Slashdot Mirror


15 Important Tech Concepts In 2006

MBoy wrote to mention a Popular Mechanics story discussing 15 technology concepts that are likely to be important in the coming year. From the article: "Body Area Network (BAN) - Like everything else, implantable medical devices are going wireless. A new in-body antenna chip from Zarlink Semiconductor is in preproduction, and should appear in pacemakers and hearing implants this year. By transmitting data to and receiving instructions from nearby base stations, BAN chips can reprogram your heartbeat at your doctor's office or make a diagnosis from a bedside wireless monitor at home." I prefer Personal Area Network (PAN), myself.

164 comments

  1. FIOS, Baby! by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I like their prediction of the expansion of FIOS (fiber optic broadband to the home at speeds of 30 megabits). I'm a Verizon customer and I've been salivating, waiting for them to bring it to my area.

    There are those who will put forward the argument that 30 megabits isn't going to improve the average Internet experience over the 5-8 megabit speeds being offered now by a lot of cable and some DSL providers. But didn't Bill Gates once say that 640k of memory should be more than enough for anyone? :-)

    Just like most broadband service offerings, speed will be asynchronous. Right now, my 8 megabit downstream line is only 768k upstream. But the 5 and 15 megabit service will be 2 megabits up, which gives you better than a T1 into the home. The 30 megabit service gives you 5 megabits up. The consumer packages, according to their FAQ, do not allow you to run a server, but give it a little time. 5 megabits up is enough to run a nice little web server so long as you don't get Slashdotted or DDOS'ed.

    Of course, it also means that compromised PCs will be able to do nasty things their botnet masters command 6-7 times faster. But when I go FIOS, I go 100% Linux.

    - Greg

    1. Re:FIOS, Baby! by matt21811 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "But didn't Bill Gates once say that 640k of memory should be more than enough for anyone? :-)"
      Yes, he didnt say that.

    2. Re:FIOS, Baby! by iogan · · Score: 1

      yeah... um... I don't know how to tell you this, but we've had 100Mbit lines for oh, about two years now.

      And it's sweet.

      --------------------
      link your blog/website for free
      http://www.doyoulikemyface.com/

    3. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like what South Korea has had for years, on DSL lines, which is a whole lot cheaper. Verizon sucks anyways. They union bust, treat employees like shiat, and have done nothing but slow the US cellular market by supporting an incompatible standard.

    4. Re:FIOS, Baby! by cralewyth · · Score: 1

      But when I go FIOS, I go 100% Linux.

      You mean you're not already 100% Linux!? What, oh what, has happened to the slashdot demographic lately....

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    5. Re:FIOS, Baby! by novakyu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Of course, it also means that compromised PCs will be able to do nasty things their botnet masters command 6-7 times faster. But when I go FIOS, I go 100% Linux.

      Because you know... Linux is unsinkable, like Titanic? Read through Secunia advisories when you have the time... if you run a server, possibly a web server serving PHP scripts vulnerable to a variety of exploits, some of which can even lead to system compromise (rather than, say, something that can only be used to DDoS someone else), it's far less secure than just using an up-to-date Windows XP workstation with proper firewall setup and a user with good sense (i.e. don't visit untrusted sites with IE, don't run executables that you don't know what they are). Running a server more than offsets whatever security you gain by switching to a Unix.

      The group I volunteer at runs a dozen or so Solaris workstations. Just because Solaris is less used, we have gotten past a few Linux exploit attempts (because script kiddies can't tell a unix from windows, and a real unix from a unix clone), but our users still somehow manage to get themselves hacked into. Just remember: Linux != Security. ${ANY_OPERATING_SYSTEM} + good sense == security.

    6. Re:FIOS, Baby! by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ${ANY_OPERATING_SYSTEM} + good sense == security

      Any?

      Show me a secure Win98 box (or XP for that matter), and then we'll talk.
      Sure, a dumb user can turn any OS into a script kiddie paradise, but this doesn't work the other way. Both the OS and the user need to have a clue.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    7. Re:FIOS, Baby! by scaturan · · Score: 1

      yep, was fortunate to be one of the townships in Northern New Jersey to get it, 5th in my own! Speed has always been consistant as advertised. My only complaint is the disconnection for long-periods of FTP/rsync-based file transfers on both directions, from what I have seen. It must be a mechanism to prevent users from running servers of some sort. But as long as I can pipe everything on port 22, it's all good. :) Prior to that, I was with OOL (optimum online service) for a few years. It's an "ok" service if you're not a heavy file uploader. The quality of service degraded once I discovered & started using Gallery - http://gallery.sf.net/ - to manage my digital photos. both HTTP/ftp-based uploads got my connection capped with no detailed explanation provided other than "there are our policies, sir". Nuff' said. FIOS just simply, ROCKS. can't wait for IPTV, dhcp or static-ip to arrive for home users. :)

    8. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Japan, in a rural area and I'm on 50mbps.

      offtopic:
      I know slashdot is America focused but there's a lot of technology heralded as new that's pretty standard over here. Like a while back TV on phones, my phone is nearly two years old now and it can do this and it's good. The phones can easily send emails and the newest models now are coming out with GPS.

      I'm going to feel a little out of touch when I return home.

    9. Re:FIOS, Baby! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      don't visit untrusted sites with IE

      Shouldn't that be don't visit any sites with IE. Shame you can't uninstall the damn thing.

    10. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      I'm a Verizon customer and I've been salivating, waiting for them to bring it to my area.

      Even though Verizon is 18-25 times the price of a Comcast connection of the same speed, and take 12-18 weeks for installation or repair?

      Disclaimer: I'm a former Verizon customer

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    11. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Lesrahpem · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make sense anymore for ISP's to offer asynchronous lines. Once upon a time most of the people on the web were just reading the content, not creating it, so asynchronous lines were fine. Now people want to blog, send large files (like family movies and pictures), post on forums, and do all kinds of things which require higher upload speeds.

      What's stupid is that my ISP won't even sell me a synchronous line even though they do offer them to businesses. I have the money for one, as well as all of the equipment needed, and I know I am within the area they offer it to. But, since I do not have a business they won't sell it to me.

    12. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Varitek · · Score: 4, Informative
      Just like most broadband service offerings, speed will be asynchronous.
      Asymmetric.
    13. Re:FIOS, Baby! by pcgabe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed.

      I'd point out the clarification, but this is Slashdot, so just about everyone here should already know this.

      But hey, it's popular to poke fun at Mr. Gates. I imagine that in 15 years, when Google is the new Evil Empire, everyone will misquote Larry Page as saying "There's no reason anyone would need to get the Universal Interface brain implant."

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    14. Re:FIOS, Baby! by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Err, what do you think that asynchronous means; at different rates.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    15. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Hast · · Score: 1

      Asynchronous means at different times.

      You could use it to describe that the phases/periods are not synchronous, ie that they are different. But this isn't the normal way you'd use it. An asynchronous connection would be more like one where the capacity varies with time.

    16. Re:FIOS, Baby! by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to feel a little out of touch when I return home.?

      Wait until you see how we've improved New Orleans.... ;^)

    17. Re:FIOS, Baby! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      but think about it.. with asynchronos data lines, you could be recieving the web page BEFORE you send the HTTP GET. Think of the improvements in latency!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    18. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wouldn't hold my breath for Verizon to remove the "no server" clause from their contract. At least not until every single one of their T1 lines no longer produces revenue for them.

      To be clear, the Verizon FIOS agreement says no fixed IPs, no serving, residential use only (which seems to preclude home office professional use). Plus "Microsoft Windows required and MSN Premium", whatever that means. Plus you must switch your voice lines to FIOS and keep at least one voice line in the agreement.

      If you discuss any of these feature needs with them the price quickly becomes $129 a month and up.

      I was waiting for FIOS too. But I'll probably wait until their pricing reflects someone using the service besides kids websurfing on a Microsoft box.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    19. Re:FIOS, Baby! by elocutio · · Score: 1

      5 megabits up is enough to run a nice little web server so long as you don't get Slashdotted or DDOS'ed.

      I've been using FiOS for several months now, and the only applications where I see a substantive difference over other broadband providers are when I'm transmitting data to/from a remote server that also has plenty of bandwidth.

      I know of very few sites where I can pull data much faster than I did with cable, probably because of limitations on the server, not on FiOS. The "experience" of the internet is likely to only improve when both ends of the server/client connection are properly ready to handle more bandwidth. I'm afraid 15-30Mb connections will have to become ubiquitous before we see a substantial improvement in this regard.

      And as to the hosting idea -- I think you may still need an asymmetric pipe. I uploaded some linux iso's to an off-site server last week. Each image is 500-600 MB. I could get really good transfer rates if I uploaded one image at a time, but by uploading all three of them in three separate FTP sessions reduced the transfer rate by a factor of three (in other words, they were sharing).

      This won't matter for the web junky looking for a better user experience, and it probably won't matter for the geek who wants to host a weblog from his mom's basement. But the residential FiOS offering does not appear to be equipped to handle respectable amounts of upload traffic.

      Note that Verizon's "business-grade" FiOS is available as a $50/mo upgrade. You can upgrade the connection speed and get up to 5 static IP's. Don't know all the details, but here is some more information.

    20. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1


      Well, if Billy Boy denies at, that certainly constitutes proof that he never said it for me.

      Zero__Kelvin: Well Mr. Gates, it seems that there is a lot of confusion over who you are. Some say you are a visionary shaping the future with your "ideas", which many call 'Embrace and Extend', while others say you say things like "Nobody will ever need more than 640k of RAM."

      Gates: I Fear there is some Uncertainty as to what I might or might not have said in my endeavors to be an industry leader, and I Doubt anyone worth their salt would say such a thing.

      Zero__Kelvin: Agreed, Mr. Gates ... but I was asking if You actually said it.

      Beavis & Butthead: Heh Heh .. He said Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt

      Next he'll be saying he never claimed the Internet would be just another fad. He will of course retort by claiming it was a misquote of something he once said in a board meeting: "...the Internet won't just be another way for us to spread FUD. We can make Windows one big conglomeration of trojan horses and use it to 0w|\| the \/\/0r!d !!!"

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    21. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, what do you think that asynchronous means; at different rates.

      Why would you make such a stupid statement without even bothering to look it up? You are an ass.

    22. Re:FIOS, Baby! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If Billy Boy denies he said it, then the onus is on those claiming he did to provide a verifiable citation for the comment. In over a dozen iterations of this discussion on Slashdot, I have yet to see a single source for the remark. If you have one, please provide it. If not, then you are just talking Invisible Pink Unicorns.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    23. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      asynchronous has been used to describe it. When I first ordered my DSL line, the package said the the "A" in "ADSL" stood for asynchronous. So, maybe they have a good reason for calling it that OR they just don't know the definition of words.

    24. Re:FIOS, Baby! by skeptictank · · Score: 1
      Hasn't fiber to the house been just around the corner for the last 10 years?

      I hope it does arrive this year, but I am not gonna hold my breath.

    25. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1



      " If Billy Boy denies he said it, then the onus is on those claiming he did to provide a verifiable citation for the comment... I have yet to see a single source for the remark.

      You are confusing a question about what someone writes with a question regarding something once said . Bill Gates counts on the ignorance of people like yourself. That being said, I never claimed he made the 640k statement, though it is easy for me to believe that he did, since I am certain he couldn't hack his way out of a wet paper bag with a samurai sword. IIRC, the internet is just a fad comment was in his tellingly lame "The Road Ahead", but I am not certain. Everything you write runs the risk of being read. What you say can always be denied a femtosecond later. Especially since people like yourself will ignore the probable in favor of any non-sequiter they can grasp onto for dear life.

      Thanks for playing the "Defend Gates" carnival game that cannot be won, though!

      Cheers!>

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    26. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OR the A in ADSL could refer to the copper wire protocol and not the comparative upstream/downstream bit rates.

      And if you don't understand what I just said, you're on the wrong website.

    27. Re:FIOS, Baby! by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      At my parents house is my old win 98 box from many years ago and it is PERFECTLY safe. It's in about 4 pieces now and being used for spare parts!

      But you are right, no matter HOW secure the box is, if someone convinces the user to do DEL *.* /Q /S /F (or whatever it is) then you still have no data left (ok, or rm -rF or whatever it is on linux)

  2. GB isn't Gb by cloudofstrife · · Score: 5, Informative

    Someone messed up while writing this article. Samsung said that they were making 16Gb (gigabit) chips, not 16GB chips. TFA: http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/ 13/0243231

    1. Re:GB isn't Gb by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 1

      Also, isn't there a problem with flash memory to where you can't write and erase that many times before the memory stops working? This seems like the kind of thing that would not be a problem in, say, an IPod, but would be a killer in a computer. Imagine if your swap drive were on flash. That thing gets written tens of thousands of times each day. Am I wrong here?

      --
      Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    2. Re:GB isn't Gb by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Actually Gb can mean the same as GB and reverse. The abreviation of bytes and bits is not welldefined. Before using either you should define it. If undefined it is assumed to be bytes.

    3. Re:GB isn't Gb by booch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bytes and bits might not have SI-defined abbreviations, but the IT/computer/tech industry is quite consistent in using 'b' for bits and 'B' for bytes. I actually see the SI prefixes used incorrectly (i.e. mbps for Mega-bits per second) much more than 'b' and 'B' mixed up.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    4. Re:GB isn't Gb by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I think you're the only one confused on this issue. It is indeed well known in the tech industry what b and B stand for - bits and bytes.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    5. Re:GB isn't Gb by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      The number of write samples has been steadily improving, and that fact, combined with an intelligent filesystem, means that it's not a problem any more. And with the lack of moving parts MTBF times should far out strip the inherent complexity of a hard drives platter and heads.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    6. Re:GB isn't Gb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. It's well defined that 'b' is bits and 'B' is bytes.

  3. Now we'll just have to wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    until some jerk hacks that pacemaker and starts setting elderly people's heartbeats to 250 BPM....

    1. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by massivefoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does raise security issues. And how much would we rely on this? What happens if your pacemaker suddenly gets a 404 error?

