Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Might Punish Users Who Tweet 'Learn To Code' At Laid-Off Journalists (reason.com)

According to a report from Reason magazine, Twitter users who comment the "learn to code" advice at journalists who just lost their jobs might be treated as "abusive behavior," which is a violation of the social media site's terms of service. The rumor comes from Jon Levine, Media Editor at The Wrap. From the report: The Wrap's Jon Levine said representatives for the social media company had backed away from the position they related to him earlier, which was that the phrase "learn to code" itself constituted abusive behavior. The new position seems to be that "learn to code" is not de facto harassment, but could be considered harassment if tweeted aggressively as part of campaign to intimidate a specific user, in accordance with Twitter's somewhat vague abusive behavior policy. In an email to Reason, a Twitter spokesperson said: "Twitter is responding to a targeted harassment campaign against specific individuals -- a policy that's long been against the Twitter Rules."

Last week, journalists from BuzzFeed, HuffPost, Yahoo, AOL, and others, were let go. BuzzFeed founder and CEO, Jonah Peretti, said the company "would reduce headcount by 15%, or about 250 jobs, to around 1,100 employees globally," reports The Guardian. "At the same time, Verizon said it would trim 7% of headcount, about 800 people, from its media unit, which includes HuffPost, Yahoo and AOL. The job losses followed sales or cuts at Mic, Refinery29 and elsewhere."

418 comments

  1. hmmm.... by crgrace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But it lets Trump abuse people all day long...

    1. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It also lets people abuse Trump supporters all day long. See: literal death threats and inciting violence against MAGA hat kid just last week.

    2. Re:hmmm.... by Dan667 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      uh, that does not make it ok. And the President of the United States should be setting the standard, not encouraging everyone to behave as shitty as he does.

    3. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We elected an alpha male. Unfortunately for you, the experience is not going to be "pleasant" because he has a mission to burn through as much of the establishment shadow government as he can in eight years to make America great again. We didn't elect a figurehead. We didn't elect a Republican. We elected an outsider who is the biggest of a populist president since Jackson.
       
      It's for your better good, so deal with it.

    5. Re:hmmm.... by crgrace · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the famous Whataboutism. Perhaps all people should be held to the same standard. Is this not the nation where "All men are created equal"? Ahem.

    6. Re:hmmm.... by crgrace · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Crazy times we live in when a statement of fact is "flamebait".

    7. Re: hmmm.... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 0

      commenting simply to undo incorrect moderation

    8. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah yes the famous 'your argument is invalid because of pointing out they are doing the same thing' argument. Yep that makes what they said totally invalid. You sure got them there!

    9. Re:hmmm.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is this not the nation where "All men are created equal"? Ahem.

      As long as they are not CIS-gender, white men... Or to the right of Mao or Stalin. Or eat meat. Or ever drove a truck. Or made a comment that could ever possibly make anyone feel uncomfortable. Other than that, yes - we're all equal. Especially if you choose to break 18 USC 1924 and are well-connected, politically - that makes you more equal than others!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also entertains the idea that there's an exhaustive natural dichotomous relationship between 'left' and 'right', yeah?

      Wait no sorry too many big words sorry sorry sorry gotta remember you poor MAGA kids don't understand irony or sarcasm

      You know what.

      I kinda feel bad for shooting you while you're in that barrel, fish boy.

    11. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you need a personal hug just for you?

      that would be very masculine and stoic and resilient, don't you think?

    12. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah we elected a con man. And it sounds like you've bought into completely to the con.

    13. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you put "cis" in capitals? Is it an acronym?

    14. Re:hmmm.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the famous Whataboutism. Perhaps all people should be held to the same standard. Is this not the nation where "All men are created equal"? Ahem.

      Bill and Ted said it best "Be Excellent to Each Other."

      There's always time to start.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trump is part of the establishment, endorsing Hillary Clinton, and always rubbing elbows with the rich

    16. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nah, con men never deliver. Trump actually does.

      - 2 Concervative Supreme Court Justices
      - Massive number of conservative federal judges
      - Bitch slap to China trade practices after decades of "professional" politicians turning a blind eye
      - Best economy - well ever actually
      - Massive cuts to ridiculous regulation and trade barriers
      - NATO members are scared enough to actually start investing in their militaries again.
      - Actually supporting Vets instead of patting them on the head and letting them die waiting on medical appointments

    17. Re:hmmm.... by jeff4747 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry, do you need a safe space so you can talk about it?

    18. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're mentally ill. Do you realize that? No, of course you don't, otherwise you'd be seeking help instead of insanely comparing support for the president with the KKK.

      Your mental illness has allowed you to be brainwashed by DNC bullshit. They need little minions to help carry out their plans of overthrow, and you are allowing them to use you as one of their pawns. Everything they've fed you about Trump is propaganda, and you're parroting it just as they've told you to. In the meantime, you fail to see the real enemy.

      All part of the plan.

    19. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butt it doesn't let normal people abuse faggots like you. So be of good cheer, or gay, as you prefer.

    20. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Omg! No facts! You racist republikkkan bastard!

      Orange Man Bad! Orange Man Bad!1!

      Eeeeeeeeeep!

      I need to go harvest a bunch of illegal votes now to feel better.

    21. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I voted for Hillary, so you can exclude me, and well, the majority of the people who voted.

      "We" did collectively vote for Trump. Despite your personal vote, in a democracy, the winner is who we as a nation voted for. You may not like the result, but he is your President as the result of the election by the rules of the election. Had Clinton won, you'd surely be saying that "we" voted for her and that she's our President. Your bigoted hatred does not make the hypocrisy of your statements any less.

      In your attempt to show your superiority, you're showing your complete ignorance. You show complete lack of understanding how our Republic works and why. You show no concept of reality by trying to claim illegitimacy by mentioning the popular vote when no one can say how the election would have turned out had the rules been different. Campaigns would have been different. The issues put forth would have been different. Even people in states that heavily lean one way may have voted differently (or actually voted).

    22. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love crybaby nazi pseudo-victim privileged Republican INCEL teens, they're fucking hilarious, but for some reason I don't think you realize why you're funny.

    23. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually the majority of people voted for Bernie before Hilary, but the DNC made the choice for you.

    24. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      But it lets Trump abuse people all day long...

      Twitter has been the far left SJW hate machine for years. The far left weaponized twitter years ago and have done far worse that Trump even at his worse without a single complaint from people like you and all those poor so called journalists that openly mock the idea that the code of ethics for journalism has anything to do with them. People in America don't trust journalists for a reason. They lie more often than our politicians. When you combine social media and American journalism, you get this unholy union of bastards who scream their hate at the top of their lungs and enjoy banning people at the drop of the hat over nothing.

      You don't get banned on twitter for breaking the rules. You get banned based off your political beliefs. Funny how you whine about Trump not getting banned even though he hasn't broken the rules. Now, twitter wants to ban people for hurting the feelings of fake news journalists. Oh go to hell you freaking crybaby.

    25. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're projecting a little to hard lad, maybe switch to decaf.

    26. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think the clothing people wear should dictate your behavior towards them? (Rape apologist)

      And should also exonerate your call to violence again them? (Dehumanizing)

      Maybe next you should force them into concentration camps. (4th Reich)

      That seems like a good untraveled road to go down, with no foreseeable consequences.

    27. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be.

      Traditionally CIS stands for Commonwealth of Independent States
      With this definition CIS-men and CIS-women would be the people from former Soviet states.

    28. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how you think it's fine to mock oppression when it's happening to white men. I wonder how you would feel if someone started calling women and minorities delicate for complaining about being oppressed too. No, let's not kid ourselves, I don't have to wonder at all. You would be screaming "Racism!" and "Nazi!" so loud you would wake your neighbors.

      But it's okay when YOU do it, right? Cause that's different.

      And yet I bet your delicate sensibilities are triggered by something as mild as someone daring to say "It's okay to be white" in your earshot.

    29. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill and Ted said it best "Be Excellent to Each Other."

      In the new sequel they're going to revise it to "Be Excellent to Anyone Higher On The Oppression Pyramid Than You."

    30. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We donâ(TM)t live in a democracy. We live in a representative republic.

    31. Re:hmmm.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I miss sarcasm and irony tags, so ... you really believe that, do you?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    32. Re:hmmm.... by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Because he apparently doesn't like dudes who work with Communication & Information Systems.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    33. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? Are you 2 years old or something? Stop pretending its 'same rules for everyone'

    34. Re:hmmm.... by Tsolias · · Score: 1

      I don't want to argue with idiots, so I'll leave this here.

      Yikes, libtards... smh.

    35. Re:hmmm.... by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      We elected an alpha male.

      You elected a conman pretending to be a paper tiger.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    36. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no argument. That's why the extent of your political discourse is apologetics and empty name-calling. I see it all the time with conservatives.

    37. Re:hmmm.... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Shh, it's not nice to point out somebody's Hippocratic behavior unless its Trumps. You know, judging him on skin color, appearance, and abnormalities. Or so serviscope_minor would like us to believe. He only wants equality for *his* people.

    38. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >We elected an alpha male.

      ORANGE MAN BAD!

    39. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Youre confused. Trump isnt the one bowing to foreign dictators.

    40. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the President is as FINE as frog hair. Trump is the perfection in the role as the Anti-Obama and the Not-Hillary.

    41. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL Trump is not an alpha male, even by your batshit standards he is the definition of a beta male, weak and cowardly who bullies those weaker than him in a futile attempt to look strong

      And "outsider" LOL - real estate developers are politicians to their core, they are basically just a subset of lobbyist

    42. Re:hmmm.... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      That's correct.

      Another thing that happens is that television networks and print media report on the things he says.

      It's almost as though being President of the United States gives some sort of special privileges.Who'd have thought?

    43. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the journalists shouldn't have told coal miners and auto workers to learn to code huh?

    44. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that if anyone says anything you disagree with you seem to believe that you're suffering a lifetime of oppression from it.

      You just described the left (especially the SJWs). Lifetime oppression, like not hiring enough of some intersection to satisfy you? Or maybe manspreading.

    45. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      when it ain't broken

      Please identify which of the list provided by AC isn't true, wasn't broken? Everything listed are things that have changed and changed in a way that significantly benefits America and her citizens.

    46. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When this gets "1, insightful' You know slashdot has become an echo chamber for the unhinged

    47. Re:hmmm.... by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      For one thing, most of what is good about the economy was done by Obama. You can't rate "best economy" on a timeline of 2 years. Trump definitely put a fire under it but it's a fire that is going to burn out and there is already talk of recession.

      Massive cuts to trade regulation and barriers: He created tarriffs for Canada and China, how is that reducing barriers to trade? Yes NAFTAv2 was signed under him but has yet to be ratified and no one is sure if it will.

      The rest are debatable whether they are good things.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    48. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they don't try to conform to the idea that their world view is the best and everyone should accept it to get back to the good ol' days when they were empowered to make others adopt it.

      FTFY.

    49. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... the President of the United States should be setting the standard, not encouraging everyone to behave as shitty as he does.

      Funny, I thought it was Hillary who was telling people to be uncivil:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzXS8r4SpnQ

      And I'm pretty sure it was Maxine Wauters who was encouraging people to harass Trump supporters in the streets:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VVfXfb7ukY

      What was it that Trump said again? Oh right, he wants a united America, not one that's divided by petty squabbling:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATFwMO9CebA

      It's like you fucking retards can't even pay attention to the politics you claim to be so involved in.

      I posted those links from Canada. FUCKING CANADA. I'm paying attention to the details and it's not even my own fucking garbage that's on fire, so what in the fuck is your malfunction?

    50. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no one expected the economy to do well. not obama, his administration, or people that laughed when he was going to get more than 2%.

      yea, but it's obama that did it.

    51. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straw man.

    52. Re:hmmm.... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Is it 'better the con you see than the one you don't' time?

      Or did you like it when that all was happening virtually unopposed? Me, I like it when the philosophy I reject is being rejected and overthrown. Those that support that philosophy, though, even resort to direct violence in response. War? Molon Labe.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    53. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight. A group can go on about "micro aggressions" completely straight faced, but if a white guy says -anything- they're a delicate snowflake?
      You're kind of just proving the point gp was making.

    54. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drumpf is a criminal. He's incompetent. And these are his best qualities. There's nothing bigoted or hateful about despising a vile president. Some things deserve to be hated.

      Because we still have a semblance of rule of law, this piece of crap so-called president is still in office. The fact that he was elected according to the rules doesn't legitimize his presidency. It says the system is broken.

      It astounds me that tens of millions of people believe Drumpf is a good president. The biggest lesson of events since 2016 is that American voters are idiots. There is more to civic responsibility than voting. The well-being of the republic depends on voting RESPONSIBLY.

      Cripes.

    55. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "We" did collectively vote for Trump.

      No "We" collectively voted for Hillary. The popular vote was not for Trump. "We" the Electoral College voted for Trump.

      So spare us your failures in political science.

    56. Re:hmmm.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Bill and Ted said it best "Be Excellent to Each Other."

      In the new sequel they're going to revise it to "Be Excellent to Anyone Higher On The Oppression Pyramid Than You."

      The Oppression Pyramid. Awesome - That is my new touchstone!!!

      Wait..... I web searched - and it's real. Jezzuz H Kryste.

      So many crazy humans - so few Chicxulub meteors.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    57. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, con men never deliver. Trump actually does.

      - 2 Concervative Supreme Court Justices
      - Massive number of conservative federal judges
      - Bitch slap to China trade practices after decades of "professional" politicians turning a blind eye
      - Best economy - well ever actually
      - Massive cuts to ridiculous regulation and trade barriers
      - NATO members are scared enough to actually start investing in their militaries again.
      - Actually supporting Vets instead of patting them on the head and letting them die waiting on medical appointments

      *citation needed*

    58. Re:hmmm.... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      Hopefully you're just being facetious for a laugh, but it's hard to tell this day and age.

