Slashdot Mirror


User: DTC-Bob

DTC-Bob's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7

  1. SCOTUS = GOMER on US Supreme Court Expected Political Ad Transparency · · Score: 1

    SCOTUS = GOMER PYLE: "Suprise, Suprise, Suprise!" [sic] How naieve can a group of (theoretically) smart people be?

  2. 1PS: One Pixel at a time!! on Next iPhone — Front-Facing Camera, A4 Processor · · Score: 1

    New Feature: AT&T will support 1PS: 1 Pixel Per Second!! Who needs 4G? Who cares: Apple is the new BORG.... Time to move the borg from Bill to Steve...

  3. Re:The status quo on Major ISPs Seek To Lower Broadband Definition · · Score: 1

    Can Sweden annex Denver?

  4. Re:Redhat? on IBM Germany Leaving Vista for Linux · · Score: 1

    IBM put $50MM into the Novell/SuSE deal -- presumably to ensure that SuSE remained stable for their mainframe Linux offerings. I am a bit of a SuSE advocate, so I am also surprised since SuSE is originally from Germany... Who knows? Bob

  5. Tridge is huge on Tridge wins 2005 Free Software Award · · Score: 1

    I worked off and on with Tridge at Linuxcare, then one degree of separation with work later on (Samba rocks). He is very deserving, and kudos for his view on most wordly and out-of-wordly things. DTC-Bob

  6. Re:13 years for what on Suse Linux Founder Exits Novell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was very close to Suse here in the US prior to their acquisition by Novell. I worked with them closely, and we were even called out as a Suse success story on the road show.... Let's all remember that SuSE CHOSE to sell their company to Novell. No one had a gun to their head (although speculation was that some thought the market was *going* to be the gun...)... The founders, I am sure, did nicely, thank you. Bob

  7. A look at the other side! on Death Penalty For Hackers? · · Score: 1

    Lets take a look at the other side. While I agree that on a micro level violent crime is more egregious than hacking. But what do we do with the hacker that brings down -- lets say -- a hospital's power supply and someone dies? Or opens (another) hole in our national defense to some bad types? Do we make the distinction between someone who pulls the trigger versus someone who enables the trigger (potentially multiple times)? If we look outside of the violence, if a hacker causes *billions* in damage -- that is certainly a LOT more economic damage than the typical death row type... I know good hackers to be generally amongst the most gifted coders. They might do well to come out from behind their machines and observe the damage, loss, and pain they cause. Having 'fun' and claiming the black kudos needs to be tempered with the reality of the havoc they inflict -- even if not intentionally. Personally I am against the death penalty. But at some point this 'fun' needs to be reconciled with some level of *personal* responsibility.