Slashdot Mirror


Thirsty People Feel More Pain

Bifurcati writes "Being thirsty makes you more sensitive to pain, according to a recent study. By simultaneously doing brain scans, new areas of the brain were activated when both pain and thirst were present, apparently making the pain more "painful" - perhaps a survival method so that pain is prioritized over thirst. They'd like to do more research, but ethical issues make it tough - even these subjects had to spend three hours being poked and prodded!"

273 comments

  1. Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30yrs by toby · · Score: 2, Informative
    The relationship between dehydration and pain has been studied for nearly 30 years by the late Fereydoon Batmanghelidj M.D., an expert in the body's water chemistry. Many such links are documented on his web site and in his books.

    I am currently reading Your Body's Many Cries for Water and it has been very eye-opening about body chemistry, and covers the subject with medical and scientific rigour. I highly recommend it to people for whom conventional medicine is at best 'managing' and not reversing their health issues. Particularly compelling in that book is Dr Batmanghelidj's thorough scientific explanation on how 'diet' sodas actually substantially contribute to weight gain.

    The immediately curious can access his library of scientific papers (in PDF format).

    --
    you had me at #!
  2. what about pleasure? by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If not drinking water amplifies pain, wouldn't the same be true from a not-so-distant-cousin, pleasure?

    1. Re:what about pleasure? by dzarn · · Score: 5, Funny

      If not drinking water amplifies pain, wouldn't the same be true from a not-so-distant-cousin, pleasure?

      If getting shot causes pain, wouldn't the same be true for its not-so-distant-cousin, pleasure?

    2. Re:what about pleasure? by jd0g85 · · Score: 5, Funny
      If not drinking water amplifies pain, wouldn't the same be true from a not-so-distant-cousin, pleasure?

      I dunno, but where can I sign up for the study?

      --
      There is no belief, however foolish, that will not gather its faithful adherents who will defend it to the death.-Asimov
    3. Re:what about pleasure? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I know you're joking... but that's rather a myth. If two relatives have children then there is an increased risk of abnormality, but it isn't certain at all.

      Interestingly this has been studied in communities that marry within families a lot, and found that after the second generation the risk diminishes (for some reason a geneticist could probably explain only with lots of hand waving).

    4. Re:what about pleasure? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No hand-waving needed: the kids born with the really serious abnormalities die off before they have a chance to reproduce. It only takes a couple of generations of that sort of selective pressure to eliminate the seriously bad alleles, or at least reduce their occurrence to the level found in the general population.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:what about pleasure? by Retric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the first generation you would see more "uncommon" and recessive DNA show up. Chances are if it's not the "common" DNA then it's bad mojo.

      However, in the second generation your dealing with a smaller pool of DNA so if nothing killed of the first generation then the second generation probably got a little lucky and skipped out of most of the "bad" DNA so while you don't have a lot of diversity there are fewer things "hiding in the back of the closet" as it where. Over time inbreeding is bad, but 3 or 4 generations is not going to produce people with flippers...

      Well, most of the time. One of the reasons animal breeders tend to use highly related offspring is so they can focuses on eliminating things they don't like or promoting things they like. Say you take 10 random dog's and pair them up producing 60 new dogs dogs per pair. Now select the 10 dogs with say the longest tail and bread them over time you end up with a small set of DNA that happens to have long tails and a host of other problems. But if you separate them into 5 groups you can focus on promoting long tails in each set and then cross bread at a latter time to remove any problem DNA in your line. (The fresh blood idea. You don't want a bunch of clones you want a bunch of random DNA with some specific change.)

    6. Re:what about pleasure? by shawb · · Score: 1

      Well, alcohol does dehydrate you, right?

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    7. Re:what about pleasure? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If getting shot causes pain, wouldn't the same be true for its not-so-distant-cousin, pleasure?

      Well, some people get off on hot wax and whips, so yeah.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:what about pleasure? by TWooster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know you're being witty, but, to modify the saying: causation != amplification, and thus your argument (however intended to be humourous) is falacious.

      I didn't RTFA, but from the summary, I'd assume that the effects measured were mainly on the psychological side, rather than the physiological side. That is to say, I'm not sure whether or not the nerve endings were hyper-sensitive due to dehydration, or a change in the chemicals in the brain (which I'm terming here as psychological) affected the pain amplification.

      If it's physiological, it's a relatively easy leap to make to assume that pleasure would be amplified as well. If it's psychological, it's slightly tougher, but the case could still be made.

      It makes sense in the grand scheme of things, what with the experiences people have when fasting.

    9. Re:what about pleasure? by Grym · · Score: 1

      It only takes a couple of generations of that sort of selective pressure to eliminate the seriously bad alleles, or at least reduce their occurrence to the level found in the general population.

      No... That's not true at all.

      In fact, by mere selection alone, one can NEVER remove a recessive abnormality (what the GP was discussing) from a population, because selection depends upon the PHENOTYPE of an indivdual but the persistance of a trait depends only on the GENOTYPE. The genetic abnormalities from inbreeding are just as prevelant (if not more) in the Nth generation of inbreds as the first.

      The only time where this wouldn't be the case for a particular trait might be if the recessive allele, by genetic drift, became fixed because of the small effective population size. But in such a case, the population would still suffer (i.e. have decreased fitness) from lack of genetic diversity.

      -Grym

    10. Re:what about pleasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a way- you can make your slave's enjoyment of you fucking her with a machine more pleasureable by keeping her hydrated.

  3. This might be true. by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to work with a fellow named Mike. He suffered from severe carpal tunnel syndrome, perhaps caused by the decades of typing he had done while programming. He would always drink massive amounts of water and juice while working, saying that it helped his wrists. We'd make fun of him because he had to piss every half hour, but perhaps he was on to something.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:This might be true. by tool462 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm betting that taking a couple minute break every 30 minutes wasn't hurting anything either ;)

    2. Re:This might be true. by gkhan1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, maybe the "bathroom breaks" caused the carpal tunnel syndrome in the first place! Anyone check his breifcase for "grown-up" magazines?

    3. Re:This might be true. by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting
      He would always drink massive amounts of water and juice while working, saying that it helped his wrists. We'd make fun of him because he had to piss every half hour, but perhaps he was on to something.


      It sounds like he may have diabetes II. Especially if he's drinking a lot of juice (this is sugar water for blood sugar purposes).

      If you're still see him from time to time, make sure he sees a doctor about that - I drink water all day long and have to visit the bathroom maybe every 4 hours.

      It could also be an enlarged prostrate..... anyway, the bladder is capable of stretching to several liters....

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urinary_bladder
    4. Re:This might be true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My survival training instructor in the Army used to tell us about this, in the late 70's mind you, so even the Army knew about this, decades ago, before they required even a GED to get in.

    5. Re:This might be true. by shawb · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a couple possibilities for why this helped: 1)Taking the hand off the mouse and keyboard to grab the glass to drink rests your wrists and allows for a different movement: one of the biggest suggestions for CT sufferers is to take short breaks and exercise your wrists a little. Also the resultant trips to the bathroom give another break from typing (hopefully not exercising his wrists there, though.)

      2)Could have a medical condition: diabetes and some liver and kidney disorders can cause polydipsia and associated polyuria: a desire to drink a LOT of water, and then of course the resultant urination. Someone who does not drink this large amount of water could potentially be not flushing out certain toxins or other chemicals.

      3)Placebo(tm): the drug against which all others are tested.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    6. Re:This might be true. by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1
      the bladder is capable of stretching to several liters....
      I'm not sure about that, It's my understanding that it's uncomfortably full at about 1 liter. Though not all the water you drink will end up there, you'll lose it through your lungs when breathing and sweating as well.
      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    7. Re:This might be true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to drink a gallon of water a day. Literally carry around a gallon jug of water and drink the whole thing before going home. After about a week, you go to the bathroom about as frequently as before. Certainly you can't stretch to several liters instantly, but you can work up to it.

    8. Re:This might be true. by crache · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I once too used to carry around a gallon jug and drink out of it all day. You were probably doing manual labor though and a much higher percent is released through sweat. Now that I sit in front of the computer at home I usually drink 2 glasses of water at a time and have to go to the bathroom a lot of times in a day. I'm not sure how much I'm drinking total, but I'm going to the bathroom a lot more than once every 4 hours, and I know for sure it's not because my bladder isn't up to it. Sometimes I will go without leaving the room, fill a 1 liter moxie bottle, dump it out the window and then relieve myself some more. (There's snow out there right now so don't worry about it).

    9. Re:This might be true. by WotanKhan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Staying properly hydrated also helps address the root cause of the injury, by promoting flexibility of the connective tissue, and allowing the fascia to function properly.

    10. Re:This might be true. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      oh come on. i drink several bottles of mineral water at work and usually go every half an hour to the toilet. i keep it like that at home, only that i use tap water.

      it is just much more comfortable to have an empty bladder.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    11. Re:This might be true. by pureevilmatt · · Score: 1

      Who needs a toilet when you've got a window and a good throwing arm!

    12. Re:This might be true. by richlv · · Score: 1

      ugh. every 4 hours ?
      only explanation is - you did not mention the amount of fluid you consumed :)

      i am usually "resistant" in this way, but in cases when i drink 4 and more liters of tea/juice/whatever a day (and this usually concentrates in ~6 hours), i have to visit toilet at least every hour or two. if i drink couple of liters in half an hour, i have to do that more often :)

      now, this is somewhat different with beer which i need more to get "bathroom visitng need", but that might be connected to dehydration caused by alcohol and usually beer drinking accompanied by more physical activity, like, um, walking for a refill :)

      --
      Rich
  4. Ethics by pclminion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would it be unethical if the test subjects were made fully aware of what was to be done to them, and were willing to undergo the experiment? Unless somebody was deceived or coerced I don't see how ethics would even come into it.

    1. Re:Ethics by imoou · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe if users are made aware of the censorship, censoring search results becomes okay.

    2. Re:Ethics by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Maybe if users are made aware of the censorship, censoring search results becomes okay.

      How the hell is that even remotely analogous?

    3. Re:Ethics by fafalone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You wouldn't even make it to getting people to consent to something like that because no institutional review board would ever approve it. It's considered unethical regardless of their consent, for so many reasons anyone with any experience in a field that researched on humans should be aware of. And furthermore it's alot easier to get permission to conduct a study with deception, as long as its not deception that's going to really harm them.

    4. Re:Ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So hold the experiment in a tattoo parler. Problem solved... as long as everyone get the same tatoo.
      .mm.mm.
      M..v..M
      .m...M
      ..m.m
      ...v
    5. Re:Ethics by weisen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I didn't see the specific "ethically difficult" tasks that they were proposing, but pain research that involves *causing* physical pain *is* done and IRB approved. One way to cause moderate pain without physical damage is to inject capsaicin (the heat inducing oil in chili peppers) under the skin. In the article's description of the ethical difficulties, the problems cited (radiopharmaceuticals, plastic facial mask, IV lines) are somewhat specific to PET scanning and wouldn't be experienced in an fMRI setting.

      If you're bored, go to http://www.pubmed.gov/ and search for "coghill" and "pain" and you'll see one researcher's body of work.

      Some of this was funded by the US National Institute for Dental Research (part of NIH), which I always found amusing.

    6. Re:Ethics by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1
      Why would it be unethical if the test subjects were made fully aware of what was to be done to them, and were willing to undergo the experiment?
      1. You see someone feeling pain and even probably asking for help
      2. You know how to help him/her.
      3. You don't do it because you have some experiment to work on. Probably you even cause more pain

      I see the last one as an ethical problem, even if those people agreed to undergo experiment.
      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    7. Re:Ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's considered unethical regardless of their consent...

      And why should this be so?

      I personally have no problem with experiencing pain, if my consent is given, to advance human knowledge. And I would certainly like to benefit from the broader range of information that such studies could reveal, if they were not blocked by review boards employing a distorted (from my POV) sense of ethics.

      As long as consent is given, I don't believe that petty ethical concerns should be held above the cause of science.

    8. Re:Ethics by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I see the last one as an ethical problem, even if those people agreed to undergo experiment.

      So if a subject asks to be removed from the experiment, you let them out. Next stupid argument?

