I was chatting to a bloke at Sybari (pretty much the only bloke that M$ did not fire) and he gave me the impression that they are working on this idea for their Antigen product... who knows if M$ will continue this dev thread?
We use Antigen for Exchange (and yes, I know that Sybari has recently been assimilated into the Borg) and it uses 7 AV engines for every piece of mail however it does so in such a way that it is more efficient in benchmarks than using any one of the vendor email scanners. We have been clean to the point that we now regard viruses as something that happens to other people... of course we use a layered approach which means we also have desktop and server file and memory scanning taking place so if someone brings in an infected laptop it never gets very far and I am sure that any *new improved* method of preventing malicious code execution will be adopted as an additional tool in our AV toolbox however it is never going to be the end of sig based AV as this clears 99% of the crap and lets the cleverer stuff concentrate on the 1% that gets past that net.
Why wear one condom when you can wear 7 and also use a coil, a cap and have her go on the pill?
It tickles me when americans say they can speak english fluently without a foreign accent.
Do I need to remind them that they actually are speaking it in a silly foreign accent and often spelling it incorrectly or committing gross gramatical errors.
If every soldier in the squad had a mic and a gps and a data link back to the central processor it would be far easier to build up a 3d location of the sniper, inbound jets/choppers or whatever.
But then infantry are expendable so money is not spent on them when it can be spent on big scary black jets which will have a real fear of god impact on the enemy.
You're crazy!
Radar uses radio and sonar uses sound... they both bounce stuff off other stuff and work out how far it is away by how long it takes to bounce back though.
Without access to the source code, I can't fix those bugs, I can't make the product better for me, and I don't have access to something I have not just a moral right to, but what should be a legal right to as well. It's akin to buying a house and not being able to change the light bulbs or put an extension on without asking the original architect for his permission.
Man you are a stereotype linux whinger and you give the rest of the Linux community a bad name. You have no moral and especially no legal right to modify their product... it is not akin to a house that you own because you do not own it, you merely have a licence to use it. What you suggest is like putting home made tyres on a rental car and then expecting the car hire company to be pleased about it.
Please mod this dude a troll.
How do they make money of this? Pretty easily... same way any search engine does... they get all the consumers and then charge the companies to access them.
The model is pretty simple and can be compared to adwords... they created something that the public wants to use and give it away free (google search, gmail etc) and then they charge companies modest fees to place ads in front of the consumer.
So how about they get all the consumers using this free wifi access to the googlenet where they have unlimited access to google services and content but then they charge other ISP's and hosting companies to peer to them... saving themselves money and generating revenue.
Please tell me that Raffaello is some acronym or something and not an american bastardisation (notice not spelt bastardization) of the name of the Italian Renaissance painter.
When will the septics stop imposing their inability to spell long and complicated words on the rest of the world? No wonder half the world (or to the americans, the few raggedy headed weirdos who were not lucky enough to be born american and therefore must be devil worshipping baby buggering camel jockeys) want to drive planes into buildings full of americans and even bomb the London tube system in the hope of picking off a few yank tossers who were bright enough to realise that New York has nothing that London doesn't do better (and for centuries longer).
And it is Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
Slashdot Mirror
I was chatting to a bloke at Sybari (pretty much the only bloke that M$ did not fire) and he gave me the impression that they are working on this idea for their Antigen product... who knows if M$ will continue this dev thread?
We use Antigen for Exchange (and yes, I know that Sybari has recently been assimilated into the Borg) and it uses 7 AV engines for every piece of mail however it does so in such a way that it is more efficient in benchmarks than using any one of the vendor email scanners. We have been clean to the point that we now regard viruses as something that happens to other people... of course we use a layered approach which means we also have desktop and server file and memory scanning taking place so if someone brings in an infected laptop it never gets very far and I am sure that any *new improved* method of preventing malicious code execution will be adopted as an additional tool in our AV toolbox however it is never going to be the end of sig based AV as this clears 99% of the crap and lets the cleverer stuff concentrate on the 1% that gets past that net.
Why wear one condom when you can wear 7 and also use a coil, a cap and have her go on the pill?
It tickles me when americans say they can speak english fluently without a foreign accent.
Do I need to remind them that they actually are speaking it in a silly foreign accent and often spelling it incorrectly or committing gross gramatical errors.
BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT ENGLISH!
If every soldier in the squad had a mic and a gps and a data link back to the central processor it would be far easier to build up a 3d location of the sniper, inbound jets/choppers or whatever.
But then infantry are expendable so money is not spent on them when it can be spent on big scary black jets which will have a real fear of god impact on the enemy.
Call me crazy...
but isn't "Sonar in Air" called "radar"?
OK, if you insist...
You're crazy!
Radar uses radio and sonar uses sound... they both bounce stuff off other stuff and work out how far it is away by how long it takes to bounce back though.
I have saved a few virgins in my time...
Blah Blah Blah... I have the moral right... blah blah blah... I cannot return it therefore I own it...
OK, guys, give it up.
And is anybody believing a guy who says he cannot understand a simple EULA but claims he writes device drivers?
Without access to the source code, I can't fix those bugs, I can't make the product better for me, and I don't have access to something I have not just a moral right to, but what should be a legal right to as well. It's akin to buying a house and not being able to change the light bulbs or put an extension on without asking the original architect for his permission.
Man you are a stereotype linux whinger and you give the rest of the Linux community a bad name. You have no moral and especially no legal right to modify their product... it is not akin to a house that you own because you do not own it, you merely have a licence to use it. What you suggest is like putting home made tyres on a rental car and then expecting the car hire company to be pleased about it. Please mod this dude a troll.
How do they make money of this? Pretty easily... same way any search engine does... they get all the consumers and then charge the companies to access them.
The model is pretty simple and can be compared to adwords... they created something that the public wants to use and give it away free (google search, gmail etc) and then they charge companies modest fees to place ads in front of the consumer.
So how about they get all the consumers using this free wifi access to the googlenet where they have unlimited access to google services and content but then they charge other ISP's and hosting companies to peer to them... saving themselves money and generating revenue.
Whoever has the users IS the internet.
the Multi-Purpose Logistics Module Raffaello,
Please tell me that Raffaello is some acronym or something and not an american bastardisation (notice not spelt bastardization) of the name of the Italian Renaissance painter.
When will the septics stop imposing their inability to spell long and complicated words on the rest of the world? No wonder half the world (or to the americans, the few raggedy headed weirdos who were not lucky enough to be born american and therefore must be devil worshipping baby buggering camel jockeys) want to drive planes into buildings full of americans and even bomb the London tube system in the hope of picking off a few yank tossers who were bright enough to realise that New York has nothing that London doesn't do better (and for centuries longer).
And it is Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone