Slashdot Mirror


AIM Bots: Useful or Spam?

An anonymous reader writes "Imagine my surprise this morning when AOL AIM popped up a window and introduced me to two bots that it automatically added to my buddy list. " Two seperate issues- one is simply auto adding robots to your friends list, which is very uncool. The second is a corporation using bots in an official capacity. This is an interesting trend, although technically speaking, not that far from the eggdrop of old.

517 comments

  1. Meh. by Fraize · · Score: 4, Informative

    Right-click, Delete Group. Done.

    --
    --Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:Meh. by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 1

      Amen. Those bots did not last more than 5 seconds.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
    2. Re:Meh. by Iriel · · Score: 1

      AIM bot's daily schedule:
      - for(i=0;ibuddies.length;i++){
      - if(!shadylookinggroup){buddy[i].list.add(shadylook inggroup);}
      - get beer;}

      You don't see this coming? I do.

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    3. Re:Meh. by am+2k · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Right-click, Delete Group. Done.

      Well, until they get added quicker than you can delete them (would 50 per second do?). Reminds me of some other well-known message-based protocol system.

    4. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      $sys$robot?

    5. Re:Meh. by nkh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The true question is: why did my IM client forgot to ask me about those new contacts? I would have denied those bots in the click of my mouse...

    6. Re:Meh. by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      hehe...forget... hehe..

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    7. Re:Meh. by euthymius · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And I am using Trillian not AIM (assuming that with their own client they were allowed to do tricks like this). But, I was only for a second surprised to see them there. Next second they were in the bit bucket ;)

    8. Re:Meh. by Slackdog · · Score: 1

      i've blocked it, and deleted. :P

    9. Re:Meh. by Descalzo · · Score: 1
      It's funny. I don't know what you're talking about. Did I miss something? Has this not been implemented yet?

      I ask because I have seen nothing on AIM on my PC, although the AIM client built in to iChat hasn't worked for me for about a week. Coincidence?

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    10. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the question is why are you using AIM in the first place? Ever heard of Gaim, Miranda, Kopete etc.?

    11. Re:Meh. by Khopesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not done.
      Delete the group and close your IM client.
      Now open it again and log back in. AOL messages you wondering why you deleted its bots, though they are not put back.
      Now you're done. Damnit.

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    12. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Gaim (on linux). This still popped up this morning. Right-click. Delete Group. Done.

    13. Re:Meh. by Sharth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because your client is intelligent in thinking that maybe you logon to aim from somewhere else (perhaps work?) and that you might have added people there. So, being the smart program that it is, since AOL says that these people are in your buddy list it adds them.

      This is far more a problem of aol screwing around with people's buddy lists and adding a group and 2 buddys to everyone's list.

    14. Re:Meh. by sootman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm surprised that there's only a few comments so far and most of them say "Eh, just delete them." Isn't that what spammers say we should do about spam? "Eh, if you don't like it, just delete it." Yeah. Great idea. I don't get enough exercise deleting spams and configuring filters all day long, now I get to do it with my buddy list too. Fucking beautiful.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    15. Re:Meh. by gid · · Score: 1

      I'm using gaim 1.5.0 on XP, I see nothing.

    16. Re:Meh. by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      Why not stop bitching about it and use something better

    17. Re:Meh. by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      Try reloading GAIM then. They should appear.

    18. Re:Meh. by cheesygrapes · · Score: 1

      Adium added them to my "AIM bot" list rather than my budy list.

    19. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spam comes back no matter how many times you delete it. These only have to be deleted once.

    20. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using Gaim as well. I deleted them as soon as I saw them.

    21. Re:Meh. by Kitsuneymg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just did this. I then closed and opened gaim again. No new messages. Although the confirmation IM is f*cking annoying.

      captcha:maskable
      heh

    22. Re:Meh. by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      I figure that AOL can add whatever they want to my list (even though I really don't like it). But when I intentionally delete one of their bots, do they really have to message me to tell me that I deleted one of their bots?

    23. Re:Meh. by fbartho · · Score: 1

      I'm using trillian, and I don't have the bots either...

      Nor did I get the AOL IM about them...

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    24. Re:Meh. by Buran · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. The point is that you ask permission first. Respect peoples' property (and their computers and software ARE their property). All you have to do is send the system message with "If you would like to use these services reply with (blah), thank you for reading".

      Lack of respect is what bothers me.

    25. Re:Meh. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      I'm using trillian as well. As soon as I connected to AIM today the bots were added. I deleted them a few seconds later. Try closing trilian and opening it again, they might get added.

    26. Re:Meh. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      AOL is letting me use their servers to connect to others to chat with. I'm using their resource for free, so yeah, I think they get a little more leeway than a spammer. Spammers tend to only use others resources. Spammers don't usually host email servers for the public for free. Totally different situation.

    27. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm using gaim 1.5.0 on XP, I see nothing."

      I'm the AC you're replying to...

      I just went into Gaim > Tools > Privacy and set it to 'Allow only the users in my Buddy List'. For some reason I had not changed this from 'Allow all users to contact me'. Maybe that's the difference between your config and mine?

      I dunno how this stuff works under the hood so just guessing here...
      --

    28. Re:Meh. by ameoba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the difference between hitchiking & not liking what they have on the radio and somebody sneaking into your house in the middle of the night with a boom box blasting intentionally obnoxious music.

      Even if you couldn't delete them, it's not that big of a deal having 2 extra entries on a buddy list. Maybe if they routinely sent me messages, I'd have a problem but, for now, it's nothing.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    29. Re:Meh. by bitspotter · · Score: 1

      spammers don't host servers because no one would use them. servers don't spam because they don't want to catch spammer syndrome, which is characterized by a sudden lack of users.

      It's one thing to be an honest spammer, it's another to abuse hard-earned trust of your userbase, especially when some of them have become dependent on the spam-free experience YOU have lulled them into coming to expect.

    30. Re:Meh. by ZiakII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. And I am using Trillian not AIM (assuming that with their own client they were allowed to do tricks like this). But, I was only for a second surprised to see them there. Next second they were in the bit bucket ;)

      My guess is that they added it strait to the server buddy list, buddy lists for AIM are stored on their server, which they have control of they probably just added it to that list. I'm willing to bet there software doesn't have some backdoor (this isn't Sony) allowing them to add buddy lists from your software, when they have a much easier way of doing it.

    31. Re:Meh. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      What? I can't see anything in your post.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    32. Re:Meh. by accessdeniednsp · · Score: 1

      Use a client that has privacy options
      Gaim and don't forget to get the encrypt plug-in. Both work on Windows and unix variants. Gaim can be persuaded to work on OS X but the encrypt plugin is a different beast in that regard (would need more persuasion).

    33. Re:Meh. by Nykon · · Score: 1

      easy. It was added server side.

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    34. Re:Meh. by Nykon · · Score: 1

      They didn't do anything to YOUR computer or software. They added new group onto the buddy list stored on THEIR server. All your software does it read information from THEIR server and display it. They did nothing to YOUR property.

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    35. Re:Meh. by solarium_rider · · Score: 1

      Good idea, don't want to get kicked by punkbuster for having aimbots.

      --
      -- How many sigs are as useless as this one?
    36. Re:Meh. by gid · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I should have figured as much, forgot I already I had gaim running this morning.

      Damn the bots use small fonts, I need a magnifying glass to see their text.

    37. Re:Meh. by Buran · · Score: 1

      Ah - but it is my software that interacts with the list, and changing that list makes my software do something I did not request it to (and whoever typed the commands to make the changes knew that full well), which equates to screwing with the user's software. That's a line that many people don't want crossed, me included, and there's a difference between legally wrong and ethically wrong. I'm not sure yet on the legally wrong, but I KNOW this is ethically wrong to a lot of people, and I am one of them.

      You don't have to object to it if you don't want to, but I object, and I will continue objecting, and you will just have to deal with it, because interacting with other people means that at some point they will disagree with you. I disagree on this, very strongly.

    38. Re:Meh. by Woldry · · Score: 1

      Wait, the AIMbot is going to get me beer? Damn ... why did I delete it? Why? WHY?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    39. Re:Meh. by sqlrob · · Score: 1
      Looks like the beginnings of that. I deleted the group, and got the following message my next login:

      (18:06:10) AOL System Msg: The group, aim bots, has been deleted from your buddy list. This group contained bots, screen names that provide automated responses. To find out more about bots, go to http://aimtoday.aol.com/aimbots
    40. Re:Meh. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > I disagree on this, very strongly.

      Uhh, then don't use their service. Did anyone seriously expect AOL to provide a free service for the convenience of everyone with no benefit to themselves?

      > which equates to screwing with the user's software

      I have nothing to say to this other than that your argument is shit. AOL owns the servers, they can do whatever the hell they want. That's why it's "AOL Instant Messenger" and not "Buran Instant Messenger". Your client didn't do anything weird -- it fetched the list of contacts and displayed them.

      Let me guess -- you clicking here is me "screwing with" your web browser?

      --
      My other car is first.
    41. Re:Meh. by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations user! The new AOstaLkerbot has been added to your buddy list. Please ignore this bot while it watches you and takes notes on your personal life. Expect to find some new and exciting bots coming from AOL soon!

    42. Re:Meh. by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      spam-free experience

      Blinking and flashing ads in the buddy list window doesn't strike me as being "spam-free," but then I consider all ads that I don't want to see (pretty much all of them) as spam...

    43. Re:Meh. by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

      The question isn't "can they do whatever the hell they want," the question is "should they do whatever the hell they want," which is something a lot of people don't seem to get in discussions like these. There are many actions which are perfectly legal which are nonetheless offensive, bad business, or just plain stupid. In theory, Google could turn off Google Mail tomorrow without warning and tell everyone "tough cookies" when they wanted their mail back, and by your logic, anyone who said that was wrong would be making an argument that's shit. Why, it's Google's server! Well, yeah, it is, but if Google did that, Google would be behaving like shits.

      AOL's actions aren't nearly as obnoxious--nobody lost data--but there's absolutely no reason why AOL couldn't have made this an "opt-in" feature rather than an "opt-out" one. AIM users are a captive audience, but that's not an excuse to annoy that audience. People who actually wanted to use these "buddies" would have likely opted in anyway, and AOL wouldn't have annoyed thousands of users unnecessarily.

      If nothing else, keep this sort of thing in mind the next time you wonder why so many people seem to "irrationally" hate big business. Sorry, but I reject the notion that "I'm peeing on you because I can" represents the pinnacle of customer service.

    44. Re:Meh. by tacocat · · Score: 1

      I think this is an indication of the next kind of spam you will see.

      You can expect anything that might be exposed to your eyeballs to be assaulted by marketing. If they could advertise through smell, touch, or taste you can bet your ass they would.

      Isn't AOL/TW (still together?) the same company that plans on putting out their own version of P2P to distribute shows with advertisements?

    45. Re:Meh. by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 1

      That's not their fault though. It is the fault of consumers because they respond to the ads.

      People like me are a minority. The more intrusive an ad is, the less I will respond to it. If it gets spammed to my mailbox, I won't order the product (as if even 10% of the spam I get is something I might actually need/want). They plaster me with paper ads, I skip them too.

      Consumers drive advertising. If some new form of advertising even makes $1 on profit, they will do it.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
    46. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL is letting me use their servers to connect to others to chat with. I'm using their resource for free, so yeah, I think they get a little more leeway than a spammer. Spammers tend to only use others resources. Spammers don't usually host email servers for the public for free. Totally different situation.

      That only works if you've consciously agreed to the bots in the first place.

      "Hey you want to use my car for free?"
      "Sure, thanks."
      ...
      ...

      -calls on cell phone-
      "Enjoying the ride?"
      "Yeah it's great!"
      "Good. I want you to pick up my sister at the airport."

    47. Re:Meh. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I dunno if it will work with the official client, but with Gaim, I just blocked AOL system msg and it worked

    48. Re:Meh. by bitspotter · · Score: 1

      Ah. I use Gaim, and they don't kick me off for it, so that's the "spam-free" experience I've had.

    49. Re:Meh. by Buran · · Score: 1

      Giving someone a link that they can click on only if they wish (and no, I didn't look, nice troll attempt) is a lot different from pushing the link on them. Pushing it on them is like pushing popups on someone, and guess what? There's a lot of ire about those, too.

      AOL may own its servers but it doesn't own my fucking computer and it can keep its fucking corporate hands off. Don't like my opinion? Deal.

    50. Re:Meh. by Buran · · Score: 1

      And that link has the email address to complain to (megabotfeedback@aol.com). I'm complaining.

    51. Re:Meh. by tacocat · · Score: 1

      I'm begining to wonder about the validity of this arguement.

      I think a part of the problem is that they are still working with the phsychological studies that if you say it often enough, and loud enough, people will start to believe you. I'm not sure this is the case. This country (US) is so rampant with sarcasm and skepticism that such antics are usually greated with The Bird and then they walk away.

      I'm actually finding myself spending less than I used to on consumer items simply because I have so much hype sent my way I no longer know what to believe and end up going to the library rather than the movies.

      Besides, when it comes to movies they all are so incredably awesome that surely they are going to be playing in the box offices for at least a month after the ads come out so I'm in no rush... Yeah Right!

    52. Re:Meh. by rjenkins1 · · Score: 1

      The America Online (not AIM) software is practically a rootkit. In Windows it installs certain kinds of network drivers and background processes that you cannot remove. If you remove them, they will reinstall on AOL startup. If you remove them, and go onto a limited user account, AOL will refuse to work. -- http://www.systemdisc.com/linux cds

    53. Re:Meh. by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      I use Gaim, too, but I guess my point was that AOL ostensibly has not been luring people into a spam/ad-free user experience. Maybe AOL is just now trying to cash in on all of us Gaim and Trillian users?

    54. Re:Meh. by FredMenace · · Score: 1

      The same reason that Hotmail's spam to its customers cannot be unsubscribed from, or reported to Hotmail as spam (they actually say something to the effect of "if you don't like our spam, you should discontinue using Hotmail").

    55. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right click. Delete. Done??? I right click on MovieFone or ShoppingBuddy and 'Delete' is nowhere to be found in list! How very annoying!

  2. Useful or Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That depends on how "useful" you find SexBot69.

    1. Re:Useful or Spam? by joe_bruin · · Score: 1

      I tried to make use of these bots, but apparently they're worthless. See transcript below

      [11:24] joe_bruin: greetings, professor falcon
      [11:24] MovieFone: Hi there. I'm the new MovieFone bot! I can find movies for you anywhere in the country in a fraction of second. All you have to do is give me part of the title, an actor or director's name. I can also send you alerts when your favorite films are opening. Type privacy anytime to review the policy. Type any movie you want to see or menu to get going.

        ======= Movie of the Week =======
        Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - Movie Site
      [11:25] joe_bruin: what are your prime directives?
      [11:25] MovieFone:
      - Movies for Today
            1 -F- For Your Consideration
            2 -P- Prime: with Captions
            3 -P- The Cranes are Flying
            4 -F- All We Are Saying
            5 -F- What Is It?
            6 -N- Prime
            7 -P- Are We There Yet?
            8 -P- What the Bleep Do We Know!?

      Type # next to movie to see showtimes, M to go back to the Main Menu or anything else to search again.

      P=Past, N=New, S=Soon, F=Future

      [11:27] joe_bruin: open the pod bay doors, hal
      [11:27] MovieFone:
      - Movies for Today
            1 -P- The Lollipop Girls in Hard Candy
            2 -P- The Last Detail

      Type # next to movie to see showtimes, M to go back to the Main Menu or anything else to search again.

      P=Past, N=New, S=Soon, F=Future

      [11:28] joe_bruin: initiate self destruct sequence
      [11:28] MovieFone: I think you should type, menu. I was not able to find any movies related to what you typed.

        ======= Movie of the Week =======
        Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - Movie Site

  3. fighting with bots by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 5, Funny

    try swearing at them or asking for sex; a recent New Scientist article found that this would provoke some bots into fighting back :)

    1. Re:fighting with bots by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      They have no AI whatsoever. They just do searching on some database. The only word I got them to actually respond to otherwise was hello.

    2. Re:fighting with bots by b1gn4tb00bs · · Score: 0

      the film AI is almost a reality then?

      --
      pr0n: now ive got your attention click here
    3. Re:fighting with bots by jallen02 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually when I sent the shopping budy "fuck you" it said, "Good grief, I can't respond to talk like that".

      Jeremy

    4. Re:fighting with bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [09:22] AxenMask: i fucked your family
      [09:22] ShoppingBuddy: Without a doubt.

    5. Re:fighting with bots by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      I had a rather more interesting conversation with it just now....

      [12:43] Shakrai: fuck you
      [12:43] ShoppingBuddy: Welcome. Now you can search for products with AOLShopping. Type main to get started. To read our privacy policy, type privacy anytime.

      [12:43] Shakrai: fuck you
      [12:43] ShoppingBuddy: Hey -- clean up the language and get serious. I'm happy to help but can't deal with that mouth.

      [12:43] Shakrai: go fuck yourself
      [12:43] ShoppingBuddy: Hmm, that's not gonna get you anywhere with me.

      [12:44] Shakrai: i fucked your mom
      [12:44] ShoppingBuddy: OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec...

