Not that I'm saying I disagree with you, just that the constitution is easily twisted by those who don't give a shit about it to say what they want it to.
No, you just rolled a 1 on your reading comprehension check. It made perfect sense.
Man takes clothes from rack. On way to exit he stops to fill out job app. Heads for exit. Stolen clothes beep at door. Employee lets him leave. Afterwords, employee realizes he was dumb, calls cops, sends them to address listed on job application. Cops get to his house while he's putting stolen clothes in his closet.
This is why you'll sometimes see murder suspects charged with 1st degree, 2nd degree, and manslaughter for one dead body. It gives the jury the option to choose which charge they think actually applies based on the evidence.
If the LA Times goes under it will be the best thing to happen to Los Angeles journalism is decades. Good riddance to that useless party line piece of trash.
Slashdot Mirror
Also, this study: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/hors292.pdf from the Home Office says you're full of shit. Page six, last sentence of the first paragraph, four million CCTV cameras.
A 60-80 meter driveway? Fuck.
Stop your goddamned babble-spamming. Is there a setting to block a user from ever appearing for me again?
I would mod you up just for your sig. Also, 2nd coming.
I am not responsible for the stupidity of others. I'm keeping srjcocks@gmail.com, regardless of what their lawyers say.
Shakespeared never called for killing programmers did he?
I call it an exemplary safety record! If only my doctor made so few mistakes I--I--I--I wouldn't have this terrible stu--st---stutter.
This changes nothing about GP's point.
I was going to make a joke about dead hookers and floorboards here, but then I decided I like not having to explain macabre humor to the FBI.
Or, given that the address mentioned on the job application was stated as the reason he was caught....see what I already said.
It wasn't unclear. A bit convoluted. But perfectly clear.
Because 50% of people are of below average intelligence, and they vote.
I take it you haven't heard of the Everything Clause: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause
Not that I'm saying I disagree with you, just that the constitution is easily twisted by those who don't give a shit about it to say what they want it to.
You can fabricate new meanings of the term 'illegal' all you want, it won't make it true.
Mostly it just makes him look like either a pedophile or a serial killer.
No, you just rolled a 1 on your reading comprehension check. It made perfect sense.
Man takes clothes from rack. On way to exit he stops to fill out job app. Heads for exit. Stolen clothes beep at door. Employee lets him leave. Afterwords, employee realizes he was dumb, calls cops, sends them to address listed on job application. Cops get to his house while he's putting stolen clothes in his closet.
Simple enough?
If you're stealing customers from your girlfriend...can I have her number?
Yes.
This is why you'll sometimes see murder suspects charged with 1st degree, 2nd degree, and manslaughter for one dead body. It gives the jury the option to choose which charge they think actually applies based on the evidence.
Isn't that all politicians do?
If the LA Times goes under it will be the best thing to happen to Los Angeles journalism is decades. Good riddance to that useless party line piece of trash.
Except Newspapers don't create content. AP and Reuters do. This is the collective complaint in this entire thread.
Somebody sure has a lot of sand in their vagina.
Tell that to Hearst.
I doubt he's going to complain.
Well yes, the New York Times is bad.
You don't even have to know that AIG isn't a bank!