    2. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by cralewyth · · Score: 1

      Mine already gets such an error. Ever since I removed the batteries. The main problem is telling the 404 error from a 400 or 410 :P

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    3. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by quokkapox · · Score: 2, Funny

      until the seniors come back and hack them to pieces at 60 FPS :)

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    4. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by pookemon · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Run it on Windows and bring real meaning to the Blue Screen of Death...

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    5. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      I'm more worried about later, more advanced versions of this. Who do you trust with your access codes?

    6. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by Smidgin · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder how much you could overclock them safely with a good coolant...

    7. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      The more advanced version will be implanted in your brain after they cut your head off. Your brain will be artificially supported and all of your senses will be fake. You will not know that your world is totally artificial. You will live for hundreds of years unless of course this has already happened and we are now living in that artificial world. Rainman and people like him already have the ability to communicate with the mainframe and that explains their ability to recall and learn vast amounts of knowledge.

    8. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      until some jerk hacks that pacemaker and starts setting elderly people's heartbeats to 250 BPM....
      That's already been sorted - one encryption guy I know asked me a couple of years ago what I remembered about the Z80 from a tech college course I took instead of sport back in high school (all I could remember is having lots of registers to play with). Apparently the Z80 is still alive and well in a lot of medical gear and now there is reasonable authentication software written for those platforms to stop some jerk hacking the pacemaker now that it has remote control instead of having to dig it out to change settings.
    9. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems to work well enough with bearded men...

    10. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by Hallucienda · · Score: 1

      i was just thinking the same

    11. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by NaeRey · · Score: 0

      anything that is encriptable is decriptable. it might take two years to figure how the encription works, but in the end somebody will do it if they really want to, although by that time a smart company would change encryption... also if you noticed computers are getting powerful, which would enable a home computer with some 5Ghz processor to decrypt the code in some 2 weeks..

    12. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      some jerk hacks that pacemaker and starts setting elderly people's heartbeats to 250 BPM

      Well.. that would solve the coming medicare funding crisis...

    13. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      until some jerk hacks that pacemaker and starts setting elderly people's heartbeats to 250 BPM...

      Revision to the song: "They hacked my heart, in San Francisco...."

    14. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Well, the company might have a new model, but I don't have time for open heart surgery this week.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    15. Re:Now we'll just have to wait... by Jott42 · · Score: 1

      I know that you are joking, but just for the benefit of the curious: A pacemaker implant operation is done under local anasthetic (sp?), takes about half an hour, and the patient is awake and talking teh whole time. The patient walks into the hopsital in the morning, and walks out in the afternoon after initial checkups that all is OK.

  4. Concept exists? by cralewyth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From TFA:
    Ajax
    When you use Google Maps, the Web site doesn't pause to reload the page each time you zoom in or pan to the side, and the URL remains "maps.google.com" instead of the meaningless string of letters and numbers you see at older sites like MapQuest. Google Maps is using a new technique that Web-watcher Jesse James Garrett has dubbed Ajax, for Asynchronous JavaScript + XML. Weaving together existing technologies, Ajax will help make Web services feel more like programs that run on the user's own computer, Garrett says, releasing Internet content from the limitations of conventional Web design by reimagining the browser as an operating system.


    Surely, if the concept already exists, people know (of) it, and it's not one to know for 2006, but one already known from 2005?

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    1. Re:Concept exists? by Ben_PhotoSydney · · Score: 1

      I agree. The plethora of information and opinion pieces about Ajax over the past six months would seem to suggest that 2005 was the Ajax's year.

      --
      Ben | PhotoSydney
    2. Re:Concept exists? by m50d · · Score: 1

      The list subject is "likely to be important in 2006". Which this is.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Concept exists? by Ben_PhotoSydney · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, point taken. I can't help but think however that cralewyth's original point, that the list should be for things that haven't had a public impact yet, has some legitimacy. At the extreme one could argue that things like internal plumbing and transistors are likely to be important in 2006 but they're not in the list either.

      --
      Ben | PhotoSydney
    4. Re:Concept exists? by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

      A lot of people is making some expectatives about Ajax, all the newspapers and magazines is telling about Ajax. Why? Beause it's cool to talk about ajax today, the people wanna see what is this fantastic thing. Let's wait and see when Ajax will be applied to important things.

    5. Re:Concept exists? by the_true_cirrus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      [...] and the URL remains "maps.google.com" instead of the meaningless string of letters and numbers you see at older sites like MapQuest

      Don't get me wrong, I like Google Maps and AJAX is quite neat too (when used appropriately) but this lack of an updated query string is nothing to be proud of since it just means that users can't directly bookmark or link to the page they see once they've scrolled and zoomed around a bit. Yes, Google does provide a kind of permalink URL but it's labelled "link to this page" so the average Joe probably won't realise that that needs to be clicked before bookmarking too.

    6. Re:Concept exists? by skillet-thief · · Score: 1
      [...] and the URL remains "maps.google.com" instead of the meaningless string of letters and numbers you see at older sites like MapQuest.

      Not to mention the fact that you can just use POST and the URL doesn't change either... That ain't exactly bleeding edge, tho...

      --

      Congratulations! Now we are the Evil Empire

    7. Re:Concept exists? by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
      Yes. This concept is also used to save the drafts automatically every few minutes in gmail.

      I guess, the author wants us to see a huge potential of Ajax, that will be realized in 2006.

    8. Re:Concept exists? by duffahtolla · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of when a friend of my Mother-in-Law gave her a CD-R containing nothing but a single shortcut to C:\MAHJONG.

      You can dumb down the inteface but you'll never dumb it down enough for everybody.

  5. EMR by digitalmonkey2k1 · · Score: 1

    Ok great, electronic medical records... Lets break this down shall we?
    In case of a natural disaster, they are on a server... unless the server was the point of impact of that disaster. Then you may think distributed copies, which leads to a problem of who has the proper copy and what data gets lost during automatic updates. I seriously doubt they can even call this a method to save storage space, seeing as how even if they were served in a single local, the weekly/monthly backups would take nearly as much space. Let alone distributed backups, this is just my tangent tho... proove me wrong people.

    --
    My sausage tree didn't grow, does that make me a bad mommy?
    1. Re:EMR by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      In case of a natural disaster, they are on a server... unless the server was the point of impact of that disaster. Then you may think distributed copies, which leads to a problem of who has the proper copy and what data gets lost during automatic updates.

      Two words for you... rsync and squid. Not error proof, but with checksums and redundancy, pretty close so long as errors are not introduced at the root server.

      But wouldn't it be fun to hack the root server and make sure all your old enemies are listed as currently under treatment for syphilis and Dick Chafing (not to be confused with Dick Cheney, which is much worse). ;-)

      - Greg

    2. Re:EMR by digitalmonkey2k1 · · Score: 1

      As noted, they still rely on a root server to keep track of proper data updates. I just dont think this is the solution they are looking for at this time.

      --
      My sausage tree didn't grow, does that make me a bad mommy?
    3. Re:EMR by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

      For this to work properly would require all hospitals to agree on a standardisation of medical data, currently its really up to the operating environment of the hospital to decide what their records are.