      But to answer anyway: as far as I can tell, he wasn't shaking, crying, screaming at the sky, or seeking literal counseling. He simply stated the modern day situation as he sees it and pointed out some hypocrisies.
      When 'progressives' seriously attempt to equate the two enormously different reactions to 'throw it back in their face' it's just beyond absurd, it's kind of the equivalent to "I'm rubber and you're glue" in maturity as well as effectiveness.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    59. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No that's feminine, patronizing and emotionally manipulative.

      Masculine stoicism would be bearing the brunt of the force alone and never expecting a good thing because of it, doing a thing with the knowledge that no one will treat you like it matters. AKA no hugs.

    60. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Trump abuse people on Twitter? I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'd just like some examples.

    61. Re: hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Youre confused. Trump isnt the one bowing to foreign dictators.

      No, he only takes their word over the assessment of his own intelligence agencies.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    62. Re:hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Is it 'better the con you see than the one you don't' time?

      Or did you like it when that all was happening virtually unopposed? Me, I like it when the philosophy I reject is being rejected and overthrown. Those that support that philosophy, though, even resort to direct violence in response. War? Molon Labe.

      Agreed. Good thing the Justice Dept is taking apart Trump's organization one person at a time. If Trump wanted Hillary locked up, he should have hired her to work on his campaign.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    63. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A small percentage of those let go are actual journalist. The vast majority are those people who comment on pop culture or report on unsubstantiated rumors meant to advance SJW agendas.

      The progressive left wing media is dying. Among other things the moderate left, those so sickened by the antics of the unhinged left wing, are starting to realize if they want to actually start winning elections again they need to stop ignoring the toxic actions of these people.

      Before anyone says it. Yes the Democrats took the house. Barely. By historical trends they should have dominated the house elections and retaken the senate. Instead they barely took the house and look to be doing nothing but setting up for the next election, which they realize they'll lose if their nominee has to pander to the radical left wing.

      It wasn't an accident Clinton (Bill not Hillary) took the presidency. he spent a good decade dragging the Democratic party more to the center. If Hillary was half the politician he was and anywhere near the center instead of a Saul Alinsky radical she would have won the last presidential election.

      Instead we can look forward to the Democrats continuing to demean the very people they expect to vote for them, and then wonder why they lost. Maybe they can blame it on China this time.

    64. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not like the result, but he is your President as the result of the election by the rules of the election.

      That is in doubt, there are some sketchy behaviors in states that "Trump" allegedly won. Oddly, they aren't being investigated. But how can you explain so many voters disappearing? Where did they go?

      Had Clinton won, you'd surely be saying that "we" voted for her and that she's our President. Your bigoted hatred does not make the hypocrisy of your statements any less.

      Clinton did get more popular votes than Trump and his bigoted hatred as well as the shameless hypocrisy of his own supporters leads to them making unsupported claims about the elections bending somehow rigged. So go whine to somebody else.

      Some of us, you know, we've been protesting the electoral college since the bogus nature of its whole construction became apparent, and have done so consistently for decade.

      Trump is documented as calling for a revolution in 2012, and making up stories about 2016, and when he got ass-walloped in 2018, all he could do was make a fallacious set of self-promotion which was akin to how he did the same when he reacted to Roy Moore the twice removed being defeated.

    65. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no argument. That's why the extent of your political discourse is apologetics and empty name-calling. I see it all the time with conservatives.

      Yea, he's deplorable huh?

    66. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't see LynnwoodRoosters YouTube video then. He said those same words when the Gillette razor commercial came out. He raged and fumed, cried and pouted. I thought I was watching the Toddler Tantrum hour.

      He also did it when it was shoes, pizzas, and Teslas. And that Senator who wore a dress and boots? He was just weeping over the indignity admonishing her for the indignity and wishing there was somebody to put her in her place.

    67. Re:hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Is this not the nation where "All men are created equal"? Ahem.

      As long as they are not CIS-gender, white men... Or to the right of Mao or Stalin. Or eat meat. Or ever drove a truck. Or made a comment that could ever possibly make anyone feel uncomfortable. Other than that, yes - we're all equal. Especially if you choose to break 18 USC 1924 and are well-connected, politically - that makes you more equal than others!

      Is 18 USC 1924 the one that gets you into the champagne unit of the TANG and then lets you go AWOL to work on your dad's campaign? Or is it the one that finds a doctor that will diagnose you with bone spurs so you don't have to go to Vietnam?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    68. Re:hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      Funny how you think it's fine to mock oppression when it's happening to white men. I wonder how you would feel if someone started calling women and minorities delicate for complaining about being oppressed too. No, let's not kid ourselves, I don't have to wonder at all. You would be screaming "Racism!" and "Nazi!" so loud you would wake your neighbors.

      But it's okay when YOU do it, right? Cause that's different.

      And yet I bet your delicate sensibilities are triggered by something as mild as someone daring to say "It's okay to be white" in your earshot.

      It's funny because white men have historically, and in the present, had advantages in society purely because of the color of their skin. Now that their dominant position is being encroached upon by women and people of other skin colors, some of them cry oppression. White men are not oppressed in American society; not by a long shot.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    69. Re: hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      You're mentally ill. Do you realize that? No, of course you don't, otherwise you'd be seeking help instead of insanely comparing support for the president with the KKK.

      Your mental illness has allowed you to be brainwashed by DNC bullshit. They need little minions to help carry out their plans of overthrow, and you are allowing them to use you as one of their pawns. Everything they've fed you about Trump is propaganda, and you're parroting it just as they've told you to. In the meantime, you fail to see the real enemy.

      All part of the plan.

      Dude, members of the KKK literally endorsed Donald Trump. https://www.vox.com/2017/8/12/...

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    70. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shh, it's not nice to point out somebody's Hippocratic behavior unless its Trumps. You know, judging him on skin color, appearance, and abnormalities. Or so serviscope_minor would like us to believe. He only wants equality for *his* people.

      Hippocratic behavior. Really?

    71. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tubby conman who made his cash from daddies money, doesn't pay bills, treats women like crap and barely puts in a full days work in the most important job in the world is your idea of an alpha male?

      Jeez, do you fap over Kevin James pictures in your spare time?

    72. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't an accident Clinton (Bill not Hillary) took the presidency. he spent a good decade dragging the Democratic party more to the center. If Hillary was half the politician he was and anywhere near the center instead of a Saul Alinsky radical she would have won the last presidential election.

      LOL, we spend 8 years hearing how Obama was a radical leftwinger, we spent the 8 years of Clinton's presidency hearing how he was so radical left-wing that the Conservative Right had the save America from him by going more extreme, then we had Hillary condemned for being utterly right-wing herself throughout the last election by actual liberals, and now you believe your claims of the opposite will have traction?

      Hillary's problem was that she just isn't as personable as her husband and she didn't pick an exciting VP candidate to drum up the votes in places that mattered. She should have gone with a popular Midwesterner. Instead, bland Whiteman number 2 after Biden.

    73. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Number of Trump supporters who've shot up places/ sent bombs/run over defenceless people: lots.

      Number of Hilary supporters who've done similar: zero.

    74. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't believe the assessments made by the people who tricked us into invading Iraq? Amazing.

    75. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn dude, after that list this is the best you could do?

    76. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, any current windfall is due to the previous president. It typically takes a year or more for any policies to become enacted into law. This means that the first 1-2 years of a president's term are usually effects from the previous president. You don't see the very first effects of the current president until his 2nd year into office. Now that layoffs are starting, it should be a sign that Trumps decisions are finally taking effect.

    77. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation: Reality

    78. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago on the line for you, sir. Seems there's several thousand dead black people who want to have a word with you.

    79. Re:hmmm.... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      no one expected the economy to do well. not obama, his administration, or people that laughed when he was going to get more than 2%.

      You mean the economy that was doing about as well under Obama as it is now? Trump loved to tweet about stock market records, but a 10-year graph of the Dow will show a pretty consistent rise in performance. There was a short blip in 2011, a year-long pause from late 2015 - late 2016, and another pause from Feb 2018 - today. These bull markets do not last forever though -- this is the longest on record. I would expect a "correction" and transition to bear market soon. I doubt there's actually anything the President could do about it either.

    80. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now do one about short skirts.

    81. Re:hmmm.... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, if you look at CDP per capita charts it very clearly shows an upward trend starting in 2012. Who cares about the markets?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    82. Re:hmmm.... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      A recession caused by rate increases that should have happened no more than 5 years after the massive stimulus packages in 2008-9. However somehow the Fed saw the need to just keep putting those off until Obama was out of office and a republican was in the White House. Funny that.

    83. Re:hmmm.... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Given the different voting laws and even different weather conditions in various states the popular vote means exactly dick in a nationwide election. If you weren't such a complete fucking moron you would understand that.

    84. Re:hmmm.... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      You're going to need to revise that to "3 Concervative Supreme Court Justices" pretty soon, as Ginsberg's death watch is on 20 days with no proof-of-life. Trump should personally invite her to the SOTU Address. Either she shows up or she's impeachably incapacitated.

    85. Re:hmmm.... by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      A bigger joke than Obama getting a Nobel peace prize, right before expanding Bush's "War on Terror"...?

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    86. Re: hmmm.... by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I trust russia more than I trust CIA or FBI. Fuck the deep state, and fuck anyone implying that getting a foreign 2nd opinion on anything is unpatriotic. Shove that stupid stateist propaganda up your dumb snowflake ass.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    87. Re:hmmm.... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      That's correct.

      Another thing that happens is that television networks and print media report on the things he says.

      Yes, they do... with an editorial filter, sufficient spin and nuance to fit their biases and narratives, and oh yeah - omissions of any brutally contradictory fact: you know, for 'brevity'. Afterwards, they toss on a megaton of opinion-makers and talking heads to either bury or twist the original message.

      Mind, this is just as true of Fox News as it is of MSNBC or CNN.

      Twitter (or, well, any popular social media, really) allows the President (or any other sufficiently-followed figure, really) to get their own message out. You get it raw, unfiltered, and without spin, nuance, or (usually) modification to fit a prevailing narrative.

      It's certainly a two-edged sword for the President (e.g. reference to 'Congressman Shitt' was hilarious, but debasing to the office), but I bet there's more than a few ideology-mongers out there who would much prefer to regain the unquestioned control that they once had over their narratives. You know, for your own (and their advertisers') good.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    88. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the way he sees the "modern day situation" is reactionary hogwash.The president of the US is:

      a CIS-gender, white man
      to the right of Mao and Stalin.
      eats meat (hamberders!)
      regularly makes comments that make many people feel uncomfortable.

      Somehow this makes him "less than equal"? Like he's an oppressed minority or something?

      True, I can't say for certain he has ever driven a truck.

      But perhaps it's that he's broken18 USC 1924 and is well-connected, politically - that makes him more equal than others!

    89. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of that is simply untrue

    90. Re:hmmm.... by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      The economy is running on the afterburners of deficit spending. If the economy is running the best ever, shouldn't we be running a surplus or at least a shrinking deficit? Borrowing money to stimulate the economy certainly "works" but at the expense of greater interest payments. That's why responsible governments shrink the deficit in good times.

      In FY 2018 the federal deficit was 3.9 percent of GDP.

      This year, FY 2019, the federal government in its latest budget has estimated that the deficit will be 4.7 percent of GDP.

      https://www.usgovernmentdebt.u...

      --
      -Dave
    91. Re: hmmm.... by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      So by linking to blatant anti-Trump propaganda made by one of the most egregious DNC mouthpieces, you just help prove AC's point. Thanks.

    92. Re:hmmm.... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I was being a little snarky, but ultimately a lot of people want to see what the President has to say. This is not just his fans. I want to know what the guy has to say even though I think he's a complete fool.

      He's also someone who can be made a special case of. The fact that the US president is on twitter is a selling point for the platform. As such twitter can justify the cost of considering a special case, and consider how seriously he might mean what he says, and how seriously he might be taken.

    93. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "I trust russia more than I trust CIA or FBI"
      That's because you're a bigger fucking idiot than Trumplethinskin

    94. Re:hmmm.... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      How is that James Baker testimony working out for you?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    95. Re: hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      He doesn't believe the assessments made by the people who tricked us into invading Iraq? Amazing.

      You really think that's what happened, that the CIA "tricked" us into invading Iraq? No wonder you back this clown.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    96. Re: hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Damn dude, after that list this is the best you could do?

      It was plenty.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    97. Re: hmmm.... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Dude, who did Louis Farrakan endorse?

      There is more that one racist group in this country, you know.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    98. Re: hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I trust russia more than I trust CIA or FBI. Fuck the deep state, and fuck anyone implying that getting a foreign 2nd opinion on anything is unpatriotic. Shove that stupid stateist propaganda up your dumb snowflake ass.

      Why would you trust either one?

      Look man, Guccifer 2.0 was outed as a Russian intelligence front by the Dutch intelligence services. They are the ones who told the CIA and NSA about the Russian hacking of the DNC. They literally watched the operatives walking in and out of the building that housed the Internet Research Agency. Are the Dutch part of the Deep State too? Facebook has admitted that they were used by Russian actors to influence US popular opinion, both on the left and the right. It is also well known that Putin really hates Hillary Clinton. Trump should know all this.

      But Trump asked Putin about his government running operations against the US, and Putin said they didn't. That was good enough for Trump! He literally took the word of the guy who is accused over the researched and substantiated assessment of the US intelligence agencies. It's ridiculous.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    99. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how come the electoral college has only been involved in picking two presidents? Both republican?

    100. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ????? Trump isn't solving that. And that's a class issue. Drugs run Chicago. Until they get rid of their corrupt local government, nothing will change.

      Are those black people taking their anger out on white republicans? No? They are taking it out on themselves.

    101. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of President, I don't see how Supreme Court Justices should count. It really depends on when there is an opening (and if the House isn't being an obstructionist)

    102. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUT HER EMAILS!

    103. Re: hmmm.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Likely four, Thomas isn't going to repeat Ginsburg's mistake. He will resign a be replaced by a younger conservate.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    104. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not like the result, but he is your President as the result of the election by the rules of the election.

      That is in doubt, there are some sketchy behaviors in states that "Trump" allegedly won. Oddly, they aren't being investigated. But how can you explain so many voters disappearing? Where did they go?