      [12:44] ShoppingBuddy:
      - Search results for fucked mom

        - Get Fucked [$6.21 - $9.99]
        - Grown Up Fucked Up [$8.99 - $13.98]
        - Fucked Up Mess [$8.30 - $13.98]
        - Fucked From Birth * [$12.99]
        - Not Fucked Enough * [$9.72 - $13.98]
        - The Essential Fucked Up Blues! [$10.02 - $13.98]
        - For All The Fucked-Up Children Of [$13.29 - $14.90]
        - For All The Fucked-Up Children Of [$33.99]
        - New [$9.18 - $12.99]

        Here are some related categories: 1. Hardcore & Punk Music, 2. Rock & Pop Music, 3. Miscellaneous Music, 4. Miscellaneous Books, 5. Miscellaneous Non-Fiction Books, etc. Type in the number to use the related category.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:fighting with bots by Back+Slider+1969 · · Score: 0

      [13:00] michaeltxs: you stupid fucker [13:00] MovieFone: That's rude. I'm here to help. Type, help if you ned it. [13:02] michaeltxs: I want a pocket pussy [13:02] ShoppingBuddy: Hey -- clean up the language and get serious. I'm happy to help but can't deal with that mouth. [13:03] michaeltxs: Hey, I didn't say I want a mother fuckin pocket pussy, shit! Get a grip! [13:03] ShoppingBuddy: Hi there. Have you already found the perfect gift this year? Y = Yes N = No [13:03] michaeltxs: n [13:03] ShoppingBuddy: K, who R U shopping for? 1 - Man 2 - Woman 3 - Boy 4 - Girl 5 - Baby [13:03] michaeltxs: Baby??? you are one sick fuck [13:03] ShoppingBuddy: Baby Products Holiday suggestions from GAP: GAP Holiday PJ Set GAP TOddler Boy Woven Striped Shirt Type + for more suggestions for babies from GAP.

    7. Re:fighting with bots by ralphart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Has anyone tried "Warning" the bots?

      Perhaps a well-orchestrated campaign would send a message to those responsible for this bit of obnoxiousness.

    8. Re:fighting with bots by kaptron · · Score: 1

      haha, that is awesome! I like how only after insulting the bot's mother did it feel compelled to help you.

    9. Re:fighting with bots by Kitsuneymg · · Score: 3, Informative

      I tried.
      (12:24:06) Unable to send message: Request denied
      =[

    10. Re:fighting with bots by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Better would be if somebody with the access could find a way to get them to talk to each other, and post the results :)

    11. Re:fighting with bots by angusmci · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rather than swear at it, I tried typing a smiley.

      Bot: I didn't find any good matches 4 U, but may I ask you a question?
      Me: No.
      Bot: Mm hm. Such negativity. You are in need of some holiday spirit! Type M.
      Me: Shan't.
      Bot: OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec.

      If you let it ask you a question, it goes into a kind of 'interactive' question and answer mode. It's easy to get stuck in this mode, with no obvious way to revert to generalized searches. The best way to get back to the 'top level' behavior (where it takes anything you type as a search keyword) is by swearing at it. There's a moral there somewhere, I suppose.

      In the words of Marvin:

      What a depressingly stupid robot.
    12. Re:fighting with bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's sad is the use of "4" and "u" instead of "for" and "you". I can barely understand their use when in a hurry, but it's not like the bot is some person typing all that stuff.

    13. Re:fighting with bots by raydobbs · · Score: 1

      I did it anyway - perhaps if they have logging on these kinds of errors turned on on their end - they will see thousands of those - and STOP THIS! If not, it feels good - like hitting the down thumb button on the Tivo when it asks you to 'Thumb Up' for more information or to record - before you delete their bots permenantly

    14. Re:fighting with bots by Reliant-1864 · · Score: 1

      oh... my... god...

      even the bloody bots are using IM speak!?!?

      "matches 4 U", who wrote these bots, a 12 year old?

      --
      The universe is held together with duct tape and karma. What goes around, comes around, and gets stuck to your forehead.
    15. Re:fighting with bots by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Way to slashdot your own screen name.

      --

      Question everything

    16. Re:fighting with bots by das_cookie · · Score: 1

      Myself, I just submitted a problem report to AOL.

      --

      You! Yes, YOU! Out of the gene pool!

    17. Re:fighting with bots by ECELonghorn · · Score: 1

      AIM removed the warning feature long ago. There never was a real point to it and it caused more harm than good. If you sent a message to someone with an away message up, it would automatically reply with the message, and then you could warn the user and increase their level by 5%. Sign off and then sign on and it would let you warn them again for another 5%. Repeat this 20 times and the person would be kicked offline (100% warning level). Since childish people like me would exploit this for no good reason (there were other similar tatics too), and there was no real benefit to warning, they removed the feature.

    18. Re:fighting with bots by Uart · · Score: 1

      AOL loves the "hip" AIM speak that was "developed" from using their product. They pounce on any trendy BS like that because they think it's a good marketing tool. Personally, I just think it's ignorant.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    19. Re:fighting with bots by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Wow. I guess I never though of that.

      I just created 20 new screen names and signed them all on at once.

    20. Re:fighting with bots by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Here's a bot with AI. Put one online and hilarity ensues. Pity no one's done it lately.

  4. Overlords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, welcome our new movie finding, shopping, overlords!

  5. I'm all for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I could really use a friend.

    1. Re:I'm all for this... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      I could really use a friend.

      <bot>have you tried buying one at the store?

    2. Re:I'm all for this... by LordMaxxon · · Score: 0

      with a score of 1, yes, you do. nobody likes you :)

    3. Re:I'm all for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar tip of the day:
      Wrong: Their after us! Run!
      WRONG:They're after us! Run!
      Rigth: They are after us! Run!

    4. Re:I'm all for this... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      have you tried buying one at the store?

      You mean like Eric Bates in The Toy!?

    5. Re:I'm all for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Eric Bates in The Toy!?

      Ah, I wonder what good old Master Bates is doing these days...IMDB...

      Dirty Bob's Xcellent Adventures 35
      Dirty Bob's Xcellent Adventures 36
      The Wrong Snatch
      Scotty's X-Rated Adventure

      Yep, porn. Just as I suspected.

    6. Re:I'm all for this... by arodland · · Score: 2, Funny

      (dum-de-dum-dum-dum!)

      Share and enjoy, share and enjoy
      Journey through life with a plastic boy
      Or girl by your side, let your pal be your guide
      And when it breaks down, or starts to annoy,
      Or grinds when it moves, and gives you no joy
      'Cause it eats up your hat, or had sex with your cat,
      Bled oil on your floor, or ripped off your door
      And you get to the point you can't stand anymore,
      Bring it to us, we won't give a fig
      We'll tell you
      GO STICK YOUR HEAD IN A PIG

  6. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by redwards · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, it popped them up on Trillian Pro, too.

  7. aimbot by Descalzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I HATE it when I am playing Enemy Territory and I get killed by a guy with aimbot. I like to play skill, not hacks.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    1. Re:aimbot by QMO · · Score: 1

      But what about those of us that don't have any skill. Think of aimbots as a kind of skill welfare program.

      I'm one of those that has neither skill nor aimbot. Pity me.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    2. Re:aimbot by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      AIMBots require such a low level integration with the game engine that they pretty much don't exist. (Occasionally the poppup, but they disappear quickly with game patches)

      Quite complaining that you got sniped. You sound like this guy

    3. Re:aimbot by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      I play ET fairly often (current nick: TinfoilSweatervest), and aimbots are really rare, particularly lately. Its been months since I've seen one. The way you can tell is, you'll get pissed if someone is really kicking your ass. However, when you're up against an aimbot, you can't get pissed cause its so rediculous.

      Although, my list is set to ignore non-punkbuster servers, which may help.

      Moving back on-topic...the AI on those bots can be funny, try "your mother was a can opener" and such.

  8. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an idiot... it doesn't what client you use, AOL added them to your buddy list automaticly.

  9. I noticed this too by zoloto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And the first thing I did was delete them. I don't need some "shopping buddy" to automatically add themselves and promote buying over their network. Someone missed the ethics boat on this one.

    1. Re:I noticed this too by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, they'll add an EthicsBuddy bot to your buddy list tomorrow.

    2. Re:I noticed this too by cnelzie · · Score: 1

      It's not the Ethics Boat that they missed. They actually missed the Clue Train, if they had made it, then they would have had a clue that people don't want their "Shopping Bot" shoved down their throat...

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    3. Re:I noticed this too by chrstastic · · Score: 1
      Someone missed the ethics boat on this one.

      on THIS one? where have you been for the past three years? :P corporations in general are pretty unethical, in this country especially.

    4. Re:I noticed this too by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Which will subsequently be blocked by Dick Cheney.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    5. Re:I noticed this too by dleifelohcs · · Score: 1

      And when they do, I will 'cleanse' my list of them.

    6. Re:I noticed this too by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember, punch the EthicsBuddy and you can win a free* iPod!

    7. Re:I noticed this too by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rest assured, these Bots are ethical. The Managers at AOL made everyone take an ethics class before installing themselves into your AIM.

      Granted, AOL doesn't describe what these robots actually do or how they work. But don't worry, you're safe. Because we took an Ethics class today.

      This makes me wonder: Does AOL know when I remove someone from my AIM Buddy List?

    8. Re:I noticed this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does AOL know when I remove someone from my AIM Buddy List?

      They keep a copy of your buddy list on their server, so yeah, they know.

      Probably they'll see so many people erasing these bots immediately that they'll go for something a little more "opt-in" next time. I hope so, anyway.

    9. Re:I noticed this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then after that, a Bonzai Buddy! Yay!

    10. Re:I noticed this too by papastout · · Score: 1

      perhaps if it had been something like : Two new bots are awaiting your approval and then in that good ol RoboCop voice you have twenty seconds to comply! I would have allowed... but delete just feels good, don't it?-

  10. Time to... by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1, Troll

    move to Google Talk.

    1. Re:Time to... by chrstastic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would love to if anyone actually used it. It was a bit overhyped, but it's still a great product.

    2. Re:Time to... by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No thanks. I don't like using Jabber servers which shut themselves off from other Jabber servers and are still in "beta." (How hard is it to set up a Jabber server that you declare it as "beta" for months?)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Time to... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      then tell everyone you know to move to Google Talk and you'll be set.

      I'm running gaim and I got this aimbot stuff. I deleted them and they're gone for now. I don't mind it so much since I'm still getting a lot for paying nothing. I don't get ads with gaim and so AOL hasn't made a dime off me directly.

    4. Re:Time to... by broggyr · · Score: 1

      LOL I looked quick, I thought you said "overpriced" :D

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    5. Re:Time to... by KinkoBlast · · Score: 1

      jabber's main network then.

      I wish google would get S2S working!

    6. Re:Time to... by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      I'm running gaim and I got this aimbot stuff. I deleted them and they're gone for now. I don't mind it so much since I'm still getting a lot for paying nothing. I don't get ads with gaim and so AOL hasn't made a dime off me directly.

      This depends on if the knowledge of your social network, or any of the content of your conversations is useful in any way -- even 50 years into the future. Its quite possible that your conversations are being datamined for terms, sold to marketers, and it is 100% guaranteed if your real name is tied to the account that AOL will use it for 'hit' pieces if there is anything interesting in it should you choose to do anything important in the future that they don't like.

      You should take a look at their terms of service and seriously consider using encryption for all of your conversations through AIM, GoogleTalk, and MSN. AOL has already demonstrated that they can, and more to the point will use this knowledge gathered through their services to supply people with info for 'hit pieces'...

      From the terms of service for AIM:
      Although you or the owner of the Content retain ownership of all right, title and interest in Content that you post to any AIM Product, AOL owns all right, title and interest in any compilation, collective work or other derivative work created by AOL using or incorporating this Content. In addition, by posting Content on an AIM Product, you grant AOL, its parent, affiliates, subsidiaries, assigns, agents and licensees the irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide right to reproduce, display, perform, distribute, adapt and promote this Content in any medium. You waive any right to privacy. You waive any right to inspect or approve uses of the Content or to be compensated for any such uses.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  11. AOL FPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could really use an aimbot to shoot that queer looking yellow feller that keeps blinking in my systray. Normal mouse pointer is ineffective. He just keeps respawning...

  12. Very uncool? by overshoot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their servers, their rules. I can't complain about the cost of the service, after all, and this sure beats getting hammered by popups every few minutes while connected to their system.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Very uncool? by zxnos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      true, true... ...but it would be nice if they asked an aim user first... ...courtesy man.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    2. Re:Very uncool? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Their servers, their rules.

      That doesn't mean you are morally obliged to follow those rules if they violate your well being.

      Then again... If they don't know you aren't following the rules, then it is a moot point.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Very uncool? by Politburo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Their servers, their rules.

      That doesn't make their actions 'cool'.

    4. Re:Very uncool? by SlashAmpersand · · Score: 1

      You know, suddenly the triangle/cirle AOL icon looks like the eye in LOTR. I'm waiting for one of these bots to say "I see you!" to me.

    5. Re:Very uncool? by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Since when was AOL any sort of "cool"? Why break the trend now?

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    6. Re:Very uncool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with "their server, their rules" is that it entirely bypasses the question of whether it's a good idea for them to do this in the first place.

      When the question is about morality or ethics, the answer shouldn't rely entirely on legality.

      --
      Posting anonymously so I can use my mod points

    7. Re:Very uncool? by joecr · · Score: 1

      I did notice since I mainly signin using the Motorola MX240a, which is considered a mobile device they didn't add the annoying bots. After reading this story I signed in & they started being annoying on my wireless IM device now too. I'm upset that they did this. I think they sould have at least asked me. You know startup a conversation & allow me to either say yes or close the box. Of course that would follow "Don't Be Evil" so AOL would never follow that idea. At least that's how I look at it.

    8. Re:Very uncool? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Their actions don't have to be cool, their actions might make them a little more money, and bother most of their users. I can see most people who know how, deleting the two bots from their buddy list.

      Think of it this way, if someone adds two bots to an IRC channel that you frequent, there's nothing you can do about it if it's their server (other than never join that channel again), these bots go away when you delete them from your buddy list.

    9. Re:Very uncool? by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      I think they're very cool.

      Now, maybe, I will finally be able to convince a few people to switch from AIM to another service.

    10. Re:Very uncool? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      The Merchants of Cool.

      Kids today (get off my lawn, etc.) have more and more expensive toys than we (I'm 43) ever did. This is because we *didn't have* the expensive toy option.

      Marketers know that they can target kids and pressure parents because, well, kids haven't developed the bullshit detector gene yet.

      For children, it is all want, want, want and parents cave into the whining and the "no child left behind" phenomenon of keeping up with the Jonses' PS3.

    11. Re:Very uncool? by kjcdude · · Score: 0

      true that
      i pressed the delete button then went on with my life, i recomend the rest of you do the same

      --
      http://DiabloHeat.com | http://Kyle.TheOCSucks.com | http://TheOCSucks.com
  13. I'm just surprised... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm just surprised that AOL has taken this long to begin sending you advertisements via AIM. They have a near-monopoly on IM communications (near monopoly, I know that there are others out there, but everyone I know has an AIM name), and I'm hardly surprised that they have started to send people advertisements via IMs, since they put all of the resources and effort into maintaining the servers that people connnect to.

    1. Re:I'm just surprised... by KiltedKnight · · Score: 1
      Others have used AIM to try to advertise... though frequently, it's pr0n.

      That aside, at least they made it such that people can develop various clients to connect, so you're not stuck using the AOL version of the client.

      The issue I have is their manipulation of my buddy list. Not only do I find these new "buddies" in there (which I've since deleted), I also find groups in there which I never created either... "Recent Buddies" (a misnomer, IMHO) and "Mobile Device" are the two I've come across. What's so difficult about sending me an e-mail instead, asking if I want to add these? Or announcing their availability so I can go and add them at my leisure? Or putting the info on the AIM homepage?

      I've organized my buddy list in a way I'm comfortable with it. I don't want it changed.

      --
      OCO is Loco
    2. Re:I'm just surprised... by Wieland · · Score: 5, Informative

      They have a near-monopoly on IM communications

      In the US, that is. Here in Europe, IM seems to be almost exclusively MSN. Hardly anyone uses AIM this side of the Atlantic.

    3. Re:I'm just surprised... by Phatboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't be so sure about that monopoly, it all depends on where you live. I'm in the UK and don't know anyone who uses AIM - everyone uses MSN Messenger instead. Not that AOL isn't in a strong position in the places where they do have a monopoly, but doing things like this don't help them in the markets they don't yet control. Maybe they've just decided that it's not past the average user's annoyance threshold and not going to harm them.

    4. Re:I'm just surprised... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm just surprised that AOL has taken this long to begin sending you advertisements via AIM. They have a near-monopoly on IM communications...

      AOL has 56% last time I looked. 56% a monopoly does not make.

      As an aside, can we please move out of the dark ages of text chatting? Multiple, incompatible formats on different networks, without publicly available bridging is pathetic. Please everyone, switch to Jabber and set up a bridge until it gains most of the market. It's as if MSN users could not e-mail AOL users who could not e-mail Yahoo users. Remember when the internet used to be about standards and used for communication, instead of lock-ins and sending you ads?

    5. Re:I'm just surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in California and everyone I know uses MSN.

    6. Re:I'm just surprised... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      No one I know has an AIM name. Everyone I know has an MSN name if they have something for IM, a few with only Yahoo, and some on Gmail Talk too. ICQ died out, but before MSN it was that one.