      Ideally all data would be moved out of hospitals into Datacentres and hospitals linking in, its really the only way it can work, having each hospital keeping their data & then transmitting it to a national database would only allow for errors.

      The buisness im in is working supporting GP's & Specialists and similar systems have been thought of before, so patients can have their entire medical history accessed by any GP. There is a lot of criticism of the idea because of privacy concerns and plus its bad for buisness for GP's if their patents can go and see anyone else and take their history with them.

    4. Re:EMR by tim_uk · · Score: 4, Informative
      I do EMR for a living.

      In case of a natural disaster, they are on a server

      No, mine aren't. They are on multiple site, geographically dispersed, diverse routed synchronous data arrays in secure and hardened data centres.

      who has the proper copy and what data gets lost during automatic updates

      There are 16 "proper copies" of each instance. Each instance represents a doctors surgery, a hospital trust*, an ambulance trust etc. There are no losses during updates, it's designed to be fully available and resilient in the event of the total loss of a datacentre.

      (*trust is UK medical system speak for a local area and may contain one or all of the above)

      I seriously doubt they can even call this a method to save storage space

      Agreed. Last time I looked it was projected to be +9Pb. I have around 1Pb to look after here.

      the weekly/monthly backups would take nearly as much space

      The datacentres are synchronised. No old-fashioned "backups" take place. See my first point. However, non-patient related data is taken to tape daily and offsited.

      It's a serious undertaking. ;-)

      I laughed out loud when I saw that Bush had allocated $125m for EMR in the USA. This will cost BILLIONS.

    5. Re:EMR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very flawed argument indeed.

      Firstly - does your bank hold all your real money in Earth coins? So - if the earthquake hits your bank, are you going to accept that you have no worldly possessions? Are they going to allow that? The technology's existed for aeons, medicine's just been a bit slow.

      Secondly - in what way is the catastrophe you've described differ from there being a fire in the paper healthcare records library of your hospital?

    6. Re:EMR by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      "No, mine aren't. They are on multiple site, geographically dispersed, diverse routed synchronous data arrays in secure and hardened data centres."

      If I was a hacker, seeing such a large attack surface for obtaining your data would put a huge smile on my face.

      As you probably know from your job, the better you protect that data from being LOST, the easier it is to be STOLEN actually if someone finds the weakest link.

      I'd start with stone age techniques like visiting each of the server clusters claiming I'm the electrician and gotta fix something I was called for.

    7. Re:EMR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $125m! Hah, in the UK our government budgeted sterling 4 billion 3 years ago for our EHR project (the 'National Programme for IT'), and that budget already looks woefully inadequate...

    8. Re:EMR by tim_uk · · Score: 1

      The risk of stolen EMR's is not at the data level, it's at the end user level. That's much harder to prevent.

  6. Someone hasn't done their research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last fall, Apple brought NAND chips into the hands of the public with the 2GB and 4GB iPod nano music players. Capacities will only increase. Samsung has announced that its 16GB NAND chip will be on the market before the end of 2006.

    Anyone remember this one from a few days ago?

  7. Re:Popular Mechanics? by cralewyth · · Score: 1

    What kind of a concept are these 'screwdrivers' and 'hammers' you speak of?

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
  8. 4 they forgot: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP): Think of it as DRM for your display. Microsoft will be supporting this technology into the upcoming Vista operating system and others may follow as well.

    Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI): As seen on the new Intel Macs, EFI is an upgraded BIOS specification as created by Intel. EFI allows for hardware drivers to remain in the firmware and operate independently of operating system. The EFI can also detect and select operating systems, eliminating the need for a separate boot loader.

    Simple Sharing Extensions (SSE): While this was created in 2005, Microsoft hopes for SSE to gain momentum and compete with the RSS standard in 2006. SSE extends the RSS 2.0 specification from unidirectional to bidirectional information flows. Microsoft even released it under the Creative Commons license, the same license covering RSS 2.0.

    1. Re:4 they forgot: by BrynM · · Score: 1
      Simple Sharing Extensions (SSE): While this was created in 2005, Microsoft hopes for SSE to gain momentum and compete with the RSS standard in 2006. SSE extends the RSS 2.0 specification from unidirectional to bidirectional information flows. Microsoft even released it under the Creative Commons license, the same license covering RSS 2.0.
      My first thought: "This sounds like a future MS Server attack vector to me". Please Microsoft (I know there are a few of you here), think of security first when you implement this in IIS. You don't need another black eye and I don't need another headache. Call me troll, call me jaded, call me disillusioned, call me a realist - I don't care. Just please implement it right.
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:4 they forgot: by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Possibly. Good luck finding a motherboard with EFI, though.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:4 they forgot: by cdcarter · · Score: 1

      That's only three things...

      --
      "Love is like a trampoline, first it's like "SWEET!!" then it's like *BLAMM!*"
    4. Re:4 they forgot: by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      That's true today, but with Vista supporting it, it seems many manufactures will license it from Intel.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  9. BAN? by smoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Radio controlled pacemaker? This will have to show up on 'CSI' pretty soon then. Would _you_ want a pacemaker that someone could re-program wirelessly? Say someone sitting behind you on the train/bus/subway/airplane?

    Or maybe they use some strong security... WEP anyone? Now that would be freaking hilarious. Security Alert: "We regret to inform you that your heart implant is vulnerable to a wireless attack. The risk is mitigated by the fact the attacker must be within 5 feet of you, and own a laptop with special radio components that can be built using plans freely available on the internet for about $26 in parts.Please do not worry, sue us, or be surprised if you die when your enemies figure this out."

    --
    "But actually trying to use m4 as a general-purpose langage would be deeply perverse" --ESR
    1. Re:BAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, if they could get hold of a big enough magnet and stick that behind you, the same problem would occur. Why break the protocol, if you can just break the computer? You're only trying to destroy it anyways...

    2. Re:BAN? by Ben_PhotoSydney · · Score: 1

      Yeah - you have been heartattaXX0red.

      --
      Ben | PhotoSydney
    3. Re:BAN? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Radio controlled pacemaker?
      They exist.
      Would _you_ want a pacemaker that someone could re-program wirelessly?
      Better than digging it out.
      Or maybe they use some strong security... WEP anyone?
      Obviously it would be and has been taken more seriously than that.
    4. Re:BAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Obviously it would be and has been taken more seriously than that."

      Yeah, sure, because industries have a strong history of taking security seriously and having their designs rigorously tested and evaluated by security professionals before rolling them out. I'm willing to bet that whatever security they've incorporated relies largely on obscurity, not actual security principles.

    5. Re:BAN? by lifebouy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Until, "It's a sad day for America. The President of the United States died last night. Sources are still sketchy, but the cause of death appears to be related to a Denial of Service attack aimed at the President's artificial heart. More news as it comes in..."

      --
      Drop me a line at:
      Key ID: 0x54D1D809
    6. Re:BAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI have a shortlist of 4 billion potential suspects.

  10. Pedestrian Protection System (PPS) by method77 · · Score: 0

    I don't thing this is much of a help "if you smack a pedestrian, the hood is automatically raised to cushion his landing on the engine block". What?