      They stayed home because there was no black candidate to vote for. Barring that, both candidates sucked ass, so there is that too.

      Had Clinton won, you'd surely be saying that "we" voted for her and that she's our President. Your bigoted hatred does not make the hypocrisy of your statements any less.

      Clinton did get more popular votes than Trump and his bigoted hatred as well as the shameless hypocrisy of his own supporters leads to them making unsupported claims about the elections bending somehow rigged. So go whine to somebody else.

      Some of us, you know, we've been protesting the electoral college since the bogus nature of its whole construction became apparent, and have done so consistently for decade.

      Trump is documented as calling for a revolution in 2012, and making up stories about 2016, and when he got ass-walloped in 2018, all he could do was make a fallacious set of self-promotion which was akin to how he did the same when he reacted to Roy Moore the twice removed being defeated.

      Just because Trump knew how to play the game, and Hillary played zone defense and ignored her entire fucking base, that doesn't mean the system doesn't work. It means that she missed the mark, she did. She only won the popular vote because of California and New York. So explain how the rest of the fucking country would get a say in elections without something like the electoral college? It may need a little tweaking, but the idea is still good. #Votedforhillary #doesnotmakemeimmunetoreality

    105. Re:hmmm.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Vote Pony Party! Vote Hippocracy! Vote Vermin Supreme 2020!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    106. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he just happened to be President when some SC justices died/retired. Wow such brilliant innovation! Good job existing! He's also the only U.S. President ever to hold office in 2018 WOW!!!1

    107. Re: hmmm.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Thank dog!

      You can go cry in the corner now, accept the 2nd amendment will be healthy on your dying day, then go cry some more.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    108. Re:hmmm.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You called post 2000 dotcom1.0 the Clinton recession? No? I'm shocked.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    109. Re: hmmm.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      All VPs since Quayle have been assassination insurance (worse than the president).

      Which is why Hillary was never VP, that would have been assassination assurance, despite being worse.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    110. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure it was just skin color and not advances in sciences, humanities, culture and art which never took place in the ooga booga continent?

    111. Re:hmmm.... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Supreme Court members are under no obligation to attend.

      Many think it is actually unseemly as this is political theater by the two political branches.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    112. Re:hmmm.... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The word you are trying to use is hypocritical not hippocratic. There's more than enough hypocrisy for both sides of the isle.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    113. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And because someone in the KKK endorsed Trump everyone who endorses Trump is in the KKK. Got it. Perfectly sane reasoning there.

    114. Re:hmmm.... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Yea early morning posting does not bring my A game, D at best. NFI, I cant even asplain what happened there.. .

    115. Re: hmmm.... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it is involved in every presidential election. I could be wrong though. I am high..

    116. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll go farther and say there are only a negligible amount of people on the planet I trust *less* than the CIA.

    117. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing says "High IQ" like throwing around childish nicknames at people you don't like.

    118. Re: hmmm.... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      You really think that's what happened, that the CIA "tricked" us into invading Iraq? No wonder you back this clown.

      As opposed to the other side which is trying to convince us that boys can become girls and girls can become boys? No thanks... I'm not a huge fan of Trump, I think he could do better, and I think he's gotten some things correct, but I try to give him the benefit of the doubt. But, the other side is absolutely fucking loony. Not to mention the fact that the extreme left is the biggest bunch of racists I've ever personally met.. It's either "white people are the source of all the worlds problems" or it's "We have to look out for minorities because they can't stand up for themselves and need a bunch of white leftists to be their voice". Both are insulting... You don't combat racism with more racism.

    119. Re: hmmm.... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to call you out on that one. Where are these death threats Twitter hasn't removed? Show me.

    120. Re:hmmm.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No, it's about running to Canada and then taking and no properly storing State secrets...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    121. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all those medieval peasants had it so great!

    122. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Political figure, sometimes you say things just for show and you don't mean them literally.

      Like how feminist say it's about equality, when in reality it's about hating men and consolidating power.

    123. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whaaaaaaa whaaaaaaa!

      Things didn't turn out the way I wanted them, everyone else is stupid!

      I don't respect the democratic process when it doesn't go my way!

    124. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But she still lost, so please keep beating that dead horse.

    125. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's they?

      You mean like an extremely small group that held power over everyone else such as warlords, dictators, and monarchies?

      I don't see anyone wishing for those times, are you retarded?

      I wish free speech wasn't being stifled by sjw uni-professors who think communism is a great idea.

      How many did Stalin and Mao kill?

    126. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey guys, I'm going to use some big words my gender studies teacher taught us.

      No they don't help me get a job, but I get to feel superior to those that work hard but without working!

    127. Re:hmmm.... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Much bigger

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    128. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how bout dem Iraqi wmds

    129. Re: hmmm.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      And because someone in the KKK endorsed Trump everyone who endorses Trump is in the KKK. Got it. Perfectly sane reasoning there.

      I'm not saying Trump is racist. I'm saying racists think Trump is racist.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    130. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as long as the NRA is in charge. Thanks to their sellout to the Russians, we'll watch them crash and burn as their anti-patriotism kills them off.

    131. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They stayed home because there was no black candidate to vote for. Barring that, both candidates sucked ass, so there is that too.

      A possible explanation, but unfortunately, the Voting integrity Commission doesn't exist to determine that was the only thing.

      Just because Trump knew how to play the game, and Hillary played zone defense and ignored her entire fucking base, that doesn't mean the system doesn't work. It means that she missed the mark, she did. She only won the popular vote because of California and New York. So explain how the rest of the fucking country would get a say in elections without something like the electoral college? It may need a little tweaking, but the idea is still good. #Votedforhillary #doesnotmakemeimmunetoreality

      You do seem immune to reality, since I pointed out the objections to the electoral college have nothing to do with Trump, or anyone else, as they long predate his forays into politics. It is simply a flawed system that does nothing to promote the ensure that any part of the country gets a say in the presidential elections, not just because it still relies on legislative fiat but as we all know from history lessons, has not acted in any positive way at all.

      Seriously, there is a complete absence of accomplishments for it. Instead we just have a handful of questions about the elections.

      Sorry. It has no merit. And proposals to change or eliminate it date back to the 1800s.

      Your lack of appreciation that people detest it simply because they can see it serves no purpose is a lack of recognizance on your part.

    132. Re: hmmm.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The NRA sold us out a long time before that. You should be a GOA member, keeping the NRA membership is optional.

      Your never going to get through the next six years, unless you reconnect to reality.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    133. Re:hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White men aren't oppressed, but I've had to hear my entire life how its all my fault. It wasn't good enough that I was poor, came from a broken family at a young age, spent time as an orphan, was on welfare/food stamps and moved 8 times across 4 different states (Florida to California eventually) all before I was 17 years old.

      But sure, it's all my fault. Forget the fact that I'm of Irish decent and could of been a slave of some English prick. White slavery doesn't count of course.

      Some how pounding that into me was some how good for my self esteem and self worth. Thanks!!!

    134. Re: hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I never thought about it, but it makes perfect sense why certain people picked other people for running mates.

      I've definitely thought about it regarding Trump and Pence. Most people are terrified of what Pence would do on social issues if he was the POTUS.

    135. Re: hmmm.... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Nothing to back it up with, as usual

  2. funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot canâ(TM)t even code their site properly. What are liberal arts majors to do?

    1. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to code, obviously

    2. Re:funny by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      The only people with problems seem to be Apple customers. I would hesitate to say it is Slashdot's problem.

    3. Re: funny by unixisc · · Score: 2

      It's funny. This is the advice that these media supporters of woke corporations gave the people they laid off over the years for the last several years. Now that it's being turned on them, it's abusive. It's funny to see those who dish it out being so unable to take it.

      Maybe teach those Lib Arts majors Assembly Language programming for starters, which would avoid getting into concepts like classes, structures and so on, and just deal w/ registers, memories, accumulators and so on

    4. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just teach the fuckers Perl, it makes as much sense out of what comes out of their mouths anyway

    5. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I mean, itâ(TM)s Appleâ(TM)s fault for supporting an RFC over a decade old.

      https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5198

      Idiot.

    6. Re:funny by gabebear · · Score: 1

      I guess we could all just use 7bit ASCII to keep compatible with Slashdot... Apple devices do use curly/smart quotes more often; but it’s definitely not confined to them.

      Chrome is quickly becoming the new IE/ActiveX. This is why we can’t have nice things.

    7. Re:funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quotes work fine: “ ” Apple must be encoding them differently than everybody else’s working browsers. I am certain that Slasdot supports more than 7-bit ASCII.

    8. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking racist python fagz! Perl 2020!

    9. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (((Programming in) LISP is) fun for everyone!)

    10. Re:funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      “” send from my iPad.

    11. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoeâ sent from my ipad again but this time using slashdots mobile version.

    12. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      “And we see the real problem is slashdots shit website design”. The quotes work fine on the non-mobile site but stop working on the mobile site.

      Send from my iPad.

    13. Re:funny by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Apple users even know how to use proper ASCII punctuation any more. Isn't there some mode you can set to use ASCII?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    14. Re: funny by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So.. there's a simple solution here. Don't use the mobile site. Mobile sites are almost always shitty.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    15. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LISP is so racist. Just look at those (((parenthesis))). Obvious anti-semetic programming language.

      The only non-offensive language is C+=, or C-plus-Equality. Strangely, nearly every major code repo out there has banned C+= for being too offensive, but you know how SJWs and NPCs love to turn on each other all the time. Must've been one of those incidents.

    16. Re: funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The full site doesn’t work with curly '.

    17. Re: funny by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Maybe if the Journalists had learned coding, their thinking would be disciplined enough so that the main stream medias wouldn't be the festering cesspool of lies and hidden agendas that it has become.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  3. Irony: AI will replace software engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only profession I know of where the employees are obsoleting themselves.

    1. Re:Irony: AI will replace software engineers by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Can they? Why not ask them to simply write VLIW compilers - a project that worked so well at Multiflow, Cydrome, HP and Intel?

  4. Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tweeting "Learn to code" is harassment.
    However, giving death threats to high school kids who are attacked by racists is acceptable.

    Got it. Punishing people based on political views is acceptable.
    Thanks liberals for letting us know how "tolerant" you all are.

    1. Re:Covenginton by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tweeting "Learn to code" is harassment.

      No, it isn't. The summary itself contradicts the flamebait headline:

      representatives for the social media company had backed away from the position they related to him earlier, which was that the phrase "learn to code" itself constituted abusive behavior.

      So tweeting "learn to code" is not harassment. Tweeting it a thousand times would be. Tweeting "have a nice day" a thousand times would be, too. Whatever else is or is not harassment, this is just /. flamebait describing a complicated circumstance in a trivial way and then claiming a trivial act is being punished unfairly.

    2. Re:Covenginton by cavreader · · Score: 1

      I weep for the future. "learn to code" is just good career advice. It's good advice for those already coding and those wanting to start coding.

    3. Re:Covenginton by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Liberals tend to be more intolerant than conservatives. Those who shout and scream the most for "tolerance" are, in fact, the least tolerant among us...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Covenginton by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      thousand times to same guy or different guys?

      it's just solid advice..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we get it, your metrics are the important ones and deliberately misunderstanding and then covering your ears and asserting that you have no authority now is the way the Greek philosophers of old discovered inalienable truths

      or something like that

      Honestly though, is there someone out there you actually convince for more than a few minutes with this scrawl, and if you can... aren't they more effort to educate than to use?

    6. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So tweeting "learn to code" is not harassment. Tweeting it a thousand times would be.

      Except they aren't banning people who are tweeting that one thousand times, they are banning people who are tweeting it once, which is a lot less than the number of harassing Covington tweets some people have made.

    7. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conservatives don't have tolerance as a value, so your whining is political snarl and nothing more.

    8. Re:Covenginton by Jarwulf · · Score: 4, Informative

      They've banned people already for simply tweeting the phrase. They banned people simply for having the NPC meme in their profile. Cutting and pasting the spokeshole talking point doesn't make him wrong.

    9. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He says as he swings a noose around at the next Lynnwood Klan meeting.

    10. Re:Covenginton by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Twitter devs are just afraid of all that competition.

    11. Re:Covenginton by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well time for a bit of reality. Why is tweeting, 'learn to code to Journalists mean', well, it wasn't that long back I was in Uni and was forced to do computing 101, talk about a gimme subject, well, for some. For the computer literate and plus 125 crowd easy for the rest, well, they were Liberal arts students and struggled and that was it for computer coding for them, oh they wanted too alright, just that they couldn't. Seriously the fake social justice journos, were not journalists at all, just screaming social justice fakers, waffling divide and conquer propagandistic shite, really low class, writers. Those individuals are incapable of learning how to code, just they way it is, they have already tried and failed, hence taking up those fake journo roles, paid to bullshit, that they could do.

      Being a good journalists is hard work, they are incapable of it, coding is intellectual beyond them, don't be mean and do what they did to blue collar workers, those fake journos were dicks when they told blue colour workers to learn to code and this is the real reason, they are now being told to learn to code because they were being dicks when they did and now they don't like it.

      There was a moment in history, when those fake news rags, were a thing, pretend to be left, run all the left meaningless fluff pieces, identity shite and the rest and when it came to real polices, economic, foreign etc. all far right, backing the corporations all the way, either by censoring negative information or straight up lying.

      So the charade failed over time, people realised only fluff pieces came from the left and they hard right backed the corporations on real issues every single time and people abandoned them because they were fake, lying, scummy cunts who purposefully set up those media sites as shams, appear left as camouflage whilst being far right corporatists in reality, all done for profit and fuck the rest of humanity.

      Fuck those fake arse, lying quisling stooges, they were not journalists, they were divide and conquer quislings for the shadow government and they didn't work that well, they did not shift public opinion enough for the public to wish to enslave itself to the corporations and they are being fired. My message to them, not learn to code, learn to eat the bullshit you tried to feed to us.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But those kids were white so you know their racist like all of the rest of their kind.

      Twitter is a private company so all of this talk of censoring them is treason especially when the NRA does it for Russia. They are training school shooters for Putin.

