a bunch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, I'm sure that Apple didn't intentionally select a shop that couldn't deliver the goods in order to support their propaganda regarding the impossibility of returning the bulk of their manufacturing to the USA. They would NEVER do anything that! NEVER!!!

  66. Anti-tariff propaganda by fortythirteen · · Score: 2

    The only think this highlights is that Apple hasn't gotten their North America supply chains set up. If they need a certain size screw there's somebody in the western hemisphere willing to make it, they just have to give them the time to ramp up for demand. The fact that we've gutted our own manufacturing industry isn't a sign of the hyperbolic statement that an iPhone never could be build here.

  67. MOD PARENT UP by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Believe it or not, labor costs are rarely the biggest factor.

    It always surprises me how many people have a hard time grasping this simple fact. It is especially true when we are talking about something like a screw that is produced in batches that reach - at least - into the range of 100s of pieces per hour. Nobody is spending a significant amount of time per unit on this; not in design, not in manufacturing, not in QC. It is all automated. Often these end up being produced overseas not because the cost savings is significant but because the buyers didn't bother looking for a supplier in this country and potential manufacturers in this country didn't know there was a demand for this particular component. In the case of this particular screw, regulations are not a huge impact either (in comparison to say screws for medical, military, or space applications).

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by rjstanford · · Score: 2

      They're the same people who don't understand that increasing the minimum wage of someone making 100 hamburgers an hour by $1 won't increase the cost of each hamburger by $1.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re: MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mcdâ(TM)s where i am raised the prices significantly more than 1c per meal. it was closer to 50c more for a meal.

    3. Re: MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was due to "mcdâ(TM)" wanting an excuse to increase their profits.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      increasing the minimum wage of someone making 100 hamburgers an hour by $1

      What about doubling the minimum wage from $7.80 or so to $15?

      100 burgers an hour is more than one a minute. I've been in McD's. During rush times you might hit that number. During the rest of the day you're doing a lot fewer. Plus, it's not just one person involved in making those burgers. There's at least four people in a store, sometimes more.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP by q_e_t · · Score: 1
      The wage is maybe 1/4 of the cost of producing the burger, as there are the costs of heating and lighting the restaurant, rent and franchising fees, and ingredients and the energy needed to cook them. So doubling the wage from $7.80 to $15 for 100 burgers an hour probably increases the cost of each burger by $0.15.

      During the rest of the day you're doing a lot fewer

      And they have fewer people on duty as it's quieter. The thing that kills is the fixed costs during quiet periods unless you are selling enough during the busy periods.

    6. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? You're saying that the 3rd highest corporate tax rate in the world had no impact? You're saying that environmental regulations had no impact on a cadmium plated screw? Nope, none at all. And surely, there's no impact from Chinese dumping steel and destroying the western steel industry. That couldn't have had an impact. It's just that the Chinese are magically better at making screws.

    7. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      So doubling the wage from $7.80 to $15 for 100 burgers an hour probably increases the cost of each burger by $0.15.

      Then doubling the minimum wage for 10 an hour would increase the cost by $1.50. That's for every burger, even the ones that are on the current $1 menu. Since the true average rate is somewhere between the two numbers, the cost, and thus price, increase will be somewhere in between the two.

      Or there will be fewer people employed.

      And they have fewer people on duty as it's quieter.

      The times I've counted at least four is during the quiet hours. I also doubt they have too many employees who come to work for one hour each twice or three times a day.

    8. Re: MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the gross revenue percentage of income spent on labor in a fast food restaurant?
      Food costs are generally about 40% in a restaurant.
      Rent, utilities, etc is the next highest cost. Call it 25%.
      Another 10% in franchisee fees and you are looking at about twenty five percent left
      Before paying accounting costs, training materials, credit card fees. Pretend that takes only five percent, including lease fees on equipment (ha!).

      So a well run restaurant is paying under twenty percent of revenue as labor costs. McDonalds grills do twelve burgers at a time, two minutes to cook, thirty seconds to reload...squeegee off grill once an hour, each worker can produce about 300 burgers, or 150 big macs an hour. Half of the kitchen workers are dressing the burger and under a quarter of staff is handling the register, fries, etc. So call it 60 big macs per worker. Big macs are what, $5?
      Each fast food worker is generating $300/hr in revenue during peak hours. So at a $10/hr labor represents about 3% of revenue costs. Based on that math, a well run shop could afford to pay $70/hr at rush hour and still break even. Off rush hour, labor is a tinier percentage of capital costs compared to location rent and has even less impact on national inflation if wages are raised.

    9. Re:MOD PARENT UP by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Then doubling the minimum wage for 10 an hour would increase the cost by $1.50.

      That's not how the economics of a restaurant work, so that's nonsense given the overall way that a restaurant works.

      At $8 an hour, and assuming the ingredients and fixed costs average out at three times this, then the cost to make a burger when 100 an hour are being produced, assuming that it takes 1/100 of a person's effort is 8*4/100, or $0.32. It sells for $1. At $16 wage it costs $0.40.

      When the business is 10 per hour (which is really, really bad) then at $8 an wages the cost is now $8+$8+$8+$8/10 (ingredients cost less if you are making 1/10th as many), so the cost per burger is $2.48. At $16 an hour wage it's $16+$8+$8+$8/10, so the cost per burger is $3.28. The difference in cost is not $1.50 but $0.80

      Now on the face of it if you are selling at $1 then you are losing at $8/hour anyway. But if you don't have the restaurant open often enough (and enough depends on the type of establishment) people won't come during busy hours. So you end up cross sudsidising the quiet times with the busy ones.

      So at $8 per hour then each busy hour generates 100*(1-0.32) in profit, or $68. Each $1 burger during the quiet time at $8 an hour wage loses $1.48, but the total lost is only $14.80. So there is still $53.20 profit assuming equal amounts of busy and quiet times.

      At $16 an hour wage the profit from busy times is 100*(1-0.40) or $60. The total loss in the quiet period is $22.80, and total profit is $37.20. Profit is reduced, but there's no increase in burger cost here.

      If you increased the burger cost by $0.15 (my original estimate) then profit would be $53.70. Actually a little more than $1 burgers and $8 wage, assuming the same numbers of burgers are sold.

      Obviously the numbers are nominal, but hopefully you get the principle involved. And this is assuming the same staffing at all times.