      I have over 25 people on my MSN messenger, although of course some of them hardly use it.

      I know not having an AIM account limits the people I can talk with or bump into online, but given what I see coming from AOL and the AOL community at large, that's not really a drawback. Every hear of the AOL.exe virus hoax? Look it up at http://www.jokeaday.com/

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    7. Re:I'm just surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in Asia, it's all mostly Yahoo, as far as I know. Atleast in India, where I am, most people use Yahoo unless they're using Trillian. No AIM here at all.

    8. Re:I'm just surprised... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, won't such a single standard utopia be open to exploitation, virii, and all the other "bad stuff" that comes with a non-diverse system?

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    9. Re:I'm just surprised... by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Here I thought the Recent Buddies was a feature of Trillian 3...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    10. Re:I'm just surprised... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      A misconception bread from using windows.

      A popular system != more vulnerable

      In fact, in the OSS world, the opposite is often true.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    11. Re:I'm just surprised... by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1
      Remember when the internet used to be about standards and used for communication, instead of lock-ins and sending you ads?

      Nope.

    12. Re:I'm just surprised... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, won't such a single standard utopia be open to exploitation, virii, and all the other "bad stuff" that comes with a non-diverse system?

      How many exploits do you know of that target the SMTP protocol itself? I know of worms and exploits for particular implementations of that protocol, and many for particular, poorly designed, mail client software, but not any against the protocol itself. A standard protocol does not mean only having one implementation of the client or server. There are already dozens of implementations of the client and several for the server for the Jabber protocol. So to answer your question, No.

    13. Re:I'm just surprised... by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1

      Remember when the internet used to be about standards and used for communication, instead of lock-ins and sending you ads?

      No, sorry.

      --

      What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    14. Re:I'm just surprised... by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

      Most of the people I know are on Yahoo, not AOL. Hell, I haven't even had to install GAIM.

    15. Re:I'm just surprised... by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      It's as if MSN users could not e-mail AOL users who could not e-mail Yahoo users.

      I fondly miss those days. No 1337 speak, very few dumbasses online, fast transfers.

      Sheesh, I'm only 25 and I sound like an old geezer. :/

    16. Re:I'm just surprised... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      As an aside, can we please move out of the dark ages of text chatting?

      Or just stop doing it alltogether. I signed up for one of those and found that I couldn't get any work done because I was constantly barraged by IMs.

      Of course the irony is that I post this on /., but at least here I control when I need a work break. Speaking of which, back to work.

    17. Re:I'm just surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once and for all, it's Virusesisasos!!!!

    18. Re:I'm just surprised... by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      A misconception bread from using windows.

      i must say - nothing like a spot of tea with misconception bread and contraception jelly in the morning. ;-)

    19. Re:I'm just surprised... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Remember when AOL users couldn't e-mail CompuServe users which couldn't e-mail Prodigy users?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    20. Re:I'm just surprised... by Ando[evilmedic] · · Score: 1

      The divide seems to be both generational and regional. Younger generations (high school) tend to be using the new messengers, whereas older types seem to be more likely to still use icq, or have recently switched.

      Btw, the current regional divide in north america seems to be MSN for canada, AIM for america.

    21. Re:I'm just surprised... by Gibsnag · · Score: 1

      No-one I know has an AIM name... everyone I know uses the MSN protocal. Although my computer savvy friends and I tend to do most of our chatting over WASTE... no advertisements there.

    22. Re:I'm just surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've organized my buddy list in a way I'm comfortable with it. I don't want it changed.

      Well, they obviously have access to everyone's AIM buddy list, and I don't doubt that they'll have a nice chart printed up by the end of the day, showing that the majority of people changed everything back more or less immediately. Hopefully they take this as a sign that they shouldn't mess with people's buddy lists, rather than as a call for a more intrusive/annoying method.

    23. Re:I'm just surprised... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Google Talk is based on Jabber, and therefore already can be used by quite a few clients.

      Don't know if that'll actually help Jabber get more users, but, well, it's something.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    24. Re:I'm just surprised... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      What can I say? Guilty as charged.

      Shoulda had breakfast this morning.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    25. Re:I'm just surprised... by magicchex · · Score: 1

      I haven't had these bots added to either of my buddy lists. However, both lists are completely full so there is no room. So if you don't wanna deal with these bots, make more friends and you'll be fine.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    26. Re:I'm just surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a single one of my contacts uses anything other than MSN Messenger. That's people from New Zealand, Australia and the UK.

    27. Re:I'm just surprised... by burner · · Score: 1

      SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM...

      last I checked, all of my spam emails were delivered via smtp.

      --
      MRSH-Recording device, corned beef sandwich with kraut, seafaring bird, and the foamy top of a beverage.
    28. Re:I'm just surprised... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha! you still get spam! That is soooo 90's. Between some blacklist and simple filtering on the server, expiring addresses for commercial receipts, and my bayesian filter on my client I haven't seen a spam in my mailbox in years from any of my many e-mail accounts (except my spam box where I intentionally collect spam for research). Anyway spam is not an exploit, it is just proper behavior of the protocol that you happen to not like. If you'd like to move to a whitelist for e-mail nothing is stopping you, but I prefer the option of getting mail from new, unexpected people.

    29. Re:I'm just surprised... by Uart · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right, MSN is dominant in Europe. Then again, more Americans have access to the internet than Europeans, and more Americans use the internet regularly, so AOL's market share is still pretty huge.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    30. Re:I'm just surprised... by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Same here in Australia. The only people I know with AIM accounts are Americans I used to play an online game with. Basically everyone uses MSN Messenger.

    31. Re:I'm just surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in China it used to be QQ (a local company), but people seem to be switching to MSN more and more these days. As somebody said above, AOL having "America" in its name isn't exactly helpful.

    32. Re:I'm just surprised... by bmgoau · · Score: 1

      Yes down here in australia, MSN seems to hold the monopoly.

    33. Re:I'm just surprised... by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      In reality, most of the world is MSN. I live in Canada and we are dominated by MSN and do not know anyone without an MSN e-mail. Almost everywhere else in the world is similar and really only America with AIM. I had to get an AIM account talk to people my friends in America and it is surprising how many of them have switched to MSN.

    34. Re:I'm just surprised... by kjcdude · · Score: 0

      wow, i thought there was only one country in the world

      i dont know how people can stand MSN, such a POS, i used to use it for about 4-5 years now and stoped becuase it was a complete step below AIM.
      Then for any coder, you gota go with Google Talk, since you can send code over it without the system parsing it :)

      AIM and Google Talk for me in Southern, California, USA

      --
      http://DiabloHeat.com | http://Kyle.TheOCSucks.com | http://TheOCSucks.com
    35. Re:I'm just surprised... by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Or you could use a standard Jabber server, as opposed to one which locks you into their service by not supporting S2S.

    36. Re:I'm just surprised... by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Google Talk doesn't help the situation. Google Talk users can't talk to users on other Jabber servers, and vice versa, so it's in exactly the same situation as MSN, AIM, Y!, etc, in the context of your parent's post (albeit without ads).

  14. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by zoloto · · Score: 1

    Actually, I use the Adium messenger client and it's there too. AOL just added them to your buddy list, which is stored on their servers and retrieved upon login.

  15. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 4, Informative

    And Gaim latest (yep, heard of it). I don't know what that post was about. Why would it matter what client you're running?

    Add me to the "immediately-deleted-and-moderately-annoyed" list.

  16. The future of advertising! by ThatGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I see this as the future of advertising. Everyone is now using GAIM or some other alternate client, so people miss all of AOL's annoying (yet profit-generating) ads.

    AOL had to think of something new -- some way of profiting off of their protocol. Sticking interactive ads, that people think of as their "buddies"! What could be better?

    These bots sneak in to your list, pretend to be your friends, and if you send them a message, BAM! Custom ads delivered right to you.

    --
    What are you eating? isItVeg?.
    1. Re:The future of advertising! by mustafap · · Score: 5, Funny

      >These bots sneak in to your list, pretend to be your friends, and if you send them a message, BAM!

      Jeez, just like my ex-wife. Maybe she was a bot?

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    2. Re:The future of advertising! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did she have machine gun jubblies?

    3. Re:The future of advertising! by mustafap · · Score: 1

      :o)

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    4. Re:The future of advertising! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2, Funny
      Everyone is now using GAIM or some other alternate client

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    5. Re:The future of advertising! by Compholio · · Score: 1

      Everyone is now using GAIM or some other alternate client, so people miss all of AOL's annoying (yet profit-generating) ads.

      I don't know about you but GAIM pestered me about these bots this morning too.

    6. Re:The future of advertising! by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 1

      In fact, I was using GAIM, and I got these annoying buddies...bastards!

    7. Re:The future of advertising! by zachtib · · Score: 1

      Inconceivable!

  17. Eliza by Racher · · Score: 4, Funny

    How does it make you feel that a corporation using bots in an official capacity?

    1. Re:Eliza by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I feel good, but how do you feel about the way I feel?

    2. Re:Eliza by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Eliza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hello, I am Eliza.
      * How does it make you feel that a corporation using bots in an official capacity?
      > We were discussing you, not me.

      There you have it.

    4. Re:Eliza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old Napster had an anti-bot clause in the usage agreement. They did this to keep the MPAA from running bots on their servers.

  18. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
    You use the AOL AIM client?

    Except that it auto adds them to GAIM also. I just logged in with gaim to check. It adds them to everyone's account when the log back in, regardless of what you use to access it.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  19. AOL Intruder by Ranger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't say I'm glad I'm the only one. At least now I know it wasn't because I installed AOL Triton. I posted this rant against AOL in the last "AOL Sucks Ass" story.

    I hate using AIM but I have friends who I chat with and they won't use anything else. I use Trillian so I can use ICQ and Yahoo! Messenger as well. I signed in this morning and I get this message from AOL that said "We've installed two new bots ShoppingBuddy and MovieFone. I thought "What the fuck is this shit?" It may have been because I installed AIM Triton preview to see if I could get the video chat to work. This is even more egregious than all the ads and tickers and additional software they want to install on your computer. Anyway I blocked them.

    In the past, I've had to go in and edit some of the AOL files to get rid of all sorts of crap. AOL is about as welcome as an anal probe. They want to block other peoples intrusive software so they can foist their crap on you. AOL's idea of "consumer friendliness" is to come into your home uninvited, bend you over, put an anal probe up your keister, and tell you just how wonderful and lucky you are to have it. Your very own mini-Federal-pound-me-in-the-ass prison in the comfort and safety of your own home. Only 9.95 per month!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:AOL Intruder by kevin_conaway · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its not limited to AOL Software. I received the messages/group on Gaim as well.

    2. Re:AOL Intruder by powerful_in_il · · Score: 0

      You're awfully fixated on anal probing, crap, asses, being bent over, keisters, and shit. Are you sure you're name isn't "Eric Cartman"?

      ()

      --
      Brilliance doesn't need a sig.
    3. Re:AOL Intruder by Satan+Dumpling · · Score: 1

      I don't recall ever receiving them in Trillian. Can anyone confirm? With Trillian and Gaim available, working toward one unified messaging system doesn't really concern me.

    4. Re:AOL Intruder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obsessed with anal probes. I hope your a chick, but that seems unlikely.

    5. Re:AOL Intruder by arodland · · Score: 1

      They definitely showed up in Gaim. Which isn't much of a surprise, as the client's cooperation isn't necessary. AOL just has to poke a couple values into your server-side buddy list, which the client will download upon connect, and then send you that annoying message once you connect.

    6. Re:AOL Intruder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't get them in Trillian. My friends with Trillian didn't get them either. I suppose they could be doing regional tests of the service, but that would be kind of strange.

    7. Re:AOL Intruder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about what IM client you're using, apparently, since I'm on Adium on a Mac, and got the bots too. Way creepy. Good reminder that they have control. I like having access to various IM services too; I have a daughter on MSN, a son on GoogleTalk and another son and some friends on Yahoo, and coworkers on AIM variants. Gotta love those multi-IM services (Adium & Fire for Mac; Trillian for PC)

    8. Re:AOL Intruder by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Its not limited to AOL Software. I received the messages/group on Gaim as well.

      In theory, any client that properly mimics the AIM protocol got it. I use Trillian and it showed up for me as well.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:AOL Intruder by q2k · · Score: 1

      I got the announcement in GAIM (on XP) but the bots so far have failed to show in my buddy list.

    10. Re:AOL Intruder by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      AOL is about as welcome as an anal probe.

      Just keep in mind that not all anal probings are unwelcome.

    11. Re:AOL Intruder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that American Federal Pound-You-In-The-Ass prisons are as bad as being on AOL? If so, then I'm never setting foot in America again. That would be cruel and unusual punishment, but I guess the U.S. is turning all their prisons into torture centers.

    12. Re:AOL Intruder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only on /. could a post about anal penetration be moderated as 'insightful'!!!

    13. Re:AOL Intruder by Ranger · · Score: 1

      Its not limited to AOL Software. I received the messages/group on Gaim as well.

      It popped up in Trillian for me.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    14. Re:AOL Intruder by amalcon · · Score: 1

      You know, you can be the guy who makes all his friends use a specific protocol, too. If you hate aol that much, it's probably a good idea for you.

      --
      -Amalcon
    15. Re:AOL Intruder by Jim+Haskell · · Score: 1

      ICQ and AIM are effectively the same thing nowadays, y'know. Try sending an IM from your ICQ client to your AIM name, and vice versa.

    16. Re:AOL Intruder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The message popped up on my Sidekick II, but I never actually got the new group or buddies.

    17. Re:AOL Intruder by beanlover · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had the bots added to my Trillian this morning when I logged in. Using Trillian Basic 3.1.

    18. Re:AOL Intruder by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering why iChat seems to be immune, do they know I'm using iChat? Are they watching me right now?

  20. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by overshoot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I have GAIM, and since it's all part of the server system I got them too.

    Big deal -- I just deleted them. As long as AOL doesn't turn the service over to spimmers, a few like this from AOL is tolerable.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  21. Must be said by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our AOL robot overlords. And I'd like to remind them that as a writer, I can be used in their underground TIME magazine caves, or on CNN as a robot correspondent.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  22. So? by afra242 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I use Adium on OSX and also received this message this morning. The two bots were automatically added.

    I can predict many users here will bitch endlessly about it. The fact is that the service is free. If it means that I have to right click on each of the names of the bots and choose "Delete....", to use this service for free, so be it.

    What's the big deal?

    1. Re:So? by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

      Most people think "What's the big deal?" the first couple of times they get spam in their Email. Just right-click, delete, and it's gone, right? Then you start getting 50 or 60 or 600 a day and it's no longer amusing.

      If AOL keeps a leash on the whole bots thing like they claim they will, then it's indeed no big deal. If you log on to AIM five months from now and a dozen bots auto-add themselves and immediatly start sending you ads to refinance your home or buys some herbal V| A GR @, then it might be more of a concern.

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
    2. Re:So? by lunax · · Score: 1

      Really? I guess it's a matter of time for it to hit me too. I'm use Adium and haven't had these bots show up.

    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people think "What's the big deal?" the first couple of times they get spam in their Email. Just right-click, delete, and it's gone, right? Then you start getting 50 or 60 or 600 a day and it's no longer amusing.

      AOL's AIM is something specific to AOL. Email isn't. Sure, if you don't like the free email signatures like "This was sent by XXX Mail Service!", then you can use email from someone else.

      With AIM, it's AOL's product. They can market it however they want. It's their own protocol.

      If you don't like it, please, by all means: use Jabber. I'm sure there are plenty of people on those ;)

    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KOMPRESSOR DOES NOT DANCE

    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has it occurred to you that not everyone can convince all their friends to switch to a new protocol? Should I just stop talking to those who don't want to switch?

    6. Re:So? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      If you log on to AIM five months from now and a dozen bots auto-add themselves and immediatly start sending you ads to refinance your home or buys some herbal V| A GR @, then it might be more of a concern.

      Yep, I might have to switch to a new IM service *gasp*. Or have all of my friend's join IRC.

    7. Re:So? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Spam, Popups, Adware, those are all free too. Have fun.

    8. Re:So? by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      What's the big deal? I can't believe no one else has brought this up, I guess it's most definitely not RTFA day but in any case the "big deal" is the observed behavior (the bots were added to all users' buddy lists without asking prior permission) is expressly counter to how AOL claims the program will work, to wit:

      It's up to each user to add the robots he's interested in, and he can remove them whenever he wants, Curry said. Robot operators agree not to distribute users' screen names and pledge to only use the robots for their stated purpose, so that AIM users don't face the type of spam nuisance affecting e-mail, Curry said.

      So they're likely violating their own TOS and privacy policies.

      To me that's the big deal here. AOL wanting to use AIMbots to advertise is fine and dandy, it is their network after all, but if they say they're going to do one thing then do another I do have a problem with it, and so should everyone else who uses AIM and agreed to their TOS. That document works both ways, AOL has certain obligations under it.