    9. Re:Ethics by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, do what Nazi Germany did- just propose this research to Gitmo Bay torturers, and let THEM do the research for you.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:Ethics by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      In fact, that is probably what the experiment should be like. As soon as somebody says stop, then that is the amount of pain that that person can take. The give the person a chance (de)hydrate, and then repeat. In fact, the person could be the 1 to control it via a dial or an electronic device.

      I honestly find it surprising that anybody would prevent this type of an experiment. It seems unethical to not do it. Maybe the Myth Busters should do it.

  5. It's true... by megla · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...all true!
    Whenever I've been without a beer for a while, the pain just kicks in man. Oh the terrible pain!

    1. Re:It's true... by fafalone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope this was modded funny because alcohol dehydrates you, but I suspect it was just because of the beer reference.

    2. Re:It's true... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Next time I go to a hospital, I'm chugging a litre of water first.

      It might not help with the pain very much, but I'll be able to provide for the urine testing at least.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:It's true... by Trepalium · · Score: 2, Funny

      Depends. He could be drinking American beer. It's mostly water, after all.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    4. Re:It's true... by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Even a good, strong Belgian tends to top out at 12-15%. All beer is mostly water, silly.

    5. Re:It's true... by MustardMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Even a good, strong Belgian tends to top out at 12-15%. All beer is mostly water, silly.

      15% alchohol, maybe, but there's a lot of other stuff in there too. I've had belgians that feel like there's a good half inch of grit on the bottom from the bottle fermentation. And some of them pour more like cough syrup than beer, so surely there can't be THAT much water in there.

    6. Re:It's true... by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the effect of beer armour.
      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bee r+Armour

    7. Re:It's true... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      All beer is mostly water, silly.

      So is vodka, but it still dehydrates you.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:It's true... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Ahem. IV plus catheter.

  6. Obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People who are suffering from discomfort find that AND pain even more painful than just pain by itself. Who would have thought?

  7. Foreplay by imoou · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why foreplay is so important so that one can sustain prolonged poking.

    Dry == Painful.

    I'll probably be modded off topic since no one here would understand what I'm saying.

    1. Re:Foreplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sick sick bastard.
      I like it.

    2. Re:Foreplay by MustardMan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      How many slashdotters can honestly sustain prolonged poking?

      I think most would be finished right about the time the first article of clothing hit the floor.

    3. Re:Foreplay by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think everyone here understands what you're saying ... they just can't relate to it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Foreplay by panaceaa · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll probably be modded off topic since no one here would understand what I'm saying.

      Hey man, we're a lot more oldschool than you think. When my family got our first 286 computer I started to program BASIC and learned all about peeking and poking. A couple times I accidentally poked inside an infinite loop, and the 286 held up quite well -- even over prolonged periods of time.

      I'm not sure what foreplay has to do with it, but I did enjoy a good game of Snarf!

  8. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by amazon10x · · Score: 2, Funny

    For velcro-chest-hair-pockets

  9. Nothing new here by pHatidic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a former lightweight rower I can vouch for this. Rowing a balls out 2K is hard. Doing it the day after sweating off 10 pounds is just sadistic.

    1. Re:Nothing new here by shawb · · Score: 1

      I think that's more related to losing your body's natural cooling system: sweat.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:Nothing new here by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      As an 8-year cox and coach, I'm massively surprised that you think that could have an effect. Even lightweights should keep themselves hydrated for training; if you didn't rehydrate after a training session, it's your own damn fault that you've got a large lactic acid buildup (the pain of an erg) because you don't have anything to flush it out with... even just before a major race you still want to keep yourself hydrated, because of the performance increase it gives.

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
  10. Okay... and? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Previous studies in rats have shown that mild thirst makes the animals feel more pain but severe dehydration actually dulls pain, he says.
    So basically, what they're saying is that dehydration & pain follow a curve of some type and that curve peaks relatively early on.

    Their conclusion: Be hydrated.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  11. Pain coming from fear? by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am one of the least sensitive-to-pain people you'll ever meet. I used to always feel pain, because I was afraid of feeling pain. But I learned years ago how to ignore that fear -- avoid fearing entirely. Since then, my tolerance for pain is huge. I've broken bones, lost teeth (punch to the face in a bar) and had my share of other situations (cat bites, skateboard accidents, car accident, etc) and my tolerance to pain is impressive. I've even done major dental work without pain killers and passed kidney stones the same way.

    I don't drink a lot of fluids. I should (considering the kidney stones), but I don't. I love water, just don't drink a lot of it. I love tea, too, but forget to drink it.

    I think feeling pain is often a mind over matter kind of thing. I had a carpenter friend who cut two of his fingers off and didn't feel pain until he noticed it. I had a friend who broke a foot snowboarding and didn't feel pain until he looked at it.

    Have there been studies on pain and mind-over-matter situations?

    1. Re:Pain coming from fear? by imoou · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if that's a good thing that one is too pain-tolerant.

      I would rather feel pain and cry like a little girl than subjecting to potential injuries without fear.

    2. Re:Pain coming from fear? by JoeShmoe950 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I must agree. I've always had a major fear of needles, and thus even a simple shot has always hurt for me, yet once I cut my finger open (somewhat deeply) after I thought it would be clever to hit a sheet of plexiglass with a sledgehammer (which exploded and cut me open), and this barely hurt at all, simply because it was unexpected, however stupidily.

    3. Re:Pain coming from fear? by klahnako · · Score: 1

      Sociopath?

      Why are you breaking teeth?

    4. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      I had a carpenter friend who cut two of his fingers off and didn't feel pain until he noticed it. I had a friend who broke a foot snowboarding and didn't feel pain until he looked at it.

      This is a very common thing. It is usual for someone to not feel pain until they actually see an injury. It is more common when the injury is unexpected, because the brain doesn't know that the feeling it is recieving is supposed to hurt.

    5. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah, but unexpected or not, paper cuts often hurt worse than much more serious injuries. I cut one of my fingers open pretty good, it probably should have been stitched, and it barely hurt at all--at first.

      Thin cuts from paper, plastic or metal, though... Oh boy, you sure know you got into something good when one of those gets yah.

    6. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Cobralisk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know about studies, but I think adrenaline is a great pain-killer. I broke my ankle playing basketball. My foot kept falling off the gas pedal on the drive home. I didn't feel any pain until I sat on the couch at home and put ice on it. It quickly became excruciating. I can think of several other similar abeit less severe experiences in my life as well.

      It could be that in moments of extreme pain the brain quickly releases endorphins to dull the pain so you can focus on the task at hand of, say, running away from a mountain lion while bleeding from the neck. But when the danger is gone the brain really lets you have it so you remember not to go stealing dinner from the nice kitty again. We do feel pain for a reason, but too much or too little or at inapproriate times is almost always bad in the long run (it sucks losing teeth, fingers, or eyes).

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    7. Re:Pain coming from fear? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Not a sociopath, I was punched because I talked to a girl. The boyfriend was jealous and cold-cocked me. End of story :)

    8. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too used to have a fear, except mine was of heights. I was so afraid that I couldn't even stand up on a chair. Then I realized it was all a mind over matter thing so I decided to jump off of the roof of an apartment building. I broke every bone in my body, but it's okay because I've conquered my fear of pain. That is why I decide to take up kickboxing and weighing 100 pounds go into the heavyweight division - mind over matter.

      Seriously, pain, of all the sensations, is the most effective at telling your brain "Hey, this really isn't good for our health." Ignoring it in some situations is fine (for the computer-minded among us, it's like ignore a compiler warning). But you've got to be a complete idiot to be completely ignoring pain - if you're breaking bones/teeth/whatnot, pain's a good way of telling you to stop being an idiot. However, your story may make a hilarious footnote for the Darwin awards someday - here's hoping.

    9. Re:Pain coming from fear? by fafalone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering I've met people with various levels of HSAN, I'm sure your sensitivity to pain is actually quite high. Sensitivity and tolerance for pain are also different concepts. Unless you have late developing CIPA or a similar HSAN disease, I suspect your sensitivity is normal. However, extensive research has been conducted and shown that perception of pain can be controlled by the higher parts of the brain, and thus can be selectively or conditioned to be ignored to various degrees of success. Now this is also different from pain from massive trauma, which is probably an evolutionary mechanism to let you get out of situations that are severely harming you before you have to deal with the pain.
      It's not mind over matter, it's just how the mind works. Guess what controls parts of higher order affective pain response? Some abstract construct people call the "mind"? No, hows about parts of the insular cortex.

    10. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 1

      I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

    11. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said...
      The logic behind the "Caveman Theory" is nearly always correct in human biology.
      Extreme pain does trigger an immediate release of endorphins and adrenaline, most likely due to the idea you illustrated above.
      I'v personally experienced this effect as well... I once nearly sliced a finger off, but luckily only to the bone on one side, and I do not recall feeling any pain until later. Actually, the "pain" was more an effect resulting from actually running to a sink and examining the wound, but this had more of an anxiety or panic effect rather than pain. It also could have been because the major nerve had been severed as well.

      Also, "pain" has a loose definition, as there can also be mental or emotional pain. E.g. Having your foot smashed by a hammer is much less "painful" than feeling genuianely suicidal, having someone close to you die, etc.

      I don't think that one can obsure the sensation of pain somehow by meditation, or some other mental device, one can only alter the focus.

      So the adage proves true, if you've got a headache, smack your hand with a hammer and the headache will disappear. Except now your hand hurts like hell, so you've altered the FOCUS of area of your brain that perceives pain to your hand, not the mild headache.

      Long-term, one can "learn" techniques to distract from mild, continuous pain even though the stimulus still exists.

      --Prof. Highbrow

    12. Re:Pain coming from fear? by FireballX301 · · Score: 1

      There are people that literally cannot feel pain - therefore they would be able to, for example, sit with their knee twisted in what would be an excruciating position with no awareness that they're actually hurting themselves.

      Few of these people make it to adulthood because of a death that could have been prevented if they could feel the pain.

      Be thankful you can feel pain. It means something's wrong, and it means that whatever the hell you were doing or just did, you need to change it, *now*. That's why you stop feeling pain after, for example, your arm is blown off from a shrapnel blast - after a point, feeling pain is useless.

    13. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough with the star wars references!

    14. Re:Pain coming from fear? by bronney · · Score: 1

      Which brings me to think, according to this theory, the blind people will be so confused. No?

    15. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I think feeling pain is often a mind over matter kind of thing.

      It is, but only to a point. I broke my neck about 20 years ago - I don't care who you are, THAT SHIT HURTS!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    16. Re:Pain coming from fear? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      But I learned years ago how to ignore that fear -- avoid fearing entirely.

      Hal?

      Hal Jordan, is that you?

    17. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Hoo00 · · Score: 1

      Pain depends on the afferent nerves. If you cut off the pathway of your nerves to the brain, then you cannot feel it. Our brains can also be trained to ignore these signals over time, or to recreate the memory of pain. Since they are just neuron signals, some people can even enjoy pain.

    18. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dune.

    19. Re:Pain coming from fear? by z4r4thu5tr4 · · Score: 1

      Agree with the lay intuition of delayed pain reaction, but your conclusion about what the brains "knows" is absolutely incorrect. Pain afferents are actually distinct from sensory nerves, so there is no issue with someone confusing pain with other sensation. Why some people don't exhibit pain immediately after trauma is bc the brain has descending inputs into pain afferents that can shut pain off before it reaches the brain.

    20. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dune.

      All too easy.
      we're reelin' em in!

    21. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Jongpil+Yun · · Score: 1
      I've even done major dental work without pain killers and passed kidney stones the same way.
      Frey, is that you!?
    22. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was hilarious. Seriously, you made me snort.

    23. Re:Pain coming from fear? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      They are called lepers.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    24. Re:Pain coming from fear? by laszlo462 · · Score: 1

      Dune!!! My favorite quote.

    25. Re:Pain coming from fear? by srussia · · Score: 0

      I had a friend who broke a foot snowboarding and didn't feel pain until he looked at it.

      That would be the "Wile E. Coyote Effect"

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    26. Re:Pain coming from fear? by garcia · · Score: 1

      I am deathly afraid of needles and find that they hurt terribly. Especially that I apparently have narrow veins (they look huge to me) that or the nurses that I've been lucky enough to draw my blood suck...

