Slashdot Mirror


Baltimore to Test Cell Phone Traffic Monitoring

Momoru writes "The Baltimore Sun is reporting that a Canadian company, Delcan NET, will begin testing a technology that determines the flow of automobile traffic by monitoring cell phone traffic. The company promises a revolutionary way to determine backups, but privacy advocates fear the implications of a third party tracking users by their cell phones."

131 comments

  1. First TRIPLICATE!!! by RKBA · · Score: 5, Informative

    *Ahem*

    TRIPLICATE!!!

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/19/07 45248&tid=126&tid=215&tid=158

    Note: Yes, I reported this a few minutes ago.

    1. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      *Ahem*

      TRIPLICATE!!!

      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/19/07 45248&tid=126&tid=215&tid=158

      Note: Yes, I reported this a few minutes ago


      A Trupe?

    2. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And Digg only managed to post this once.

      The sound you hear is the sound of advertisers running from Slashdot to Digg.

    3. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      TRIPLICATE!!!

      Fine, there is a first for everything. Its clear that the slashdot editors either don't know their own site, they don't know how to use google, don't have a working search function for their website, or just don't care, or just like negative attention. I don't know. This is easy to avoid, and it keeps happening. Beyond my knowledge, they prefer it that way. So HA! They got what they wanted.

      Anyway, regarding this triplicate story, why is using cell phones that are only a subset of the real traffic any better than using an old fashion direct measurement system like those rubber weight activated car counters, or video cameras, or hiring some guy to sit there and count the cars?

      I see no added benefit of using cell phones being that it is by definition a poor metric of traffic. So, what are they really monitoring or measuring here?

    4. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I think we all should post only things about duplicating articles on slashdot in this story and nothing else. Maybe, just maybe the "editors" will get a hint. Though I use the phrase as loosely as possible.

      --
      I don't get it.
    5. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by xouumalperxe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, since "duplicate" boils into "dupe", I'd have to say that short for triplicate would be "tripe".

    6. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by ff1324 · · Score: 4, Funny

      RIGHT HAND: Hi there, left hand how are you?
      LEFT HAND: Oh, hello there, what's your name?
      RIGHT HAND: My name is Right Hand. What are you doing?
      LEFT HAND: I'm making Cell Phone Traffic Tracking Articles. Are doing something, too?
      RIGHT HAND: Well, yes I am. I'm making Cell Phone Traffic Tracking Articles, too. I sure wish I knew what you were up to.
      THIRD HAND: Hi guys, I'm bushed...I've been making Cell Phone Traffic Tracking Articles since dawn.
      LEFT HAND: Well, it's another day of working for Slashdot. Let's get back to work.

    7. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by someone300 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... there are also two other similar articles

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/30/124324 7&mode=thread&tid=126
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/13/042822 9&mode=thread&tid=100

      Maybe there'll be a post for every single country/state that uses cellphone traffic to monitor roads. It'll end up like the monthly firefox userbase reports.

    8. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Let me be the first to put this in an elegant six-article list:

    9. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digg is for bloggers and homos.

    10. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by jessecurry · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just set up a system that monitors traffic density? They could pretty easily, and probably pretty cheaply monitor how much metal is on each stretch of roadway, it think that would be much more effective than the amount of cell phone traffic.
      What if there is some really interesting piece of news? Then a huge number of cell phones would be active. Or what if it's raining, then people might tend to stay off of their phones. I really don't see a direct correlation between cell phone usage and traffic.

      --
      Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    11. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and blacks

    13. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1
      This is fortunate as I moderated in the last discussion of this and I don't want to rob the person I modded up!

      In the UK we're still able to purchase mobiles without telling the network any personal information. As such I'm finding it hard to get excited about the potential for abuse or invasion of privacy. Lets face it, who would use cell phone records to trap serious criminals when they are likely to either:

      • Buy an anonymous SIM
      • Turn the f**king thing off when you're doing something wrong
      • You've murdered someone and you're too stupidto do either of the above

      Go ahead, track that data until the cows come home. Just don't make it illegal to switch it off or get a bad signal :-)
    14. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Traffic Monitoring Cell Phones will be it's own catagory soon. My question would be science or politics.

