Though I'm not seeing it as directly relevant here, my opinion is a bit of both. As far as priority -- why can't both be satisfied with equal priority?
Before the mysql errors started, there was a flash animation which said somethign very similar to "On August 22nd, 2006... speed record... blah blah... 350.xxx mph"
I am not 100% sure, but I believe that they will need to have cracked the key before checking WAN -- because to crack the key, they need only to 'eavesdrop' on the frequency, and not make any active connection to it.
Allowing only authorized MACs to connect is great, though not perfect because these can be spoofed. Having your wireless router using a key is a good idea, but you'll want to use WPA-PSK for encryption instead of WEP. A quick google search gave me this article which -- in spite of the source -- actually does an OK job of explaining. If you're running Windows, and your card & router support it, the article will be sufficient to get that set up.
WPA-PSK can be tricky to set up on linux, if you're running any linux workstations wirelessly; they only way I've been able to do it with my Broadcomm card is via ndiswrapper and wpa_supplicant. If you're using a wireless linux desktop, some research will be required to find out how to configure this for your distro.
The funny thing is that the audioholics.com writeup includes text copied verbatim out of the Light Blue Optics product brochure (which contains only one product) and web site. Gotta love press release "reporting".
- you don't have to smell the toilet, typically.. unless you live in Europe and still have an older style bowl where your faecal matter just rests in a small puddle before getting flushed ('observation deck' bowls), you'll have one where all that stuff goes into a deep body of water where no odor can escape.
Not quite sure where you got that from; the car has reached 350 mph not 360.
As an aside, all these smaller blogs seem to be able to keep up with the news much better than slashdot these days
That may be true, but not in this case. The summary itself contains a link to the car's site, which has the 350.xx mph record right there on the front page.
its a fiasco and no one seems to care, and that is why zealots mod down informative posts, always instead of debating on merits. sometimes they hypocritically mod the second post down calling it redundant to stifle free and open debate. This post will be no exception probably. You will see.
I'm sorry, did you consider your post to be informative? I merely thought it a rambling rant laden with typos and poor grammar. I mean, come on -- you're harping on a bug that you found five years back, and was fixed almost as long ago. I suppose this is informative -- though not in the way you wish. It informs me that I'm addressing somebody obsessed; somebody who focuses on the past to avoid facing current realities, because those realities are not pleasant.
We understand that you do not wish to come to terms with the present. We understand, and we forgive you, Bill. But it is time to move on, wouldn't you say?
As far as I have heard, CSM is a reliable source in spite of its name. I find it interesting that we'll automatically assume aljazeera.net isn't, because of its name.
Also true; I've classically conditioned my fish to respond to a tap on the tank glass. I was just correcting a bit of misinformation by GP; I'm sometimes anal about these things, for no apparent reason.
Slashdot Mirror
If (Instr(Comments, "linux") Or Instr(Comments, "gnu")) Then
. . . Let Bandwidth = Bandwidth - 1
End If
(I haven't touched a BASIC-like language in a decade, so don't beat me up too badly if it's wrong.)
Though I'm not seeing it as directly relevant here, my opinion is a bit of both. As far as priority -- why can't both be satisfied with equal priority?
At the time, this was justified in the same way, but looking back on it now, we regard it as barbaric. We do?
Before the mysql errors started, there was a flash animation which said somethign very similar to "On August 22nd, 2006... speed record... blah blah... 350.xxx mph"
Therapy to deal with or understand root causes of destructive behavior does not abrogate responsibility for that behavior. "lol".
I am not 100% sure, but I believe that they will need to have cracked the key before checking WAN -- because to crack the key, they need only to 'eavesdrop' on the frequency, and not make any active connection to it.
Allowing only authorized MACs to connect is great, though not perfect because these can be spoofed. Having your wireless router using a key is a good idea, but you'll want to use WPA-PSK for encryption instead of WEP. A quick google search gave me this article which -- in spite of the source -- actually does an OK job of explaining. If you're running Windows, and your card & router support it, the article will be sufficient to get that set up.
WPA-PSK can be tricky to set up on linux, if you're running any linux workstations wirelessly; they only way I've been able to do it with my Broadcomm card is via ndiswrapper and wpa_supplicant. If you're using a wireless linux desktop, some research will be required to find out how to configure this for your distro.
The funny thing is that the audioholics.com writeup includes text copied verbatim out of the Light Blue Optics product brochure (which contains only one product) and web site. Gotta love press release "reporting".
I guess you've never gone backpacking in the wilderness? Toilets are not essential, they're just "nice to have".
If I shit in my backyard, my neighbors would call the cops. And if I shit in on my floor, my wife would kill me.
I'd say that qualifies as "mission critical".
- you don't have to smell the toilet, typically.. unless you live in Europe and still have an older style bowl where your faecal matter just rests in a small puddle before getting flushed ('observation deck' bowls), you'll have one where all that stuff goes into a deep body of water where no odor can escape.
Clearly, you've never eaten beans.
That car has already hit 360+ mph.
Not quite sure where you got that from; the car has reached 350 mph not 360.
As an aside, all these smaller blogs seem to be able to keep up with the news much better than slashdot these days
That may be true, but not in this case. The summary itself contains a link to the car's site, which has the 350.xx mph record right there on the front page.
On top of that these mice are now happy?!
Other than that whole 'plague' thing, wouldn't you be?
That should have been: "Yeah. 'cause my parents were sociopathic killers who stalked me whenever they had the opportunity.
Yeah. 'cause my parents were sociopathic killers who stalked me whenever the opportunity.
What ninny modded this "flamebait"? I'll admit, it doesn't deserve "funny"... b ut it's no more flamebait than parent.
I'll be making appearances all week. Tickets are free, but they'll rape you on the drinks.
We may have said that, but that wasn't the topic under discussion, @ least not by me.
doo...doo...doo... Hey! Where did that cool plastic castle come from?
its a fiasco and no one seems to care, and that is why zealots mod down informative posts, always instead of debating on merits. sometimes they hypocritically mod the second post down calling it redundant to stifle free and open debate. This post will be no exception probably. You will see.
I'm sorry, did you consider your post to be informative? I merely thought it a rambling rant laden with typos and poor grammar. I mean, come on -- you're harping on a bug that you found five years back, and was fixed almost as long ago. I suppose this is informative -- though not in the way you wish. It informs me that I'm addressing somebody obsessed; somebody who focuses on the past to avoid facing current realities, because those realities are not pleasant.
We understand that you do not wish to come to terms with the present. We understand, and we forgive you, Bill. But it is time to move on, wouldn't you say?
Wow. This copy-pasting seems to be a habit for TSP.
As far as I have heard, CSM is a reliable source in spite of its name. I find it interesting that we'll automatically assume aljazeera.net isn't, because of its name.
Come to think of it, it's the very redundancy that makes it funny -- in fact, it gets funnier with every repetition! Get a clue, mods!
It seems that 3 times was funny, four times was 50% funny, and five times is redundant.
Also true; I've classically conditioned my fish to respond to a tap on the tank glass. I was just correcting a bit of misinformation by GP; I'm sometimes anal about these things, for no apparent reason.
Finding the food is scent-based... no memorization required.
doo...doo...doo... Hey! Where did that cool plastic castle come from?