      Anyway, I have been cut by flying glass in a bar fight (I was an innocent and very drunk bystander), stepped on the eye-end of a needle (with thread) that was lodged in my foot, etc. All of those were painless.

      But the little pin prick from the needle at the doctor's is enough to send me screaming.

  12. Where's the problem here? by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    They'd like to do more research, but ethical issues make it tough - even these subjects had to spend three hours being poked and prodded!

    I don't know... sounds like something quite a few people would pay good money for.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Where's the problem here? by plate+of+felt · · Score: 1

      exactly.. as a consistantly dehydrated masochist.. i'm really wondering how there would be ethical issues..

  13. the perfect test patient... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Find a self-inflicting sadist, and voila!

    1. RE: the perfect test patient... by alexmat · · Score: 1

      You mean "find a masochist"? What you just did to my brain was sadistic ;P

    2. Re:the perfect test patient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I believe they call those masochists.

    3. Re:the perfect test patient... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Don't we have lots of "terrorists" in cuba, afghanistan, egypt, lebanon, syria, kuwait, iraq, western europoe etc.

      We are already torturing these people why not conduct experiments at the same time. Strike that we are already experimenting by injecting them with new and classified drugs why not use that for scientific studies too?

      --
      evil is as evil does
  14. Flawed Logic by NoData · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fromt the article:

    Survival instinct

    He says pain is accentuated because it is more important to survival than mild thirst.

    "The sensation with the most immediate implications for survival is pushed to the forefront of attention," he said.

    Dr Farrell says the findings suggest it could be wise for people who are about to go through a painful experience should drink more water beforehand.

    He says evidence from different types of studies also support this relationship between drinking water and pain.

    But could people deliberately use dehydration to maximise pain, say via torture?

    "We suspect if they got dehydrated enough that the overwhelming sense of thirst would probably make pain less rather than more," he said.

    Previous studies in rats have shown that mild thirst makes the animals feel more pain but severe dehydration actually dulls pain, he says.

    He says this too makes sense from the point of view of survival.

    "If you were very dehydrated it would pay to suppress pain because it might get in the way of your search for water," he said.


    Wouldn't that imply that the more hydrated you are, the more salient the pain should be, because then thirst is particularly irrelevant to your current needs? They say that "mild thirst" is not as pressing a survival need as experienced pain--well then, wouldn't NO thirst be even less pressing than the pain? I don't get it. They predict the situation switches for severe dehydration which makes sense (the thirst is more salient than the pain) but they don't explain why the pain should be more salient for mild thirst as compared to slaked thirst.

    I would guess the logic in the actual PNAS paper is better. Perhaps it's the reporting here that's got something screwy.

    1. Re:Flawed Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's specifically because you are thirsty that pain needs to be accentuated. Your body decides that the pain is in need of more immediate attention, so it tries to cause you more discomfort than your thirst. In a dungeon-hack, i suppose it would go like this:

      ---

      You exit the door to find yourself in a desert. You are starting to get thirsty, but suddenly a small insect bites you in the leg. It is quite painful.

      1) Find water
      2) Inspect wound
      3) Open box

      vs

      You exit the door to find yourself in a desert. You are starting to get thirsty but OH MY GOD A HUGE FRIGGIN SPIDER JUST BIT YOU IN THE ASS! ITS **PAINFUL**. What do you do?

      1) Find water
      2) Inspect wound
      3) Open box

    2. Re:Flawed Logic by m50d · · Score: 1

      If you're not thirsty at all, you're not going to waste time looking for a drink. The pain is made stronger so it gets noticed over the thirst.

      --
      I am trolling
  15. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by AlienSlav · · Score: 0

    MY mom has chest hair. Oh yea and to keep on topic she drinks water too:P
    AlienSlave

  16. Possibly ignoring other routes? by Hellasboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I mean is this:
    There was an experiment where they stuck a cat and mouse in a cage. The cat ignored the mouse. Absolutely showed no interest in it. But pain was then inflicted on the cat and the cat attacked the mouse until it was dead.

    Did the researchers test to see if it's not only pain that the subject feels? Maybe the subject will feel more agitated, stressed, angered, emotional, or a combination?

    --

    "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    1. Re:Possibly ignoring other routes? by gkhan1 · · Score: 1
      While you do have a point, you get the experiment backwards. They don't inflict pain, and see what happens, they dehydrate the subject and sees what happens (more pain, as it turns out). Therefore your cat and mouse thing doesn't apply

      On a related note, I don't need an experiment to tell me that I get agitated, stressed, angered, emotional or a combination when I feel pain! Yes I do! Really! Not something that needs to be put to an experiment, in my humble opinion.

    2. Re:Possibly ignoring other routes? by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .the cat attacked the mouse until it was dead.

      That must have been one badass mouse. Ya sure it wasn't a baby kangaroo.

      KFG

    3. Re:Possibly ignoring other routes? by thelamecamel · · Score: 1

      Was the cat was asleep in the cage until it was woken up by the pain?

    4. Re:Possibly ignoring other routes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have two cats, you can try this experiment at home. Put the cats in a small room and then start messing with one of them. You know, push 'em over, run your hands over them roughly, etc. When you stop, the cat will probably look all pissed and then lash out at the other cat if it's nearby. Little kids do the same thing; they take their frustrations out on others.

  17. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. An informative first post that pretty much sums the entire thread up. Maybe you should write the articles.

  18. Cue Super Troopers by pkhuong · · Score: 1

    Erh, yeah... It seems the comment was in jest, but you'd be surprised.

    --
    Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
  19. that's funny.... by Nihilanth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    we just learned this today in anatomy and physiology. It didn't seem like ground-breaking science, just common sense. If you're thirsty, neurons in the pre-optic nucleus are shrinking (crenating) because your plasma fluid compartment is drying up. This creates a hypertonic (or hyperosmotic) environment that literally sucks the water out of your cells. Since your plasma is more concentrated (or has a higher osmolarity), the resting membrane potential goes up because the crenation of your nervous cells causes chemically-operated protein channels to open when they otherwise wouldn't be. This happens all over your body, not just in the pre-optic nucleus (also called the supra-optic nucleus). The crenation at that location (right near where the optic nerves cross eachother) causes those particular cells to pump more Anti-Diuretic Hormone through the pituitary gland, causing your urine volume to decrease (by causing the nephron tubules in your kidneys to reabsorb more water instead of making urine with it), but the same thing happens to cells all over your body when your plasma becomes too concentrated (too dry). In lab today, I had to drink 80ml of water with 7g of NaCl in it, and my feet would fall asleep whenever I stood on them for more than a few minutes. Oh, and I was thirsty and sensitive to pain. Hooray for science!

    1. Re:that's funny.... by barefootgenius · · Score: 2
      Couldn't it be because as your body lacks in fluids it raises the sodium and potassium levels in your nervous system, thus raising their efficiency in transmitting?


      (These are the sort of questions you get from people who went out with nursing students, lol)


      Oh...having looked at your comment again I find thats almost exactly what you said...oops.

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
    2. Re:that's funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right! I can't believe I've been so blind to this "common sense." So many wasted nights...

    3. Re:that's funny.... by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      yeah, its not so much that your body raises the amount of sodium and potassium, but rather as you lose water the concentration of sodium and potassium increases because the solution becomes less dilute. Since the nerve impulses that generate pretty much everything we feel are caused by action potentials that involve potential chemical energy across the membrane of the nerve cells, playing with the concentration of Na or K will make action potentials either easier or harder to "get off" if you will. hehe.

  20. Riiiiiight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "He is arguing for a new scientific approach that turns clinical medicine on its head."

    Daily Mail, London, UK


    That sounds credible.

  21. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by mark_hill97 · · Score: 1

    hair was given (by nature or $DEITY, either way) for warmth, to survive harsh winters.

  22. What are all these ethics about? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Could someone please explain to me why there are always ethical restrictions in potentially important human experimentation if the subjects are well informed and willing? In my psychology course I became aware that there are many psychological experiments done it years past that simply cannot be carried out these days because of such ethical restrictions.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:What are all these ethics about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The basis of medical ethics is to be able to demonstrate the absence of coercion, and not having to rely on the benefit of the doubt. CYA on a grand scale.

      It's a reaction to history. A great deal of what we've learned about the human body came from abuse of slaves, the poor, prisoners, conscripts, the mentally ill, etc. Have a new brain surgery technique? Try it out first on a worthless peon. The real watershed was the world's reaction to experiments done by a certain Dr. Mengele in Germany, and gruesome shit done in the US and Soviet Union during the Cold War.

      Nowadays you can't do medical research without lots of funding and cooperation from institutions -- institutions that would rather not be associated with, say, testing risky AIDS medication on orphans living in state care.

      Does that retard progress? Absolutely. But the alternative is depravity.

    2. Re:What are all these ethics about? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      But what about the willing and informed? You made reference to the unwilling only.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:What are all these ethics about? by Kelbear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, those are some pretty extreme examples that may not explain the problem well enough. In the above, I'm sure the jews weren't well informed and willing subjects. I doubt the orphans would be willing to contract AIDS, not if they understood what it was.

      I would use a different example. Say the test involves some sort of danger or discomfort. What sort of people would /rationally/ undertake such experiences? You'd only get people who enjoy danger and discomfort. Such people would need "help", not more danger and discomfort. These folk ought to be convinced to change this behavior since it brings about hazard to their well-being. It broaches the very controversial debate regarding suicide(Most try to convince others not to commit suicide, while some feel that under certain circumstances and a right to the self makes suicide legitimate). It's very rocky moral ground.

      Take a homeless guy. The videos of the homeless people engaging in dangerous stunts and beating each other bloody for a small amount of food have circulated on the internet for awhile. A homeless guy would love to join up for a pain test for a slice of pizza. He could be well-informed and willing. The morality of offering a test that would inflict pain on the vagrant is very questionable. Such desperate folk would probably be offered many opportunities for such dangerous experiments if such prohibition was not levied. They'd probably be the majority of the subjects of these tests.

      Another example is prostitution. Let's take a developing country where there is little money to be had. Many teenaged boys and girls offer themselves up for prostitution to avoid starvation. If offered, of course they'd sign up for the tests, well-informed and willing. But many would argue that such tests on them would be exploitation, much like if they were offered prostitution instead of sex.

      There's no question that we'd receive great deal of useful research if we allowed such testing. The potential benefit for the world at large may even outweigh the exploitation(this is a loaded word, but I don't want it to be interpreted as such, too lazy to use a thesaurus). It's just that the moral stigma is too great of a short-term obstacle to overcome.

      But there are other places in the world where such questions of morality can be ignored. Maybe the research can be accomplished over there. Personally I'd find it deplorable, but there is definitely plenty of room for argument.

    4. Re:What are all these ethics about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're in a psych. class and they didn't go over this stuff with you? For shame! Smack your teacher upside the head for me. If he/she doesn't like it tell them they didn't explain well enough why such a thing would be unethical, so you figured it was ok...

      Particular to the field of psychology, if you haven't already, you should check out the Stanford Prison Experiement and Stanley Millgram's obedience/authority experiments at Yale. Those two experiments practically created the ethical reviews in modern psychology (and other fields with human patients). They both took normal subjects and put them in abnormal situations which had far reaching consequences on their psyches. There is also the older experiment of John Watson with "Little Albert", yet another scar on the face of the discipline. We learned many things from each of those experiments, but the great effect they had on the subjects makes it unethical to carry out such experiments in the future. Researchers are trying to simulate real world situations in the lab so they can have better control over variables. But the experiments can't permanently harm the people who are in them... these rules are a little different for pharmacology and psychopharmacology experiments, but then those are billion dollar industries...

    5. Re:What are all these ethics about? by eloki · · Score: 1

      Say the test involves some sort of danger or discomfort. What sort of people would /rationally/ undertake such experiences?

      Replace "the test" with "war". Yet people rationally do military service. In these experiments, most people would feel that there is a greater good being achieved which they are willing to sacrifice for. Not saying that everyone would or should be willing to do it, but I don't think it's irrational to be willing to.

      Of course, people can easily be coerced or misled (making rational decisions due to threats or incorrect beliefs), so that can be important. I only thought I'd comment on the rationality part.