  68. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For want of a screw the computer was lost.
    For want of a computer the contract was lost.
    For want of a contract the worker was lost.
    For want of a worker the taxes was lost.
    For want of the taxes the infrastructure was lost.
    For want of the infrastructure the country was lost.
    And all for the want of a miniature screw.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  69. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is correct. Americans commonly have a mental picture of illiterate workers toiling on dirt floors making "cheap Chinese goods". That is not modern Chinese manufacturing and the preconception is one of our big blind spots.

    Here's an example.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    This company makes beautiful multi-color silk-screened multi-layer through-hole plated PCBs for cheaper than I can buy bare copper plate board to etch them myself.

    When I want to go to production I can have the boards shipped directly to an assembler there and I get finished machine assembled, soldered, and tested boards for less than the cost of shipping everything here and assembling it myself.

  70. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    American Manufacturing is good at making Big Things, Small things Asia seems to be better equip for.

    Is this supposed to be a penis joke?

  71. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Just wait until Amazon launches their Amazon Gated Community! Coming soon to a state near you!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  72. I own a small CNC machine shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send me a few screws and a drawing and I'll copy them. I could be the first person to make an American knockoff of a Chinese product that isn't food. The real issue here is that Apple just doesn't want to pay a reasonable price, like more than $0.0004 each. They have plenty of money and if they really gave a shit about slapping the American label on it they would try harder. There is nothing special about Chinese manufacturing.

    1. Re:I own a small CNC machine shop by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      And how many per day can you produce in that shop?

      How long would you take to ramp up production to that level starting from receiveing blueprints?

      --
      bickerdyke
  73. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, Because Apple wasn't willing to find a supplier for screws in the US. Seems like they could have gone to China and bought a screw making machine of their own to bring back to the US. If China is the place to buy small screws its likely someone in China is selling a screw making machine.

  74. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by dryeo · · Score: 0

    Yea, I've watched a few YouTube videos on Chinese manufacture as well as things like logging and bridge building. The level of automation and specialized machinery is pretty amazing. It also makes catching up to them look pretty hopeless.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  75. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    $2.15/hr was the 2003 rate. Chinese workers made $3.20/hr in 2006, and a fair bit more now, plus government-provided social insurances.

    Besides that, the Chinese are just better manufacturers due to accumulated factors of production. It's more-efficient for regions to specialize and trade.

  76. The wonderful world fo slashdot . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't decide if this thread reads like a Rand novel, an OZ book, or like the wonderland books (unintelligible nonsense).

    So, we lament our loss of freedoms, economic choices, environmental friendly options, open source Blah Blah Blah . . . the first voted-up post is suggesting it would be great if we forced private businesses to standardize things that really don't add to the consumer experience at all, and will be a slippery slope for bezels, notches and everything else that people want a choice in.

    Page down further we get the "apple stuff is expensive" argument, then the "bring back manufacturing" -> WHY??? Apple has done the most worldwide to do more than pay lip service to improving living conditions for factory workers in China. I can't believe the number of people every day that I see "giving it an Ole'" with the "good enough" work ethic. That's not how I was raised, and we see the best quality out of Japan and very good quality at high output from China . . . so why try to bring that stuff back?

    Of all of the people in my family with full-time jobs, I'm the only one that makes above the poverty level -- I don't see what underpaying more Americans is going to do for this.

    Are you just all having a case of the mondays or something???

  77. In other words: by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    They were screwed.

    --
    bickerdyke
  78. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can say you are the first guy that dunked fifty times in a single game on Lebron. Doesn't mean it is true.

    As for the topic, Apple could have bought a few bags of five thousand screws each from China if they had actually sold more than a thousand Mac pros, much less per day.

  79. Type of screws? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    As a Canadian, I know all too well that living next door to the U.S.A. makes it harder to find metric screws.

    Are Apple using metric or imperial screws in their products? If they're using metric screws it could explain their difficulty finding american screw manufacturers who could make metric screws on short notice and in small batches?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  80. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if your product were real and popular, we could all buy a second run sourced version of it cheaper off Alibaba.

    Chinese manufacturers do not protect American designs.

  81. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 2

    It's not hopeless, it's just a matter of priorities.

  82. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, labor costs are rarely the biggest factor.
    The issue is with a global supply chain is there are some things that some countries can just do better then what others can for a wide range of reasons.

    But if those reasons include not caring for labour rights or labor safety, environmental standards or democracy at large (which usually means that your cheap prices may also be based on corruption or other criminal activities) then you might consider that "cheaper" does not equal "better at".

    --
    bickerdyke
  83. Hey Grandpa! Tell us the goldbricker story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow this story is some solid nonsense. Apply couldn't find a local supplier for their Just-In-Time manufacturing process? Or some Apple manager didn't want to have a bunch of spare inventory at some factory, so they dragged their feet and put their hands in the air and said "What can we do? Oh me oh my!" Who knew operating a factory was so hard?

  84. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    To my knowledge, that is explicitly forbidden in the US since its misuse was part of what became known as "Truck System".

    Google already tried to build housing for their employees to help the housing crisis in the bay area.

    --
    bickerdyke
  85. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    Or because screws will be hard to find, device makers will switch to glue, and will create products of lower quality and less competitive to their foreign counterparts.
    If you are not selling to the rest of the world, selling to one customer is very risky, especially Apple. There are many cases of big companies getting seriously burned with making custom components for Apple.

    The biggest problem with the economy isn't business needing more money, but more customers. Even if Apple is willing to spend 10x for the screws, chances are not too many companies will jump on the bandwagon to start up such a business, because of the risk, because they woudn't have enough customers.

    The only game changer would be if there is some advancement in mass production, that will allow a company to mass produce and item and change its specs on a whim. Currently general use robotics are not good for mass production, they can the custom requirements but not sell 100,000 units in a week after the specs were given. Then the next week produce a different product.

    As stated before the US economy is good with Big things, because big things have less tolerances, so we can build far more generic parts, and build a lot of them. We sell these big parts to a lot of customers.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  86. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And everybody was screwed.

  87. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot, where obvious truths are modded down and the poster flamed by a bunch of panty-waste, communist trash. I see it was your turn to get this maltreatment.

  88. Apple already assembles some things in US by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Apple already has many, many people working closely with China as far as suppliers of everything goes. They already have a shipping pipeline so I seriously doubt for Apple it's going to take 6-14 weeks to get parts... I'm sure they would of course have some buffer of supplies, but Apple can more than afford to build up a base of supply on hand.