    15. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      RIGHT HAND: Hey, third hand isn't a hand at all!
      LEFT HAND: *shudder*

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    16. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

      Here's why cell-phones are being considered: they can see how long it takes one particular car (well, cell phone) to get from one place to another. Video cameras can do this, but only if they read the number plate (which is being done in Australia for trucks, and the UK for all vehicles). Car counters can only work out localised traffic info. Electronic tolling systems which use an e-tag or similar perform these kinds of calculations whenever cars go through toll points, but in the absence of such a system, and not wanting to install expensive number-plate reading tech, jumping on the back of cell phones is quite clever.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
  2. WAKE UP MORONS by Beatlebum · · Score: 1, Insightful

    DUPE DUPE DUPE

    1. Re:WAKE UP MORONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nancy Reagan said it best:

      Just say no!

    2. Re:WAKE UP MORONS by HugePedlar · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the quote at the bottom of the page seems uncannily relevant :

      "If you had better tools, you could more effectively demonstrate your total incompetence."

      --
      Argh.
    3. Re:WAKE UP MORONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And mine was

      If two wrongs don't make a right, try three. -- Laurence J. Peter

  3. Dupe by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your kidding, right? You must be.... Please tell me your kidding....
    OMFG, I think he's serious....

    --
    For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    1. Re:Dupe by carguy84 · · Score: 1

      APRIL FOOLS!!!!!!!!

  4. duplicate on the front page. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Do the editors even check? Are they even working?


    Two same stories with the same links on the front page.

    1. Re:duplicate on the front page. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      This isn't that hard to avoid. Yeah, they post to the in-queue along with a time for the story to be uploaded. But what would be so hard for each of them to take 1 day a week to be the guy who has to handle the queue and give the final ok for the upload to actually get posted?

      They keep on like this, they'll have to switch to PostNuke or something ...

    2. Re:duplicate on the front page. by gatzke · · Score: 1


      Seems like we have had dupes back-to-back or nearly so, maybe one article between.

      You would think they would have two people sign off on stories unless it was very time sensitive.

      I don't feel cheated since I don't pay, but advertisers and paying members might be pissed.

      This also makes me want to take any legitimate story and submit it over and over, just to see if I could get a dupe story in. Maybe people are doing that, and that is one reason we still get dupes.

    3. Re:duplicate on the front page. by alexandreracine · · Score: 0

      I think that the "press the button" monkey is back.

      --
      No sig for now.
  5. wake up editor morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    try reading your own site, it might suck less balls then.

    a triplicate is a fucking joke, go fire yourself

  6. What? by lewiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is amazing. Normally I'd just ignore a duplicate (or triplicate by the looks of it) but I'm amazed it can happen with just one article sandwiched in between.
    Bizarre.

    1. Re:What? by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This was posted by CowboyNeal, though, while the last article was posted by Zonk. Surely you don't expect the editors to actually read Slashdot instead of mechanically clicking on "Publish"?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:What? by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Did +you+ think CowboyNeal would turn down a sandwich?

    3. Re:What? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      I'm now waiting for back-to-back...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    4. Re:What? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Dunno, but he must be pretty important. He doesn't answer email while Taco does.

  7. You've got it all wrong... by Ramses0 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...they were all trying for First Post.

    --Robert

  8. Wow by SunPin · · Score: 1

    Is every other story today going to be about mobile phone tracking?

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  9. Good god, another? by drgath159 · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Good god, another? by garcia · · Score: 1

      Posting comments about duplicates from 2002? That's just not fair! If it's not two stories posted right in a row it doesn't count.

  10. I'm going to give Taco the benefit of the doubt. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

    I'm going to guess he's being funny and chuckle accordingly.

  11. Cause by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what's causing all these dupes?

    Hyperthreading.

    1. Re:Cause by scubacuda · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, it's obviously affecting the editors' performance.

    2. Re:Cause by JustOK · · Score: 1

      I thought it was teflon. Or Bush...

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Cause by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      But, if they turn off the HT, the dupe could have arrived even faster than what appears to be a record 165 minutes.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    4. Re:Cause by FFON · · Score: 0

      good show my man.

      funniest comment EVAR

      --
      .cig
    5. Re:Cause by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they are all talking on their cell phones at the same time they are publishing articles.

  12. SLASHDOT SUCKS BIG HAIRY DONKEY BALLS by Beatlebum · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thank you.

  13. Jeebus Freggin' Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Need I say more? This is pathetic... A pair of trained monkeys could do a better job as /. editors than the current crew.

  14. Deja Vu? by tekmiester · · Score: 1

    Cowboy Neal and Zonk... do you guys talk?

  15. hmmm.... by Malor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, this IS pretty important. Maybe they'll post it once per affected phone.