    6. Re:What are all these ethics about? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Take a homeless guy. The videos of the homeless people engaging in dangerous stunts and beating each other bloody for a small amount of food have circulated on the internet for awhile. A homeless guy would love to join up for a pain test for a slice of pizza. He could be well-informed and willing. The morality of offering a test that would inflict pain on the vagrant is very questionable. Such desperate folk would probably be offered many opportunities for such dangerous experiments if such prohibition was not levied. They'd probably be the majority of the subjects of these tests.

      Another example is prostitution. Let's take a developing country where there is little money to be had. Many teenaged boys and girls offer themselves up for prostitution to avoid starvation. If offered, of course they'd sign up for the tests, well-informed and willing. But many would argue that such tests on them would be exploitation, much like if they were offered prostitution instead of sex.


      Surely the fundamental problem is that people are homeless or starving in the first place?

      I can see what you're saying, but I've never been fully persuaded by this line of argument - how is offering someone a choice between two things less ethical than not offering them the choice and leaving them to starve? Even though we see the thing being offered as bad, to the person who chooses it, it is better than the alternative.

      Of course, the most ethical answer is to give them the money without them having to do anything - but people who argue against experimentation or prostitution tend not to advocate giving them money instead.

  23. Toward what end? by Lijemo · · Score: 1

    Is this reasearch to help medical patients with pain management by adding the knowlege that keeping hydrated is an important component of that?

    Or is it to conduct illegal and ineffectual "intellegence gathering" on illegally held "enemy combatents"?

    Not meant as a flame. I'm very curious in who is conducting this research and why-- because this knowlege is definitely a two-edged sword, depending on how it's used. (Well, that's true of ANY knowlege. In this case, the contrast is just sharper...)

    1. Re:Toward what end? by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      Yes

  24. Being thirsty makes you more sensitive to pain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind me to take a six-pack the next time I visit the dentist.

  25. thirsty for a beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I feel pain usually I haven't meet my MDR for beer that day.

  26. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by RomulusNR · · Score: 5, Funny

    by the late Fereydoon Batmanghelidj M.D.

    Does he introduce himself by saying, "I'm Batman!...ghelidj" ?

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  27. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by jsprat · · Score: 5, Funny

    What few people realize is that Dr. Batmanghelidj is really Bruce Wayneghelidj's alter ego. Everybody knows that the Wayneghelidj Water has a stranglehold on the world's water distribution networks, so who really benefits if everyone drinks more water? ;)

  28. and why did this make the slashdot front page tod. by bariswheel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It seems to me Linux officially announcing that they will now have their own distribution of linux and make their own operating system should hold more ground right...?

    --
    Insinct is stronger than Upbringing - Irish Proverb
  29. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by aliscool · · Score: 1

    male chest hair...

    you ever see a play ground that didn't have a little grass on it?

  30. Hospice Experiences by heresyoftruth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this is an interesting study. When I nurse, I work hospice. When people are close to death they often tell us to allow them to become dehydrated because it decreases pain sensations. I am curious how this information fits into that.

    Of course, we get orders to pump enough morphine into them that the whole thing might be considered mute.

    --
    Nothing hides evidence like a stew. -Gus Pratt
    1. Re:Hospice Experiences by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 0

      > Of course, we get orders to pump enough morphine into them that the whole thing > might be considered mute. I think the term you are looking for is moot, but depending on how much you gave them mute too could be a better descriptor.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    2. Re:Hospice Experiences by z4r4thu5tr4 · · Score: 1

      no nitpicking, but it's "moot"

    3. Re:Hospice Experiences by Jongpil+Yun · · Score: 1

      Mild dehydration increases pain, extreme dehydration dulls it a lot.

    4. Re:Hospice Experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOOT, not MUTE

      ARGH! That grates!!!

  31. Thirst by whoop · · Score: 1

    Thirst is a fairly interesting thing to study. Working with kidney failure patients, it's a difficult thing for them to manage. Urges like sex, hunger, etc can be dismissed in one's mind with a little work. But thirst is impossible to get away from. The only way to get rid of the urge is to drink. For renal patients, it's doubly hard as drinking then leads to a series of other problems for them.

    Combine that with being stuck with two big 15g needle three times a week, and you see a lot of pain. It's interesting that the two can be linked. I have seen how one day a person may only slightly flinch, another day and they are writhing much worse.

  32. Hey doc, it hurts when i push on it by themadplasterer · · Score: 1

    These results are rubbish. The test is first being done on a hydrated patient and he feels pain, later he is mildly dehydrated and the same pain is inflicted on the same area as before and obviously it hurts more than before. ie Chinese water torture etc. Hey doc, it hurts when i push on it...."Yeah, well stop pushing on it!"

  33. Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy. Trail.

  34. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by RKenshin1 · · Score: 0

    Traction

  35. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by TerminaMorte · · Score: 1

    So men were given chest hair so that small children wouldn't harm themselves playing on their chests?

  36. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    http://nancymarkle.com/fatter/
    Main stream medicine also is looking into this. No need to start following halfbaked weirdos with a few good ideas.

  37. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Copid · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I particularly like Dr. B's statement:

    I hold the idea that the AIDS is not a viral disease, but is a metabolic disorder precipitated by an exaggerated way of life.
    Although, I must admit that, "'Bad' Cholesterol: A Myth and a Fraud" was nearly as interesting.

    While it's interesting when somebody smart posits a contrarian view or two, the people who seem to think that essentially everything about prevailing theory is wrong are usually... well... nuts. I couldn't help but notice that very few of his papers had anything in them that indicated that they were actually published by a journal other than his own. Coincidence?

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  38. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by rolfwind · · Score: 1
    Particularly compelling in that book is Dr Batmanghelidj's thorough scientific explanation on how 'diet' sodas actually substantially contribute to weight gain.


    Could you expound (summarize) on that, please?

    I quit diet soda myself a while back on a diet, but since I was eating less, I can't say whether it made much difference. A friend of mine quit Diet Coke a while back without changes in eating habits and did lose 20 pounds.

    I didn't know why, but I attributed it because Diet Coke contains quite a bit of caffeine, and caffiene is hypothesized to screw with the body's insulin. There were also studies that suggested the sweet taste from the artificial sweetener caused the body to pump up the insulin in anticipation.
  39. Wait, I need to get a drink by 2443W · · Score: 1

    So that's why my cross-country coach always told us to drink plenty of water...

  40. I will get... by mondoterrifico · · Score: 2, Funny

    I will get first post in 30 minutes, when everyone that ran off to drink water
    has to go pee. My evil plan is working!
    Muhahaha
    haha
    ha
    :)

  41. (OT) Playgrounds without grass by 246o1 · · Score: 1

    Yes. They are the rule in Japan, rather than the exception. No clue why, not being Japanese and apparently not curious enough to find this shit out.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  42. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by kfg · · Score: 1

    Because, like, ya know, they're mammals.

    KFG

  43. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by Rebelgecko · · Score: 1

    Exactly!

    --
    CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
  44. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all males have chest hair.

    I've got a Mediterannean background, and I've got just the right genes to grow it like a monkey. I grow thick facial hair, thick body hair, and apparently have no baldness action.

    My brother, on the other hand, grows sparce body hair, can't grow a goatee, and is balding at a disturbing rate.

    And aside.. I'm thinking James Bond, "You Only Think Twice": "Japanese have beautiful bald skin."

  45. Higher Histamine Levels -- Pain by ovapositor · · Score: 1

    He identified that dehydration elevates histamine levels. Higher levels contribute directly to pain. Quite clever really...

    He may have said some wacky things... as do most docs that figure out one aspect of physiology and assume they have the whole figured out. In this regard, he is typical

  46. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't remember the specifics, but I believe it has to do with your body wanting more 'sweets' after drinking diet soda.

  47. I am sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there's a lot of experts on what combination of dehydration, sleep deprivation and beating causes more pain in many countries. Too bad they don't publish very much.

  48. Re:about time for a new university... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The medical community still uses data gathered from the Nazi's 'experiments' in the concentration camps during WW2. Despite the experiments and their manner being morally repugnant, the view taken was that facts are facts and here are some well-researched facts that are still valid - just try not to think how they were gathered.

  49. Re:about time for a new university... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

    Auschwitz...

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  50. curiously opposite by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have been the victim of "heat stroke" at least once. I set out for a hike at Navajo National Monument that was deemed a "strenuous dayhike". At the time I was engaged heavily in wilderness trips in the desert conditions of NM, AZ, CO, and UT. On this trip we ednded up running out of water (that we were promised we would be able to refill by rangers) and getting seriously bonked by dehydration. This is the one and only time I have ever hallucinated. On the 8 mile return trip we started to get loopy at about mile 6. I fell into a very "sharp" bush at about mile 7 or 7.5 and did not feel any pain at all despite the fact that this bush almost left me with permanent scars. This was also very problematic because the "falling into bushes" occured VERY close to the edge of the canyon itself, but we (at the time) did not seem to care about nearly falling over the 300-500ft drop. These problems were reflected in the behavior of the entire group (I was not the only one to experience a lack of pain/conern). Lack of hydration left us with an impaired sense of judgement and an impaired ability to sense pain/danger.

    I have also been trained as a Wilderness First Responder and can tell you that at least "extremely thirsty" people have such an incredibly deranged world view that definitions of "pain" get thrown right out the window.

    1. Re:curiously opposite by Jongpil+Yun · · Score: 3, Informative

      TFA mentions that while minor dehydration exacerbates pain, extreme dehydration dulls it.

    2. Re:curiously opposite by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

      just a little anecdote

  51. Huh. by Mithrandir86 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean I should hold my next S&M party out in the desert?

  52. Sex? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Does this mean sex is better when you are thirsty?

    1. Re:Sex? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Well, it all comes down to what kind of sex one prefers. You apparently prefer the painful kind.

  53. makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They induced thirst with a saline solution, presumably a hypertonic solution. A raise in extracellular sodium would have increased the current of excitable tissues like nerves that transmit pain.

  54. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    +5, Informative? More like -50,000, fucking retarded batshit insane troll.

    http://www.snopes.com/medical/myths/8glasses.asp

    Drinking more water, "cures many diseases like arthritis, angina, migraines, hypertension and asthma." Sure thing, Doc. Speaking of water, have I got a bridge to sell you...

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  55. the real question is by crashelite · · Score: 0

    does it work the same way with pleasure?

    --
    (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
  56. Hmm, ethics by Petra_von_Kant · · Score: 1

    Having been at both bleeding edges of medical research as both subject and investigator, it depends very much on the respective ethics panels (my background is nuclear medicine).

    There have been a number of studies that I've had performed on me including, but not limited to:

    Induction of blisters by heat and or vacuum, then having the resultant fluid drained every 2 hours for 24 hours

    Electric shocks to the earlobe to measure pain response 3 times per week for 2 hours over a 3 month period

    Drinking 100mL of neat EtOH and swallowing a radio transmitter with a 5 metre antenna whilst having 50mL of blood pulled every 2 hours for 24 hours, with the final indignation of having the radio transmitter being pulled out via the antenna by the same route

    These were not fun, but laying around in a PET whilst being infused with 18-F deoxyglucose and having the aforementioned poking and prodding performed sounds like a walk in the park, but then again, the people performing these things are a pretty effete bunch coming as they do from Australia's wanna be city of Melbourne, very strange bunch of people down there.
    But I digress, if you really, really want to perform these experiments, as long as there is no long term sequale and I can't see any reason for not doing them (yeah, I'd be happy to put my hand up, believe me, I'm no hero, nor am I a masochist).

    Cheers and all the very beast, oops, sorry, best

    1. Re:Hmm, ethics by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      Drinking 100mL of neat EtOH and swallowing a radio transmitter with a 5 metre antenna

      The drink was just to get you to swallow the transmitter. They probably didn't think they could get anyone to do it sober.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    2. Re:Hmm, ethics by Petra_von_Kant · · Score: 1

      Nahhhh, nothing so cute, we had to fast 24 hours then drink the EtOH so as to study gastric motility.
      Most threw up either the EtOH, transmitter or both, not to mention a fair splash of bile.
      One poor nucmed tech became jaundiced and remained that way for a few weeks, her bilirubin was through the roof.
      Mind you, she was accident prone, not long after, she was crossing the road outside between the hospital and the research lab and was virtually slit in half by an out of control motorcycle accelerating away from traffic lights.
      Poor old Deb spent the next 6 months in traction and undergoing continual surgery.
      Ahhhh, the joys of hospital life .........

