OK I get the SATA but do you really need GigaE for a 1GHz cortex? I think it would be hard to find a real-life case where network throughput was a bottleneck.
The sibling post made the point about finding replacement parts for when things die. That was always my motivation for a complete system upgrade - something dieing and needing to be replaced without me digging deep enough to find something that would work with the old system.
Buy new machine running Win7/8, install free vmware/virtualbox, run specialist software in VM fullscreen. Done
I was going to suggest the same thing. Virtualisation can make new hardware compatible with old OSs.
Certainly there's one advantage to the English law in that if you're faced with a frivolous suit you can contest it and if you win the other side will typically bear your costs.
True, but you have to fund the costs in the first place. You might find a lawyer who will act on your behalf for deferred costs, but there is no guarantee.
As Americans, we should never take our freedoms for granted
Especially if you deal with the Muslims, you have to be double careful
That company in Qatar are Muslim owned and operated, that poor British woman did not understand the barbarism of the Muslims and that's how she ends up facing all the legal fiasco now
As a businessman I sometimes had to deal with people from the Middle East, from Pakistan, from Turkey --- I tried my best not to, but then, business is business --- and when I deal with the Muslims, I be extra careful, because those people will eat you alive if they perceive that you are weak
That's true. This form of extorsion is probably another Al-Quaida revenu stream. Everyone should make a point not to deal with Muslim connected businesses. Even if you don't get ripped off you will be funding terror
You may think you're doing right, you may think you're doing good, but in reality you're exactly the same as the likes of Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada, you just thankfully haven't found the platform and hence do not have the listeners to do the same damage they do.
So in your book pointing out that Muslims are violent and dangerous is morally equivalent of soliciting things that Abu Hamsa did like murder, aiding and abetting kidnapping, multiple acts of murder - and the things that Abu Qatada is accused of, recruiting terrorists, mentoring the WTC bombers, sending money to terrorist organisations? I'm beginning to see why you think there are others who are just as bad as the Muslims now.
I thought the blocking of external clients was a bad move, setting up a walled garden chat. This has reassured me that they really were looking at the spam issue, bit blocking competition.
Google has shown that they will take away the free services they offer at any time, or even increase the advertising in them to make them almost unusable to some (such as Google Maps).
Really? Maybe its regional but I haven't noticed obtrusive advertising on google maps.
Right so you now regularly intend to speak out against Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, and far right extremism because they do carry out similar attacks across the globe?
Give this, why do you single out Islam?
If any of them regularly called for this violence and attacks then yes. Actually the level of Christian, Hindu and Buddhist attacks are much less than those of Muslims.
If you can't understand that most muslims are non-white caucasian and that most islamophobes single out muslims over other arguably worse, but same race killers (like Adam Lanza and friends) because they are racist, even if they can't admit it deep down, then I can't really help you understand why I said what I said and the reason I said it for.
If there was a group that followed Adam Lanza, regularly announced that they would carry out similar attacks and in practice did so, I would certainly speak out against them too.
Then you can't remember very far and should probably avoid the topic given that fact.
"Really? What race am I discriminating against? What race am I? Go on tell"
Look, I don't play games. I have zero respect for people who like to pretend they're the good citizen, that they're objective, fair, sensible, rational individuals and that this is nothing to do with race because they "have friends who are muslim" and so on. I prefer to call a spade a spade, and you're likely discriminating against people who aren't white caucasian Westerners.
You are completely full of bullshit here. Do you really think that I somehow admire white Muslims or black Muslim terrorists but only feel outrage at brown ones?
If you hold a political view at least have the courage of your convictions to accept it and admit you're part of the far right and a fascist.
You are wrong, my politics are probably slightly left of centre. Read the Qur'an and listen to the words of Muslim clerics and you will see how anyone who believes in tolerance, equality, justice for all, and freedom of expression should opose Islam
Yes but I am not going to say what it is because to do so in a public forum where I criticise Islam might lead to attacks on others. To anticipate your next point - Yes members of my religion have suggested that there should be revenge attacks on Muslims. But when they did religious leaders quickly made sure everyone knew that it was against the teachings of the religion. One said "you might as well convert to Islam and follow the dog Muhammad as go and attack Muslims".