    13. Re: Covenginton by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      'Thanks liberals for letting us know how "tolerant" you all are.'

      Those people are not liberals. They are corporate progressives. They hate real liberals just as much as they hate everything else.

    14. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's actually a lot of evidence of those screaming for tolerance are the least tolerant. Take saying "Merry Christmas" as an example. Those that are offended by it are offended because they're intolerant of Christians. If you move to a community that is 90% Christian, you should expect that those people will be outwardly displaying their culture. Those that are intolerant of the culture they knowingly inserted themselves in, decide to call the majority intolerant for not giving up their own identities to appease the minority. A minority, that doesn't want to be exposed to a different culture than their own. Yet they expect to be able to keep all their own customs and culture. The SJW self pity squad then sides with the real intolerants because they feel better when they belittle themselves. It's a mental illness.

    15. Re: Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because the leading cause of deaths in the black community is not gun violence, it's lynchings.

      But nice try at race bating, out of work sjw journo by chance?

    16. Re: Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you say so?

      I uphold everyone's right to free speech and free expression, the left gets their titties in a twist when someone uses the word "bossy" or wears a Halloween costume.

    17. Re:Covenginton by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Tweeting "Learn to code" is harassment.

      Well, no. Even TFS admits that the headline is bullshit.

      It can be part of a sustain harassment campaign, sure. Get thousands of followers to tweet it at the target. But on its own? No.

      It's worrying that people can't see the difference between a genuinely helpful suggestion made in good faith and trolling. Apparently Twitter can, but TFA seems to be being obtuse to make a non-story into something.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but those kids were wearing Trump hats. So that makes it okay to throw any journalistic ethics or standards out the window.

    19. Re:Covenginton by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People are being banned for tweeting "learn to code" just once. It's just a lot of people have offered the same advice. And not only to journalists.

      And of course this meme didn't come from no where: it's the exact advice these journalists gave to laid-off coal miners a few years ago. So, it's fine when the left dishes it out, but banworthy when the left receives it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He says as he swings a noose around at the next Lynnwood Klan meeting.

      The clan was the activist arm of the Democrats in the South. The Antifa of its day. Democrats are the party of slavery. Democrats are the party of the KKK. Democrats are the party of Jim Crow.

    21. Re:Covenginton by lgw · · Score: 1

      Get thousands of followers to tweet it at the target.

      Do you know what a meme is? No one was coordinating this. Thousands of people just found the same joke funny. Journalists were telling laid off coal miners to "learn to code" just a few years ago, let's give them their own advice now. Karma is such a bitch.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Covenginton by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But it's bad advice to someone who has no aptitude or affinity to coding. We already have enough cargo-cult programmers that can do barely more than copy/paste code from stackexchange.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Covenginton by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Technically, so is religion. The only reason religion does not fit the clinical description of delusion is that is explicitly exempt.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:Covenginton by Spamalope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Haven't journalists been (as at least a rough paraphrase) saying 'learn to code' whenever blue collar jobs are lost, so this is really a 'lets see how you like your own medicine' type of response?

    25. Re:Covenginton by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If it's just memes posted unprompted the fine, go ahead. They do kinda deserve it and it's completely fair. Wouldn't dispute that.

      And neither would Twitter I think, given the response they gave in TFA.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:Covenginton by rundgong · · Score: 1

      Isn't this a bit like a DDoS attack though?
      Everyone is doing something that by itself *looks* innocent, but if you look at the aggregate for the receiver it is clear that it is not.

      If they have already received 783 tweets with "learn to code", nobody with good intentions will send the same exact "career advice" again.

    27. Re:Covenginton by sheramil · · Score: 2

      Tweeting "Learn to code" is harassment.

      How about tweeting "Learn to write"? I swear, if I see another blog entry masquerading as "journalism" that starts with "HAY GUESS WAT?", I will punch someone, not an easy task for an habitual loner.

    28. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They found it funny because it IS funny! Nothing more amusing than having some pompous know it all assholes getting fed what they are dishing out. Schadenfreude can be a nice thing sometimes. I'm not on Twitter, nor do I read/use it, but I would be hard tempted to not leave a similar comment on some journalists feed too, just for the fun of it.

    29. Re:Covenginton by houghi · · Score: 0

      As you specifically excluded women, it will be seen as harassment against women. At least by some.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    30. Re:Covenginton by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I weep for the future. "learn to code" is just good career advice.

      There are already programmers sitting around unemployed right now because it's cheaper to hire someone else. I don't think that it is good career advice. Going into psych is probably the best plan, there's a ton of people who want to be reassured that things aren't as bad as they really are.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re: Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No True Scotsman fallacy.

      Literally EVERY person from the left were running each other over to call for these kids to be jailed/beaten/killed. Sorry to point it out to you but... corporate progressive = liberal. I'm sure you don't like it, but when you sit there quietly as they take over because they are calling for violent attacks against people you don't like, you support them. You had been given plenty of opportunities to call for stopping of them, but since they were saying stuff you agreed with, you are now with them.

      There are no liberals, of your definition, anymore. Only a hate group of progressives that call for beatings of high school kids for wearing red hats, and you are one of them.

    32. Re:Covenginton by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Liberals tend to be more intolerant than conservatives.

      Your link neither shows that, nor claims to. It speaks only to political intolerance, i.e. intolerance of political views. But liberals are more tolerant of literally everything else than conservatives. Pay attention!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re: Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please cite evidence that god doesnt exist.

    34. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you understood anything about philosophy you'd realize just how wrong a statement that was.

    35. Re:Covenginton by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      You don't know that, because Twitter doesn't explain the precise reasoning behind the ban.

      When you look at these accounts you inevitably find them flirting with getting banned over and over again until something finally got them booted, at which point they claim it was the most trivial thing they ever did and nothing to do with all the other shitposting.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    36. Re:Covenginton by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is bridge too far. You are assuming that Twitter has resources to monitor on-going behavior and make a complex and nuanced "body of work" determinations for a massive amount of people. Do you have any idea how expensive such moderation would be to implement?

      Instead, I propose that simpler explanation is that Twitter bans people arbitrary, based on instances of snowflake meltdowns and reporting backed up by a hasty review by ideologically-driven moderators that results in very clear anti-conservative bias.

    37. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tweeting "Learn to code" is harassment.

      If above is harassment, where do I report the same about all those people telling me that I should develop soft skills, emotional intelligence, and so on?
      My intelligence is fine, thank you. Whining is not a constructive behavior.
      Shut up and soldier!

    38. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma is such a bitch

      Those people should extend their quotes vocabulary.
      Journalists can always eat the cake.

      Simple file for fortune program and we have eloquent and unique entries ...
      I like "We do not sow" motto.

    39. Re:Covenginton by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 0

      You should acquaint yourself with the basic facts of the story instead of relying on Reason Magazine. The "learn to code" shit was included in a barrage of death threats from 4chan users. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/t...

    40. Re: Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you're dumb.

    41. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But it's bad advice to someone who has no aptitude or affinity to coding"

      Fucking 8-year olds can learn some goddamned basic ladder logic and be programming conveyor lines for $60K a year. If adult journalists with a better education can't do that, then they're simply fucked.

    42. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather dress up in the most homo-erotic outfit I could muster and prance around the most conservative part of the country than wear a MAGA hat in any bastion of the left like SF, NY, or LA.

      In one instance, I fear I will be physically attacked and harassed. In the other, I might get some jeers and scowling looks.

      Tolerant my ass.

    43. Re:Covenginton by penandpaper · · Score: 2, Funny

      *looks left, right, and behind*
      *clears throat*

      HAY GUESS WAT!!!!!

      *Runs*

    44. Re:Covenginton by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In one instance, I fear I will be physically attacked and harassed. In the other, I might get some jeers and scowling looks.

      Guess you were never a Top Gear fan. The South has a long history of violence which you're willfully ignoring, and their intolerance and violence persist to this day. Are you a total idiot, or a useful idiot? There's no third option.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the biggest point to realize from this post is that it's damn easy to fake your way through journalism. So long as you're sensational enough and get enough clicks, you don't actually have to be any good at your job and you can bullshit your entire way through your career.

      When you're coding, on the other hand, people will spot how shitty you are in less than a week. You can't just bullshit your way through a coding job, at least not nearly as easily. Bullshitting your way through a coding job is technically possible, but you need a lot of skill to begin with if you're going to play the corporate game and be a successful BOFH.

    46. Re:Covenginton by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Why would they have to do on-going monitoring when they can just look back at the account's history?

      I would assume they have some kind of control panel where they can see the tweet history, complaint history and any notes made by other moderators.

      It's far from perfect but also far from arbitrary.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    47. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attacking racist kids that attacked a Native person after being attacked by a different racist group is not okay.

    48. Re:Covenginton by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      ALL 8 year olds independent of whether it interests them or whether they think a dump is what they do in the toilet?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    49. Re: Covenginton by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      When trying to show that certain things are and certain things are not, there are only two possible starting points: Either assuming that nothing is until you show its existence, or assuming that everything is possible until shown to be impossible.

      I would suggest the former starting point. Especially if religious, and twice so if monotheistic. Else you're facing the problem of disproving the existence of Ra, Thor, Allah, Krishna, Jehova, Hanuman, Baal Hammon, Toutatis, Xipe Totec, Ashur, Sol Invictus, ...

      Of course you may leave out whatever deity you happen to worship.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    50. Re:Covenginton by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So please elaborate on the difference between a delusion, a cult and a religion, aside of the number of afflicted.

      Imagine there was no Judaism (or Christianity for that matter), what would you say to someone who tells you that he believes that there is an invisible being that watches every step he does, has some rather bizarre rules to judge you by and will torture you for eternity after you die if you, say, eat shellfish, wear two different fabrics at the same time or eat a cheeseburger?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    51. Re:Covenginton by tungstencoil · · Score: 1

      "But it's bad advice to someone who has no aptitude or affinity to coding"

      Fucking 8-year olds can learn some goddamned basic ladder logic and be programming conveyor lines for $60K a year. If adult journalists with a better education can't do that, then they're simply fucked.

      I find it difficult to believe that you actually believe this. At least, I hope not.

      Let's break it down, just in case you do... All 8-year-olds? Nope. Basic ladder logic as a (complete, holistic, everything-you-can-do) skill in demand enough to say that it's a viable on its own? Nope.

      How about a little more? Would people with these... ahem... minimal skills make their way into the "non-conveyor-line" market? Probably. Do we see enough "Learn to Code in X weeks!"-type folks flooding the market? Yup. Assuming you're in tech, do you work with some miserable person who can barely but adequately cobble together some cut-and-paste functionality and send it down the pipe, only to have it cause problems later? Probably.

      No, 'learn to code' isn't appropriate for everyone. It's not a floor measurement for people's aptitude in life or the job market in general. Different people are good at different things. Is this really that difficult?

    52. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Learn to code" is a response to all of the times media has written a story about the plight of people losing their jobs to automation or economic upheaval and suggested the people involved simply "learn to code."

      It is the culture gestalt saying to them: Your lack of empathy is now coming back to haunt you.

      Twitter is showing it's agenda colors if it threatens to ban people who are merely pointing out that what goes around comes around, while refusing to ban people who threaten physical violence against anyone not in their own little group of left wingers.

    53. Re: Covenginton by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a large group of liberals in the U.S. And they are getting tired of the radical progressive left, which is why all of these "journalist" are out of work now. Real liberals have discovered what the right has known all along. You can't work with progressives. They are intolerant, they don't compromise, in all ways they eat their young, figuratively speaking. They're bad for the country and holding back real reform in a number of areas

      I specifically monitor more than a few real liberal journalists. They quickly pointed out that the Covington kids were set up by people who edited the video and a know liar. They called out the major media who passed the story along and called out the SJW haters that were inciting violence against innocent high schooners.

      They were, of course, mostly ignored by mainstream media, until the right wing started to report the same thing. Because when people are getting the same facts from both liberals and conservatives it becomes obvious the MSM is in bed with the progressives and untrustworthy. So people stop going to the progressive sites and MSM for news. They aren't going to go to the right wing media either. So the radical left wing sites are dying and more moderate liberals are creating their own news sites on YouTube and online, where they can find news they can trust to be factual.

    54. Re: Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the one you replied to.
      I did NOT see "right wing" media attacking the kids (disclaimer, I don't watch nearly all of those outlets). So you are lying right there. In fact Fox News is about the only people I did not see calling for violence against the kids.

      If you think the rest of the progressives have ruined things for "liberals", then why haven't you or anyone done anything about it? I'll tell you why. They call Trump and his supporters racists, you know it is a lie but it suits your purposes. You gave them a pass, over and over and over. Congratulations, you are now one of them according to the rest of us. I don't see a single liberal standing up for the kids, even after it was clearly shown they were not doing anything wrong. Why? They wore red hats. And them being attacked is ok with you, because you don't like them.

      Liberals, after talking to them for a long time to see why they are different than me, I have it come down to a SINGLE issue (it is that simple). Liberals believe the government's main responsibility is to punish people they don't like. That's the single plank of liberalism. The different wings of liberalism is just disagreement on who should be in punished group, but you all believe it. Everything else is just an attempt at justification.

      The rest of us think the written law should be enforced. If you didn't break a law, the government shouldn't punish you.

      That's the difference between me and you. You support oppression/censorship of people you don't like even if it is illegal. You claim different but your actions don't show that.

    55. Re:Covenginton by sinij · · Score: 1

      You contradicting yourself. If they have "any notes made by other moderators", then this fits definition of on-going monitoring. If they have single "incident" and then they dig through history to justify bans, then it is arbitrary enforcement.

    56. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was never advice; it was mocking, contemptuous dismissal of blue-collar workers losing their livelihoods. So of course when it got flipped around on these piece of shit journalists, the weak faggots at twitter called it harassment because "there are no bad tactics, only bad targets." Twitter's only rule for silencing an account is "does this person commit wrongthink?" Anyone who claims otherwise is a fucking retard or a liar, and likely both.

    57. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >some rather bizarre rules to judge you by

      Like making it okay to violently assault and attempt to murder people for wearing a red hat?