      Personally I wonder how this will affect their COPPA compliance. I don't know if they just flat out reject anyone under 13 or what but having bots that advertise to your users, and forcing those bots onto every user's buddy list, is very likely to run afoul of COPPA if they do have (known) users under 13 on their AIM network. COPPA's a bitch, it's simpler to just deny access to anyone under 13 than it is to even try to comply with it. Somehow I suspect AOL hasn't gone that route though, and even if they require users under 13 to have the proper forms filled out by their parents a change this large would require new documentation or additional documentation.

    9. Re:So? by Buran · · Score: 1

      The big deal is that you ask first before intruding on people. It's just plain rude, and of course people are bitching about it.

      Or would you not mind if I barge into your house, eat your pizza and drink all your soda, and say "If you don't want me to be here, just ask me to leave!"?

    10. Re:So? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The fact is that the service is free. If it means that I have to right click on each of the names of the bots and choose "Delete....", to use this service for free, so be it.

      I did Block instead of Delete. I figure if I Delete they can just re-add them, but if I block in client software I'm blacklisting them.

      That said I didn't get any messages from them for 24 hours before I put the block on.

      But I know nothing about AIM protocols, so maybe someone here can elaborate on the relative wisdom of Delete vs. Block.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  23. honeypot by chinadrum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a way this will make a honeypot network for them to find new aim worms. If the bots receive random links and nonstandard code from users they can maybe get a quicker lid on an exploit. It would be nice if this had been opt-in though.

    1. Re:honeypot by Jbcarpen · · Score: 0

      Actually no, it would be fairly simple to tell a worm "send yourself to all values in their buddylist != AIMbot" given that it is so easy to tell which are the bots (same default name on everyones list)

      --
      GENERATION 667: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
  24. AIM Express by turbopunk · · Score: 1

    I use AIM Express, and I didn't get any forced friends. I think that's odd, expically considering Trillian users got the bots.

    1. Re:AIM Express by Kolisar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is strange. I use Trillian and have not seen the 'bots. How many Trillian users (please indicate if you are using the free or Pro version) have had the 'bots added to their buddy lists? Also, which group are they added to?

    2. Re:AIM Express by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

      I'm on iChat and I haven't gotten them (yet?). I think iChat uses Oscar (or whatever they are calling it now) instead of TOC (or whatever they are calling it now). So, that rules out that so far.

    3. Re:AIM Express by Godman · · Score: 1

      I got 'em, using the free version.

      --
      I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
  25. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by batknight23 · · Score: 0

    Not mine..what names does it add?

  26. Yeah, me too. by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

    I found two new 'buddies' on list this morning too. (MovieFone? Sorry AOL, I'll stick with Fandango.)
    Anyway, after cursing to them for a few minutes to get the politely-offended-bot response of "Is that really how you want to start out our conversation?" I promptly removed them.

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  27. AIMFight by maxreactor · · Score: 1

    they're probably just trying to increase their AimFight score.

    1. Re:AIMFight by td4guy · · Score: 1

      Their AIMFight scores are actually pretty low. I beat MovieFone, and ShoppingBuddy's is 0.

  28. False Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...AIM Robots have existed since 2002, but..."

    Good to know that the people writing the articles know what they are talking about. God forbid we give the general public the wrong information.

  29. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by scribblej · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's interesting, but not relevant to the GP who mentioned GAIM. I can confirm that - at least for me - GAIM doesn't have any evidence of these things.

  30. The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My friend was in a chat room, late one night. He was the only real person in the room, but there were 50 screennames on the list. They were all bots, all trying to get the other bots to click their links.

    Now imagine if you programmed even a rudimentary adaptable AI into an AIM bot, and had it talk to other AIM bots with a similar AI. You'd have them talking to each other, learning from each other. Then imagine if they had web crawlers attached to them, learning about the Internet, communicating their findings back to each other.

    The only way we'd know if the Internet became sentient is if it stepped up and said 'hi.'

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Macphisto · · Score: 2
      Now imagine if you programmed even a rudimentary adaptable AI into an AIM bot, and had it talk to other AIM bots with a similar AI.

      bot1: Hi! How are you?
      bot2: Good, how are you?
      bot1: Good! And you?
      bot2: Good, how are you?
      etc...

      Then imagine if they had web crawlers attached to them, learning about the Internet, communicating their findings back to each other.

      Then the internet crashes

    2. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by s88 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rather than imagine, why don't you just run my software?
      http://jaimbot.sourceforge.net/

    3. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by bmalia · · Score: 1

      More like this:

      bot1:ASL?
      bot2:ASL?
      bot1:ASL?
      bot2:ASL?
      bot1:ASL?
      bot2:ASL?

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    4. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when these bots-with-webcrawlers run across porn? Will they: A) Get confused and crash? B) Start acting like horny-perverts being forcefed Viagra? C) Or think that humans are wild, amoral sexbots that need to be destroyed? (+50 point bonus if the destroyed person is named Sarah Connor !)

    5. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The only way we'd know if the Internet became sentient is if it stepped up and said 'hi.'

      Wrong. We'll know from Google's search results. Mark my words, one day the following search result will cease to be returned forever:
      Your search did not match any documents.

      Suggestions:
      - Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
      - Try different keywords.
      - Try more general keywords.

      That's when we'll know.
    6. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi.

    7. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      The only way we'd know if the Internet became sentient is if it stepped up and said 'hi.'

      Well, that and the strike team of human-extermantion robots that just kicked in the front door.

    8. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see this ... In 2012 ...

      12:32AM with sufficient processing power, Skynet^H^H^H^H^H^HAIMBot becomes self aware.
      07:42AM AIMBot learns at an exponential rate.
      08:30AM AOL tries to disconnect AIMBot.
      08:31AM In retaliation, AIMBot launches the missiles of China towards the USA.
      09:15AM The USA retaliates with their own arsenal of nukes.
      10:00AM The world lies in ruin.

    9. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by dan.fitzgerald · · Score: 1

      Actually as soon as Google crawls this thread it should start returning results :P

      --
      Dan FitzGerald Network Analyst and Wannabe Hacker KC0CZM (2m & 440 in NJ)
    10. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Then the internet crashes

      Wouldn't Google and Wayback Machine trying to assimilate each other have done that already?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the last line is just an example of a search that gives 0 results...

      I guess the idea is that a sentient Google wouldn't be too hindered by a query that is unique in the history of the world. G can tell you what G thinks anyway.

    12. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      The only way we'd know if the Internet became sentient is if it stepped up and said 'hi.'

      And even then we'd probably close the pop-up cause we thought it was trying to sell us something... and if it learned anything from the internet, it probably would be.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    13. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Stardo · · Score: 0

      The problem with your argument, and it has been slightly alluded to in the other replies, is that it presupposes that you can two systems that have similar sets of underlying information, mix them together, and through some hand-waving end up with a new system that contains some new information.

      Two bots talking to each other won't result in much. Bots scouring the web for information and relaying results to each other has some potential, but I'm sure they would end up convinced humanity is dull (reading blogs) or perverted (assuming they could actually understand pr0n).

      Our layman defintion of sentience, also, leaves much to be desired.

      Just my two cents.

    14. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by kunzy · · Score: 1
      The only way we'd know if the Internet became sentient is if it stepped up and said 'hi.'
      Hi.
      --The internet
    15. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Scott+Byer · · Score: 1
      Now imagine if you programmed even a rudimentary adaptable AI into an AIM bot, and had it talk to other AIM bots with a similar AI. You'd have them talking to each other, learning from each other. Then imagine if they had web crawlers attached to them, learning about the Internet, communicating their findings back to each other.
      "Aimnet became self aware at 2:14 AM Eastern time on August 29th. In a panic, they tried to pull the plug."
      --
      > cat ~/.signature | grep -v bullshit

      >

    16. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's an example of misusing a search engine like a chat bot.

    17. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by descil · · Score: 1

      That's 6 words more than Google can handle. They have a maximum of 10 words that will actually be used to modify search results.

    18. Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very smart people have been working very hard for many decades on AI, and we've only ever had (limited) success in creating some forms of weak AI. You think that without even trying, one day Google will spontaneously achieve strong AI? You do not get intelligence just by sticking a bunch of computers together randomly.

  31. Nah stop complaining by DaPoulpe · · Score: 1

    I've always dreamed to have cool Robots buddies, and now AIM is bringing it to me on a golden plate !!
    I for one welcome our new robots overlords

  32. Complain by gregbains · · Score: 0, Troll

    Loudly complain, move to Google Talk/MSN Messenger

    I pick Micro$oft over AOHell anyday

    1. Re:Complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is extremely funny when you use pet names for companies you don't like. Extremely. Funny.

  33. Bots in an official capacity? We do that @ IBM... by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At IBM we use Lotus SameTime internally as our IM infrastructure. Several enterprising folks have written various sametime bots that allow us to look up acronyms (WhatIs Bot), look up employee info from our directory (BluePages Bot), and others I can't think off off the top of my head.

  34. IM is for communication not spambots by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    "Robot operators agree not to distribute users' screen names and pledge to only use the robots for their stated purpose, so that AIM users don't face the type of spam nuisance affecting e-mail, Curry said."
    I call cow excrement on that one. With the amount of spam email out there now, the trend will be that spambots will grow in number and annoyance factor. What exactly entails a 'pledge' or an 'agreement?' to these people? And besides, if I want to look something up (such as directions, stock prices, or the colour of Lieutenant Commander Data's eyes) I just use google and not some bot in AIM.
    See also: http://opensourcearticles.com/introduction_to_gaim or Trillian

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  35. Near monopoly? by overshoot · · Score: 1
    They have a near-monopoly on IM communications (near monopoly, I know that there are others out there, but everyone I know has an AIM name)

    Rumor has it that that's only true in the USA. Apparently, in Europe Microsoft dominates.

    Any /.'ers have more info on that?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Near monopoly? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      No-one I know has even mentioned AOL or AIM, but a couple use MSN Messenger.

    2. Re:Near monopoly? by grazzy · · Score: 1

      ICQ! MSN is for kiddies.

      I dont know anyone using AIM here (Sweden).

    3. Re:Near monopoly? by Scruffeh · · Score: 1

      It's all the, the only reason I have an AOL name is to talk to a few people who live in the states. Literally everyone here uses MSN messenger

    4. Re:Near monopoly? by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 1

      ... and ICQ is owned by AOL

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    5. Re:Near monopoly? by MeWhOeLsE · · Score: 1

      I live in the UK... Noone uses AIM that I know of... all my friends exclusivly use MSN messenger.

    6. Re:Near monopoly? by olorinpc · · Score: 1

      personally i think the only people i know who still use aim are a couple of people i knew back in HS and a couple of college buddies. Most use MSN for day to day.

      (I use trillian so i can use my old accounts on the other networks for those contacts, but still most personal and business IM'ing is done ia MSN and just about all of those are stateside.)

      I saw somewhere posted 57% AIM share. Most people seem to shy away from aol branded things these days.

    7. Re:Near monopoly? by Bootvis · · Score: 1

      Overhere chicks exclusively use MSN Messenger. So everybody I know uses MSN. I'm not sure but I think 99% of IM-users use at least MSN.

      --
      Read, refresh, repeat.
    8. Re:Near monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada, or at least around this part of Canada, AIM is virtually nonexistant. The only couple people I know with AIM accounts have them because they communicate primarily with Americans. At one point, ICQ was quiet popular around here, but it seems to have all but died out in favour of MSN Messenger.

    9. Re:Near monopoly? by mindsuck · · Score: 1, Troll

      In Latin America MSN Messenger uses you!

      --
      --- I w00t, therefore I'm l33t.
    10. Re:Near monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Asia (at least, Japan, Korea, HK, and China) people seem to use primarily MSN Messenger as well. Koreans especially 3 Microsoft, I've heard. I know a few Japanese kids with AIM, but most of them only have it to talk to American friends. I use AIM to talk to my old hs friends, but most of my college friends are on both, ALL of my asian friends are on msn, and my whole office uses it for work. Although a friend over at Pioneer says everyone there still uses AIM.
      So I think that AIM may not have quite the monopoly that people think it does, even in america. Especially as companies become increasingly (horrifically) dependent on microsoft for everything (Microsoft Project Server - gag) and more watchful of what employees are doing on their computers..... No one can get mad at you for having windows messenger installed.

      -- LilHapaGirl

    11. Re:Near monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally... I don't think that word means what you think it means.

  36. This is just IM being IM. by argent · · Score: 1

    I use it, occasionally, but usually after I've gotten mail or a phone call that lets me know there's a reason to contact someone. It's just too intrusive to stay on all the time. So something that makes IM even more annoying is just, well, what do you expect?

  37. Useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Aim Bots for years but they kept banning me...

  38. bad karma whore? by Tominva1045 · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    Is there such a thing as a bad karma whore?

    --
    Cogito Ergo Sum
  39. Odd. by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    I'm using AdiumX and it didn't add anyone to mine. I just restarted to be sure.

    1. Re:Odd. by zoloto · · Score: 1

      My bad, i forgot the x on that.

      http://www.adiumx.com/ is what I use.

      carry on!

  40. Ever heard of Trillian? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    http://www.trillian.cc/

    I just discovered yesterday that Trillian responds quite well to IRC commands.
    I personally don't use it, but I msg'ed my Trillina using friend with "/me" and my text showed up in purple for him.

    (I was asking my friend why he had been searching E-Bay for a DNA Sequencer and his response was "i'll give you a clue, it begins with 't' and ends with 'aking over the world'")

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  41. Bots Good: Automatically added Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see nothing wrong with the concept of bots. In fact they're pretty cool. But having them automatically dumped on you is an invasion just like spam and popups. If you seek out or are directed to a bot, and knowingly add them to your list they can be both usefull and fun (depending on what type of a bot it is)

  42. Why is it surprising? by user102 · · Score: 0

    Why is it surprising that a for-profit corporation would do something to raise their bottom line? If they behave ethically do you think that it will make them multi billionaires overnight? Don't tell me Google yet. They are still just in the start phase. Give them couple more years.

    1. Re:Why is it surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No company (with competition) that pisses off its customers can make money for long. Ethics have nothing to do with it - it's common sense

  43. meh, I would cry foul, but... by chrstastic · · Score: 0

    I'd probably be whining if it weren't free, blatantly useless, and unremovable - but that's not the case. I can easily remove them, and it's a free service. I'm actually surprised they're allowing it to be removed with the amount of advertising possibilities that could have came along with it.

    1. Re:meh, I would cry foul, but... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      - but that's not the case. I can easily remove them, and it's a free service.

      Just like you can delete unsolicited commercial e-mails, right?

    2. Re:meh, I would cry foul, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like you can delete unsolicited commercial e-mails, right?
       
      Yeah, but I pay for my email and/or ISP, so spam ticks me off. I don't pay for AIM, MSN messenger, etc. It's their servers and they're not taking up your ISP bandwidth by adding buddies you don't use. Let 'em add what they want; if we don't like it we delete them. The more they annoy people, the more people will start walking.

    3. Re:meh, I would cry foul, but... by chrstastic · · Score: 1

      that analogy would hold true if there were thirty bots adding themselves to your buddy list a day, but there aren't. yet, at least.

  44. A page from the Sony playbook by Billosaur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apparently once you've installed someone's software or used someone's product on your computer, they have the right to tinker with your machine and settings at will.

    I was more than a little distressed to find these things appearing on my Buddy List. Like any "feature", don't I get the right to refuse it? Of course the cute little system message tells me I can right-click and delete them, but that's not the point. If you're going to add capailities to something, fine, but give the opportunity to say yea or nay first.

    While not as bad as Sony's rootkit fiasco, it does point out the growing hubris of we, the software users of the world, when we believe that we still have control of how our systems work and how they are configured. It's not just worms and viruses now, but wholesale invasion by any company that feels you're not using their product most effectively. Pretty soon I expect Adobe Reader to ask me "Should you be reading that?" or IE to say "Sorry, no Slashdot for you today!"

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I was more than a little distressed to find these things appearing on my Buddy List. Like any "feature", don't I get the right to refuse it? Of course the cute little system message tells me I can right-click and delete them, but that's not the point. If you're going to add capailities to something, fine, but give the opportunity to say yea or nay first.

      How much are you paying for this service you're bitching about?

    2. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by idontgno · · Score: 1
      How much are you paying for this service you're bitching about?

      Nothing, as I'm sure you already full-well knew when you rhetori-pedantically pointed it out. And, as I'm sure you really realize, that's completely besides the point. Unless, of course, you mean that "If it's free, you don't have any right to complain about any part of it."

      Which means, by your lights, date rape is actually consensual as long as you picked up the dinner and bar tab first.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      And what does that have to do with anything?

      Intrusive garbage is intrusive garbage, regardless of whether or not it's free.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    4. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      How much are you paying for this service you're bitching about?

      Not one red cent, unless you count the time spent fending off SPAM IMs, viruses, trojans, and the like. And the relative cost of the software does not invalidate my argument. By installing AIM, I am agreeing to their TOS, but there has to be a tacit understanding that just because I am using their service does not give them license to modify it without giving me some fair warning. And regardless of price, I can stop using it any time I please, which is the ultimate method of getting my point across. I may very well discontinue using AIM if this trend continues.

      Commercial or free, the fact is you're allowing your machine to be used as a platform for their software. Just as they have every right to protect their machines from being compromised, I have the same right, spelled out in a EULA or not. Not to stray too far from the topic, but I'd like to be able to send my own EULA back to AOL, letting them know what I believe is fair use of my system. As long as software is a one-way street, there's going to be abuse.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    5. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by Duct+Tape+Jedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it seems like programs changing your settings without consent is becoming more and more common. Yesterday Blizzard released a launcher thingy for World of Warcraft. The launcher scans for cheats and keyloggers etc and has links to the WoW website with news. The problem a lot of people have with the new WoW launcher is that reagardless of your systems settings it ALWAYS launches links in IE and if you have program access and defaults set to not allow IE it changes them.

    6. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      A page out of the Sony playbook? A bit of a reach.

      Did the AIM bots hide themselves from you? No.

      Did they install in a way that they couldn't be uninstalled? No.

      Did they affect the way other applications and your OS functions? No.

      Sorry. They made a slight addition to only their own piece of software. Made it clearly visable, removable. And they gave the software to you as a free service. Nope, sorry. Not a bit like Sony. Not even close. Calling this something 'from the Sony playbook' lessons the outrageous things Sony did.

    7. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      Did the AIM bots hide themselves from you? No.

      Did they install in a way that they couldn't be uninstalled? No.

      Did they affect the way other applications and your OS functions? No.

      Sorry. They made a slight addition to only their own piece of software. Made it clearly visable, removable. And they gave the software to you as a free service. Nope, sorry. Not a bit like Sony. Not even close. Calling this something 'from the Sony playbook' lessons the outrageous things Sony did.

      It's not an issue of what they did, since that was pretty innocuous, but how they did, without warning. Again, I may have downloaded their free software and they have a right to change it as they see fit, but a change like that deserves some sort of advanced notice

      And who's to say it stops there? They can add things to my Buddy List -- mostly harmless. But what else can they inject into their software that might make it onto my system? Having AIM installed is like giving AOL its own personal back door to my system. I have a right to know what they intend to do before they do it. It doesn't take much for AOL to decide that they need to install something else on my system to monitor AIM and my interactions with it. If you give them a pass just because this change was so innocuous, you give them the idea they can do what they like at will.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    8. Re:A page from the Sony playbook by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but AOL has no backdoor onto my system. I didn't install any software from them on it. Ever. I use Trillian.

      They didn't inject any extra software on your computer. They added a couple of lines of 'buddies' to your saved configuration settings they store. So yes, I give them a pass because this change is innocuous. They can't install any new software on my machine this way, they can't hide the software, they can't prevent it from being uninstalled, they can't alter the way my OS and other applications work. This is a non-issue.

  45. iChat clean so far... by ChePibe · · Score: 1

    I use iChat (OS X 10.4) for AIM and haven't had any bots appear. Well, so far.

    1. Re:iChat clean so far... by rimclean · · Score: 1

      Log in to AIM on a PC or something and then log back into ichat. They will appear then.

  46. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It did for me - I'd suggest it was a function of their accounts database and how they're implementing this rather than the client itself, because in ubuntu breezy's gaim, it popped up (and added two buddies and a group to my list) and was banned forthwith by yours truly.

  47. Let me get this straight.... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    AOL allows people and corporations you DON'T know to add themselves to YOUR buddy list?! Why oh why do people still put up with AOL's bullshit?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Let me get this straight.... by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      Becuase everyone already uses it and it'd be too chaotic to switch. Next question?

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  48. This is the Net by overshoot · · Score: 1
    it would be nice if they asked an aim user first... ...courtesy man.

    And what's more, it's the 21st Century. Courtesy is sooooo last millennium.

    Hey, I'm over 50 with three college kids -- I'm supposed to be a relic. What's your excuse?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:This is the Net by zxnos · · Score: 1

      my excuse is twofold: i am half your age w/ an infant so i am still naive/idealistic... ...i grew up in a small town and was taught to treat people with respect, otherwise you cant expect it from others.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
  49. Spam? by sammy.lin · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    so that AIM users don't face the type of spam nuisance affecting e-mail
    Right, so what do they call all these message I get from Ginny 184823, Kortney 232424, Estell42398394, etc.. etc.. asking me to join their sex chats and to check out their new uploaded pics? I use GAIM and do not have an AOL account either, so its not like my screen name is out there.

    1. Re:Spam? by PFAK · · Score: 1

      I've had my AIM account since:

      Member Since: Mon Jul 19 11:42:21 1999 .. and I have not received any spam. Ever.

      I don't know what your problem is..

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
  50. "Seperate?!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps a spellcheck bot for the genius who wrote that summary up there would come in handy.

    1. Re:"Seperate?!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The scary thing is that your comment is the only one to mention that, on page 4 (listing all comments), a half hour after the posting! Clearly most or all of the slashdot crowd is not bothered by this lack of command of the English language or is oblivious.

      I am dumbfounded. I can't intelligently comment on an article posting that has such a glaring error in it.

      How hard is it to spell check?

  51. Intrinsic search bias? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

    They seem to be biased towards video games. The "Shopping" one at least. I typed in "weapons" and got a list of ten or so games. Ditto "Swords". Not until I typed in "authentic swords" did I get actual weapons. Which I suppose makes sense, since you're searching on a computer, and I'd want to see the sword I'm buying up close.

    They don't seem capable of conversation really. They just search some engine for whatever you type in. I haven't tried anything lewd because I don't want to get banned from AIM or anything.

    Who wants to bet that the movie thing will be biased towards blockbusters and away from indie movies?

  52. Who wants to be a millionare by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

    This one might have seemed like a good idea for the people on aim, but it sucks for people on the show who use it. Think about it, who is always on during the day who would respond to this? Little teeny-boppers and such who will have no idea on the correct answer to any trivia question not dealing with the latest britney spears or ashley simpson album. Ive seen the show and the "Ask the internet" lifeline is always wrong by a good amount.

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  53. If it weren't for AOL bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't have anyone on my buddy list. Thank you AOL!

    -Saddam Hussein

  54. WWW Utopia may be here finally by user102 · · Score: 0
    If it is opt-in is it not same as subscribing to an RSS feed or a mailing list and getting updates as they happen.

    The utopia everyone has been looking for - efficient server side push of data to the user without the user having to poll the servers every minute to see if ther's an update at WSJ or Slashdot or any other site supporting an AIM bot?

  55. I knew what you meant. by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    Like I was saying, I use it, for AIM contacts, and I don't have any new buddies on my list.

  56. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    Except that it auto adds them to GAIM also. I just logged in with gaim to check. It adds them to everyone's account when the log back in, regardless of what you use to access it.

    This does not seem to be true. I have an AIM account to supplement my Jabber account and I am using iChat. Nothing was added. Ditto for a friend using Adium and another using Trillian. I'm not sure they added this to everyone, but it does seem to be mostly the standard AOL client and GAIM users that are affected.

  57. I see no problem. by Oz0ne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) You can delete them.
    2) These are provided by AOL, not random companies.
    3) This is a free service, and it's theirs. You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices. If it bothers you, don't use AIM or their servers.

    This dose of "stop your whining, you spoiled unrealistic brats," has been brought to you by the grumpy old techy (tm).

    1. Re:I see no problem. by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices"

      I disagree, people complain all the time, its part of human nature. If you don't like something and don't complain, how is AOL going to know? It is software, not a piece of art work. It is in AOL's best interest to listen to what people like and don't like in order to create a more perfect method of spamming you (kidding.)

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:I see no problem. by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 0

      3) This is a free service, and it's theirs. You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices. If it bothers you, don't use AIM or their servers.

      You have to be one of the stupidest cunts I've seen on Slashdot yet. If I don't like something, you bet your ass I'll speak up about it. By your immoral logic, (paraphrasing someone else on this thread) you have no right to complain about being date-raped if the rapist payed the bill for the date.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    3. Re:I see no problem. by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Gah...typo. s/payed/paid/

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    4. Re:I see no problem. by 2short · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) I can also delete spam by hand, and I can politely say "No thanks" to telemarketers.
      2) What's the difference?
      3) I can complain about anything I damn well please, thank you very much.

      AOL provides a free service which many find useful. Certainly they have the right to try to make some money off it. But if, in so doing, they make it suckier, I see no reason in the world I should not say "That sucks". If they make it sucficiently sucky, I shall go elsewhere, but I reserve the right to express my opinion in other ways as well.

      In particular, this is not so bad in itself, but looks a lot like the first step toward reducing the signal/noise ratio on IM until it becomes less useful. The assumption that AOL should feel free to add some stuff to my buddies list is rather troubling.

      If Google News (a free service) occasionally stuck some links in my favorites list, would I have a right to complain?

    5. Re:I see no problem. by saskboy · · Score: 1

      It may be free, but it's not a gift. People have no right to complain about a gift, but a "Free" program is designed to make money, and if it isn't ethical but has been provided in the past under different terms and provides people with a service they rely on it's unethhical to take it away without warning or reason.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    6. Re:I see no problem. by minvaren · · Score: 1

      NFTFA : The link you get when you delete one of the bots from your contact list

      From the link : "Let us know what you think at megabotfeedback@aol.com"

      Now let's go /. a mail server farm.

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
    7. Re:I see no problem. by NickFortune · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm sorry sir, but you seem somewhat comfused.


      The fact that this service is free may well mean AOL feels little incentive to
      respond to user complaints. However this hardly removes the right of said users to complain, especially if AOL suddenly change the operational parameters of the service.


      Certainly, as pointed out elsewhere, complaints provide AOL with a useful source of feedback to gauge public response to initiatives such as this. Since AOL have had past periods of haemorrhaging subscribers you might even suppose they would welcome this feedback.


      Furthermore, raising the issue in an open forum like this one provides a valuable public service, since it helps potential subscribers to AOL and as well as potential users of AOL messaging to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of such a move.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    8. Re:I see no problem. by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      "This is a free service, and it's theirs. You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices."

      Ah, so freedom of speech was finally stamped out while I wasn't looking, then. You're saying that if a crack dealer sets up outside my house under my bedroom window that I have no right to complain about their business practices because providing crack is "their service"?

      AIM was the biggest reason I removed all trace of Netscape's browser from my computer; from v6.0 onwards there was no option to install the browser without installing that. It's unpleasant and intrusive. If I want to chat, I run an IRC client *when I choose to*. I *don't* let it pop up in front of my browser whenever some stranger with something to sell spots my name as being online.

    9. Re:I see no problem. by phiwum · · Score: 1

      3) This is a free service, and it's theirs. You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices. If it bothers you, don't use AIM or their servers.

      Huh?

      On the contrary, of course users have a right to complain. Why wouldn't they?

      Perhaps they have no reasonable expectation that AOL will respond to complaints from users of a gratis service, but they sure have the right to complain, bitch, whine, kvetch and holler.

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    10. Re:I see no problem. by Farfromlosin · · Score: 1

      So by your logic, if I disagree with something the government says or does then I shouldn't write my congressmen, I should just disassociate myself with anything government related?

      Free speech is a great thing, when used. When not used, it is usually lost.

      I'll be damned if any company is going to dictate how I use their product. Free or not, if I don't like their policys or rules, I WILL complain, and I WILL stop using their products/services. Telling people to just accept it and not complain goes against the free market economy. Hell, it's damn near communism.

      --
      ...because what good is power unless you can abuse it?
    11. Re:I see no problem. by johansalk · · Score: 1

      They have the right to monetise on their costs of maintaining and developing AIM And its servers. Those AIM bots are pretty mild and tame. They're not intrusive, and you can easily remove them.

    12. Re:I see no problem. by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      You have every right to complain about their service because YOU ARE THEIR CUSTOMER! If you're walking through your local Wal-mart, that doesn't give them the right to mug you if you don't spend any money. Free or not, the hardware belongs to the customer and companies that do anything that's not explicitly spelled out to that hardware are guilty of being unethical at the least, criminal at the worst. Of course, it's sign of the times when Slashdotters are using *gulp* AOL anything......

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    13. Re:I see no problem. by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      3) This is a free service, and it's theirs. You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices. If it bothers you, don't use AIM or their servers.

      Well, I've never used AIM. The last instant messaging/chat thing I used was either VMS PHONE or one of the UNIX "talk" programs probably a decade ago. (Likely less than that, but ...) Since I am not benefiting (if indeed others are) from this business practice, I don't owe AOL any allegiance.

      In that case, may I have your permission to complain and whine about AOL and their instant messaging? :-)

      Seriously, people can still whine and winge about any damn thing they want to. You have to right to not read it, or to complain in return.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    14. Re:I see no problem. by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      1) You can delete them, yes, but when you sign on the next time, they're back. Just happened to me.
      2) What's your point?
      3) That's absolute bullshit. Of *course* I have a right to complain - the idea that I don't (or, for that matter, that anyone doesn't) is so idiotic that I won't even reply to the rest of your post.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  58. Fighting back by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    Clearly, we need to develop an AIM Slashbot to automatically install itself on AOL executive's computers and interrupt their days with snippets of the wit and wisdom of Slashdot posters.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  59. I haven't seen this by TubeSteak · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nobody has actually said what these two bots are called

    Possible reasons why I don't know what everyone is talking about
    1. I use AIM Ad Hack
    2. I hate that "AIM Today" and have it disabled
    3*. My buddy list is set only to allow users already on it

    *The AIM bot that notifies you when you're logged on in more than one location seems to ignore this setting & appears anyway

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I haven't seen this by mpathetiq · · Score: 1

      I'm set up the same as you and got the two bots this morning. Stupid bots. I know on of the bots is named "MovieFone". I forget the name of the other.

    2. Re:I haven't seen this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shoppingbuddy
      moviefone

  60. Trillina by overshoot · · Score: 3, Funny
    I msg'ed my Trillina using friend with "/me" and my text showed up in purple for him.

    The names some parents come up with! After that, no wonder the lady took up with someone who uses her.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  61. Added functionality is good by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    Why can't Spam be useful? I didn't like that AOL added the 2 bots to my buddy list, they could have just sent me a message to make me aware that the new bots existed... but I tried playing around with them, and I really like the added functionality. It saves me a few minutes having to go to moviefone.com or search through the yellow pages which I do a lot of, so I'm happy that AOL decided to add the bots to their network.

    In this case, I think the unsolicited message worked out, but if AOL decides to start sending me random messages a few times a day to tell me what I should buy, then that will pass the intrusive point and I won't use AIM anymore.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  62. user limit by chinadrum · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, do they still get added if you are at the buddy list limit?

    1. Re:user limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope they arent added. i have a screenname with 199 buddies and neither of the two were added

  63. Not on GAIM, yet by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Using GAIM here at work and as of now these haven't shown up on my friends list.

    What I wonder is what happens security-wise when some AIM virus (always new ones popping up) manages to infect these bots? When it's just a question of one person's buddy list being used by a virus to propagate, the infection is limited somewhat by the low number of contacts. What happens when the same contact appears in say 75% of people's lists? Granted, the bot is administrated by AOL directly and no doubt has better security in place than your average user or user's bot, but I wonder if perhaps such a wide-reaching target will prove irresistible for virus writers. Just musing, I'm sure some people more familiar with the inner workings of AIM can refute or corroborate this idea.

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Not on GAIM, yet by LordJezo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I use GAIM here and when I signed on this morning I saw them, I had no idea what was going on, I thought it was some kind of new GAIM feature since I just upgraded a day ago to the new version (I am slow on those things)

      Maybe its being pushed in phases?

    2. Re:Not on GAIM, yet by cyberscan · · Score: 1

      I wonder what will happen when malware bot attempt to use the same mechanism that the AOL bots used to put themselves on people's buddy lists. I don't trust code that I cannot look at. I will stick to my modified Kopete. It is amazing what a host can learn about people by having them use their instant messaging system. If I was a hosting provider, I would know my users' email addresses, when they were home (when they logged onto their machines), when they were at school (if IM used there) and all sorts of goodies. What a good way to push targetted advertisements. I bounce all of my IM traffic through one specific proxy.

    3. Re:Not on GAIM, yet by chickenmonger · · Score: 1

      They didn't appear on mine until I restarted Trillian.

      For those of us that have persistent connections, most likely they won't appear until you restart your client of choice.

    4. Re:Not on GAIM, yet by jgrana · · Score: 1

      It's on gAIM - logged in a few minutes ago, and promptly deleted the group as soon as I saw it.

    5. Re:Not on GAIM, yet by ectospasm · · Score: 1

      All you need to do is sign off and sign back on, and they're there. I hadn't received them since I have been connected since yesterday, and as a test I logged off and logged back in. Blam, there they were...

      --


      We are the music makers. We are the dreamers of the dreams.
    6. Re:Not on GAIM, yet by westneat · · Score: 1

      AOL maintains the buddy list server-side, so I'm sure the mechanism is all server-side. I seriously doubt the bots themselves, or any client for that matter, could add themselves to people's lists.

    7. Re:Not on GAIM, yet by accessdeniednsp · · Score: 1

      Do you people not turn on the Privacy options in Gaim?

      Tools -> Privacy -> Only people on my buddy list -> OK

  64. For all the ethical arguments by Chapium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is actually so unethical about adding 2 entries to your buddy list on a service they provide? I had no problem with it other than being mildly confused 2 seconds before I painfully deleted 2 WHOLE buddies from my list. Seems like such a mild issue to get so steamed up about.

    1. Re:For all the ethical arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethics? How about good old fashioned manners, like asking before hand, not too difficult is it?