Slate is twisting itself in new corners. Now that it seems the bombers are Tjetchen, they are claiming that since they are technically Caucasian, they are white and therefor it ain't brown people just as they said.
EXCEPT that in the shooting of Trevor by a Hispanic guy, suddenly Hispanic does NOT mean your white because they are Caucasian... wow, it certainly seems as if being white and Caucasian are only the same thing if it is convenient. (By the way, this goes for the left and right).
And by the way, slate is NOT left wing, it is the bleeding heart wing. Real left can and often is very hard and most definitely anti-faith.
There are black, brown, chinese, and white Muslim terrorists. All follow the same vile belief. Race has nothing to do with it.
Yes except that's a complete lie given that there were a number of bombings that resulted in deaths and injuries where no warnings were given.
.
There were some. As far as I can remember these were aimed at military targets or other paramilitary groups. As I said the IRA were a nasty bunch, they certainly did not try to avoid random casualties when doing this. On occasions they even apologised when there were no warnings, claiming that timers malfunctioned. Were they terrorist? Yes. Was their aim to kill and amim at random? No - but they didn't mind if that was a secondary attack. I'm certainly not saying that this is in any way good, but it is a way to distinguish Muzzies attacks.
Don't try and pretend there's any difference simply because you're racist, terrorists are terrorists.
Really? What race am I discriminating against? What race am I? Go on tell
What makes you think they were Muslims?
Neither Tamerlan Tsarnaev nor Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are common names among Muslims. They are far more common among Orthodox Christians.
In the unlikely event they are turn out to be Christian terrorists I will apologise. I say unlikely because the Muzzies have .
You guessed right, sucks when bigots feel validated through confirmation bias. You were wrong about the Norway attacks though, I remember what you posted in that thread. So, one right, one wrong, you're about as good as a flipped coin.
I was wrong about the Norway attacks. It was one individual, who in my opinion was insane. Now look at the list of terror attacks in 2012 and tell me that putting mas murder down to Muslims is just like flipping a coin. I make it about 17 out of 20, and its only that low because Wikipedia counts things like "a possible second US drone strike has killed two more suspected foreign fighters in northwestern Pakistan", and "Two US drone strikes in the volatile tribal belt of northwest Pakistan killed at least five suspected militants on Friday" as terrorist attacks.
Why do you bother to maintain an ID here, they must hate you.
I have noticed that more people are starting to understand the truth about Islam. I think that posting with an ID is important, or else you can get dismissed as one of those trolls who post racist comments to shock. Part of Islam's and their useful idiots defense is that people who point out how they act in their countries are being racist, that their position now is like the Jews in WW2. Look at any Islamic country and you will have no doubt that their position is like the Nazis in WWII, listen to whet the leaders say and you will see that they have the same plan of world domination.
Don't forget the IRA and their fundraisers in various US cities, including Boston.
The IRA were nasty. They wanted to cause alarm and panic, and they didn't mind too much if bystanders got hurt. But unlike the Muslims they did issue warnings. The killing and maiming was a not the primary aim, the panic and disruption was.
Watch the total absence of the posters who previously seemed to think that it was just as likely to be the tea party or the Mormon tabernacle choir as Muslims. Though there have been exceptions this sort of attack, aimed at killing and injuring indiscriminately is the hallmark of Islam.
Slashdot Mirror
but won't somebody think of the Mercury?
Good ol' Freddy, we still miss him
Still no SATA and no GigaE.
OK I get the SATA but do you really need GigaE for a 1GHz cortex? I think it would be hard to find a real-life case where network throughput was a bottleneck.
PAE is more or less old school segmentation.
PAE isn't segmentation at all.
I suppose it depends on how you look at it. If you view the page directory as a bank select then it is a sort of segmentation.