    The real surprise to me is that Apple ever ran into this problem to begin with, as one thing they know how to deal with really well is supply chain issues. That's why I don't think it will be much of an issue going forward because the problem they had in the past was an aberration compared to Apple's usually very apt handling of supply chain management.

    It's not like everything has to come from China - Apple spend $60 billion last year American suppliers... No reason that cannot grow, as long as Apple is willing to let some component costs raise - which I'm sure they are for a Mac Pro.

    I could keep going. If it were economically practical to assemble electronics in the US (even ignoring the labor price disparity), companies would be doing it.

    Apple does exactly that with the old Mac Pro, and presumably the new one.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  89. Just an excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must be an excuse. In my little Colorado goober-town, just a bit north of Texas, we've got a manufacturing site that cranks out 25k *custom* screws per week for the medical industry. Every screw is different. If they're all the same it would go even faster. This little shop looks like the Terminator robot factory, its nearly all automated. Apple just didn't bother to look around.

  90. Screw factories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard to go to war without screw factories.
    You can, it will just be short.
    That is how the Union won over the South

    1. Re:Screw factories by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You're saying the south got screwed?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  91. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Hasaf · · Score: 1

    For a company to manufacture such screws in America, they will need to find a place where there is a workforce ready to do such work, setup machinery and get a customer base for their products. American Manufacturing is good at making Big Things, Small things Asia seems to be better equip for.

    As we moved away from Industrial Economy to Technology. The demand for small item manufacturing came into play.

    And for that to happen, these companies, the ones that make the boring parts, like screws, need to have faith that they will actually have customers. This means long term relationships that are built on trust. In the Baby Boom generation of managers, we haven't seen that. What we have seen is a short term version of the shareholder value principle. As a nation, we need to move past this narrow understanding of the role of the corporation and build lasting relationships.

  92. Expected outcome? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    You're saying when the US spends 2 generations decimating its manufacturing industry and offshoring everything, that there isn't agility or capacity in the small amount of on-shore fabrication that's left?

    I for one am shocked. SHOCKED. Next up, I'll be shocked to hear that a retired football player who hasn't exercised in 20 years can't run 100 yards in less than 25 seconds.

  93. Apple is being stupid by byteherder · · Score: 1

    Apple could order a million of those tiny iPhone screws and it wouldn't take up more than a shelf in space. It could dual source them so it never runs out. One manufacturer in the US and one in China.

    This is an easy solvable problem in supply chain management, something that you think Apple would be good at after 40+ years in business. That what happens when you outsource everything. It seems they outsource their business intelligence too. Now their brain-dead management can't figure it out.

  94. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ranton · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, where obvious truths are modded down and the poster flamed by a bunch of panty-waste, communist trash. I see it was your turn to get this maltreatment.

    Everything he said up until the "fixing all of the destruction Bush and Obama inflicted on America" part was insightful, but then it took a turn for the worst. The post is correctly labeled as a Troll.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  95. Of _course_ the Chinese produce more screws! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    That's why there are so many Chinese people!!!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  96. Design Engineering 101 by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Second and third source all your components where possible!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  97. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know that the employees of the various foxconn factories are required to live on site

    They are not. Some factories still have dormitories, but most workers don't live in them, and those that do usually transition to outside housing when they can afford to.

    many of those factories are in the middle of bumfuck nowhere

    Foxconn's biggest factories are in Shenzhen, an enormous metropolis of 20 million people and one of the fastest growing cities in the world.

  98. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're ignorant comments at the end hid an insightful post in the beginning.

    For decades our economy (and environment) benefited from moving entire sectors of the manufacturing industry overseas. The USA has remained a manufacturing giant overall (in 2005 China was 20% of global manufacturing while USA was 18%) but this article illustrates the USA lost key capabilities in many sectors of manufacturing. This is not necessarily a bad thing since we gain significantly from our partnership with developing countries, but it is certainly a concern we should address.

    About 10 years ago, as the economy was recovering from the financial crisis, manufacturing jobs starting "reshoring" back to the US. We went from 11.4 million manufacturing jobs in 2010 to 12.4 million jobs in 2016, and is now at about 12.8 million. The trend line for the past 8 years is pretty constant except for a bad year in 2016.

    Unfortunately now we have a President who cares more about his talking points than actual progress. Creating artificial reasons to reshore manufacturing (like the trade war) instead of real market-based reasons only damages our economy overall while other developed economies take advantage of our foolishness. Being economically inefficient on purpose is not a great strategy.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  99. Way to go Apple by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Always finding ways to screw things up: or in this case uhm... failing to find enough screws locally to screw things up adequately?

  100. That's how hard Apple works to prevent repairs by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    I didn't see this magical screw so I may be wrong here, but I would bet that I'm right: There is a cheap, common, standard screw which is almost like the one that caused the bottleneck. The design of the MacPro would have been just as good... except that somewhere in my apartment I already have a screwdriver which could have removed the screw. And that kind of thing is what Apple worked so hard to prevent. They needed some crazy pagan symbol in the head of the screw so that only Apple genius-priests could turn it. So if you're wondering why your MacPro cost you $3000, here's a part of the story.

  101. Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tests of new versions of the computer were hamstrung because a 20-employee machine shop that Apple's manufacturing contractor was relying on could produce at most 1,000 screws a day.

    What the fuck does this have to do with manufacturing in America? Is OP suggesting that 20-employee shops aren't possible in China? The problem is the idiot who hired a supplier without verifying that they could realistically supply the volume required. And nothing forced Apple to buy the screws from China. They could have ordered them from any capable shop. This smells like a staged "problem."

  102. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has Apple never heard of vertical integration? If you're one of the world's biggest companies with mountains of spare cash, and you're being held back by a tiny screw, you spin up a screw manufacturing subsidiary, Apple Fasteners Inc., and solve your problem yourself.

    Apple has this weird tantalizing hesitation with vertical integration. They kind of want to start to make some video content, but not really, so they plan to make a few hipster shows, but not really. They kind of want to make some of their own chips, and they do for smaller devices but not for the Mac, but they kind of do with the new T2 chips. It's part of the wishy-washy Tim Cook Apple that brings you headphone ports on Macs but not phones, Lightning ports on one device and USB-C on another, etc. Apple needs a CEO with the balls to make capital expenditures and build himself whatever is missing from the supply chain outside China.