  16. Karma whore potential by dada21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make sure you go and copy all the +5 comments into this thread, get your Karma up to 'Excellent'

    1. Re:Karma whore potential by Kohath · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Here's a link to one of them. What do I get for that?

    2. Re:Karma whore potential by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Why, -1, Redundant, of course! ;-)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  17. Who What Why? by ill+dillettante · · Score: 1

    Good to see CoyboyNeal bring up the rear again.

  18. SLASHDOT TO TEST DUPE MONITORING by krbvroc1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot unveiled a program to detect article dupes. A Slashdot spokesman, Mr. C. Taco, said "Our dupe detection system has been running for over a year without a dupe".
    We will soon begin fullscale deployment of a system in YRO that will mine posting data to determine whether an article is a dupe. As long as a user's computer is turned on, the slashdot network notes the time of articles from user to user to calculate the location and speed of posting. Researchers say the program will reduce dupes by quickly rejecting articles. The company says they will not track the articles of individual posters. However, a staff attorney for the XYZ says that tracking might violate federal law and 'increases the chances that information will be used for more invasive purposes in the future.'

  19. AJAX? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

    Does this use AJAX?

  20. Dear Cowboy Neal by RealBeanDip · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is this awesome site called Slashdot, http://slashdot.org/ - I think you'll like it. Check it out sometime before posting news to your site.

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

    1. Re:Dear Cowboy Neal by Atario · · Score: 1

      There is this awesome site called Slashdot, http://slashdot.org/ [slashdot.org] - I think you'll like it. Check it out sometime before posting news to your site.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  21. For something Completey New... by craznar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is a dup article.

    I know that no-one knows this yet, and that my extensive research shows that I am the first to post this tit-bit.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  22. Very impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all I can say to this.

  23. Paid Advertising? by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 1

    Did Declan pay someone at Slashdot!!!! Only a one article gap now!

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  24. MOD PARENT INTERESTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please.

  25. I'd put up an on-topic post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it would be modded down. Apparently, there is no known topic to this thread.

    Hey - wait a minute!

    I see how this works!

    #1. I don't want to be tracked by the gummint
    #2. I shut my phone off so it can't BE tracked
    #3. The cell phone company can't place calls to me, and my bill goes down
    #4. Profit!

    Um... are the cell phone execs REALLY this stupid? It seems like they might be.
    If they are, their shareholders will fire them.

    No worries. They can just get jobs as /. editors!

  26. The fortune cookie reads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you had better tools, you could more effectively demonstrate your total incompetence.
    I can only imagine what types of godly tools the editors have for being this incompetent.

  27. Bonk...Bonk...Bonk by Winlin · · Score: 1

    Me, slowly banging my head off the monitor. Now can we just go ahead and do a two story in a row dupe and end the suspense?

  28. Your all -1 offtopic by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3 dupes - so fucking what. You're not paying for it. You ought to be bitching about the article registration like usual.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Your all -1 offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a sucbscriber, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Your all -1 offtopic by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Three dupes? Try SIX. SIX DUPES.

      At what point do you ask the question, why don't the editors read their own site?

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  29. I submitted this with a funnier headline... by sparkes · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but it doesn't matter it'll be posted sometime today ;-)

    --
    grab some geek gear at http://nerd.ws

  30. The Slashdot Sun is reporting by Admiral+Justin · · Score: 1

    Slashdot will now track congestion by in an attempt to streamline the service. They will do this by tracking your progress from dupe to dupe, analyzing server load, and your favorite brand of alcohol.

    --
    You will be baked, and there will be cake.
  31. Dupey McDuperson by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    After these shenanigans, the current poll will probably be the last time I ever vote for Cowboy Neal...

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  32. It's THAT Important by SenorPez · · Score: 0

    At least even those of us with ADD will know about this story.

  33. In other news... by shoolz · · Score: 1

    I just read a really awesome article that is *totally unrelated* to this /. post... apparently cell phones can be used to monitor traffic flow! Did anybody else know about this?

  34. mnb Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyway, regarding this triplicate story, why is using cell phones that are only a subset of the real traffic any better than using an old fashion direct measurement system like those rubber weight activated car counters, or video cameras, or hiring some guy to sit there and count the cars?


    FWIW, often the people doing manual traffic counts only do so to calibrate the Axel Ratio for a given strech of road, then they let the pnumatic sensors do the bulk of the count.