  57. The line is not clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If willing and unwilling were so easily judged, rape trials would be a lot shorter.

    A person may be 'willing' but still coerced. The more dangerous something is, the more inducement you'd need... which naturally leads you to target people who are at a disadvantage. And then skip the inducement altogether. It's a really steep slope. Add the fact that it's an experiment which means you don't know what-all is going to happen, and it adds up to too much risk for risk-averse institutions. In a word, lawyers.

    1. Re:The line is not clear. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      If willing and unwilling were so easily judged, rape trials would be a lot shorter.

      Rape trials would also be a lot shorter if it was common practice for partners to sign a contract before sex, as would presumably be the case in medical experiments.

      (I agree with your general point - but I don't think the analogy to sex is valid.)

  58. Mod parent down by Mose250 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Will somebody please mod the parent comment down? I don't think I have to do much more than quote from one of the "Doctor's" papers:

    From "AIDS: More Convincingly A Metabolic Disorder:"

    Although the total attention of AIDS research is directed toward its predicted viral etiology, the intestinal stress and tissue cortisone release factor inducd physiology of the body, over a long period of time, and dependent on the mode and frequency of homosexual practice, can possibly be the precipitating cause of this condition. It is proposed that in homosexuals, AIDS is an intestinal stress induced metabolic disorder and, opiod peptides being markers of stress to the regulatory systems of the body, excessive use of opiates can possibly cause an indirect promotion of stress physiology that can bring about the associated immune system inhibition and disturbance"

    Translated: Gay people get AIDS because they have too much anal sex.

    This "doctor" is entirely incredible, possibly homophobic, and a quack in the most negative sense of the word. No creedence whatsoever should be given to anything that he's written.

    1. Re:Mod parent down by defile · · Score: 1

      This "doctor" is entirely incredible, possibly homophobic, and a quack in the most negative sense of the word. No creedence whatsoever should be given to anything that he's written.

      If you take the whole of a human life, you will no doubt find intolerable or contradictory speech. History books are good at filtering out the lunacy and elevating the achievements. But people who live today and don't have the benefit of being seen through history books. They're just the whole ordinary human package, their strengths and their flaws equally visible.

      Even the great Richard Feynman is not above reproach. It would be easy to portray him as a sexist womanizer. Imagine if you got hung up on that and refused to read about his life and works. You'd do yourself a disservice. And what a shame that would be. Clearly, it's better to consider the ideas independent of the character.

      Dr. Batmanghelidj's AIDS paper is decades old, written when what little information was available was hard to trust and his peers had alternate theories. We know much more today. Maybe he stuck to it out of hubris, but irregardless, that should not disqualify his other studies. Character attacks are never good science.

      His study on Peptic Ulcers in a rather unique environment is more worthy of consideration: http://216.122.230.12/pdf/peptic_ulcer.pdf

      Also, there's no evidence that he has an anti-gay agenda, no matter how much of his research says sticking it in the bum may make boo boo.

    2. Re:Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and straight people never have unprotected anal sex?

  59. Re:test: don't read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >. I failed this test. I read it.

  60. Re:Terry Schaivo, anyone?? by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 0

    Why was this trolled?

  61. Selective patient group by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

    Actually that raises an interesting problem. There are people who are very averse to pain. How many of these people are going to sign up for this study? Few if any. What you're doing is selecting for a group of people who for whatever reason don't mind pain. Odds are they're going to give selective test results as well.

  62. Also that statement is pretty provably false by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AIDS develops in people infected with the HIV virus and not elsewhere, it happens in 100% of cases, given a long enough time, and it happens in all regious of the world, to peopel of all different lifestyles. Thus it's orety well proven that indeed the HIV virus is the cause of AIDS.

    Now of course it's always possible that this is wrong, but you'd need some pretty major proof to make that case. My guess is you are right, the guy is a crackpot. Doesn't mean that he doesn't perhaps have a good idea or two, but I'd be wary of what he says in general.

    1. Re:Also that statement is pretty provably false by magarity · · Score: 1

      Thus it's orety well proven that indeed the HIV virus is the cause of AIDS.
       
      I've read this sentence several times and can't figure out what the heck "orety well proven" means. Is it like "understanding a priori"?

    2. Re:Also that statement is pretty provably false by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Yes I was and what do you mean "non-qwerty" typos? That is precisely a qwerty typo, p and o are right next to each other. I was aiming for p, and hit o. Happening to me a lot since I got an ergonomic keyboard and I can't touch type. The lack of a second t was again a keyboard problem for the most part. The keys depress easier than I'm used to, but require complete depression to register. I'm prone to hit a key, think it worked, but nothing actually typed.

      Also, where would you get English being non-native from that? That's not the kind of error a non-native speaker would be likely to make. They might sub an incorrect word or something, but that's the kind of error you get when someone knows what they are after, but has a mechanical problem in entering it.

      Either way, that's a perfect example of a qwerty typo.

  63. Pain prioritized? by peterfa · · Score: 1
    ...perhaps a survival method so that pain is prioritized over thirst.

    I call bs.

    If one's thirst was satasfied, then pain reduces. Then there is less urge to take care of the pain. This is in contrast to the idea that pain is to be prioritized over thirst. What it sounds like to me is that water has to do with pain management, or in healing.

  64. Skaters certainly know this by Centurix · · Score: 1

    I used to skateboard around with a 1 litre bottle of water during the day, not just to re-hydrate during the hot days but because it seemed to dull the odd knocks and scrapes.

    Mind you, skateboarding drunk removes quite a lot more pain, but also increases the number of painful events.

    I remember one surreal moment when I took the "axe" along with me to Bournemouth while attending a re-enactment of a battle for the english civil war society. We got dressed up in our cavalier kit, did a day of rehearsals, went to the local pub, got smashed and rode through Poole at 2am. It was like I was flying.

    --
    Task Mangler
  65. Dehydration and Pain? Common sense by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    without the need for technomumbojumbo, sometimes.

    Consider having the flu, feeling miserable, not wanting to piss to save your life, not wanting to eat, and not wanting to get in the shower to perk up the spirits.

    Well, tho I've been told that showering while having the flu could kill me, I don't give a damn. I just CAN'T be in bed filthy, salty and sticky from sweating my ass off from the flu. I drink water like mad, eat Vietnamese chicken noodle/veggie soup if I can (and not campbells-- that shit makes me even sicker just tasting and not even swallowing it...even in the 60s when I was sick I'd throw up the campbells soup my mome forcefed to me..). And, I make the pissing continue, take zinc, Vitamin C and try not to feel too down. When I do it right, I am over the flu symptoms (the worst of them, at least) in under 3 days WITHOUT TAKING MEDS.

    I once had a massive headache, probably like a migraine. I've never to my knowledge had migraines, but about 3 times about 6 months apart I had mind-busting headaches. I though my skull would explode ANY minute. It probably was due to not drinking enough water, eating too much junk food, and having bad enough luck to catch some strain of flu that didn't give flu symptoms. I just wanted to DIE. I couldn't even use the bathroom-- I had no indications or "sensations" to go. I thought I would die. But, I didn't go to the hospital. I suffered thru it and drank water, juices and kept warm and peed out what I could.

    Now, think of those shipwrecked people who are about to be rescued. Often they could have been marooned at sea for day. It doesn't HAVE to be hot weather to dehydrate a person. Being in cold water for a few days (especially sea water which generally is (salty and therefore) unfit for human consumption unless crudely but sufficiently filtered).

    By the time the rescuers arrive, these poor souls have been struggling to stay afloat, burning up energy, starving, and borderline or fully hallucinogenic to the point that sometimes the Coast Guard rescuers end up being drowned by delirious, flailing, and dangerous victims. Sometimes, the rescuers, recalling prior shipmates or rescuers who drowned, end up having to let the flailing victims succumb to the sea.

    Now, for all the coders who sit in a chair all day and munch on candy, chips, pizza, and drink sugar-loaded or "beverages" that have more to do with junk than actual water (coffee, diet drinks, regular soda drinks, power drinks and so on...), be careful. It is necessary to keep that sugar intake low, or at least get plenty of water, walking, exercise, and so on to keep things in balance.

    Just recall years ago when the Los Angeles plan to remove soda machines from school campuses sent the soda and sugar drinks industry into piss-hot, venomous backlash. All kinds of anecdotal and measured evidence was there against the selling of soda to kids:

    --The kids drank way too many (more than 3 or 4 drinks a day (I alone drank 3 or 4 Dr. Peppers in the 8th grade, in 1979 FOR BREAKFAST and had 2 or 3 accompanying 3 Musketeers...)

    --The kids' vision was progressively worsening (in some cases)

    --The kids were in some cases hyperactive, inattentive, unhealthy, tired, and exhibited other things

    --Kids were spending more money on JUNK FOOD and soda pop and skipping out on (debateably tasty) lunches....

    In the end, rather than lose the money and machine locations, the pop sellers put in more water and fruit drinks and such.

    But, cutting out natural water for sugar water in the absence of exercise and a balanced diet surely can lead to brain disorders...

    (OK, that last sentence definitely is leaving me wide open to attack...hmmm, took about 16 minutues... ummm, minutes to type this out...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  66. Conspiracy theory thinking process detected by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Sounds like conspiracy theory type thinking: "I know this thing that all the rest of the people are wrong about."

    It has to be true, because you have a lot of your self-worth invested in the fact that you're smarter/more informed/more open-minded than everyone else. You're on the inside, and all the rest of us have you to thank for telling us this amazing new counter-intuitive "fact" that contradicts the conventional wisdom. Hence the bold in your comment, I guess.

    Careful of falling into that trap.

    I'm pretty sure food causes weight gain. Diet sodas might lead people to eat more food, but it's the food that matters.

  67. Witch burning in the 21st century by toby · · Score: 1, Insightful
    While it's interesting when somebody smart posits a contrarian view or two, the people who seem to think that essentially everything about prevailing theory is wrong are usually... well... nuts.

    There's an ocean of difference between being thought nuts and being nuts. Challenging conventional thinking practically guarantees the former, in our age of deadly conformity. However, I find no evidence for anything other than solid scientific research in his book. Dr. Batmanghelidj is certainly not alone in questioning orthodox theories about AIDS.

    I couldn't help but notice that very few of his papers had anything in them that indicated that they were actually published by a journal other than his own.

    The fact that his Foundation chooses to make additional research available under their own banner, in addition to the several papers in independent journals, does not prove it is all hokum. It is not as if peer reviewed journals have a clean slate, given the continual trickle of hoax results (recently Korean Hwang Woo-Suk, Bell Labs' Henrik Schon) so I am not sure that your point is as strong as you may think.

    Dr Batmanghelidj was certainly well aware of the disinterest of industry in his findings; imagine if the popular conception that chemicals should be the universal first resort were rejected in favour of treating chronic dehydration as a first step! That his views are commercially unpalatable (like those of AIDS iconoclasts) is hardly commentary on the quality of his research.

    I stop to defend the man because I am tired of the same perennial kneejerk "if this guy has the answer why haven't we seen it on CNN?" reactions to any idea that slightly tweaks our age's mental enslavement. Let's ask the two questions: Does he have any kind of medical answer (hundreds of his patients are convinced he does)? And if so, we can move on to the next important question: Why are independent thinkers so carefully hidden from view and meticulously discredited in the public media?

    Let people assess it for themselves, try his therapies, and perhaps add to the rather impressive roster of testimonials he offers in his book!

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by Copid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's an ocean of difference between being thought nuts and being nuts. Challenging conventional thinking practically guarantees the former, in our age of deadly conformity. However, I find no evidence for anything other than solid scientific research in his book. Dr. Batmanghelidj is certainly not alone in questioning orthodox theories about AIDS.

      As I said, it's great when somebody brings in a refreshing point of view. At the same time, when your points of view are always "refreshing" it might mean that you're just stirring up trouble to sell books (or you're simply a kook). The probability of being right given that you're unable to convince the astounding majority of experts of your case is generally not high. It happens, but I'm afraid that Dr. Batmanghelidj is not in good company on the average. Yes, he's not alone in questioning the HIV => AIDS orthodoxy, he is damn near alone, and while serious research in antiretroviral drugs has made a dent in the appearance of AIDS in HIV infected people, I'm not sure what the people who deny the link have managed to do to treat the disease.