  103. Why Texas? by njhunter · · Score: 1

    The corporate environment is very friendly in Texas but the manufacturing environment is lacking, as compared with Michigan. Now Michigan has lost a lot of manufacturing to China but I can only imagine there's still more in MI than TX.

  104. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure the screw factory is fully automated C&C... Otherwise you can't produce tens of thousands of screws a day. Even with Chinese work efficiency.

    They might if it's a military part... It was interesting to hear about the small details, which went into the making of the engine for the Abrams tank when it was getting refurbished from the theater.

  105. I'm of two minds about this by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    - I think this attitude that everything must be "made in America" is ridiculously outdated. Economies are global now; deal with it. But when a country competes unfairly - which China apparently does, on a regular basis - come down hard on that.

    - I don't like the explanation that "Chinese workers will work for little money and extremely long hours". We shouldn't be willing to accept horrible work conditions just because we want our toys and it isn't our children (or adults) who are basically slaves in all but name. If the stuff we want requires that other people suffer, that's a problem that needs to be handled at OUR end.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I'm of two minds about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, if not "Made in America", then how about "Assembled in the USA, with no parts made in China"?

  106. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I admit, I laughed in real life. So true, so many clueless missing the point.

  107. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    For how many? There are still low volume shops that do the exact same thing in the USA. Yes it costs more, but if you want 100 the Chinese are unlikely to return your emails.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  108. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    This company makes beautiful multi-color silk-screened multi-layer through-hole plated PCBs for cheaper than I can buy bare copper plate board to etch them myself.

    Of course they can. They already have the machinery in place, and they buy the materials in bulk. They also sell the product in bulk.

    YOU have to buy from a distributor in small quantities and make small production runs. Your costs per board are always going to be higher, even when you forget to include your own time and effort.

    That is not a quality based on where they are, except for the costs they can avoid by not having US environmental and employment regulations to comply with.

  109. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until some enterprising young go-getter in America starts making screws... You understand how this works, right?

    It's like your rabid hatred for America, probably coupled with crippling white guilt that demands artificial failure, might just be irrational, destructive, and fucking retarded..

  110. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's demonstrably and factually accurate.

    I voted for both of those assholes. I was part of the problem, but at least I'm not stupid enough to pretend like that's not what happened. They absolutely raped American manufacturing and shipped it to Mexico and China, because they were owned by corporate lobbies.

    How can you look at the empty shell of American manufacturing now and not come to this realization? You think it magically happened with zero relationship to one-sided trade deals and government-picked offshore contracts?

  111. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you just make a dick size joke?

  112. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm happy to be on the other side of an argument with someone who doesn't understand the difference between "your" and "you're".

    You can't even grasp basic syntactic rules 3rd grade children have mastered... I don't think you're capable of higher concepts that actually affect the lives of others.

  113. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know that the employees of the various foxconn factories are required to live on site, but many of those factories are in the middle of bumfuck nowhere, and the people they hire are dirt poor even if they are not. The dorm environment solves those problems.

    I'm not sure that can work in the USA, although we have plenty of rural areas that might make a good site, and plenty of poor people that need the work.

    They're living in the rural areas because they want their freedom. They don't want dorm condition with rules about things like tobacco and guns.

  114. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have actually had several designs produced by this company. The quality is good for the price! I could nit-pick about cosmetic items such as scratches in the solder mask that were not touched up, etc. but the important stuff (electrical spec, mechanical issues such as PCB flatness) were all good. In fact, the quality was better than some higher priced "budget" PCB services I have used.

  115. Machine Shops Are Very Common In America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > But when Apple began making the $3,000 computer in Austin, Tex., it struggled to find enough screws,

    I used to work at a company that ran machine shops. I live in rural Ohio and can think of over a dozen companies near me that specialize in machining a lot of parts, especially screws and bolts. The reasoning that the USA can't produce these parts is bull shit. An old Acme bar machine can produce thousands of screws an hour. 1 person runs 2 machines at a time... This isn't rocket science, it's just political bull shit.

  116. EMS jobs will go to Vietnam, not USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The higher end component manufacturing is done in high wage nations, like Japan. The assembly is done in low wage places. Unfortunately, for China, Vietnam is next door, has lower wages, and now a decent sized EMS business. In 2014, Samsung invested $3 billion in a cell phone factory in Vietnam. The suppliers are already in Vietnam. They just have to make a little more extra stuff.

  117. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes it costs more, but if you want 100 the Chinese are unlikely to return your emails.

    This is incorrect. I've ordered 500 boards from them in a single run before. The shipping costs more because its too heavy for e-packet delivery, but I wanted it via DHL for faster service anyway.

    I've yet to find a US based fab shop that can ship an unmasked single layer board for the price of a nice board from JLC.

    That's not the only gap. When I'm working on a piece of kit at 2:00 a.m. I don't want to have to call for a quote, email a gerber file, and wait for a salesperson. This is 2019. Online quoting and ordering should be a thing.

  118. Sounds to me like it's Apple's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't do their due diligence when selecting the shop. They didn't check to make sure the shop could HANDLE the capacity they required.
    So, in the end, this was Apple cherry-picking a supplier to set them up for failure.

  119. Re: Herrow China Stooge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China money and power make right. Stop making excuses for that shithole country! They POISON baby formula with plastics to make money for fucks sake!!

  120. Adam Smith is pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1000 screws per day, from a factory with 20 employees? Someone needs to read On the Wealth of Nations. :P

  121. So use screws that you can get here ... or invest what you need to to get them made here, you are freakin' Apple, I think you have the money.

    Charge your trendoid users a "special screw" fee, if you have to.

  122. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have said. . .
    For want of the taxes The Wall was lost.
    For want of the The Wall the country was lost. . .

  123. THIS is why things are made in China! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    “China is not just cheap. It’s a place where, because it’s an authoritarian government, you can marshal 100,000 people to work all night for you,”

  124. don't buy it by hdyoung · · Score: 1

    I actually know something about this, and I'm going to call at least a little bit of bs. What? A 20-man machine shop struggling to make 1000 screws per day? That's 50 screws per person, which boils down to 7-8 per hour. Even if you allow for 1 person on the team as a secretary, and 1 person to do QC, it still winds up in that ballpark.