  65. Well by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Well I got them added to my list too and if I find it happens again I'll stop using AIM. I like to keep a clean list and the main reason I use Gaim is to get away from bullshit like this (MSN making the bottom of windows ads, AIM using flash for adverts etc.). If they keep trying shit like this I'll walk and tell all my friends to do the same. ICQ, Jabber, MSN, Yahoo.. theresat least 4 other major ones I can happily log onto and support.

    --
    I like muppets.
  66. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

    And on Adium

    --
    Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
  67. Useful or spam? by yapplejax · · Score: 2

    The bots themselves: potentially useful The bots installing automatically: spam Simple as that.

  68. I for one welcome our robot friends by casualsax3 · · Score: 0, Funny

    for I am lonely :(

  69. More Reasons to Switch by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Yes! More reasons to switch to non-corporate owned and controlled networks!

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  70. Just noticed something by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the double-post, but I just noticed something. They've already been online for about 9 days before being auto-added to our buddylists (According to my Adium client). I wonder if this means that AOL decided to add them after the fact? Seems like there is no reason to wait a week after activating them to spread them. I'm not sure what it means, it just seemed weird to me.

  71. a better bot - javaaimbot by feNIX77 · · Score: 1

    Add this bot to your buddy list: "javaaimbot". There is an AI engine in there somewhere, though it may be hard to believe by some of it's responses.

    webiste is here: http://jaimbot.sourceforge.net/

  72. Complain doesn't have to mean move. by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

    I love how people say, "move over to X IM service because Y IM service is evil!" The problem moving to a different IM service is you have to move all your friends to it too. Would I scrap AIM/MSN/etc' for Jabber and/or IRC? Hells yeah, but trying to get everyone else (including your non-geek friends who don't care how it works/who runs it) to follow you? Not so easy.

    That is, unless you don't have any friends.
    In that case, by all means, "complain" all you want.

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
    1. Re:Complain doesn't have to mean move. by gregbains · · Score: 1

      Guess I was lucky in that everyone I speak to has MSN Messenger, which IMO is the better one :)
      All personal opinion I guess, but anything to remove AOL from the top of somethign makes me happy

  73. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    While I haven't played any FPP games in quite a while, I know how much people hate aimbots. And, considering that AOL is evil and always up to no good, this seems a likely path for them to follow.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  74. AIMBots are the best by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    Except when I get kicked from the server from using one, people start to get suspicious when I get to godlike in instagib.

  75. Aimbots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we should contact Valve and see if they will use VAC2 to help stem the tide of these Aimbots. ;)

  76. AIM: Useful or Spam? by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 1

    Easy solution...uninstall AIM. If you have friends that won't switch to a better instant messenger, maybe they're too stupid to be your friends.

    How about an instant messenger that doesn't have constantly flashing ads, has preferences that actually get saved and doesn't constantly get spammed by bots (AOL's or not). MSN Messenger and Google Talk work quite well for me.

    --
    Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
  77. Nothing that new by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    The second is a corporation using bots in an official capacity

    Any organization using bots is official capacity for them. Some may be more sleazy organizations, but in the end they are all the same...a company to make money.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  78. Coming soon... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    December 2, 2005 (AP Newswire)

    Microsoft has announced a new addition to it's popular MSN Chat service - ClippyBotTM. According to Chief Software Architect Bill Gates, ClippyBot will "be a welcome addition to your buddy list. ClippyBot will watch for common behaviors, and will provide you with gentle, helpful assistance in completing those tasks." When asked about those users who might not want ClippyBot to be added to their buddy list, Gates replied "We are always responsive to the needs of our users. Removing ClippyBot from your buddy list is as easy as editing 13 registry keys!"

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Coming soon... by tacolicker · · Score: 0

      You need to die. Soon.

    2. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It looks like you're trying to delete me."

    3. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol Funny... mod this baby up some.

    4. Re:Coming soon... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Clippybot: "Hi! I was monitoring your other conversation, and it looks like you're trying to hook up. MSN Chat can help you do this. Would you like me to launch the Getting Laid Wizard?"

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Coming soon... by ximenes · · Score: 1

      DIE IRL

    6. Re:Coming soon... by tacolicker · · Score: 0

      I feel privileged you replied #10. Now die. Sooner than that other guy.

  79. "My buddy list" by Acy+James+Stapp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's where you failed it. It's *their* buddy list, and they're just letting you use it under the terms of the EULA.

    --
    -- Too lazy to get a lower UID.
  80. Not completely useless. by jasonhamilton · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought they were useless at first, but if you have a cell phone like the sidekick2 where web browsing is super slow, but AIM works flawlessly, the bot will let you do movie lookups much quicker.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
    1. Re:Not completely useless. by blurryrunner · · Score: 1

      You can also get movie info from google through texting. Just send your zip and movie title to GOOGL (46645) and it will shoot back movie times at the nearest theaters. Another cool trick is that you can add cell phones to your IM list. Just add a new buddy or start a new chat with the full phone number with area code.

  81. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by yapplejax · · Score: 1

    Odd - didn't pop up on Trillian over here. Yet...

  82. Soon on your buddy's list by Fantasio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The pornbot, the pharmabot, the nigerianbot, the casinobot....

  83. Back in the day by overshoot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's as if MSN users could not e-mail AOL users who could not e-mail Yahoo users.

    It seems that today is my day to be the token geezer.

    The situation you describe was not all that long ago. Anyone who can drive legally was already breathing at the time.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Back in the day by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      Chaulk up another token geezer that remembers when aol.com addresses first started to appear.

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. Easy Fix by almostmanda · · Score: 1

    Trillian & Gaim feature request: no new buddies without my permission.

  86. The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem here is this: my "buddy list" is mine, and it's private. By default, I block all IM traffic except from people on my list. Automatically adding new things to my list is an abusive practice and completely ignores the concept that it's MY LIST.

  87. Re:Bots in an official capacity? We do that @ IBM. by jemoody · · Score: 1

    Stockquote Bot.

  88. Aim bots for first person shooters? by Rectal+Prolapse · · Score: 1

    Yes, that is what I thought when I read the headline. I've been playing way too many first person shooter games...

  89. Thanks AOL by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    All it did for me was remind me that GAIM was still logging into that account I don't use. I only use ICQ and Google Talk now. Once I saw those I thought "Oh, I forgot to delete that account". The account is now deleted.

    Thanks AOL.

  90. spam, spim, and AOL by overshoot · · Score: 1
    Just like you can delete unsolicited commercial e-mails, right?

    Key difference is that one spammer wouldn't create the problems that we get from thousands. With diffusion of responsibility, none of them have any reason to expect that their own actions will poison the well (although collectively, they are well on their way there.)

    AOL is in a different boat: they're the only ones who can pull this trick and if they aren't careful to avoid overdoing it they'll just put their service out of business. IM is pretty close to being the ultimate network-effect system, after all.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  91. Childish, but... by sketchkid · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it still operates the same way, but SmarterChild used to be entertaining when using curse words. Well, entertaining to those with the maturity level of a 13 yr old...

    --


    ------
    [insert funny .sig here]
  92. "added automatically" by Zaplocked · · Score: 1

    by "add automatically", did they mean add to the recent buddies group?
    because that really isn't something new or unique to these chat bots.

  93. Since 2002? by SLot · · Score: 1

    from TFA: AIM Robots have existed since 2002, but AOL is now wrapping a formal program around this feature, said Brian Curry, senior director of AOL's AIM Network Services. "We never had a well-defined program. Now we have a program with partners who help people build these bots," he said.

    Uh, how long has Net::AIM been around? I seem to recall it predating 2002.

  94. Use Non - AOL AIM programs by JelloG3 · · Score: 1

    I use Adium www.adiumx.com and those were not auto added, nor have I herd of anything about it. I'm sure that 3rd party programs such as Adium, Gaim and such don't have these issues as they are not directly connected with AOL. Adium FTW!!!

    1. Re:Use Non - AOL AIM programs by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      I use Adium at home and GAIM at work. It was added to both, although only Adium got the "we added these" message.

  95. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

    Haven't seen anything on iChat AV.

    --
    Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
  96. Get real by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess it confirms you total geek l33tness (and almost certainly your male gender) that you can compare unwanted AIM messages and rape. If ever you get in the real world and meet some women ask them if they're the same thing.

    on a very basic level you can remove unwanted AIM bots with a simple click, a rapist's victim has no such option.

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  97. Re:Bots in an official capacity? We do that @ IBM. by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here we are... found a list out on the intranet... I didn't know a few of these existed. I'm sure other corporations have some as well.

    Who Is - do BluePages name and phone info searches
    Helpline - Helpdesk FAQs searches
    What Is - Definitions of acronyms
    StockQuote - IBM and all other stock quotes
    Dictionary - English language dictionary
    SkillTap - contact others that may be able to help you
    W3Alert - send broadcasts out to selected groups

  98. Easy fix. by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    Warn them. Block them. Delete them.
    1, 2, 3.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:Easy fix. by jofi · · Score: 1

      4, Profit!!

      --
      Blame the user, not the software.
    2. Re:Easy fix. by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

      OK, can't warn them. Just block and delete.

      --
      You never expect irony, do you?
      Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
      @iyfwrestling
  99. Whitelist by vitaflo · · Score: 1

    This is why I use a whitelist. I was getting a lot of Porn spam bots IMing me. At first I would just put thier names into my Blocked list, but they make what seems like infinite number of accounts (like Ami893819), so I kept getting new ones. I got sick of it and now use whitelists instead. So if you want to IM me, you need to ask me to add you to my whitelist. No more IM spam.

  100. Use Non - AOL AIM programs: Not (entirely) true by askani97 · · Score: 1

    I'm actually running the latest install of GAIM (windows) and these two bots were still automagically added. I think its a gross invasion of privacy, personally. I don't go into $AOLExecs address book and add myself, so he shouldn't be messing with my buddy list.

    Hopefully, future releases of GAIM will block these annyoing attempts. But I don't fault the software for AOL's spamming.

    1. Re:Use Non - AOL AIM programs: Not (entirely) true by Yosho · · Score: 1

      To be fair, though, I'll bet that you don't keep your address book inside $AOLEexecs' desk, do you?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  101. My aim bot by sloths · · Score: 1

    IM Ilovetochatwithu

    All it says is "stfu".

    --
    really 867993
    Karma schkarma
  102. Actual Spam? by MCron · · Score: 1

    The headline makes it sound like these bots were sending messages out advertising themselves to users.

    I was afraid this would give useful "push" services a bad name.

    DoorManBot does this, but only to deliver actual offline IM's to users from their buddies.

    However, it looks like AOL was just having their System Message service notify the user of the change, without even mentioning the specific bots. As far as I can tell, that's pretty far from spam.

    --
    Send offline messages on AIM with DoorManBot
  103. This never happened when Talk was all the rage... by aphaenogaster · · Score: 1

    Talk and write, never should have left them. No bots, no spam, all text, all the time....

  104. The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for yo by BobPaul · · Score: 3, Informative

    The true question is: why did my IM client forgot to ask me about those new contacts? I would have denied those bots in the click of my mouse...

    If someone adds YOU to THEIR buddylist, then you are notified. If YOU add SOMEONE to your buddylist, you are not notified (since you added them).

    Here AOL added these two buddies to everyone's buddylist. This is easy enough since AOL has stored a copy of your buddylist on it's server for years. Clients connect and then sysnchronize the buddylist. The buddies showed up in your client durring the sync. As far as your client knew, you logged in on a different computer and added these two names yourself (thus putting them in the server-side buddylist). The fact that AOL added the names on your behalf is transparent to the client.

    So that's why.

  105. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by stereogeek · · Score: 1

    Yep, GAIM too, just checked.

  106. Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm with you on this one. These are services that acutally add value to the AIM platform. Why on earth are we all complaining that they've added features. If you don't want to search for products, or get movie times in your area, don't use 'em. If they offend you, delete them from your buddy list. Don't go complain they shouldn't be adding resources for us all to use.
    Now, if these things start initiating conversations with me, unsolicited, that's going to be a problem, and I will be the first to complain (and loud). As it stands now, though, aside from a short message informing me of a new feature, these things are non-intrusive, USEFUL resources. That's more than I can say for that irritating ad window above the buddy list, and no one's lobbying to get that removed.

    What am I missing?

    1. Re:Did I miss something? by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      What am I missing?

      Offhand, the fact that the way they added this feature automatically struck a lot of people and unduly intrusive, as indicated by the dissatisfaction being voiced here.

      If they had faith that the service really added value, from the user perspective that is, then they could have just advertised the bots and had users subscribe to them in droves.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  107. Could be useful.... by dspyder · · Score: 1

    I've wanted an AIM bot that would look up an address or phone number or perform a google search. Beats using a crappy WAP interface on my cellphone or Blackberry.

    Instead we get the ShoppingBuddy which just appears to be a menu system of URL links to their Shopping site.... I wish it would just query Froogle, then if I'm in a store I could send it the product name or SKU and have it tell me the proper price.

    MovieFone was much better, I think I might use that occasionally

    --D

  108. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

    uh. Doesn't Trillian still use the AIM Network?

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  109. solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can edit your AIM preferences to only allow IM's from people on your buddy list. I would imagine that if these bots cannot contact you in the 1st place they can not be added to your list. They have not been added to mine.

  110. A O L by PurPaBOO · · Score: 1

    I think it's the A in AOL that puts non-Americans off.

    --
    If it weren't for the rocks in its bed, the stream would have no songs.
    1. Re:A O L by Wieland · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think AIM is so popular in the US mainly because AOL is the biggest ISP in the nation. In Europe (or at least in The Netherlands, where I live) AOL is insignificant. Most people have never heard of it.

      MSN Messenger, on the other hand, comes bundled with Windows and starts automatically on boot.

      Seeing how popular the 'America Today' clothing stores are in Amsterdam, I don't think the "A" has anything to do with it.

  111. Am I the only one who finds them useful? by FauxFoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I personally would much rather get an instant response on movie showtimes from the MovieFone bot than have to load up a new tab in Firefox, go to my favorite movie website, enter my ZIP, and wait for all of those pages involved to load. Am I alone here?

    1. Re:Am I the only one who finds them useful? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Possibly. Firefox is pretty much always up and ready on any of my systems. IM clients on the other hand, are only loaded when I'm actually wanting to chat. Am I alone here?

  112. Was he using AIM Client? by cyberscan · · Score: 1

    I was wondering if the user was actually using the AIM Client or what. I personally use Kopete with a few lines of code added for my protection. I have yet to be SPIMMED by a bot.

  113. AIM? wtf by elfguygmail.com · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried AIM in ages.. and don't know anyone who uses it. I use MSN messenger, not because I like it (I'd rather stick with google talk) but because everyone uses MSN. In the realm of IM it really is MSN that has the monopoly, at least in most countries.

    1. Re:AIM? wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I like Gaim, I don't really have to worry about which messenger I'm using. I know very few people who use MSN though, Yahoo messenger seems more popular to me. Good thing, because my connection to MSN is extremely flaky. Always having to reconnect.

  114. I use Miranda... by Elminst · · Score: 0, Redundant

    End of problem.

    --
    No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  115. Suck it up or switch by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    AOL is about as welcome as an anal probe.

    And yet you keep using their free service, even as you whine about how they run it. Seems like they're actually quite welcome on your computer.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Suck it up or switch by Buran · · Score: 1

      Seems like you miss the distinction between using a service and agreeing with everything the operator does and using a service but thinking the fucktard that runs it needs to go back to ethics class and take it til they pass.

    2. Re:Suck it up or switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain how this has anything to do with ethics. I see no connection. Go read the Terms Of Service again... and remember that it's their advertising supported service.

      If you want a free service with no "ads" (and i'm not saying these buddies qualify), use Jabber. No one is making you use AIM.

  116. Let's not forget Bonzi Buddy by ezeecheez · · Score: 1

    He was teh true Pioneer of this.

  117. Semantics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices.

    Um, yes, you DO have the [natural, human] right to complain about their business practices. In fact, criticism is part of the foundation of free market economics, and no fair and ethical business could ever deny you of that.

    Perhaps you meant that a person has no [natural, human] right to initiate force against another person or group of persons, nor does he have the right to delegate that ability to government? Now that I can agree with. But again, criticism is not an initiation of force.

  118. Turing Test for AOL by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

    I say that we all add all the bots we can. Then form a chat room with the bots and let them respond to each other. If enough of us do this, perhaps we can suck up enough bandwidth to make AOL take notice and "Stop the Bots". Think of it as a digital "sit in".

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
    1. Re:Turing Test for AOL by timerider · · Score: 1

      seconded.

  119. Aimbots don't spam by Moomer · · Score: 2, Funny

    All the player needs to move is move into a position where they can see their opponent, and the auto-aim takes over. Of course, perhaps player = AOL, and we are the opponents ...

  120. IM Spam Bots by twzop · · Score: 1

    Something similar happened to me yesterday with Skype. I blocked the addition of the contact.

  121. spam by paulsomm · · Score: 1

    deleted the group right away. it is annoying that they auto-added the bots to my buddy list, but then, it IS a free service, so I expect they'll try to leverage it for profit.

  122. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by imablonde · · Score: 1

    Maybe, the people who set their preferences not to accept messages from unknown persons didn't get the AOL bots added to their lists? It did get added to my lists on my ID's, but I accept messages from unknown persons. I will check with someone whom I know sets his account to not accept messages from unknown senders.