    But, regardless, those methods are all fine for modeling typical traffic loads, but don't deliver the real-time data that the phone method promises.
  35. CowboyNeal... by GoombaJones · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..are you a script? Maybe he is and they're just conducting some sort of a Turing Test... Oh, and "mumble" was the word I had to type in to pass _my_ Turing Test as AC. How appropriate.:)

  36. Slashdot had to remove the automated dupe-detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out Microsoft has a patent on it :(.

  37. What?-"/." Outsourcing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect they all aren't even in the same room. The downside of outsourcing comes to Slashdot.

    1. Re:What?-"/." Outsourcing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They coul ahve just fucking checked their own front page... Slashdot editors - dumbest geeks EVER.

  38. NEXT ARTICLE... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    The next Slashdot story about Baltimore Testing Cell Phone Traffic will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!

    http://slashdot.org/subscribe.pl

  39. Deja Vu by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Funny

    It happens when they change something.

    ---

    Thus it is now a fact that the Matrix has us and Cmdr. Taco is the Agent.

  40. Yea dude by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yea dude, I heard about it on digg.com first.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  41. Suggestion by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly, maybe some things are worth being discussed 2-3-4-5 times, so how about introducing a new feature on /. - a pinned story? A story like that would just stay pinned on the front page for a while, and the newer articles would scroll below it.

  42. First ... threadslapping ... now ARTICLESLAPPING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At risk to Karma*, I am posting in an article that, interestingly enough, may be the first to be ARTICLESLAPPED or modded -1 redund@nt. (Here is a link to the article about the Slashdot threadslapping phenomenon)

    *It is my understanding from looking at slashcode that mod points assigned to anoymous postings affect your Karma as much as regular postings.

  43. SlashDot to get technology to avoid article DUPing by Bodysurf · · Score: 1

    Zonk and CowboyNeal are beta-testing techology that combines cellphones, instant messages and email to avoid SlashDot article duplications. The results will be published a couple times on Slashdot in the not-to-distant future.

  44. you know what the bitch of it is, too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some mods karma burn you for "lifting" from previous slashdot articles on the same subject... ...(clicks anon)

  45. An open letter to the Managment... by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey, Editors!

    I love this site, I love the discussions that the comments generate and I enjoy this community being one of the places (other than IRC) where technically-minded people can come together - hell, even some of the trolls are pretty damn funny, and I'm not usually one to join in the crowd of people screaming 'Dupe!' every time you repost an article from the previous week or day - I don't always get a chance to check /. everyday and so if something gets reposted I often haven't noticed the original and still enjoy reading it, and I don't see why dupes attract so much of the screaming masses to deride you.

    However, two on the front page, with only one article seperating them, no less, is utterly rediculous - that'd be like the TV news reporting on the same thing, with the same content, but with a different correspondant - it's not professional, and it'd be pretty poor even for an amateur setup - an analogy would be it's OK for the same announcement to be on two days in a row, but two in the same bulletin is sloppy and unprofessional. It's even below the standard of your average LiveJournal blogger, and it's certainly put a doubt in my mind over my decision to treat myself to a /. subscription for Christmas - while this isn't quite 'you lost yourself a customer', those few beers I'd buy instead of a subscription are now looking that much more tempting...

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    1. Re:An open letter to the Managment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is spelled "ridiculous".

    2. Re:An open letter to the Managment... by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      Good post. I mean, I can fully understand a dupe every once in a while. It happens. But for the love of all that is holy, maybe at least scan the frigging front page and see if there's one already posted first? Not to mention this story has been posted a total of 4, yes, 4 times now. A dupe I can see. A triplicate is even possible on rare occasions. But 4?!?

      Also, I could see it if the two articles were posted within minutes of each other by different editors. Although the subscriber base would likely catch it in the mysterious future and it'd probably be corrected. But, these are 3 hours apart. The first would have clearly been visible on the front page when the second was posted.

      I have no idea why I bitch about it, other than to mock them, which, as KMFDM said, is much more effecitve than getting pissed off. Not that it'll make them do anything to fix it, but it makes me feel better. :)

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
    3. Re:An open letter to the Managment... by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      Heh. My sig has a new answer!

      WWJD?
      JWRHOSBP!

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
  46. Is this a record? by daffmeister · · Score: 1

    Just one intervening post? Have the editors ever done better than this?

    Congratulations CowboyNeal. Slashdotters everywhere salute you.

  47. GOOGLE NEWS GETS SLASH DUPED! by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone want to guess what the top two Google news hits for Cell Traffic are at the moment?

