I know from connections to several european 'short message service centers' that they won't accept more then 10 or 100 messages a second even for wholesale connections (content providers, chat providers, tv games etc.). The overal capacity can never overflow the network since there is a limiter on the SMSC.
Here in the Netherlands I have seen no HDTV at all. Is a 1280 pixel plasma HDTV? I guess a special tuner is needed for HDTV, the plasmas I have seen do only PAL/NTSC. Same goes for channels, there is digital cable/sat tv here but nothing specified as HDTV.
Would HD DVD be a miss just like SACD and DVDA for audio? I don't think many people will find it appealing enough to invest in this technology for some more pixels on their screens.
For data storage it is still interesting ofcourse.
It might be that Novell has got a point. All the other options (linux, thinclient, windows desktop, webbased) are evaluated by now. And for big corporate networks the license costs could be the key factor. And in the end al Microsoft development, marketing and support had to be paid for and for Linux the major part has been done by a generous but still very clever 'programming society'.
I know from connections to several european 'short message service centers' that they won't accept more then 10 or 100 messages a second even for wholesale connections (content providers, chat providers, tv games etc.). The overal capacity can never overflow the network since there is a limiter on the SMSC.
Here in the Netherlands I have seen no HDTV at all. Is a 1280 pixel plasma HDTV? I guess a special tuner is needed for HDTV, the plasmas I have seen do only PAL/NTSC. Same goes for channels, there is digital cable/sat tv here but nothing specified as HDTV.
Is that a small blue neon tube on the rear side of the PSU?
Would HD DVD be a miss just like SACD and DVDA for audio? I don't think many people will find it appealing enough to invest in this technology for some more pixels on their screens. For data storage it is still interesting ofcourse.
It might be that Novell has got a point. All the other options (linux, thinclient, windows desktop, webbased) are evaluated by now. And for big corporate networks the license costs could be the key factor. And in the end al Microsoft development, marketing and support had to be paid for and for Linux the major part has been done by a generous but still very clever 'programming society'.
No smoking allowed on Titan then? Or is there no oxygen anyway?
What would be the ping time to some server on earth?
Didn't they invent Velcro when landing on the moon?