    58. Re: Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >real liberal journalists quickly pointed out that the Covington kids were set up

      [citation fucking needed]
       
      Or maybe we can just file this under "Shit that never happened."
       
      Captcha: quantify

    59. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow Mississippi doesn't have laws that LGBTQUPOIDSFSLDKFSDLJ activists like that means they will get beaten up for walking down the street!

      The places with more liberals become violent to anyone not of the same scum and villainy.

    60. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making shit up to justify attacks against children is even worse.

    61. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting thing about religion. When people in an fMRI think about their religious things, the areas of the brain responsible for emotion, self-representation, and cognitive conflict light up.That's why, when you tell someone their invisible friend doesn't exist, they are experiencing the cognitive dissonance of knowing you're right but refusing to admit it, become angry, and feel you're attacking them personally.

    62. Re:Covenginton by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Not from on-going monitoring, from prior user-submitted complaints. Maybe they have been banned or asked to delete tweets before, that kind of thing.

      Why don't you go look through some of the people who threatened/demanded/doxed the Covington kids. Many of them have very long histories of abusive actions(open threats, doxing, harassment, stalking, etc) of other people, that have been reported to twitter and twitter has done nothing. The sad fact is you can without much trouble find user reports against those accounts where twitter "didn't find any ToS violations." All it really says is that the people who investigate these abusive cases are perfectly fine with some types of abuse if they're 'against the right kind ideological enemies.' The current game of TERF vs non-TERF is a good example of this if you want to see it in action.

      But one only has to take a look over the last 4 years to see what's happened. If you don't fall in line with the current progressive groupthink, twitter will come after your account for the smallest infraction. Even if you're directly quoting some progressive threatening, harassing and/or doxing someone. But leave the original tweets up.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    63. Re:Covenginton by sinij · · Score: 2

      I disagree with you fundamentally, and I think that trying to convince you that this is a serious ongoing issue with dire downstream societal consequences is futile as you are too closely ideologically aligned with Twitter to clearly see the issue.

      Consider the following hypothetical situation. In an alternative universe Twitter was invented during Jim Crow period and is controlled by "Southern Strategy" types. These people are using biased moderation, shadow banning and so on to enforce their agenda.
      Two questions: 1) can you identify anything in how Twitter currently governed or operates that would make that scenario impossible 2) What would you change (e.g. laws, ToS) that would mitigate the worst abuses ?

    64. Re:Covenginton by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      They've banned people already for simply tweeting the phrase.

      Then it isn't "they might", now is it?

      Cutting and pasting the spokeshole talking point doesn't make him wrong.

      Cutting and pasting his talking point neither makes him wrong nor makes him right. It IS the point of the article, however. Twitter is not saying they might punish people just for tweeting "learn to code", they are saying they won't treat it as 'abusive behaviour'. It contradicts the headline, and the summary contains nothing that supports a claim of "might" -- future tense possibility.

    65. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people are barely journalists. Please stay away from coding.

    66. Re:Covenginton by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      Being willfully ignorant about an event that was part of a national discussion for days, and then lying about it on message boards is not okay.

      The kids weren't racist, and they "Native person" attacked them (in the sense that he aggressively moved into their space . . . and getting in someone's face and beating a drum is agressive...as well as weird).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    67. Re:Covenginton by sheramil · · Score: 1

      (pleading) at least tell me you know what the inverted pyramid lead is!

    68. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The unemployed programmers are not be looking very hard for a job. Flexibility and the will to improve or learn new skills are the keys to landing a good programmer or other IT related job. Just hit one of the larger job sites and see the thousands of jobs out there. Every permutation of skillset and location create a lot of choices. I would go as far as saying that someone who cannot find a job is not worth hiring no matter how good their skillset is. You can be the best programmer in the world but without some basic common sense you most likely won't find a job and that is all on you.

      FYI. If you are after big money brush up on your C++, C, RPG, Cobol, or any other legacy platforms that still have a large footprint in today's IT systems.

    69. Re:Covenginton by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Sigh. Mashiki and his sock puppets arrived and started modding.

      Ask me again when he goes away.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    70. Re:Covenginton by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If you can hate the sin and love the sinner, why don't you think I can hate the religion and love the religious?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    71. Re:Covenginton by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That sounds interesting, where is it permitted to assault someone wearing a red hat with the intent to murder?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    72. Re:Covenginton by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      If you left the comment on the feed of a journalist who said that about the miners, I might laugh at that; "just desserts" can be rewarding, as we see time and again in movies.

      If you left that comment on the feed of a journalist who never said that, I think that's being a jerk. It's a mistake to hold person A responsible for the actions of person B when person A had nothing to do with it, even if they share the same label.

      And if you were a coal miner who got fired, saw that reporter B made a comment about learning to code, then got fired...and you offered sympathy to reporter B instead of throwing their words back at them? You would have my admiration and respect. Okay, might not mean much if you're unemployed, but tweeting "Learn to code" at someone isn't going to help your employment status, anyway.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    73. Re:Covenginton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drink! AmiMojo changing the topic to avoid having to actually engage in a conversation (that he would probably complain later how we don't have any productive conversation)!
      Drink again for AmiMojo blaming sock puppets (or trolls, or triggered right wing snowflakes, because insults and labels are ok when he does it!). That's right AmiMojo, find some nebulous poorly defined group of people like Trumpsters blame SJWs!

      (say, wouldn't his sock puppet conspiracy theory of his means that if /. ran by Twitter's rules, HE would be the banned? I mean, if we looked at AmiMojo's "history", he has a lot of downvotes and reports of being a flamebait troll)

    74. Re:Covenginton by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 1

      Seems like you're just annoyed because he's 100% correct and additionally your broadly general links don't really prove shit about his specific scenario (in fact both are unhelpful to your argument if you actually were to bother to read them). Furthermore you sound like a partisan shill, looking to blow smoke and create distractions when the truth is pretty clear to any non-partisan with a smidge of common sense.

    75. Re:Covenginton by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Mashiki and his sock puppets arrived and started modding.

      Gotta be about the most childish thing I've read from a person who claims they're an adult in the last year. Maybe it's time for you to realize that your views are inherently regressive and people have had enough. Besides, if I actually had more then one account I could access...I'd be posting with my 4-UID one that I lost years ago when AT&T Canada shutdown.

      Ask me again when he goes away.

      Or, you could ask yourself the hard question: "Are my views really so backwards that the majority of people disagree with me?" But that requires introspection, and questioning one's own point of view. Something that you refuse to do even when proof is laid out right in front of you.

      You're going to have to grow up sometime or another, and going by the state of the UK. You'd be better off doing it now.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    76. Re:Covenginton by sinij · · Score: 1

      You're going to have to grow up sometime or another, and going by the state of the UK. You'd be better off doing it now.

      In modern society there is absolutely no requirement to have your worldviews to have any kind of predictive power or even correlation with reality. As long as you don't get into toxic cleansing or extreme diets like frutarian.

      My prediction that AmiMojo will continue living happily disconnected life by masterfully avoiding cognitive dissonance of his strange views.

    77. Re:Covenginton by sinij · · Score: 1

      Ask me again when he goes away.

      I read at -1 and will see your replies regardless of moderation.

    78. Re:Covenginton by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      He says as he swings a noose around at the next Lynnwood Klan meeting.

      The clan was the activist arm of the Democrats in the South. The Antifa of its day. Democrats are the party of slavery. Democrats are the party of the KKK. Democrats are the party of Jim Crow.

      That's a cool story, but do you have anything that isn't say, fifty years out of date?

    79. Re:Covenginton by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      Do you know what a meme is? No one was coordinating this.

      Memes aimed at one person by thousands are harassment.

  5. Twats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit is... fucking ridiculous

  6. Manners, people! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Learn to code!...please?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Manners, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they will write fake code.

  7. Well... by TimMD909 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... If they learned to code, they'd better understand the algorithms they tried to exploit with rage for more views... Jus' sayin'...

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I heard, they are all into JavaScript programming now.

  8. What? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    This is a policy that only applies to laid-off journalists?
    I feel like I'm missing something here.

    1. Re:What? by mukinrestak · · Score: 5, Informative

      You probably need the context then. Recently an arseload of mostly left-leaning journalists from left-leaning websites got laid-off (specifically Huffington Post and that bastion of integrity and probity Buzzfeed). Right wing Twitter users thought back to when Obama told laid-off coal miners that they should just learn to code, and decided that what's good for the goose is good for the gander. They then proceeded to start mocking the laid-off journalists with the same advice. The left-leaning journalists got their feefees hurt and started whining to mummy Twitter to make the mean words stop.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's kinda funny though

      when people who don't have the capacity to code tweet that to people who already can code and are too busy congratulating themselves to realise that they're just bad at recon

      let's just say there are some circles in which this whole thing is being received in a rather more amused light.

    3. Re:What? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did Obama really say that? I can't find a reference to it and it's an uncharacteristically dumb thing to say

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he had a program for it and everything: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/the-obama-administration-idea-to-save-coal-country-214885

    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right wing Twitter users thought back to when Obama told laid-off coal miners that they should just learn to code, and decided that what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

      "President Obama has, as part of his Power Plus Plan, already put $75 million on the table for retraining coal workers. And the Solar Training Network aims to help train 75,000 people for solar jobs by 2020, though that is not limited to retraining programs, or to helping coal workers specifically." -- Can We Really Retrain Coal Workers for Jobs in Solar

      The least you could do is get your talking point memes right. Clearly Obama is a socialist who wants to prop up the solar industry with subsidies for coal miners by offering up tax payer money. The bastard! If Obama had wanted people to code, he'd push for it in schools (where he did) and suggest everyone should learn to code (not specifically for a job but as a general skill of the future). The bastard!

      Seriously, if anything you could complain about the left-wing media mocking the notion that coal workers could be retrained. And assholes like Bloomberg saying, “You’re not going to teach a coal miner to code.” -- Can You Teach a Coal Miner to Code, but I can see how you could confuse Bloomberg saying *not* to coding with Obama saying something about solar and offering money for retraining.

      Having said that, Bloomberg was right to say, “Mark Zuckerberg says you teach them to code and everything will be great. I don’t know how to break it to you . but no.” It's not per se a lack of jobs but getting enough people trained in the right things...and rampant ageism in the industry. Mark Zuckerberg, of course, just wants everyone to code so he can get cheaper workers because of a glut in supply. The media is pretty useless because it doesn't know where the future is going to even know if retraining coal miners for coding, solar, or whatever would actually benefit them.

      But, yea, if you want to say there's some goose that's good for the gander, I would say there's some truth to it. It's clearly, though, harassment then. It's not people trying to offer sound advice. If you want to offer assistance to journalists to learn to code, that'd be a whole other thing. Clearly, though, you just want to rub it in because you apparently hate journalists. Perhaps you hate them as much as you hate coal miners.

    6. Re:What? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whether Obama said it or not, the sentiment has been around for a while.

      A lot of people there were really optimistic that the solution to technological unemployment was to teach unemployed West Virginia truck drivers to code so they could participate in the AI revolution. I used to think this was a weird straw man occasionally trotted out by Freddie deBoer, but all these top economists were *super enthusiastic* about old white guys whose mill has fallen on hard times founding the next generation of nimble tech startups.

      http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/02/06/notes-from-the-asilomar-conference-on-beneficial-ai/

      It's a hard-hearted lack of sympathy. Working class stiffs from Middle America get told to fuck off and learn to code because the coasts are eliminating their jobs with globalism.

      When I was young, most people in the upper half were perfectly willing to respect those in the bottom half, and some people (leftists) practically worshipped them. Today, it is vastly different. Remarks calling working class "deplorables" and worse have become quite common today on the left. Leftists say that working class are racist, misogynistic, intolerant, etc. In reality, they are the bigots and not middle America.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. All in the Family was set in NYC, because there was no counterpart in the flyover states.

    8. Re:What? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      They're not being told to fuck off, they're being given opportunities to retrain for better jobs. I don't remember Obama saying "learn to code" but I do remember him talking about retraining coal miners for factory jobs. Trump isn't doing anything for appalachia and those jobs are going away at some point anyway.

      And when HRC talks about deplorables she's not talking about coal miners, she's talking about coal-rollers -> those douchebags who make their pickups extra pollutey so they can trigger liberals. Nobody is saying it's all of middle america but yes you have some real assholes among you.

    9. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except she said ALL Trump Supporters, which was roughly half the country.

      Basket of Deplorables.
      You don't get to sweep that under the rug for her, she gets to own that forever.

    10. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that link proves shit, you fucking moron. Here's another link: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FOAD

    11. Re:What? by lgw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, she was call all Trump supporters, roughly half the country, the Nazi sympathising fringe of the Alt-right. That was very much understood, and won't soon be forgotten.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:What? by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just political handwaving. It's been the standard attitude among economists all along. They've been cheerleading offshoring and other rapid deindustrialization with a message that boils down to people will get better jobs, like coding.

      I mean, they're probably right in the long term / macroeconomic perspective (we can have the AI/unemployment/basic income debate later), but almost none of them acknowledged that most existing workers losing their jobs will wind up with worse employment or none at all. I'm aware of almost no economist who supported taxing the corporate windfall of offshoring/H1Bs to support job training or other long-term support programs. It was an ignored problem, probably because to question it was to second guess the economic righteousness of free markets.

      IMHO, the biggest failing of economics is its perverse desire to be seen as a science devoid of politics or social impact. It ends up becoming a tone-deaf cheerleader for corporate policies.

    13. Re:What? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      So a coal mining man with calloused, bearpaw hands is going to sit in front of a computer and compete with Achmed and Nasheem for IT jobs?

      Assholes among us, eh? A single car making pollution? Tell me, how many in middle America get to craft industrial policies that harm the planet? How many wars did we start? That's all on you, assholes. And you're getting ready for another war in Venezuela. Good job, I'm sure that will totally turn out just as well as it did for you in Iraq.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:What? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2

      That would be a pretty big basket. I think you are going out of your way to misinterpret a simple sentence.

    15. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did not but he offered something like 14m in funds to help all the fired miners. I guess the 'learn to code'was a bad joke some leftists and greens had over the possibly right wing meaning miners.