    1. Re:Pedestrian Protection System (PPS) by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      well, if you're that pedestrian, I'd certainly want for my head to land on the bonnet that's been raised, rather than impacting on an ordinary bonnet and thus hitting a solid engine block...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:Pedestrian Protection System (PPS) by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I as a pedestrian would rather these assholes that seem to have thier cellphone surgically attached to thier heads pay more attention to the road. But no...we need more expensive tech to make things safer since the person behind the wheel never learned how to drive.

    3. Re:Pedestrian Protection System (PPS) by marciot · · Score: 1

      > if you smack a pedestrian, the hood is automatically raised to cushion his landing on the engine block.

      I'm not sure I can visualize how this would be safer, unless the hood was hinged at the front. With the hood near the window, as is most common, wouldn't this at worst just cause said pedestrian to strike the leading edge of the hood as it was coming up (painful) or catapult the pedestrian into the air (just as painful)?

      -- Marcio

  11. 3 tech ideas for drivers by erbmjw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Driving is a privilege not a right - people should not have technology fill in for their lack if skill and/or concern. I used to drive professionaly, transports {tractor trailer}, school buses, furniture trucks, courier vans, taxi, etc and over the years I have taken 9 PDI { professional driver improvement} courses. More people should have greater concern for their driving habits and more people should have their liscences revoked for their thoughtless/reckless behaviour. It's not that I'm against technology to help drivers, it's that studies say that many drivers are now using these systems as crutches. Bah Humbug - just had to get that off my chest :(

    1. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by cralewyth · · Score: 1

      Another interesting problem, is that people rely on the technology that is there, instead of being more careful. Ever hear about those tests where drivers ended up worse WITH ABS brakes, rather than without?

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    2. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear erbmjw,

            This letter is to inform you that your spelling license has been revoked for the creative spelling of the word "license".

            Department of Orthography.

    3. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "people should have greater concern for their driving habits and more people should have their liscences revoked for their thoughtless/reckless behaviour" Ditto here! I've been hit 4 times this past year- 3 of those times by "soccer moms" in their SUV's talking on the phone while driving, the fourth time by someone too impatient with the road construction in town (30 mph spd. lmt.!) to merge with predominate lane (had to get to Wal-Mart quick) and was hit-and-run incident. People nowdays on the road have no concept of common curtesy and respect- anymore it is "hooray for me, and f*sk you! I have decided to start carrying a rocket launcher when I drive-F*sk it- Darwin's list always needs nominees!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been hit 4 times this past year- 3 of those times by "soccer moms" in their SUV's talking on the phone while driving, the fourth time by someone too impatient with the road construction in town

      Funny, I've never been hit by anybody in over 10 years, and I drive a lot.

      You've been hit once every 3 months last year? something tells me you don't know how to drive...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by Willy+Wong · · Score: 1

      He never said he was driving when he was hit.

    6. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by bsane · · Score: 1

      Then maybe he was never taught how to cross a street safely? Someone who is on foot or on a bike is still responsible for safely interacting with other traffic.

    7. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was hit 3 times on the 2 last years. Parked! All the times, I was even out of the car.

      Annedotal evidence. It is kind of stupid to get conclusions from that.

    8. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by analog_line · · Score: 1

      Until the American government decides to provide decent mass transit for more than the pittance of areas that now have it, people who aren't godo drivers are going to still need to drive. Get on the horn to your local elected officials and make some noise.

    9. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by rts008 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Something tells me you are a complete idiot.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    10. Re:3 tech ideas for drivers by TheBracket · · Score: 1
      Someone who is on foot or on a bike is still responsible for safely interacting with other traffic.

      This is very true. I walk almost everywhere (my eyesight is such that while I can legally drive, I prefer not to because I feel very unsafe to both myself and other road users doing so), and the vast majority of times I'm safe as long as I take basic precautions when crossing roads. Back when I did drive, I was actually hit by a pedestrian once. I was pulled up at a blind intersection, and my car (crappy, 1983 Vauxhall Cavalier) had stalled. As I tried to restart the beast, a jogger ran around the corner, saw the car, and leaped into the air - landing on my windshielf. He actually threatened to sue me, but the fact that my car was placed normally on the road with the engine off finally persuaded him that maybe his scuffed up knee wasn't my fault.

      It works both ways, though. I was hit by a car last year, even though I was on the sidewalk (its driver misjudged a corner, and mounted the sidewalk - fortunately, I wasn't hurt beyond minor scratches. The driver sped away anyway).

      --
      Lead developer, http://wisptools.net
  12. Re:Popular Mechanics? by Ben_PhotoSydney · · Score: 1

    They were the "killer apps" of 320 BC.

    --
    Ben | PhotoSydney
  13. anyone remember old BIOS bugs? by carl0ski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By transmitting data to and receiving instructions from nearby base stations, BAN chips can reprogram your heartbeat at your doctor's office or make a diagnosis from a bedside wireless monitor at home.

    i find this scary there was a horrifying bugs in old computers that could be used remotely to purposes increase the CPU clock rate to rediculous levels resulting in serious damage.


    Since a dead CPU is the heart of a dead Computer
    i wouldnt want dead heart in my body

  14. Human Area Network (HAN) by p0 · · Score: 1

    How about the so called HAN that was hyped by RedTacton?

    www.redtacton.com/en

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Human Area Network (HAN) by ilyanep · · Score: 1

      Human Area Network -- sounds like what they used to find the Question to the Answer to Life, The Universe, and Everything

      --
      ~Ilyanep
      To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
    2. Re:Human Area Network (HAN) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the important subsets of the BAN/HAN!
      FAN: Frontal area network,
      RAN: Rear area network,
      CAN: colon area network,
      DAN: dermal area network,
      MAN: medial area network,
      TAN: thorax area network,
      VAN: ventrical area network

      (don't you just love making up acronyms)

  15. Re:Popular Mechanics? by ceeam · · Score: 1

    Screwdrivers?! I don't think so.

  16. Re:Popular Mechanics? by Ben_PhotoSydney · · Score: 1

    But hammers certainly.

    --
    Ben | PhotoSydney
  17. funny people by linforcer · · Score: 1, Funny

    From the article:
     
      Likewise, Microsoft says metadata searches will be integrated into its Vista OS, which ships later this year.
     
    Funny people, that.

  18. Click here! by ceeam · · Score: 5, Funny

    I
    predict
    that
    fitting
    one-page-articles

    ...[Next>] ...
    on
    one
    web
    page

    ... [Buy now!]...
    will
    be
    hot
    in
    2006.

    ... [Argh!!! Your computer is infected!!! 8-[~~ ]...

    Ah,
    wishful
    thinking

    ...

  19. In other news.... by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

    Clueless management of a secure OS makes it less secure than an insecure OS fully patched up and properly administered.
    WELL DUH!

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
  20. Human Area Network (HAN) by cralewyth · · Score: 1

    Exactly how does that fit with HAN SOLO? Networks usually consist of more than one....

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
  21. PAN has already been used by Macka · · Score: 1
    I prefer Personal Area Network (PAN), myself
    I remember reading about PAN's a good 10 years ago I would guess. It was to do with a technology that IBM were playing around with, passing a current and exchanging data through the subcutaneous layer under the skin. The idea was that you could have gadgets like a smart business card attached to your skin somewhere that would transmit your data and receive others. You would walk around a meeting shaking hands with people, linking your PAN with their PAN and your respective business cards would exchange information.