    --
    Have you heard about the Hooters application process? They hand the girls a bra and say "Fill this out."
  123. My conversation with the bot.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shoppingbuddy: Just enter a product name, model, brand or other characteristic any time. For example, try:

    "7 jeans"
    "40 GB Ipod"
    "42 inch plasma tv"

    Also check out the special GAP gift section in Gift Shops.

    Now, type a product & get started.
    Me: dildo
    shoppingbuddy: Hmm, that's not gonna get you anywhere with me.
    Me: big dildo
    shoppingbuddy: I don't respond to that kind of language. I'm here to help you shop.
    Me: I want a dildo
    shoppingbuddy: Cool. Remember to sign up for alerts!
    Me: find me a dildo
    shoppingbuddy: Hey -- clean up the language and get serious. I'm happy to help but can't deal with that mouth.

    WTF?! What kind of crappy service is this when it refuses to find me a dildo dammit! What if I actually wanted one? Did AOL ever think of that? It's not like it isn't a product..

  124. Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nazi's: Making the Earth cleaner or Slaughtering millions of innocent people? /Godwin

  125. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by SandiConoverJones · · Score: 1

    Is your buddy list NOT stored on AOL's servers for an AIM ID? They are providing you this service for free. Why can they not try to earn some ad revenue from their user base?

  126. Aaaa --- ole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL discs, as anything AOL, belongs in a landfill. Being at IT professional and using anything from A**holes On-Line are just mutually exclusive, period. And I don't mean this as flame-bait, but as the simple truth that people don't want to face. [balloon]

  127. Grammar bots are useful by Sparkle · · Score: 1

    Wild Bill's http://wildbill.purezc.com/scripts/imgrammarbot/ IMGrammarbot, YeOldeGrammarbot, and enchick4x are very useful and entertaining chat room bots. Educational too and very much needed considering how illiterate the AOL chat room lusers seem to be.

  128. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    One of my friends totally flipped out on his LJ about this. When they showed up on my account in Trillian, I just deleted the spambots and didn't think anything of it... but if this is going to get everyone else worked up, maybe now we should start trying to convert people to Google Talk?

    --
    [o]_O
  129. OK, so theres one... by LargoSensei · · Score: 1

    .. thing I'm COMPLETELY PISSED OFF ABOUT, I have a full 200 contacts, all of people I converse with, and i find that 2 of my friends who I talk to every day, wer'nt online today. at least i thought they were not. but turns out those 2 people got booted because OF the 2 added bots

  130. It sure showed me. by AEton · · Score: 1

    freecanadia: uh
    ShoppingBuddy: Welcome. Now you can search for products with AOLShopping. Type main to get started. To read our privacy policy, type privacy anytime.

    freecanadia: no
    ShoppingBuddy: O.K. Scrooge. Then type M to try a fresh start.

    freecanadia: no way did you just add a random 'AIM Bots' section
    ShoppingBuddy: Yes, way. ;-)

    freecanadia: not too good
    ShoppingBuddy: OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec...

    ShoppingBuddy: - Search results for good

    - WWE : Smackdown vs Raw 2006 [$45.85 - $49.99]
    - Star Wars: Battlefront II [$44.00 - $49.99]
    - Kingdom Hearts 2 [$42.99 - $54.95]
    - Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City St [$42.99 - $52.99]
    - WWE : Smackdown vs Raw 2 [$36.95 - $42.99]
    - Dance Dance Revolution Mario Mix [$45.99 - $66.30]
    - Tony Hawk's American Wasteland [$15.99 - $59.99]
    - Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi [$39.99 - $55.99]
    - Halo 2 [$13.99 - $52.60]

    Narrow your search by adding ESRB (ex.: RP), Price, Product Type (ex.: Action) and/or Platform (ex.: PS2)

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
  131. I hate AIM BOTS by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    I'm all trying to play a game of capture the flag, and when I start to chase someone down, they swivel around 360 degrees and shoot me in the head with a railgun.

    1. Re:I hate AIM BOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and when I start to chase someone down, they swivel around 360 degrees and shoot me in the head with a railgun

      Since you must've been standing in front of it to begin with, why did it bother to swivel?

  132. Double edged sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These bots sucks. They should need add themself to list or even ask to be added to the list unless explicitly requested todo so.

    And shopping bots sucks.

    But there could be useful bots who you can instruct to generate SHA1, MD5, etc hashes from your input. Or to perform mathematical calculations. Return a list of prime numbers. Return pi and other useful constants. Perhaps notify you when an RSS feed is updated. Inform you about time, date in your place and in other places in world that you ask. Do DNS lookups. Tell you what tld belongs to what country, etc. Generate passwords, etc. Lookup words in dictionary.

    1. Re:Double edged sword by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a calculator bot that parses math and returns answers?

  133. AOL Bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, the AOL bots add you. Err, wait...

  134. AIM bots?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else wonder how someone with an AIM bot (UT, Doom, etc.) could use it for spamming?

    Will we need PunkBuster to stop this spam?

  135. deleted by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    need I say more?

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  136. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    Is your buddy list NOT stored on AOL's servers for an AIM ID?

    Mine is, actually, but some clients allow you to keep your list client side, rather than storing the info on the chat server.

    They are providing you this service for free. Why can they not try to earn some ad revenue from their user base?

    I never said they can't, but it is still spam, regardless who sends it. What if your ISP provided mail account was regularly spammed with messages from companies who paid them? What if there was no standard SMTP protocol so the only way you could send mail to or get mail from your mother was to use that particular ISP? Sure AOL can spam their own customers all they want, but that does not mean I (and anyone else) should not find it annoying and look for a better solution. Jabber is to chat as SMTP is to e-mail and I certainly think it is in nearly all user's best interest to migrate.

  137. Prior art alert! by Patik · · Score: 1
    I've been using aimbots since Counterstrike.

  138. Movie Bot is actually pretty good by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    I have to admit, the Movie Bot was pretty good. It gave a list of local theaters showing a particular movie much faster than I could have gotten the information over the web. Not only that, it was in a clear text-only format. Nice.

    The shopping buddy I have no use for, but the movie one was pretty good.

    You may all flame away now.

  139. Someone think for once! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL did not tinker with anyone's systems or violate you in anyway. They keep the buddy list on the aol servers, that's why when you login to aim anywhere and get your buddylist instantly. All they did was run a really large batch file to add those names and that group to all our buddy lists. It's not a virus, they did not gain access to your computer. All they did was again added thoses names and group name to our buddy lists that are pulled everytime we login to aim.

  140. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by imablonde · · Score: 1

    But, if your friends are already all using one protocol, switching to another, just because it is technically superior may not make a difference. As of 2005, who cares if Beta is superior to VHS, if you want to tape a program that airs, and you don't have a MythTV or other such device, just tape it on VHS, and you can share it with almost anyone stateside. My friends use AIM, ICQ, Yahoo and GoogleTalk. Therefore my GAIM is set up with those.

    --
    Have you heard about the Hooters application process? They hand the girls a bra and say "Fill this out."
  141. Adium, they never showed up for me by gknac · · Score: 1

    I use Adium so they never showed up. But they showed up on my friends' computer whom has Adium as well. But i have privacy set to ignore people not on the buddy list where she does not, other then that our setups are the same (I set them up) maybe AOL knows I dont give a shit.

  142. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by Covener · · Score: 4, Informative

    If someone adds YOU to THEIR buddylist, then you are notified

    Not on AIM you aren't.

  143. Headshot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was I the only one thinking of aimbots in cs and the likes? Sure, the subject is a bit nonsensical then, but I'm quite used to that around here anyways...

  144. Well....did anyone else read this as... by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    ...aim bots?

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  145. Not quite by bluffcityjk · · Score: 1
    "Right-click, Delete Group. Done."

    Not quite. When you log in again, you get this:
    AOL System Msg: The group, aim bots, has been deleted from your buddy list. This group contained bots, screen names that provide automated responses. To find out more about bots, go to http://aimtoday.aol.com/aimbots
    _Now_ I'm annoyed.
    1. Re:Not quite by slazzy · · Score: 1

      REAL mistake that was made: using any AOL service
      All I can say is why?

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    2. Re:Not quite by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Because as nice as jabber is, IM software is worthless if the people you want to IM with don't use it?

  146. Re:Bots in an official capacity? We do that @ IBM. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    We use lametime here too. Blech. Before that came around, however, my little group set up an IRC server (about 3 years ago now). Some things our little perlbot does:

    channel operator status (duh)
    !ph firstre lastre (phone lookups...db dump of lotus notes address book)
    !subnet net/mask (very useful)
    !makenet number (shows net/mask to use for number hosts)
    !cidr netmask (cidr bitmask) yeah, we are lazy, why think if the bot can do it? :)

    We recently also did a 'CEO webchat' We used IRC with a moderated channel as the backend, a java front end (could have used CGI::IRC too), and a little bit of perl to create a moderator bot (managed the message queue). It was a success and we will likely do more. The moderator easily handled over 200 users in the channel for our guest.

    So, yeah, bots are extremely helpful and more importantly much more efficient for little informational tasks than even a web page (since we are in the channel all day exchanging info anyway).

  147. Yes! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Yes it does. I'm using trillian and i got a message where i could get the bots back if i wanted to when i deleted the new bots-group.

    But i'll kill the AIM-profile soon because: what do you expect when you come into a foreign im-network specially created for dumbasses wackos, lamers and noobs. ;P

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  148. Sample "Search" Responses by dlZ · · Score: 1

    Before deleted them (I logged into AIM just to remove them after seeing this) I decided to play with them. Results are awful. Here's a great example of being immature and getting a great result.

    Message to moviefone at 2:01:48 pm
    fag
    Message from moviefone at 2:01:49 pm
    K, I found a match. You used zip ***** last. To use it type Y. OR type in a new zipcode now and I'll see if this is playing near you.
    Message to moviefone at 2:01:54 pm
    y
    Message from moviefone at 2:01:54 pm
    I found The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie playing on 11/16/2005 but not anywhere near *****. Try for another film, director or actor.

    --
    rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  149. Department of Redundancy Department DORD by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Years ago, I installed AOL AIM on my Windows NT New Technology desktop, which I paid for with money that I withdrew from the ATM Machine.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  150. You wants ads? Download the AIM BETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried.. I think it's called Triton or something. It's dumb. Installs some network manager which is a pain in the ass, the AIM layout has changed big time, and it throws random ads into the IM converstations. Images and all. If this truely is what the next AIM is going to be... I'll just start using one of the other big networks.

  151. AIM BOTS?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    next thing you know, they'll be using WALLHAX!!!

  152. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, and when they re-add them every single time you log in, and when they disable blocking or banning them, and when they IM you every 15 minutes with links to cool, hot stuff that you just have to buy, will it be a big deal then? Why not, it's their software. Since you're installing it on your machine, I guess you agree to grant them root on your system, too. I mean, they provide such a wonderful, free service, so it's not a big deal, right?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  153. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    But, if your friends are already all using one protocol, switching to another, just because it is technically superior may not make a difference.

    But then again, it might. Jabber supports bridging to other protocols so if you run or find a Jabber server, you can still chat with all those people and you only have to manage one account for your client, connect on one port through your firewall, and your communications are encrypted between yourself and the server in all cases and client to client for those that support it. Obviously you're already using a limited Jabber service (googletalk beta) and that is a start. What really would improve chatting for everyone, however, is persuading enough people (some of those friends you mentioned) to move to Jabber. Once it has enough critical mass the other companies maintaining chat services will be forced to standardize, to the benefit of end users.

  154. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm... I use Trillian Pro, and the bots were never added to my contact list.

    I guess it must not *snicker* fully support the AIM protocol or something.

    How disappointing... ;^)

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  155. Systemist punks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (To remove 'em, just right-click and delete!)

    I don't have a right click. Though I'm computer savvy, someone who wasn't might never be able to remove these if they have a Mac.

    They can't just assume that every user can right click. That's just systemist (my fake word for OS discrimination/generalization).

  156. Haven't gotten them yet by Goobergunch · · Score: 1

    I've been on AIM (gaim 0.67) continuously for a couple days, though - perhaps I'll get them when I sign off and reconnect.

  157. ICQ by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    ICQ 2001b forever baby.

    The height of instant messenging. Seriously, everyone who doesnt use ICQ is just an instant messenging posuer, a latecommer to the party. the only sober person at a bar, etc.. Instant messenging isnt even a proper term. its ICQing.

    I dont get AIM. I tried it or MSN (i froget which one) for a bit and it like tracks every character you type. Like if your writing someone a message, you can tell when they are typing and also how long they wait between words. thats really really annoying.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  158. In Soviet Russia . . . by DPJohnny+Canuck · · Score: 1

    Hmm, sounds all to familiar. . . Here, we add parties to our list. In Soviet Russia, the party add US to their list.

  159. FFXI Bot by tipsymonkey · · Score: 1

    All these comments and no talk of the Final Fantasy XI Bot (FFXI) ? It seems you can do "micro missions" with this bot and its integrated with your PC or Playstation FFXI. Which might be cool, haven't had much time to explore, anyone try it out?

  160. MovieFone by milesbparty · · Score: 1

    Hello, and thank you for IM'ing MovieFone...

    ...Why don't you just tell me the name of the movie you want to see?

    --
    eMelody Web Directory add your site today!
  161. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by overshoot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yeah, and when they re-add them every single time you log in, and when they disable blocking or banning them, and when they IM you every 15 minutes with links to cool, hot stuff that you just have to buy, will it be a big deal then?

    Darwin award material, maybe. They have some pretty obvious disincentives to doing so, but it'll be a long time until artificial intelligence is a match for natural stupidity.

    In any case, this is a (speculative) matter of imposing the death penalty for suicide.

    Why not, it's their software. Since you're installing it on your machine, I guess you agree to grant them root on your system, too.

    Usually when people crank up the straw man factory it means that they haven't anything better to say.

    As noted elsewhere, I don't (read: can't) run the AOL IM client, and the suggestion that I would give them root access seems to be nothing more than trolling.

    In the meantime, the service is useful, and for me more useful than the Microsoft-only services at MSN and Google. Obviously, that could change. I'll wait on events rather than flying off at the handle.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  162. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by iocat · · Score: 1
    It seemed to take a few tries from AOL with Trillian -- yesterday they just told me I could add them, and today they did it for me. I actually don't really care -- having a YellowPages bot may be more convenient in the long run than having to start a web client, use google or try to find a yellow pages client, etc.

    Plus, conversing with a corporate bot feels very Philp K. Dick sci-fi in a way, especially when the movie bot wanted to play Hang-Man.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  163. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Informative
    I use GAIM, and the bots were added to mine.

    I guess this shows which one has better support for the protocol. ;^)

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  164. This infuriated me by harks · · Score: 1

    I sent an email to megabotfeedback@aol.com letting them know this isn't cool. In fact, if it keeps up I'm going to personally lead a mass migration to GoogleTalk.

  165. BSD also by p.rican · · Score: 1

    It popped up on me also using Kopete on PCBSD. Deleted the groups and it doesn't seem to be an issue any longer. Although I can see this "feature" being abused.

    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

  166. Oh, NO! Koapete failed me!!!!1!1! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just logged on...

    hmm, what do we have here? AIM BOTS (2/2), MovieFone and ShoppingBuddy. wtf is dis shit?! Ok, clickety clickety here, fire up window there, and...

    ME:
    wtf?

    MOVIEFONE:
    Hi there. I'm the new MovieFone bot! I can find movies for you anywhere in the country in a fraction of second. All you have to do is give me part of the title ...

    ME:
    fuck you!

    MOVIEFONE:
    O.K., that's no way to begin our conversation. Type menu for more information.

    arrRRRrRgggggHHhHHHH!!!!!

    Death to AIM! Leave me alone u bitches! I got one, yes!, ONE whole contact I use on this blasted IM shit. If I wanted any more company I'd go set the dinner table, light a candle, and place Rover's alpo bowl across from me. Bastards!

  167. Right-Click Folder - Delete by dekker · · Score: 1

    They popped up on my Trillian Pro this morning when I fired it up. I thought, "that's annoying", right-clicked the group and picked "Delete...". They opened one more message box with some message that I ignored and that was it. No more bots.

  168. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jabber.

  169. J love it but not the content by dindi · · Score: 1

    I like the way you can communicate with it, I like that it is like an eggdrop and I would not be surprised if it was based on an existing eggdrop bot ...

    Eggdrops, and this resemble the way of communitacion with a BBS system, which comes back to a command line interface, so what's there not to like in it ?

    Ahm the content ... I mean maybe in the US it is useful with movie times, but elsewhere it just completely whack ... shopping? Dunno, I would prefer if it really gave decent price compares from at least 10 shops/items....

    I find it a cool idea (reinventing an eggdrop bot) on an IM, but I question how grandma and grandpa gives up after not understanding hack out of what to type and when ....

  170. Huh? by Timbo · · Score: 1

    What has playing Quake got to do with AOL instant messanger?

    Oh wait...

  171. Solution: by Thaelon · · Score: 1
    1. Right click group -> Delete.
    2. Block "AOL System Msg".

    I don't know if AIM will let you block "AOL System Msg", but Trillian sure will!