    16. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're trying to gas light the situation pretty hard here. It was well documented. Would you like me to google it for you?

      https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/11/us/politics/hillary-clinton-basket-of-deplorables.html

      I know that you have to try to revise history pretty hard to be able to live with yourself, but come on, this is easy to disprove. The only hard part was which source to I choose. The BBC, NYT, WaPo. I figure NYT would be hard for you to discount as "reliable".

      In all fairness it wasn't all Trump supporters, just half of them.

    17. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she's talking about coal-rollers -> those douchebags who make their pickups extra pollutey so they can trigger liberals

      Bull-fucking-shit.

      “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” HRC

    18. Re:What? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Ok, now you're so all over the place I can't even tell which side you're on.
      Maybe you're beefing with the voices in your head?

    19. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    20. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm,
      to reverse this closer, learning to code is not good enough.
      That is still "office job" with delicate hands taping keyboards.

      I would propose ,
      learn to lay bricks and pour the concrete ... there is plenty of job opening at the southern border... :-)
      or ...
      join the Army/Navy/Marines .. and se the world outside your sheltered neighborhood.

    21. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?"

      No, she didn't call "all Trump supporters" deplorable, but she did day half of them. So almost 25% of the voters. That's still a very big basket that is much larger than the actual virulent racists.

    22. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in the Election, only 20% of the population voted for Trump. 60% voted "no confidence" so really only 1/5 of the population is a Basket of Deplorables.

    23. Re:What? by lgw · · Score: 1

      BBC, NYT, WaPo.

      Were there any reliable sources, or only the propaganda arms of the Establishment?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep telling yourself that. We'll see in a year and a half.

    25. Re:What? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yes, she was call all Trump supporters, roughly half the country, the Nazi sympathising fringe of the Alt-right.

      This is one lie after another.

      1. She didn't call all Trump supporters deplorables. She said about half of them were.
      2. She was specifically talking about Trump supporters, not Republicans in general.
      3. Even then Republicans make up a small percentage of the electorate.

      The full quote was:

      You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trumpâ(TM)s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic - you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people - now how 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks â" they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America. But the other basket - and I know this because I see friends from all over America here - I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas - as well as, you know, New York and California - but that other basket of people are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and theyâ(TM)re just desperate for change. It doesnâ(TM)t really even matter where it comes from. They donâ(TM)t buy everything he says, but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They wonâ(TM)t wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroine, feel like theyâ(TM)re in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.

      There is literally no way to read it as making any generalizations about ALL REPUBLICANS, or even ALL TRUMP SUPPORTERS. You have to be functionally a moron to take away that interpretation.

      Are you a moron, or are you lying because it's easier to lie than admit the person you've been taught to hate since 1992 might have been right about something?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    26. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live on the coast. I lost a job to automation several times. You know what I did? Found a different job/got more education. Not cried into my beer for 10, 20, 30 years as time passed me by.

      The people called "deplorables" were, as Hillary Clinton described them, the 50% of the Trump base that were "“the racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

      She said the other half of Trump’s supporters “feel that the government has let them down” and are “desperate for change.”

      “Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well,” she said.

    27. Re:What? by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 1

      Neither truth nor opinion must cleave cleanly along partisan lines. Sometimes one needs to parse what is there and quit trying to peg someone as right or left so as to use the standard tropes as reflexive responses. Thinking > Partisanship. He didn't have to "beef" with anyone to make some statements of opinion. Free thought doesn't always read like a partisan stump speech.

    28. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a hard-hearted lack of sympathy. Working class stiffs from Middle America get told to fuck off and learn to code because tehe coasts are eliminating their jobs with globalism.

      Didn't realize that all these States were on the coasts. Meanwhile "in the heartland", automation of factory jobs is being sparked by factories "in the heartland". Funny how you're unwilling to blame the factory owner, operator, or manager. But, yea, it's all "globalism"'s fault. It actually is. There's no sort of solution to that problem except retraining people in new jobs.

      When I was young, most people in the upper half were perfectly willing to respect those in the bottom half, and some people (leftists) practically worshipped them. Today, it is vastly different. Remarks calling working class "deplorables" and worse have become quite common today on the left. Leftists say that working class are racist, misogynistic, intolerant, etc. In reality, they are the bigots and not middle America.

      Here's a hint. There's no longer an "upper half". There's an "upper 5%". Most of them aren't leftist or rightist. They're centrist assholes who think because they've got money, they did things right. They leave the bottom 80% fighting each other with name calling. They all play up the notion that if only they worked harder, smarter, etc they'd suddenly be part of the top 10%. Of course, the "upper 5%" are piddly poor compared to the actually rich upper 10-15%.

      But, please keep spinning it being about racism, intolerance, etc. The truth is it's all about jobs. It's about jobs that don't even exist yet, and yes learning to code might be a way out for a lot of people. It also may be a dead end. We honestly don't know where the future will lead, but we do know that offering money for retraining and trying to get growth industries on-board is about the only path forward. We won't go back to having tons of factory jobs or coal mines. Whatever the future is, it involves retraining a lot of people to do a lot of things you apparently think these many blue collar workers can't do. The truth is, for most the work, they can.

    29. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Obama was super-smart, what with the corpse-men and 57 states.

      Just another fraud.

  9. Abusive Behaviour by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should just re-label "abusive behaviour" to "whatever we don't like, whenever we don't like it"

    Trash journalists didn't seem to care when blue collar workers were losing their jobs. Besides, everyone should learn how to code, learn how to file their taxes, learn to cook, learn CPR...

    1. Re:Abusive Behaviour by alexo · · Score: 1

      Besides, everyone should learn how to code, learn how to file their taxes, learn to cook, learn CPR...

      "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyse a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."
      — Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love

    2. Re:Abusive Behaviour by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "They should just re-label "abusive behaviour" to "whatever we don't like, whenever we don't like it""

      It's actually "whatever costs us money", which is why corporations are poor stewards without exception. Trump violates Twitter's ToS almost every time he twats (deliberate fraud, harassment, incitement of violence...) but they'll never terminate his account because it makes them more important. And all because they are beholden to stockholders.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Abusive Behaviour by syn3rg · · Score: 1

      +1
      My favorite Heinlein quote.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    4. Re:Abusive Behaviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does not make any of that true.

    5. Re:Abusive Behaviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's actually "whatever costs us money"

      No, it's whatever hurts the delicate fee-fees of the pozzed left-wing communist faggots at twitter. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can look and see it for themselves. Obviously this excludes retards/paid shills such as yourself. What are you up to now, $0.25 a post?

    6. Re:Abusive Behaviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to ban Twitter for Abusive Behavior.

    7. Re:Abusive Behaviour by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      No, to ban Trump under some misbegotten guideline reason effectively puts them in the position of quasi-censoring political speech, the most important free speech of all. And coming from the president, like him or not.

      "We're hiding from you what th president is saying because we don't like it" is not a bragging point for a speech-based company.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:Abusive Behaviour by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Yet people know how to read, shower, put on clothes and turn on the TV. Why are TV controllers not a career path? Millions of people need to turn on their TV on a daily basis.

  10. Don't want the helpful advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fine, learn to suck cock then.

    1. Re:Don't want the helpful advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they were doing in their "journalism" careers. It's why the mainstream media went completely down the shitter when they stopped doing any real investigative work, and instead just whored themselves out to the highest bidders.

    2. Re:Don't want the helpful advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for Zoe Quinn when she realized her coding skills were shit.

    3. Re:Don't want the helpful advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1...

  11. Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AOK by Jarwulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can tweet about feeding kids into a woodchipper or giving blowjobs to punch kids in the face or dox kids all day long or do any of the threatening and calls to violence that the antiMAGA crowd almost entirely got away with a few days ago and are still widely and proudly unapologetic for but tweeting 'learn to code' is going too far!

    1. Re:Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AOK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah it did take them ages to get rid of that Cernovich guy after he said that stuff, didn't it? And also that Yani guy or whatever his name was...

      you'd think these super smart people would know that the 'delete tweet' button isn't the same as removing the tweet from the databases and logs, huh?
      and that anyone can punch a phrase into google these days...

      and that we control the logs, and your desire to have had us alter them to your detriment presumes you're important enough to notice.

  12. These are the same people by Crashmarik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That told coal miners "Get a Uhaul and learn to code"

    Seems they really don't like having that thrown in their face.

    1. Re: These are the same people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than losing a job because Trump promises are like raindrops in the snow.

      You just get your ass busted trying to catch them.

    2. Re:These are the same people by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That told coal miners "Get a Uhaul and learn to code"

      Seems they really don't like having that thrown in their face.

      I gotta say this very respectfully to everyone here:

      If you shit your pants because someone tells you to learn to code, be it MAGA People or thase commie journalists, or get spun up by either.

      The USA is ready to be invaded, and subsumed, because we've become a nation of utter weaklings, left or right. So many snowflakes - so precious, so fragile.

      Probably all those phytoestrogenes we've been eating.

      So everyone chillaxe, take a deep breath. Let's go get a beer.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:These are the same people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Wired, not Huffpost. Here's the article: https://www.wired.com/2015/11/can-you-teach-a-coal-miner-to-code/

      But like
      all journalists are the same right? they all stereotype and that's why we're in this mess right now amirite -_-

    4. Re:These are the same people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That told coal miners "Get a Uhaul and learn to code"

      Seems they really don't like having that thrown in their face.

      So I Googled for coal miner coding and found this.

      "Three years ago, Justice and Parrish got tired of watching out-of-work coal miners struggling to survive. So the owners of Jigsaw, a Pikeville, KY, excavation and engineering company, decided to start a new business--a software development company that would hire former miners in eastern Kentucky, first teaching them how to code."

      "Called Bit Source, the startup aims to help revitalize the local economy, while addressing what Justice calls “a brain drain” in the area, as unemployed residents move away. The company now employs nine ex-miners."

      There are startup businesses actively trying to employ out of work miners in the growing IT industry, a benefit to all involved, and you choose to read these articles as the media hates coal miners, something that can be thrown back in their face. How... stupid.. are you.

    5. Re:These are the same people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That told coal miners "Get a Uhaul and learn to code"

      Seems they really don't like having that thrown in their face.

      I gotta say this very respectfully to everyone here:

      If you shit your pants because someone tells you to learn to code, be it MAGA People or thase commie journalists, or get spun up by either.

      The USA is ready to be invaded, and subsumed, because we've become a nation of utter weaklings, left or right. So many snowflakes - so precious, so fragile.

      Probably all those phytoestrogenes we've been eating.

      So everyone chillaxe, take a deep breath. Let's go get a beer.

      People used to get booted off AOL, IRC rooms, message boards, email lists for all sorts of silly reasons, and even Slashdot has a built-in friend/foe blacklist system on top of the user driven moderation.

      Then we had the rise of "Web scale" crap that was just too lazy/cheap to enforce any terms of service or community standards, and that's starting to snap back. It's not weakness, it's just things moving back to being more civil.

      Seriously, nobody owes anybody else a platform. If that IRC room didn't like the cut of your jib, you found another one, or got booted by a chan operator. The fact some people feel entitled to basically a chatroom full of millions of people is pretty fucking amazing in my opinion, and not grounded with reality. I want a fair, inclusive service for everyone, but Jesus H. Christ, you don't even pay for this stuff... go make your own, it's the fucking Internet, you got booted from a chat room, grow up.

    6. Re:These are the same people by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The fact some people feel entitled to basically a chatroom full of millions of people is pretty fucking amazing in my opinion, and not grounded with reality. I want a fair, inclusive service for everyone, but Jesus H. Christ, you don't even pay for this stuff... go make your own, it's the fucking Internet, you got booted from a chat room, grow up.

      Insightful. Having been around the internet a log time, I'm used to taking all manner of abuse. It's a big world, with all manner of people in it, with all manner of definitions of abuse. As you note, there can be millions in a room. Maybe I'm not the sharpest pencil in the box, but I do understand that there will be a lot of different opinions, and different levels of civility. What-freaking-ever.

      This whole article in Slashdot should be part of a psychological study. To me it just shows how horribly messed up a lot of people are. How utterly weak we have become.

      While the original "learn to code" was trolling, that's all it was - soundbyte type trolling. But some overly sensitive mod apparently got their panties in a bunch over it. Most likely someone who leans left on the PS. Whatever, the left has no monopoly on brittle inability to handle simple things. Cooler heads prevailed, however.

      But then the story comes here to Slashdot, and it turns out that the crypto-conservatives have a level of sensitivity at least as bad as the snowflake that caused the "Learn to Code" as abuse problem in the first place.

      Between the howaboutism, the product of weak minds that manages to do the exact opposite of what they think it is doing, and the peanut allergy level of inability to take any disagreement. We have a room full of sissies. I'm calling most out.

      Protip to both sides - If you're laid off and someone tells you to "learn to code", Thank them and tell them it is a good idea. If they were serious, they'll tell you no problem. If they were trolling you, you'll have played them and pissed them off. Nothing worse to do to a troll than play them with civility.

      Learn to code, y'all.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:These are the same people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe just follow the long-age adage of "if you can't take it, don't dish it."

      These journalists are just now realizing the gravity of the very words they threw at these people years ago.

    8. Re:These are the same people by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      So everyone chillaxe, take a deep breath. Let's go get a beer.

      Hah! Inviting me for a beer when you know that for "reasons" I am not allow to drink! I shall let you know that I will report you to this fine site's editors for harassment! </s>

    9. Re:These are the same people by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So everyone chillaxe, take a deep breath. Let's go get a beer.

      Hah! Inviting me for a beer when you know that for "reasons" I am not allow to drink! I shall let you know that I will report you to this fine site's editors for harassment! </s>

      Does this mean I have to be fired?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:These are the same people by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Or maybe just follow the long-age adage of "if you can't take it, don't dish it."

      These journalists are just now realizing the gravity of the very words they threw at these people years ago.

      You're playing the game, AC.