    10 minutes per screw. For a precision screw with all-machined features, this means that a crew of 18 machinists were making them manually. By hand, with very little automation.

    I don't get it. Just two or three automated cnc machining stations should be able to crank these things at a much higher clip. One cnc lathe to do the basic geometry and the threads followed by a cut-off operation. Then they need to be manually moved into another fixture for the cutting of the head features, again by cnc and in bulk. At the end, bulk operations like plating, annealing or surface finishing, if the specs call for it.

    This isn't specialized stuff. This sort of semi-robotic CNC station exists in virtually any mid- or large- sized machining company and there are thousands of them in the US. Two or three days of process development, purchase a lot of the stock material and boom, ready to go. I'd make a fairly large bet that the decision was price-driven and not availability. The same crew of 20 machinists in China cost 1/4 as much. Factor in shipping and the product is probably half the price overall. Don't claim an availability problem unless it's real please. Just say "we went with China cause they're cheaper" and move on. We're capitalists. We get it.

  125. Wait what? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Apple fails to plan the logistics of manufacturing, so calls on their Chinese partners for help to avoid failure.

    That's what I get from that story. They've spent so long outsourcing manufacturing, they've forgotten how to do it.

  126. Damm, can't pick the right joke. by linear+a · · Score: 1

    So many jokes possible for this topic, I can't pick one...

  127. If they used standard components... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they used modular standard components instead of custom unserviceable single-use parts, then they would have no problem sourcing or even making them in north america.

    Single-run single-use is what China does best.

  128. The Apple Discussion by Rastl · · Score: 1

    Director: "We want to produce these in China but we're getting a bad rep for not sourcing in America."

    Manager: "But if we produce these in American then we lose our relationship with the Chinese markets!"

    Director: "What can we do so this can happen?"

    PR: "Pick an American supplier who can't deliver what we need, make a big public stink about how it failed, then go with the Chinese vendor we wanted all along?"

    Director and Manager: "Perfect!"

  129. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by ranton · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I should have just passed by your original troll comment without giving it a second thought. Nothing valuable will come from further discussion with a person like you. My bad.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  130. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by fat+man's+underwear · · Score: 5, Funny

    "C&C"

    Oh like a music factory?

  131. NAFTA 2.0 by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    NAFTA 2 didn't help you any except get a stupid name for it.

    All the experts chosen to advise all the politicians get nearly all of them to agree to an unregulated global "free" market that creates all these problems. It's difficult to monitor the planet to figure out to slap on a tariff and how much it should be because in the race to the bottom the winners are due to unsafe, slave labor with illegal manufacturing conditions.

    The debate always gets into a fight about how we should have no rules just like every shit hole that undercuts the USA. You LOSE if you kill regulations and taxes because they will always win as long as you do anything better. Shipping costs can be subsidized as China has been doing... (and we aid them by paying them to haul our trash back to China.)

  132. Custom screws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, maybe Timothy 'I love the D' Cook shouldn't use custom screws in their computers. What's the point to the pentalobe screw except as a lock out device? Why not use standard Torx?

    Not that it matters to me - I would be happy if they just stopped making their horrid computers that break after 3 months. I sure would like a laptop made in the USA. But that probably isn't happening for a multitude of reasons - but for Apple it's their awful design principles.

  133. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Yea, or Apple could have just designed it with different screws. Oh, does that impinge on their creative freedom though? Oh well, then I guess the world has to burn.

  134. This is a national emergency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can't even assemble a large number of computers. What happens when we need to assemble a large number of military drones? Order them from China?

  135. History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of a story about the Robertson screw and the Model T Ford and why Phillips screws are common in the US:

    When Henry Ford tried out the Robertson screws, he found that they saved considerable time in Model T production, but when Robertson refused to license the screw design, Ford realized that the supply of screws would not be guaranteed and chose to limit their use in production to Ford's Canadian division.

  136. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are such a liar. Anything to paint mother China in a good light.

    The working conditions are awful, they have dorms but no one uses them? Except for those that do. Do you even hear yourself?

    Take that small limp Chinese dick out of your mouth.

  137. /|\ Found the DeVry MBA by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It doesn't make sense to purchase a depreciating asset. That's why many organizations and especially larger ones lease their laptops placing the cost of the lease in OpEx instead of CapEx.

    Right. And the lessor just eats the depreciation out of the goodness of their heart and doesn't fold it into the monthly payments.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re: /|\ Found the DeVry MBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can point that out all you want, but it doesn't matter.

      It's much easier to ask for $2500/yr for 5 years than $10,000 in one lump. Many companies have no capital right now but there is operating money, so if you can shift the cost that way then even though it costs more it is the difference between getting your stuff and not.

    2. Re: /|\ Found the DeVry MBA by ranton · · Score: 1

      You pointed out a good reason to leave equipment, but the original post said anyone buying equipment is "doing it wrong". This is simply false. If anything the companies who cannot afford computers up front are doing something wrong.

      If you leave anything, you are giving additional profit to a financing company. Maybe the opportunity costs are high enough to lease the equipment, sometimes they aren't. Either way no one can make a blanket statement that it is always better to either lease or buy equipment.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  138. Torx is garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what the numbers say, TORX SCREWS ARE SHIT. They were designed specifically for robots to install and I am not a goddamned robot. That's why even framers have switched. They work better in a screw gun. Working great in a gun is fine but that doesn't make them "better". The less prone to stripping claim is bullshit. They use a giant bolt head and a torx bit 2 diameters too small. They strip easy as fuck. And let me go ahead and address the number one excuse one of you yahoos is gonna tell me: The holes are clean. You cannot get the hole on bolts i've stripped any cleaner. You know what fastener doesn't give 2 shits if it is clean or not? The good ol fashioned hex bolt.

  139. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

    That's not the only gap. When I'm working on a piece of kit at 2:00 a.m. I don't want to have to call for a quote, email a gerber file, and wait for a salesperson. This is 2019. Online quoting and ordering should be a thing.

    So much this.

    American manufacturing can and should be just as automated as Chinese manufacturing. But for some reason American manufacturers feel obliged to maintain these parasitic, slow, inefficient, error prone, redundant, and worst and most importantly expensive sales monkeys in the middle of a process that practically never benefits from their presence. The number of times that the sales droid knows his own company's products well enough to offer a correction to a possible mistaken order is so slim that it's not worth having them in the way of all the many many times they gum up the works, screw up the order themselves, and cost far far too much. Their sole purpose seems to be to obfuscate prices in some misguided attempt to maximize profits by haggling over every fucking sale. It's borderline dishonest and it's definitely obnoxious.