    I don't know what happened to that technology in the end. Its not visible today so they must've shelved it. But IBM owns patent rights to the use of the term Personal Area Network, of that I'm sure.

    1. Re:PAN has already been used by LMariachi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But IBM owns patent rights to the use of the term Personal Area Network, of that I'm sure.

      No you're not. Usage of specific terms is governed by trademark, not patent. If they have a patent on that particular method, no one else can use it (without a license) no matter what they decide to call it. If they have a trademark for "Personal Area Network," then no one else can use that phrase for anything in the same market space. With a 4-digit UID you ought to know the difference between patent, trademark, & copyright by now.

    2. Re:PAN has already been used by bsane · · Score: 1

      With a 4-digit UID you ought to know the difference between patent, trademark, & copyright by now.

      With a 5-digit UID you ought to know that most people will _never_ grasp the difference.

    3. Re:PAN has already been used by Macka · · Score: 1
      With a 4-digit UID you ought to know the difference between patent, trademark, & copyright by now
      Thats what I get for rushing a post 3 mins before I have to leave the house. You're quite right of cause.

    4. Re:PAN has already been used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Personal Area Integrated Network myself ;-)

    5. Re:PAN has already been used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had a to have a pace maker, having it receive wireless commands would be something I'd be scared about. But I like the idea of maybe having something in my bed that would monitor me while I sleep and take action if needed. You could call it a BED PAN.

    6. Re:PAN has already been used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With a 5-digit UID you ought to know that most people will _never_ grasp the difference.

      Yes, and the smart-asses started with the 6-digit UID's!

  22. Late middle ages, then. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Late middle ages, apparently. I'd never thought to wonder when the screwdriver was invented. Thanks for the prompt.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  23. Cheap comments by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Total worth of 2 cents:

    ------------
    - Driver-Monitoring System

    As demonstrated earlier by Mercedes, here is one more next-gen driving system in your car that can fail in unexpected situations.

    No wonder that for mission critical systems in space ships, NASA still uses previous generation computers.

    - Body Area Network (BAN)

    Perfect marketing strategy: call little electornic devices you implant in your body "ban". Cue in music from the Matrix.

    There will be of course, major privacy concerns about this (imagine someone waving a small device around you and obtaining full personal info and medical records).

    - IPTV

    2006 is a bit earlier to call it a win for IPTV and a bit late to call it a "new concept" as well.

    - Metadata

    Again, why the heck is this called a "new" concept? OSX had it before 2006, office (and other apps) had it for years, but most importantly, Internet had it for ages and is already sick of it and deprecated it.

    Metadata in that context is just poor man's data indexing. Search engines in the past used metadata because they didn't have the brains and power to read the pages themselves, now Desktop search engines need that hack until smarter algorithms are developed.

    While I'm all for it, it's just too old to be new again.

    - NAND Flash Memory

    Uh 16 GB? Nope, 16Gb, err 2GB in other words. That said with those prices and sizes, you can still have a 2.5 inch hard disk sized Flash block at around 200GB capacity.

    Which will cost roughly $9000.

    - Nanoparticle Batteries / Micro Fuel Cells

    We've had revolutionary laptop and mobile batteries coming every next year and still nothing. I'd rather wait and see this time, instead of trusting the hype again.

    - SPIT

    Right, we have new tech concept for spamming. Thanks for mentioning it folks, just rub it in, won't ya.

    - EMR (electronic medical records)

    Hehe, wait until we have the "600 000 medical records lost (or stolen) from hospital X" news, following similar trends for other important electronic data we see nowadays.

    - Coal Gasification

    I prefer mine hard, but ok I have no clue about this anyway :) I just use electricity...

    - Perpendicular Storage

    They missed the more important news. It's not perpendicular storage, which is great but which most of us shouldn't care about, but what it enables and how it changes the HDD designs.

    2.5 inch designs are set to replace the current 3.5 inch drives on desktops (Seagate pioneers this move). the avdantages are:

    - much lower noise
    - higher rotation speed
    - much faster access time and reading speed
    - much less electricity spent (I think around 5-6 times less than current generation 3.5 inch disks)
    - they are a lot smaller and look pretty cute (yep I know I know..)

    With that you can have reasonably priced desktop 2.5 disks with capacity 160GB.

    I for one, welcome our new... ah forget it.
    ------------

    1. Re:Cheap comments by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      Hehe, wait until we have the "600 000 medical records lost (or stolen) from hospital X" news, following similar trends for other important electronic data we see nowadays.

      Reminds me of this article. It's backup data, but data is data.

      Our lives are being integrated into and eventually controlled by electrons, the very things we sought to control.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:Cheap comments by scdeimos · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'll see your 2 cents and raise you half a cent...
      No wonder that for mission critical systems in space ships, NASA still uses previous generation computers.
      There's other reasons for that, including: proven technology, easier to shield against radiation, and money-poor budgets requiring re-use of hardware.
      There will be of course, major privacy concerns about this (imagine someone waving a small device around you and obtaining full personal info and medical records).
      These devices won't contain medical records, but I'd hate some script kiddie to start playing Wheel of Fortune with my wireless pacemaker.
      Again, why the heck is this called a "new" concept? OSX had it before 2006, office (and other apps) had it for years, but most importantly, Internet had it for ages and is already sick of it and deprecated it.
      Yes, metadata is an old concept. It was built into BeFS and other operating systems before it.
      Hehe, wait until we have the "600 000 medical records lost (or stolen) from hospital X" news, following similar trends for other important electronic data we see nowadays.
      How about blackmail of EMR's dating back to 2003? Not really a hot topic for 2006.
    3. Re:Cheap comments by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      I never got a single spam for Vicodin (or any other medication) until I had my wisdom teeth pulled two years ago. I told the doctor I didn't want it (and didn't even get it filled), but he wrote me a prescription for it. Two days later the spam started. It arrives at my trashy public email to this day.

      I've seriously considered forwarding that entire account to the doctor.

    4. Re:Cheap comments by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I've got this straight: You went to a dentist/oral surgeon to have your wisdom teeth removed. You said you didn't want any Vicodin but the person who treated you wrote a prescription anyway. You never filled that prescription. Just how does your personal email address enter into the mix? None of my physicians have ever asked for my personal email address.

      I don't see the link betweeen getting your wisdom teeth removed and the appearance of Vicodin spam in your inbox being anything other than pure coincidence.

      Please fill-in the missing details if you have something that ties the doctor to the spam....

    5. Re:Cheap comments by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Databases get mined/combined, and I'm sure the combination of my name/email was out there somewhere waiting to meet name/vicodin. If it was a coincidence, it was a damned coincidental one. I mean, no medication spam at all (and very little spam in general, ~4/week), and then suddenly up to 3 vicodin spam a day?

      I noticed something similar when I bought my house, now I get tons and tons of remortgage and mortgage insurance spam (to the point where I finally installed some filters, false positives be damned), and even worse, I get real physical junkmail of the same, sometimes 3 or 4 in a week. The only junkmail I ever got before that was the occasional (1 a month or so) credit card offer.

