Yes, emotionally manipulative language is effective, but it doesn't have to be. Train yourself to look for it, and then choose to reject it. When you see someone appealing to your emotions instead of your reason, recognize what they're doing and call them out for it.
The majority of the world is clearly against it while those who are for it are dying out and on the way to the genetic dumpster due to negative birth rates.
[citation needed]
(And just so you know... I've already one handy that says you're wrong.)
I love the fact that you have no other purpose in life than to scan Internet forums for occurrences of your initials, and knowing that I can summon you up anytime I want just by inserting them into a post. It's like the master whistling for his dog. HAND.
You're right that I messed up the "decade" part, but 1978 is still a year before 1979 AFAICT. So it looks to me like the regulation came first:
In 1978 the United States banned the use of CFCs such as Freon in aerosol cans, the beginning of a long series of regulatory actions against their use. The critical DuPont manufacturing patent for Freon ("Process for Fluorinating Halohydrocarbons", U.S. Patent #3258500) was set to expire in 1979. In conjunction with other industrial peers DuPont sponsored efforts such as the "Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy" to question anti-CFC science, but in a turnabout in 1986 DuPont, with new patents in hand, publicly condemned CFCs.[14] DuPont representatives appeared before the Montreal Protocol urging that CFCs be banned worldwide and stated that their new HCFCs would meet the worldwide demand for refrigerants.[14]
The OP is also barking up the wrong tree because DuPont didn't have a "replacement" process and patent until nearly a decade after the first one expired. Which is where the "decade" actually came from--I got distracted and did not edit/preview properly, or maybe I'd've caught my error beforehand.
Slashdot Mirror
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pini...
I've never been to Vietnam, but south China (Guangdong, HK) is definitely cleaner than it was when I first visited the region 10 years ago.
Just because there aren't people actually living in a given place doesn't make it "untouched". Not by a long shot.
Yeah, that record-tying high was in Iran, but we don't like Iran, so that's good, and therefore not evidence of climate change.
And yet you were able to get to the shop to buy them in the first place.
Yeah, they've quit trying to invoke Betteridge's Law of Headlines with every story--a vast improvement IMNSHO.
As an EU citizen, I'm here to inform you that you do not speak for me.
Privyetik!
Wow, strong language from an AC. Bet you don't talk like that in real life. Well, no, probably you do, to women and children...
If you knew the first thing about Australia and Aussies, you'd know that Dave was speaking to you as one typically does to children there.
This was information largely hidden by the Obama administration, and Trump made it public.
Anyone who "hid" that information was only hiding it from themselves.
And Canadian bacon!
If you really think this is random, I've got some beachfront property in Kiruna I'm prepared to let you have at a really great price.
But I suspect that the AC's right, and you do really know better.
EU law != US law.
No, you're a complete moron who hasn't a clue how Slashdot moderation works.
[For the avoidance of doubt...]
Good indicator that parent is probably a lawyer.
Yes, emotionally manipulative language is effective, but it doesn't have to be. Train yourself to look for it, and then choose to reject it. When you see someone appealing to your emotions instead of your reason, recognize what they're doing and call them out for it.
They ought to be teaching this to school kids.
The majority of the world is clearly against it while those who are for it are dying out and on the way to the genetic dumpster due to negative birth rates.
[citation needed]
(And just so you know... I've already one handy that says you're wrong.)
You do, but in the former case, it's not the same one.
Reincarnation is not the same thing as resurrection.
I love the fact that you have no other purpose in life than to scan Internet forums for occurrences of your initials, and knowing that I can summon you up anytime I want just by inserting them into a post. It's like the master whistling for his dog. HAND.
You're right that I messed up the "decade" part, but 1978 is still a year before 1979 AFAICT. So it looks to me like the regulation came first:
In 1978 the United States banned the use of CFCs such as Freon in aerosol cans, the beginning of a long series of regulatory actions against their use. The critical DuPont manufacturing patent for Freon ("Process for Fluorinating Halohydrocarbons", U.S. Patent #3258500) was set to expire in 1979. In conjunction with other industrial peers DuPont sponsored efforts such as the "Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy" to question anti-CFC science, but in a turnabout in 1986 DuPont, with new patents in hand, publicly condemned CFCs.[14] DuPont representatives appeared before the Montreal Protocol urging that CFCs be banned worldwide and stated that their new HCFCs would meet the worldwide demand for refrigerants.[14]
The OP is also barking up the wrong tree because DuPont didn't have a "replacement" process and patent until nearly a decade after the first one expired. Which is where the "decade" actually came from--I got distracted and did not edit/preview properly, or maybe I'd've caught my error beforehand.
I think he's probably allowed to talk about himself in his own blog.
You're basically another APK, only with (slightly) better punctuation.
They weren't helped by the fact that existing players in the market would not allow ports of their apps.
1. The fact that there'd be no oversight is *entirely* relevant.
2. "Governance" != "[US] Government".