Why the f*ck does every half-brained ass think that the cost of anything is directly proportional to the cost of gasoline. If the gas price goes up 300%, and if the cost of an item goes up 300%, it means even the profit that the seller makes has gone up 300% (assuming that even the cost of all the raw materials and wages and evrything has gone up 300%). Is it not? Or does these dim-witted asses need much further explanation.
Can't these fsking editors who approve about 30 stories a day at least read the front page of their own site before pushing a story through. Most of us are here to see some very differing view points and opinions on different stories that interest us. When these ass*oles keep on pushing the same story over and over and over it just irritates some of us. But hey before you say it's their site they can take their ball and go home if they want to it is owned by some public company. So maybe they can't take the ball and go home without getting the board of directors permission, but they can run the site to ground if they are upset at the board for treating them like piece of sh*t they have turned out to be.
If it is opt-in is it not same as subscribing to an RSS feed or a mailing list and getting updates as they happen.
The utopia everyone has been looking for - efficient server side push of data to the user without the user having to poll the servers every minute to see if ther's an update at WSJ or Slashdot or any other site supporting an AIM bot?
Why is it surprising that a for-profit corporation would do something to raise their bottom line? If they behave ethically do you think that it will make them multi billionaires overnight? Don't tell me Google yet. They are still just in the start phase. Give them couple more years.
How do these fscking moderators choose one comment that says that the post is Dupe as Informative +5 out of the 100 posts that say that the story is dupe?
[Me too]This story is a Dupe[/Me Too]
Slashdot Mirror
Surely you believe in intelligent design theory too.
Why the f*ck does every half-brained ass think that the cost of anything is directly proportional to the cost of gasoline. If the gas price goes up 300%, and if the cost of an item goes up 300%, it means even the profit that the seller makes has gone up 300% (assuming that even the cost of all the raw materials and wages and evrything has gone up 300%). Is it not? Or does these dim-witted asses need much further explanation.
Can't these fsking editors who approve about 30 stories a day at least read the front page of their own site before pushing a story through. Most of us are here to see some very differing view points and opinions on different stories that interest us. When these ass*oles keep on pushing the same story over and over and over it just irritates some of us. But hey before you say it's their site they can take their ball and go home if they want to it is owned by some public company. So maybe they can't take the ball and go home without getting the board of directors permission, but they can run the site to ground if they are upset at the board for treating them like piece of sh*t they have turned out to be.
The utopia everyone has been looking for - efficient server side push of data to the user without the user having to poll the servers every minute to see if ther's an update at WSJ or Slashdot or any other site supporting an AIM bot?
Why is it surprising that a for-profit corporation would do something to raise their bottom line? If they behave ethically do you think that it will make them multi billionaires overnight? Don't tell me Google yet. They are still just in the start phase. Give them couple more years.
How do these fscking moderators choose one comment that says that the post is Dupe as Informative +5 out of the 100 posts that say that the story is dupe? [Me too]This story is a Dupe[/Me Too]