      I'm normally not even a paranoid person, but those sorts of things are just too convenient to be pure coincidence. There's just something insidious about advertising that makes me assume the worst about it.

      And as for the doctor, I'm fairly trusting of them (two of my closest friends are a pharmacist and a dentist, albeit one that doesn't take out wisdom teeth)... until they recommend something really stupid like taking vicodin. Prescribing an ineffective narcotic painkiller with bad side effects where an anti-inflammatory (or chewing some ice the next day, for that matter) would have done better with no side effects? Ehh... He did a competent enough job getting the giant sideways teeth out, but I'm not taking his medication advice.

      Though I did claim all the remains of said teeth and amuse myself the next day by reassembling them bit by bit with super glue.

  24. Heartbeat by bmgoau · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What happens when a deprived person brute-forces your wireless pace-maker and sets it to extreme mode?

    Of course the chances of this are slim to none and the benifits of these emerging technologies peobly outweight the risks, as long as adequate debugging measures are taken during the process of writing their firmware.

    I always imagined a time in the near future, where the implimentation of technology into the human body would happen slowly, and thus allow for adaption. When someone screams out 2006 "Year of the Cyborb" one needs to remeber that hearing aids, and pace makers have been around for a very long time. Of course, now it is only a matter of time before electronic prehipherals become something of a "i do/i dont" in society.

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Moving parts? by Colourspace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FLASH has NO moving parts, not FEWER than hard disk technology?

    1. Re:Moving parts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FLASH has NO moving parts, THEREFORE FEWER than hard disk technology

      C'mon, don't be childish ;)

    2. Re:Moving parts? by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Just asking the question in case I was missing something everyone 'cept me knew..!

  27. Heart attack waiting to happen by Hecatonchires · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Havent read the article.

    Is there security on that? You know someone will walk through a crowd with a portable transmitter, setting everyone's pacemaker to 'off'. Some people are just antisocial. (Me, I'm cynical)

    --

    Yay me!

    1. Re:Heart attack waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same argument goes for guns...

    2. Re:Heart attack waiting to happen by Hast · · Score: 1

      Is there security on that?
      No of course there's no security on that. I mean, just because we have been able to make proper encryption and authentication for the last 30 years doesn't mean we'd want to put that into a pacemaker. What ridiculous thing will they propose next: Passwords for computers? Launch codes for nuclear missiles? PIN codes for your ATM?

    3. Re:Heart attack waiting to happen by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

      I'll bet the current generation don't need passwords. Aren't they modified through induction? I can just see the first new models not having it, and a giant scandal.

      --

      Yay me!

  28. Are you shitting me?! by necro2607 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "By transmitting data to and receiving instructions from nearby base stations, BAN chips can reprogram your heartbeat at your doctor's office"...

    Umm.. so.. this straight up gives you the ability to kill someone using home-made tech. How long until someone steals the "doctor-only" equipment, reverse engineers it, and suddenly schematics/code are written up? I can just imagine the possibilities, and they are NOT worth the convenience.

    Nice powerful transmitter to set all in-range pacemakers to 2 beats per minute... grab tickets to the Superbowl... now maybe our wirelessly-configured pacemaker isn't so convenient. The most disturbing thing is, it's obvious you could transmit these lethal configuration signals completely undetected. You could commit murder to no end in that manner and NEVER be detected, or even suspected.

    Fucking unbelievable.

    1. Re:Are you shitting me?! by cdcarter · · Score: 1

      PKI authentication?

      --
      "Love is like a trampoline, first it's like "SWEET!!" then it's like *BLAMM!*"
    2. Re:Are you shitting me?! by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure that you'd have to successfully hack the security protections to harm somebody with this. Maybe somebody who knows could comment on what a very high power signal tuned to the right frequency could do to the circuitry connected to this internal antenna? Could you deliver enough power to fry it? Maybe the processor would be protected but the signal amplification structures fused and thus, at the least, forcing an operation to replace the unit?

    3. Re:Are you shitting me?! by Jott42 · · Score: 1

      You could possible fry it, the same way you can fry any radio reciever. But the problem is that due to the reflection of the radio wave at the body surface, and the high attenuation of the body tissues, you would have to generate a very high power signal at the transmitter. That transmitter would not be small, and would probably generate other biological hazards too. And even if you did fry the radio reciever, the inductive link, which is the common one in use today, would still work. And if that one is also broken, pacemakers have a security fallback using permanent magnetic fields. (That is one of the reasons why pacemaker patients should take care with magnets/electronics.)

  29. Ye Ol Brand Names by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "I prefer Personal Area Network (PAN), myself."

    Agreed. Much better than wearing a old school deoderant brand, IMO. Of course, it does have a certain appeal in the slang. Maybe you could call these people "k-lined" or something. You know... Ed was K-Lined with a pacemaker. Come on... Klined. BANned... IRC... Wireless...

    Ok, I'll shut up now.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Ye Ol Brand Names by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      While PAN was first, I prefer BAN especially when dealing with hospitalized persons. Something about a PAN in bed... just doesn't sound right! *rimshot*

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  30. Driving is a priviliage by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

    Drive is a privilege. But if you think that technology is not already making up for poor driving skills, then you are mistaken. What do you call power steering, power brakes, and automatic transmissions? How about artificial lighting to make up for our species generally poor night vision?

    1. Re:Driving is a priviliage by erbmjw · · Score: 1

      Power steering, power brakes and artificial lighting (ie headlights) do not in general take away from driving skills - in fact they all enhance driving control without signifigantly reducing the skill required.
      Power steering and brakes generally mean that the driver requires less strength not less skill, artificial lighting allows people to drive in conditions that we otherwise should/could not.

    2. Re:Driving is a priviliage by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

      Strength is a skill. I can be learned and trained for to the full potential of the individual. Watch someone skilled hand/eye coordination but low in strength attempt parallel parking with manual steering. Then watch them with power steering.

      And for the lighting, thank you. You made my point. Artificial lighting enhances our seeing skills so that we can drive in conditions that we ordinarily should not. Sometimes even artificial lighting is not enough. My wife, for example, has terrible depth perception at night even with artificial lighting.

  31. Re:BAN? No, Technophobia by GenieGenieGenie · · Score: 1

    Following your logic, we should ban anything useful that could be used to kill a person. Let's see, where do we start? Knives? Axes? Baseball bats? Crowbars? Darts (put on your poison of choice)? Syringes and needles (see previous)? Cars? Gasoline and lighters? Fact is, there are many usefull things that could be used to harm people, or to kill them. It's called murder. Of course murdering with a knife could be done as discreetly as killing your victim with a radio-programmable pacemaker, except that in the latter case, defending the victim is orders of magnitude easier. The only difference between my examples and these pacemakers, are that they involve technology, which, as we all know, should be feared and prevented from being implemented in modern society.

  32. Maybe they're counting the cap? by RossumsChild · · Score: 1

    "Durr, this key has a top, and that's a moving part, right?"