      The fact that his Foundation chooses to make additional research available under their own banner, in addition to the several papers in independent journals, does not prove it is all hokum.

      No, certainly not. At least, not by itself. However, if you combine it with the fact that only a small portion of his work is actually published and the larger volume of it is self published, that's a little more suspect. Add to that the fact that his really controversial stuff and the work that's really central to what makes him stand out as a "scientist" is also the stuff that has never made it through peer review, and it starts smelling a little less authoritative. This is the same set of arguments creationists and other groups selling pseudoscientific nonsense tend to use. Sometimes we need to remember some of the lessons Carl Sagan taught us: But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

      It is not as if peer reviewed journals have a clean slate, given the continual trickle of hoax results (recently Korean Hwang Woo-Suk, Bell Labs' Henrik Schon) so I am not sure that your point is as strong as you may think.

      Knocking the peer review process generally earns you some kook points as well. What percentage of peer reviewed articles do you suppose are fraudulent? What percentage of ground breaking work (which his AIDS work certainly would be) that makes it through peer review do you think is wrong? Now compare that number with the percentage of "ground breaking" work posted by random folks on the web. There's a reason good college professors try to teach their students that "got it from the web" is second only to "heard it in a bar" as a serious academic reference.

      Dr Batmanghelidj was certainly well aware of the disinterest of industry in his findings; imagine if the popular conception that chemicals should be the universal first resort were rejected in favour of treating chronic dehydration as a first step! That his views are commercially unpalatable (like those of AIDS iconoclasts) is hardly commentary on the quality of his research.

      And then the appeal to the widespread conspiracy. Adding up the points...

      Certainly, our society does tend to over medicate. Medication is a profitable industry, too. But don't you think you'd be seeing more whistle blowers if it were all some conspiracy to keep us taking AIDS drugs? Something doesn't smell right with that assumption. Sometimes when nobody agrees with you, you're just wrong. It doesn't always mean you're a misunderstood genius or you're tearing down The Man.

      I stop to defend the man because I am tired of the sam

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    2. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by toby · · Score: 1, Interesting
      his really controversial stuff and the work that's really central to what makes him stand out as a "scientist" is also the stuff that has never made it through peer review

      Well, first, by definition "controversial stuff" is less likely to survive review. That's how Schon got his stuff through: it looked very, very plausible; it was just not reproducible in any way (heck, it was fake). I have no doubt Dr Batmanghelidj believed his results reproducible - and from what I've read, his assertions are not only based on his own trials, but are easily tested.

      Secondly, it is odd that you would use the construction "what makes him stand out as a scientist". Is that your own phrase? It seems an odd one to use, when you are saying that he does not pass conventional criteria for accepted "standing": being published widely but not too widely - and don't, whatever you do, put any non-reviewed papers on your site or they will conclude you're a kook!

      Knocking the peer review process generally earns you some kook points as well.

      Judging by the trajectory of my post's moderation this evening, I am going to earn more kook points than karma points by citing the late Dr F.B. I'm okay with that.

      don't you think you'd be seeing more whistle blowers

      Don't you think there are very powerful mechanisms to suppress them? I read an aphorism recently along the lines, "Control a man's support and you control the man." We know that the first effective restraint on people is financial, for instance. One does not have to get fully melodramatic and invoke Lynchian Cowboy chats or late night telephone calls here.

      Sometimes when nobody agrees with you, you're just wrong.

      I'd be thrilled if somebody would investigate the possibility that he might be right about something. You don't seem at all inclined to do that. Your energy is devoted to sitting on the fence, discounting iconoclasts as kooks without a trial (on circumstance alone); and awarding "kook points" to their defenders. A harmless hobby but not very helpful.

      little more than anecdotal evidence

      I believe Dr Batmanghelidj tested his theories clinically throughout his career. However my understanding is purely based on his book; I have not read the papers.

      legions of experts are convinced that he does not

      I have not seen a single opinion that contradicts Dr Batmanghelidj on the issue of dehydration. When I said "medical answers", I meant those that concern the human body's need for water, and dehydration as an unacknowledged cause of mistreated symptoms.

      If you are referring to AIDS: What do you do when you have experts on both sides of the question? Easy! Discredit the ones whose views you don't like. Can you be certain this has not occurred on this issue? Can you be certain that you are not yourself constructing a subjective system of innuendo around this man? If you can, please explain the source of this certitude.

      As for the non-experts: You can stop one thousand people on the street and 997 of them will happily lynch you for telling them you hold an opinion about AIDS that differs from what they heard on TV. It's that kind of hot-button issue.

      I would assert to you that they are not. They have a hard time making it past rigiorous peer review because they tend to be wrong.

      I disagree.

      I put people like Batmanghelidj, Dembski, Behe, and anybody else who shuns peer review

      I have not seen any evidence that Dr Batmanghelidj "shuns peer review"! You're trying to construct your own caricature of the man that can hardly be based on the facts you've gained from his web site - as far as I know, you haven't read his books.

      They claim to be a persecuted minority when, in reality, they have more press and more clout than much of the scientific establishment.

      In the same vein: That is absurd. What clout does Dr B have? You hadn't heard of him until this post. What effect has he had on m

      --
      you had me at #!
    3. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, no matter what this guy is saying, if it helps people great. I personally think that it is all just the power of suggestion but does that make it any less valid? Now, I am not saying stop takin your meds, but if your open to suggestion....but wait...not that i said that it probbly wont work anymore.....sorry

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    4. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you have to choose between exploring a diverse swath of revolutionary ideas from a generally broad perspective and making a single revolutionary idea your life's work to prove.
       
      If you're not willing to get down to the nitty-gritty-detail level of research for the benefit of you're theory, it's not likely that anyone else is going to do it for you. So, what to do? Drop the other potentially great ideas that you have so you can perform mind-numbing studies and give yawner-lectures? Or... Do you hit one idea after the next, milk them for all you can without sacrificing diversity, get labeled as a kook for not having enough "proof" for any of it... I'll take the latter, thanks. Recognition isn't my thing. Some day...a great mind will see the potential of my ideas and explore them as they should be explored.
       
      Take a look at Viktor Schauberger, as an example... Though, technological limitations may have prevented some of his work from being sufficiently explore, many of his ideas were so far out there that most scientists of the time wouldn't touch them with a 10 ft pole.

    5. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by Copid · · Score: 1

      Well, first, by definition "controversial stuff" is less likely to survive review. That's how Schon got his stuff through: it looked very, very plausible; it was just not reproducible in any way (heck, it was fake). I have no doubt Dr Batmanghelidj believed his results reproducible - and from what I've read, his assertions are not only based on his own trials, but are easily tested. Secondly, it is odd that you would use the construction "what makes him stand out as a scientist". Is that your own phrase? It seems an odd one to use, when you are saying that he does not pass conventional criteria for accepted "standing": being published widely but not too widely - and don't, whatever you do, put any non-reviewed papers on your site or they will conclude you're a kook!

      I used the construction because he no doubt holds a lot of very conventional views about biology and chemistry. Those aren't, however, what he's known for. I don't see him publishing books that say, "table salt contains sodium and chlorine." The point is that he's known for his unconventional views while at the same time, his unconventional views are the ones that have fizzled the most among the experts. Again, read his papers on his web site. The ones that actually hit the hot button issues and earned the man his notoriety are exactly the same papers that he has self-published. I can give you a nearly endless list of folks posting their own nonsense theories to the web for all to see. This man is nothing particularly special in that respect. It would be more interesting if the bulk of his academic work was not self published.

      Judging by the trajectory of my post's moderation this evening, I am going to earn more kook points than karma points by citing the late Dr F.B. I'm okay with that.

      I can't say I'm all that impressed with Slashdot's moderation system. I personally think that negative moderation should be reserved for people who are obviously trying to be disruptive. You got a bum rap. What can I say? I've been there myself.

      Don't you think there are very powerful mechanisms to suppress them? I read an aphorism recently along the lines, "Control a man's support and you control the man." We know that the first effective restraint on people is financial, for instance. One does not have to get fully melodramatic and invoke Lynchian Cowboy chats or late night telephone calls here.

      Sure, but everybody? Even the tobacco industry couldn't pull that one off. I have to point out that the vast majority of the drugs that the pharmaceutical industry is producing work. They passed double blind tests and have been shown to be effective against what they're trying to treat. If they're making it all up, they're doing a dandy job of cooking the books.

      I'd be thrilled if somebody would investigate the possibility that he might be right about something. You don't seem at all inclined to do that. Your energy is devoted to sitting on the fence, discounting iconoclasts as kooks without a trial (on circumstance alone); and awarding "kook points" to their defenders. A harmless hobby but not very helpful.

      The problem is that most people don't have time to chase down and verify every hypotheses that every guy with a typewriter can bat out. The supply of iconoclasts with wild (brilliant?) ideas is incredible. The ones to be avoided almost always display the same set of behaviors, though. They publish in the popular press or their own private journals rather than subjecting their work to the rigors of peer review. They seem to be in the minority opinion on just about everything, no matter how unrelated the different subjects may be (water, OK, but AIDS and cholesterol? Now we're starting to have a track record). They have a small group of followers and loads of anecdotal evidence without any serious statistical data. They blame flaws in the system that keep them down and suppress their brillia

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    6. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by Copid · · Score: 1
      If you're not willing to get down to the nitty-gritty-detail level of research for the benefit of you're theory, it's not likely that anyone else is going to do it for you. So, what to do? Drop the other potentially great ideas that you have so you can perform mind-numbing studies and give yawner-lectures? Or... Do you hit one idea after the next, milk them for all you can without sacrificing diversity, get labeled as a kook for not having enough "proof" for any of it... I'll take the latter, thanks. Recognition isn't my thing. Some day...a great mind will see the potential of my ideas and explore them as they should be explored.
      Recognition may not be your thing, but what about success? Dr. B. could have cured AIDS had he not been so easily distracted! Recognition clearly is his thing and research clearly is not. The vast majority of scientific and medical breakthroughs just aren't easy. You have to actually do work to make them happen.

      Take a look at Viktor Schauberger, as an example... Though, technological limitations may have prevented some of his work from being sufficiently explore, many of his ideas were so far out there that most scientists of the time wouldn't touch them with a 10 ft pole.
      For somebody who never had time to pursue things, he had a decent list of interesting patents and working inventions. At the same time, his work seems to have spawned a lot of nonsense about water that only works if you ignore everything we know about the physics of magnetism and chemistry. I suppose that even Newton did his time as an alchemist.
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    7. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by ambrosine10 · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Let people assess it for themselves, try his therapies, and perhaps add to the rather impressive roster of testimonials he offers in his book!

      Bullshit. Repeat after me: the plural of anecdote is not evidence. Only controlled experimental studies can show us if any of these BS "therapies" work.

    8. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by miro+f · · Score: 2, Informative

      Carl Sagan taught us: But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

      well, Columbus turned out to be wrong, didn't he? Lucky he stumbled into America or he'd have died for it

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    9. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by oneiron · · Score: 1

      At the same time, his work seems to have spawned a lot of nonsense about water that only works if you ignore everything we know about the physics of magnetism and chemistry.

      This is exactly what I was talking about... All that nonsense about water is garnering a little more attention, these days. Have you seen the studies that show microscopic pictures of frozen water crystals after they've been exposed to different words. Some (or all) of that "nonsense" may end up being very real phenomena. You want a mainstream example? How nonsensical is Quantum physics when you stick it next to Newtonian physics. I can't really cite examples from its history, but I'm willing to bet there were some schaubergeresque nonsensical ideas that sparked the revolution that has us where we are today. Most of what you read when you look into the history are the initial experiments that showed particles in 2 places at once, but someone had that idea before it was teste...and someone decided to test it while half of his colleagues were probably calling him a nut. Look at the string theorists of today.
      This is how science works... Hard/fast dismissal like you're promoting only holds us back. Science smells more and more like a fundamentalist religion, these days... I can almost see where the IDers are coming from when they start bagging on hardcore evolutionists to discredit their theories...