  140. so you love china? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    So you agree that China can charge 25% tax on car imports, but USA charges 5% ?

    Yeah such a level playing field.

    Wake up, China is screwing USA, their rules are so soviet union, there is no rule of law in their country.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  141. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by gweihir · · Score: 1

    That is not the issue here. Cost of the screw (as long as not excessive) was _not_ a factor. Availability was. And all available manufacturers in the US did not have the capability and flexibility. This is a sign of an "old" economy that has not kept up.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  142. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Besides that, the Chinese are just better manufacturers due to accumulated factors of production. It's more-efficient for regions to specialize and trade.

    For everything that is not too high-tech and novel, most definitely. They invested heavily into that area while (among others) the US did not care. Hence they are now ahead. Wages play a pretty small role in this.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  143. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Amazon private prison Warehouse work $0.53/hr

  144. 20 employees, 1000 screws per day by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    This doesn't make any sense.

    Let's see, 20 employees at $20/hr x 8 hour shift = $3200/day Ignore overhead like power, water, lease, etc. $3200/1000 screws = $3.20 per screw.

    Were they making them by hand?

    Why didn't Apple just order the screws from China and ship them to the US for the factory to use to assemble the computers?

  145. Bullpussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh bullpussy! That's why he and his family all have their shit built in China- cause they fucking care. He ain't doing shit! Get the fuck outta here!

  146. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or perhaps wages in China have risen to a point that outsourcing is no longer an automatic benefit. Perhaps they have even set the first steps in to becoming consumers , giving a boost to the world economy.

  147. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    The benefits of keeping jobs in our own country fall disproportionately on our working class. Screw efficiency, we're talking about people's lives here.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  148. Id like to outsource... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...my COCK to any horny Oriental cutie who needs their pouting pussy fucked. Since I'm already in the vicinity, I can also lay some serious pipe on any African negress whose quivering quim needs inseminating.

    1. Re:Id like to outsource... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy the AIDS.

  149. Screw Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get it? Screw?!? Hahaha... but no, seriously. Thatâ(TM)s some serious failure to plan, right there.

  150. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Apple needs many, many custom proprietary screws. Because when they need to design something, they let 'er rip and Invent It Here.

    Also, you can't make something so un-repairable that it's disposable without changing the screws in the design every few weeks.

  151. More proof that Apple can't manage supply chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And thereby makes itself dependent on foreign suppliers to do it for them. Too bad NYT was too stupid to grill them on their management failures instead of assuming culpability on the part of the supplier Apple threw under the bus. The field is littered with suppliers that Apple has bankrupted with its incompetent management.

  152. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Business usually has short term priorities rather then long term plans.
    And the governments seem more interested in protecting IP then workers. Just look at the CUSMA trade thing and how quick GM reacted by shutting down non-Mexican factories. at least Canada will be forced to extend copyright for another 20 years and protect the pharmaceutical companies patents more, TPP backdoored.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  153. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

    Careful, you're dangerously close to suggesting that other countries might be legitimately better at some things than the States, and that the USA isn't the best country evarrrr in all possible measures.

    The wages argument really comes with this ugly inference that the *only* reason other countries can do things is because they are poorer.

  154. Glugs of Gosh by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Look this up, you would enjoy it. What happens when you lose your manufacturing.

    The US used to subsidize the watch making industry to make sure they could build aeroplane instruments in time of war.

  155. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ranton · · Score: 1

    The benefits of keeping jobs in our own country fall disproportionately on our working class. Screw efficiency, we're talking about people's lives here.

    It won't be the working class who benefits from most of the manufacturing jobs which are reshored back to the USA. It will be the robotics engineers, marketing staff, and sales departments. This is the biggest problem in this debate, IMHO - we don't even know what we are debating about. Increasing manufacturing in the USA is no longer about bringing back $60k/yr jobs with pensions for people with no college degrees.

    Jobs for the working class are now in sectors like customer service and retail. Since these do not pay nearly as much, we need to find ways to help them live a good life regardless of their economic value to society. I personally am a proponent of a universal basic income, but there are plenty of options. They all likely require increased progressive taxation, however, and the very politicians claiming to focus on the working class are the ones fighting against the programs which would actually help them.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  156. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More likely China bought the screw making machine from Germany. That's how Germany still maintains a strong export economy - manufacturing the machines that China uses to manufacture everything else.

  157. Thanks For Shared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  158. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask John D. Rockefeller how that approach worked out for him. Trust-busting is still a thing.

  159. well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its a chicken and egg problem. no one builds in us because theres no factories. no one has factories because no one builds in the US. if you slap tarriffs on everything , eventually a buisness will open up to fulfill that gap.

  160. If we canâ(TM)t make a screw. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Weâ(TM)re screwed.

  161. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The benefits of keeping jobs in our own country fall disproportionately on our working class. Screw efficiency, we're talking about people's lives here.

    "Screw efficiency"? Dumbest thing I've read today. I have a small business, I have some parts manufactured in China. There is absolutely no way this business would exist if I had to manufacture in the US. Couldn't exist, nor could it compete.

  162. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by jrumney · · Score: 1

    And unlike CNC, where the N stands for Numerical, and not the 'n' contraction of &

  163. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Well of course being poorer is only one reason. The other reasons are things like lower business taxes, fewer regulatory hurdles, and nonexistent environmental regulations. All of that makes it much cheaper to manufacture stuff in dirt poor nations.

  164. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Except America has shown if anything they couldn't give a crap about infrastructure.

  165. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He had the money for the wall. Instead he passed a tax cut. WTF?

  166. Wrong on the env regs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cadmium was banned worldwide. It doesnâ(TM)t matter where the screw was made.

  167. Far more costs than that by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It costs less than $2,000 to import a 40-foot shipping container.

    There is a lot more to the cost equation than just the cost of the container. If it were just the cost of a container it would be a no brainer but there is WAY more to it than that. Total landed costs for a typical product can easily make a $100 product cost $130-170 by the time it reaches its destination. I'm a cost accountant and I've worked doing global sourcing for a living out of Mexico, China, and India.

