But if it is that simple, why do some climate science reports look like they have been heavily edited at the White House? With science labeled "not sufficiently reliable." It's a tone of scientific uncertainty the president set in his first months in office after he pulled out of a global treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
I suppose the fundamental uncertainty of scientific results is just not as marketable as religious Truths.
You left out the IMO most important (but less known) law of robotics:
0. A robot may not injure humanity, or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
For your son... riiiiight... ;-)
I misread the second title as Dirge of Cerebeus and thought, finally a game for us aardvark-loving misogynists... oh well.
You left out the IMO most important (but less known) law of robotics: 0. A robot may not injure humanity, or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.