Fair enough, point taken. I can't help but think however that cralewyth's original point, that the list should be for things that haven't had a public impact yet, has some legitimacy. At the extreme one could argue that things like internal plumbing and transistors are likely to be important in 2006 but they're not in the list either.
It's apples and oranges man! You can't [pause] compare [pause] Kirk [Shatneresque intonation] to the Crushernator. Anyway, I think Wil's more of a slashdotter than Shatner could ever be.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah - you have been heartattaXX0red.
But hammers certainly.
Fair enough, point taken. I can't help but think however that cralewyth's original point, that the list should be for things that haven't had a public impact yet, has some legitimacy. At the extreme one could argue that things like internal plumbing and transistors are likely to be important in 2006 but they're not in the list either.
Good point - I hadn't really considered that Spybot has value to me beyond that of a lot of the software I've actually paid for over the years.
They were the "killer apps" of 320 BC.
I agree. The plethora of information and opinion pieces about Ajax over the past six months would seem to suggest that 2005 was the Ajax's year.
Excellent question. Like Thomas Jefferson said "eternal vigilance is the price of posting".
It's apples and oranges man! You can't [pause] compare [pause] Kirk [Shatneresque intonation] to the Crushernator. Anyway, I think Wil's more of a slashdotter than Shatner could ever be.