    [sigh]

  33. Broken bookmarking != good by VENONA · · Score: 1

    From the article (Ajax):
    "When you use Google Maps, the Web site doesn't pause to reload the page each time you zoom in or pan to the side, and the URL remains "maps.google.com" instead of the meaningless string of letters and numbers you see at older sites like MapQuest."

    So according to Popular Mechanics, breaking Web bookmarking is now a feature. I like apps that break bookmarking about as much as I like apps that break the back button, style the scroll bar (usually in a way that would have a bad affect on usability), and/or write to my browser's status bar.

    OK, the speed of Google Maps is a Good Thing, but everything comes at a cost. The cost, in this case, is pretty high. Breaking bookmarks breaks sharing, and ease of use for single users.

    --
    What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    1. Re:Broken bookmarking != good by djparker · · Score: 1

      For the record: With Google maps you can click on "Link to this page" to get a static link to a map (location + zoom level).

      --
      Dave
  34. LOTS of things break bookmarks. by syntax · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ajax is not the first thing to break bookmarks. Hell, POST DATA, used very regularly, will break your bookmarks as well. Plus, google maps still gives you a dedicated link you can click on which will reload the page with the real link if you really need to bookmark it or send it to others.

  35. BAN + DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A voice in your ear says: "Possible copyright violation detected. Pending further investigation, we have shut off your pacemaker."

  36. Well, I have a question ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    I prefer Personal Area Network (PAN), myself.

    Does this mean that a man with erectile dysfunction might be implanted with a peter PAN?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Well, I have a question ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Personal Area Network (PAN), myself.

      Technically, embedded medical devices are more likely to be using the Personal Area Information Network standard (PAIN)...

  37. Like The Core movie! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like in the beginning of The Core movie.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  38. Wow! by sebastinator · · Score: 1

    The human population is on a straight line of technical developpement that is really impressive! I read in "Science et Vie" that the blind people becomes to see, that the paralyzed people can learn to walk again and a lot of stuff like that. I think we should have "espoir" into the technology and I'm sure that if you read this, you think the same thing! And now, the can repair the life itself where any medidal intervention was possible before! The coolest thing in that is that it is because os the computer science, the same science that give us all the possibilyty to navigate on the Web! Thanks Eintein! It is a part because of you! ___ Sebastinator.. Thanks for visiting my web site...

    --
    Thanks for visiting my Web site! Post your comments on my forum!
  39. .. and a whole new twist on .. by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    .. catching a virus :-)

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
  40. coming home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait till you see how much 98% of the country *doesn't* have insanely high rents, how much food *doesn't* cost, how *cheap* gas is even after wars and hurricanes, and what a "multicultural society" looks like that has zero active control over its borders (think crime like you wouldn't believe and half the radio stations are spanish now, and every time you have to use phone support you get asked if you speak english before anything else happens). Oh ya, you'll rediscover how huge the US is and how cool it still can be, near tropics to arctic inside the same nation, two ocean frontage, and one sea (3 if you count the arctic ocean), and there's still a whopper amount of good lookin' girls. And you can drive big cars, and some of them even are starting to get acceptable mileage now.

    The good, the bad and the ugly, if you have been gone for some years it will be a mini culture shock.

  41. work smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not harder. How hard can it be to be a legal business??? simple paperwork crap. Register a corporation (your choice of type) in Delaware for 50 bucks and call yourself a consultant. Done. It has a lot of other tax advantages as well then, including your business class high speed synchronomous line then. Go ahead and play their silly game, everyone else does. You don't really think wealthy people actually pay a lot of taxes do you? The middle class folks who aren't incorporated pay the bulk of the taxes in this nation, wealthy folks are incorporated and use trusts, they get to deduct most everything, or transfer it, or delay it, or whatever, the same way big corps milk the system. It's setup for THEM, so just buy and sign your way into the "club". Immediate fringe bennies like getting your high speed connection.

  42. Re: I'll bet... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Funny, I've never been hit by anybody in over 10 years, and I drive a lot.

    I'll bet that you live in a more rural area, and the GP lives in a more urban one. I dont know if there is research to support this, but I would bet that as you increase the number of drivers in a limited area, you increase the chance of a mishap.
     
    I have certianly noticed this after growing up in a small town, and moving to a medium sized city. In the small town even as a teenager I never even had a close call. Wheras I am a much better driver now, and drive a smaller car rather then a pickup, but I still have had several close calls in the past 5 years.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  43. Symmetric, not Synchronous... by billstewart · · Score: 1
    If you're asking for synchronous lines, they'd get confused. You sound like you're really talking about symmetric vs. asymmetric lines. It still does make sense for them to offer them, because the technology is cheaper, even though there are occasional people who want more upstream bandwidth - usually they'll get cheaper service by selling them a faster asymmetric service.

    But what do you mean by "My ISP"? Do you mean your cable modem company, or do you mean some DSL company that you're using, or some DSL company your telco has a deal with?

    Cable modem service really is highly asymmetric technology, and when they deploy faster services for businesses it's usually either DSL or a fat private-line access of some sort, which they'd typically deploy equipment for into heavily-business areas, not heavily-residential areas (if you're in a suburb, your local corner store probably can't get high-end business lines from the cableco either, just DSL.)

    DSL services come in many flavors of symmetric and asymmetric, and most of the symmetric versions top out at 1.1 or 1.5 Mbps, and only if you're close enough to the telco office - I live somewhere between 11000 and 16000 feet from my telco, depending on which telco tech you believe, and I can only get SDSL up to 384kbps, while 768 fails - but the ADSL flavors generally get better distance, so I'm running on antique 1544/384 service until I get around to upgrading to 3 Mbps.

    384 kbps is a *lot* of upstream bandwidth for a home user. Unless you're file-sharing, or trying to ship out Linux distributions, or running a business that ships lots of graphical data to prospective customers, you're not going to keep it very full. Business video-conferencing, for instance, typically uses 320-384kbps of video data, which expands to 400-450 after adding IP headers, but that's the kind of image you get from a $5-10,000 Polycom system; a $29 webcam is more likely to run 128kbps or less. VOIP runs as much as 80kbps if you're using uncompressed voice, so it can be nice to have 384 instead of just 128 upstream, but it's not critical. Blogging and posting on forums don't use any significant upstream bandwidth - you probably don't type faster than 100 WPM, which is about 100 bps, so maybe if you wrap a lot of web decoration around it you need 300 baud upstream. (If you're filesharing, then yes, you can soak up unlimited upstream bandwidth, especially if you're using BitTorrent, which is designed to use bandwidth aggressively.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  44. Wires through the skin by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that more wireless devices haven't already been in widespread body usage. One of the hard problems is a simple idea: getting a signal to and from something in the body (like a brain implant) through a wire that penetrates the skin. It's hard to make it so an infection doesn't start around the hole that the wire is passing through.

    Wireless would bypass this completely. Put the implant under the skin and transmit signals through the skin. No break in the skin that could let an infection in.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  45. IPTV makes sense for me... by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
    because, life is hell when I have to travel to some countries where watching TV is impossible (even in good hotels).

    Overall, good summary!

  46. Re: I'll bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1895 there were only two cars in the whole state of Ohio. They collided.