    Results 1 - 10 of about 2,810 for cell traffic. (0.16 seconds)

    Cell Phones to Monitor Traffic Flow
    Slashdot - 3 hours ago
    determine traffic conditions such as jams and slowdowns. As long as a user's phone is turned on, the cellphone network notes the time of handoffs from cell to
    Cell phone data tracing traffic in Md. Baltimore Sun
    all 3 related

    Baltimore to Test Cell Phone Traffic Monitoring
    Slashdot - 1 hour ago
    reporting that a Canadian company, Delcan NET, will begin testing a technology that determines the flow of automobile traffic by monitoring cell phone traffic.


    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  48. One word. by pwnage · · Score: 1

    WOW!

    --
    Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
  49. Voluntary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything that requires voluntary power to your cell phone is a waste of taxpayer money. If disproportionate number of people power their cell phones off, your traffic monitoring doesn't work properly. Whats the use of having something that is accurate only when everyone plays nice....thats just a waste of money.

    1. Re:Voluntary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So after the previous 2 articles, you suddenly have something new to say?

      you should have stuck with ripping on the /. editors like everyone else.

    2. Re:Voluntary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If disproportionate number of people power their cell phones off, your traffic monitoring doesn't work properly.

      Huh? You monitor how long it takes a cell phone to get from A to B. What on earth does that have to do with how many cell phones are on the road?

  50. And Now For Something Completely Different by PonyHome · · Score: 1

    Baltimore is testing the use of cell phones to monitor traffic flow!

    1. Re:And Now For Something Completely Different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but they're apparently going to start using cell phones in Baltimore to monitor traffic flow.

    2. Re:And Now For Something Completely Different by Kredal · · Score: 1

      I heard that they're going to be monitoring Baltimore's traffic flow by using cell phones!

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    3. Re:And Now For Something Completely Different by xTown · · Score: 1

      That's pretty amazing--did you hear that they're doing that in Baltimore, too?

  51. And Now For Something Completely Different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baltimmore is testing the use of cell phones...

    "We've already done that!"

  52. CowboyNeal's morning by nbahi15 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know maybe CowboyNeal just sat down with bagel and coffee, and wanted to feel productive before doing some amazon.com christmas shopping. So he sees a nifty article on cell phone traffic monitoring, and says hey this is a good article let's post it. But oh wait?! I should check for dupes.


    DING-DONG!


    Must be UPS or FedEx. COMING! Wow my shipment of shirts from ThinkGeek are here. Tears open box. Decides to try on the shirt.


    Then suddenly the cat strolls in and decides to step on the mouse. Accidentally submitting the duplicate post. So really we should blame the cat.

  53. Look, folks by mrscott · · Score: 1

    Slashdot doesn't cost you a damn thing. I see this every time there's a dupe. People bitching about how much Slashdot sucks. If you don't like it, leave. It's really very, very simple.

    1. Re:Look, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except if you know, you pay to surcribe. Fucking tard. now go play with traffic you obviously worthless meat sack.

      See, I can be a karma whoring troll too!

      ps. why do i always get mailbox for my word?

    2. Re:Look, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... packs bags and heads over to www.digg.com

    3. Re:Look, folks by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot doesn't cost you a damn thing.

      Unless you subscribe.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    4. Re:Look, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People bitching about how much Slashdot sucks. If you don't like people bitching about it, leave. It's really very, very simple.

    5. Re:Look, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People bitching about people bitching about how much Slashdot sucks suck. If you don't like people bitching about people bitching about it, leave. It's really very, very, very simple.

    6. Re:Look, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People bitching about people bitching about people bitching about how much Slashdot sucks suck. If you don't like people bitching about people bitching about people bitching about it, leave. It's really very, very, very, very simple.

    7. Re:Look, folks by Kymermosst · · Score: 0, Redundant

      People bitching about people bitching about people bitching about people bitching about how much Slashdot sucks suck. If you don't like people bitching about people bitching about people bitching about people bitching about it, leave. It's really very, very, very, very, very simple.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    8. Re:Look, folks by Kohath · · Score: 1

      now go play with traffic you obviously worthless meat sack.

      But how would I find traffic? Have you heard of any new ways traffic can be monitored?

  54. I have to give you kudos... by mrscott · · Score: 1

    You picked an appropriate name.

  55. Baltimore to Test Cell Phone Traffic Monitoring by CaptainChuck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This system almost certainly measures the aggregate amount of cellular trafic and would not identify individual users, much less tap into their conversations. Except for Democrats snooping on Republicans, which was legal according to the President.