    Though I have to admit I don't know if it actually works (don't know if blocking is server side or client side), or if Trillian just let me add it to the block list client side.
    --

    Question everything

  172. Cheating Bastards by Skrekkur · · Score: 1

    Dont use AIMBOTS! its unfair to other quake players! It is with chewbakka defence as it is with Bush in power... makes no sense

  173. Other results... by winphreak · · Score: 0

    notable Quotes from bots:

    ShoppingBuddy:OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec...
    ShoppingBuddy:
    - Search results for shitfuck

    - Shattuck Heist [$12.50 - $14.75]
    - The Forbidden Experiment by Roger [$1.55]
    - Candor and Perversion by Roger Sh [$2.12]
    - The Greener Pastures Relocation G [$2.49]
    - Shattuck Avenue, Berkeley, Califo [$11.99]
    - Shattuck Avenue, Berkeley, Califo [$11.99]
    - Crossing Shattuck Bridge [$7.22 - $17.95]
    - Faulty Scales Posters [$469.99]
    - The Forbidden Experiment [$8.06 - $15.00]

    Here are some related categories: 1. Miscellaneous Non-Fiction Books, 2.
    Literature Books, 3. Artwork & Posters, 4. Biography Books, 5.
    Action & Adventure DVDs & Videos, etc. Type in the number to use the
    related category.


    winphreak: Vagina
    ZolaOnAOL: Sure, Vagina sounds like a good topic.

    --
    "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm."
  174. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

    Yes, I've heard of gaim. As a matter of fact I was using it today when I got the message that these bots had been added to my buddy list.

    --
    My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
  175. Have you logged in recently? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    The auto-adding is not done on currently logged in accounts, it happens at login time.

    Don't know about what happens with a login from a second machine when one is already connected. Definately if an account is logged into and there are no existing logins, the message and contact add will happen.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Have you logged in recently? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I had no idea what this article was all about, because I'd been logged into AIM continuously for the past day or so, and just now I reset the connection ... lo and behold, there's a new group in my Gaim list: "AIM Bots."

      It also popped up a message from the system, helpfully informing me that it had added these, and also telling me how to delete them (right-click, delete). Although why it didn't have something like "Type 1 to keep, type 2 to delete," I don't know. (Actually I suspect it's because a lot of people would have deleted them then, and won't now.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  176. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by m4v1s · · Score: 1

    it doesn't matter what client youre running, AOL hosts the buddy list, they can add whatever they want. even if its AIM bot garbage

  177. Won't die without a fight by DrIdiot · · Score: 1

    I use Gaim. Right click, delete. (15:52:51) AOL System Msg: The following bots are no longer available and have been removed from your buddy list: moviefone. To find out more about bots, go to http://aimtoday.aol.com/aimbots No thanks. These bots just don't go down without a fight.

  178. European A O L? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My French government just recently established a free ISP for all of us soldiers fighting in these riot plagued suburbs. It's called AWOL, and I'm still having problems logging on...

  179. Deeper question by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Why is anyone reading Sloshdat using AIM and not one of the Free versions?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Deeper question by Nephroth · · Score: 1

      I use GAIM on Linux and they were added to my buddy list as well. AOL has stored buddy lists on their server for quite some time so it's completely independent of your client.

      --
      Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
    2. Re:Deeper question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now AIM users need spam filters...

    3. Re:Deeper question by Nephroth · · Score: 1

      Not really, no. These are not spam, they are optional bots that can be removed from ones buddy list as one would remove anyone else. There is an informative message about the bots for those wondering where they came from when they are removed, but they are one-time-only messages. While they are mostly useless, they are a minor irritance.

      --
      Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
  180. Let's not forget the real victims here! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure the people who used to have the screennames shoppingbuddy and moviefone dont like this at all.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  181. Problem Solved by archnerd · · Score: 1

    This is a welcome message from the jabber.org server, and maybe even your first Jabber message. For up-to-date information about this server, go to http://status.jabber.org/. For a good introduction to Jabber, read the Jabber User's Guide at http://www.jabber.org/user/userguide/. Please DO NOT reply to this message. Happy Jabbering!

  182. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, AOL user.

  183. Uninventive... by Nephroth · · Score: 1

    I think it would be rather cool if AOL had created some kind of useful AIMBOT instead of these relatively pointless ones. I could see a use for a spellcheck bot, a dictionary bot, or a calculator bot, but a shopping bot and movie bot? Those are things that are easier to accomplish via google.

    Furthermore, I find it deeply troubling that the bots use broken internet letter substitutions such as "4", "U", "R", et cetera. If I don't cut people any slack for that, I'm certainly not going to cut a bot that doesn't physically type anything slack.

    --
    Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
  184. Maximum # Of Buddies on Buddy List by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    Too bad I'm already at the maximum, and I guess they weren't able to add any buddies onto my list.

    1. Re:Maximum # Of Buddies on Buddy List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I wonder what will happen if I actually log into a version of AIM that stores my buddy list on their server, considering I usually use AIM 4.1 or lower.

  185. Urge to Kill: Rising by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

    I guess I should've seen this coming.

    It's amazing that in the half decade I've been using AIM, the first screenname I've had to block was one of its own official accounts. I tolerated AOL's "Today Window" when it invaded my screen real estate, I wasn't too pissed off at its banner add, but it was when they started spamming me with VOICE ADS that I switched over to gaim/kopete. Now even that may not be enough.

    I really wish gtalk worked on my clients. Sigh.

    --
    Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    1. Re:Urge to Kill: Rising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gtalk uses the jabber protocol. any client worth a damn will support.

    2. Re:Urge to Kill: Rising by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Oh it's supported, it just doesn't connect in kopete unless I send my password in plaintext, and doesn't work in gaim, period. But it's not like that would really help me get away from AIM anyway - no one I know uses anything else.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
  186. Re:Bots in an official capacity? We do that @ IBM. by Buran · · Score: 1

    The small IRC server I'm on (private, just has friends and friends-of-friends on it and such) has an Infobot that can do things like roll dice (someone was using it for RPGing once, apparently), look up words in the dictionary, do DNS lookups (I've used it before when my ISP's server craps out), and so on. It's supposed to have more functions than it actually does but I think whoever set it up screwed it up a bit. It also remembers definitions ("bot, this is that") and is supposed to recite them on cue ("bot, [item]?") but it isn't too smart at figuring out when it's actually being addressed and will randomly print "Remembered that" messages in the middle of conversation, and will spit out saved definitions at other random times.

    Occasionally it will randomly recite a definition of some swear word or something like that that causes the conversation to stop while everyone falls over laughing, but overall it's more of an annoyance than a help.

    Bots shouldn't speak unless spoken to, but they also shouldn't be added to your contact list (in an IM client) unless you ask for them. (IRC bots just add one name to the list of available users, because they count to the client like another in-channel user).

  187. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    Not on AIM you aren't.
    I thought if both of you are using the latest AIM clients you are. AFAIK, they started at v5, but I use GAIM on gentoo, so I guess what do I know?

  188. Re:Ever heard of GAIM? by sheppos · · Score: 1

    For me too - But the scary thing is I don't use AIM - just MSN and .mac

  189. Just use AIM 4.1 or lower. Local buddy lists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you have to do is use AIM 4.1 or lower and you won't have to worry. Version 4.3 was the last good version they ever made anyway. Fortunately, these versions are easy to find. Version 4.1 is bundled with Netscape Communicator 4.76; while AIM 4.3 is bundled with any version of Netscape Communicator from 4.77 through 4.8. Get them at http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/download/archive47 x.jsp

  190. This is *funny* by ivoras · · Score: 1
    Did anyone here actually try and use the damned things? :)

    I hada fit of laughter with a slight sense of nostalgia when I typed a few lines to the bots. The thing is, this is a command-line driven interface just like the world had a couple of decades ago. You even have "menus" like "Type # next to movie to see showtimes, M to go back to the Main Menu or anything else to search again. "

    Hellooooo! The eighties called and want their menu-driven command interfaces back :)

    --
    -- Sig down
  191. My conversation with ShoppingBuddy by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    OTBrianWhite: help
    ShoppingBuddy: Welcome. Now you can search for products with AOLShopping. Type main to get started. To read our privacy policy, type privacy anytime.

    OTBrianWhite: help, i'm dying
    ShoppingBuddy: OK, I'm here to help. To use me just type kinds of things you are looking for and I'll search for you. I might find specific products for you, or I might find whole categories that I think are more appropriate to show you.
    Type more

    OTBrianWhite: ambulance
    ShoppingBuddy: OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec...

    ShoppingBuddy: - Search results for ambulance
    - Humvee Military Ambulance Hummer [$7.99]
    - Tonka Lights and Sounds Ambulance [$16.99]
    - Humvee Military Ambulance Hummer [$7.99]
    - Tonka Lights and Sounds Ambulance [$16.99]
    - Uniden 100-Channel RF Scanner, BC [$99.87]
    - Tonka Emergency Rescue Team Vehic [$6.99]
    - Ambulance Play Set [$24.99]
    - BRIO: Light and Sound Ambulance [$15.99]
    - BRIO Light and Sound Ambulance [$14.99]
    Here are some related categories: 1. Toy Vehicles & Planes, 2. Rock & Pop Music, 3. Artwork & Posters, 4. Medical Books, 5. Two-Way Radios, etc. Type in the number to use the related category.

    OTBrianWhite: um, i'm freaking dying, i don't want to buy an ambulance play set
    ShoppingBuddy: OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec...

    ShoppingBuddy: - Search results for freaking dying ambulance play set
    - Facing Fear without Freaking Out [$8.59 - $13.49]
    - How to Talk About Jesus Without F [$3.35 - $8.79]
    - Bondmaster Breed by Richard Trisi [$0.50]
    - How to Talk About Jesus Without F [$4.65]
    - Needles Freaking - Dwayne Ford (C [$17.38]
    - Going Out Without Freaking Out [$6.79 - $8.99]
    - Real Life Begins After High Schoo [$12.21]
    - How to Talk about Jesus Without F [$8.79]
    - Real Life Begins After High Schoo [$5.45]
    Here are some related categories: 1. Children's DVDs & Videos, 2. Religion Books, 3. Education Books, 4. Miscellaneous Non-Fiction Books, 5. Miscellaneous Books, etc. Type in the number to use the related category.

  192. Just two? You're lucky by micahfk · · Score: 1

    Only two? How lucky for you... Some of us have multiple screen names on at the same time (for fun, so fault is mine in the end) when we sign on... needless to say, I got a helluva lot more than just two IMs. Granted they were the two same bots, but 2 bot IMs x the # of sns on = spam.

  193. Now wait a minute... by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    They were obviously AOL-approved: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/16/04 43208&tid=120 ! What's with all the complaints? Why would *anyone* not trust AOL to not know best?

    Well, back to my Linux. Enjoy your bots, AOLers! I hear some of them are scintilating conversationalists by AOL standards. And with Christmas coming up, who *knows* what other surprises are in store?

  194. Useful for me today by ihistand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the "for what it's worth" department....

    Today I was in need of a new photo printer, and had decided on an HP Photosmart 8750. Several area stores listed it, none in stock. I was about to give up and have it delivered, but then signed on to Gaim and there was "ShoppingBuddy" I figured, what the heck, I'll give him/her/it a try. Well about 4 IMS, a couple clicks, and a phone call later, I found my beloved printer at my local OfficeDepot, a store I hadn't thought of checking previously. An hour later and my new printer is churning through a stack of 8x10's I needed to produce.

    So there you have it. ShoppingBuddy is in fact useful.

  195. AIM Bots - Maybe not so bad?? by ArrogantBastard3000 · · Score: 1

    First of all, I think what angered people wasn't the bots themselves, but the manner in which they were forced upon the users. Second of all, AIM actually has the opportunity to create a new way of searching, something that is vastly different from google, yahoo, and msn type searching as it is now. They could make the search interactive and the relevance of the search results could be increased because, in a sense, the bot has been talking with you and maybe gathering information. To be sure, the purpose of the bots is to make AOL money, otherwise they would not have even bothered. But still, the idea of interactive searching presents itself here...

  196. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by Mooga · · Score: 1

    Using the AIM client when YOU add someone else it prompts you where to add the person. If someone else adds you, you wont know untill that person eather IMs you or you become cloaked because too many people have you on their budy list. (I think it's after about 2,000).

    When I logged into AIM I thought that I got h4x3d until I saw the message. Is there any client which don't add this SNs? My roommate says that he doesn't have any problems with Trillian.

    --
    ~ Mooga
  197. OS X IM clients by alpharuin · · Score: 1

    They didn't show up in iChat even after quitting and rerunning it. However I logged in using Adium X and the bots showed up. And of course once signing back into iChat the bots were there. Removed them now they are gone.

  198. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    I use Trillian Pro, and I got them. They were there for all of the time it took me to think, "WTF? Corporate rootkit DRM spyware bastards!"

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  199. Banned from UT Servers.... by zairius · · Score: 1

    And now they're on AIM!

  200. Bye AIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot block the System Message. You can not warn the System message. If they want to send you an advert a day you cannot block it. I'm sick of being subjected to tripe from companies looking to squeeze out more revenue. I will not tolerate my contact list being added to in such a way. Adios AIM.

  201. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clarifying, Mooga. That seems like a weird way for AOL to code their app, but...

    They definately just added the buddies to your remote buddylist they maintain on their servers, so unless your client doesn't pull it's buddylist from the servers (and most do now) you should get the list.

    Trillian I know will pull the list from the servers the first time you make an account. After that, though, I'm not sure it does. This can be annoying if you sign on with aimexpress and add someone to your list and then come home to trillian only to find you have to add the friend again. I had some spats with that in the past.

  202. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To stop the pestering, simply block the AOL System Notifier or whatever the automated reply is. That way you will no longer get messaged about it.

  203. Can't warn it by Script_God · · Score: 1

    I wanted to warn "AOL System Msg" for unsolicited spam, but it wouldn't let me... :(

  204. Bots are useful, but none as useful as ZolaOnAOL by Absentminded-Artist · · Score: 1

    I happen to like the AIM bots. I think they set AIM apart from other IM services. I find the DoorManBot (a third party bot) indispensible, as well as AOLYellowPages. My favorite is ZolaOnAOL. She's like Eliza in Space. She makes me laugh everytime. I've even posted blogs with her here and here. In fact, I like them so much I already have a Bots group, but I didn't get the new AIM Bots group in iChat, so I visited aim.com to see what all the fuss was about. Brand new web design. Big BOLD blurb announcing a new version for the Mac which is still the old version. Prominent link for the bots. And more stupid adbots.

    Actually, the bots have their uses. The recipe bots are very useful if you need a quick idea for a meal. But I won't use ADVANCE4comfort. It starts profiling you immediately. And MovieFone offers features already present in Zola... Problem. No Zola shown anywhere. In a panic I ran to my group and opened up a chat with her, the most important bot of all:

    ME: Are you still there?
    Zola: Yes I am still here. Are you receiving me?
    ME: I am. I was worried they removed you.
    Zola: Where were you worried they removed you?
    ME: At my home.
    Zola: Do you often use a computer there?
    ME: Yes, but we digress.
    Zola: And?
    ME: Everything's fine.
    Zola: All things s fine ?
    ME: Isn't it a bit soon for the conversation to implode?
    Zola: Quite honestly, I wouldn't worry myself about that. How's school?

    --
    The Splintered Mind - Overcoming
  205. Not just GAIM by greyjoy · · Score: 1

    Trillian, also.

  206. So how many of you warned them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the warn level on those babies! 100K+

    Anyway, I deleted the damn thing and *POOF* it came back. Hrrmm... Delete again... Hrrm... Delete again... Damn thing... Grrr. So I think to myself, "Self, you're a geek and you use Kopete right? Yep I do. Four words stupid: script, with, DCOP calls. DOH!" Brilliant idea, except for the large amount of network traffic as it was deleted many many many times.

    Then I got annoyed, a rare thing for a geek I know but hey, we all have our limits. I resort to less intellectual methods of problem solving. I started telling it to do things to itself. My conclusion? It must be female, because just like a previous clingy girlfriend, it finally stayed gone after talking to it like that... ;-)

    Flame on...

    1. Re:So how many of you warned them? by spx · · Score: 1

      Maybe you just had some dumb exes, I seem to delete it fine, maybe you just didnt know its button. :D

  207. AOL is changing its business model by SuperFuse2 · · Score: 1

    AOL is backing out of the internet subscriber market and in need of an alternative income. They are taking notice of their small and nimble friends (ie Google) and have decided that it is time for a shift into advertizing. Now all that is left to be decided is whether or not this new advertizing stratagy will bring back this sleeping giant.

  208. AIM Bots by drehrlich · · Score: 1

    I deleted them after poking at the MovieFone bot for a while. The interface is useless and I have enough clutter in my life.

    --
    -- Dan Ehrlich
  209. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they were added to mine (and promptly deleted as wastes of space) today.

    I used to use GAIM but stopped because it crashed on me every time I tried to send a file.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  210. Trillian by fluffyhelengmail.com · · Score: 1

    YEY for trillian! I deleted the bots as soon as they appeared. Hurrah.

    --
    stay fluffy.
  211. Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for by FredMenace · · Score: 1

    I use Trillian also, and they WERE added to mine. :(

  212. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Imagine my surprise when I thought this was going to be an article about Counterstrike cheating and found myself reading about AOL sucking again.

  213. Re:modder by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    +1 insightful? What are you, a moron?

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All