Why is nobody mentioning WINE
Software costs are a big problem but I'm not quite ready to hit the bottle yet.
The sibling post made the point about finding replacement parts for when things die. That was always my motivation for a complete system upgrade - something dieing and needing to be replaced without me digging deep enough to find something that would work with the old system.
Buy new machine running Win7/8, install free vmware/virtualbox, run specialist software in VM fullscreen. Done
I was going to suggest the same thing. Virtualisation can make new hardware compatible with old OSs.
Certainly there's one advantage to the English law in that if you're faced with a frivolous suit you can contest it and if you win the other side will typically bear your costs.
True, but you have to fund the costs in the first place. You might find a lawyer who will act on your behalf for deferred costs, but there is no guarantee.
As Americans, we should never take our freedoms for granted
Especially if you deal with the Muslims, you have to be double careful
That company in Qatar are Muslim owned and operated, that poor British woman did not understand the barbarism of the Muslims and that's how she ends up facing all the legal fiasco now
As a businessman I sometimes had to deal with people from the Middle East, from Pakistan, from Turkey --- I tried my best not to, but then, business is business --- and when I deal with the Muslims, I be extra careful, because those people will eat you alive if they perceive that you are weak
That's true. This form of extorsion is probably another Al-Quaida revenu stream. Everyone should make a point not to deal with Muslim connected businesses. Even if you don't get ripped off you will be funding terror
Prove it.
What do you want me to do, Muzzie? Curse Jesus or burn a bible or something?
I don't suppose your religion is also one that shoots abortion doctors, beats up gay men and blew up a lot of stuff in Ireland twenty years ago?
No
You may think you're doing right, you may think you're doing good, but in reality you're exactly the same as the likes of Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada, you just thankfully haven't found the platform and hence do not have the listeners to do the same damage they do.
So in your book pointing out that Muslims are violent and dangerous is morally equivalent of soliciting things that Abu Hamsa did like murder, aiding and abetting kidnapping, multiple acts of murder - and the things that Abu Qatada is accused of, recruiting terrorists, mentoring the WTC bombers, sending money to terrorist organisations? I'm beginning to see why you think there are others who are just as bad as the Muslims now.
I thought the blocking of external clients was a bad move, setting up a walled garden chat. This has reassured me that they really were looking at the spam issue, bit blocking competition.
Google has shown that they will take away the free services they offer at any time, or even increase the advertising in them to make them almost unusable to some (such as Google Maps).
Really? Maybe its regional but I haven't noticed obtrusive advertising on google maps.
Right so you now regularly intend to speak out against Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, and far right extremism because they do carry out similar attacks across the globe?
Give this, why do you single out Islam?
If any of them regularly called for this violence and attacks then yes. Actually the level of Christian, Hindu and Buddhist attacks are much less than those of Muslims.
If you can't understand that most muslims are non-white caucasian and that most islamophobes single out muslims over other arguably worse, but same race killers (like Adam Lanza and friends) because they are racist, even if they can't admit it deep down, then I can't really help you understand why I said what I said and the reason I said it for.
If there was a group that followed Adam Lanza, regularly announced that they would carry out similar attacks and in practice did so, I would certainly speak out against them too.
Then you can't remember very far and should probably avoid the topic given that fact.
"Really? What race am I discriminating against? What race am I? Go on tell"
Look, I don't play games. I have zero respect for people who like to pretend they're the good citizen, that they're objective, fair, sensible, rational individuals and that this is nothing to do with race because they "have friends who are muslim" and so on. I prefer to call a spade a spade, and you're likely discriminating against people who aren't white caucasian Westerners.
You are completely full of bullshit here. Do you really think that I somehow admire white Muslims or black Muslim terrorists but only feel outrage at brown ones?
If you hold a political view at least have the courage of your convictions to accept it and admit you're part of the far right and a fascist.
You are wrong, my politics are probably slightly left of centre. Read the Qur'an and listen to the words of Muslim clerics and you will see how anyone who believes in tolerance, equality, justice for all, and freedom of expression should opose Islam
Do you have a religion yourself?
