I think what he meant is to have the capability to have a real-time simulation of the Universe from the quantum particles to macroscale galaxies and et al... which, I think is never.
That's right! Randal Mills at BlackLight Powers will demonstrate his "hydrinos" million uses and how it uncovers the Grand Unified Theory in a few months! WooooOoooOOOoooooo...... Suck that Mister-Everything-Is-Relative-Dude!
That isn't true. It's been in the news recently - Amazon is profittable, but they chose to reinvest it in their expansions. Some stockholders are pretty peeved about it...
If you want to dabble and learn about it, check it out. It's a book written by a prof. at ucr and it's the best freaking ASM (x86) book ever existed, and it's freaking free online.
"well, as i said, one of them had to "always have existed". you cant (in my mind) get something when NOTHING else existed"
Lets sidetrack back into the real of physic for a second (well, more like metaphysic), there's this thing called 'Vacuum Genesis'. Go have a look at a website somewhere; extraordinarly provoking. Well, if you're willing to be that open anyway.
I think this question is best left to the philosophers and their pot-head psychonaut counterparts.;) Don't want to steal their way of life now... As a philosophy major, I insist you cease pondering this topic immediately! HALT! =P
:) It really kicked ass, didn't it? It ran great on my 386SX25 with 2MB of RAM, so...
Yep! That's because most if not all of the demos in those days were completely written in assembly. Remember how tiny they were? I guess they didn't call the parties Assembly '9* for no reason. Jeez.. so much memories... VECTOR BALLS rule! lol:P The relevant part of this is that why aren't today's coders opt for the effiency and technical challenge of the early day hackers rather than pumping out messy stuff quickly? There's something to be learned in this nostalgia trip.
When we talk of the evil of Microsoft and how it's the spawn of Bill Gates', it isn't, well, very satisfying. I think, the root of the problem is, aye, the stockholders and the investing sharks. Think about it. Prior to the company going public and performed the greatest act of ballooning up to a giant hot dog, it was actually doing something, er, good for the PC community. One could see how this could and probably is the case of it getting to the collective giant heads of Gates and co. However Gates' ambitions are placed, Microsoft's prime objective now is not that of furthering technology, but to make money for the share holders. This scenario always happens, it is the way, it is the American Way (tm).
P.S. In a rush, but you get my drift? Well I hope so.
Slashdot Mirror
I think what he meant is to have the capability to have a real-time simulation of the Universe from the quantum particles to macroscale galaxies and et al... which, I think is never.
That's right! Randal Mills at BlackLight Powers will demonstrate his "hydrinos" million uses and how it uncovers the Grand Unified Theory in a few months! WooooOoooOOOoooooo...... Suck that Mister-Everything-Is-Relative-Dude!
That isn't true. It's been in the news recently - Amazon is profittable, but they chose to reinvest it in their expansions. Some stockholders are pretty peeved about it...
http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/Page_asm/ArtofAssembly/A rtofAsm.html
If you want to dabble and learn about it, check it out. It's a book written by a prof. at ucr and it's the best freaking ASM (x86) book ever existed, and it's freaking free online.
"well, as i said, one of them had to "always have existed". you cant (in my mind) get something when NOTHING else existed"
Lets sidetrack back into the real of physic for a second (well, more like metaphysic), there's this thing called 'Vacuum Genesis'. Go have a look at a website somewhere; extraordinarly provoking. Well, if you're willing to be that open anyway.
I think this question is best left to the philosophers and their pot-head psychonaut counterparts. ;) Don't want to steal their way of life now...
As a philosophy major, I insist you cease pondering this topic immediately! HALT! =P
:) It really kicked ass, didn't it? It ran great on my 386SX25 with 2MB of RAM, so...
:P
Yep! That's because most if not all of the demos in those days were completely written in assembly. Remember how tiny they were? I guess they didn't call the parties Assembly '9* for no reason. Jeez.. so much memories... VECTOR BALLS rule! lol
The relevant part of this is that why aren't today's coders opt for the effiency and technical challenge of the early day hackers rather than pumping out messy stuff quickly? There's something to be learned in this nostalgia trip.
JP,
Might I ask if you can code in any other languages aside from HTML?
When we talk of the evil of Microsoft and how it's the spawn of Bill Gates', it isn't, well, very satisfying. I think, the root of the problem is, aye, the stockholders and the investing sharks. Think about it. Prior to the company going public and performed the greatest act of ballooning up to a giant hot dog, it was actually doing something, er, good for the PC community. One could see how this could and probably is the case of it getting to the collective giant heads of Gates and co. However Gates' ambitions are placed, Microsoft's prime objective now is not that of furthering technology, but to make money for the share holders. This scenario always happens, it is the way, it is the American Way (tm).
P.S. In a rush, but you get my drift? Well I hope so.