As I understand, a Contract (I think Contract contains Agreement) is a statement of understanding, and where there is no understanding, the contract is no good. (To put this point home to a Corporation would be no fun, however.)
With such a summary, the signer (Victim) could argue that the summary is the truer contract, wherever that takes him.
I was looking to make a point about visibility or resolution. I do not think direct suspension of disbelief will continue to work for complete synthetic realities. (Outside direction: People having their consciousness operating on a computer, rather than organic, system)
I think that a new concept would become necessary, something of the line of remembering what button is jump on different games. This concept would be to say what reality one is in, and what principles, ethics, natural laws, etc. exist there.
I call it: What stage of reality is this? How shall we describe varieties of reality at all? Wave terms, like phase and band? By lawsets: Mortality with or without respawn, or gravity(Newtonian, g=some number)?
New models are not bound to the fates of older ones.
I am reminded of the situation in time travel of encountering oneself, a question of what to do comes up.
Slashdot Mirror
Old-people games would require managable controllers, and would call for games that do not mean repetitive strain injuries.
That means gameplay must be engaging, not mechanical; and calling for thought/experience as opposed to button mashing.
We can at least take others' foolish deaths as examples of bad ideas.
As I understand, a Contract (I think Contract contains Agreement) is a statement of understanding, and where there is no understanding, the contract is no good. (To put this point home to a Corporation would be no fun, however.)
With such a summary, the signer (Victim) could argue that the summary is the truer contract, wherever that takes him.
The industry won't ignore us. The market has not. The big few, may. Hee.
I was looking to make a point about visibility or resolution. I do not think direct suspension of disbelief will continue to work for complete synthetic realities. (Outside direction: People having their consciousness operating on a computer, rather than organic, system) I think that a new concept would become necessary, something of the line of remembering what button is jump on different games. This concept would be to say what reality one is in, and what principles, ethics, natural laws, etc. exist there. I call it: What stage of reality is this? How shall we describe varieties of reality at all? Wave terms, like phase and band? By lawsets: Mortality with or without respawn, or gravity(Newtonian, g=some number)? New models are not bound to the fates of older ones. I am reminded of the situation in time travel of encountering oneself, a question of what to do comes up.
16th Century marbles: Marble sculpture made between 1500-1599.