    10. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by WreathOfBarbs · · Score: 1

      In the end that only reinforces the statement. :-)

    11. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by Copid · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was talking about... All that nonsense about water is garnering a little more attention, these days. Have you seen the studies that show microscopic pictures of frozen water crystals after they've been exposed to different words. Some (or all) of that "nonsense" may end up being very real phenomena.

      Yes, I have. In fact, it's exactly what I was referring to as the worst type of pseudoscientific garbage I've seen. Masaru Emoto cherry picks through water crystals and shows us sample sizes of 1 to prove his point that prayer and good feelings change how water crystalizes. He cruises along, blissfully unaware of actual experimental procedure or the simple fact that water crystalization produces random results from which you can pick any pattern you happen to like. He and others like him put out books with extensively physics-like sounding nonsense that the public eats up like candy, but it simply has no relation to the physics that's actually understood by physicists, throwing around words like "energy" and "force" as religious terms rather than words with serious meaning.

      Some (or all) of that "nonsense" may end up being very real phenomena. You want a mainstream example? How nonsensical is Quantum physics when you stick it next to Newtonian physics.

      The difference is quantum mechanics made sense to the physicists of the time and had data to back it up. Emoto and his ilk don't have the data and they're not making any sense. Yes, QM is weird stuff and highly counterintuitive, but it works because it's backed by data, calculations, and expert review. Emoto's work is designed to be intuitive and comforting and great for publishing in books on new age health, but there's nothing there that actually realtes to reality.

      Sure, our current understanding of physics could be totally wrong, but think about it for a minute. Our current models work well. It's going to take some serious data (not just cherry picked snowflakes) to show that he's right and the rest of the world's chemists and physicists are wrong. Until then, he's just another guy with a crazy idea and unfortunately, most of the guys on the 'net with crazy ideas actually are crazy.

      can't really cite examples from its history, but I'm willing to bet there were some schaubergeresque nonsensical ideas that sparked the revolution that has us where we are today.

      I would hardly call today's water worship a revolution.

      Most of what you read when you look into the history are the initial experiments that showed particles in 2 places at once, but someone had that idea before it was teste...and someone decided to test it while half of his colleagues were probably calling him a nut.

      If you look at the history of quantum mechancs, you'll find that it was all hammered out in the scientific literature. It got as far as it did through peer review and constructive collaboration. Nobody jumped out and published "Probability and Electrons: A New Healing Revolution" and sold it to the general public. In fact, most of the general public doesn't have the first clue about QM to this day. The work was done scientifically and subject to scrutiny. That's what separates quantum physics from net.kookery.

      Look at the string theorists of today. This is how science works... Hard/fast dismissal like you're promoting only holds us back.

      I promote hard and fast dismissal of ideas that have no good data behind them and use sloppy or misleading methods as junk science. Guilty as charged. The string theorists of today are not dismissed as nuts. They aren't holding the interest of most of the physics community mainly because they're unable to generate data to test their ideas. Once that happens, I'm sure they'll be given more attention (or dismissed if the data doesn't work out in their favor). In the mean time, it's looked at as an interesting idea with so

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    12. Re:Witch burning in the 21st century by oneiron · · Score: 1

      I like what you're trying to convey...pretty much all around, but I still think you're far too dismissive and detail oriented. I'd like to delve a little deeper into some of the stuff we've discussed, but I really can't hang with you when it comes to time invested/data/knowledge. I'll make a mental note to revisit some of the more ethereal schauberger stuff with you when I get a chance to start digging into it a little more, but I can't make you any promises. I've been intending to read up on him pretty hard, but I just haven't found the time.

      Suffice to say, based on vague recollections of infinitely more "scientific" (in your sense of the word) studies than you've alluded to, I see a hint of promise in the whole living water thing... Please don't mistake me for one of those goofballs that jumps on every 'healing revolution' bandwagon that drives by as long as it has a faint odor of science. I enjoy reading about the somewhat misdirected genius of people like Schauberger and Wilhelm Reich...then exploring what types of modern developments have come out of it. I can't wait for the string theorists to get their act together because I can envision the wacky theories of people like these two being totally elucidated by string theory. Overly optomistic? Maybe... Somewhere between you and me, I think there might just be an ideal balance.

  68. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dr. B.: "I hold the idea that the AIDS is not a viral disease, but is a metabolic disorder precipitated by an exaggerated way of life."

    Me: "I have a needle with HIV in blood sera. So you would not mind if I..."

    Dr. B: "Uh, wait..."

    >> Jab.

    Me: "Oops."

    Dr. B: "Croak."

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  69. Statement from Doctor Fereydoon Batmanghelidj by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    "I can call singularity educators the most putrid name on Earth and claim they eat cow-dung ambrosia, but the lying ass bastards will not even object - for they know I am right and that any debate will indict them for the evil they perpetuate against the students and future humanity."
    Oh wait, I tuned in to Doctor Gene Ray, Cubic and Wisest Human, by mistake...
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  70. Re:about time for a new university... by koreaman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, why shouldn't they? Not using the data isn't going to change the fact that the experiments happened. In fact, if they didn't use said data, the concentration camp victims would have been tortured in vain.

  71. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by ataahdc · · Score: 1

    The question is, which contributes more to weight gain? Diet sodas, or regular (sugared) sodas? There's no question in my mind which does worse in the end.

  72. Aspirine, placebo effect? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Does this mean some of the effect of painkillers is due to drinking water?

  73. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    lost teeth (punch to the face in a bar)

    You, dada21? I cannot conceive of any reason anyone would ever want to punch you in the face. The thought of it! I'm incredulous.

    Or maybe I just spend too much time in the "anarchocapitalist-only" watering holes :-)

  74. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by rasqual · · Score: 1

    Somehow this reminds me of the "international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids," in spite of which "we will prevail, in peace and freedom from fear, and in true health, through the purity and essence of our natural fluids."

    Good grief.

  75. Re:Terry Schaivo, anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if we decide to pull the plug on someone who's still living and partially cognative

    That's right, don't let those pesky facts get in the way of your Christofascist propoganda.

  76. You could read the book, but here's a summary by toby · · Score: 1
    Dr Batmanghelidj heads a section in his book, "Diet Sodas Can Cause Weight Gain." He does touch on the liver's role in the body's reaction to artificial sweeteners in particular, but there are several processes which contribute to the gain, including confusion between thirst and hunger signals. All in all it is an interesting argument to follow.

    The following is no substitute for reading the text or classroom study of the text (emphasis and links mine):

    This paradox in our understanding of the relationship between taking a sweetener that does not directly contribute to the total calorie intake of the body and weight gain needs explanation.

    ... It is assumed these manufactured beverages can replace the needs of the body for water. It is assumed, just because these beverages contain water, the body will be adequately served. This assumption is wrong. ... To understand the above statement, we need to recognize some simple principles of anatomy and physiology of the brain that regulate eating and drinking.

    ... Caffeine, one of the main components of most sodas, is a drug. ... [it] has diuretic properties. It is physiologically a dehydrating agent. This ... is the main reason a person is forced to drink so many cans of soda every day and never be satisfied. The water does not stay in the body long enough. At the same time, many persons confuse their feeling of thirst for water: Thinking they have consumed enough "water" that is in the soda, they ... begin to eat more than their body's need for food.

    ... Caffeine ... stimulates the brain/body even when a person is exhausted ... it seems that caffeine lowers the threshold of ATP stockpile control. Stored ATP is used for some functions that would not normally gain access to it

    ... In the intestinal tract, aspartame converts to two highly excitatory neurotransmitter amino acids: aspartate and phenylalanine, as well as methyl alcohol/formaldehyde - wood alcohol.

    ... If caffeine converts ATP to AMP, a spent energy 'ash', aspartate converts GTP energy stockpile to GMP. Both AMP and GMP are spent fuels; they cause thirst/hunger to replace the lost fuel stockpiles in the brain cells. Thus, sodas cause indiscriminate overuse of energy reserves of cells in the brain.

    It is a well recognized scientific fact that spent fuel (AMP) does cause hunger. Caffeine causes addiction ... Hence, caffeinated diet sodas in sedentary persons must cause weight gain; they indirectly stimulate more food intake because of the brain's forced use of its energy reserves. Bear in mind that only some of the energy value of foods eaten will be used by the brain. The rest of the consumed energy will be stored in the form of fat if not used by muscle activity. ...

    The more important reflex that occurs is a brain reaction to sweet taste. ... "cephalic phase response". A conditioned reflex becomes established ... that is associated with the introduction of new energy into the body. When sweet taste stimulates the tongue, the brain programs the liver to prepare for the acceptance of new energy - sugar - from outside. The liver, in turn, stops the manufacture of sugar from the protein and starch reserves of the body and instead begins to store the metabolic fuels that are circulating in the blood. As Michael G. Tardoff, Mark I. Friedman, and other scientists have shown, cephalic phase responses alter the metabolic activity in favor of nutrient storage; the fuel available for conversion is reduced which leads to the development of appetite.

    ... Using aspartame, several scientists have shown a similar urge to overeat in humans. Blundel an

    --
    you had me at #!
  77. Dissassociation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sociopath?

    Disassociation of pain signals with the feeling of being "hurt" is a response to intense pain, and apparently it can also be learned through training. It is not the same as people who literally feel no pain.

    Back 10-15 years ago I had cluster headaches that came about every 3 months. Cluster headaches have been described as "probably the worst pain that humans experience". The only way I could cope was to mentally disassociate the pain with the feeling of hurt. Basically I would mentally take myself to another place and watch myself feel pain as an outside observer, but not actually experience it in the first person.

    The thought process was probably something like:
    "Oh look, my body is telling me that I am in intense pain. How interesting."

    I'm not as good at it anymore since I haven't gotten headaches in over a decade, but my threshold for pain is still much higher than average. I'd like to think that doesn't make me a sociopath.

  78. Re:Terri Chiavo by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    RTFA, this was a study on people who still have their brain.

  79. exercise by mathgodleo · · Score: 1

    This could be another good reason to follow the advice of being well-hydrated before/during serious exercise.

  80. Hey, by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 1

    Quick! Someone tell Jack Bauer!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
  81. What about Japan's human bio-war labs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to wikipedia, the Allies failed to charge Japanese scientists and officials with war crimes for doing horrible, biological warfare experiments on live Chinese citizens in exchange for the data collected. Does that make it Ok?

    1. Re:What about Japan's human bio-war labs? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      It depends on how important the data is (or how important the data are, if you're a grammar nazi.)

    2. Re:What about Japan's human bio-war labs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Allies didn't charge anyone for their firebombing either, and they didn't even get any scientific data out of that!

  82. Wee by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    It is true, which is why I always keep my partner properly hydrated.

    1. Re:Wee by fbjon · · Score: 1
      I always keep my partner properly hydrated.
      Sounds like you have sex with plants.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  83. Huh. by xx01dk · · Score: 2, Funny

    so that's why I didn't feel a thing when I fell of the balcony at that kegger...

    oh, wait...

    --
    There is simply too much glass..
  84. What we need... by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

    Is another major world war so we can resolve a bunch of these pressing scientific questions, as yet unanserable due to ethics.

  85. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there are a small number of people, close to 10% that are considered long-term non-progressors that will probably not develop AIDS from HIV before of dying of something else.

    1. Re:Actually... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      10% that are considered long-term non-progressors that will probably not develop AIDS from HIV before of dying of something else.

      Interesting. So we can conclude from your deductions that if we can persuade large numbers of cancer victims to step in front of trains before they die, we will successfully reduce the lethality of cancer.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Actually... by Aadomm · · Score: 1

      To draw that conclusion from that statement seems far from natural to be honest. Although I suppose it is technically true.

      --
      Mention the Lord of the Rings one more time and I'll more than likely kill you.
  86. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by CRC'99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    by the late Fereydoon Batmanghelidj M.D.

    Does he introduce himself by saying, "I'm Batman!...ghelidj" ?


    I don't think he'll be introducing himself to anyone anytime soon....

    --
    Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
  87. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by evil-osm · · Score: 1

    Does he introduce himself by saying, "I'm Batman!...ghelidj" ?

    Generally he enters a room like this.

    --


    E.

    Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
  88. It said MODERATE thirst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and that extreme thirst had the opposite effect, that is, the effect that you are describing now.