      Okay, let me illustrate how this works. You gloat about the journalists "learning their lesson"

      Someone chimes in with how butthurt the conservatives were when the Kenyan terror baby was elected, then how they went nuts the second time.

      Then someone notes how at least Dubya was honest.

      Then someone makes a Darth Cheney Dig

      Then someone will note that the Neocons are just Trotskyites

      Then someone will note about Bill Clinton being a lecher getting oral sex in the white house

      Then someone will mention how Trump grabs e'm by the Pussy and pays Pornoo actresses to shut their mouths

      Then someone will make fun of Bush 1's Read my lips and turning Broccoli into a bad thing.

      All the way back until conservatives are calling FDR a communist, and Liberals making fun of Hoobert Heever, and his great depression. Mixed in with the typical blurbs in between.

      What a bunch of sensitive little twerps! Y'all need red or blue Binky's

      I am guilty of trolling with various quips myself - thing is I don't take it seriously, like you and the other snowflakes. And it's weird when you do this. Libs think you're a crypto conservative, and crypto conservatives think you're a flaming lib.

      But they are all wrong. I'm just stirring the ant's nest with a stick, and enjoying watching the precious flowers come running out to stake their outrage.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:These are the same people by js290 · · Score: 1
      rent seeking journos...

      Twitter Rules: #LearnToCode is perfectly ok to say to #coalworkers when they get fired. #LearnToCode is a violation of Terms of Service if said to #journalists when they get fired.

      makes perfect sense.

      — Janie (@jbr485) January 28, 2019

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
  13. Well Obama is fucked by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Well Obama is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's in their tribe. Doesn't count.

    2. Re:Well Obama is fucked by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      So does posting that or links to NPR count as ban-able offenses on twitter now that a blessed group is affected?
      https://www.npr.org/sections/a...

  14. Poetic Justice, now a hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those poor journalists. Nah, im just kidding. Fuck em, let them burn together with their lies.

    1. Re: Poetic Justice, now a hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movie, reviews, other http://www.ajjplay.in or http://www.ajjplay.tk

      Best article https://thinkingfunda.com or http://thinkingfunda.in or http://bit.ly/tkgfda

      Best wishes msg http://www-happybirthday.in or http://bit.ly/2RXa7K0

      SEO tools cheapest price http://wpkeybuddy.com

      Best tools http://artpedia.tk

      Best plastic http://askmeplastic.com

    2. Re: Poetic Justice, now a hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason Sherman wanted to treat reporters like he treated Atlanta.

  15. Re: Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course. Twitter is an arm of the prog leftard commie asshole movement. It is not a revolution but more like the zombies on TWD. Anybody who uses Twitter should be drawn and quartered

  16. I'm currently banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Told one of the recently laid of journalists to enter a new career field and learn to code. I also n pointed out that her colleague who is in fact a coder was inundated with job offers publicly on twitter while she herself is facing no prospector employment. If coal miners can learn to code, so can they.

  17. Weird line to draw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be a weird line for Twitter to draw in the sand. They are okay with death and rape threats, threats of starting war, targetted harasment of women and politicians, but telling people to learn to code is where they put their foot down?

  18. Reporter coders? They'll just use stackoverflow by mveloso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reporters learning to code? Given the state of journalism today they'll just go to stackoverflow and copy the top 8 answers into the file and call it done.

    "I don't understand why I can't use hashtags to search for code snippets!"

    1. Re:Reporter coders? They'll just use stackoverflow by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Bbbbut they'll never get any badges that way

    2. Re:Reporter coders? They'll just use stackoverflow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sixth answer will surprise you !

    3. Re:Reporter coders? They'll just use stackoverflow by Alypius · · Score: 1

      "Top 25 ways to manage your data trees! Number eight will SHOCK you!"

  19. u cant say learn to code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but trump can pump out his racist bigotry like an open spigot

    1. Re:u cant say learn to code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Examples?

    2. Re: u cant say learn to code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it seems you're still allowed to make up utter bullshit with zero facts, and post it online.

      So there's that going for you I guess. Too bad everyone that does that just go laid off. Maybe you should learn to code?

    3. Re:u cant say learn to code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "Leftists"

  20. Probably Twitter HR department by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Looking for new recruits.

  21. "Might"? by Pluvius · · Score: 2

    It already has. There's documented proof of it.

    Rob

    1. Re:"Might"? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Those photos are probably accurate, but it's probably worth mentioning that these days, a photo doesn't really constitute proof.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:"Might"? by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can archive Twitter ban messages, unfortunately.

      Rob

    3. Re: "Might"? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Just have to consider it evidence in one direction, instead of proof.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  22. What is old.. is new again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    25+ years ago when I was in an Electrical Engineering program at a local University we used to joke even back then about useless degrees.

    "I have a degree in Humanities/Journalism/History/International Studies/Fine Arts..."

    "Would you like fries with that?"

    Now:

    What is old is new again... except now in our current over-hyped over-sensitized environment you can't joke like that because you might hurt their itty-bitty safe-space-isolated politically-protected feelings.

    Peace out.

  23. In retaliation for the journalists stupid articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't there lots of empty articles that keep telling everyone "Learn to Code" is the answer to every few weeks of "I just got laid off and nobody wants to hire me. I don't have skills. What should I do?"

    It's only proper to throw that krap right back at them, isn't it?

  24. More like become a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And help with the world toilet shortage. You’re more likely to have a phone than a toilet now days.

  25. NOT guilty as charged (I do it w/ good reason) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & a post of mine today (multiple downmods on it but FACT/TRUTH the ENTIRE body of it) https://science.slashdot.org/c... I do THAT all the time to my 'critics' who HIDE behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts like the WHIMPS & WEEZILS they are!

    (INFERIOR DEFECTIVE DEFICIENTS (thanks for the last one gweihir - always makes me laugh & SORRY to "Bite off your style" but it rocks)).

    * When ANY f'ing TROLL "snowflakian being" (that fear 'global warming' because as is, they MELT under the normal temp & pressure of LIFE, daily (lol)) does better? THEN feed me your BULLSHIT!

    "EMO" wusses & SNOWFLAKIAN BEINGS (lol) = worms & WASTE OF LIFE when you can't give back to society + be of service to others.

    MAKE A WHEEL, weezils https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di... & THEN you can talk/criticize me - until then? LMAO @ U!

    Some here, have & have my respect (raymorris for one, there are 2-3 others I know of only).

    LOL - yup, I see this message got thru to some "SNOWFLAKIAN EMOS" awww downmodding it 2x https://politics.slashdot.org/... & https://politics.slashdot.org/...

    APK

    P.S.=> It's meant to inspire except perhaps I made 1 SMALL error - thinking others can "measure up" & they're unable to (they'd rather go play XBox etc. OR shoot heroin)... apk

  26. Addendum = SELF-ACTUALIZATION... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & 1st result to understand (your duty as a human being, to yourself & others + a CIVIC duty imo) https://duckduckgo.com/html?q=...

    * NOW, the ONLY "Catch-22" I have w/ THAT goal is it's what the TRUE master of the MASONIC ORDER (see Albert Pike "Morals & Dogma" & see WHO he dedicated it to) had (albeit for the wrong reasons) - it's what "LUCY FUR" wanted to do to become "GOD"...

    APK

    P.S.=> Still, self-improvement never hurts - especially when you can help better this place we live in imo... apk

  27. Insults will not be tolerated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main propaganda organ of the internet is not amused.

  28. Enough by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Can we please route Twitter off the internet? It does nothing of value.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Enough by sheramil · · Score: 1

      And Facebook. And Pinterest.

    2. Re:Enough by houghi · · Score: 1

      And about 99.999999999% of the rest of the websites, including mine. An added bonus will be that search engines will be useless, and we can go back to the manual indexing of the golden years of Internet when the only problem we had was the blink tag.

      This is the browser for it

      Not: Some current websites might not work as expected. Please remove CSS and start using tables like it should be.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree

  29. Maybe if they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #LearnToJournalism

  30. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Take a concrete pill and harden the f**k up" - and link this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unkIVvjZc9Y (not a RickRoll)

  31. Talking past each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This comment section largely is whiny. Stop whining, whiners. (who am i kidding, slashdot stop being whiny in the 21st century? but i digress...)

    It's pretty clear from their responses that journalists are interpreting this as an attempt at diminishing them and the profession they also feel emotions about. That's right kids, they *identify* as journalists and have rationalizations for what they do and all that.

    Funnily enough, they feel that way because a lot of you are doing that, deliberately, and from a position that whether journalism or computer-stuff is more regarded in society is some kind of personal moral victory... and you can't tell the difference between the rationales 'learn to code to because computers are a lifestyle' or 'learn to code to be a better journalist with the tools of both fields at your disposal' any more than they can at a distance. You're just as bad as they are, cargo cultists.

    That said, i'm not here to tell you to 'learn to communicate' because... well... apparently journalists think that's what they're doing already. You should probably just go play video games and learn to lurk moar.

    1. Re:Talking past each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than likely they're just a bunch of self-entitled twits who are only now coming to terms with being completely irrelevant after being in their bubble with one another stroking each other off for so long. Good riddance.

  32. I used to trust the media to tell me the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: "... now I see PAYOFFS everywhere I look - who do you TRUST when everyone's a crook?" Queensryche "REVOLUTION CALLING" (a 'revolution of the MIND') https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    * THINK ABOUT WHAT I WROTE journalists per https://politics.slashdot.org/... especially...

    APK

    P.S.=> "For a PRICE, I'd do about anything EXCEPT 'pull the trigger' - for THAT, I need a pretty GOOD cause" -> https://it.slashdot.org/commen... ... apk

  33. Re: Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gab.ai is an engineering marvel and proof that the right are superior in every way. It has better and more functions and never has any server problems and the admins aren't overwhelmed and it's not full of child prons and Notch talks to me like i'm his best buddy and that definitely doesn't mean he has no friends now.

  34. Well, a smart joke is an abuse for an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's ban any form of humor and satire.

    Fucking delusional mickey mouse degree holders.

  35. Hey Journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn to assemble statements in the proper order that will cause a computer to carry out the desired functions!

    1. Re:Hey Journalists by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If they could assemble statements in the proper order they'd still have a job.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Ban Covington abusers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Twitter will ban people who tweet "learn to code" at a grown up Journalist, but they just Kathy Griffin and a host of those same "journalists" attack school kids without ramifications.

    Why does anyone actually use that PoS app anyway?

  37. The real story here by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

    I don't give a fuck about Twitter and its stupid fucking abuse policy. The real story of interest here is that multiple digital news outlets are laying off journalists left and right. They're nontraditional news outlets, but they are major news outlets nonetheless, and most of them are owned by companies who could easily afford to keep the journalists employed. For instance, I would guess that the journalists working for Verizon-- the parent company of several of these news outlets-- represent less than 0.1% of their labor costs.

    They could keep them around if they wanted to, but they don't want to.

    1. Re:The real story here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clickbait listicles aren't journalism. The world has passed the legacy media by and we aren't going back to them. They should learn to code, nobody cares about their worthless j-school degrees.

    2. Re:The real story here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't "news outlets", they're editorial outlets. While their stories might revolve around news, they're highly biased and slanted. Nothing wrong with that, but let's call a spade a spade.

      One of our biggest problems today is that most people on both sides of the spectrum get most of their "news" from opinion sites rather than real reporters. Further compounding it is that most of those opinion sites are not up front about what they are, making people believe they're getting the actual bare, unslanted news. All it does is further divide us as it balkanizes people within their bubbles. There can be no compromise if people are pushed apart and the other side is constantly labeled as immoral things for political reasons rather than actual behavior. Or when good things from one side is completely ignored by the other while any out of context bad thing is blown up.

  38. LOLZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Journalists??! LOL!!!

    Oh god, my sides!!

    1. Re:LOLZ! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same, if Twitter only punishes those that tweet this to journalists, where exactly is the problem?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. Sage advise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abusive? How dare they suggest that such sage advise given to others who lost their jobs is abusive. I happen to know a coal miner turned programmer and he's very unhappy to hear this news.

  40. Now We Know by STRICQ · · Score: 1

    As if we already didn't who gets to make the decision of what is moral and socially acceptable now. They also get to decide what is fake and what is real, regardless of reality.

  41. Re: Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You had to know Notch as a mega asshole when some girl broke up with him and gave the excuse that he was "too rich" lol

  42. I used to trust the media to tell me the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: "... now I see PAYOFFS everywhere I look - who do you TRUST when everyone's a crook?" Queensryche "REVOLUTION CALLING" https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (a 'revolution of the MIND')

    * THINK ABOUT WHAT I WROTE journalists per https://politics.slashdot.org/... especially...

    APK

    P.S.=> "For a PRICE, I'd do about anything EXCEPT 'pull the trigger' - for THAT, I need a pretty GOOD cause" -> https://it.slashdot.org/commen... ... apk

  43. It'll never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can understand why this is considered hate speech. With all of the fake news being published, these journalists will never be able to comprehend the difference between True and False.

    1. Re:It'll never work by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, they already demonstrated that they can't handle irony, that much is at least true.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  44. Great. by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Now, Twitter's going to be our purse-lipped mother-in-law?

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  45. Journalists thought it OK for coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never saw a single journalist push back on either the Obama administration or then-candidate Hillary Clinton as they both (and many of their supporters both in and out of the press corps) declared that the coal mines should indeed by shuttered and those coal miners be given "re-training" for "jobs of the future" (which are always implied as software writing jobs, since service jobs are "jobs American won't do" and manufacturing jobs are being outsourced and are obviously a dead-end in the US).

    The smarmy "let them eat cake" attitude toward a vast swath of the American middle class workers is not just among elites in think tanks and on capitol hill, but has long extended deeply into the halls of journalists. When average Americans either actually lose their jobs, or have their job losses pre-planned by elites, in the pursuit of some regulatory scheme, or trade plan, there's rarely much of a fuss by the elitse and their usual variations of "it sucks to be you, maybe you need to learn to code" are perfunctory and plentiful. It's sort of refreshing to see them face the same garbage. Incidentally: I've never heard of Twitter considering punishment for anybody calling for non-journalists to "learn to code".