    When I ran the math in 2015, it was $1,300, making the shipping cost of a pair of men's cotton trousers from China to the dock at the US six cents.

    It's a LOT more than $0.06. Here is a very incomplete list of costs off the top of my head that will be incurred in getting the product from China to its destination in the US. Not all of these apply to all products but the point is that there is far more to it than just the cost of the container on the boat.
    1) Packaging and dunnage
    2) Inventory holding costs
    3) Cartage costs to/from ports
    4) Tariffs/duties/taxes
    5) Order management costs
    6) Lead time costs (must order products months in advance which ties up resources)
    7) Capital opportunity costs
    8) Exchange rate costs
    9) Transaction/accounting costs
    10) Insurance
    11) Engineering oversight

    You know how we make clothes in China?

    How? Yes. Do you know why? Because why is the more interesting question. Those products are made in China instead of the US because making clothing is a labor intensive process which means that labor costs are paramount. Labor costs in China and other even lower labor cost countries are SO much less that it is cheaper to make it there in spite of the overhead and logistics hassles. Yes some of the materials come from the US (also elsewhere) but the actual weaving and sewing that goes into making large volumes of clothing is only cost effective in very low labor cost countries.

    1. Re:Far more costs than that by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      There is a lot more to the cost equation than just the cost of the container

      That's not the container cost; it's the cost of getting a container full of stuff from China to a dock in the United States. It's the whole cost of moving it between those two points. Cartridge cost is another $500 or so, and is from the dock to your warehouse, which I didn't count: things made in the USA will move from your factory to a warehouse, same deal.

      Mind you, you can pack like 20,000 pairs of trousers into the damned thing.

      I'm a cost accountant and I've worked doing global sourcing for a living out of Mexico, China, and India.

      You're also using 90% word-for-word the same explanation as published by a well-respected Australian business consulting firm.

      Those products are made in China instead of the US because making clothing is a labor intensive process which means that labor costs are paramount.

      Interestingly, Chinese factory workers make about 110% GNI/C (2016). American workers's median household income is 101% GNI/C as of 2016.

      Basically, China has accumulated factors of production and so are more labor-effective at manufacturing than their US counterparts, plus Chinese are relatively more-effective at making things like clothes and other stuff they manufacture than many other things. That means China would sacrifice more to make other things than they do to simply import those other things in trade for what they make, so they become richer on a per-capita basis by manufacturing what they do for the export market.

      the actual weaving and sewing that goes into making large volumes of clothing is only cost effective in very low labor cost countries.

      Weaving is an automated process with little labor involved. The American textile industry produces one hell of a lot of fabric, notably in cotton; the Chinese industry is more known for silk, and more for the raw material.

      Essentially, making fabric is cost-effective here because we could make 1,000 yards of fabric or 50 shirts, whereas e.g. China could make 600 yards of fabric or 50 shirts. Even if we can make those shirts with half the labor that China uses, we're both better off with the US making fabric and China making shirts.

      Consider if the US makes 100 shirts and China makes 1,800 yards of fabric.

      Now China instead can make 150 shirts, while the US can instead make 2,000 yards of fabric. We're looking at 50 more shirts in total and more 200 yard of fabric in total, yet we're expending the same amount of labor. This despite China using its labor less-efficiently than the US would in making those shirts. Every arrangement in which the US tries to leverage its more-efficient labor to make shirts ends up losing out because we have to sacrifice more fabric production than China does per shirt produced.

      So you have an arbitrage: China can make 150 shirts, and the US can trade with them to reallocate the labor of making 50 shirts.

      If the American cost is $10 of inputs and $6 to produce a shirt ($16 shirt), then the Chinese cost is $10 of inputs plus $6 to make a shirt ($16). If the Chinese spend 3x as much labor on that process, then their wage is 1/3 as much as an American's wage.

  168. Manufacturing lead times by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Apple already has many, many people working closely with China as far as suppliers of everything goes. They already have a shipping pipeline so I seriously doubt for Apple it's going to take 6-14 weeks to get parts... I'm sure they would of course have some buffer of supplies, but Apple can more than afford to build up a base of supply on hand.

    I'm not just pulling that figure out of my ass. Yes it REALLY does take that sort of lead time after receipt of order in a lot of cases. Even for Apple. Yes Apple can do some things to expedite but ultimately it takes time (typically 4-8 weeks) to make product for a spot buy and the product is going to get put on a boat and it takes 3-5 weeks for a boat to get from China to the US minimum. No they aren't going to put the parts on a plane unless they absolutely have to because that costs FAR more per part. Products don't get made instantly so it takes another few weeks to actually make the product even if they are able to start immediately upon receipt of the order (rare). Even if Apple places a blanket order, that just let's the company plan production but it still takes time to make it and it still takes time to ship it.

    Let me give you an example from my company. We build a wire harness that has plastic connectors on each end. The connector parts are made in China and then shipped to Mexico for final assembly. Then they are shipped to a US distributor and then on to us. We order them 50,000 pieces at a time under a General Motors pricing contract. The company making them is a huge multinational, the distributor is a huge company, and the ultimate customer is GM so we're not talking about dealing with sweatshops here. Lead time is a non-negotiable 14 weeks after receipt of order for what really is a rather simple and standard part. Even GM could not accelerate this.

    We get the connectors for about $0.35 each - if you were to buy one yourself through distribution (think Digikey or Mouser) it would cost you over $2.00 each. And if they were out of stock it would take them... 14 weeks to get more. Why? Because the company that makes them has a finite capacity to make parts so it takes them 8 weeks to work through their backlog of orders and then another 4-6 weeks to get the product to us. This is TOTALLY normal in manufacturing.

    It's not like everything has to come from China - Apple spend $60 billion last year American suppliers... No reason that cannot grow, as long as Apple is willing to let some component costs raise - which I'm sure they are for a Mac Pro.

    No Apple is not going to be willing to budge much on component costs without very good reason. Apple has margins to protect to keep their stock price high. Big companies don't get that way by being lazy with component costs. That link you provided is just a lazy regurgitation of an Apple press release and is VERY misleading. That is Apple taking credit for any US based company they have a supplier relationship with and counting every job at that company in Apple's favor, whether or not the actual products are made in the US. You might consider getting your data from an independent source with something resembling objective analysis.

    Apple does exactly that with the old Mac Pro, and presumably the new one.

