The sole purpose of fat reservoirs is to extend the time of survival in times of malnutrition. On the contrary people who do "exercise" in pre-historic times (meaning to do what everyone had to do) and were not able to retain or even gain weight, are more likely going to die in times of need.
So people who fall into that pre-historic ultimate winner group and who want to loose weight need to eat less, much less.
It's the exact opposite to what they claim. Net neutrality does not slow down investment in broadband networks, in fact massive QoS is the best tool to stall any investment in the infrastructure. If a network can work good enough at nearly 90-100% utilization thanks to QoS even if it means that for example non-HTTP traffic is slowed down to the brink of uselessness, then why invest in faster links? And if every Telco is allowed to do it, then every Telco will do it, leaving the customers no choices.
Net neutrality is good for the competition, good for the market and good for the customers. It's a regulation to keep the market vivid and to weed out those companies that are unfit to compete.
I may be bound to be honest, but then who knows if I really am? No, I don't give away personal information on the web, not even anecdotes about my life. Do you?!?
No, it's the people's habits that didn't change. But really their brains and eyes are capable of so much more.
If your brain is accustomed to high FPS games, then you will know what I mean. That is if you get past the motion sickness.
On the other hand, watching too many movies ruins your perception of reality, really. I wish TV and movies would have a minimum framerate of 60 progressive images. Stuff in the TV studios is produced in 30 Hz or less, btw, and not 60 Hz.
Slashdot Mirror
The sole purpose of fat reservoirs is to extend the time of survival in times of malnutrition. On the contrary people who do "exercise" in pre-historic times (meaning to do what everyone had to do) and were not able to retain or even gain weight, are more likely going to die in times of need. So people who fall into that pre-historic ultimate winner group and who want to loose weight need to eat less, much less.
Yeah, I know that's humour from the age of floppy disks and Zee-Dee-Roms.
Nicely said. That's their attitude, IMHO.
It's the exact opposite to what they claim. Net neutrality does not slow down investment in broadband networks, in fact massive QoS is the best tool to stall any investment in the infrastructure. If a network can work good enough at nearly 90-100% utilization thanks to QoS even if it means that for example non-HTTP traffic is slowed down to the brink of uselessness, then why invest in faster links? And if every Telco is allowed to do it, then every Telco will do it, leaving the customers no choices. Net neutrality is good for the competition, good for the market and good for the customers. It's a regulation to keep the market vivid and to weed out those companies that are unfit to compete.
The party van won't come to you.
And make sure that EastLink won't find out its phase modulation frequency!
I may be bound to be honest, but then who knows if I really am? No, I don't give away personal information on the web, not even anecdotes about my life. Do you?!?
Are you stupid? NEVER!
Am I living in a cardboard box
Programmer's Day celebrates you!
That's my first and only thought, really.
No, it's the people's habits that didn't change. But really their brains and eyes are capable of so much more. If your brain is accustomed to high FPS games, then you will know what I mean. That is if you get past the motion sickness. On the other hand, watching too many movies ruins your perception of reality, really. I wish TV and movies would have a minimum framerate of 60 progressive images. Stuff in the TV studios is produced in 30 Hz or less, btw, and not 60 Hz.
What's next is advertisements in Vista.
The last refuge of solitude (plug off the network cable) and privacy (if you want and particularly if you know how).