Yes but I am not going to say what it is because to do so in a public forum where I criticise Islam might lead to attacks on others. To anticipate your next point - Yes members of my religion have suggested that there should be revenge attacks on Muslims. But when they did religious leaders quickly made sure everyone knew that it was against the teachings of the religion. One said "you might as well convert to Islam and follow the dog Muhammad as go and attack Muslims".
Two Caucasians. Suck it shit for brains.
What, are you some sort of racist? What has race got to do with it?
Slate is twisting itself in new corners. Now that it seems the bombers are Tjetchen, they are claiming that since they are technically Caucasian, they are white and therefor it ain't brown people just as they said.
EXCEPT that in the shooting of Trevor by a Hispanic guy, suddenly Hispanic does NOT mean your white because they are Caucasian... wow, it certainly seems as if being white and Caucasian are only the same thing if it is convenient. (By the way, this goes for the left and right).
And by the way, slate is NOT left wing, it is the bleeding heart wing. Real left can and often is very hard and most definitely anti-faith.
There are black, brown, chinese, and white Muslim terrorists. All follow the same vile belief. Race has nothing to do with it.
Yes except that's a complete lie given that there were a number of bombings that resulted in deaths and injuries where no warnings were given.
.
There were some. As far as I can remember these were aimed at military targets or other paramilitary groups. As I said the IRA were a nasty bunch, they certainly did not try to avoid random casualties when doing this. On occasions they even apologised when there were no warnings, claiming that timers malfunctioned. Were they terrorist? Yes. Was their aim to kill and amim at random? No - but they didn't mind if that was a secondary attack. I'm certainly not saying that this is in any way good, but it is a way to distinguish Muzzies attacks.
Don't try and pretend there's any difference simply because you're racist, terrorists are terrorists.
Really? What race am I discriminating against? What race am I? Go on tell
Correlation does not imply causation. Get a grip.
No, but we can look at the teachings of Islam and the words of muslim clerics to confirm that there is a causation
What makes you think they were Muslims? Neither Tamerlan Tsarnaev nor Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are common names among Muslims. They are far more common among Orthodox Christians.
In the unlikely event they are turn out to be Christian terrorists I will apologise. I say unlikely because the Muzzies have .
You guessed right, sucks when bigots feel validated through confirmation bias. You were wrong about the Norway attacks though, I remember what you posted in that thread. So, one right, one wrong, you're about as good as a flipped coin.
I was wrong about the Norway attacks. It was one individual, who in my opinion was insane. Now look at the list of terror attacks in 2012 and tell me that putting mas murder down to Muslims is just like flipping a coin. I make it about 17 out of 20, and its only that low because Wikipedia counts things like "a possible second US drone strike has killed two more suspected foreign fighters in northwestern Pakistan", and "Two US drone strikes in the volatile tribal belt of northwest Pakistan killed at least five suspected militants on Friday" as terrorist attacks.
Why do you bother to maintain an ID here, they must hate you.
I have noticed that more people are starting to understand the truth about Islam. I think that posting with an ID is important, or else you can get dismissed as one of those trolls who post racist comments to shock. Part of Islam's and their useful idiots defense is that people who point out how they act in their countries are being racist, that their position now is like the Jews in WW2. Look at any Islamic country and you will have no doubt that their position is like the Nazis in WWII, listen to whet the leaders say and you will see that they have the same plan of world domination.
Don't forget the IRA and their fundraisers in various US cities, including Boston.
The IRA were nasty. They wanted to cause alarm and panic, and they didn't mind too much if bystanders got hurt. But unlike the Muslims they did issue warnings. The killing and maiming was a not the primary aim, the panic and disruption was.
Watch the total absence of the posters who previously seemed to think that it was just as likely to be the tea party or the Mormon tabernacle choir as Muslims. Though there have been exceptions this sort of attack, aimed at killing and injuring indiscriminately is the hallmark of Islam.