Wait, you're not suggesting that the same muslim terrorists infiltrated a building that housed the Office of Emergency Management, the Department of Defense, the CIA, the Secret Service, and a variety of other interesting tenants (http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm) and managed to place explosive charges in the days or weeks leading up to September 11?
That would be completely implausible, of course. There's no possible way that could happen. Any of the abovementioned agencies, though, would be well-placed to do so, especially with Marvin Bush in charge of security for the whole WTC complex.
The videos you denigrate as 'web' were initially broadcast on network television, and if we're going to go down that route then why bother having a Slashdot story about the same shoddy Pentagon video showing up on the web?
Your own "laser-like focus" on WHO did it completely misses the larger point, that the arab hijackers could not possibly have destroyed building 7.
Actually, if WTC7 were 'pulled,' as it clearly appears on video( http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html), that changes everything. You can't claim that the fires were too dangerous to fight and still be able to go in and place demolitions charges or thermite that day.
Thus it would mean they had been planted in advance. Which means this was not in any sense a surprise attack, and also puts the stories of WTC1 and WTC2 under severe scrutiny.
At freefall speed? So diesel fuel spread through the entire steel structure in an equal distribution, burned evenly, and raised the temperature of every single core column simultaneously, so that the whole structure collapsed in the space of 7 seconds, into its own footprint?
Wow...if diesel can do that by itself, what do we need demolition companies for?
Do Wal-Marts in China have huge Chinese flags and signs proudly proclaiming "Made in China"? And crowds of people outside demanding the company not outsource to Mongolia?
Did you pay taxes? Then the funding came from you.
Maybe you missed the 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS that the Pentagon announced 'misplaced' on September 10, 2001.
Just think about it, that's the money that the 'Defense' Department WON'T admit to having used to kill people. But all of it comes from us.
he's probably got the same definition as something like dictionary.com, namely, that there wasn't any violent bursting as a result of internal pressure. It wasn't burning until the tank had already broken open, which can be a big distinction for people who think that engineers don't know how to keep hydrogen and oxygen apart until the right time. A fireball is just that, a ball of fire--although it expands, sure, it doesn't really create a blast wave, blow anything apart or do much other than heat damage.
It sounds like nitpicking, but mostly it's just explaining the difference for people who've seen too many movies, and think that a pool of gasoline would have the same effect as a bomb.
This isn't proof of anything, I suppose, but...this is kind of curious, isn't it?
"In October, press reports revealed that White House staff had been on a regimen of the powerful antibiotic Cipro since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Judicial Watch wants to know why White House workers, including President Bush, began taking the drug nearly a month before anthrax was detected on Capitol Hill. "
Yeah, and everyone soon forgot about asking where that white powder came from, didn't they? http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j022202.html...Terror just to freak people out is amateur stuff. Terror to get someone else in trouble, now that's effective...
Slashdot Mirror
Say what you will, this site is interesting:
http://quake.exit.com/
Blood Drives, you say?
How about you start treating this subject with the gravity it deserves?
That would be completely implausible, of course. There's no possible way that could happen. Any of the abovementioned agencies, though, would be well-placed to do so, especially with Marvin Bush in charge of security for the whole WTC complex.
The videos you denigrate as 'web' were initially broadcast on network television, and if we're going to go down that route then why bother having a Slashdot story about the same shoddy Pentagon video showing up on the web?
Your own "laser-like focus" on WHO did it completely misses the larger point, that the arab hijackers could not possibly have destroyed building 7.
I don't see any arab names on that list. Were there any arabs on the plane? On any passenger manifest? Did they even get on the plane?
Actually, if WTC7 were 'pulled,' as it clearly appears on video( http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html), that changes everything. You can't claim that the fires were too dangerous to fight and still be able to go in and place demolitions charges or thermite that day. Thus it would mean they had been planted in advance. Which means this was not in any sense a surprise attack, and also puts the stories of WTC1 and WTC2 under severe scrutiny.
At freefall speed? So diesel fuel spread through the entire steel structure in an equal distribution, burned evenly, and raised the temperature of every single core column simultaneously, so that the whole structure collapsed in the space of 7 seconds, into its own footprint? Wow...if diesel can do that by itself, what do we need demolition companies for?
Do Wal-Marts in China have huge Chinese flags and signs proudly proclaiming "Made in China"? And crowds of people outside demanding the company not outsource to Mongolia?
Did you pay taxes? Then the funding came from you.
Maybe you missed the 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS that the Pentagon announced 'misplaced' on September 10, 2001.
Just think about it, that's the money that the 'Defense' Department WON'T admit to having used to kill people. But all of it comes from us.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html So please, stop asking. This robot's not going to help find him unless it can dig.
As if that coyote didn't have it bad enough. "meep meep!" WHAM!!! "Agh....I'm so....thirsty."
he's probably got the same definition as something like dictionary.com, namely, that there wasn't any violent bursting as a result of internal pressure. It wasn't burning until the tank had already broken open, which can be a big distinction for people who think that engineers don't know how to keep hydrogen and oxygen apart until the right time. A fireball is just that, a ball of fire--although it expands, sure, it doesn't really create a blast wave, blow anything apart or do much other than heat damage. It sounds like nitpicking, but mostly it's just explaining the difference for people who've seen too many movies, and think that a pool of gasoline would have the same effect as a bomb.
Precisely. If I wanted up-to-date news, I'd spend my time on Digg. Slashdot is something to do to avoid work.
"Razor and Blade?! They're flakes!" "They're ELITE!" (ducks)
"In October, press reports revealed that White House staff had been on a regimen of the powerful antibiotic Cipro since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Judicial Watch wants to know why White House workers, including President Bush, began taking the drug nearly a month before anthrax was detected on Capitol Hill. "
Yeah, and everyone soon forgot about asking where that white powder came from, didn't they? http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j022202.html ...Terror just to freak people out is amateur stuff. Terror to get someone else in trouble, now that's effective...