    That's just the exception that proves the rule. One high margin, low volume product made in the US (that Apple hasn't updated in years) does not a trend make. Apple is doing that more for the press value than because it makes economic sense. When they start assembling iPhones or MacBooks in the US then you might have a point. It's not just Apple either. Pretty much nobody does high volume assembly work of commodity products in the US unless it is something that can be heavily automated with a multi-year production run.

  169. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    They're living in the rural areas because they want their freedom. They don't want dorm condition with rules about things like tobacco and guns.

    A few might genuinely want that. Most, including all of my relatives, live there because they can't afford to live anywhere else, and can't get the kinds of jobs that are available in cities that offer an equivalent quality of life. A crappy job in a small town goes a lot further than a crappy job in the city.

  170. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    It's not just that.

    Think about a GM automotive factory. They make 13 types of Chevrolets, 9 models of Buick, 6 models of Cadillac, 11 models of GMC, and 4 models of Holden.

    Now imagine GM has these factories in Canada, Mexico, China, Australia, Sweden, and France.

    Now: these factories suddenly start making the similar models on their lines, with parallel lines for the variations on each platform. They may specialize in one or two engines. They ship for final assembly to one or two specialized factories.

    You start with factories that keep stopping lines and retooling to make inventory for the different models they're producing. You end up with factories that instead produce the models they can run continuously, and ship parts and finished cars around in trade.

    The second model is more-efficient: fewer stoppages and a simplified operating platform means the factories can churn out more product in the same time and with the same labor.

    It's not just that you built a manufacturing base and someone else didn't; it's that you specialized and increased efficiency in what each of you manufacture, instead of trying to produce everything in the world. This is also why standardized parts are so important: a Chinese screw factory can make billions of a certain type of screw in a continuous run by dedicating a number of its lines to that tooling based on the demand, and reallocating capacity between lines as demand shifts. Because demand is so god damned high, they aren't running small batches and then retooling; they're pumping out screws like crazy. The computer manufacturers all over the world use those screws because they're cheap and highly-available, which is a result of this standardization.

  171. Of Screw Machines & Chatting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well yeah. When one exports ones infrastructure, it takes a bit of effort to reconstitute. With that said, there's a reason one uses a specific machine to make screws; the Swiss screw machine. It is a semi-automated machine that specializes in making screws. A single machine can chug out thousands an hour. They are an analog machine and have been around for over a hundred years.

    This gnashing of teeth over their inability to find screws is silly. They clearly had no idea who or where to ask since even today, screw machine shops are all over the place for those that know where to look.

    And the person to ask? A fastener supplier of course! Someone these folks clearly didn't talk to.

  172. 3 grand is a pittance for a work tool. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Professional mechanics often spend that much on a tool box. Not the contents, the box. When you need what they do, you buy Lista instead of Harbor Freight. $30K for quality tools is not high end at all.

    Time is money and efficiency reduces wasted time. The delta between a Walmart shitbox and a mobile workstation is a trifle if you need what that workstation offers.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  173. Apple contracted with the wrong supplier. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Only one (1) CNC machining center is required to produce such a relatively small volume of parts.

    American made Haas are located in California and will happily supply competitively priced CNC machining centers capable of far more complex work. Haas are the largest machine tool builder in the western world.

    Apple either didn't do due diligence or the machine shop promised what it could not deliver.

    https://www.haascnc.com/index....

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  174. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Germany ? Japan ? Australia ? France ? UK ?

    All strong manufacturers that don't fuck their employees over by paying them a pittance.

    MURICA !!!

  175. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that all those places with the possible exception of the UK have higher standards of living than the USA too.

  176. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I wanted it via DHL for faster service anyway.

    To where, the bottom of the fucking ocean?

  177. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

    My recollection is that I spent about $80 to get it from Schenzen to Tennessee in under 24 hours. That was faster than I could fly there, pick them up, and fly back home.

  178. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure the screw factory is fully automated C&C... Otherwise you can't produce tens of thousands of screws a day. Even with Chinese work efficiency.

    The idea that Chinese manufacturing is efficient is a myth. Efficiency counts for nothing in a command economy, There is no way to calculate efficiency when the electricity, land, labour,finance etc are all subsidised. A few years ago some teenage slave labourers were killed while polishing the shiny aluminium aluminium cases of Apple iPods. They were standing up to their ankles in aluminium powder, which is a common ingredient in gun powder and rocket fuel. There was a spark. This all happened in a "high tech manufacturing plant". The efficiency in a modern supply chain is all in the finance end. The actual work takes place in third world sweat shops.

  179. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupid and racist American working class moved to the TSA (who lecherously grope), the CBP (kids in cages; then air travelers for phone pins to look into other people's phones), the police that enjoy murdering unarmed people (victims both black and white), and the low-level prosecutor occupations that are in cahoots with the blue subhumans with guns. Manufacturing was off-shored by white C-suites.

  180. Ooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that were true, then: ding-ding-ding!

  181. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then "ask" air travelers for phone pin codes at the port of entry ...

  182. Re: no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama became President after everything had been off-shored already. Keep in mind, that the Republican Party isn't really interested about having any on-shore U.S. manufacturing. The Administration in D.C. consists of these white men.

  183. Not What Made in America Means Anyways. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    No one ever believed that every part would be manufactured in america, made from American metal smelted with American oil. Ordering a screw from China does not effect that label.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  184. Re:no one in the usa will work for $2.15/hr 60-80 by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    ... feel obliged to maintain these parasitic, slow, inefficient, error prone, redundant, and worst and most importantly expensive sales monkeys in the middle of a process that practically never benefits from their presence. The number of times that the sales droid knows his own company's products well enough to offer a correction to a possible mistaken order is so slim that it's not worth having them in the way of all the many many times they gum up the works, screw up the order themselves, and cost far far too much. Their sole purpose seems to be to obfuscate prices in some misguided attempt to maximize profits by haggling over every fucking sale. It's borderline dishonest and it's definitely obnoxious.

    Reminds me of buying a car.

  185. Tiny bit off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtf? The SoC and housing most expensive parts. Screws can be stock piled. Assembly labor and space much cheaper in China and phones are small devices so cost effective to ship. Cars are assembled in US and other larger machines. But the article got attention with a provocative headline. Trade food and higher value components for phones assembly. The former a better commodity capability.