  46. Meaningless by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    If Twitter is going to continue their policy of selectively enforcing rules when the spotlight is on them... this is utterly meaningless.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. OK, then... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    1) Users who tweet learn to code are banned.
    2) Twitter loses more and more market share.
    3) ???
    4) ex-twitter employees join ex-journalist at school where they learn to code.

  49. Re: Drumpf sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well ever caving to wallstreet and being a rape apologist didn't work out for Hillary did it?

    I hope she runs again, between her corruption and little miss 1/1024 native american, I don't know which would be funnier to watch.

  50. You can hardly call them journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BuzzFeed, Yahoo and AOL authors are merely pen-pushers and click-baiters.

  51. Re:Drumpf sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever gave you the dumbfuck idea that competitiveness and aggressiveness are good or even useful negotiation tactics?

    Just look at how his borderwall^wfence^wslats are going to be paid for by mexicans^wtariffs^wamericans^wnobody to see how successful he is at making a deal.

    Trump is a rich person who is President, you're posting AC to Slashdot, and YOU are trying to claim Trump's strategies don't work?

    Calling you dumb as a post would be an insult to wood.

  52. Re:Drumpf sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eg he's a massive dick

  53. Re:Drumpf sucks balls. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You only win the prisoner's dilemma by defecting as long as you play with someone who cooperates because he learned that this is actually the winning strategy. Once he notices you're defecting, he'll start doing the same, ending up in lower effectiveness for both of you.

    I guess we're heading for shittier times.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  54. Itâ(TM)s going to take more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theyâ(TM)ll have to extend it to any advise to a journalist that involves the phrase âoelearnâ otherwise the suggestions will become all the more scathing.

  55. Tweeting "learn to code" is harrassment? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    So ... these "journalists" (I'll use the term loosely here) were laid off for harassing people?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  56. Re:Addendum = SELF-ACTUALIZATION... apk by f3rret · · Score: 1

    So. Changed your meds again, did they?

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  57. Retarded bitch APK is mad he got down modded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retarded bitch Alexander Peter Kowalski is mad that his BS keeps getting modded down. Maybe if he could actually post something that wasn't complete crap it wouldn't happen.
    Here is a chronicle of your bitch ass getting beaten on your port filtering statements.
    Here is another one where your got beaten hard because you can't back up anything you say. This was about how you claim your shitware can block all hosts in a domain, which it can't.
    Then there is your claim that the Chinese copied you but you admit that at best all you have is wild ass speculation and can't offer any real proof or even actual evidence to support yourself.
    How about the list of experts you claim support your statements, none of which actually support your work and have been shown to actually be saying things different from what you stated they were.
    Maybe instead you can tell us about your "success" where a project rejected your stupid simplistic idea or maybe threaten to sue someone again because you are a insecure little man who is washed up and never amounted to anything.
    Better yet you can prove how defective you are by continuing to repeat your debunked BS some more.
    Why don't you get your pretend friend to post some fake support and then throw a fit when you get caught.

  58. This programmer worked at the Associated Press by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 1

    For seven years, I worked as a programmer at the Associated Press in Manhattan. I met a lot of journalists. It was obvious I wouldn't make a good journalist, because I wasn't interested in the stuff they were interested in. And it was equally obvious they would make poor programmers, for exactly the same reason.

    --
    - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
    1. Re:This programmer worked at the Associated Press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your anecdote isn't the point. The point is to mock them mercilessly so they might have a shred of introspection.

  59. Re: Drumpf sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You calling him a dumbfuck makes his point for him

  60. Re: Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AO by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Of course. Twitter is an arm of the prog leftard commie asshole movement.

    If you want to sell that line, you'll have to explain why they haven't terminated Donald Trump's account for violations of the ToS. The truth is that twitter is amoral at best, they just want money, so they want views. Any tweet that makes them more money than it costs them is a good match for their corporate values.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  61. How to learn to code by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Remember what the coal miners got told?

    Code now has a few slight changes. Learn how to read a Code of Conduct (CoC) and what a CoC allows code to be used for in 2019 and beyond.
    Select a computer code that is still in use. Has the code got a CoC that allows the results to still make a profit?
    Do you have to show your code for anyone to copy and give away for free?
    Dont learn a code that makes you give everything you worked on away for free.
    Will the CoC make the code difficult to use and make a profit from? Look at a better code with a less restrictive CoC.

    Code that fully respects the right to make a profit and to keep the results of the many hours of hard work put into a project.

    Find a code product that has allows the results of hard work to be sold for a profit no matter the type of project and who you work for.

    A code with lots of complex English terms and words in it. That keeps average foreign workers away from that type of code.
    No good learning a code that is cheaper to code with outside the USA. Use your advanced US English education when learning to code.
    A CoC that does not track all code use and make later demands on how that code is been used.

    After finding code that is in use in 2019 and that allows a profit to be made, look for an approved way for learning how to code.
    Getting an approved education in code allows that professional skill to be used.
    Take out a loan. Use savings from a bank account. Get accepted into an approved educational company that can teach code.
    Find an approved computer teaching company and invest fully in the hours, days, weeks, months, years and "Learn to Code".
    Remember to watch for any changes on the CoC that will reduce the ability to make a profit form the code.
    Be ready for any attempts by a CoC to track code use and make demands on how code is used.
    CoC can change at any time for any reason. So select a good quality code before learning how to code.
    Find an online code community that works to support users. Do they actually help users code or just use code to push their political views?

    Attend code class on time and have all your work ready.
    Do the code homework that's set and be ready for all code exams and tests.
    Take more time to really study the needed complex math. Math is needed and should be studied outside any set code work that is set.
    Long hours learning code. Learning new math. Learning how to use the advanced math with the code.
    After years of hard work apply for all the new code jobs all over the USA.
    Be ready to move to any part of the USA given a company may seek low tax rates in different fully gentrified cities and states.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  62. Re: Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You already answered that. For as much virtue signaling as they like to do, they like money more, and Trump makes them a lot of money.

    Also, because of a very poor court decision, it might actually be illegal for Twitter to terminate his account as it would be violating the peoples right to petition the government. Seriously, that judge really didn't think that decision through at all.

  63. really? by racerex · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of snowflakes. If that's abusive then I shutter to think what they would've thought about how my generation's parents treated us growing up.

  64. Re: Meanwhile feeding kids into woodchippers is AO by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You already answered that. For as much virtue signaling as they like to do, they like money more, and Trump makes them a lot of money.

    Virtue signalling doesn't speak to someone's political orientation, only to how they want to appear for public purposes. It doesn't mean what you think it means. There's nothing liberal about Twitter.

    Also, because of a very poor court decision, it might actually be illegal for Twitter to terminate his account as it would be violating the peoples right to petition the government.

    It wouldn't. The relationship doesn't go in that direction, only the opposite: Trump can't block people on Twitter because he's using it as an official communications medium. If he isn't, then it becomes irrelevant to that argument. Twitter can block Trump, but they can't let Trump block people.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  65. Twitter is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abandon ship. Women and children first.

    Remember when twitter pretended to be a bastion of free speech? Seems like most of these tech companies worm their way in as a quality service or product then mutate into something hideous.

    Twitter is tyrannical. No way around that one. They've read up on their Gestapo and KGB esque tactics, at the very least.

  66. end this religious nightmare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Objectively this isn't an issue.

    But there is this increasing religious zeal in which people take up the cross of their political priests and chant their way to jihad

    Who outside of those effected could see this ad problematic? Who as an adult human allows this childish taunt to effect them? Arnt these professional journalists? They're perfectly open to taunts. Reflect them, disregard them.

    Or

    Maybe if these people didn't spend all their time tearing other people down they wouldn't have to worry about getting hit in return.

    Childish any way you slice it.

  67. What about when the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean when coders lose their jobs, journalists can tweet, "Learn journalism!" to coders?

  68. "privilege, cause cherry picked stats" on slashdot by Kartu · · Score: 1

    "privilege, since cherry picked stats" on slashdot, we are "progressing" fast.
    Now let me cherry pick some other stats for you:

    About 350 firemen died on 9/11, most of them white, 100% of them men.
    Men earn more, but spend a fraction of earnings, yet are pointed out to have "privilege".
    Average US man works 30% longer hours and spends 30% more to commute to work, than working woman.
    Men are getting longer prison sentences and are more likely to get sentence than women, (for the same crime, both first timers)
    Boys are lagging behind at all stages of education, enrollment at high school soon to reach 40% vs 60%, but gender focused programs are still focused on girls.
    Men are times more likely to commit suicide.
    Men dominate at the bottom of the social pyramid, regardless of their skin color (homless, high risk jobs (90%+ of workspace fatalities) etc).

    So, what you were saying again?

  69. This many snowflakes... by Quake1v1 · · Score: 1

    ...will always cause an avalanche.

  70. Re:Drumpf sucks balls. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

    There are two good things about Trump: (1) his negotiating strategy appears to be more realistic, i.e. he's very combative and aggressive and (2) he's annoying all the right people.

    LOL, Trump gets rolled in every negotiation he takes part in. How's that denuclearized North Korea thing working out? He is certainly combative and aggressive, I'll give you that.

    And annoying all the right people? The Republicans really have made spite and resentment their political philosophy.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  71. Re: Drumpf sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well ever caving to wallstreet and being a rape apologist didn't work out for Hillary did it?

    No, but it worked just fine for Donald Trump!

  72. Fuck them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should produce something instead of writing articles about what others have accomplished. Also, twitter sucks.

  73. You lose vs. verifiable FACTS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.) My program stops portfilter errs in hosts https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    2.) Wildcards CREATE FALSE POSITIVES (try wildcard myftp.org, not all sites in it = bad). Hosts specifics don't cause that.

    3.) CHINA did hardcodes LONG AFTER I DID "Time is on MY SIDE" (Rolling Stones) https://theregister.co.uk/2017...

    4.) /. users state the value of hosts for getting users more speed/security/reliability/anonymity listed here (enumerated as "Registered /.ers reviews") https://it.slashdot.org/commen...

    5.) Security pros galore + /.ers praise the layered security efficacy of hosts quoted here https://it.slashdot.org/commen...

    6.) I never had to sue Thor SCHMUCK - CA rescinded their FALSE POSITIVE error, sold off their shitty antivirus & I said I'd speak to an attorney & I did who advised I go thru their removal process & I won.

    APK

    P.S.=> You can't even STAND BEHIND YOUR WORDS (lies) you UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous STALKER of me... apk

  74. are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its fucking twitter. who cares.

  75. What if I tweet... by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

    "Learn to code" to the Twitter Dev team?

  76. Re:Drumpf sucks balls. by danbert8 · · Score: 1

    How's that denuclearized North Korea thing working out?

    Better than it has been previously? I mean, it's at least a step toward peace and he's not doing it through appeasement.

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  77. Bad idea anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coding jobs are going to India, so why learn coding.
    Pass the bar, too many assholes in that occupation already.
    Learn Anatomy, that requires intelligence. You may still become a government employee, but with HUGE college debt.
    Learn to Plumb. That job can't be sent overseas. YEAH that's the ticket!

  78. just how many lies to you plan on spewing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before any one with any self-respect just plain ignores you as being a tool?

  79. Re:Drumpf sucks balls. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    So, you bought the whore's book? And then actually read it?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  80. Re: Drumpf sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL!!!!

  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. Re:Drumpf sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget those awesome negotiating skills he put to use to build that wall and make Mexico pay for it

  83. Coding is mega-boring. by laxr5rs · · Score: 1

    That's why I'm in release. Looking at a 2D screen all day and moving characters around in accordance with an imagined framework. Oh, THAT's exciting! It's exciting if you have a severe analytical bent. PUZZLES everyone loves PUZZLES! Right!? No, not everyone. If I'm going to puzzle about something, it's not going to be about which way I should move characters around in my editor. I have a "real life" out here, believe it or not. Telling someone like a Journalist, who actually interacts with humans (remember those?) to "learn to code," is tantamount to telling them to slit their throats in anguish. Who WANTS to code? Analytical puzzle solvers. And they are often not much fun at parties. Who needs to get off their high horse? Coders. You're not the salvation of Earth, you're just moving characters around and when something works.? "YOO HOO! I'm a GOD!" Yeah... you're a god. Sure.

  84. Journalists did it to coal miners first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So perhaps instead of #learntocode, we can trend #learntocoal?

  85. Twitter needs to die by philmarcracken · · Score: 1

    Still kinda sad to see twitter stock recovery. It needs to die, it will never be a source of constructive thought just a tiny window for the unwashed masses to throw low effort insults at each other.

    The worst part is people thinking its required to uphold freedom of speech and be unbiased.

  86. Jesus ain't say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus said "turn the other cheek" not "do the tomahawk chop". But hey NotRaciss(tm). Why didn't they wander off? They weren't being detained. They chose to stay there. That moves the responsibility on to them.

    1. Re:Jesus ain't say that by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      They didn't turn around and run away, therefore it's their fault!? They responded to stupidity with mockery, so they'r racists?
      Don't you have a road to block with your Antifa buddies, where you uses racial epithets to call other people racists?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  87. NO she didn't, liar, L2REED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic - you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people - now how 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America. But the other basket - and I know this because I see friends from all over America here - I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas - as well as, you know, New York and California - but that other basket of people are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they're just desperate for change. It doesn't really even matter where it comes from. They don't buy everything he says, but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won't wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroine, feel like they're in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.

  88. Re: Drumpf sucks balls. by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    I hope she runs again, between her corruption and little miss 1/1024 native american, I don't know which would be funnier to watch.

    So do I... I desperately hope the Democrats try to get that nutty cunt into office again.

  89. Not this shit again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And also that Yani guy

    LAUREL! It's pronounced LAUREL, ya goddamned deaf-ass.

  90. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't kick someone while they are down, help them stand up, progress.

  91. Hey NPC Download an update to your strings by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    You are sitting in front of an internet connected computer and you can't even bother to hit google ?

    https://www.redstate.com/sarah...

    https://twitter.com/DLoesch/st...

    It's no wonder the right thinks you lot are little more than automatons.