  89. And, in other news... by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    Consuming a large volume of alcohol is proven to relieve pain, which makes it an ideal distributable product for routy college football and spanish soccer fans, especially those whose adrenaline causes them to beat eachothers heads into a bloody pulp.

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  90. BDSM PEOPLE GET TO HAVE FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay for all the bdsm people, less drinking means more pain!

  91. Rowing Balls Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put the mouse back in the house please

  92. barbarians by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
    from Conan the Destroyer

    Princess Jehnna: I suppose nothing hurts you.
    Conan: Only pain.

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  93. Oh, man... by Silencer-7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As if that coyote didn't have it bad enough. "meep meep!" WHAM!!! "Agh....I'm so....thirsty."

    1. Re:Oh, man... by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      As if that coyote didn't have it bad enough. "meep meep!" WHAM!!! "Agh....I'm so....thirsty."

      Well, at least half the time the coyote fell into the river at the bottom of the canyon... Instant hydration!

  94. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 1

    Anyone who's had a hangover can validate this.

  95. Re:Terry Schaivo, anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The study says that pain is amplified whilst dehydrated, not that pain was caused, dumbarse.

  96. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by homesandgardens · · Score: 1

    'diet' sodas actually substantially contribute to weight gain.

    I've heard this one before. You know that defys the laws of physics right? A diet soda is: carbonated water, citric and/or phosphoric acid, flavor and a non-sugar related sweetener. There is nothing there that your body can convert to and store as body fat (or muscle for that matter, though I doubt anyone would complain if that was the case) so unless they are adding chemicals that turn your body photosynthetic and allow you to turn all that CO2 and water into glucose I don't see how this is even remotely possible.

    The place I've seen this claimed said that the study involved looking at the type of people who drink these drinks and found that alot of them were fat. Duh, the people most likely to drink a diet drink are probably doing so in an attempt to lose weight, not the other way around (the same source also claims that smoking ain't all that bad, and while I agree that occasional smoking isn't that bad, it goes on the claim that it improves your health which kind of throws their credability out the window).

    It's like saying that treadmills cause you to get out of shape because alot of people using them aren't in shape. Diet sodas do cause temporary weight gain, but it tends to disappear after a visit to the bathroom. (note: if you can tell me what his thorough scientific explanation is I'd like to hear it. I looked at the list of "scientific" papers but didn't find anything related to this topic.)

    --
    To be shpongled is to be kippered, mashed, smashed, destroyed, COMPLETELY GESCHTONKENFLAPPED.
  97. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

    There's no question in my mind which does worse in the end.

    That'd still be anal sex though, wouldn't it?

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  98. RE: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    "All my foes are spelling or grammar Nazis."

    That's because you can't fucking spell and your grammar fucking sucks. Seriously, can't you spend 15 seconds proofreading your post before clicking the "Submit" button? Even if you are incapable of detecting poorly constructed and grammatically ambiguous sentences (like your first one), you should at least be able to notice things like "peopel" and "orety". Posts like yours are physically painful to read by overly-sensitive anal-retentive types like me. In fact, reading your post caused the stick up my ass to become dislodged, requiring me to get up off my chair, go upstairs to the bathroom (as there are no bathrooms in my Mom's basement), and replace the stick with the handle to the toilet plunger. I am not used to engaging in such strenuous physical activity (except when I take my bi-monthly shower), and it's ALL YOUR FAULT.

    And that's why all of your foes are spelling or gammar Nazis.

  99. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    I didn't believe this would get a 5. Loll.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  100. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Ours · · Score: 1

    Depends on what they mean by "cure". I guess when he says "cure asthma" he means "it's good to drink more water when you have asthma" (which is true). But that wouldn't sell books as any doctor will give you that advise without the "magical properties" part. I helps, but only a little and that has medical basis: more liquid in the body helps unclog the alveoles in the lungs. And I mean helps. I doesn't save the day.

    --
    "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
  101. Re:Completely OT, but I was wondering the other da by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking James Bond, "You Only Think Twice"

    Sadly, your second and final thought will be "Whoops, that should be 'Live Twice'".
    Don't let it stop you posting here though, you'll fit right in.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  102. Ethical Solution by vga_init · · Score: 1
    They'd like to do more research, but ethical issues make it tough

    Just perform the research on yourself. One person is not a large enough sample size, of course, but just find more "researchers" willing to help.

  103. Re:Terry Schaivo, anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dumbarse you're the only troll!

  104. according to a recent study... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    according to a recent study...

    Great, it must be true! No need to look any further!

  105. Re:Terri Chiavo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people who were saying that (like the husband's lawyer) were saying it about anyone.

  106. No contradiction by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    I hold the idea that the AIDS is not a viral disease, but is a metabolic disorder precipitated by an exaggerated way of life.

    Thus it's orety well proven that indeed the HIV virus is the cause of AIDS.

    I don't think these statements contradict each other, because AIDS isn't a virus, HIV is?

    1. Re:No contradiction by AtliF · · Score: 1

      But since AIDS is caused by the virus HIV, it's a viral disease i suppose.

  107. Flu and showers by achurch · · Score: 1
    Well, tho I've been told that showering while having the flu could kill me

    I can't say I've heard that, but I can say from personal experience that showering with the flu is the only time I've ever fainted; only for a few seconds, but the minute or so before that when my vision blacked out was scary as hell.

    On the other hand, I've only caught the flu once in 13 years since (compared to once every year or two until then). Cause and effect? Who knows . . .

  108. Re: Your sig by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... are physically painful to read ...



    Drink more water ?

  109. Re: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's why all of your foes are spelling or gammar Nazis.

    Heh.

  110. Poking in the name of something else by mydocuments · · Score: 1

    Poking people in the name of science is subject to all kinds of ethical considerations. Entertainment on the other hand, is exempt from such dreary considerations. So why not do the poking and pretend it's in the name of entertainment? I'll bet an experiment can be designed in such a way that it both results in useful data that couldn't be collected otherwise, all the while making millions as a "reality" show or somesuch!

  111. they know that in the marines by brenddie · · Score: 0

    my feet hurt, -drink water
    I broke a finger, -drink water
    I feel I'm gonna pass out, -drink water
    water didnt help, -well suck it up

    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
  112. Jack Bauer by Araxen · · Score: 0

    Another tool for Jack Bauer to use on 24!

  113. Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this makes Hell a lot worse.

  114. Thirsty People Feel More Pain by Better.Safe.Than.Sor · · Score: 1

    This just in . . . Water deliveries to Abu Ghraib prison have been reduced in recent days. Un-atributed sources explain, "Its . . . uh . . . a motivation exercise!"

    --
    It's all history, man. -anon
  115. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

    so who really benefits if everyone drinks more water?

    Come on, don't keep us in the dark! Tell us!

  116. Water acting like an anesthetic by Dan+Yocum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work at the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source at Argonne National Lab (IPNS) for a couple of years. While I was there ('96-98) one of the studies a post-doc did on the QENS instrument (iirc) was to study how anesthetics work. As it turns out, anesthetics enter between the walls of cells such that they recede so far from each other that the nerve senders/receptors can't make contact thus, the pain signals aren't transmitted to the brain.

    Here's a little mind experiment: imagine having 2 balloons, one inside the other. Now, blow air into the outer balloon, leaving the inner balloon the same size. The air you push into the volume between the 2 balloons is the anesthetic. The more anesthetic, the farther apart the balloon walls get from each other and the nerves lose contact with each other.

    So, it would follow that if you were to generally increase the amount of fluid in your body, the same thing would happen: the water would enter between the inner and outer cell walls such that the nerves would make less contact than normal.

    Good ole Di-Hydrogen Monoxide!

  117. You're asking the wrong question, Grasshopper by gomel · · Score: 1

    Don't ask why Nature gave human males chest hair.

    Ask why Evolution hasn't taken it from them...

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
    1. Re:You're asking the wrong question, Grasshopper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go by evolution, then if the males look weird it's usually the females fault. If the females look weird then it's the males fault.

      ("Weird" from the perspective of form follows functionality)

      In mild, high energy, high resource environments all sorts of weird animals can survive - primates with long colourful noses that have very little uses.

      Whereas in harsher environments you tend to have more "lean and mean" sort of creatures..

  118. I'm sure the CIA could provide further data by writertype · · Score: 1

    It's a shame that their foreign interrogators don't submit to peer review, however. I'm speaking in terms of publication, of course. Why, what were you thinking of?

  119. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I concur. The more I drink, the less pain I feel! This is news?

  120. Man walks into a doctor's office... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Says: "Doc, I'm feeling hungry all the time"

    The doctor punches him

    Man: "Ouch!! Hey, whatdya do *that* for?!?!

    Doctor: "Not feeling hungry anymore, are ya?"

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  121. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lost weight when I switched to diet sodas. In March of 2002 I completely stopped regular sodas and switched to diet versions... over the next 9 months I lost 40 pounds.

  122. Hic! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I know once i've had a few drinks I usually feel no pain.... Hic!

  123. Miracles of the placebo effect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the neat thing about the placebo effect is how effective it is regardless of whether the person knows it or not. As well it can be a very large effect - as high as 30% in some studies (depending on how much hand-waving is done). This is why modern medicine has such a difficult time producing good statistical results, you have to be able to show a significant difference between new fancy drug and good old sugar pill which still help 30% of people.

    Here's a sugar pill, it has no medicinal value whatsoever, but it helps 30% of people! Try it!

  124. LOLz by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    lollllllllllllllllllllll

    damn that was funny

  125. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    What they haven't yet told you is that "ghelidj" is Arabic for "I'm Not." This is actually Ra's Al Ghul.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  126. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by defile · · Score: 1

    I've heard this one before. You know that defys the laws of physics right? A diet soda is: carbonated water, citric and/or phosphoric acid, flavor and a non-sugar related sweetener. There is nothing there that your body can convert to and store as body fat (or muscle for that matter, though I doubt anyone would complain if that was the case) so unless they are adding chemicals that turn your body photosynthetic and allow you to turn all that CO2 and water into glucose I don't see how this is even remotely possible.

    The argument I've heard/read (can't remember) is that diet sodas trigger cravings for other foods. Kind of subjective. It's basically one step from people willfully eating fattier foods to compensate for all the dieting they're doing since they've switched to diet.

  127. Re:Terry Schaivo, anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No propaganda at all. If she was so "out of it", then why was she responsive to voices and able to move her fingers a bit? Point being, she DID feel pain as she wasn't in 100% PVS, as per the doctor's diagnosis.

    I love how the left says "don't let the facts get in the way" (which is generally irrellevant to the topic at hand, this topic included) and calls everyone who questions them "facists" of one sort or another. If you want name calling, go to the Huffington post. You'll fit right in with that crowd.

  128. Cheers by witte · · Score: 1

    "Thirsty People Feel More Pain"

    Heh, that sounds like something Norm would say to get a free beer from Woody.

  129. Re:Flu and showers Shoe and Flowers... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    (Yeh, Spoonerisms...)

    Well, as a show of the state of my mind, I can't help but say this:

    Don't catch any brain illnesses: you don't want to be achurch of the poisoned mind... (for some reason I was thinking of Culture Club when I saw your response....)

    (A few more spoonerisms to try out:

    A Tale of Two Cities

    More Tales of the Cities

    Rules and Guides

    Take the Shot

    Five Hissing Moores

    A Sandwich with Turkey Meat

    Take a/Your Shower (and if you're male and endowed... you can...)

    )

    HAVE FUN!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  130. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But didn't Al Ghul invent the Internet?

  131. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    LMAO! This is the funniest damn thing I've read all week.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  132. My experience confirms this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have bad wrist pain, and my experience confirms what he says. every time I get a drink of water, or pass water, my wrists feel better.

    I suspect it has something to do with the salt balance in the body, because eating salty foods hurts my wrists. (also, drinking and passing water will deplete your body of salt.)

  133. Re:Dehydration and pain - link known for nearly 30 by Mike570 · · Score: 1
    Particularly compelling in that book is Dr Batmanghelidj's thorough scientific explanation on how 'diet' sodas actually substantially contribute to weight gain.

    Come on! Don't ruin diet soda on me too!

  134. Plantsex by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    Myself, no. But I hear that's a pretty popular thing in some circles, :-).