  56. Funny, that. by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever wonder why I don't pay for it?

    When I see something worth paying for, I'll pay. Until then, they can whistle for my subscription money (and my ad revenue - blocked those too).

  57. Read the front page by user102 · · Score: 0

    Can't these fsking editors who approve about 30 stories a day at least read the front page of their own site before pushing a story through. Most of us are here to see some very differing view points and opinions on different stories that interest us. When these ass*oles keep on pushing the same story over and over and over it just irritates some of us. But hey before you say it's their site they can take their ball and go home if they want to it is owned by some public company. So maybe they can't take the ball and go home without getting the board of directors permission, but they can run the site to ground if they are upset at the board for treating them like piece of sh*t they have turned out to be.

  58. Even more weird... by rockwood · · Score: 1

    What's more weird is that the need for new articles causes dupe's. trip's and quad's, but yet I submitted an article for posting and it's in pending... sure no big deal.. but look at the pending status
    04:50 PM -- Wednesday July 06 2005 Pending

    I posted 4 months and 13 days ago!

    I think it's been hyperthreaded into hyperspace. OH... and I've checked.. my submission is not a dupe! Go figure!

    --
    Never try to beat a professional at his own game!
    1. Re:Even more weird... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Lesson: submit it again. And again.

  59. Woah! by numbware · · Score: 2, Funny
    I heard they were doing the same thing in Baltimore just a while ago.

    Oh wait...

    --
    I'm going to go create my own technology news site, with blackjack and hookers. You know what? Forget the news site.
    1. Re:Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I read an article that said they use cell phones for this in a large East Coast city.

  60. Technical Difficulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, see, there was a problem with the Hyperthreaded P4 on the Slashdot server and this article got split into two, maybe three-four threads there, but it was so slow due to the problem with hyperthreading on powerful servers that when the first one popped out, they thought it was all done and went for a sandwich and so you can imagine their surprise when you notice it was posted like 4 times, including in the distant past.

    So, like, cool down, K? You're just jealous 'cause of that C3 you're still running.

  61. No need for the this by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

    Here is a hint: The Baltimore betway backs up between I-95 and I-70 every fricken weekday. No one needs cell phone technology to figure that out! As for the DC beltway, I think it could be 16 lanes in both directions and it would still take forever to go from Beltsville to Gaithersburg! Sometimes I think an accident can cause a rubber neck delay that goes all the way to Virginia and then back up in both directions!

  62. 19 November 2005 by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    Slashdot jumps the shark

  63. slashcode should work for the editors too by BashDot · · Score: 1

    Slow down cowboy!

    Slashdot requires you two wait 24 hours before posting a previous story!

  64. CalTrans (california) is already doing this. by natrik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CalTrans already has a very complicated, however effective, publicly viewable system which, if you read their main page lists "motorist cellular calls" as one of the many sources of information. I was alerted to this site by a vigilant friend concerned about his motorist calls made in and north of L.A. and there may have been some outbursts against this policy, but I know of none.

    If you have a secret to tell, meet in person, and whisper. --Tom Clancy

    Jeez!

  65. YAY! Now there will be no excuse! by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    Fantastic, now there will be no excuse for several state vehicles to travel side by side at well below the speed limit, obstructing faster traffic as they move up and down 95. Someone watching the cell-info screens in relation to traffic will have no problem contacting the five drivers driving side by side to move the f*** out of the way so decent citizens can get to work on time, and they can stop preventing proper traffic flow!

    One thing the article said that was very interesting was the ability to get cell phone users information about traffic. Are they considering calling a driver's cell phone because they're driving too slow? Wow, wouldn't that be great. If you know who they are Balitmore, you should have no trouble providing the proper encouragement to get someone to follow the law, whatever that may be, just call their phone.

    Oh wait...one more thing... I know this system will track people when they're not even trying to use their phones, but...if a law passes that restricts drivers from using their phones without a hands-free, can we take this a step farther than force phones to identify drivers not using hands-free technology? That would be great!

    Finally there will be no excuse.

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  66. dejavu all over again by Thecarpe · · Score: 1

    nothing to see here - just the obligatory redundant announcement of a redundant article amidst a sea of redundant "ah-ha, I caught you" posts...all over again.

  67. Dang by spx · · Score: 1

    Now Im gonna have to obey the speed limit and stuff in my homestate :) Seriously, I wish they could come up with something with all the police/etc people that use cell phones while on the job, they drive the worst!

  68. Holy crap! by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

    That's hilarious. Isn't a moderator based system supposed to alleviate these problems? Do the mods even read /.??

    --
    I am Spartacus