Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Top 10 Hacks of all Time

C|Net recently made waves with its "Top 10 Hacks" story which seemed to say that Hack==Website Defacement. Derek Glidden found that wrong. And I'm glad he did because he's proposed that we do our own top 10 hacks. He's written a fabulous article, and challanges us to come up with a real list of hacks: The good stuff. Not the script kiddie stuff that the media likes to use to generate extreme headlines. Read this story. Its a good one.

A lot of people pointed out in Slashdot's recent coverage of an article run on C|Net called "The Top 10 Subversive Hacks of All Time" that 8 out of the 10 so-called "Hacks" listed were merely website defacements and not deserving of the "Hack" label at all. Here's your chance, as the Slashdot community, to set the record straight!

C|Net, perhaps in some kind of bizarre response to millenia fever, has lately been printing a few "Top 10 Lists" of sensational-sounding topics but rather lame content:

The Top 10 Technology Terrors - Billed as "10 products that will scare you to death" complete with a cute little Grim Fandango-esque skeleton as a mascot. Of course Back Orifice is on the list. Are you terrified yet?
Top Ten Terrors That Scare Web Builders - I'm not even sure where this article is supposed to be going. I know when I'm building a website I'm always "scared" of the Y2K problem as it relates to interfacing with my mainframe...
Ten Tricks for Digital Pranksters - Which I'd hoped might be at least slightly amusing, but turns out to be amusing in the same way that going to a K-Mart, finding the Commodore 64's on display, disabling BREAK and writing that BASIC program '10 PRINT "K-MART SUCKS "; 20 GOTO 10' was amusing when I was 12. (But then, it's not a "Top Ten" list, so I shouldn't complain.)

Given the trend, one wonders when their "Top 10 Pr0n Websites That Will Make Your Child Grow Up Into A Pervert If He or She So Much As Thinks About The URL", "Top 10 Most Violent Video Games Guaranteed To Make The Flesh Of Your Flesh And Blood Of Your Blood Turn Into A Deviant Sociopath Who Will Probably Shoot Up A McDonalds By The Time They're 25" or "Top 10 Really Annoying Top 10 Lists That We've Broken Up Into One Page Per Entry To Maximize Our Banner Ad Display" lists will show up.

Regardless of whether or not C|Net gets it in general, (I think I've made my opinion on that clear by now. :) they surely dropped the ball on their "Hacks" article. Rob and the gang at Slashdot liked my suggestion that the question be put to the Slashdot community and find out what you consider a "Great Hack."

So what is a "Hack"?

A lot of people reading that article were disappointed that C|Net decided to more or less define "Hack" as being equivalent to "website defacement", completely ignoring the traditional, more creative and useful meaning of the word. (Notice here how I deftly sidestep the whole 'hacker' vs. 'cracker' debate...) How should we determine what's a "Great Hack", much less the Top 10 of All Time, then?

Eric Raymond's Jargon File defines "Hack" in the first two meanings as:

"1. n. Originally, a quick job that produces what is needed, but not well. 2. n. An incredibly good, and perhaps very time-consuming, piece of work that produces exactly what is needed."

(Which are entirely contradictory, but hackers never let mundane things like paradoxes slow them down.) He further refines the meaning in Append ix A, "The Meaning of Hack" as:

"Hacking might be characterized as `an appropriate application of ingenuity'. Whether the result is a quick-and-dirty patchwork job or a carefully crafted work of art, you have to admire the cleverness that went into it."

If you'll notice, nothing in these definitions say anything about a "Hack" being computer-related. There have been many great Hacks that are not computer-related; it's just that people tend to associate the word "hack" with computers.

Adding to the ideas defined above, an "All-Time Great Hack" will probably also have:

  • longevity - people should still be talking about it 20 or 30 years later, or even beyond.
  • social and/or technological impact - it should change some aspect of life, either by directly changing every-day life or indirectly by changing how people view the world
  • "eleganc e" - note however, that this does not necessarily equate simplicty. (Some people may consider the Saturn V booster a truly moby hack, as it got its job done precisely well with no doubt as to its purpose, but was anything but simple.)
  • that not-easily definable quality of "I shoulda thought of that!" A Great Hack doesn't have to be "not immediately obvious" - it may just be something nobody else has done yet. For example: the WWW - there's nothing "unobvious" about defining a set of page layout macros that include text and graphics and a way to transmit and view them, but it didn't become commonplace until Tim Berners-Lee made it a big deal.

Some examples of things I would consider "Great Hacks" by these guidelines:

  • Putting Apollo 11 on the moon - the NASA engineers at the time of the Apollo project are, to my mind, some of the greatest hackers in history. When you consider the state of technology at the time, what they accomplished is amazing.
  • Ken Thompson's "cc hack" - No explanation necessary. A truly elegant hack that is already part of computer folklore.
  • Both the "development" of AT&T UNIX into BSD UNIX and the way BSD was distributed, essentially creating the first widespread market demand for "open source software."
  • Of course, no Slashdot feature article would be complete without mentioning: the development of the Linux Kernel, both for what it is and how it was/is developed.

But wait, there's more!!

In his Appendinx on "The Meaning Of Hack", ESR also says:

"An important secondary meaning of hack is `a creative practical joke'."

and MIT's Gallery of Hacks defines "hack" as:

"The word hack at MIT usually refers to a clever, benign, and "ethical" prank or practical joke, which is both challenging for the perpetrators and amusing to the MIT community (and sometimes even the rest of the world!)."

A sure point of dissent in this definition is going to be the "ethical" clause. I'll take the easy road out and leave this point to be decided by the audience - if enough people think a particular hack is a "Great Hack" regardless of ethics - then into the pot it goes.

On the other hand, the closest thing I can think of to a "Great Hack" that skirts ethical boundaries is the Robert Morris Worm. It's an event that will live in infamy in the lore of the Internet for all times for the problems it caused, but that it could accomplish what it did shows an incredible understanding of the way the systems worked and how they were interconnected at the time it happened.

It's still not entirely easy to think of "All-Time Great Hacks" that fit this definition, including the "ethical" clause:

  • The canonical example is usually the MIT hack of the Harvard-Yale football game in which MIT students caused a six-foot weather baloon covered with the letters "MIT" to inflate at the 40 yard line during a pause in gameplay
  • In the Slashdot article, "Uruk" pointed out that Orson Welles' broadcast of "The War Of The Worlds" in 1938 is arguably the best example of this definition of "Hack" that the world has ever known

So we have two definitions to deal with: The "Classic" Hacks, and the "MIT-Style" Hacks. It may or may not be worthwhile to separate these out into two distinct categories - I think we'll have to wait to see if there are enough unique entries in each category to require two lists.

What now?

In this feature, I would like you to list what you think are the "Greatest Hacks of All Time" and after a time to let enough people enter their suggestions and comments, I'll come back and gather up the most popular/frequent responses. Those suggestions will go up as a Slashdot poll, and the top ten from that poll will be officially listed in a subsequent feature article: "Slashdot's Top 10 Hacks of All Time" along with a bit of background on each one; rather like C|Net, except we'll put them all on one page for you.

There is only one restriction I would like to impose on suggestions: they have to be able to be documented somehow. I used to know a guy who could make his TRS-80 machines play music with software that somehow buzzed the floppy disk motor at different rates, which is a neat hack, but as I have no idea where he lives, if he still has a copy of his software, or even where to find a TRS-80 to play with anymore it's not a good candidate for this.

I've defined what it takes for a hack to be a "Great Hack", I've given some examples to help "seed the idea pool", and now it's your turn: what do you think should go on Slashdot's list of the Top 10 Hacks of All Time?

760 comments

  1. this one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ph1r5+ p05+ j00 muth@s!!!!


    Z3r0k3\/\/l859@AOL.COM

  2. Hacking is dead? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

    Alright "hacking" as was the popular understanding of it was really dead back in the early days of the internet. With various crypto schemes and security measures it has become increasingly difficult to do anything very effective. Modern operating systems like linux/*BSD/*nix, etc have allowed for very rigid system security. I guess the only places left are windows boxes.

    --
    Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    1. Re:Hacking is dead? by 0x25 · · Score: 1

      No hacking isn't dead. You seemed to miss the point somehow. Hacking in my mind, is racking your brains trying to figure out how something works and trying to make it work _better_ (which can mean more efficiently or to make it work towards your own benefit). There's just as much (if not more) hacking going on today as there was before.

      --
      =
    2. Re:Hacking is dead? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2
      The hacks are just buried further beneath all the other mundane garbage. Many times a great hack is simply something done to get a stuck project unstuck; if nobody ever stops to look back on it, nobody realizes how wonderful it was. Often, a hack is merely an amazing insight, applied at the right moment.

      You can find a beautiful and elegant hack just by opening a grandfather clock: the escape wheel and pallet.

      One of engineering's best hacks was the laying of the first cable for the bridge across Niagra Falls: the surveyor saw a kid flying a kite, so he gave the kid a dollar to snag his kite in some bushes on the other side of the falls. Then he used the kite string to pull a cord, and the cord to pull a rope, the rope to pull a cable, and the bridge was underway.

      One question I think needs answering at this point--what's the difference between a great hack, and a great invention? I ask this because something like the screw inside an Artesian well simply blows my mind with its simplicity, but in the intervening millenia it has become a standard device. If inventions count, I propose the wheel-and-axle and the use of interlocking gears as the two most significant hacks in history.

      --

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    3. Re:Hacking is dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hacking to me is the use of potentially dangerous features to solve a problem. In other words hacking is frightening. Those fixes you make and say "That fixes it, but ..." That's why you have to go back and unhack periodically. My favorite hack story is the ForTran programmer who set 3 = 4 to avoid editing a large file. A good hack takes nerve. Allen Buck Michigan

    4. Re:Hacking is dead? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      How does one actually do that? Seems to be impossible.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    5. Re:Hacking is dead? by Pandemic · · Score: 1

      Nothing about hacking is dangerous! Using unsupported/deprecated features is just stupid. Using undocumented features is crafty. (Note that undocumented and unsupported are not necessarily equivalent.)

      I think the greatest hack of all time is probably sendmail. Wow.

      --
      There's no vaccine for quick-and-dirty.
    6. Re:Hacking is dead? by Xenu · · Score: 1

      The trick is that constants are assigned storage locations, like initialized variables in C. Function and subroutine parameters are passed by reference, so if you pass a constant as a parameter to a function/subroutine, the address of the constant is passed to the function/subroutine. The function/subroutine can assign a new value to the parameter, changing the value of a "constant". It is common for compilers to consolidate references to a constant to a single storage location, for example all references to "4" use a single address containing the value 4. This is compiler/system dependent, but it used to be possible to do this on many systems.

  3. Top 10 hacks... by CYberPhreak · · Score: 2

    One of the top hacks I would like to see is the cracking of the RSA? encryption. This was quite the fascinating hack, and I feel that it is well deserving to be placed on the list

    --

    Buy the ticket, take the ride.

    1. Re:Top 10 hacks... by CYberPhreak · · Score: 1

      ACtually, now that I think of it, why not include Linus "God" Torvalds as one of the top ten greatest hackers of all time. I live linux, and feel that this Finnish masterb[iece should also be included on the list of hacks.

      --

      Buy the ticket, take the ride.

    2. Re:Top 10 hacks... by um...+Lucas · · Score: 3

      Linus, on of the top 10 hackers of all time? I'm sure my emailbox is going to get crammed for saying this, but Linux is only Unix, which was already invented, cheapened with free source.

      Yes, it's a great OS.

      Yeah, it's pretty cool that it made source code widely available to people.

      But he didn't really create anything... Even the development model was already established before he did what he did.

    3. Re:Top 10 hacks... by HBK-4G · · Score: 2

      absolutely not.

      Linus has done nothing than further develop an existing model. Yes, he has done a good job, and thousands upon thousands of people have helped out or used Linux.


      1) Learn how to spell.


      2) Linux is not the end-all of OS's.


      3) If you ever were to call an OS a hack, look at Win98. You complain that it crashes all the time. Did you ever think that it is a miracle that it runs at all? Props to the Micro$oft engineers for constructing the Frankenstein of operating systems, and making it run.

    4. Re:Top 10 hacks... by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      Well because of his "lack of innovation" I can actually use my 486 instead of becomming a contract killer to get my money for my Pentium LXVI to run windows on. It feels good to be cheap and be able to get away with it.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  4. Steal this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Abbey Hoffman has pulled off some of the greatest hacks in all history, but I don't think any of them involved computers. Boy did he stick it to Ma Bell.....

    1. Re:Steal this post by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. In _Steal_this_Book_ Hoffman describes the time he plugged his phone wires into the 120 VAC electrical outlet - it seems that Ma Bell never thought they needed protection from that particular hack.... easily verifiable, documentable. Now the telcos have breakers everywhere instead of fuses.
      --Charlie

  5. Open Source Rules! by holzi · · Score: 0

    The more participate the more succes a project has!

    First Post?

  6. Bill Joy and BSD by David+Jensen · · Score: 1

    I know this is pretty big for a hack, but would anything else have been possible without it?

  7. C|Net's not trying to "scare" you by Pyr · · Score: 3

    As a host on C|Net's Builder Buzz I'm not exactly an employee, but I do spend a lot more time around C|Net and C|net folk than I'm sure most /. readers except the employees and I have to say with the "Top Ten Subversive Hacks", or "Top Ten Things that scare Web Builders" they're not trying ot be frightening or sensationalist, they're more trying to be interesting and a little funny.

    When they did their "Top Ten Clients from Hell" on builder.com they had goofy little graphics on those too, as they do most of their articles. It should be obvious to most of you (esp. the web builders) that they're not saying these types of clients ARE literally from hell (Just as Back Orifice isn't literally "terrifying), they're just trying to give all of us who have GONE THROUGH that kind of thing a little laugh and some help for dealing with these people.

    You guys take C|Net too seriously, and I don't think they deserve the criticism you give them.

    1. Re:C|Net's not trying to "scare" you by zimbu · · Score: 1

      Well what if C|Net put up Top Ten High School Pranks: #10 Jimmy Helger set fire to a trash can during lunch hour and cleared the school out for 2 hours. #9 Stevie Myers, not to be outdone, called in a bomb threat and get school cancelled for an entire day! Most people would see a problem with that as it encourages that type of behavior. I don't think most /.ers want to see more of those types of "hacks." I think most of us would rather hear about useful hacks, the creation of the personal computer, the Internet, the Linux OS. If young computer enthusists think that one becomes a "hacker" by defacing a website then all the talent they might have put into something great will goto waste.

    2. Re:C|Net's not trying to "scare" you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C|Net doesn't deserve the bandwidth it eats. I can't believe I actually read all ten of those Tricks for Digital Pranksters. Disbelief due to quality of content...not reading ability! At least I filtered the banners...

    3. Re:C|Net's not trying to "scare" you by schweda · · Score: 2

      Yeah but the problem with C|Net and much of the otherstream "mainstream digital analysis" sites are that they consistently ring hollow. Jesse Berst, for example.

      It's pretty much sensationalist writing informed by the "trend of the moment": Here's-10-Reasons-Why-Y2K-Should-Scare-The-Hell-Ou t-Of-You. Or, maybe: Here's-My-Dumb-Reasons-Why-DSL-Will-Fail.

      No, they're not out to "scare" people -- and I defy a slashdot reader to admit that he/she was actually "scared" by anything posted in C|Net -- but they're out to cash in on the hype -- and they're out to stir up the hype.

      It's like a kid on a playground who spots a fight and then starts goading one of the fighters -- "Your mama dresses like Flo from Alice, you trailer park piece of poop" -- knowing that his taunts will only make the fight worse than it is for the participants -- but much better than it was for the spectators.

      That's the big problem with C|Net -- you cats more than often not don't contribute analysis to the debate. You stir the flames, sit back, and when you're criticized -- you claim that the flames were already burning long before you got there.

      I don't buy your assertion that, hey, give us a break, we're just trying to make you laugh. That's bunk. If you wanna make me laugh, tell me a joke. But don't jump on the hype-wagon, push my buttons, and then claim you're just the messenger -- and look, dude, lighten up and don't kill the messenger.

      It's parasitic analysis, IMHO.

    4. Re:C|Net's not trying to "scare" you by waldoj · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is best not to take C|Net seriously. I sure don't.

    5. Re:C|Net's not trying to "scare" you by scotch51 · · Score: 1

      Amen again

      --
      In Nearly All Paradigms, Shift Happens.
    6. Re:C|Net's not trying to "scare" you by wuice · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminds me of slashdot.

  8. A Nomination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5
    I nominate the first person to write a video game machine emulator for the Nintendo Entertainment System. The backwards-hacking involved in learning enough to even start the project is extremely impressive. To then take it and write an emulator is equally impressive (anyone who has tried to write an emulator knows its not as easy as it sounds even WITH all the tech info). But why the NES instead of one of the other systems, and what about the newer ones like the N64 and PSX that are getting emulated? Well, the N64 and PSX emulators aren't really true emulators and while they do do some neat hacks, they inherit a whole lot from what started with NES emulators. In case you didn't know, there are over 100 separate memory mapping schemes (implemented via chips on the cartridges) to take into account, as well as some strange programming habits followed by the game developers (especially Squaresoft) that made debugging extremely hard.

    Esperandi

    1. Re:A Nomination by pb · · Score: 1

      Hmm. You've got a point, I have massive respect for emu authors, and I love the NES. However...

      I'm also pretty impressed by MAME, MESS, and even the early C64 emulators. The NES really is a simpler system in some aspects... But the concept of emulating a completely different hardware platform, and doing it well, sure is neet. :)

      The first NES emulators I remember were... PasoFami, it was Japanese, for Windows, and often found badly cracked and translated. Also, SuperPasoFami was the most functional SNES emulator for a while, until snes9x got better. iNES is pretty old, too.
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    2. Re:A Nomination by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      You forgot NESticle I remember using that for a while to play an early zelda release.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    3. Re:A Nomination by pb · · Score: 1

      What? I didn't *forget* nesticle, it came out much later. It is perhaps the best NES emulator out there (others support more mappers, but it has authentic sound, and good playability) but unfortunately lacks a Linux port. :)
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    4. Re:A Nomination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The various and first NES emulators are good hacks, but if your going to talk emulation, why not back track to its roots? Emulators have been written for years -- go back to the Atari ST and Amiga for Apple emulators and original arcade emulators. Go back to CPM emulators on even older machines. Certainly, they are better hacks in terms of ingenuity than the NES emulators. Perhaps the first CPU emulator should be considered, since emulating a NES isn't much more than that and the mappers...

    5. Re:A Nomination by pb · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but where does it all start? That would take some serious research. Remember that "Microsoft" BASIC for the Altair was written on a CPU emulator. Much past that is just too early for me... :)
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    6. Re:A Nomination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before there were the first console emulators, there were the first arcade emulators, and before them there were the first C64 and Apple II emulators. At least, the first true emulator I remember seeing (which, BTW came with assembly source) was a mostly completed Apple II emulator. A year or so later there was a C64 emulator which ran but slowly on my XT with Hercules mono graphics -- the ancestor to C64S, I presume. FF a couple years to get to the Digital Eclipse authored emulators (the first commercial arcade emulator was theirs, AFAIK, which ran on a MAC (Williams Arcade Classics minus one game)) and Sparcade, the first hobbiest arcade emulator.

      But, yes, I would agree that emulators in general should be included in the top ten.

    7. Re:A Nomination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who may say that other platforms were emulated first... remember that the NES was an _undocumented_ console, and yes there were other emulations of consoles later.. the ground work was done with the NES, and later emulators learned from the NES emulator's mistakes. AppleII,C64, etc might have been emulated but at least they use/used digitally transferable media such as floppy disks. The NES had to grab from cardtype-connector cartridges. -- Eric Windisch

    8. Re:A Nomination by BJH · · Score: 1


      Hmmm... I remember a Vic-20 emulator running on the C64... that would have been 1982 or so, I guess.

  9. A good hack. by Manhattan+Project · · Score: 2

    Deep Blue II was a very elegant hack, incorporating a wide variety of technologies for one stupid little purpose.

    -John

    1. Re:A good hack. by Nyarly · · Score: 1

      I strongly disagree. AIUI, DB2 was designed for one purpose: beating the Grandmaster. So, IMO, it was a bigger kludge than a hack. A hack would have been a general purpose chess program that could win. Not what amounted to a patch on DB1 so that it would be fit for one purpose.

      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
  10. KremVAX by Kinthelt · · Score: 4
    This has to be among the top 10. Not only did it fool just about everybody on Usenet, it was benign (a Good Thing).

    See the jargon file entry

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    1. Re:KremVAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is it, that this reminds me of the radioplay on "Mars attacking", done by Orson Welles years ago?!? :)

    2. Re:KremVAX by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      Exactly how many people in the 1980's even had "the internet" let alone access to nntp? Seems like about 15 or so.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    3. Re:KremVAX by chandoni · · Score: 1
      Speaking of Usenet hacks, I'll nominate Kibo. There's an "intuitively obvious" idea, but one which was incredibly impressive at the time.

      For those who started using computers after the Death of Usenet (tm), Kibo would enter any discussion thread in any group in which his name (including misspellings) was mentioned. I don't know if he does this on Slashdot, though!

      JMC

    4. Re:KremVAX by billstewart · · Score: 1

      One problem with Usenet discussion groups is it's sometimes hard to tell humor from seriously-intended statements. I'll take your question as humorous :-)


      You can find Usenet histories on the net, but it started in about 1981, between Duke and UNC. It was a few years before much of Netnews used the Internet to connect - most of it was UUCP, either on dialup connections or dedicated private lines, and some parts of it were various other protocols such as Berknet. NNTP was a few years later - you can look up the RFC to find out when.


      Besides Usenet, there was also the Fidonet distributed BBS network, and various non-forwarding BBSs, and Amateur Packet Radio was growing, and there was the Plato system (ancestor of Notesfiles and Lotus Notes) which was basically a big graphics-capable BBS running on some unusual mainframe with cool plasma-display terminals, and eventually there was Habitat running on C64s.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    5. Re:KremVAX by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

      You can't forget NAnet!

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

  11. Demos! by pb · · Score: 3

    Anyone remember the Second Reality demo for the PC in 1993? Amazing, right? Well, the only thing that could possibly top that would be...

    Second Reality for the C64 in 1997! I was amazed, the sound was very good (and the video somewhat limited for obvious reasons :) and it ran fine on vice, with a little tweaking. :)
    ---
    pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:Demos! by palp · · Score: 1

      Man, Second Reality blew me away.. I was all of 12 or so years old then, and that was probably the coolest thing my 486 (and I) had ever seen.. Future Crew, in my opinion, were gods.. wonder whatever happened to them.. back in the Quake days I remember a rumor that they were working on a FPS.. guess that fell through.

      --
      -palp
    2. Re:Demos! by pb · · Score: 1

      :) It really kicked ass, didn't it?

      It ran great on my 386SX25 with 2MB of RAM, so...

      And, actually, I could still get it to work under DOS on my P133. I should try it under VMWare sometime, just for hack value...

      Hmm. Good question, whatever did happen to Future Crew. I guess they grew up. Here's Abyss's page. Apparently they were going through high school, and writing demos. That's the short, short version. :)

      If you can get ahold of FCINFO.TXT (or something like that), it has more details. Like, they were founded in '86, Psi has been with them since the beginning, etc. They were our Gods, so it's hard to picture that they were just kids once, too. :)
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    3. Re:Demos! by Gedge · · Score: 1

      A few of the future crew guys went onto form Remedy Entertainment. They were/are working on an FPS called Max Payne.

      A couple of them were also working on a 3d chip called Pyramid 3d which was demonstrated but never appeared.

    4. Re:Demos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have one this chip at home... finny piece of hardware. Shame that it was never selling..

    5. Re:Demos! by Pandaemonium · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't believe this, but now they're at Bitboys. I cannot wait to see the Glaze3D in silicon.

    6. Re:Demos! by arcade · · Score: 1

      Future Crew, in my opinion, were gods.. wonder whatever happened to them..

      Well, they were Gods - but not like the christian God. They were mundane, had normal human weaknesses and so forth (remember how they cheated in the grapics compo one year? I don't remember who it was, but one of them ripped another persons picture, adjusted a few details, and released as his own).

      Anyways, I think FC was involved (at least some of the crew) in the game 'Death Rally' a couple of years ago.


      --

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    7. Re:Demos! by ALecs · · Score: 1

      Actually, some of the guys from Future Crew, working with Remedy Entertainment, have a demo out now called "Final Reality" available at www.finalreality.com. Go get it and watch the famous "city scene" in modern 3D (they ripped themselves off for one scene :) Also, if you're so inclined, load the music up in your favorite MOD player (it's an XM sitting in plain-sight in the program directory - gee) and read the message.

    8. Re:Demos! by pal · · Score: 1

      hornet.org is slashdotted, try: ftp.cdrom.com - pal

    9. Re:Demos! by Sehnsucht · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that SR for PC had Dolby Surround (pre-mixed instruments in the s3m (I think it was s3m?) and the GUS mixing fubar'd it, but a SBP it worked fine.. finally a bragging point for the ol SBP, eh?) !

      Man o man.. they had some cool stuff. Them and .. who made Amnesia demo?? darn, can't recall.. the guys who did the Amnesia demo made a cool game for Epic called Zone 66..

    10. Re:Demos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amnesia was made by Renassance. Zone 66 was an alright game, but it could have been so much more. Unfortunately, Tran didn't want to put the work into it that it would have required.

    11. Re:Demos! by Zuul · · Score: 1

      The music the music the music. Never ever have i heard soo good music in demo, animation or even a track. Everytime i drive to a Demo party it is the music heard. This is defenetly the best demo ever made. Great graphics, and incredible music. Makes me wan't to se it again and again and again. This demo really decervse to be in the top ten hacks of all time. P.S. i concider it a lack of education not to have seen or heard it :)

    12. Re:Demos! by LordXarph · · Score: 1

      ::Future Crew, in my opinion, were gods.. wonder whatever happened to them.. ::

      A good chunk of the Future Crew went to form Remedy Entertainment. Apogee has put out their Death Rally, and they're working on Max Payne for 3D Realms. Some of the members (Trug and Wildfire I'm almost certain of, and I think Psi too) joined Bitboys Oy and are designing the Glaze3D chipset. They also designed the now-defunct Pyramid3D for Tritech. The bump mapping technology Microsoft licensed for DirectX was created by them, I believe.

      -Lx?

    13. Re:Demos! by LordXarph · · Score: 1

      ::remember how they cheated in the grapics compo one year? I don't remember who it was, but one of them ripped another persons picture, adjusted a few details, and released as his own::

      Not the way I remember it. I believe the picture in question was "Ice Kingdom," which was drawn from scratch by Skaven. It was inspired by another piece of artwork, but was done pixel-by-pixel by Peter.

      -Lx?

    14. Re:Demos! by Raven667 · · Score: 1

      I thought that I saw one of their taglines at the end of Epic Pinball. BTW: the MOD music on some of those old Epic titles like Pinball, OMF2097, Jazz Jackrabbit was really something. I still play Epic Pinball and OMF, and consider them the best games in their respective genres that I have seen for the PC.

      --
      -- Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
    15. Re:Demos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well - yes - those old Epic titles were done by guys like Tran, PSi+Gore/FC, etc. And the music, naturlich, was done by their mates.

      chuckb

    16. Re:Demos! by echo-e · · Score: 1

      i definetly agree that demos are definetly worthy of observation for the best hack. although 2nd reality was truely impressive, i imagine some of the earlyer amiga demos were even more impressive both in what they did and the worthyness of the hack. some of the 4k demos are really impressive too. all ASM and highly optimized.

      on another note...what about that article that was on slashdot a while back about the worlds smallest web server.

      i also once heard a story about an altair that was programmed to play a tune on a radio reciever nearby that picked up radiation from the computer and created tones of various frequancies based on the size of the loop in the program. i dont know about that hack...i heard about that a while back.

      -james

  12. U.S. Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    The U.S. Constitution is one of the top ten hacks of all time!

    Balancing states' rights, balancing power among three branches, with a guarantee of a free press to keep them all in line... User-modifiable, but only if they really are sure about what they're doing...

    1. Re:U.S. Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look in disbelief that anyone could think that tha American Constution is a *good* thing. Let me get this out of the way first "America is a great place and has great people and a decent democrocacy" (not quite as good as Australia's though). But do you guys realise just how many people get killed in Americia with GUNS. A _right_ enshrined in your constitution. That has to be the stupidist mistake in the history of man.

    2. Re:U.S. Constitution by Patrik+Nordebo · · Score: 2

      I'm not going to get into this discussion, but the right to bear arms wasn't in the original constitution. It was added in the third (I think) amendment. The poster was talking about the original constitution. So it's the pro-gun people who should complain, not that anti-gun people. :-)

    3. Re:U.S. Constitution by scotch51 · · Score: 1
      • I look in disbelief that anyone could think that tha American Constution is a *good* thing.
      You sir, are opening your mouth and revealing yourself to be an under-educated fool.

      Let me amend that, since most /. readers are indeed very well educated.

      Your education, Mr. Anonymous Coward Sir, seems to be tragicly restricted to that which has been fed you within the Ivory Tower of a formal education. I do sincerely hope you suvive, when at last you venture into the real world.

      • But do you guys realise just how many people get killed in Americia with GUNS.
      Indeed we do, including the fact that slightly over half of that number are suicides.

      Clearly however, you are unaware of the fact that the presence of a gun prevents not less than 2 Million crimes (including murder, robery, rape and assault) each year in the USA.

      Well over half of the States in the USA now have "shall carry" laws which mean that the local governments within that state must recognize the legitimacy of a concealed weapon permit issued by a county government anywhere within that state. The upshot of this rather welcome trend is a statistically significant downward trend in violent crimes, in those states where "shall carry" laws are enacted. This was such a significant trend that the national averages have been trending down for some time now.

      You see, one need not discharge a weapon to have its presence deter a criminal from his intended victimization.

      I could dare you to look in on a great many web sites and usenet news groups to get reinforcement of both sides of this debate...

      Hmmm.... let me instead humbly suggest that a good starting place is Amazon.com where you should look up the reviews and user comments on a book entitled: Point Blank by Professor Gary Kleck, from the University of Chicago. It is a thick and expensive book, but you can get 80% of the value of this schollarly and peer reviewed book just by reading the commentary about the book by official reviewers and those added by Amazon customers. Amazon will also point you to other similar works, where again, you can get a good feel about the content from the reviews.

      --
      In Nearly All Paradigms, Shift Happens.
    4. Re:U.S. Constitution by Chewie · · Score: 1

      It was actually the second amendment, I believe, which referred to the people's right to bear arms and have a standing militia. Other than that, you are quite correct.
      ---------------------------

      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
    5. Re:U.S. Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second amendment says that "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall no be infringed." BUT, the courts have ruled that it is only the right of the state, and the states can outlaw guns, as in Morton Grove and some others.

    6. Re:U.S. Constitution by rlglende · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you can explain Australia's death and armed-robberry rates have gone UP in the year since Australia abolished guns.

      Meanwhile, in the US, Clinton/Reno sold 2 million guns per year for a couple of years with their anti-gun legislation, and our crime-rate has been falling the whole time?

      Poor logic, no grasp of facts --> fallacy.

      Lew

      --
      "The Constitution, the WHOLE Constitution, and nothing but the CONSTITUTION."
    7. Re:U.S. Constitution by psychonaut · · Score: 1


      Clearly however, you are unaware of the fact that the presence of a gun prevents not less than 2 Million crimes (including...

      Wait, let me guess...

      murder,

      Murder... hm... now what do murderers usually use to commit their murders? Could it be... guns ?

      robery, [sic]

      Robbery... hm... now what do thieves usually use to commit their robberies? Could it be... guns ?

      rape

      Rape... hm... now what do rapists often use to restrain their victims? Could it be... guns ?

      and assault)

      Assault... hm... now what do thugs often use to injure their victims? Could it be... guns ?

      So what you are saying, essentially, is that you Americans need guns to prevent crimes involving other guns. Sounds perfectly logical. Good thing that constitutional amendment of yours gave you the right to bear arms or Zeus knows what the crime situation would be.


      Regards,

    8. Re:U.S. Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am from the USA and I do not see how your generalized and disparaging remarks are beneficial.

      If your point were: The USA would benifit if people could not own guns because there are good alternatives that can save you from the most common forms of abuse.

      Is that true? I don't know, it sounds reasonable to me. But I don't really know the statistics on the pros/cons of guns in the USA.

      It is common knowledge that most crimes are inflicted by someone that the victim is close to. Attackers unleash wrath on victims out of unresolved anger. Often times harsh words pushed the anger of the attacker past their threshhold. Other times an attackers anger can be turned aside with gentle words.
      Most victims are not natural born killers and might wish they had some nonlethal means to deter the attacker. Whether a person should be; using the threat of a gun or using a nonlethal weapon, is worthy of debate.

      My point with this note is that you can speak in such a way as not to provoke anger and in that way you might realize the greatest peace achievable is not by any law but my taming our tongues.

      I have lived in Los Angeles for a very long time. Have I seen gun violence? No, not personally. I try to esteem others as higher than myself. I am attentive to the needs of my friends and they are to mine and we are happy. This is the America I live in. The America that you envision in your mind is utterly foreign to me.

    9. Re:U.S. Constitution by roomfull+of+blues · · Score: 1

      30 years ago the crime rate was dramatically lower than it is today and guns were *more* prevelant than they are today -- few, if any *gun laws*.

      The fact that many criminals commit crimes with guns does not mean that banning guns will stop, or even reduce, crime. If criminals want to use a gun, they'll get a gun, even if they break ten thousand laws in the process. If they cared about keeping to the law, they wouldn't be criminals!!

      However, a far more important (in terms of the *big picture*) reason for *not* banning guns is to protect the people *from* the government. It is a well known and documented fact that before any dictator can come to power, he must first remove from the people the power to defend themselves. This was one of the first things Hitler did when he came to power!

      The purpose of the 2nd ammendmant is so that the people can keep the government from taking away the other ammendmants in the Bill of Rights.

      BTW, I might have my reference wrong, but I remember somewhere in the beginning of the US code, passed in the first session of the first congress, American citizens are declared "a federal militia". Thus all the arguments about the 'militia' part of the 2nd ammendmant are cast null and void.

      Does anyone know if the Library fo Congress has a webpage? If they do, I'll go ahead and find the exact reference.

    10. Re:U.S. Constitution by Pete+Bevin · · Score: 1
      Protect yourself from the government with guns? Give me a break. Peasants with guns versus tanks and armies? I don't think so.

      Now, back in the 18th century, when standing militiae were a really important part of the fight against dictatorship, the second amendment was a good thing. But this is 1999, when the main use of guns is to defend yourself against other people with guns. Surely you're not serious...

    11. Re:U.S. Constitution by psychonaut · · Score: 1

      The primary point of my message was not to decry the availability and use of guns in America, but to berate the original poster for his questionable logic. If the only purpose of owning guns is to defend yourself against guns, then why not just not have guns in the first place? Had firearms never been legal originally, there wouldn't be nearly as many murders. It's much easier, emotionally, to pull a trigger and injure someone from afar than it is to stick a blade in someone's gut or bludgeon them to death with a heavy object. Guns, as a mechanised means of murder, do much to divorce the assailant from the consequences of what they're doing. There's no need to argue this point; it's statistically proven that the murder rate (measured per capita) is astronomically higher in the US than in any other Western country. Thousands of people are murdered with guns each year in the States; by contrast, Canada and the UK typically count their annual gun-related murders in the single digits.

      Another poster in this discussion also mentioned that banning firearms is not a deterrent to criminals. While this may be true if the ban were enacted tomorrow in the USA, it's certainly not true of the pre-existing ban in most other Western countries. Even criminals would be hard-pressed to find a handgun or semiautomatic weapon in Canada or the UK.


      Regards,

    12. Re:U.S. Constitution by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Protect yourself from the government with guns? Give me a break. Peasants with guns versus tanks and armies? I don't think so.

      I do, perhaps you need a history lesson.

      I'm going to submit some words, see if you can find the revelance in them.

      Revolutionary War
      Vietnam
      Pakistan

      History has shown that people fighting for their lives and freedom on their home turf with inferior weapons CAN defeat superior armies.

      Your view on gun control is irrevelant, I own several guns and will not give them up no matter what ANYONE says. And I'm not alone.

      Finkployd

    13. Re:U.S. Constitution by moonboy · · Score: 2

      Murder... hm... now what do murderers usually use to commit their murders? Could it be... guns?"


      So, following your logic, we should also ban knives, baseball bats, hammers, screwdrivers, etc. etc. A gun is merely an implement, albeit and efficient one, which is probably why it is often used. People kill, not guns.


      "Robbery... hm... now what do thieves usually use to commit their robberies? Could it be... guns?"


      People commit robberies, not guns.


      "Rape... hm... now what do rapists often use to restrain their victims? Could it be... guns?"


      Pardon me while I attempt to restrain my laughter. Rapists use guns to restrain their victims? I would think a better answer would be rope or how about fear?


      "Assault... hm... now what do thugs often use to injure their victims? Could it be... guns?"


      See above.


      Guns are blamed (wrongly so, in my opinion) for many of the ills of our (American) society. I think most logical people would agree that the problems of our society stem from much deeper issues than guns. How about lack of compassion for human life, clinical depression, alcoholism, drug addiciton, erosion of our values, ad infinitum. Please look at the source of the problem to solve it, not the result.


      ----------------

      "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein

      --

      Co-founder and designer at Music Nearby: http://musicnearby.com
    14. Re:U.S. Constitution by psychonaut · · Score: 1
      So, following your logic, we should also ban knives, baseball bats, hammers, screwdrivers, etc. etc. A gun is merely an implement, albeit and efficient one, which is probably why it is often used. People kill, not guns.

      You have just proved my point (thank you) which was to demonstrate the fallacy inherent in the original poster's statement. If people are the problem and not guns, then you're just as better off having no guns as having them. The OP stated that the reason for owning guns is to defend oneself against guns. Well, guess what -- if there are no guns, there is no need to have a gun for the purpose of defending yourself against them.

      Also note that nowhere in my messages do I advocate government restriction of firearms. Though I decry the need for guns, particularly in societies where they are not prevalent to begin with, I am a staunch supporter of individual liberty. The purpose of my original message is to demonstrate that causes are never helped by proponents who demonstrate a poor understanding of the subject by making illogical, circular arguments.

      If you want to debate ownership of firearms, which was not my original intention, all I can say is that I would rather live in a society whose population has voluntarily eschewed them than in the United States. I certainly would not advocate a sudden ban on firearms in the US, as this would only make a bad situation worse. While many ordinary citizens might follow the law and turn in their guns, criminals would begin hoarding them, and would soon become a much more powerful group in society as a result. It's simply a Catch-22 in the US; now that you have firearms, you can't very well get rid of them even if you wanted to.


      Regards,

    15. Re:U.S. Constitution by roomfull+of+blues · · Score: 1

      > I own several guns and will not give them up no matter what ANYONE says. And I'm not alone.

      I am in exactly the same place you are. And yes, people with inferior weapons can fight back if you get enough of them together for a cause. No one person can fight a tank, even with a gun, but when many people believe in something, and are willing to fight for it anything is possible.

    16. Re:U.S. Constitution by moonboy · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the reply. I enjoy reading the intelligently stated opinions of others whether I agree with the or not. It's what makes Slashdot so great.

      ----------------

      "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein

      --

      Co-founder and designer at Music Nearby: http://musicnearby.com
    17. Re:U.S. Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been killing each other long before firearms became accessable to the private citizen. Further, in keeping with the spirit of the constitution, the right to arm yourself is rather important if you wish to protect yourself from a tyrannical and oppressive government wich has a large supply of firearms at their disposal. I don't think that sticks and stones are going to help you much if an unlawful military presence decides that you should be detained, or your house needs to be searched without cause.

  13. Do we get to hear about the good cracks? by sufi · · Score: 3

    The question is, what percentage of the really good cracks do we actually get to hear about?

    I mean, the major companies would put people under pain of death for leaking any information about the really dangerous interesting non script kiddy stuff. I think there are many more out there than we know about, and probably some very rich people because of them. It's just impossible to tell.

    Of course, it's funny how people can actually use being cracked to their advantage. As with the UK Conservative Party who last night announced that a 'hacker' had tampered with their accounts, coincidentaly the same day as a major newspaper revealed that the Conservative Party had been fidling their books for the umpteenth time in the past few years.

    Slightly suspect I think

  14. 1st Compaq computer by Paolo · · Score: 3

    This is one thing which comes to my mind when I think of a great (in this case, hardware) hack. Compaq used the annals of law and engineers to reverse engineer the IBM PC's BIOS and general hardware interactions. It was clever, they worked around the clock, and it was a marvel they got it working right.

    --
    "In individuals, insanity is rare, but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule." -Nietzsche
    1. Re:1st Compaq computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Phoenix reverse engineered the BIOS and invented the "clean room" approach. Compaq was an IBM licensee.

    2. Re:1st Compaq computer by Sehnsucht · · Score: 1

      My step-mom worked at Compaq, so I'm sure she's right..

      I don't recall what she said about the BIOS, but Compaq DID reverse engineer MS-DOS do create Compaq DOS, and they used those clean room principles. I would bet that they also reverse engineered the BIOS, but I'm not sure..

  15. The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by Croaker · · Score: 5

    The legend of Woz coming up with the floppy controller for the Apple II on a napkin, and implementing it in an insanely short amount of time is definitly a legendary hack.



    Hell, for that matter, the Apple II entirely was a hack. Name another commercial PC which was designed by one person. And, I believe, he wrote the first OS for it, to boot.

    1. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by pb · · Score: 1

      Yep. That's what you did with OSes back them. Booted them. I mean... never mind. :)

      Commercial PC's designed by one person. Hmm. Cray? Originally designed with a pencil and paper, and later, perhaps, on a Macintosh? ;)
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    2. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by TonyJohn · · Score: 1
      Sounds kinda like the BBC Microcomputer - designed in stupidly short amounts of time, partially on napkins, and incredibly sucessful.

      I know that one still has a use in the computing service at Cambridge University. What's more, that BBC could not easily be replaced by another machine.

      I think the Americans missed out on that one. (they didn't ever get them did they?)

      TJ

      PS Note that use of a BBC does not reflect the standard of computing at Cambridge in general.

      --
      Owl tried to think of something wise to say, but couldn't.
    3. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by Gid1 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the OS written on paper in 6502 assembly? Once typed in, I think they found one minor bug, or something.

      They were still soldering the motherboard while another bloke was stalling the BBC guys in the hallway.

      Definitely a top hack.

      Anyway, BBCs were really underrated by the rest of the world. A machine that in 1981 had 16 built-in digital I/O ports, 4 analogue to digital converters, a user-controllable relay, and the best hack language ever designed: BBC Basic.

      I used a BBC Micro in a production environment as recently as 1994. Nothing quite as reliable!

    4. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by julest · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I'd have to vote for pretty much the entire guts of an Apple II on this one. I still remember times when you could look at the circuit diagram for a computer and actually _KNOW_ how all the bits worked.

      In particular, the video circuitry was a work of art - IIRC correctly, it essentially consisted of two IC's and a transistor. One IC was simply a counter that generated the addresses of video memory to read, the second IC scrambled the addressing (dead sneaky - reading in the scrambled order ensured that all the DRAM chips got hit regularly enough so that their data didn't decay), and a discrete transistor to drive the output properly.

      And of course, all the logic was standard TTL IC's, so you really could replace bits when it all stopped working. :)



      -- Jules

    5. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Ahh, I remembered the good ol days, when I could just sit down and read slashdot, without even having to think about grits. Of course we had to squell data down our analog phones at 300 baud, up hill both ways. BUT we enjoyed it! AND ANOTHER THING... ZZZZ.... where am I??

    6. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by Sehnsucht · · Score: 1

      ah, cray made micros? Thought he just did those bigass number crunching behemoths. :)

    7. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by zero-one · · Score: 1

      ...and turned down Microsoft Basic in favor of their own. (I still like BBC Basic now).

      Anyone remember Chuckie Egg (as I just found a very nice remake of it)?

    8. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by Digital_Fiend · · Score: 1

      I believe the original owner/president guy of the Cray computer company (I believe he passed away a few years ago) toggled in an operating system in octal. feer.

    9. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by Gid1 · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember Chuckie Egg (as I just found a very nice remake of it)?


      A classic game in just 6K, AFAIR.

    10. Re:The Floppy Controller for the Apple II by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Hell, for that matter, the Apple II entirely was a hack. Name another commercial PC which was designed by one person. And, I believe, he wrote the first OS for it, to boot

      The SAM Coupe was another commercial PC which was designed by one person :)

      Si

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  16. larry++, guido = guido + 1 by Jules · · Score: 1

    Perl and Python, of course! The former is of course more widespread but the latter is much more elegant (in my humble opinion).

  17. My candiates by Giraffit · · Score: 2

    I'd nominate TEX - well designed, elegant, usefull, and 100% bugless! Perhaps the only bugless program in existance.

    also GNU emacs is quite a hack.

    --
    Ballerinas have fins that you'll never find
  18. Apollo _13_ by schporto · · Score: 5

    I think the recovery of Apollo 13 was a much better hack than Apollo 11. True Apollo 11 was a magnificent piece of work. Achieveing exactly what was desired. But Apollo 13 required true ingenuity by most parties involved. And using the ship in manners not really expected. Just my opinion.
    -cpd

    1. Re:Apollo _13_ by john_gault · · Score: 1

      Yes!!! This is exactly what comes to my mind when thinking of a hack -- creative problem solving in a dire situation. Especially when in unexplored territory and the tools at hand are grossly inadequate.

    2. Re:Apollo _13_ by Mithrandir · · Score: 3
      I'm not sure if I agree directly, but I think the whole Apollo program was a great hack. Just think of the memorable things 30 years later - Space Food Sticks, Tang and Velcro ....

      I had the fun of working with an ex-Apollo veteran for 3 years. He was working in the Simulator side. None of these lovely Onyx boxen for generating graphics - all mechanical star fields and control maintenance. Computing was barely even used for the control and monitoring.

      He worked on the simulator side of the Apollo 13 recovery. The story goes that he was clocking off shift on that day. The guy before him left the building through security, but he got turned around and told to go back to work. 48 hours later and he takes the first bit of sleep. Now I've done quite a few 24+ hr coding runs, but this still blows me away every time I think about it. Not only did these guys have to know the entire computing system, they also had to know most of the maths/physics they were simulating _and_ also had to be a half-decent mechanic too. There's not many of todays hackers that could claim that level of capabilities.

      The most interesting things you never hear about. I spent a lot of time travelling with him to do various things. The really great hacks of the entire Apollo program will never make general knowledge. I'm pleased that I've had a chance to hear about many of them first hand from someone who really was there.

      --
      Life is complete only for brief intervals in between toys or projects -- John Dalton
    3. Re:Apollo _13_ by georgeha · · Score: 1

      The most interesting things you never hear about. I spent a lot of time travelling with him to do various things. The really great hacks of the entire Apollo program will never make general knowledge. I'm pleased that I've had a chance to hear about many of them first hand from someone who really was there.

      Well?

      You can't just tantalize us like that, spill some, even if you have to log on as AC.

      George

    4. Re:Apollo _13_ by AJWM · · Score: 3

      You beat me to it.

      Although, like "the Apollo 11 landing", the "recovery of Apollo 13" is a bit too broad and general to, IMO, qualify as a hack. It comprised several hacks, to be sure (as did the whole Apollo project), but we should look at them separately perhaps.

      The single greatest hack of Apollo 13 was, I think, the kludging together of assorted baggies, spacesuit hoses, checklist covers and duct tape together with the (square) LiOH canisters from the CM to fit the (round) hole for the LM canisters.

      The single greatest hack of the Apollo project -- which made it possible at all -- was probably the Lunar Orbit Rendezvous mission profile itself. That was championed by a lone engineer in the face of a lot of opposition that wanted Earth Orbit Rendezvous (requiring two Saturn V launches) or Direct Ascent (requiring a Nova-class booster).

      --
      -- Alastair
    5. Re:Apollo _13_ by rmstar · · Score: 1

      Yeah!

      If the film get's it right, there are many hacks
      involved: Landing on almost no power, building an
      CO2 filter out of stuff that was around, getting
      into deorbit position by hand(!)... I mean...

      rm *

    6. Re:Apollo _13_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no doubt in my mind that Appolo 13 was one of the best hacks ever. I would put it in my top 10 list for sure. Probably #2 or #3... The Constitution being #1 and the development of the atomic bomb being #2 or #3.

    7. Re:Apollo _13_ by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      Apollo 13 was just a failure and it really didn't prove anything. We should be using "hacks" to send people to mars or beyond. Perhaps developing a warp drive system.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    8. Re:Apollo _13_ by emmons · · Score: 1

      especially if you consider the limited time and extream stress put on the people that came up with the solutions. These kinds of people are amazing. If only I had that type of intellect...

      -----

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    9. Re:Apollo _13_ by robserver · · Score: 1

      "Hacking might be characterized as `an appropriate application of ingenuity'. Whether the result is a quick-and-dirty patchwork job or a carefully crafted work of art, you have to admire the cleverness that went into it." If you will please note the "quick-and-dirty patchwork" portion of this definition, that in my mind is exactly what the recovery Apollo 13 was a series of quick and dirty fixes. Yes it is true the mission was a failure in the sense that they went with the mission to land on the moon and failed to do that, however the mission was a success in the sense that a group of people managed to think far enouth 'outside of the box' that in a very short amount of time they fixed problems with very few resources and without being on the same planet as the problem at the time. That is a success and a truely great hack.

  19. Intel x86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recal, the intel microprocessor began as strictly a simple adding machine and some crazy guy somewhere realized that hey wait a sec... this can do more... such as run an operating system and hence the birth of computers........ I will do some research and add more as a comment. Anyone else who know, please feel free to add

    Thanks, The Mole

    1. Re:Intel x86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont seem to remember intel being responsible for the birth of computers. I seem to recal names like babbage, and machines like "Colossus" and the "Altair" Brad

  20. My nomination by tweek · · Score: 4

    Perl.

    A simple text processing language gone haywire ;)
    Seriously though, a simple hack that went from a tool to produce reports has become a driving force behind the web.
    "We hope you find fun and laughter in the new millenium" - Top half of fastfood gamepiece

    --
    "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    1. Re:My nomination by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      Good question why invent a new language (usually in my mind a gread deal of work) rather than use the avaible tools (easier and takes less time and is more accurate)?

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:My nomination by pb · · Score: 1

      "What's Perl got that sed and awk don't have?" :)

      Sometimes I agree with you, that Perl looks like sed, awk, shell, and C, beaten together without their consent. Which is basically what it is. And it's interpreted, which places its speed right between that of shell scripting and C. (think three orders of magnitude here, with shell scripting the slowest and C the fastest)

      However, I've seen some very impressive, short Perl scripts. There's something to be said for three lines of obfuscated code that really *does* something. But woe betide the coder who finds maintenance programming written in Perl, for that is truly evil.
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    3. Re:My nomination by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      which places its speed right between that of shell scripting and C. (think three orders of magnitude here, with shell scripting the slowest and C the fastest)
      But woe betide the coder who finds maintenance programming written in Perl, for that is truly evil.

      Why is it that every third slashdot discussion contains a thread bashing Perl by clueless people?
      If you can't write well written code, blame yourself, not the language.

      -- Abigail

    4. Re:My nomination by Azul · · Score: 1

      Hell, yeah. Since they can't understand it (cause they have not taken then time to learn it), they bash it.

      Tsk, tsk, tsk.

      Perl ROCKs.

      Alejo.

    5. Re:My nomination by wuice · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think even Larry Wall says perl code is hard to read. Of course, I think he takes a certain amount of pride in that fact..

  21. My #1 by Matts · · Score: 2

    patch.

    Without this small hack of a utility bringing peoples changes to widely distributed sources would be a never ending pain. Of course patch isn't perlfect (yes, I did spell it wrong on purpose :)), but it does a damn fine job under the circumstances, and is used by an awful lot of people - myself included. Thanks Larry.

    Things I don't consider hacks: Linux 2.0+, emacs, XFree (!), enlightenment, gnome, kde.

    --

    Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
    1. Re:My #1 by pb · · Score: 2

      Huh? Emacs and XFree are definitely hacks, in one way or another. (Originally perhaps more the April Fool's variety, I'm afraid...)

      Emacs: Let's write a LISP INTERPRETER on top of UNIX and call it a TEXT EDITOR!!!

      If that shouldn't be a Zippy quote, I don't know what is. I'm not even going into byte-compiling, since Java took that seriously... They even gave you hints by including Zippy, *and* a free psych evaluation for when you got frustrated. :)

      XFree: Same thing.

      Let's run X WINDOWS on the PC and use it as a LOW-COST SOLUTION!!!

      You've got to realize that both of these things would be completely unrealistic for when it started. Oh, except for the fact that X on a Sun 4 was just as slow as X on a 486... The only thing scarier than that would be the X Server for DOS that I played around with for a while.

      Of course, many people are doing great work on X, XFree, Emacs, XEmacs, etc., etc. Now. Just realize when they started (Emacs is an ancient MIT project!) and how silly it must have looked back then. (ed! ed is the standard! text editor.)

      And patch is probably most responsible for forking code and saving bandwidth. In that order. Rather nominate the GPL, for preventing forking. :)
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    2. Re:My #1 by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      Emacs: Let's write a LISP INTERPRETER on top of UNIX

      Actually, I think it started on ITS.

    3. Re:My #1 by pb · · Score: 2

      Sigh. 'Emacs' did, but not the Lisp interpreter. So if we have to make a distinction, I'm not talking about 'TECO Emacs', and it sucks that they had to have the same name...

      I quote, from GNU's Emacs FAQ:

      23: Where does the name "Emacs" come from?

      Emacs originally was an acronym for Editor MACroS. RMS says he "picked
      the name Emacs because `E' was not in use as an abbreviation on ITS at
      the time." The first Emacs was a set of macros written in 1976 at MIT by
      RMS for the editor TECO (Text Editor and COrrector, originally Tape
      Editor and COrrector) under ITS on a PDP-10. RMS had already extended
      TECO with a "real-time" full screen mode with reprogrammable keys. Emacs
      was started by Guy Steele as a project to unify the
      many divergent TECO command sets and key bindings at MIT, and completed
      by RMS.

      Many people have said that TECO code looks a lot like line noise. See
      alt.lang.teco if you are interested. Someone has written a TECO
      implementation in Emacs Lisp (to find it, see question 90); it would be
      an interesting project to run the original TECO Emacs inside of Emacs.


      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  22. Great hacks by Jjaks · · Score: 3

    These are my suggestions for greatest hacks:
    1. The so called bombes, developed by polish scientists and improved by Alan Turing & co, that broke the german enigma codes during WWII. This was truly advanced stuff in those days!
    2. As was stated in the article, putting Apollo 11 on the moon is truly amazing stuff.
    3. Xerox's invention of the desktop metaphor, which was later used by Apple, Microsoft and of coursse X Windows. This way of using computers will probably be dominant for a long time yet.

    1. Re:Great Hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'll give you Suez, though it was an easier project. As for being US centered ... I did pick Mir as opposed to the space shuttle both in the spirit of internationalization, as well as, it was a better hack. H

    2. Re:Great hacks by KrAphtd1nN3r · · Score: 1

      Euh, Xerox didn't even invent the desktop metaphor. They stole it from Stanford, I think...

      --
      "Code free or die!"
    3. Re:Great hacks by erlkonig · · Score: 2

      In the beginning, there was Douglas Engelbart, and from him came the mouse, the windowed graphic user interface, hyperlinks, email, and videoconferencing -- in the 1950s and '60s, years before the Apple Lisa, Sun workstations, and other projects incited by visits to XEROX PARC in the 1970s. What most people don't know is that much considered to have happened at PARC was actually brought there by researchers from Engelbart's labs at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI).

      Diehards can repeat Engelbart's opening line from memory:

      "If in your office, you as an intellectual worker were supplied with a computer display backed up by a computer that was alive for you all day and was instantly responsive, how much value could you derive from that?"

      Then, on a gigantic movie screen, he brought this new world alive. TV cameras switched from shots of Engelbart's hands working new contraptions called a mouse and a chord keyset, in conjunction with a standard keyboard, to shots of the computer screen where Engelbart was effortlessly adding, deleting and reorganizing a grocery shopping list. Like magic, the cursor moved words and thoughts.

      The world premiere of video conferencing was a show-stopper: Talking into a director's-style headset, Engelbart punched up his colleague at SRI, 30 miles away. "Hi, Bill," said Engelbart as Bill's head filled the left corner of the screen, surrounded by text. "Now we're connected . . . let's do some collaborating." The two proceeded to work jointly on a piece of text, passing the cursor and computer controls back and forth. Engelbart and his team had invented what's now called "groupware"; 30 years later it's hard to find software that allows you to do what they did in the demo - share control of a computer screen for sophisticated collaboration.

      Read the full article .

    4. Re:Great hacks by nathanh · · Score: 1

      Xerox didn't invent the desktop metaphor. PARC took a lot of neat ideas from lots of places, added some neat hacks of their own, and put it all together in one place.

      Engelbart had a desktop metaphor of sorts literally decades before PARC.

      In fact, Engelbart must hold a record for being the sole contributor of so many incredible hacks.

  23. Mars Pathfinder by rde · · Score: 5

    The mars pathfinder was, IMHO, a truly elegant hack. It was, to coin a phrase, better, cheaper and faster than other Mars missions, it did everything it was supposed to (and more) and -- this is important -- it was cool. It landed on the planet in a big ball and bounced to a halt.
    Innovative technology and bouncing probes. Coolness epitomised.

    1. Re:Mars Pathfinder by JLCdjinn · · Score: 1

      "Innovative technology and bouncing probes. Coolness epitomised."

      **laughs a lot**

      Can I quote you on that? I really like it...

      -JLC

    2. Re:Mars Pathfinder by rde · · Score: 1

      Wow. Someone asking can they quote a /. post.
      By all means indulge yourself; if you append "this brilliantly pithy quote (C) the amazingly well-hung and erudite Robert Elliott 1999" I'd appreciate it, but it's not totally necessary.

    3. Re:Mars Pathfinder by Dave+Fiddes · · Score: 2

      The really cool thing about Pathfinder was the hack they did to patch the statically linked operating system (vxWorks - yukk, they should have used RTEMS) to fix it's priority inversion problem...on Mars!

      See here and here. What's really funny is that this problem was reported by somebody from Microsoft - problably the least Real Time aware company (after Sun and Oracle) on the planet.

  24. Worm by armb · · Score: 1

    If it was designed to do what it did, it definitely wasn't ethical. If (as seems almost certain) the massive infestation was the result of bugs, and it was not intended to spread so fast or to act as a DoS attack on infected machines, then it didn't do exactly what was required...

    --
    rant
  25. MIT Star Wars Hack... by vitaflo · · Score: 3

    Who could forget the Star Wars R2D2 "hack" of the Great Dome at MIT right before the Phantom Menace came out? I think this counts as a hack, even if it isn't computer related (it certainly is geek related). Here's some links for those who forgot this one:

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/19 99/r2d2.html

    http://slashdot.org/ar ticle.pl?sid=99/05/18/193234&mode=flat

    1. Re:MIT Star Wars Hack... by G27+Radio · · Score: 2

      The guys that perpetrate these hacks are known as the Hackers on MIT campus. The MIT campus is full of little hacks as well. (ie: graffitti somehow painted in the underground tunnels underneath pipes and high voltage conduits--I looked at this closely and it just didn't appear possible that it was done without completely disconnecting a lot of stuff.) Anyway, I think the cop car on the dome hack was better than the R2D2 hack. I have a "MIT Culture" sweatshirt with that picture on it.

      Speaking of MIT Culture, if any of the 333rd are here, just wanted to say, I was at DTYD a couple years ago and you guys rock!

      numb

  26. Certainly the best hack of this year by Dicky · · Score: 4
    The April Fools joke pulled by /. , BeDope , Segfault and User Friendly .

    Anyone who doesn't know the story should check the BeDope story, the User Friendly story, the segfault story, or one of the stories at /.

    --
    Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
    1. Re:Certainly the best hack of this year by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      I remember that and it was just obnoctious(sp). Anytime you tamper with news feeds you become no better than a communist trying to subdue a population. I can think of no good reason to do that. What if CNN started to randomly state totally incorrect information about international politics or that programming book or linux guide said the best way to improve system preformance is to use the following command:

      foolishman#cd /; rm -rf *;

      This is an extreme example however usually the more complex the information is the more difficult it can be to actually determine the difference between the truth and a lie.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:Certainly the best hack of this year by delirium_9 · · Score: 1
      "What if CNN started to randomly state totally incorrect information about international politics"

      Uh, don't they already do that? For international news, I'd take the BBC over CNN anyday.

      --
      Since your UID is smaller than mine, I can only conclude that you're trolling. -s20451 (410424)
    3. Re:Certainly the best hack of this year by EvilBastard · · Score: 1

      'Anytime you tamper with news feeds you become no better than a communist trying to subdue a population. '

      I think I can spot the person who didn't get the joke, and did the (much-duplicated) chicken little impression.

      Personally, I went 'Oh yeah, it's April 1st' , laughed my ass off at the sideshow, then went back to work.

  27. The single greatest hack ever.... by Denor · · Score: 4
    I'm surprised that nobody's come up with this one yet. This hack not only influences the computer world, but it was executed with an MIT attention to style and trickery. Everyone here's already seen it, but it needs to make the list:

    --
    -Denor
    1. Re:The single greatest hack ever.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to vote for this one. K&R had to be two of history's finest perpetrators of one of the greatest hacks of ... at least our time.

  28. Are you kidding? by acb · · Score: 1

    If anything, systems have gotten more complex, with more actual and potential security holes. With the dozens of daemons machines run these days, as well as various infrastructural mechanisms such as RPC, scripting languages, and systems made of lots of complex components interplaying with each other, security is a lot more tenuous.

    1. Re:Are you kidding? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      Even if you get in it dosn't mean you can do anything. Encryption and it's use is one of the reasons you really can't do anything. Most standard servers (think .gov, .mil and other DoD related computing environments) offered the same set of services as they did before just all the easy holes were removed. You can't tell me that say Unix security hasn't increased in the past 20 years can you? If sites are using unix as an operating system then one could easily state that system security has increased from the past. The only things we have left are DoS attacks and things with the network protocols. Most deamons actually (at least in the linux) world are not run with special priviledges or anything. Debian routinely makes things secure. Yes there are bugs but nothing in the past history (in net time) for a while has there been any problems.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:Are you kidding? by 0x25 · · Score: 1

      Encryption isn't the reason why security has improved. Better coding style and security audits involving massive man hours where people go through code and identify areas of code that can be exploited are some reasons that have improved security a great deal. Encryption only compliments the security but it will not take up the slack for improperly coded programs.

      "Yes there are bugs but nothing in the past history (in net time) for a while has there been
      any problems."

      If this is the case, then why do I have to sift through CERT advisories and Bugtraq all the time? Why am I losing what little sanity I have left trying to make sure that systems are secure? :-)

      --
      =
    3. Re:Are you kidding? by Abigail-II · · Score: 2
      You can't tell me that say Unix security hasn't increased in the past 20 years can you?

      I don't think it has. Most security holes are caused by buffer overflows. The dominant language for Unix (and other) platforms is still a language that easily allows for buffer overflows.

      Nothing has changed to prevent this.

      -- Abigail

    4. Re:Are you kidding? by Sehnsucht · · Score: 1

      Sure it easilly allows buffer overflows - but avoiding those is as simple as making sure you never overflow the bufffer! It might add a few hundred cycles here and there to do the range checking etc, but still..

    5. Re:Are you kidding? by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      but avoiding those is as simple as making sure you never overflow the bufffer!

      If it's that simple, why does it happen over and over again?

      -- Abigail

    6. Re:Are you kidding? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      You do have choice in the unix world. You can use C++, java, perl, python, sed, awk, bash, tcsh, bc, emacs lisp, vi scripts, almost anything that can be scripted, or has stored variables has the ability to become a programming language. I think there's something on unix that people can develop on that allows for tight security. You can simply have any subshell that is created from the command line just generate a restricted shell that will execute an automatic ^D statement that closes it. Then you just simply block the IP address of the individual all in one script. No fuss no muss. Really effective.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    7. Re:Are you kidding? by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      You do have choice in the unix world. You can use C++, java, perl, python, sed, awk, bash, tcsh, bc, emacs lisp, vi scripts,

      Just because you theoretically can, doesn't mean it's practical. Face it, the majority of the programs, specially those that are run with special privelidges aren't written in vi-macros or in bc. But in the same language they were written in 20 years ago.

      Mind, I'm not bashing C. However, it's low levelness does make it to have errors slip in that cause buffer overflows and hence security concerns. And the C being the dominant language for Unix hasn't changed the last 20 years. Whether other languages are available or not isn't the point - they aren't used that often.

      Whether other languages should be used more often is a different question. My opinion on that in a nutshell: for some projects: perhaps, but not everyone is willing to pay the price (speed). For other projects, it's unlikely you want anything else than C - at least for now.

      -- Abigail

    8. Re:Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errors come from people. If you are a competent programmer you should be able to do some bounds checking to avoid a buffer overflow. It is not a difficult task, many people are simply lazy.

    9. Re:Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but security holes is just a small section of what hacking really is. Remember, hacking doesn't mean "breaking into" a computer.

    10. Re:Are you kidding? by axolotl · · Score: 1

      Because programmers are stupid.

    11. Re:Are you kidding? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Because many programmers are either too lazy or too busy to bother with the bounds checking involved.
      The other common case is where they use functions which are inherently prone to buffer overflows (sprintf springs to mind), often because the more secure versions (snprintf) are not available on all systems (or, more precisely, a standard version is not available on all systems.)

    12. Re:Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on who's definition you go by and which circles you run in. I've always gone by these definitions since the early days of computing:

      cracker: Removes protections from software/hardware
      hacker: Specializes in system intrusion.
      coder: Programmer

      I don't know who came out with the stupid notion that "hacking" is just playing around with your OS and doing a little coding. Probably a bunch of posers who just thought the term "hacker" sounded cool and wanted to be described as one.

    13. Re:Are you kidding? by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      Because many programmers are either too lazy or too busy to bother with the bounds checking involved.

      The authors of Perl, sendmail, bind, and all those other applications listen in CERT bulletins are all either too lazy or too busy? Do you really think so?

      -- Abigail

    14. Re:Are you kidding? by BJH · · Score: 1


      Um... did you read the second half of my comment? Perl, sendmail and bind have to run on a HUGE range of systems. snprintf and other similar functions might either operate differently or not be available on many of those.

    15. Re:Are you kidding? by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      Are you saying you can only do boundary checking by calling special functions?

      Anyway, that would just prove my point. The dominant language of Unix systems is still the same as 20 years ago - GNU "extensions" don't change the language.

      -- Abigail

    16. Re:Are you kidding? by BJH · · Score: 1

      No. It's perfectly possible to do bounds checking manually, but it's a real pain to do that every time you deal with unverified data, not to mention that many programmers don't have security as their main consideration.
      As for snprintf, the problem is not so much that it's a GNU extension (which it's really not; many systems implement similar functions, but with slightly different syntax or results), but rather that sprintf is an ANSI standard function, which means that any ANSI-compliant compiler/C library can handle it, making it the 'default'.

      Once you get into the habit of bounds-checking unverified data, it's not so much of a problem, but this sort of stuff is not usually taught in CS courses...

    17. Re:Are you kidding? by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      As for snprintf, the problem is not so much that it's a GNU extension, but rather that sprintf is an ANSI standard function, which means that any ANSI-compliant compiler/C library can handle it, making it the 'default'.

      That's a silly argument. The "problem" isn't that sprintf is a standard, the "problem" is that snprintf *isn't*.

      Once you get into the habit of bounds-checking unverified data, it's not so much of a problem, but this sort of stuff is not usually taught in CS courses...

      That's bullshit. It's probably even more stressed in academical environments than anywhere else.

      -- Abigail

    18. Re:Are you kidding? by TeknoDragon · · Score: 2

      Some people think that you can get around stuff like that...

      with your own flavor of *nix, you can make snprintf your standard, or use your own custom library...

      So is OpenBSD a 20 year improvement? or should we start writing Linux in Java?

  29. The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The greatest hack has to be the cradle-to-grave total immersion virtual reality system created by the malevolent cyber-intelligence for the purpose of placating the human race while our life essence is farmed to fuel the Matrix's campaign of domination in the real world.

    Do you really think that is air you are breathing?

    Morpheus.

    1. Re:The Matrix by hobbit · · Score: 2

      I must disagree.

      Surely a simple lobotomy would have sufficed? In fact it would doubtless have a more elegant solution, since the whole Neo-rebellion thing could have been avoided.

      Using humans to process chemical energy into electrical, despite the laws of physics: now that was a hack!

      Hamish

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    2. Re:The Matrix by hobbit · · Score: 2

      Oops. I usually preview, honestly I do.

      I meant, of course: Creating a process by which the most efficient method of converting chemical into electrical energy involves the use of humans, despite the laws of physics: now that was a hack!

      Hamish

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    3. Re:The Matrix by Ralph+Bearpark · · Score: 2
      (We're talking about this post in case your threshold is set too high for the Parent link to work. (This is called a Bug , Rob).)

      Well, 60% of your heat is lost through your head, so they say (which is why you must wear a hat in winter boys!). A lobotomised brain would be an less active brain and thus a less prolific producer of heat energy, and those poor malevolent cyber-intelligences would be down on their quotas and have hell to pay.

      Of course, The Matrix is a fictional work and so the multi-user VR system described therein is thus not qualified to be regarded as one of the greates hacks of all time. However, interestingly, if it should turn out that The Matrix is not a work of fiction - but, say, a 1st wake-up call from Neo and crew - then all the other hacks described here become fictional works.

      Makes you think, doesn't it?

      Or not.

      Regards, Ralph.

    4. Re:The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps what we think of as the 'laws' of physics are all wrong. Ever think of that? We are in the matrix, after all.

    5. Re:The Matrix by hobbit · · Score: 2

      Well, 60% of your heat is lost through your head, so they say (which is why you must wear a hat in winter boys!). A lobotomised brain would be an less active brain and thus a less prolific producer of heat energy, and those poor malevolent cyber-intelligences would be down on their quotas and have hell to pay.

      Good point, although I can't help feeling that the simulation of earth in the late twentieth century must take up a few cycles!

      Of course, The Matrix is a fictional work and so the multi-user VR system described therein is thus not qualified to be regarded as one of the greates hacks of all time. However, interestingly, if it should turn out that The Matrix is not a work of fiction - but, say, a 1st wake-up call from Neo and crew - then all the other hacks described here become fictional works.

      Except that many of the hacks described were probably carried out before the war in question. But the crafting of the original AI which was then wiley enough to sort out the whole Matrix would probably outrank them in a slashdot poll.

      Makes you think, doesn't it?

      It certainly does. I hope the sequel peels off a few more layers (a la Existenz, which was by far the better film, IMHO).

      Hamish

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    6. Re:The Matrix by hobbit · · Score: 2

      Perhaps what we think of as the 'laws' of physics are all wrong. Ever think of that? We are in the matrix, after all.

      We'd need to be in a meta-Matrix, because it is explained to Neo when he comes out of the Matrix that his concept of reality was based on late twentieth-century earth (which they still inhabit).

      Hamish

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    7. Re:The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A labotomy wouldn't have worked. The people in the matrix aren't really there as batteries, or at least that's not their primary function. Their true function is told in the following excerpt from the short story Goliath by Neil Gaiman. When the world seemingly ceases to exist around a 19 year old kid, a agent appears in front of him and they hold a short conversation. The agent says:
      "Enemy missile took out a central processing unit," he said. "Two hundred thousand people, hooked up in parallel, blown to dead meat. We've got a mirror going of course, and we'll have it all up and running again in no time flat. You're just free-floating here for a couple of nanoseconds, while we get London processing again."
      Morpheus got it wrong. The people in the matrix are not batteries, they're processors or calculators.

      Hopefully, this will be addressed in the next two movies.
    8. Re:The Matrix by Rogain · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah man, like whow, like the Matrix, was like so uh wow-esque, dude, like its a like-mental thing, how we're all like, trapped and stuff. By like the Powers-That be and crap like that, but ya know, you gotta like, pull that plug-thing from the back of your head and like then, maybe totally live and shit.

      How could anyone possibly think anything Keanu Reaves 'acted' is was cool. His idea of acting, is adding extra uuuu's to dude or extra oooo's to whow.

      "duuuuuude!" (Meaningful squint) "whooooow!" (slowly turn head sideways)

      Give that man an OSCAR!!!!

      --
      The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
    9. Re:The Matrix by Ralph+Bearpark · · Score: 1
      Thank you so much for that link.

      Regards, Ralph.

  30. I have seen a list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone has already written such a list. I just wish I could remember where I saw it :-) It was circulated in the pre-web days. I remember one entry describing a program someone wrote that fit in ~100 bytes of spare memory on a pioneer space probe, and it discovered a new moon around Jupiter. Anybody else remember what I am talking about?

  31. I vote for Apache. by nevets · · Score: 2
    Well it did come from "A patchie program".

    My reasons:
    • longevity - people should still be talking about it 20 or 30 years later, or even beyond. social and/or technological impact - it should change some aspect of life, either by directly changing every-day life or indirectly by changing how people view the world

      Ok, so it hasn't been around for 20 or 30 years. But I believe that it will be. And did it have an impact, well there was an article on /. a little while back that said if it wasn't for Apache, then we would all be using NT servers.

    • "eleganc e" - note however, that this does not necessarily equate simplicty. (Some people may consider the Saturn V booster a truly moby hack, as it got its job done precisely well with no doubt as to its purpose, but was anything but simple.)

      Look, it was done with patches. It wasn't until they realized that they had a full web server that it became a program. How more elegant is that

    • that not-easily definable quality of "I shoulda thought of that!" A Great Hack doesn't have to be "not immediately obvious" - it
      may just be something nobody else has done yet. For example: the WWW - there's nothing "unobvious" about defining a set of page layout macros that include text and graphics and a way to transmit and view them, but it didn't become commonplace
      until Tim Berners-Lee made it a big deal.


      Hey, right after WWW became big, I should have wrote a "free" web server and I could have been famous!


    There you have it. Thats my vote for one of the Top Ten Greatest Hacks!

    Way to go you Apache guys (and gals?)!!!!!

    Steven Rostedt
    --
    Steven Rostedt
    -- Nevermind
    1. Re:I vote for Apache. by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      Problems:

      1. Centered on systems with dedicated lines

      2. Must be changed and administered as a super user.

      Note these are problems with all web servers usually and not just apache.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:I vote for Apache. by mlc · · Score: 1
      2. Must be changed and administered as a super user.

      Once, when I was using a crappy local nonprofit ISP that itself had only a 33.6 connection to the net-at-large, I installed apache (or maybe it was NCSA httpd) on some nonstandard port as a not-so-super user. It managed to convince the admins that installing httpd on port 80 was feasable and a Good Idea.

  32. The Internet Worm by Shimrod · · Score: 1

    If we're talking about hacks that are still being talked about, then how about the worm
    written by Robert T. Morris that brought down most of the Internet in 1988?

    1. Re:The Internet Worm by Psiren · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? It's already mentioned.

  33. King of the Hackers... by BNL+Psycho · · Score: 3

    MacGuyver!!!

    Who can deny the greatness of a man who can build a sports car out of nothing more than:

    • some chewing gum
    • a couple of paper clips
    • 4 AOL cd's
    • and some hairspray?

    You know it to be true...

  34. Cold war? by sufi · · Score: 1

    How about the cold war, surely one of the best hacks around?

    It did wonders for the world economy and scared the **** out of most people at the same time.

    Sure it could have lead to a complete world disaster that could have destroyed the planet, but what the hell. It was all good clean fun and kept people in jobs for years!

  35. All time great hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My favorite hacks would include:

    The linux kernel, and the work done by NASA during Apollo 13, involving the creation of a device to filter out CO2 from the air(remember, the square filter to round hole design)

  36. Top 10 of -all- time? by jd · · Score: 5
    This is difficult. Ok, I'll have it a go. These are in no particular order, despite being numbered.

    1. The roller/pulley system the Egyptians used to move those large sandstone blocks.
    2. The Viking Longboat* (This one'll take explaining)
    3. The spur
    4. The DeHaviland Mosquito** (Again, I'll explain this one)
    5. The Williams Tube (The first optical computer memory system)
    6. The Internal (Infernal?) Combustion Engine
    7. Stonehenge
    8. Sir Isaac Newton's Catflap
    9. The Printing Press
    10. The Transputer

    * - The Viking Longboat was no ordinary boat. It was designed to be sailed up a low-lying beach, picked up by the oars, and carried to where the raid was to be. Treasure could then just be thrown into the boat, by the raiders, allowing them to take more than they could possibly have done, if they'd had to shove the loot into pockets.

    ** - The DeHaviland Mosquito was an equisite hack. To improve speed and survival odds, it was built entirely out of pressed plywood, using the same techniques as the old biplanes. This was the first time anyone had tried using those principles to build a large aircraft.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by pen · · Score: 1
      The Internal (Infernal?) Combustion Engine
      Hmm... and what about the Wenkel engine? Better yet... how about the way Mazda single-handedly killed the Wenkel engine?

      --

    2. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Better yet... how about the way Mazda single-handedly killed the Wenkel engine?

      Oh look, an Amiga thread. How quaint.


      ---
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by bergie · · Score: 1

      The Viking Longboat was no ordinary boat. It was designed to be sailed up a low-lying beach, picked up by the oars, and carried to where the raid was to be. Treasure could then just be thrown into the boat, by the raiders, allowing them to take more than they could possibly have done, if they'd had to shove the loot into pockets.

      These boats had also some other things making them quite interesting hacks. For example, they were built from damp wood to make them flexible, and then tarred to keep the dampness in the timber. This enabled the (actually very small) boats to survive even quite bad weather conditions.

      There have been many attempts at building viking-style longboats in the last decades. Here in Finland, we have at least two organizations working on such projects. One of them, the Rus Project has even sailed around the Europe on their ship.

      /Bergie

      --

      --
      Midgard Project - Open Source CMS
    4. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by hedgehog_uk · · Score: 1

      The mosquito built from wood, not only to save weight, but to save metal which was in short supply.

      Transputers are still alive and well and living in Sky Digital set top boxes (and most other digital stb's)

      HH

      --
      Yellow tigers crouched in jungles in her dark eyes.
      She's just dressing, goodbye windows, tired starlings.
    5. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the DeHaviland Mosquito was designed to be built of wood as a hedge against a shortage of metal, England being an island and the Germans having the U-boat. The performance could have been obtained with other materials, e.g. look at the P-38 or the B-26 for similar aircraft.

    6. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Pope · · Score: 1

      I believe you mean Wankel
      How did Mazda kill it? They are/were the only ones using it in a consumer auto.

      Pope

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    7. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by mdvkng · · Score: 1

      > The Viking Longboat was no ordinary boat. It was
      > designed to be sailed up a low-lying beach,
      > picked up by the oars, and carried to where the
      > raid ...

      Hmmm, that's actually a new one on me. The raider version of the viking ships was, IIRC, a deep sea-going vessel that doubled as a beach landing craft. I believe a classic raider like the Gokstad ship would still be too heavy for a portage - and in any case lugging the ship around would have deprived the vikings of the quick hit and run tactics they often used.

      The Swedish vikings (Rus) did use portage-capable boats of the same "clinker" design on Russian rivers, but it was a much smaller than the North Sea raiders.

      Still, for its very design elegance, flexible construction and extreme usefulness to the intended job, the viking longship was indeed a classic hack.

      -M

    8. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by jd · · Score: 2
      The DeHaviland Mosquito was first designed nearly two years before World War II, when metal was still in plentiful supply. It was also the fastest aircraft of World War II, with the exception of some (but not all) jet aircraft.

      The Mosquito's top speed was considerably greater than that of any other propellor-powered aircraft of the time, with early models reaching speeds around 500 mph, or higher.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Eccles · · Score: 2

      It was also the fastest aircraft of World War II, with the exception of some (but not all) jet aircraft.

      Uh, no. The Mosquito was quite a nice plane, but even the fastest one -- the prototype -- had a top speed of 429 MPH. This could be exceeded by quite a number of piston-engined fighters on both sides. It was able to make quick raids, however, and in the absence of extremely quick reactions by air defense, it could escape most of the time. (Note that its top speed *is* higher than that of the modern jet-powered A-10 Warthog tank destroyer...)

      It was faster than the in-service fighters, such as the Spitfire Mark I and the BF-109D, that were in service when the Mosquito took its first flight. That may be how this whole myth started.

      The fastest propeller-driven aircraft of the war was probably the Dornier Do335, which had a reported top speed of 475 MPH. This unusual plane had a propellor at the front and the back, thus minimizing drag relative to wing-mounted engines like the Mosquito or twin-boom aircraft like the P-38. The Me-262, a jet plane, had a top speed of 540 MPH.

      The Mosquito's top speed was considerably greater than that of any other propellor-powered aircraft of the time, with early models reaching speeds around 500 mph, or higher.

      Last I saw, the world speed record for propellor aircraft was just under 500 MPH, set by a heavily modified P-51.

      (All speed ratings based on level flight, dive speeds could be considerably greater.)

      Another relevant site is here

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    10. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by braman · · Score: 1

      Just a clarification...

      If I remember my NYTimes Science Times correctly, the Egyptians didn't actually use a roller-pully system (in the sense that most people think of it) to transport stones. They did someting more ingenious, something that was only recently understood. Rather than placing logs underneath and pulling the stones long distances, they placed four arc-shaped wood devices on four sides of each block, essentially creating a huge wheel out the block. They then rolled this to the pyramids. Once at the pyramids, they used rollers and pulleys to maneuver the blocks up. Funny, it took us much longer to figure out how they moved the stones, than it took them to build the pyramids!

    11. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by EmersonPi · · Score: 1
      They didn't kill it. At least if they did, then it is undead, for it is still alive and strong... check out Moller International and Freedom Motors

      I suspect that we will see a lot more of the Wankel engine in the future...

      --
      Impossible = A fun challenge
    12. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by pen · · Score: 1
      AFAIK, they didn't want to make it "too" reliable, so they decided to make it last 60,000 miles instead of 100,000 miles by making some parts less reliable, but overdid it a bit, and the engines broke after 15,000 or 20,000 miles. Nobody wanted anything to do with Wenkel any longer.

      Then again... that voice could have been wrong.

      --

    13. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by A.S.M. · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being woefully off-topic:

      Mazda wasn't the only, and certainly not the first company to use a rotary engine in a passenger car. Mercedes and/or Aston Martin had them in the 50's for a limited time. Wish I could remember more specifically.

      As for seeing a lot more of them, I doubt it. There's a couple problems with them in today's consumer market: 1) They burn oil. (Not a lot, mind you, but it's pretty much by design that they burn some to keep the rotors lubricated) 2) Ever heard an RX-7 down the dragstrip? As the RPMs go up, Wankels get loud . 3) They tend to put out a bit more pollutants than a reciprocating engine does, and the fuel efficiency doesn't look too good compared to a piston engine of the same displacement. (Power output, on the other hand, is great, depending on how you choose to measure the displacement of a rotary engine. Technically, an RX-7 is considered a 1.3 liter engine, but in reality, it's more like a 2.6 or a 3.9, depending on who you ask.) They also tend to wear faster than a "normal" engine, requiring more frequent rebuilds (especially turbo/supercharged versions)


      As a mechanical hack, though, trying to visualize a 3-rotor (eg, Mazda 20B) engine spinning makes my head hurt. They're especially nifty for the lack of moving drivetrain parts: No valves, no cams, no timing belts...

    14. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Raven667 · · Score: 1
      >How did Mazda kill it? They are/were the only ones using it in a consumer auto.

      Exactally! Although IIRC the Wankel was designed by annother company, GM perhaps, who didn't think it was worth much and sold it to Mazda (silly Japanese) dirt cheap. Now Mazda makes the worlds only 3 chamber(?) muscle car. Those cars can be improved to several Hundred horsepower. Vroom, Vroom--Fast!

      --
      -- Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
    15. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Q*bert · · Score: 2
      I like this image a lot, but I would like it even more if they were sacking and pillaging, for full historical accuracy. ;)

      Vovida, OS VoIP
      Beer recipe: free! #Source
      Cold pints: $2 #Product

    16. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by joemiah · · Score: 1

      1. The roller/pulley system the Egyptians used to move those large sandstone blocks

      7. Stonehenge

      But we all know these two were created by aliens. Other alien accomplishments include the carved stone heads on Easter Island, the Incan temples and (of course) the creation of blue Gatorade.

    17. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out the face on mars.

    18. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      > 4.The DeHaviland Mosquito** (Again, I'll explain this one)

      Well, if you talk about airplanes, I'll say The AVRO ARROW , which offered fly-by-wire and still unmatched performance 40 years later...
      -- ----------------------------------------------
      Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!

    19. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Aussie · · Score: 1

      >You left out the face on mars.

      Nah, that was us ;)

    20. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by twinpot · · Score: 1

      It was designed by a German, Felix Wankel, hence its name. It was first used in some NSUs in the mid '60s(now part of Audi), and sold in some volume in the NSU Ro80 (which was years ahead of its time). Citroen also fitted them to their GS.

      The problem was with the rotor tip seals. These lasted only 30.000km before they were gone. This caused massive warranty claims, which led to the downfall of NSU.

      Mazda licensed the engine, and continued its development. The rotor tips seal material was changed, and this with better oils has led to much better reliabilty. Suzuki also had a rotary motorbike. The engines also go quite well in Fiat 500's, Hillman Imps etc ;-)

    21. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Maybe, but...

      What about the Orbital 2-stroke? That's way cooler. Only about 6 parts andonly a few of them move. Wonderful idea, way nicer than the (already very nice) Wankel.

      Greg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    22. Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Raven667 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing this out, I stand corrected.

      --
      -- Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
  37. Gandhi. by Moses+P.+Lester · · Score: 3

    Top 10 hack: The British Empire. Perpetrated by Gandhi in the early 20th century. He drove out one of the most powerful countries on Earth by sitting down and not eating. I'd call that clever.

    1. Re:Gandhi. by SEE · · Score: 2

      Who, then, gets credit for the liberation of Newfoundland from the British in 1949?

      The British left because the British didn't have the ability to maintain an empire after fighting for survival in WWII and then being immediately plunged into a Cold War. Although Gandhi was an admirable man, the people responsible for Indian independence were Hitler and Stalin. The same men were responsible for Newfoundland being forced to choose between indpendence or becoming part of Canada.

  38. Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    I remember reading once that when the communications systems failed on one Voyager probes, they reprogrammed the comms to use compression algorithms that were then just newly developed.

    Anyone who has ever debugged comms stuff will dig this - especially when the reset switch for the other box is on the other side of the solar system...

    dean

  39. The M16 rifle by Mister+Attack · · Score: 1

    The M16 rifle is the very definition of a hack in hardware. It is elegant, and it gets the job done extremely well, even under the most adverse conditions. Ditto for the Glock 17, which can fire underwater if need be. Two truly elegant hacks.

    1. Re:The M16 rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The design of the M16/AR-15 is "open source", making the gun almost infinitely customizable. But it's also more complex than necessary and requires extremely precise and sophisticated manufacturing techniques. And it has a number of extremely barfulous design flaws. For example, the gas operation system was designed to dump carbon fouling into the action! There are whole businesses devoted to fixing that.

      The AK-47 may not be quite as nice of a weapon in some respects, but it's a much better hack. It is bog simple, cheap, reliable, and ubiquitous. It can be made out of sheet metal without so much as power tools, much less the complex machining required for the AR-15. Its gas system and magazines - the most common points of failure on an automatic rifle - are extremely robust. Over 50 years later, the AK-47 and its derivatives are still the single most popular small arm in the world.

      If you want a technical firearm hack, the roller-l ocking action on the Heckler & Koch G3 rifle (originally the Spanish CETME) definitely counts. It's an innovative and effective solution to a common firearm design problem. (How to keep the chamber locked during firing so the gun doesn't blow up in the user's face.) The H&K MP-5 submachinegun you see in games like Rainbow 6 and Half Life uses the same action.

      As for the Glock, well... I own one. It's my favorite pistol. But a hack? No way. It's basically a 100-year-old design redone with better materials and manufacturing processes. All the technical innovations were done by someone else first. Glock just put them all together for the first time, and did a good job of marketing the result. Which is admirable, just not a hack.

    2. Re:The M16 rifle by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      Ditto for the Glock 17, which can fire underwater if need be.

      The Glock mechanism is extremely elegant--they started with first principles and along the way to a complete package they incidentally solved a lot of the problems all other manufacturers took as givens--a genuinely insightful bit of engineering. If you look carefully at the dents they leave in your primers, you can have a Zen moment understanding how the entire trigger-cock DAO mechanism operates.

      --

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    3. Re:The M16 rifle by Pope · · Score: 1

      Mmm... considering the M16 rifle has a nasty habit of jamming easily under normal firefight conditions, I would suggest the AK-47.
      The damn thing was designed 52 years ago, and is still one of the most in-demand weapons for those who need cheap, easily-fixable arms.
      I mean, you can field-strip the damn thing and replace jammed mechanisms with a rusty butterknife. It may jam, but the jam is easily fixed, which is much more elegant.

      Pope

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:The M16 rifle by ktakki · · Score: 2

      The M16 rifle is the very definition of a hack in hardware. It is elegant, and it gets the job done extremely well, even under the most adverse conditions.

      The early history of Eugene Stoner's AR-15/M-16 was riddled with problems. Close manufacturing tolerances and adverse field conditions (think Viet Nam) caused jams at the worst possible moments.

      These problems weren't really solved until the introduction of the M-16A1 with its kludgy "forward assist" (and a switch to less corrosive propellants).

      Now Mikhail Kalashnikov's AK-47: that is a hackerly weapon. Five moving parts. Stamped parts instead of milled/machined components. Stranded steel wire instead of springs. Simple to operate and maintain. Fault-tolerant. A village blacksmith can gin up a new bolt carrier/gas piston assembly if need be. It's the one weapon I'd want with me if I ever had to travel back through time.

      Kalashnikov picked some of the best features of three contemporary designs (Mp-44, M1 Garand, SKS) and hacked together a design that's still in production 52 years later.


      k.

      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    5. Re:The M16 rifle by lrund · · Score: 1
      • The M16 rifle is the very definition of a hack in hardware. It is elegant, and it gets the job done extremely well, even under the most adverse conditions.
      The early history of Eugene Stoner's AR-15/M-16 was riddled with problems. Close manufacturing tolerances and adverse field conditions (think Viet Nam) caused jams at the worst possible moments. These problems weren't really solved until the introduction of the M-16A1 with its kludgy "forward assist" (and a switch to less corrosive propellants).

      A little extra info here...

      The M16 performed very well in trials. The problem never was with the rifle itself... the bad field performance of the early M16 was due entirely to bad decisions made by the military procurement personnel trying to save a buck.

      The M16 is gas-operated. This means that the mechanism that loads another round automatically is powered by a bit of burned-gunpowder gas bled off of the barrel at a point about halfway down the barrel's length through a small "gas port". The gas goes down a small tube back to the receiver (the part of the rifle that the trigger, barrel, stock, and magazine all come together), which then operates the loading mechanism. Think of it as an air-operated tool.

      When Stoner designed the rifle, he used a quick-burning gunpowder. It was finished burning before the bullet had moved far enough down the barrel to uncover the gas port, so no unburned powder entered the gas tube. However, the procurement folks decided at the very last minute to use slower-burning gunpowder left over from older, larger rounds. This gunpowder was still burning when the bullet passed the gas port, meaning that unburned powder flakes would get into the gas port and clog it up. Eventually, the gas tube would be so clogged that the rifle would jam (not enough gas was getting through the clogged gas tube to operate the rifle).

      This is exactly the sort of thing when bean-counters who don't understand a technology mess with the technical specifications. Lesson: accountants aren't engineers. And people can die when accountants think they are engineers.

      The other part of the equation? When the M16 was first issued to field troops, they didn't issue cleaning kits with it. No means of cleaning the gunked-up mechanism was available to the soldier.

      Save a buck, lose a life.

    6. Re:The M16 rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The relative quality of the M16 and Glock not withstanding, it is my personal opinion that they are both greatly overshadowed by other hacks in the firearms industry and especially by one of the master hackers of all time, John Browning. It was John Browning who invented the gas operated action which the M16 is based on as well as the simple 1911 style recoil action that the Glock holds in its direct ancestry. The M16 and Glock are both very clever designs, to be sure, but the Browning inventions they are based on qualify as truly inspired. And for those of you who are unfamiliar with the works of John Browning, his creativity and inventiveness didn't stop with the above given examples. They are just two examples from a list that is literally too long to include here.

    7. Re:The M16 rifle by doom · · Score: 2

      According to the James Fallows book "The Nation",
      the Viet Cong were in the habit of stripping
      the corpses of fallen soldiers of anything
      remotely useful: belts, boots, etc.

      They left behind the M-16s.


    8. Re:The M16 rifle by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Good lord, yes. The M16 is a derivative and not particularly outstanding work, despite what others here claim. But John M. Browning's work has stood the test of time far longer and is the basis for all later designs (well, probably not the luger, we'll say MOST later designs anyway). Browning's concepts and designs were inspired, groundbreaking, and truly "elegant".
      --Charlie

  40. meaning by john_gault · · Score: 5

    There are a few essential elements that make up a "hack" in my mind that seem to have either been glazed over or not given due importance in the definition presented.

    A hack is performed in a situation where no tool currently exists for the job, and the custom tool winds up being built out of peices at hand (usually grossly inadequate) or completely from scratch. As much as I hate those kinds of shows, McGyver (sp?) would be a prime example of this. I can also think of numerous trail fixes while on a motorcycle or in a 4-wheel drive that were complete and total hacks, getting me back to civilization with bailing wire and duct tape.

    A hack is often performed under a time crunch, thus a large reason for the lack of documentation and/or the job being done properly. A lack of planning also seems to be a common element, but this is frequently due to the nature of completely unexplored territory -- hard to plan for what you don't know about.

    Very frequently, large amounts of caffiene and/or nicotine are involved. I really don't think I need to expound on this one.

    The job makes you incredibly proud of something that is often horribly ugly, and that the majority of other people view as something akin to magic (have no concept of how such job could possibly have been done or what was involved).

    There is something intangible about a hack that will have a different meaning for everybody. But I do think that the most important element was hit upon in the article: CREATIVITY!!!

    Can't wait to see the list and the nominees.

    1. Re:meaning by Magritte · · Score: 1
      It seems to me that in an attempt to be equitable, and equally an attempt to avoid the stigma attached to "hacking" as much of the world things of it, we've become much to vague in our definitions. From reading some of the suggested entries the only common theme seems to be things that are man made and (in the submitters opinion) interesting. I do agree that creativity is an important element, but it seems to be that we need to narrow our field of search somewhat. Was the creation of the atom bomb a hack? How about the Wright brothers building a plane?

      What really constitutes hacking? I've always thought of hacking as inventive uses of preexisting conditions to create an unusual and interesting result.

      Some of the ideas listed in other comments strike me more as inventions than hacks. Where does the delineation lie? When does something become a hack?

      Liz

      --
      -- The quality of Doubting is rare among men, and a few choice souls are born with it. --Anatole France
    2. Re:meaning by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      I think cleverness is center of it. Sure, the atom bomb was ingenious...but they had /researchers/ getting paid to work on it for quite a while. I'm not exactly sure of the history of the Manhattan project, but it would have to be some crucial inspiration of some guy to do some unexpected clever stuff to make it a hack.

      The transistor was somewhat of a hack. Bardeen and Brattain, who invented it were just given the assignment by Shockley as rote work to waste their time, so Shockley could invent it for himself. Little did Shockley know that they would actually invent the transistor (or at least create a working one). Again, I'm not sure if this is a "hack", because although two clever guys did it, they /were/ researchers and /were/ being paid to find the solution...it wasn't something unforeseen and unexpected.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  41. sj.exe by geophile · · Score: 1
    I know there aren't a lot of Java fans in the /. readership, but I nominate sj.exe, Symantec's Java compiler. Sun's compiler, javac, is unbearably slow. sj is and always has been incredibly fast, and it was available from the very earliest days of Java (1.01 or 1.02). I think it bears some responsibility for Java's success.

    I also second the nomination of Gnu emacs.

    1. Re:sj.exe by geophile · · Score: 1

      Silly me: Java itself certainly qualifies.

    2. Re:sj.exe by JLCdjinn · · Score: 0

      Where can you find sj.exe and info about it?

      -JLC

    3. Re:sj.exe by geophile · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the only way to get sj.exe is as part of Symantec's VisualCafe. My normal installation procedure is to install VisualCafe, and then delete all the gunk except for sj and the dlls it needs.

  42. Another Candidate by latifpaws · · Score: 1
    One of the greatest hacks I know is the incorporation of a LISP-like language in an application, to facilitate extensions.

    The earliest example I'm aware of is "Mock Lisp" in Gosling's Emacs, but there are probably others. A rather recent example is Script-Fu in GIMP etc.

    Anyone know where the concept originated?

    1. Re:Another Candidate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before Gosling macs there was the Lisp Machine with Zemacs and a real lisp extension language. That may have been the start. Gosmacs didn't have any ability to allocate memory though.

  43. cc hack by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    I read the cc hack page...but I don't see what is so great about it. It seemed that since the old compiler didn't yet know what a given escape was, the ascii code was substituted for it. Is that the hack?

    The replicating bugs was interesting...but I'm not sure I understood what the point was in showing it was possible to create compilers which introduced bugs. woo

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:CC hack by Neil · · Score: 1

      Kinthelt wrote:

      In the early versions of Unix, there was a hack in CC so that if someone compiled a kernel, it would insert a backdoor so Ken Thompson could log into any Unix machine! Not only that, but it could also detect if the compiler was compiling itself so it could add the backdoor-producing code into the new compiler.

      This hack get a vote from me, too. One correction: as I recall the story it was "login.c" that the compiler backdoored, rather than the kernel.

    2. Re:cc hack by thornist · · Score: 1

      "not sure I understood what the point was in showing it was possible to create compilers which introduced bugs."

      Not bugs, trojans - if deliberate. The point being that apparently "clean" source can be infected with a trojan by the program that compiles it. And even if I check the compiler code, the compiler itself could have been compiled by a compiler that spits out trojan-inducing compilers. And I cannot *ensure* that the binary compiler I first use is clean except that I trust that it is so (well unless I'm willing to sit and audit the diassembly).

      Sean - State of emergency...how beautiful to be

    3. Re:cc hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thompson's work inspired the development of computer viruses. Thompson's paper says he got the idea from an Air Force technical report, and that he later lost his only paper copy. The report in question is on the web now at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/history/karg74.p df

    4. Re:CC hack by Kinthelt · · Score: 1
      One correction: as I recall the story it was "login.c" that the compiler backdoored, rather than the kernel

      I think you are right. I stand corrected.

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    5. Re:CC hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truly scary thing about the cc hack is that it is not all that complicated. I can think of a couple of different variations on it that would be easy enough to implement. The only difficult part is recognizing the kernel code and inserting the hack in a way that behaves robustly as the kernel gets modified. I wouldn't be terribly surprised to find something like it in a compiler today. Now modifying everything else so that it can't see the hack would be a challenge:

      1) Under-reporting the size of the executable.
      2) Making gdb fail to show that code executing.
      3) Arranging for od, emacs, etc. to not show it.
      4) Having nm and strings miss it.

      Anyone who can hide a cc hack so that it can't be found has pulled off a real coup.

    6. Re:cc hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't. Thompson's cc hack was to patch cc to insert a trojan into compiled programs, compile cc, remove the code to insert the trojan, then recompile cc. That way the compiler generated bugged binaries even though the code to do it no longer existed in the cc source. So even staring at the cc source, you'd never see where the trojan was inserted, because it isn't there anymore. This has big security implications, don't you think?

    7. Re:CC hack by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      I don't think this was actually ever done, KT was saying that it was possible. Then again, it's possible to freeze boiling water by putting it on a hot stove IF all the atoms hit each other just right. However, the odds of doing this are close enought to nil as to not be worth worrying about. Same thing the the "cc hack": the odds of making such a change to the compiler that would work under every case, without introducing bugs in the compiler, are pretty low.

    8. Re:CC hack by jra · · Score: 1

      He actually did it, although it didn't make it outside the labs. Deja _used_ to have the Usenet posting wherein I quoted his email reply stating this, but damn if I can find it now.

      Cheers,
      -- jra

      Cheers,

    9. Re:CC hack by billstewart · · Score: 2

      It (probably) didn't make it outside AT&T, but it was on the tape installed by some organizations outside Bell Labs Computer Science Research. If I remember correctly, the login was "ken", and the password was "nih", as in "Not Invented Here".

      The ACM Turing Award lecture that Ken gave on it was in 198x, article was printed in CACM, Vol. 27, No. 8, August 1984, pp. 761-763, titled "Reflections on Trusting Trust".

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    10. Re:CC hack by Raven667 · · Score: 1

      You should look this up, it WAS actually done!

      --
      -- Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
    11. Re:cc hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have to trust the disassembler/debugger
      ;->

  44. Ever read 'The cuckoo's egg'? by Yogurtu · · Score: 3

    Clifford Stoll made an amazing application of ingenuity if there was one; the book about how he got the crackers is a must.
    'An intrusion? Nah, ours is a secure shop'

    1. Re:Ever read 'The cuckoo's egg'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cliff Stoll should definately be on this list. It was simply amazing reading about how he tracked the German hackers through several different networks and over several months all the while keeping his presence unnoticed. Get the book.

  45. You dont get it....Re:Hacking is dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most real hacks have absolutly nothing to do
    with computers. Using a pen spring to hold open
    a broken choke on a '74 jeep while your
    co-hacker sits on the radiator and pours gasoline
    down the carb because the fuel pump is busted too
    is a hack... No where near worthy of a top
    10 list, but a hack anyway.

    Apollo 13 as a top 10 hack? Given the state
    of the technology at the time, getting there
    was amazing. Getting back when things went
    sour was incredible.

    tmroper

    1. Re:You dont get it....Re:Hacking is dead? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      Well mechanics really don't get put on my list of people of the century as a general rule. Apollo 13 was just gross negligence on the part of people who should have anticipated the worst. We really wasted our time going to the moon so many times and not going to someplace like mars or getting an accurate idea about life on other planets.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:You dont get it....Re:Hacking is dead? by locrian · · Score: 1

      I can't exactly agree with you here... Going to the moon was the first logical step in our continuing exploration of space. Mars is simply too far away for travel at our current level of technology. Until we discover a better way to get around in space, then we're pretty much stuck, because most people aren't willing to spend 5 years in a capsule to get there, and another 5 back. As far as the Apollo 13 mission goes, yes I believe that was one of the greatest hacks of all time, it was an amazing feat of ingenuity. One can only hope that more hacks like this will occur in the new millenium.

      --
      A flute with no holes is not a flute.
  46. Great Hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll second Perl and the Constitution. I'll add, the Panama Canal and the Hoover Dam, the Mir Space station (OK, it's falling apart, but it was cool for it's time of inception), pennecillin (sp??). Just for good measure, cracker jack, Jolt cola and caffinated penquin mints;) H

  47. hmmmm..... Interesting by GC · · Score: 3

    Actually you'll probably find that the top ten "hacks" as C|Net define them have not yet been discovered.

    If your "hack" is discovered then it obviously wasn't very good :)

  48. Perl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perl is probably the most elegant language of all time - not so much how it looks (modem line noise, et al) but in how easy it is to get stuff done in it.

    That "there's more than one way to do it" for pretty well EVERYTHING is the window into Perl's elegance.

    It took English to produce a Shakespere - and Perl is the English of programming languages.



  49. A most revolutionary hack... by Fushi · · Score: 1

    Whether you're pro Windows, pro Mac, or anti both, you've got to admit that Steve Wozniak had one of the greatest hacks of all time with his Apple I. Without it, chances are no one would be reading this besides large corporations. His hack put the computer in the hands of common men. It definatly fits the quality of having a lasting effect on people.

    --
    -- "Our job is not to make the incredible possible. Our job is to make the impossible credible."- Jerry Olivieri
    1. Re:A most revolutionary hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the Apple I was't all that revolutionary. It was too hard to use for the common man. But, the Apple ][ was the revolutionary one. Apple sold it up until 1993. Now, I call that a long time to go before becoming obsolete(even though it was already obsolete by 1980). Plus, Woz's floppy disk drive is the number 1 hack. It allowed a floppy drive to be produced chaeply.

  50. GLQuake by BitPoet · · Score: 2

    Made by John Carmack in a day on a bet.

    Makes me think, "damn, that guy is good"

  51. DEBUG.COM by redelm · · Score: 2


    Yes, it's from Microsoft. No, this isn't flamebait. Paul Allen's DEBUG.COM remains to this day IMHO the best software MS has ever produced.

    Runner up: the F0 0F bugfix.

    -- Robert

    1. Re:DEBUG.COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul Allen's DEBUG.COM???????

      I've got the 86-DOS documentation with a section on
      DEBUG.COM - which happens to be based on Seattle
      Computer's ROM monitor.

      The credit belongs to Tim Patterson - original author of
      86/MS-DOS.

  52. Turk182 by september · · Score: 1

    This is one of the forgotten hacks.

    1. Re:Turk182 by Spatch · · Score: 1

      Zimmerman flew! Tyler knew!

      What a wacky movie that was for its time. Presented some good ideas, too, as far as hacks go -- but in the strictest MIT definition, they wouldn't be hacks, just plain vandalism (property damage, no easy way to remove the changes.)

      Still, one guy who can deface an entire subway car sitting yards away from a public gathering can't be all that bad.

      Oh, and that "10 Tricks For The Digital Prankster" article is horrid and obviously written on a slow news day. The electronic equivalent of someone removing your textbook cover in Junior High and putting it back on upside down.

      Kids! Here's how to be a great digital prankster! Change people's Windows password! Take them off your ICQ list! Oh, the hilarity!!

      Sheesh.


  53. 1541 Music by Nipok+Nek · · Score: 1

    Now, perhaps the TRS-80 croud had something like this as well, but I KNOW that there was a program for the Commodore 64 called "1541 Music" that allowed you to reprogram the 1541 Disk Drive to play "Daisy" (A-la H.A.L. from 2001) by slamming the Read/Write head against the hard stop at different frequencies. I know this, because I ran it at our school's computer lab back in the day when a computer lab was 10 C-64's and 2 1541 Disk drives (Ooooh, networking!) The teacher about had a heart attack :)

    Nipok_Nek

    --
    Why choose white shoes?
    1. Re:1541 Music by RobSweeney · · Score: 1

      TRS-80 games used to use the cassete port for sound. Another way to get sound out of the Trash-80 (model 1 at least, I think the others had more shielding) that we tried was to put an AM radio near the console and try different combinations of BASIC instructions inside loops. You could actually get decent spaceship effects this way.

      The ultimate sound hacking I've seen involved playing music on... a Datapoint high-speed line printer - different bands of characters made different sounds. You do go thru most of a box of greenbar for each tune, but what a way to waste paper..

    2. Re:1541 Music by drwiii · · Score: 1
      More surprising was that the 1541 Music hack also worked (though more quietly :-) on the later released 1571s.

      --

  54. Phillip Dick by Artie+FM · · Score: 1

    Gee, I've always thought Phillip Dick was the greatest hack of all time.

    And when talking of hacks, who could forget
    Piers Anthony, the hack that keeps hacking.

    --
    Be insightful. If you can't be insightful, be informative.
    If you can't be informative, use my name
    1. Re:Phillip Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Item. One of the most effective forms of industrial or military sabotage limits itself to damage that can never be thoroughly proven - or even proven at all - to be anything deliberate. It is like an invisible political movement; perhaps it isn't there at all. If a bomb is wired to a car's ignition, then obviously there is an enemy; if public building or a political headquarters is blown up, then there is a political enemy. But if an accident, or a series of accidents, occurs, if equipment merely fails to function, if it appears faulty, especially in a slow fashion, over a period of natural time, with numerous small failures and misfirings- then the victim, whether a person or a party or a country, can never marshal itself to defend itself. --Philip K. Dick, "A Scanner Darkly" The parallel of this quote to the MS-Windows "experience" is truly frightening!

  55. True Innovations by jabber · · Score: 2

    Things like VNC deserve to be on the list. As do some other truly innovative tools. PGP comes to mind. That single-chip WWW server that we slashdotted about two months back.

    A port of Linux to a Rolex would be nice too. Linux on anything analog..

    We really should extend our definition of 'hack' to beyond the computer realm, at least for a top-ten list.

    While not hacks in the computer sense, the practical jokes that go on at MIT also deserve mention. I mean, turning buildings into giant VU meters for a concert... That's just plain COOL.

    Mars Pathfinder (and Apollo 13 while out there).

    The Blair Witch Project was a great hack. Both in the 'crude' sense of the word (badly made movie) and in the 'tweak' sense of the word, since the marketting was so subversive as to make many people BELIEVE it was a documentary.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  56. Mars Pathfinder/Sojourner Rover by Archeopteryx · · Score: 2

    I think a great hack was debugging the code in the Mars Pathfinder/Sojourner Rover after the vehicles had deployed on Mars. This was possible because the debugging tool had been built into the final software load and sent along. Running a debugging session with a many-light-minute delay loop was a really bold thing to do.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
  57. War of the Worlds! by cswiii · · Score: 2

    This famous sci-fi radio broadcast had everyone in America running for their lives, fearing an alien invasion... was probably a catalyst that produced increasing realism in the genre as well.

  58. The GPL by jbuchana · · Score: 1

    The GPL should definately be on this list.

    --
    Jim Buchanan
  59. The program that ran past the end of the drum by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen it mentioned and don't know a good link for it, but I have heard this one from several sources.

    Something about the code for a program being put on a drum that the computer would read. One guy had code that did a jump that noone could figure out why it was doing that, but the code worked fine.

    Turns out, where the code needed to jump from one part to another was right where the end of the drum and beginning met, therefore it kinda just ran into the needed code.

    1. Re:The program that ran past the end of the drum by jbuchana · · Score: 1

      "The story of Mel, the real programmer"

      From ESR's Jargon File and "The New Hacker's Dictionary"

      --
      Jim Buchanan
    2. Re:The program that ran past the end of the drum by Dicky · · Score: 2

      You'd be meaning The Story of Mel then...

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
  60. Perl by slim · · Score: 2

    .. because sh/ksh/csh are *evil* for anything more than a very simple job. The bugs that creep into shell scripts are subtle, and sometimes don't show up for years.

    .. but of course, you can also write buggy Perl.

    I think the "beads" piece at the start of the (Camel|Llama) book (I forget which), sums it up -- Larry combined the "awk bead", the "sed bead", the "shell bead", a few other influences, and came up with a new bead which was more powerful than the sum of the other beads.

    It was a great hack, and the Perl community has done a great job of taking the hack, and fixing the problems which came about as a result of its hacky beginnings.

    --

  61. Mechanical Hacks... by costas · · Score: 5

    ...someone had to give at least one:

    The SR-71 Blackbird. It may not be a "classical" hack, 'coz Lockheed's Skunk Works had an unlimited budget to throw at the problem, but considering the technology at the time, it kicked some ass... Some stats, for the non-plane freaks out there:
    * Total time it took to design it and built a prototype: 6 (or maybe 8?) months. There are software programs out there that took a lot longer than that ;-)
    * It still (~40 years later) holds the title for the fastest *production* aircraft out there (err... at least non-classified ;-) Mach 3.62 is nothing to sneeze at...

    If you don't dare consider an airplane (i.e. a complete system) as a hack, consider the following:
    * The damn thing was almost entirely built of titanium alloy --only material available back then that could handle the temperatures involved. Problem: noone before was able to machine titanium. The Lockheed guys built an entire machine shop from scratch.
    * Titanium, as any metal, expands when heated: the planes had to have 'seams' in the wings that were closed when the sheetmetal expanded: the SR-71 leaked fuel (120 octane fuel) while parked on the runway!
    * The Pratt&Whitney (I think) folks had to come up with an engine that could change modes of operation in mid-flight: they made the first and only combination turbojet-ramjet engine. The Lockheed people had to make them work at any angle of attack. Yeah, it's esoteric, but the implementation is a tour-de-force to this day.
    * The poor Russians had no way to intercept these aircraft although they knew they were flying overhead and photgraphing everything (at Mach 3.62 the SR-71 could outrun any rocket or bullet at the time, and I it still can). So they build the all-steel Mig 29 (another great aircraft). But the -29 was too damn heavy to fly as high as the titanium-only -71, so the Soviets flew formations of -29s *under* the -71 to obstruct its camera's view...

    I highly reccommend the excellent "Skunk Works" book to anyone impressed by this... I just don't think most of the /.ers will care ;-(...

    I guess I have to put in a computer hack as well. Hmmm... : FSP (yeah, that's an 'S').

    engineers never lie; we just approximate the truth.

    1. Re:Mechanical Hacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the sr71 has only ones been locked by another planes radar a swedish pilot did it by accelerating like a mad man after it and just before the planes reacht its highest he got a lock and i think he took a photograph .. later on they got a call from the states congratulating him for beeing the first one to do it

  62. my top ten list by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

    1. The Macintosh
    2. Linux
    3. Woz's floppy drive(the first one that didn't cost an arm and a leg, if you don't know how it worked, then you are no longer nerd.)
    4. The Alto
    5. Pong. It's just PONG. hail PONG
    6. BSD
    7. ARPANet
    8. L0pht crack
    9. The Blue Box
    10. the RISC architecture

    --

    HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
  63. I think you left out one small one by mithrandr · · Score: 1

    What about the intermingling of those amino acids that resulted in the first single celled organisms on the face of the earth. I think that was truly unique, especially since it had never been done before (on this planet)...

    1. Re:I think you left out one small one by Pont · · Score: 1

      >especially since it had never been done before (on this planet)...

      Bzzzt. Actually, life probably started and got squished several times (according to all of my earth-science education, anyhow). We're just the lucky ones who started evolving AFTER the meteors stopped raining down so often.

      So are we a clever hack by God? Let's see anyone else write a self-replicating, self-rewriting, evolving program when the only tools available to you are different flavors of mud.

  64. The Worm authors were not intelligent by devphil · · Score: 2

    First, to Shimrod: you didn't finish reading the main article before you posted, did you? The author specifically mentioned this already.

    Second, to everybody: the Worm did not show any wizardly understanding of how everything worked. Gene Spafford (yes, /the/ spaf) wrote a couple of analysis papers of the Worm, after the code was decompiled. (His homepage is http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/homes/spaf/ if you want to download the paper(s).) One of his conclusions was the author(s) didn't really understand what was going on, because so much of the code was buggy, broken, or "dead" (i.e., unreachable). It is likely that a number of other people wrote the small intelligent bits, and that Morris (or whomever) just glued them all together.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:The Worm authors were not intelligent by Shimrod · · Score: 1

      I did actually read the article, but I missed that part, sorry.
      I have the bad habit of skipping lines that don't look interesting when I'm reading fast :-)

    2. Re:The Worm authors were not intelligent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is likely that a number of other people wrote the small intelligent bits, and that Morris (or whomever) just glued them all together." So in other words, the Internet Worm was 'hacked' together? This particular hack made the cover of TIME magazine and we're still talking about 11 years later....

    3. Re:The Worm authors were not intelligent by devphil · · Score: 2

      You /really/ need to read the analysis papers. The gluing together was down in an extremely stupid fashion.

      I'm not denying that the Worm was impressive or noteworthy; it surely was. But I take issue with the article's statement that it showed understanding of how things work.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  65. CC hack by Kinthelt · · Score: 2
    Is the CC hack mentioned the same one as the famous "backdoor" introduced by Ken Thompson? I tried reading the article, but it didn't make much sense.

    In the early versions of Unix, there was a hack in CC so that if someone compiled a kernel, it would insert a backdoor so Ken Thompson could log into any Unix machine! Not only that, but it could also detect if the compiler was compiling itself so it could add the backdoor-producing code into the new compiler. Whew! Now that is some pretty complicated stuff. And oh-so-cool.

    Kind of leaves you thinking if there is something like that left in software today...

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

  66. Dolby Pro-Logic by tobyl · · Score: 1

    Pro-Logic surround sound was (and still is) a slick hack. 4 analog channels folded into 2, and non-Pro-Logic equipment treats it as a normal stereo signal.

  67. The first Jeep was designed and built in 49 days by mojaka · · Score: 1

    I just saw this on TV. It was amazing what a small auto company was able to do with spare parts. The Jeep exceeded ALL expectations and become ubiquitous throughout all land operations from WWII until the Gulf War and the introduction of the HUMV.

  68. One of my favorites by chroma · · Score: 3
    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
  69. Trojan Horse! Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Zapd · · Score: 1

    What about the Trojan Horse? The original one, used to capture the legendary city of Troje(sp?).


    ..ofcourse it's not clear if it really happened, so in that case I'll nominate the person who first made up the Trojan Horse story.

    --
    The imp hits!
    1. Re:Trojan Horse! Re:Top 10 of -all- time? by Tower · · Score: 1

      Troy... it was Troy...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  70. CP-67 by Xenu · · Score: 1

    This was an IBM 360/67 operating system that supported multiple guest operating systems running on virtual IBM 360s. It was the predecessor of VM/370. Users could run multiple versions of different operating systems and develop/debug new operating systems on a single machine. Tom Van Vleck wrote The IBM 360/67 and CP/CMS, a short history of the system.

  71. ERM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is fucking boring. Slashdot - wake the hell up.

    -------yaaaaaaaankee

  72. The Ultimate Hack by VideoGuy · · Score: 2
    According to the definitions above, a hack is something quick & simple yet has a serious impact. In some cases it's humorous. It's usually computer/engineering related.

    How about Microsoft's hack to stop Windows 3.x from running on top of DR-DOS.

    It must have been very easy. It had a huge impact on DR & Novell. I'm sure the guys in Redmond thought it was funny.

    1. Re:The Ultimate Hack by townmouse · · Score: 1

      That wasn't quick or simple. MS took a lot of effort to put a number of bugs in Windows. Read the emails in the DOJ case.

      --
      Ask me if I've been required to disclose any crypto keys.
    2. Re:The Ultimate Hack by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I'm sorry to let facts spoil your blissful ignorance, but that hack was in a beta version, and was disabled in the release version.

      So it didn't have a "huge" impact on DR, although it might have induced fear in a few beta testers...

  73. Rotation of Willy's Statue by RebornData · · Score: 4

    This is definitely an "MIT-style" hack- it does not involve computers, but is firmly embedded in the folklore of Rice University.

    The Rice Campus is built around a large, open "quad" surrounded by six of the major buildings on campus. In the center of the quad is a statue of William Marsh Rice, who provided the money for the school to get started. The statue is a slightly life-sized bronze of "Willy" sitting in a very large chair. I'm sure it weighs several tons, and is on top of a square stone bier over six feet tall which allegedly contains WMR's remains. (See here for a picture).

    One morning in the late 80's, the students awoke to discover that Willy's statue had been perfectly rotated 180 degrees, with no trace of the equipment used to do it.

    It turns out that a group of engineering and architecture students had built some sort of inexpensive tripod-like "crane" that was lightweight, portable, and could be assembled *very* quickly. There were some nice subtlelties to the hack:

    1. The entire rig could be carried in the back of a pickup

    2. Willy is illuminated by a bright mercury vapor light at night. The students started turning the light off at 2:00am for a week prior to the planned rotation to reduce suspicion.

    3. Before the actual rotation, the students did a practice run on a previous night, where the statue was simply lifted a couple of inches off the pedestal and set back down again. Which means they effectively got away with it twice.

    One of the more humorous parts of the story was about what happened afterwards. The administration was *not amused*, and hired a professional contractor to turn the statue back around. The contractor damaged the statue in the process, and the university billed the students for the whole thing.

    Of course, they didn't have any money, so they created a tee-shirt about the rotation. They sold so many that they not only paid the bill, but netted an additional $7,000.

    Today, the statue is firmly anchored to it's base.

    Can any other Rice alums fill in the details I missed?

    1. Re:Rotation of Willy's Statue by The+Visiting+Priest · · Score: 1

      Amazing (and amusing)!

      The administration should have hired the students to rotate it back!

    2. Re:Rotation of Willy's Statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      My favorite detail of this story is about how they tracked the campus police for weeks to see if they could determine their movements. Eventually, they found that there was a time in the middle of the night when all of the campus police left campus on a break. Things go a lot better when there is nobody around to catch you.

    3. Re:Rotation of Willy's Statue by NightParrot · · Score: 1

      I took that semester off, so this is Nth hand. It got written up in Sallyport years later, which might be a somewhat more reliable source for details.

      I think this is the first I've heard of "getting away with it twice". I understood that the dress rehearsal, conducted well away from the site, hoisted a Honda belonging to one of the perps.

      They came very, very close to getting away clean. The campos made the scene in time to catch the very last guy out of the quad, so he was going to get stuck with the check alone, before the T-shirts bailed him out and then some. Conspiracies being what they are, I'm sure plenty of people know who was involved, but I don't know that any of the other perps were ever publicly exposed.

    4. Re:Rotation of Willy's Statue by gregstoll · · Score: 1

      More background: Willy's Statue faces Lovett Hall, which is the administration building that houses the President's office, etc. I think (this was heard from my dad, who taught at Rice when this happened) that the group of students got annoyed with the administration, so they turned Willy around so he would no longer be facing them!

  74. Music from a C64 Datasette by B1 · · Score: 1

    To me, a true hack is when somebody figures out how to use hardware and software to do things it isn't supposed to be able to do.

    I once found a C64 program in Compute's Gazette that could play audio casettes using the Datasette tape deck.

    Somehow, the program was able sample the audio recording, and play it back through the SID chip. As you might expect, the sound was pretty scratchy and terrible, but the fact that it worked at all was pretty impressive.

  75. That reminds me, Mitsubishi Zero by georgeha · · Score: 3

    The Mitsubishi engineers wanted a certain level of performance out of his Zero, mostly very high maneuverability. They found that they couldn't make his design because using the materials handbooks, it would end up too heavy.

    So they bypassed the engineering materials handbooks, retested the materials they wanted to use, discovered some were underrated in the handbooks, and designed the Zero.

    When the Allied forces tried to reverse engineer the Zero, they discovered it was an impossible plane, it performed better than it was physically possible. But then, they used the old handbooks.

    I recall reading this in an old Air and Space Magazine, but no luck finding a link.

    Bonus airplane hack,the P-51.

    One, the wing.

    Wind tunnel tests showed that for certain shaped airfoils, laminar flow could be maintained far back along the wing, resulting in much decreased drag. The Mustang has these wings, giving it less drag, higher speed and greater range. Of course, they had to be kept clean of bugs and debris.

    Two, the radiator.

    The radiator/oil cooler was positioned to add a little more thrust to the plane, cool air came in the front, removed heat from the oil, became hotter, and became a primitive jet engine.

    George

  76. Doug Englebart JCC 1968 by guarache · · Score: 1

    In one 90-minute presentation at the Joint Computer Conference in San Francisco on 9 December 1968, Doug Englebart and his team from SRI simply turned the computing world upside-down. Not only did that demo introduce the computing world to many great Englebart innovations, but it presented an even more radical concept: the computer as a tool to augment an individual human being's ability to manage the increasing complexity of his/her world. My vote for the top 10 great hacks of all time.

    --
    ...disavow all knowledge...
    1. Re:Doug Englebart JCC 1968 by sushi · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree - the WIMP GUI has revolutionised the usability of computers for the majority of people (those who don't like command-line interfaces).

      --
      --- cut: Eat well, exercise, die anyway.
  77. How about the fugo? by substrate · · Score: 2

    During World War II after the attack on Pearl Harbour the Japanese were a bit annoyed that the US could attack the Japanese mainland but Japan couldn't reciprocate. It wasn't logistically possible to mount a traditional attack against the United States. Japan did know of the jet stream while America and its allies did not. The way they exploited it is a macabre but grade A hack.

    They started a cottage industry building balloons from rice paper and potato based glue. These 32 foot balloons were filled with lighter than air hydrogen gas and released. Inside the balloons were a series of aneroid barometer controlled switches which would fire off in series whenever the balloon fell below a certain altitude. The first N switches dropped ballast allowing the balloon to rise again and continue on down the jet stream. The last switch would drop incendary devices as well as ignire a demolition charge to destroy any evidence.

    Japan's intention was to start massive forest fires. Fortunately they didn't quite understand the climate on the west coast and were launched during the rainy season. Only a few people were ever harmed by these balloons.

    This is (as far as I know) not common knowledge. The American media agreed with the Military to suppress information about the balloons. After a minister's wife and five kids were killed by one of the balloons some information was released. They needed to avoid a mass panic however, they were worried that panic would result from fears of anthrax laden balloons raining down on US cities.

    1. Re:How about the fugo? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      It has been also speculated that the rather precise altitude-maintaining devices used on those balloons meant that they were ultimately intended for biological warfare, as apparently, spreading biological agents needs to be done from a very specific altitude.
      -- ----------------------------------------------
      Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!

    2. Re:How about the fugo? by BJH · · Score: 1

      I saw a documentary here in Japan about those balloons (although I think it was a dubbed American documentary). It showed a monument somewhere in the Northwest that gave the name(s) of the only person (people?) to be killed on the U.S. mainland by Japanese weaponry.

  78. Harvard Story by Rabbins · · Score: 5

    This could be a damn urban legend, so maybe someone can help me... but I remember a story of a student at Harvard that for his Senior Research Project decided to do an experiment based on Pavlov's beahvioral conditioning.

    Essentially, for 2 months in the summer he got up early in the morning, donned a black and white shirt and walked over to the fields with a large bag of bird seed while blowing a whistle. Of course he was very well loved by the birds of Massachusetts. He stopped right before football season officially started.

    So on the opening game of the year, the referees get on the field, blow the whistle and 100's of birds descend down onto the field. The game is delayed for around 20 minutes just to get all of them off.

    Beautiful in its simplicity... "Wish I had thought of that"

    If it ever really happened.

  79. The Musical Scanner by sterno · · Score: 2
    On the HP ScanJet 4, the scanner would make different tones as it was scanning based on the speed and direction that the scan light was moving. Some engineer at HP then took this and released software (I think it came with the scanner) that would cause it to play music using the movement of the scanner to generate the notes.

    ---

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  80. Starwar and ITS by Jonas+�berg · · Score: 2

    I'd say that Starwar and ITS are among the top 10 hacks, not counting the numerous non-computer related hacks.

  81. Aviation by topher1kenobe · · Score: 2
    Aviation as we know it today started as a hack. Two guys in a bike shop made something that could carry a man through the air.

    Aviation continued to be one giant hack for many years after that. For a time, no two airplaces were alike, because they were all built by different guys, in their barns.

    In Charles Lindberg's autobiography "We", he mentions how he used to fly around the US, and one day in the fall crashed in a farmers field, and broke his prop. He spent the winter living with that farmer, and bought a beam from his barn and carved another prop with his jack knife, and flew away in the spring. *THAT* is a hack.

    --

    yadda

  82. A great early hack by Niko. · · Score: 1

    I nominate Archimedes' use of mirrors, lenses, and sunlight to burn the Roman fleet at Syracuse.

    Also, does cracking the Enigma machine qualify? It was an incredible achievement and of huge importance, but is it a hack or just applied research?

  83. Internet Worm by maroberts · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, Robert Morris' Internet Worm was an accident rather than planned i.e. he did not plan on his program stuffing the net, merely generating useful info back to him.

    Anyone know the full story or got a link to it?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Internet Worm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, you're a jerk.

  84. Apollo 13 by Narf+Narf · · Score: 1

    I have to second the above nomination of Apollo 13 as one of the greatest hacks of all time. The ingenuity involved in keeping those people alive and getting them back to earth with the spare parts they had is intense. Many people can take soemthing apart and make something else out of it, but how many can do this while leaeving its original function intact and the people inside it alive, from sevreal hundred thousand miles away?

    --

    "There's one born every minute." - Steve Case
  85. Emulation by slim · · Score: 3
    Emulation never ceases to impress me, especially when the host is an unconventional platform, or the emulated system is obscure, or the emulated system is new enough to be considered "unemulatable".

    So:
    • MAME in general, for completeness, and for the insight involved in realising there was enough overlap for it to make sense to put so many systems into one executable.
    • Mame ported to a Kodak digital camera! Silly, and therefore a great hack.
    • xzx, since it was the first emulator I saw (running on a Sun Sparc), and I thought it was phenomenal.
    • That Spectrum emulator for PSX, written without official PSX dev tools.
    • UltraHLE, for being better than the real thing.


    Any others I've missed?
    --
  86. my own stupid hack at 12 years by ywwg · · Score: 1

    I was in a store that had a touch-screen monitor that printed out coupons. I noticed that when people used it the hourglass was the same for windows 3.1. So I touched the screen in the upper-left where the close button was... and the computer exited to DOS. It was funny watching people go up to the coupon machine that only said

    C:\>

    And tried to figure out what to do....

    1. Re:my own stupid hack at 12 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to have your children! - Babe

    2. Re:my own stupid hack at 12 years by Anonymous+Bastard · · Score: 0

      ..and you're still stupid!

  87. The original Trojan Horse by Oddyssee by Ping1400 · · Score: 1

    Genius hack that changed the result of the war between the Greek and the Trojans.

    In fact there a numerous battles and wars won because of some unexpected hack. Some made history.

    --
    -- Fur is worn by beautiful animals and ugly people
    1. Re:The original Trojan Horse by Oddyssee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Trojan Horse was the original and greatest hack of all time. It ended a ten year war for crying out loud! People still talk about it and the phrase is used world-wide in terms of hacking still...

  88. I nominate... by Shotgun · · Score: 2

    AOL's use of a buffer overrun to block MS clients from using their servers. They used what was at hand in a creative and unconventional way to get a job done. You may not agree with the job that was performed, but you have to admit that it was a sly hack the way AOL did it.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  89. The Trojan Horse! by Rabbins · · Score: 5

    I can't believe no one has suggested that yet (or maybe they have and I missed it).

    Despite all the myths, that most likely really did happen, and would have to go down as one of the greatest hacks of all time.

  90. BDS (Brain Damage Software) C by Xenu · · Score: 1

    This was a C compiler for the 8080/Z-80 running CP/M and was written by Leor Zolman. It was unbelievably fast and useful. It was the first microcomputer C compiler that many people used. It was inexpensive, reliable and beautifully designed. It was a perfect match to the hardware of the day.

    1. Re:BDS (Brain Damage Software) C by Xenu · · Score: 1
      An interesting interview with Leor Zolman can be found here.

      By the way, BDS C ran on 2-4 MHz CPUs with 32-64K (kilobytes, not megabytes) of RAM.

    2. Re:BDS (Brain Damage Software) C by bSMfh+(bastard+Scout · · Score: 1

      yeah baby--I started C on BDS C.
      It was a great platform. Still have the 3-ring binder with the op-art color photo too, I think.
      Leor should be on the list!
      It sure beat the hello out of Z80 assembler!!
      --willydog

  91. Suez canal by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1
    has precedence. Same engineer (Ferdinan de Lesseps (sp)) Stop being american-centered. Thanks.

    --

    1. Re:Suez canal by BitPoet · · Score: 1

      IIRC The Suez was fairly easy to do. Relatively short canal connecting two large bodies of water that were at about the same level. Only had to cross dry, flat desert.

      The Panama Canal had to go over mountains, through a tropical rainforest. They had problems with mudslides, malaria, building a lock system, and many other things.

      de Lesseps started the Panama canal, and gave up. He was basically a celebrity at the time because of the Suez.

      The Panama canal was built because there was almost a complete misunderstanding of the challenges involved. Ran _way_ over budget and time.

      disclaimer: I'm writing all this from recollection. Feel free to refute me.

    2. Re:Suez canal by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1
      Not only it went over budget, but many companies and government collapsed in France at the time. There was also some ranchor as the french who invested in it never get any money back, while the americans got all the benefits.

      --

    3. Re:Suez canal by runestar · · Score: 1

      The panama canal was built by the Americans using some of the equipment left abanadoned by the French. Yes the Americans basically went in and hacked a country out of Columbia. Only 1 person and one donkey was killed in the Panamanian Revolution... Yes the Americans then did commence building a canal. But unlike the french who wanted to dig the entire canal down to sea level. The Americans used a system of locks and a man made lake to make the canal.

      French entrepreneur Ferdinand de Lesseps envisioned La Grande Tranchee ("the great trench") as a sea-level canal without locks, akin to the one built by the French at Suez. Lesseps built the Seuz. I believe he never had a day of engineering schooling. He failed building the panama canal and nearly bankrupted France in the process. He went from hero to failure in the eyes of the french.


      The reason the Americans suceeded, where the french failed, were many. One they wanted it more. They needed a quicker route to get their warships between oceans. 67 days around the cape was not good enough for them. Secondly they fought the mosquitto problem. Thus ending epedemic deseases in the area. Lastly the Americans were using a lock system that used the power of water itself to open and close.

      Before I bore everyone to death.. Probably already happened. During WWII there was even a plan in place that if the canal was taken by the Axis powers or about to be taken, it would be drained and damaged beyond repair by the weight of the water itself.. basically they would open all the locks and let the water drain out in one massave flood.
      Runestar

  92. Stonehenge - Really Big Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its big, tells you where and when the sun will rise, it is a circle, simple and elegant, took alot of very careful effort to build, and may be over 4000 years old by some studies.

  93. The MIT birdseed football hack by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a book, possibly now out of print, which I might still have my copy of, which details some great MIT and CalTech hacks. My favorite, for elegance and simplicity, was someone who visited the football field regularly in the off-season with birdseed and a whistoe. He'd blow the whistle and toss out birdseed.

    The birds became conditioned to expect good food, and lots of it, whenever they heard the whistle.

    Now along comes the first football game of the season. And the first referee blows the first whistle...

    --

  94. The 1st virus, Von Neumann and self-compiling by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    I am too lazy to find references but I will include:
    - The first computer virus. Self-replicating code that goes memely from program to program. Or was it from disk to disk? Was it inspired by Core Wars or independent? It had to be very tight. It was not useful but...
    I second that RTM worm as well.
    - Von Neumann architecture, I mean stored program instead of hardcoded. The program is data.
    - The process (first in Algol, Pascal?) by which you program a minimal compiler in assembler, and, from then on, you code the compiler in the high level language until you have it full.

    --

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:The 1st virus, Von Neumann and self-compiling by tamyrlin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it would be much easier to program a minimal interpreter in assembler.

      Most programmers would have scant problems coding an interpreter from scratch. A compiler however is a different beast, and you wouldn't want to do that in assembler if you could avoid it...

      Anyway, I think the first compiler was one of the most important computer related hacks of all time.

  95. The Dam Busters by pq · · Score: 5
    Okay, this is late and will never float up to the +4 area, but I think this one's a neato:

    During WWII, they had these Lancaster bombers fly low (60 ft) at night, and launch a spinning cylindrical bomb towards the base of German dams in the Ruhr valley. Thse bombs would bounce on the water (like skipping stones - Tiddlywinks, anyone?), skip over the nets and anti-torpedo lines, and finally sink down to the foot of the dam before exploding.

    Ethical issues aside - we could argue the morality of busting dams to flood the Ruhr valley, but I won't - this is a supremely ingenious implementation of technology to get around an obstacle... I nominate the Dam Busters as one of the best hacks ever.

    --
    "I will take the Ring," he said, "though I do not know the way."
    1. Re:The Dam Busters by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      The other neat thing about the Dam Busters was the "optical altimeter". They mounted spotlights on the aircraft that would shine two spots onto the water. When the altitude was just right the two spots would merge (light to light to water forming a unique triangle). This was a solution that provided precision and let the pilot keep his eyes on the job.

    2. Re:The Dam Busters by Captain+Gingersnaps · · Score: 1
      I can't help but ask... Did you guys all play the old Broderbund game "Dam Busters" on the C64? I know all about the skipping barrel bombs and those way cool spotlight altimeter only because of that game.

      Anyone have other recommended reading/viewing on the subject?

    3. Re:The Dam Busters by BJH · · Score: 1


      Yeah, I played that game too, but it was a bit too fiddly for my tastes. Anyway, I remember reading a book (called, I think, "The Dambusters" - gee, that's a surprise) written by a journalist(?) who contacted many of the guys involved (including Barnes, who was responsible for the design of the bomb itself). It was pretty old; published in the late 60s, I think.

    4. Re:The Dam Busters by Morel · · Score: 1

      Also, during WWII:
      I don't know if this really happened. I read about it a looong time ago.
      Apparently, the Allies were worried that the Nazis knew the date and location of the Normandie invasion. They couldn't change their plans for a variety of reasons, so they decided to fool them: They took a corpse, dressed it up as an intelligence officer, complete with handcuffed briefcase, realistically aged love letters, IDs and pictures, as well as several real and fake documents in the briefcase. The real ones were included to fortify the illusion and the fake one gave an erroneous date and location for the invasion.
      They uh, modified, the body to simulate wounds and burns from a plane crash and dropped it in the sea where it would be picked up by Nazi patrols.
      The Germans found it, bought the story, and moved a lot of their available troops to non-threatening areas of the coast.
      Can anyone confirm or deny?

      Morel

    5. Re:The Dam Busters by deefer · · Score: 2

      The reason for attacking these areas in the Ruhr valley was critical to the subduing of the perceived threat by the Nazis. As mentioned in an Einstein post earlier, there were concerns about the Nazis having this uber weapon to bring countries to it's knees.
      The British intelligence knew that this weapon was to be atomic. To make the atomic weapons, a large supply of Deuterium ("heavy" water) was required - it slows activity of radioactive materials.
      That was why the dams were so heavily fortified, and why the British had to destroy them.
      BTW, they said that the Lancaster would never fly...

      --

      Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    6. Re:The Dam Busters by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      The allies did a lot more than that. They kept moving Patton around because Hitler was sure Patton would lead the invasion. I also saw a show on the History Channel that showed some soldiers single-handedly lifting tanks... they were inflatable decoys that the allies created! They took this decoy thing pretty serious.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  96. Alan Turing's "bomb" by um...+Lucas · · Score: 3

    You know, the device he built in WW2 that cracked enigma's encryption... Pretty much it was a mechanical computer... Built out of necessity, in a relatively short period of time. It did onething, but one thing good. That's got to be on the list somewhere, because if it weren't for that, we'd be living in a much darker world.

    1. Re:Alan Turing's "bomb" by Voytek · · Score: 1

      The "bomb" (actually bomba) was built by Polish scientists before WWII.

  97. TeX bugless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure. Just start your standard Unix TeX and baffle it with the following input: \def\x{\the\x}\x If a Microsoft program could be brought to such behaviour, you'd complain like mad and scoff.

    1. Re:TeX bugless? by pandr · · Score: 1

      So, in your opinion, gcc is buggy because it makes
      int main() { main(); }
      dump core? Hmmm...

  98. The Jeep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I believe the Jeep has got to be one of the greatest hacks ever, with one of the largest impacts.

    I don't know how many folks actually know the history of the Jeep, but the beginning is actually a pretty good story.. The first Jeep had to be designed and a working prototype built and delivered to the gov't in 49 days. And of course had to meet a gov't spec, which was next to impossible at the time.

    But, American Bantam, with the help of a talented engineer named Ken Probst succeeded in producing a prototype.

    Check out the history:
    http://www.fourwheel.com/jeephist.html
    http://www.off-road.com/~early/history.html
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/087341564 7/qid=943458780/sr=1-34/102-9399911-034726 6
    The history channel has some good specials on Jeeps too.

    The Jeep was said to be one of three advancements that helped the allies win WWII, and continued to serve in the US Military until the HUMV came along..

    There is only one (OIIIIIIIO)

  99. Printing press by LostOne · · Score: 2

    While I was reading the article, the printing press immediately jumped to mind, so I will add my vote for the printing press as the alltime greatest hack. After all, consider its longevity!

    --

    If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
  100. The Great War of the Worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " This is Orson Welles, ladies and gentlemen, out of character to assure you that The War of the Worlds has no further significance than as the holiday offering it was intended to be. The Mercury Theatre's own radio version of dressing up in a sheet and jumping out of a bush and saying Boo! Starting now, we couldn't soap all your windows and steal all your garden gates, by tomorrow night...so we did the next best thing. We annihilated the world before your very ears, and utterly destroyed the CBS. You will be relieved, I hope, to learn that we didn't mean it, and that both institutions are still open for business. So good-bye everybody, and remember, please, for the next day or so, the terrible lesson you learned tonight. That grinning, glowing, globular invader of your living room is an inhabitant of the pumpkin patch, and it your doorbell rings and nobody's there, that was no Martian...it's Halloween.

  101. Paul Allens 8080 simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one and only inovative thing that created Microsoft; Paul Allens 8080 simulator for DEC that he hacked when they had 30 days to show off Gates cut'n'paste basic-interpreter on a computer they didn't have available. Oh, and the bootstrap he hacked hacked on the plane so they could boot the same box. Two great hacks that never have been repeated later by MS. Imagine the company MS could have been if Allen had got CEO...
    Reference: History of the Microcomputer Revolution, What good is a computer without Software?

  102. SR-71 Blackbird and Wozniak by wynlyndd · · Score: 1

    If one is considering elegant and purposeful technology as "hacks", the SR-71 blackbird is impressive. Built by engineers in a rather quick amount of time without computers. Even on its retirement flight it set a cross country speed record.

    And of course, da Woz is da Man! I saw mention of his work on the floppy controller in an earlier post. I also vaguely remember a story about one of his earlier video controller designs. Not one but two great hacks! :)

    --
    "Dogs and cats, living together...it's mass hysteria!"
  103. One of the greatest hardware hacks... by klm20 · · Score: 1

    The Viking Mars Lander cameras built by Itek Optical Systems. (Their ability to do stereoscopic imaging is what helped TRW to debug their crummy robot arm.)

    --
    I gave my boss a reality check. It bounced.

  104. greatest hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the plow? Simple and elegant, it changed the way we live from hunter/gatherers to a farming society. This allowed for the growth of excess food, thereby permitting the distribution of labor and the development of modern society.

    1. Re:greatest hack... by commbat · · Score: 1

      The idea of the plow is good, but it would never have been worth much without the collar that allowed the animal to use all of it's strength to pull it.

      --
      'Intellectual Properties' are uncontrollable in the wild. To base an economy on them is just stupid.
  105. Some great hacks ... by Frater+219 · · Score: 5
    Here are a few of what I think of as great hacks, in various different fields:
    • The Macintosh. Regardless of what you think of the current MacOS, it's incredibly impressive that the computing world was transformed by a 128KB machine that fits in a backpack. Desktop publishing emerged because of the Mac and the LaserWriter; the Mac also brought networking (in the form of AppleTalk) to the small office.
    • The RFCs and the Internet standards process. A social hack: formulating and documenting protocols out in the open instead of in back rooms under NDAs. Out of this hack emerged essentially all the protocols which run the Net.
    • The organ transplant. A medical/biological hack: The ability of surgeons to patch a running system is impressive in and of itself; the ability to patch a running system out of components from another, mostly-compatible, system, is simply amazing.
    • The GPL. A legal hack: The GPL is in one sense the "Intellectual Property" equivalent of Gödel's (First) Incompleteness Theorem: it turns copyright and licensing laws back on themselves in order to create restrictions upon their power, just as Gö turns mathematical logic back on itself to demonstrate its limits.
    • For that matter, Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems themselves, for pretty obvious reasons. Mathematical hacks.
    1. Re:Some great hacks ... by Azul · · Score: 1

      Yeah, go RFCs and GPL. :)

      Alejo.

  106. The wheel.. by 0x25 · · Score: 1

    I think the greatest hack of all time would be the wheel. Since back then, they didn't have computers or math or science or much of anything else.

    --
    =
  107. Inflatable Army by Dark+Ramon · · Score: 1

    One that I haven't heard yet was the inflatable tanks thet the Allies used to fool Hitler on D-Day.

    The Germans had a LOT of respect/fear for General Patton. They were certain that if there was going to be an invasion of Europe, it would be old Blood 'n Guts who would be leading the charge. So what happened was the contacted Hollywood and had their wonderfully adept set crews make a large number of inflatable and wooden tanks. They set all of these psuedo-tanks up at the point in England that was closest to France, which would be the most likely staging ground. The German air reconnaissance, especially with the foggy weather, revealed columns upon columns of tanks in this fake launch point. Hitler decided that any such force, especially one lead by Patton, would have to be the main invasion force.

    Even when we were shipping tens of thousands of troops in through Normandy, Hitler still clung to his belief that the real invasion was coming from Patton, and that this "invasion" was just a diversion. Patton wasn't too happy about being left out of D-Day, but you really can't argue with the results...

    --
    "I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member" - Groucho Marx
  108. Atari ST MIDI-Maze by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    The amount of pure genuis that forward-thinking that went into this game was amazing. Somebody had the brilliant idea of writing a networked game using the MIDI ports that were standard on all Atari ST computers. And, unbelivably, the game he came up with was essentially multi-player DOOM: eight people running around in a 3D maze shooting each other. In 1987!

  109. All-time physics hack: Planck's constant by re-geeked · · Score: 2

    For those not familiar, Planck introduced his constant to resolve the "ultraviolet catastrophe", the fact that thermal radiation intensity drops off at high frequencies.

    Why is it a hack? Well, Planck had no conception of wave-particle duality, or quanta, or any of that stuff. He just knew his calculus, and that integration over discrete energy values, rather than a true continuum, would give the radiation curve like that observed. He just crunched the numbers to come up with the value that fit, and voila! It worked, so maybe it's right.

    When Einstein showed that he just happened to be right, it set off quantum mechanics, thus allowing us to figure out lasers, nuclear energy, and semiconductors.

    A truly righteous hack.

    --
    "You can't get something for nothing." - my grandfather, on the stock market and Reaganomics.
    1. Re:All-time physics hack: Planck's constant by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was God hacking the universe. He couldn't get it to work without inserting that kludgy constant.

  110. The Musical Floppy Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hah, that's nothing! There have been programs to play music on floppy drives, by moving the read/write head. I used to have one for my Amiga.

    booch (not logged in)

  111. Hacks that effected more people, and showed us... by Darwin2000 · · Score: 1

    Hacks that effected more people, and showed us that by design MS is to busy steal code and buying inovation from poor startups.
    Ping packets that were of Max size, send to any MS product would lock it up. Windows 3.1 timeframe and tcpip for dos.
    WinNuke: Yea its lame, but damn was it simple. Anyone remember logging into a IRC channel and having someone nuke the whole channel of 300 plus users?
    Win 95 time frame.
    Brute Force WinNT password file: Since they made it everyone readable and made Guest accounts default. BLah, this was just dumb.
    And my very favorite that by design very funny, since it was something that should have been caught in the RFC stage. SMURF attack, You ping a subnet broadcast address such as 10.10.10.255, where 255 is the broadcast that all machines respond too. With a ping of 64k size, and then forge the return address. This one was such a obvious flaw in the design of IP, that it is just sad they never caught it.

    Now these are now very scripted or obsolete, but from effect, the discoverers, of these really were doing something.
    Later

  112. Great Hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Use of high-voltage alternating current to send power over long distances without much loss. (Evade Ohm's law)

    2. Error correcting codes (same as above, but for information, not energy).

    3. Sub-carriers, particularly NTSC color TV, combatible with B+W.

    4. Covert re-programming of the U of Washington card section at the Rose Bowl by Caltech students (circa 1961).

    5. Ghost and phantom telephone circuits.

    6. Circularly polarized antennas.

  113. Aerospace Hacks... by Petethelate · · Score: 2

    * Titanium, as any metal, expands when heated: the planes had to have 'seams' in the wings
    that were closed when the sheetmetal expanded: the SR-71 leaked fuel (120 octane fuel)
    while parked on the runway!

    Actually, it was a special jet fuel, incredibly thick. A friend (who used to drive U2s back in the '50s, and has a son who drove SR71s) describes the leaks thusly: "It forms a drop, and the drop sloowwwlllyyy droops down until it breaks off. Then it starts again".

    My nominations for the aerospace hacks: Apollo 13: building a CO2 scrubber from duct tape and report covers with the atsronaut's lives at stake is the epitomy of a hack. (The mission team assembled in a room with the goodies available in the spacecraft. They had to adapt the squarish Command module scrubber cartridge to the LM's round one.)
    For aircraft, I'll nominate the U2. Take a close look at a 3-view of the U2, espcially from the top. Repeat with the F104. Yup, the fastest, orneriest fighter of its age donated its fuselage to the U2. The Skunk works really knew how to build them well, and build them cheap.

    Pete

    1. Re:Aerospace Hacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Avro Arrow! Avro Arrow!

    2. Re:Aerospace Hacks... by costas · · Score: 1

      I guess my definition of a "hack" requires innovation. I donot want to put down the flight and ground crew of Apollo 13, but they didn't really innovate. They had balls the size of a Saturn V and achieved the impossible, but that CO2 scrubber was already on the spacecraft. A great McGuyver hack, but in the Top 10? I am sure any veteran Army/Navy technician has at least one story like that...

      I do agree with you though on the F-104 and the U-2; even the F-117 could qualify --it's amazing that thing flies at all ;-)... Maybe Skunk Works should be the #1 hackers of all time.

      engineers never lie; we just approximate the truth.

    3. Re:Aerospace Hacks... by RayChuang · · Score: 2

      If we use the classical definition of "hack," the Lockheed Skunk Works wins hands down.

      Thanks to the undeniable genius of one Clarence "Kelly" Johnson, they were building airplanes and rockets that were FAR ahead of their time.

      Look at what projects Johnson was involved in--P-38 Lightning, P-80 Shooting Star, F-104 Starfighter, U-2, A-12/SR-71, among many others. What is so amazing about the U-2 and the A-12/SR-71 was the fact that both projects were done mostly by computations on a slide rule and were done only by no more than 30 engineers on the project! The way the Skunk Works improvised the U-2 design from the F-104 Starfighter bordered on absolute genius--and it was all done in less than 8 months....

      --
      Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  114. Apollo 13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would considering bring back the apollo 13 crew alive one of the greatest hacks.
    go NASA!

  115. I nominate the Avro Arrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd like to nominate the Avro Arrow. It's still remembered and pined for decades later and pushed all the boundries of the time (jets only recently surpassed it in raw performance). They not only designed a jet but a revolutionary engine to power it and a new missle control system for it at the same time. One at a time is considered hard, all three is considered crazy. They also pionered the use of titanium in airplane construction. Plus many other advances.

    Plus, many of the engineers went on to hack out the apollo stuff at NASA

    1. Re:I nominate the Avro Arrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A great plane screwed over by a crappy government. THat isn't a hack, it's a greek tragedy.

  116. Timex/Sinclair ZX-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unquestionably the greatest hack of its day and possibly all time.

    Clive's mission was to design a computer which would run BASIC, store programs to cassette tape, hook to your TV with no additional equipment, use only standard parts found in any electronics store and sell for $200 US.

    He did it.

    At the time my friends and I were building communication aids for the handicaped. Our thought was that this little computer was much cheaper than the single-board industrial controlers of the day. So if we could interface into it we could make our equipment much cheaper.

    I reverse-engineered the electronics and found that any attempt to modify the machine would destroy it. Data lines were being used to control the character generator, which was in the same ROM as the BASIC interpreter. Address lines were being used as data. One address line was, I believe, tied to the CPU interupt line so that the video frame would generate after every so many instructions.

    In short, everything was tied to everything else and nothing was being used as the chip vendor originally intended. You couldn't modify this without breaking it.

    I left that project with the required "Oh wow, that was NEAT! What was he smoking when he designed this?" feeling.

    I am not anonymous. Slashdot just keeps ignoring my account. I am:

    Bob Washburne rcwash@concentric.net

  117. Various Thoughts by zairius · · Score: 2

    I hear greatest hack... I think of the balloon popping out of the middle of the football field during the Harvard-Yale game. But then I'm biased... I went to MIT

    As far as digital pranks, my best was done to a poor computer at Walmart. I wrote a 2-byte com program that was interrupt 13 (reboots the computer under DOS). I named it win.com and dir.com. I then edited the file with the dir reference(forgot which one it was... been a long time since I mucked with DOS) so that dir would run dir.com (don't forget to make sure it is in the path!) I always would giggle thinking of some poor guy trying to run windows and then when the machine rebooted trying to run dir to see what was up.

  118. I suggest these by graybeard · · Score: 1

    1) The discovery that the Captain Crunch whistle made a 2600 Hz tone, and What That Means To Telephones.

    2) The way Sir Earnest Shackleton rescued the Endurance expedition. You gotta read the story, you won't believe it.

  119. Einsteins General Relativity. by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 2

    I think that one of the greatest hacks of all time.

    Is Einsteins General Relativity.

    Made by one man and describing
    how matter, energy, space and time interact.

    I also have a website with revolutionary technology.
    Here you can find many grate hacks.

    Knud

  120. Orsen Well's War of the Worlds radio broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was really science fiction, but lots of people missed the disclaimers and started to panic.

  121. How about Sergeant Pepper? by sydj · · Score: 0

    Sergeant Pepper in many respects could be regarded as a hack (in the Jargon file sense) , technically and musically Technically because, let's face it, many recording techniques were pioneered on that record and musically because it sounded like nothing before it. Just my tuppence worth

  122. Re:cc hack + a nomination or three. by Eric+Hillman · · Score: 2

    Try reading it again. You need to understand what "bug1" and "bug2" are.

    Bug1 is "if I am compiling 'login', add a bug which enables Ken to login with a secret password at any time, whether or not he has an account"

    Bug2 is "if I am compiling 'cc', add bug1 and bug2"

    The trick is, once you've written these two bugs into cc, you compile your new cc, delete the bugs from the source code, and compile your clean source with your *hacked* cc, which silently and secretly passes those bugs along. Now, any copy of "login" built with this compiler, or built with any compiler built by this compiler, or any of its descendents down the line, will allow Ken Thompson access to your computer, and you'll never know about it because it's not in the source any more.

    The '\v' stuff was just to introduce you to the notion of altering a compiler to extend its ability to understand and respond to patterns, and how once you've done it once longhand, future builds can use the shortcuts you've taught it.

    Speaking of strange loops, I think a definite candidate for one of the century's most beautiful hacks is Godel's Incompleteness Theorem.

    I'd also have to give nods to Einstein's Relativity theories, and the recent proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, both of which I only rank below Godel *as hacks* because they don't have the same marvelous seems-obvious-once-you've-done-it-ness of Godel's feat.

    --
    perl -e '$_="06fde129ae54c1b4c8152374c00";
    s/(.)/printf "%c",(10,32,65,67,69,72,

    --
    $_="06fde129ae54c1b4c8152374c00"; s/(.)/printf "%c",(10,32,65,67,69,72, (74..76),(78..80),(82..85))[hex $1]/eg;
  123. Two digit dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We'll save 50% of memory by only storing the last two digits of a year." "This software will be replaced long before the year 2000." "The same minds that shorten the name of this problem to 'Y2K'". $365 billion dollars, an interminable publicity campaign, glassy-eyed survivalists, and awful made-for-TV movie later, it goes on.

  124. "this website not here yet" by shawnhargreaves · · Score: 1

    I think the old transmeta website was a pretty damn cool hack. Minimalistic, elegant, and yet perfectly achieved the desired purpose of making everyone interested in them. Hacking the perceptions of their audience: how can you improve on that?

  125. Re: The Mosquito by G-Man · · Score: 3

    Actually, I thought it was built of plywood mainly because steel was a very precious commodity during the war. Either way, you're right, it was a very creative design.

    In the same vein, I nominate the Sherman "Hedgehog" Tanks of the Normandy invasion. Normandy is (or at least was) full of large hedgerows, or "Bocage". Whenever a tank rolled over one, it would expose the thin armor on its underbelly, and the Germans quickly learned to place anti-tank guns on the other side to dispatch them.

    After losing quite a few tanks, the legend goes that some Sergeant got the bright idea to cut up the steel beach obstacles (if you've seen "Saving Private Ryan", they're the ones shaped like children's jacks) and weld them to the front of the Shermans. These forks would lodge into the front of the hedgerow and the tank would bust on through going fast, straight, and level, with the much thicker front armor facing the enemy.

    So aside from the sheer ingenuity level, it has the added irony of using the German's own obstacles against them, enough to qualify as an all-time "hack" in my book.

  126. Learning Perl Camel book by tweek · · Score: 2

    That's where the intro about the beads is. I actually pulled it out when I was making my original submission just to verify the depth of the hack ;)
    "We hope you find fun and laughter in the new millenium" - Top half of fastfood gamepiece

    --
    "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  127. Who ever thought they'd get away with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Cardiff Giant

    The Crystal Palace

    Paper money

    The Cape Girardeau and Southwestern Railroad in Missouri, which was required to run its first train over its right of way by a certain date or else lose its franchise. After their track was about 1% completed, their competitor, Jay Gould, refused to sell them rails or to allow rails to be transported to them. So they ran the train to the end of the line, tore up the track behind, laid it down in front, and repeated the process until they had completed their first run on time.

  128. Turing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No doubt 100 people will nominate this, but I think most of the top 10 best hacks belong to the Brittish and American code breakers during WWII. Turing and co built the first programmable computers, one of which could read in a printout of data at 32 feet per second, and that limitation only existed because the paper broke! The Germans just couldn't manage to come up with a code that remained secure, despite the fact that that their codes were some of the toughest and most complex ever created!

    Turing's team even managed to build a functional replica of a coding machine they had never seen, just from reverse-engineering the encoded information!

    1. Re:Turing by freeBill · · Score: 1

      Turing should indeed be nominated, but for what?

      This is a guy who came up with the idea for the digital computer long before the hardware existed to actually build one. He looked at Godel's Theorem and its proof, which mapped all of arithmetic onto integers. Thus Godel (already nominated for this hack) mapped math onto itself.

      Turing realized this was useful for a problem faced by adding-machine makers. They could make a machine to solve any particular problem of arithmetic, but they couldn't make a machine which could solve a problem for which it was not designed.

      But, if a machine could be made to solve the Godel problem of turning any problem of a logical calculus into an arithmetic problem, then it could also solve that arithmetic problem. Thus he conceived of the digital computer without having any of the equipment needed to make it.

      Indeed, we still use his computability theorem today to describe the limits of the machines which he could only work with in his mind.

      --
      Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  129. The Cold War hack by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 1

    Well, there was that hack that me and my buddies did about ten years ago, which brought down the Berlin Wall, all of communist Eastern Europe, the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union.

    Uh, but I'm not really supposed to be talking about it ...

  130. There aren't any good cracks by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

    The sad state of affairs is that there aren't that many good hacks anymore. The people who break into computers nowadays tend to be too stupid to realize what a good hack would be. Creativity and the script kid tend to be an Xor situation.

    If you take a look at Attrition.org's mirror of web page defacements you'll notice that both the Senate's Teleconferencing Server( Mirror ) and Michigan Public Sexual Offender Query ( Mirror )were broken into in the past week or so. Imagine the fun that could be had with the two servers. Imagine the damage. But these geniuses (rackmount and ieet respectivly) decided the best use of access to these systems was to replace the homepages.

    I hope that there will be hacks worth hearing about, instead of what seems to be the standard defacement. I guess actually programming is too hard for these script kids.

    --

    --
    Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
  131. Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well put.

  132. PARC not a hack... by Croaker · · Score: 1

    My personal definition of a hack is more along classic lines... something done cheap and quick. IMHO, Apollo 11 and Xerox's PARC coming up wth the classic GUI do not fall into this category. Granted, Apollo 11 was done in a short amount of time (for what it actually acheieved) but consdering a measureable amount of the GNP of the US went into the feat, I don't really consider it it cheap. Ditto for the GUI design. It wasn;t done that quickly, and Xerox dumped tons of money into PARC.

    I'm not disputing that these were legendary technological achievements, but they really don't fit the category of a "hack" (in my sense, at least).

  133. Eunice by hbo · · Score: 1
    In the early 80's, as work was progressing at CSRG in Berkely on BSD on the VAX, a controversy arose regarding the performance of BSD on the VAX vs VMS on the VAX. Dave Kashtan, a VMS and networking wizard then at SRI International claimed that VMS had superior performance. To prove his point, he wrote Eunice, a BSD kernel emulation layer on VMS. The system would run many BSD 4.2 VAX binaries on VMS unmodified in many cases faster than the same binaries ran natively on BSD. Kashtan's criticisms of BSD led to performance improvements in the 4.3 kernel and beyond. There's a reference to this in the daemon book. I administered VAX systems at UCSB in the late 80s. We had Eunice on one of those systems, and I hated it. it ran dog slow and had many bugs. Dave assures me that was just the inferior commercialized version, and that the "real" Eunice was far better. I have to be careful what I say about this because I work for him now. 8) Ironically, I administer his FreeBSD systems. Nonetheless, Eunice is the first OS emulation layer I recall hearing about. Its genesis as a working demonstration of a pointed criticism of 4.2 BSD and the subsequent effect it had on BSD development qualify Eunice as a "great hack" in my book.

    Howard Owen hbo@egbok.com Everything's Gonna Be OK Consulting

    --

    "Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers

    1. Re: Eunice by copito · · Score: 2

      Eunice also merits a special mention in the Perl configuration script:

      "Congratulations. You aren't running Eunice."
      --

      --
      "L'IT c'est moi!"
  134. The Mosaic Web Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "modest" piece of software made an obscure set of Swiss software protocols into a trillion dollar international financial feeding frenzy. It made its mediocre author and sponsor billionaires. It brought down the richest man in the world and his predatory company that tried to crush it.

  135. Relativity and Archimedes by Amadawn · · Score: 1

    So what about the Relativity Theory?

    Ok, the whole thing is big and complex, but the initial idea that speed of light is constant and the existance of ether is not important must be one of the most simple yet clever ideas ever!

    Or what about the way Archimedes found out that his king's crown was not made only of gold? Now, THAT'S CLEVER!

    However I don't know it this can be considered benign, because I guess the guy that made the crown ended in prison if not something worse...


    Angel

  136. My Best Hack by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    I had written an application in the mid-80's on the PC using Turbo Pascal 8087 edition. It required a math processor to operate. One customer had an early '286 laptop, without a '287, and couldn't run the app.

    In two days I hacked together a suitable 8087 emulator... (simtel, emul87.zip).

    This was the technique... I noted that Turbo C supported '87 floating point, and could emulate if the math processor wasn't available. I noted that there was a pattern in the INT instructions used to replace the floating point instructions.

    I wrote a very simple TSR, that enabled the emulate trap, and reversed the transformation usually done, then dispatched to the Turbo C library. Total of 50 lines of code!

    It worked beautifully. I consider this my best computer programming hack. Of course it doesn't qualify as anything close to the "Top 10".

    Ratboy666 F. Weigel.

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  137. The Caltech Hack by rnturn · · Score: 1

    IMHO, the Caltech hack of the card section at the Rose Bowl was the greatest and better than the MIT football game hack. (This one's also listed in the Jargon File.)

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  138. Don't forget the A-Team! by RebornData · · Score: 2

    The bad guys always seemed to lock them up in a room handily appointed with welding / cutting torches and an abundance of materials to create anything from armored vehicles to oxygen bottle missiles.

    I love it when a .plan comes together!

  139. America Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A gaming dialup bulletin board morphed into one of the largest and richest InterNet portals. Deftly out-manuevered Bill Gates, Paul Allen, and its own internal incompetence. AOL has became a synonym for tackiness much like "plastic" or "Made in Japan".

  140. My nominations by RISCy+Business · · Score: 2

    #1 ENIAC.
    I'm sorry, but you'll find absolutely NO larger hack! (And I'm not talking just size here, either.)

    #2 Linux
    Take one part Minix, one part frustation, add hundreds of thousands of lines of code from all over the place, cobbled together, and you get Linux. Definitely a hack if there ever was.

    #3 NetBSD/OpenBSD/FreeBSD
    Not to discount the BSDs in comparison to Linux, but they're not as big a hack. They all follow a fixed set of standards, but they've got bits and pieces of code from everywhere!

    #4 Sun Microsystems
    Yes, I'm nominating a company. Take a few gurus, some people with money, build a machine, capitalize on it's popularity, remove all gurus, and still remain popular through marketing. The ultimate business hack.

    #5 Windows 98
    Bite me, folks. It's a hack plain and simple. Start with MS-DOS. Put Windows 3.0 on top. Then add Windows 3.1 code. Then add Windows 3.11 code. Then add Windows 95 code, and a few million more lines of code, and you have Windows 98!

    #6 The Internet
    Vint Cerf doesn't remember the first time they made two computers talk to eachother. It was cobbled together. To this day, it's cobbled together and held together by bailing wire and duct tape. Let's hear it for the world's biggest hack!

    #7 godhatesfags.com
    The man is the ultimate literary and legal hack. He's been banned from practicing law multiple times. Hacks don't necessarily HAVE to involve computers; computers just help to expose them. ;)

    #8 slashdot.org
    C'mon, Rob. Don't bother denying it. slashdot is a cobbled together pile of code teetering on the edge of either brilliance or total system meltdown. Embrace it! Be proud of it! :)

    #9 Mandrake Linux
    Cheap Hacks'R'Us. Take existing distribution. "Extend" existing distribution. Put in other stuff. Relabel with new flashy logo and name. Sell for same price as competitor. Speaks for itself.

    #10 WinModems
    We can emulate old PCs on our dual pII-450's, why not emulate hardware, like UARTs and DSPs? Now *THAT* is a hack if I ever did see one!

    The opinions above are mine and mine and only mine and thievery of opinions or frags will be met with fierce resistance. Thank you drive through, offer not applicable in all areas, while supplies last, no purchase necessary, call 1-800-NOT-REAL or send SASE to NO SUCH CONTEST, RT 666 BOX 1, COUDERSPORT, PA, 16915, sorry we're all out of Pokemon.

    1. Re:My nominations by JGaiser · · Score: 1

      I'm surpised it took this long for anybody to say Linux. I've been using Linux since 0.12. No hard drive, no login, just boot into a shell. It was a great hack then and it still is.

      Jerry

  141. 10 hacks? by Hawke · · Score: 1
    Just a list of things I think might be worthy.

    • Getting Apollo 13 back home.
    • SR-71 (the pointy thing in the middle of each engine extends or retracts to keep the shockwave aligned with the edge of the intake, using the shockwave as a first-stage compressor... And that's just one of many hacks involved in that plane)
    • Mars Pathfinder (already mentioned)
    • Duff's Device
    • The cooling system for the Cray-2
    • Putting a refrigerator in a computer case to allow you to overclock a chip to 1GHz
    • Beer!
    • Superglue(tm) as a suture device
    • QWERTY keyboard layout

    If we don't restrict ourselves to human-created hacks, how about the development cycle of human infants? We are born incrediably small to avoid killing the mother, and have ~18 years of physical development ahead of us.

  142. F-104 concave engine inlets by georgeha · · Score: 1

    An elegant way to bring incoming air moving at Mach 1+ down to subsonic without too much of a performance hit.

    A gently concave curve throws lots of little shockwaves into the air flow, each shockwave drops the air speed a little bit, and eventually you get subsonic flow into the engine.

    Come to think of it, the F-104 is pretty elegant, it can almost reach space, depending on your definition of space. And it was used to train astronauts for orbital maneuvers.

    George

  143. The Great Escape by Paul Brickhill by Logos · · Score: 1

    This book in my mind is the greatest example of human ingenuity and the evolution of knowledge out there. I read this book over and over as a kid.

    This book (the movie, while good doesn't do the hacking justice) truly shows how necessity is the mother of invention.

    I especially like how early in the war, both the methods of escape, AND of escape detection while often ingenious, were crude compared to the methods employed by both sides at the end.

    Just some examples (the whole book is like this):

    The prisioners started digging tunnels once going over the wire was made too difficult by the employment of efficient guard turrets and redundant fencing. The camp personnel began driving weighted wagons around the camp to collapse the tunnels. The prisoners dug deeper, the guards moved the fences further out, etc.

    AND

    The German Camp administrators, in an effort to stop prisoners from tunneling out from within the barracks, put the barracks' on stilts.

    The prisioners, to get around this began tunnels from the only parts that weren't lifted onto stilts--namely the shower room, and the stove foundation.

    Also fascinating was their security (both sides); the prisoner's adaptation of military uniforms to civilian clothes; the use of sound detection equipment by the Germans to listen for digging; and the forgery of documents--by hand and in poor light that were in some cases more realistic than the examples! A good example of relative ethics--forgery here was a good thing(to the prisoners anyway ;) )

    I have cited this book on several occasions as an example of why there is no such thing as a perfect system, and how we shouldn't concentrate on who's to blame when security is breached, but instead focus on the inevitable evolution. Also pointless in my mind, is to think that a perfect solution to any problem can ever be found, but that the seeking of the solution is what is paramount.

    This book gets my vote.

    --
    We are agents of the free
  144. Real hacks require GENIUS by RayChuang · · Score: 1

    Folks,

    If you're talking a "hack" in the classic definition, the ones done at MIT and CalTech make computer hacking seem like a minor incident in comparison. (^_^)

    The ones done at MIT--namely the "R2-D2" modification to a building, the famous "VU Meter" during a Boston Pops concert, and the weather balloon with "MIT" emblazoned on it that popped up in the middle of the field during a Harvard-Yale game--require a LOT of ingenuity and planning to pull it off. The same applies for the legendary hacks at CalTech: the placard modification on a cheering section that when displayed read "CalTech" or the sudden modification of the electronic sign board at the Rose Bowl some years ago.

    I still think the great college "hack" of all time was that placard display in the cheering section during the football game that when displayed read CALTECH. This is an incredible feat of genius, especially since the hack was done well before the days when there was easy access to computers and someone managed to quietly change the cheering section placard display without everyone ELSE knowing about it.

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
    1. Re:Real hacks require GENIUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only people who CARE about that crap is other MIT graduates who somehow think MIT means anything anymore. Sorry, bub, but that school has been out of it for the last 10 years or so...

  145. Ten Commandments too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politician pay lip service to them, but break half of them.

  146. Voyager 1 & 2 by AndroSyn · · Score: 1

    Using ancient hardware and software from the late 60's and early 70's these two space probes have been sailing through space and relaying back data at somewhere around 1.4kb/s. Perhaps one of the most fault tolerant computer systems that man has ever created. And reprogrammable at that.

  147. Hacking is Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Ken Thompson created the cc hack today, he'd be fired, sued and probably prosecuted by the government. The computer industry has changed, and not all for the better. You stupid fucks.

  148. The GNU General Public Licence by jalet · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why noone seems to have mentionned RMS designing the GNU GPL as the greatest hack of all times:
    * longevity
    * social and/or technological impact
    * elegance
    * that not-easily definable quality of "I shoulda thought of that!"

    --
    Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
  149. Nominations for Scientists by Tony+Hammitt · · Score: 1

    First off, I have to nominate Kepler's elliptical planetary orbits. Everyone in the history of the world had been using some variation of circles and he comes up with ellipses. Truly a hack.

    Someone already mentioned Archimedes. I second them.

    Then there's Newton, previously nominated for the catflap, but I think Calculus is pretty important, too. Not to forget gravity or inertia either. They seem pretty obvious now.

    And anyone who has worked through the derivation of the special thoery of relativity comes away with an appreciation of a truly monumental hack.

    And finally an actual computer hack: Seymour Cray punched in the bootstrap loader for an early computer by hand, from memory, and got it right the first time. Wow.

  150. Hubble Space Telescope by melchoir · · Score: 1

    The HST should definately be considered one of the greatest hacks of all time! NASA launches an expensive telescope and didn't grind the lens correct so what do they do? They build a contact lens for it. Whoever thought of that idea is a genius. What simplicity!! And the satellite has been beaming back beautiful pictures ever since... well.... until it's gyroscopes failed. But no one is perfect.

  151. Apple ][ Chug-a-Chug-a by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    Anyone remember that old Apple ][ program (came on a Beagle Bros disk), that would:

    Alternatively start and stop the 2 floppy disk drives, eventually decreasing the time before switching to the other drive.

    It sounded exactly like Chuga----Chuga----Chuga---Chuga---Chuga--Chuga--Ch uga--Chuga-Chuga-Chuga.

    The only thing it missed was the train whistle ;-)

    One of the funniest (and most useless) hacks around.

    Cheers

  152. The very first troyan horse... by Amadawn · · Score: 2
    You know... the one Ulises made to beat the Trojans...

    That must be THE GREATEST HACK EVER, according to the article, because:

    • longevity: Everybody knows about it several thousand years later!
    • social and/or technological impact: Software troyan horses, anyone?
    • elegance: This is elegant as hell!
    • that not-easily definable quality of "I shoulda thought of that: Yeah, that's what the troyans must have thought the day after! :-)

    Angel

  153. Number 1 hack of all time: Twinkie by joshkerr · · Score: 2
    The Twinkie is easily the number 1 hack of all time.



    You try taking:



    enriched flour (niacin, iron (ferrous sulfate), thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin), water, sugar, corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup, partially hydrogenated vegetable and/or animal shortening (contains one or more of: canola oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil, beef fat), eggs, and dextrose, and also containing no more than 2% of modified food starch, whey, leavenings (sodium acid pyrophosphate, baking soda, monocalcium phosphate), salt, starch, yellow corn flour, corn syrup solids, mono and diglycerides, dextrin, calcium caseinate, sodium stearoyl lactylate, cellulose gum, polysorbate 60, wheat gluten, lecithin, flavors (artificial, natural), artifical colors (yellow 5, red 40), caramel color, preservatives (sorbic acid)


    and come up with something better. Can't be done.



    Twinkies also stand up to the tests of science. Check out this site for more information on that: Twinkies Project.

  154. Ronald Reagan for president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I heard this in 1976, it evoked the same feeling as Donald Trump, Warren Beatty, or Jesse Ventura becoming president. All has-been celebrities of eccentric political idealogies.

  155. War of the Worlds by Lust · · Score: 1

    The original "War of the Worlds" radio broadcast that created chaos as listeners thought the earth was under invasion. From an era when radio information was gospel, this changed broadcast regulations forever.

  156. Cornell University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ezra Cornell founds a university out in the middle of nowhere, at a place with the worst weather in the Northeast, and convinces students to go there.

    Now, that's a hack!

  157. Can hacks just happen? by drox · · Score: 2

    ...Or does a hack imply a hacker?

    As neat as the amino acid thing was (I'd include the wonderful replication ability of the ribonucleic acids in with that one), it seems that it just sorta...happened. A unique combination of the right energies with the right raw materials, thrown together by random chance. A hack without a hacker.

    Unless you're of the religious persuasion, in which case the Creator(s) would be the ultimate hacker(s).

    1. Re:Can hacks just happen? by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      And that's the problem with this too-wide definition of a hack that we're working with here. If you accept al lof the suggestions that have been made as being representative then "hack" is hardly any different than "do" or "make".

      So judging by the current definition, the greatest "hack" ever surely has to be... the Universe itself.

      As Londo Mollari would say: Grrreat Maker!

      Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
      Thought exists only as an abstraction

  158. Robin Hood and Friar Tuck by Monica · · Score: 1

    I'd say Robin Hood and Friar Tuck is the best hack.

    I also support Stonehenge, everything MIT, and the turning of the Rice statue.

  159. Smalltalk 72 by Jecel+Assumpcao+Jr · · Score: 1

    I think that Dan Ingall's Smalltalk-72 implementation, first for the Nova and then for the Alto, is certainly one of the top hacks of all time.

    You can try a Smalltalk 72 emulator that runs in Squeak Smalltalk. But remember that this is a hack, so don't expect it to be either easy to run or to understand.

    --Jecel

  160. I Love Lucy TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TV shows are "software", huh? Launched five decades of mediocre programming and endless repeats.

  161. It didn't fool almost everyone by hawk · · Score: 2

    I was there. I read the post. *most* of us recognized it as clever, and immediately began speculation about how it was done.

    However, a good number taken in, and they were hysterical. Remember, this was during the end-game of the cold war (though most of us still thought it was the height of the coldwar). The gullible folks (was it Stalin or Lenin that called them "useful idiots") that bought it hook, line, and sinker, decried it has a horrible thing, as it had been a great step forward for peace.

    This was also during the time that you could read the *entire* newsfeed in under two hours--all 30 or 40 groups.

    1. Re:It didn't fool almost everyone by billstewart · · Score: 1

      I was quite surprised by the reactions of people around the net. The Kremvax post was a nicely written spoof, with creatively forged headers. It was posted on April Fool's Day, and mail and news header forgery were well-known simple techniques in those days, and and there wasn't anything blazingly deep about it. It was just a good classic April Fool's post.


      But some people got all paranoid about how there were Commies On The Net After Our Precious Bodily Fluids, and more people got all bent out of shape because *Forgery* meant *you couldn't believe everything you read on Usenet!*. Oh, Nooooo!


      Two of the lasting effects of the post involved machine names. The first Usenet site in Moscow, a few years later, *was* named kremvax. And kgbvax became the canonical example of where crackers might email files they stole from your machines.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  162. Re:The M16 rifle, uh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about your M16, but every one I used (mostly M16A2) would jam and hang up if it was anything but pristine
    There are many other weapons that aren't as flakey

  163. X-Obi by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1
    Here's my hack:
    • Rig up two hobby servo motors so they control rotation and elevation of a Phantom Menace Obi-Wan toy wielding a light saber.
    • Control them with a RS-232 servo motor controller.
    • Modify xeyes so that it spits out (on stdout) the byte sequences necessary to control the servos.
    • Use stty to set the baud rate on the correct /dev/ttyS*, and redirect xeyes >/dev/ttyS*.
    So now, Obi-Wan points to the cursor on my screen. I don't run it all the time because I didn't bother to hook up a power supply, and besides sucking batteries, it's very distracting to have a Jedi Knight brandishing a light saber at my screen.
    -russ
    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  164. Charles Babbage, mechanical computer - 1800's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first computer (the "difference engine") created in the days before electronic circuts... So mechanically sophisticated, it required engineering capabilities that were not available in his time. It had to be built after his death. Need I say more.

    1. Re:Charles Babbage, mechanical computer - 1800's by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      Actually, I must correct this:

      1. The Difference Engine (1832) was not a computer, in the modern sense of the word - it was not programmable, and did not have any memory for storing data. It was, however, a splendid device designed to perform the calculations of what are called difference tables - tables of values (in a set order) used in polynomial equation solving (I have seen an explanation on what the "method of differences" are and how they relate to polynomial equations/speed up of solutions, but I can't remember now). These tables were used for a lot of things - prime being that of navigation - into which errors crept, causing ships to be lost on rocks due to navigational errors (I believe in star positional charts)...

      2. The Analytical Engine (1834-1835), however, was programmable, and even had crude branching capability (though I don't think it had looping capability). It had memory registers (the store), and a calculation portion (the mill). Input was via punched cards (after seeing Jaquard's mechanical loom), output was via a special printer. First proposed programming was done by Ada Byron (Lady Lovelace), Lord Byron's daughter, and Babbage's friend. From what is known, she understood the implications and uses of such a machine as well or better than the inventor himself, going so far as to imagine composing music and creating drawings with such a machine. What is now regarded as the first computer program, was in fact a plan to compute Bernoulli numbers using the Analytical Engine! Female coders, be proud!

      3. The machines were mechanically sophisticated, but hardly outside the engineering capabilities at the time. Accuracy of the elements of such a machine was paramount, but could be achieved with the tools of the time to the tolerances required. What really killed the project was the "switchover" from building the Difference Engine to the design and thought on the Analytical Engine - Babbage was one of those tragic figures in history who always gets 50-80% complete of a project, and then moves on - alienating those working on the project, as well as those contributing monetarily to the project. Thus, not only did he lose workers, but his funding ran out because those that were supplying it (parliment?) thought they were putting money into a sinking (and hence, unprofitable) ship...

      Links to more info:

      http://www.museums.reading.ac.uk/vmoc/babbage/

      http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/love.htm

      http://zeus.fh-brandenburg.de/~tenbusch/history/ 5.html

      http://www.nmsi.ac.uk/on-line/treasure/objects/1 862-89.html

      http://www.maxmon.com/1822ad.htm

      http://www.maxmon.com/1830ad.htm

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  165. brute force doesn't count ... by taniwha · · Score: 1

    trying all the combinations 'till something works is not a hack .... just like distributed.net's trying all the RC5 keys is not a hack ..... (now on the other hand organizing all those people to run their distributed crack engine is a wonderfull hack)

  166. Reading weird.. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Don't feel bad, I actually tend to read articles bottom to top usually skipping back and forth. I have no idea why. I do it on anything technical or that is news coverage but not with stories. I guess I'm impatient or something. I hate when text has links in it as I end up reading the linked page at the exact same time I'm reading the original and end up with about 20 Netscape windows open at once. Lots of eye candy mixed into text also annoys me as it grabs my attention as I'm skimming back and forth through text. If anyone ever looks at my web pages they usually appear sort of dull but the text is always formatted to be read and understood quickly. Much more quickly than my Slashdot messages no doubt. I actually use decent grammar on web pages. ;>

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  167. Skunk works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of how the developed the SR-71 blackbird spy plane. Most amazing engineering thing I've ever heard of.

  168. Nuclear reactors by B!! · · Score: 1

    The ultimate hack. When will the solution fall apart into chaos?

  169. Ethical Hacking by hey! · · Score: 5

    Having spent a few years at MIT, I'd like to put in a word for the ethical requirement.

    A great hack should be a thing of wonder and beauty, something only somebody with the moral equivalent of a tin ear could fail to appreciate. It needs to be perfect in every way -- no detail is so small that it can be overlooked, down to the donuts and styrofoam cups in the police cruiser. Contemplating a great hack makes you feel happy to be alive and sentient. True hacks are profoundly pro-social acts, a way to use your gifts to make the world a better place.

    Pranks that damage, deface or defame cannot rise to that standard of excellence. They're the moral equivalent of physical bullying -- ugly, and funny only to the hopelessly dull or morbidly insecure.

    Every smart kid needs to go to a place where being smart doesn't define him (like MIT or CalTech or others). Such places (and I'm sure many others) drive home the truth of what the Wizard of Oz tells the Scarecrow, "Anyone can have a brain -- that's a very mediocre commodity." Hacking isn't about asserting you're intellectual superiority, it's about combining originality and hard work.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  170. Actually that's not from a list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a txt document called "Real Programmers don't write pascal", it contains a quote like so:

    Allegedly, a Real Programmer managed to tuck a pattern-matching program into a few hundred bytes of unused memory in the Voyager spacecraft that searched for, located, and photographed a new moon of Jupiter.

    check out the whole file here, it's pretty funny otherwise too...

  171. icmp filesystem by matman · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine made a file system out of ICMP packets - put data in ping packets and bounced it out, using lag as a storage medium. hehe. was neat. he could store a few k out there.

    1. Re:icmp filesystem by Effugas · · Score: 2

      Re: ICMP File System:

      I WANT TO SPEAK TO YOUR FRIEND.

      This sounds like an utterly awesome toy to play with. I'd email you, but your address isn't listed.

      Contact me.

      Yours Truly,

      Dan Kaminsky
      DoxPara Research
      http://www.doxpara.com

    2. Re:icmp filesystem by FrankBlues · · Score: 1

      And we want source!!!

    3. Re:icmp filesystem by matman · · Score: 1

      well... this was a long time ago... he no longer has the source, nor the time to rewrite it. I suggest someone takes the idea and uses it for something :)

      what kinda uses are you thinking of for such a thing? remember that ICMP packets wont necessarily be returned so this would be sort of an unreliable file system, maybe best used if you expect another computer to want some files, so u can start pinging their puter with pings of the data and they can start collecting it when they want it? i duno :)

  172. Number one: Thompson's Compiler Hack. by seebs · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, it *was* a security hack - however, it was the one, true, neat security hack.

    Thompson changed the world for the five percent or so of people who can understand why his accomplishment is scary.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  173. I like the story of the RobinHood/Friar Tuck hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    processes named RobinHood/Friar Tuck would restart each other when one was killed -- I guess it was really hard to get rid of them -- anyone know the full story?

  174. 700 BCE: The Bible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some obscure temple clerics in an equally obscure middle eastern city (which is almost never mentioned in the records of its more famous neighbors) wrote down the legends and traditions of its culture to stop the recurring back sliding into the idolatry of its neighbors. These were the Jewish Deuterometrists. Several more chapters were added to first five, plus two millennia of endless Talmudic commentary. Led to two sequels- the New Testament and Koran- three major world religions, endless inter- and intra- religious warfare, the fundamentalistic mental-shackling of half the worlds population in three relgions for 2700 years.

    1. Re:700 BCE: The Bible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its interesting that we both posted religion based comments at the same time. I posted the thread about Jesus/died/resurection and the following 2000 years. I like yours it goes to the root of most modern religions. of course neither will make top ten . . . way to dangerous a subject.

      Yep, Anonymous again. I like my skin.

  175. Attempt at humour... by ??? · · Score: 1

    I see... The attempt at humour was made painfully obvious by the statement - "The hackers wrote of their own "rooting" exploits (that is, hacking the root directory of a server)"

  176. Nature's hacks by Shimmer · · Score: 1

    The actual top three hacks of all time are probably:

    1. The Big Bang. As Martin Gardner says, the fact that there's something rather than nothing is truly the ultimate hack.
    2. Life -- its origination from non-life and its subsequent evolution via natural selection. (Bonus points to nature for using materials that are only produced via supernovae.)
    3. Intelligence -- sentience, consciousness, call it what you will.

    One amazing thing about all these hacks is that they reflect intricate design, but no designer. Man's achievements still pale by comparison. Think about it.

    --Brian

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  177. Voyger by AdamT · · Score: 1

    For my money the voyger probes have got to be one the all time great hacks. Not so much the probes themselves (although they've long since proved themselves to be hacks in their own right) but the trajectories. If we launch at -this- time we can go here, here, here, and here, and then fling ourselves out into deep space with a tiny little probe. That's the quintessential elegent hack to me.

    --
    ... with eskimo chains i tatto my brain all the way...
  178. Clifford Stoll by Tony · · Score: 1

    Definitely. In the world of computing, there are very few hacks as well-done as this, at least as he reports it in the book.

    I believe Mr. Stoll deserves a place in the computer top-ten list.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  179. DVD Encription Hack by geekguy · · Score: 1

    One of the best hacks was when DVD encryption was cracked. Anything that allows me to watch The Matrix on my Linux machine is worthy of being known as a good hack. Or maby this is more of a crack??

    --
    -- Any comments seen here are not mine, but a mixture of alchohol and lack of sleep.
  180. Do Games qualify ? by maroberts · · Score: 1

    If that is the case then I'd like suggest the following have merit and deserve consideration...
    some of the games chosen qualify under the longevity clause and I could argue that they have played a major part in the development of computing. Some of them were great hacks, as they stretch what computers could do at the time to the limit and beyond.

    Even Microsoft gets a look in here!

    * Pong

    * Space War

    * Asteriods (Atari)

    * Space Invaders (Atari)
    The sound of marching Invaders will linger on in my memory forever.

    * Trek
    Launch Photon Torpedoes!

    * Star Raiders (Atari) or Elite (BBC/PC)
    Great Space War/Space Trading games

    * PacMan

    * Zork Text Adventures

    * Minesweeper & Patience (Microsoft)
    How many productive hours have been consumed by these programs ?

    * MS Flight Simulator
    Continously wins most realistic flight sim

    * Falcon (Spectrum Holobyte)
    Still the combat flight sim of choice.

    * Wolfenstein 3D

    * Doom

    * Quake
    Do I really need to justify the last three?

    Runners Up
    ==========
    I was also tempted by
    * Civilisation as the protypical God game.
    * Wing Commander as the definitive games with lots of bucks and FMV. The early cartoon ones were good fun too.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  181. Lizzy gets all 10 by Mr_Plow · · Score: 2

    I think Lizzy Borden should get all of the top ten slots for her hacks. They are among the most infamous hacks of all time.
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------

  182. consider religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story of Jesus . . . son of god/died/resurrection.

    Compare this to other prophets in world religions and the significance of that event over the last 2000 years.

    Does this fit the definition of "hack"?

    I'm not a Christian, just a farm boy, so please don't flame me.

    Yes, I have every intention of being Anonymous with this post. I may be a farm boy but I am not stupid about human behavior.

  183. Subversive hacks by TimToady · · Score: 1

    I think the thing that makes Perl a great hack is that it's not just a computer hack or a language hack, but also a subversive cultural hack. It turned Unix philosophy inside out and made it portable to other platforms. There was an article about the subversive history in Perl in a recent ish of Linux Magazine, but it doesn't seem to be online yet.

  184. It's in the New Hacker's Dictionary by jim · · Score: 1

    the third story on this page, to be precise. The page also details the MIT football-game hack described above.

    --
    -- Arm yourself when the Frog God smiles.
  185. The first NYC subway. by DdJ · · Score: 1

    Check out the history of the first subway system in NYC.

    The folks who built it wanted to build a subway. But, they couldn't get permission. So, they instead got permission to build a pneumatic tube network (commonly used to exchange documents and such).

    Once they'd gotten it, they slowly made it wider and bigger until it could carry subway cars. Then they sprung a pneumatic subway on the city, and the folks who denied permission for the original subway couldn't really do anything but sit there sputtering.

    That was a *great* hack, technologically and of the legal system!

    (I got the info from a documentary on the History channel, btw.)

    1. Re:The first NYC subway. by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      More info:

      Go into any older Subway sandwich places, with the "old" style subway wallpaper, and you can see pictures of this thing - alongside pictures of the rail based subway. No mention is made of the pneumatic system - it is presented on this wallpaper as being the same as the rail system. No mention is made of the developer, either. It didn't run for very far, and was soon bricked up. When the rail subway was later built, several decades later, they broke through and found one of the stations of this subway - complete with a grand piano, in pristine condition!

      BTW - the pictures on the Subway wallpaper are the ones that show the tube shaped device in the loading station, and the one of a cross-section of tube and the car, showing the interior of the car with a gentleman sitting, and I think a conductor. The picture of the "developer" they show, is actually the developer of the rail subway, not the secret pneumatic one.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  186. The wheel and axle by spell_caster · · Score: 1

    One of the oldest (classic) hacks. Still used today. Who hasn't thought "anyone could have thought of that"!

    1. Re:The wheel and axle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone caught on. The Indians of western South America never used it productively, except on kids toys.

  187. I nominate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best hack: NT (they converted VMS into this crap) Worst hack: x86 Archecture. If you knew anything about uP design, you would understand.

  188. Atlas might end as great hack by Aloril · · Score: 1
    It might in vague sense become 'www/perl' of protocols.

    Disclaimer: I'm main author of it and there are lots of things to do. Only time will tell if my intuition is right here.

    Current status of Atlas

  189. Not programming, social engineering by TrentC · · Score: 1

    Linus, on of the top 10 hackers of all time? I'm sure my emailbox is going to get crammed for saying this, but Linux is only Unix, which was already invented, cheapened with free source.

    Yes, it's a great OS. Yeah, it's pretty cool that it made source code widely available to people. But he didn't really create anything... Even the development model was already established before he did what he did.

    Okay, so he may not be a great hacker in a programming sense, but I think he's nailed it in the social engineering sense.

    Sure, OSS software development and Unix may have existed before the Linux kernel, but Linus -- unintentionally or not -- brought the two together in such a way that its effect on modern computing has yet to be calculated. How many people will end up running Linux on their desktops in the next 5 years? 10? How many servers will be chugging away, either on Linux or one of the *BSDs?

    As the article said, "Man! I wish I'd thought of that..."

    Jay (=

    1. Re:Not programming, social engineering by um...+Lucas · · Score: 3

      Well then, hey, why don't we put Bill Gates on the list of greatest hackers? :)

      I mean, he hasn't ever invented anything, just integrated and re-sold other peoples work. That in my mind, is not a hacker, sorry... Bill Gates is a great businessman (his ethics may be a little or a lot off, but he's got the worlds most valuable company).

      I would probably put Linus more in that category than in the "hacker" category. If in 5 or 10 years, all of the predictions he's made and every other Linux advocate has made come true, then wow! he did something amazing. But I think we're way too much in the early stages of this phenomenon to gauge it's long term-effects.

    2. Re:Not programming, social engineering by TrentC · · Score: 1

      Well then, hey, why don't we put Bill Gates on the list of greatest hackers? :)

      Actually, I suggested Microsoft for social engineering in another reply.

      Jay (=

    3. Re:Not programming, social engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Gates write the first EULA. Now that's a hack.

  190. one of the greatest hacks of all time by split+horizon · · Score: 1

    IMHO, one of the greatest hacks of all time is the breaking of the German Enigma cipher by Alan Turing and a group of other British scientists. Not only was this an amazing display of reverse engineering, but it is one hack that is above ethical reproach. _sh

  191. Religion by spell_caster · · Score: 1

    IMHO the best (MIT) hack ever. Some people still don't get the joke!

    P.S. If you want to send me hate mail, you're one that doesn't get the joke.

  192. The Under-Pant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    functional, in many different forms, extremely useful (for catching thse nasty skid marks), and yet who invented it?? It was one of the first open source projects!!

  193. MIT's Cathedral 7 hack. by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    This in itself is the best thing students have done, in the guide of the Church of the Lady of the All Night Tool, overnight transforming MIT's Lobby 7 into a cathedral. The hack was so good that a handbinding marrage cerimony was performed in it.



    ---
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com." The purpose of that site was not known. -- MSNBC 10-26-1999 on MS crack

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  194. Hmm... top ten hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Unix. No question. Ken Thompson writing an OS to play games on a PDP-7 that turns out to be (one of) the best available is pretty cool. I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet. 2. The internal combustion engine. 3. The telephone. (Come on, where would we be without electronic data transfer?) 4. Sputnik. 5. The allies cracking Enigma. (Maybe I've just been reading too much _Cryptonomicon_ of late.) 6. EMACS. Or vi. Take your pick. Visual editors are cool. 7. Deductive formal logic. Doing proofs is sort of like writing assembly code, but without alignment bugs and clobbering the stack. 8. Inductive proofs, because the mechanism is not at all obvious, but makes so much sense once you've learned it. 9. TCP/IP 10. Netrek.

  195. Hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought of a hack as a quick and dirty way to get something done either due to time constraints or lack of skill. A hack is duct taping two pieces together when they should have been drilled and pop riveted.
    Therefore the most succesful hack of all time is MS-DOS followed by MS Windows.

    I just can't bring myself to think of something carefully designed and brilliantly executed, like putting man on the moon, as a hack.

    When I played hockey we would refer to someone who would make up for a lack of skill by aggressive play (read: slashing and chopping with his stick) as a hack.

    Air bags in cars are another hack for people who won't buckle up.

  196. War of the Worlds by eiPi · · Score: 1

    My personal favourite ever is Orson Welles (sp?) rendition of HG Wells' War of the worlds. --If you have nothing to say, say nothing... ...I'll just shut up shall I--

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity- I enjoy it immensly!
  197. The Colossus Machine by The_Locust · · Score: 1

    The Colossu s machine (used to break the German's "FISH" code during World War II is (in my opinion) one of the greatest hacks. The complexity of the project and the speed at which they brought it to light is admirable, and quite amazing to boot. All designed by a postmaster, too. Who knew?

  198. One of my all time favorite hacks by voudras · · Score: 1

    I believe it was Orson Well's radio story about martians invading the planet. This threw a good portion of the population into panic. This was much before my time. But I've always thought it was a 'once only' hack - being that this would now be impossible.

  199. Of course I don't take C|Net very seriously... by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

    ...just as I take anything on ZDnet with a grain of salt. Those of us that are, shall we say, more technically inclined/informed know what is supposed to be "interesting and a little funny."

    The problem is when the less-informed public reads these articles. They don't know any better. I'm not saying they are stupid, just ignorant. Most likely, when John Q. Average reads these sort of "humorous" articles, he will think them to be serious-minded and well-researched. And that is most definitely not the case.

    paranoid.android

  200. AOL4FREE et. al. by SethJohnson · · Score: 1
    Here's my off-the-top-of-my-head list of hacks:

    AOL4FREE- Some college student up north used his Mac to monitor the tokens sent back and forth between the AOL server and the proprietary client app. He was able to discern the tokens sent to the server that told the server not to charge the client account because the user was in a 'free' area such as a tech support forum. By patching the client app so it always sent these tokens, the user could be chatting with 45 year old men posing as 15 year old female bisexuals for free. Hence, AOL4FREE.

    PSX Modchip- By soldering one of these chips to the logic board of a PlayStation, it is possible to defeat the copy protection scheme of the PlayStation. At boot, the hardware checks for specific corruption within the disc (consumer disc recorders will not write discs with corrupted data) and country codes. This chip tells the hardware, "Yeah, it's all corrupted. Let's get to the game." No idea who invented this.

    Capturing video images from cat's brains- This was reported a month ago or so. By decoding the electrical signals sent within a certain region of the cats brain, a video image may be derived that looks astonishingly similar to what the cat is viewing.

    Woz's programmable infrared device- This device could learn any infrared signal and then project it on demand. This was used by Woz and others to capture the infrared signal sent from emergency vehicles to stop light sensors that would change the traffic light to green. Once the signal was captured with this device, changing traffic lights to green was as simple as switching to Barney Miller when Quincy was in a commercial break.

    Canadian Cell Phone calls on Shoutcast- Those kids up in Canada tiptoed through regulations by simply connecting a frequency scanner to a computer running software that relayed the analog cell phone calls into a digital signal broadcast around the world via the internet. In America, it's illegal to monitor cell phone calls with a scanner. It's not, however, illegal to listen to calls via the internet. In Canada, it's illegal to monitor cell phone calls if the intent is malice. Since these kids were simply acting as a relay for the signals, no malice could be proven and so far as I can tell, they're still doing it to this day.


  201. Good Times by daves · · Score: 1

    The Good Times "social virus" is one of the best examples of an effective, low effort hacks.

    --
    People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
  202. Some hacks (perhaps minor, but clever) by hanway · · Score: 3
    I'll stick to computer-related hacks, otherwise the list is too broad. (How could a trojan horse program compete with The Trojan Horse?) Bearing that in mind, here are a few hacks that may be relatively minor but impressed me nonetheless:

    • The program that played music (usually Daisy) via RFI picked up by a nearby AM radio. I first encountered an 8080 version of it, but it may go back further than that.

    • The ZIL (or whatever it was called) engine that ran Zork and all the other Infocom games on every platform known to man in the early-mid 80's was a nice hack. Plus, it inspired some minor hacks in the form of some track loaders we used so that we could buy the game in one format (usually something oddball like Tandy 2000) and transfer the game data to another format.

    • Emulators are interesting in that it's impressive that they work at all, and amazing when they work well. I'd give the most credit to Magic Sac, which was, I think, the first "hostile port" of the MacOS to another platform (Atari ST); to UAE for doing the "impossible" by emulating the Amiga; and to MAME for the sheer scope of it.

    • PARNET was a "network" for Amigas that ran over the parallel port and actually worked well enough to be useful.

    • The Amiga hardware included a number of clever hacks and inspired still more: Hold-And-Modify mode graphics; copper-list-dependent graphics modes (SHAM etc.); overscanned desktops; parallel floppy duplicators (that actually "broadcast" the data to more than one drive at once); scan doublers/flicker fixers; the A2024 monitor; lack of cut-and-paste worked around by OCR'ing the frame buffer...
    One thread that runs through most if not all of these hacks is that they make a computer work in some way that was never intended by the original designers. That, to me, is a key ingredient that distinguishes a hack from a non-hack.
    1. Re:Some hacks (perhaps minor, but clever) by e.smith · · Score: 1
      One thread that runs through most if not all of these hacks is that they make a computer work in some way that was never intended by the original designers. That, to me, is a key ingredient that distinguishes a hack from a non-hack.

      In this spirit, how about "proxy ARP," which I have certainly heard called "the ARP hack." Imagine a scenario where machines A and B are on an Ethernet wire (a broadcast medium). B has a second interface and machine C is located there. A can't directly address C on the Ethernet; B must act as gateway.

      In the old days before subnet masks and all, situations arose where machine A thought it should be able to address C (e.g., because C's IP address is in a range that A believes it can see). So when A wished to communicate with C, A would issue an ARP (a broadcast packet essentially asking all computers that hear it "Whose IP is this? If it's yours, return your hardware Ethernet address.") But C would never see the broadcast packet and would never reply to the ARP, so connectivity would fail.

      The "ARP hack" solves this problem. Machine B answers the ARP request for C giving its own (B's) Ethernet address. A then happily sends packets intended for C to that address -- they arrive at B, who reads the IP address and happily forwards them (out the other interface) to C. The neat thing is that nothing special needed to be programmed in machines A or C at all, and nothing in B except for the special module that knew to answer ARPS for machines on the second interface. The IP forwarding machinery was all there anyway.

  203. quit whining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the definition of a word is whatever most people SAY IT IS! lots of words have changed their definitions over the years. the words 'geek' and 'nerd' are good examples. so what if the word 'hack' changes its meaning?

  204. A different "patch" by V.+Mole · · Score: 1
    From the patch entry in the jargon file:

    There is a classic story of a tiger team penetrating a secure military computer that illustrates the danger inherent in binary patches (or, indeed, any patches that you can't -- or don't -- inspect and examine before installing). They couldn't find any trap doors or any way to penetrate security of IBM's OS, so they made a site visit to an IBM office (remember, these were official military types who were purportedly on official business), swiped some IBM stationery, and created a fake patch. The patch was actually the trapdoor they needed. The patch was distributed at about the right time for an IBM patch, had official stationery and all accompanying documentation, and was dutifully installed. The installation manager very shortly thereafter learned something about proper procedures.

  205. "Let's use GPS noise to study plate tectonics!" by King+Babar · · Score: 5

    Yes, this is slighly off-topic, but Slashdot won't let me start a new main thread, and this is a space-related hack.

    Once upon the time, the military decided it would be really great to know exactly where you were anywhere in the world, say by just pressing a button on a hand-held unit. The geeks in the backroom found out a way to do this, using satellites (this alone was quite a hack, actually...) Now, lo and behold, we can all use GPS to find out exactly where we are.

    Well, not exactly. The military realized it would not be a great idea to let just anybody have such nice positioning information. It would suck if Saddam Hussein knew exactly where all his tanks were during a battle, too. So the GPS system also has a built-in method to screw up the signal to a greater or lesser extent depending on who you are and whether or not we're fighting a war.

    Now comes the real hack: a bunch of geeky geoscientists (or is that redundant?) decided that they could track tectonic plate movements using GPS...if only they could obtain more accuracy than the generals would be comfortable with. So what they did was design a method that all but ignored the "for the public" tracking information you could get from the GPS system, and instead focused on analyzing the inevitable phase distortions of the carrier frequency itself to achieve better than 1 cm location accuracy, after lots of post-processing. A crude analogy here would be to come up with a system that would do something useful with TCP/IP packets by ignoring the "useful" contents of the packets themselves, but concentrating on the quirky bits (like the TCP finger-printing people) or the weird statistics of packet arrival times.

    None of this is exactly what the military had in mind, but this is (so far) only useful for surveying applications, an most notably the study and identification of known and unknown faults in tectoncially active regions of the world. You can look at some of the more recent data at this JPL site put together by Michael Heflin. The next time somebody asks you how we know that plate tectonics really works, just send them here. :-)

    --

    Babar

  206. Drain trap. by camelrider · · Score: 1

    How 'bout the water trap in drainpipes. It has made indoor plumbing practical by blocking gasses, odors and microbes from escaping sewer systems. This device is simple, effective and has a long-time effect.
    Imagine a large office/apartment building without this feature.

  207. The #1 of all time: by Splatta · · Score: 1

    Its got to be Guttenberg's printing press.

  208. my 2� list of all time great hacks by AbbyD · · Score: 1

    I submit the following list of all time great hacks, in roughly chronological order:

    Pyramid at Giza
    Stonehenge
    Gutenberg's Press
    Tesla's AC motor
    Bell's Telephone
    Hughes' Spruce Goose
    Sikorsky's helicopter
    Nasa's Jetpack
    Kubrick's "2001: A SPace Odyssey"
    Apple's Macintosh

    --
    - Abby Digital -
  209. Re:Best Hack of all time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    compare loading Caldera to loading any Windoesn't

  210. TRS80 "Grabber"! by Pope · · Score: 1

    Any TRS-80 CoCo fans remember Tom Swift(?)'s game "Grabber?"
    It played multi-channel music on a computer than theoretically couldn't.
    That's a wicked hack.
    Along with the Apple ][ "Castle Wolfenstein" talking Nazis, and anything the Beagle Bros. did on the Apple ][.
    Ah, such simple days...
    (PS If anyone can get me a copy of "grabber" let me know! I Love that game!)

    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:TRS80 "Grabber"! by kkenn · · Score: 1

      Some of the old Apple ][ speaker hacks are amazing..along with the digitized speech in Wolfenstein (circa 1982?) there were several incarnations of multi-tone generators, which could wring 2, or even 3 simultaneous notes out of a single-bit toggle speaker (essentially a "clicker").

      There was even a program which could play 32KHz audio samples with very high quality by somehow doing timing magic with the speaker cone.

    2. Re:TRS80 "Grabber"! by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 1

      Yeah the good old days during the Carter administration. Boy having a peanut farmer for a president didn't hurt us one bit did it? Really low interest rates. Crime at an all time low. Don't forget about drug use, or the really low unemployment levels

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    3. Re:TRS80 "Grabber"! by funaho · · Score: 1

      And then there was Mega Music for the Apple II, which actually let you _sample_ sounds from the casette in port and play them back through the speaker. A damned fine piece of code, I remember being so amazed by it that I disassembled the whole thing, figured out how it worked and wrote an enhanced version (Mega Music Pro.)

    4. Re:TRS80 "Grabber"! by Pope · · Score: 1

      Well, don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!

      Pope

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  211. Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet little bug that even the biggest f***ing nuclear bomb can't kill... and they do strange sound when you walk on them!! That the greatest hack of all time and we talk about it even after 10 billion year...

  212. Bre-X Minerals Ltd. by strain2k · · Score: 1

    I don't think this has been posted yet and I believe it qualifies as a very impressive hack on the entire investment world. Billions of dollars were lost as a result of a small group of people and carefully crafted plan that very few people saw coming. The effects of which were felt world wide.

    strain
    I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not sure

  213. TRS80 "Grabber"! by Pope · · Score: 1

    Any TRS-80 CoCo fans remember Tom Swift(?)'s game "Grabber?"
    It played multi-channel music on a computer than theoretically couldn't.
    That's a wicked hack.
    Also, the Atari 400/800 used cassette tapes for loading programs, and played the damn binary data directly through the sound port, meaning it would come out the TV speaker. Everytime you loaded a program, you had to turn the volume down. That was stupid, the Vic20 and C64 didn't have that problem. Some genius figured out that you could put music on the unused audio tracks, and Voila! Music while you loaded the program!
    Along with the Apple ][ "Castle Wolfenstein" talking Nazis, and anything the Beagle Bros. did on the Apple ][.
    Ah, such simple days...
    (PS If anyone can get me a copy of "grabber" let me know! I Love that game!)

    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  214. Color TV by helleman · · Score: 3

    Taking something and making it more than it was. Yet another definition of hacking.

    Here's a sweet example of that. Color TV.

    TV seems pretty mundane and simple... till you start looking into it's origins.

    Here's a cool link that goes into the history of color TV.

    Imagine being tasked with the job of creating color TV - and then being told... oh ya... it has to work with the thousands of black and white TV's that are out there too. Doh!

    Very cool hack.

    Check it out.

    History of Color TV

    Man - today we are spoiled. Super powerful processors that crunch the heck out of digital data. Imagine if we could redesign color TV today? Oh wait a sec - isn't that what HDTV is all about? Ah, forget it. Too much red tape bs.

    Grin

    1. Re:Color TV by mmontour · · Score: 1

      That reminded me of this classic:

      This is from *New Scientist*, 2 Jul 1994.

      'Tis just 40 years since North American TV stations started broadcasting in
      colour, using the NTSC system. Officially NTSC was named after the National
      Television System Committee which chose it. Unofficially NTSC has often been
      called Never Thrice the Same Colour.

      A journalist who used to cover the NTSC told us recently of a lighter moment
      at the laboratories of the record company RCA in Princeton, New Jersey, where
      the system was developed. Team leader George Brown laid on a final
      transmission test. A colour camera was focused on a bowl of colourful fruit in
      one lab, and the received signal was displayed in another lab on a prototype
      colour tube. Just before the test Brown took a banana from the bowl and
      painted it blue.

      For the rest of the day the engineers at the receiving end struggled
      desperately to find out how their new system was faithfully reproducing the
      colour of red apples, orange oranges and green grapes, but resolutely
      converting yellow into blue.

  215. Correction... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    If you must have a civilian flightsim, you've no business citing MS Flight Simulator when 'X-Plane' exists. The latter uses blade element modelling to simulate all airplanes by actually simulating them- no lookup tables in this one- on a home computer! Ten years ago (never mind twenty) this was unimaginable.
    On the other hand, if you cite MS Flight Simulator you should really be citing the source it came from- SubLogic A2-FS1. At least that's how I knew it, I understand it was a crossplatform product. A graphical flight simulator on an Apple ][ was truly a great hack, and my understanding is that MS flight simulator began with a purchasing of the SubLogic product. Regardless, Bruce Artwick was there first. (apologies if I've got any facts wrong)

  216. Duff's Device by AT · · Score: 1

    Duff's Device

    A nice little hack that embeds a do/while loop somewhat non-inituitively in a switch statement. A true C hack. Although the stated purpose was to force the compiler to generate efficient assembly code, I think the assembly would have been more straight forward and clear.

  217. Skaven rocked Purple Motion silly :P by giggab00 · · Score: 1

    :) It really kicked ass, didn't it? It ran great on my 386SX25 with 2MB of RAM, so...

    Yep! That's because most if not all of the demos in those days were completely written in assembly. Remember how tiny they were? I guess they didn't call the parties Assembly '9* for no reason. Jeez.. so much memories... VECTOR BALLS rule! lol :P
    The relevant part of this is that why aren't today's coders opt for the effiency and technical challenge of the early day hackers rather than pumping out messy stuff quickly? There's something to be learned in this nostalgia trip.

  218. fine, but bill of rights more appropriate? by pal · · Score: 1

    the constitution is certainly an excellent document, but as long as we're talking about hacks -- why don't we just nominate the bill of rights?

    i mean, it's a patch!

    it says what it needs to say in terse form.

    it's timely even now (with some exceptions. i think the third ammendment is a bit outdated. and explicit mention of the figure "$20").

    and it's certainly more popularly known than the full text of the constitution. (although, i'd be willing to bet that a large number of people think that the bill of rights == the first amendment, and that it applies to everyone, not just the federal government).

    also, we may want to include the 14th amendment.

    am i spelling "amendment" wrong? bah.

    - pal

  219. Linux: Greatest Hack of ALL TIME! by oki900 · · Score: 0

    Linux has to be one of if not the greatest hack of all time. Bits and peices of code from all over the world originaly put together by Linus because he like many of us could not afford a comercial *NIX package. So he hacked his own version together, and whats more he gave it to everyone for free, including original source code. From this one hack that has not even been finished yet spawned many of the other great hacks, making Linux the father of the majority of the hacks from today. Not even Lopht Heavy Industries l0pht-crack put as much fear into Microsoft as Linux has. I think Linux is well deserved in the title 'GREATEST HACK OF ALL TIME'


    time: a measurment of how much time it takes for time to pass.

  220. Little hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sometimes its the little hacks of or on bigger things that stick out.

    * Hubbles corrective lense.
    (heck for that matter Hubble Space Telescope is a good mention as well.)
    * Unix. A Hacked up version of Multix just to play what video game?
    * Z80 CPU. A 'clone' of the 8086 that is still in wide use. Just noticed one on my SCSI controller yesterday!

  221. Microsoft for social engineering by TrentC · · Score: 1

    Why not? They've created an entire generation that believes:

    • The stuff that comes with the computer is good enough; there's little need to go looking elsewhere. (It worked for AOL, too!)
    • It's okay for a computer -- even mission-critical machines -- to crash every so often or not work quite right. (Something that will probably help Linux gain acceptance as hardware support matures...)
    • You HAVE to buy a new computer every couple of years to "keep up with the times". (Something that doubtlessly doesn't hurt Apple's bottom-line either; gotta move those 3rd-generation iMacs and G4s, after all...)
    • Acquiring technology from third parties and combining it with your own is "innovation".

    And in the process, they've taught a whole slew of people to rigorously defend their right to use crappy software. (Well, they do have the right to use crappy software; it's just funny that they want others to do so as well.)

    So come on, give credit where credit is due.

    Jay (=

  222. Ad astera per hackera by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
    Apollo 13 as a top 10 hack? Given the state of the technology at the time, getting there was amazing. Getting back when things went sour was incredible.
    Abso-fraggin-lutely. I remember seeing the scene in the Apollo 13 movie where the engineers are trying to assemble a C02 scrubber from the spare parts that would be available on the ship, and thinking to myself "I know these guys!
    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
    1. Re:Ad astera per hackera by Sehnsucht · · Score: 1

      And they really did assemble that thing!

      What they had in the movie looks exactly like what they built back then..

      My step-grandfather was FIDO at NASA during the time (Forget whether he was blue or gold, but I recall he wasn't on duty at the launch, it wasn't his shift, so..)

  223. In my experience by Nose · · Score: 1

    Maybe nobody will see this late post, but the best hacks I have seen all seem to involve duct tape. After all it IS one of the master substances in the universe (and who knows, may hold some of it together) I have yet to see anything that cannot be fixed with it. Break the handle on your suitecase? Need to keep all those pesky cables organized so that they won't move? Need something to hold your car's bumper on for a while? Duct tape can remedy all of these things. It is quick, does the job, and if you spend some time, can be a work of art too. Nose

    --
    Nose -Common Sense isn't.
  224. Social Engineering award for ... The GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides creating more flameage than just about any other topic, the GPL has led to great software for free (beer and liberty)! Seems to be a great hack to me. Joe Larkin

  225. Re:lowercase on the apple ][+ by poopie · · Score: 2

    I always thought that the Apple lowercase hack was pretty brilliant.

    The early computers didn't do much, and they were all more of a 'hack' for hackers than a productivity tool.

    The Apple ][+ default text display was 40X24 and there was NO LOWERCASE. You had to buy a special aftermarket PROM to support display of lowercase characters. Moreover, the *&%!# SHIFT KEY DIDN'T WORK ON LETTERS! So... some wordprocessing companies came up with the brilliant idea of wiring the paddle button from the connector to the shift key and using the 'paddle button' as a shift key!

    Imagine trying to sell a computer today that didn't have lowercase!

    pr#6

  226. C64 Kmart Hack by ShieldWolf · · Score: 1

    Man I used to do that too! Hehe, but for full effect yiu have to add a few commas after the print statement in order to stagger the text ;)
    10 PRINT "K-MART SUCKS ",,,
    20 GOTO 10'

    K-MART SUCKS
    K-MART SUCKS
    K-MART SUCKS
    ...

    ;)

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
  227. not all THAT innovative... by chialea · · Score: 2

    although the bouncing thing was extremely neat, it wasn't exactly original. in fact, the soviets used it quite a lot -- they just never got anything to work afterwards! (which I suppose means that the NASA version must have been different, at least. cooperation yields many dubious benefits)

    you should see some of the mars rovers they've got now -- very sweet, innovative hardware (the one I worked on was actually bought from russia) and software that will make them able to do actual WORK once we send em there.

    Lea

    1. Re:not all THAT innovative... by rde · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure whether it's stated explicitly in a definition, but a true hack should work; all due respect to our soviet chums, but when the result is a billion-rouble pancake on a distant world, it's... well it's not a hack.
      Anyway, I don't care who tried it first. I'm a bright-eyed, idealistic sort of chap who spends every day regretting the lack of an Irish space programme. You could tell me that Pathfinder was powered by ground-up dead babies, and that Sojourner runs on Windows. I'd still think it's great.
      Will I be watching the MPL on the internet, whatever godawful hour NASA decide to land at this time? Betcher ass.

      Oh. What sort of rovers? Any piccies? Specs?

  228. The Great Water Tower Caper by helleman · · Score: 1

    Here's a funny one! Enjoy. In the spirit of the MIT hacks, here's a Waterloo Hack!

    The Great Water Tower Caper

  229. "If At All Possible, Involve A Cow" by warmenhoven · · Score: 1
    The greatest practical joke book of all time is If At All Possible, Involve A Cow by Neil Steinberg. One of the best that I read was by Caltech.

    Apparently, there was a group of students who wanted to turn the HOLLYWOOD sign into a CALTECH sign. "Each of the 9 letters in the sign is 5 stories tall and 33 feet across. They are also surrounded by razor-sharp concertina wire, and patrolled by the park service."

    They were originally going to cover it with burlap, but decided to go with plastic instead. They were given $200 by the University, by calling themselves the Prank Club and requesting club funds. They made giant templates to cover the H, part of the O, turn the L to an A (with white plastic), etc.

    The job started at 1 a.m. and was finished by 5 a.m. In the morning, TV and media types had flocked to it. "One TV report featured a pair of German tourists asking how old the CALTECH sign was and trying to get directions to the HOLLYWOOD sign."

    Now that is a great hack.

    -----

    --

    -----
    "A man is judged by his every word." -RW Emerson
    "They misunderestimated me." -GW Bush
  230. Re:Clifford Stoll -- LOOK OUT!!!!!!!!!!! by Pliny · · Score: 1

    I met Stoll once... Very thoughtful guy, almost killed someone with a yo-yo too. Definetly cool.

    --
    What does this button d$#%* NO CARRIER
  231. Technological Terror? by Webster_McRiley · · Score: 1

    Hey come on now. We all know there in only one tecnological terror in this universe and its the DEATH STAR!!!

  232. 10 Greatest Hacks by Skip666Kent · · Score: 0

    1. The Bible - Damn! You know those towel-headed bastards are still laughing in their graves!

    2. Stonehenge - "Hey Thor! Remember that chick who wouldn't go out with me? Check out what I did on her Dad's front lawn! Hehe!"

    3. The Original(TM) Trojan Horse - others have mentioned this and they're right. The concept has infused itself very solidly in pop and computer culture. This has to be on the list.

    4. Orson Welle's War of the World's radio broadcast. No explanation neccessary. Brilliant.

    5. Linux - Gnu, BSD, yes I know, but THIS is the one that captured the imaginations of millions of different folks, to grow farther and further than anyone, let alone it's lowly ;) instigator could have foretold.

    6. Milli Vanilli - They've suffered enough. Give those guys some credit!

    7. The Spanish Inquisition - 'cause NO ONE expects the Spanish Inquisition!

    8. The First Apollo Moon Landing - No event has ever captured and congealed the public's imagination as effectively as this. Not even World War II. Well...

    9. Alexander Graham Bell's telephone - The very life blood from which so many other, lesser hacks followed.

    10. Larry 'Bud' Melman - Propelled to stardom. Who'd a thought?!

    --
    **>>BELCH
  233. A history of the M16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the M16 as designed is a spectacularly reliable weapon, however, it was "forced" upon the US Army who preferred the "old school" large-caliber, wooden-stocked M14.

    The concepts of small-caliber, high-velocity (ammo is lighter, so you can carry more; round is much higher energy, so it does more damage; lighter round doesn't travel as far, but most infantry engagements happen at 400m or less) were a tough sell to the current generalship. When they were forced to use it, they changed the ammo specification from the very clean burning design propellant to the existing, dirty propellant used in the M14 and M1.

    The result - jammed and fouled weapons.

    Anybody who had an M16 jam on them in Vietnam can blame that on sour grapes generals attempting to sabotage the weapon. They couldn't stop the weapon's aquistion, so they mucked with the ammo spec instead to give the weapon a bad reputation.

    The M16A1 added the "forward assist" to help clear jams - but at the same time, the ammo was respecified back to the design propellant. Bingo! No more jams.

    As long as you kept the thing reasonably well oiled, an M16 should never jam. In fact, I've used one (with lots of full mags ready, and an oil bottle handy) as a SAW - firing extended lengths at full auto with no jams.

    I've also seen a SAW based on the M16 action that nobody ever bought, the FN SAW being an excellent weapon in its own right.

    My favourite version of the M16 has to be the Canadian C7A1, with a thicker barrel, a fantastic optical sight, and a cartridge deflector bulge that allows use by southpaws. It also retains the full auto capablilty of the original M16 (Canadians can apperently teach fire discipline to their troops) Using this weapon, a complete novice can shoot 2" groups at 400m all day.

    Comparing the AK47 to the M16 is a Yugo to a Ferrari - except that this Ferrari is a whole lot cheaper. The AK is cheaper yet - as long as you don't have to hit anything at over about 150m, you don't mind the extra weight of the weapon and ammo, and you don't mind it beating the crap out of you when you shoot it. :)

    That's not to say the AK is a bad design - when you consider the requirements, it's a fantastic design - but the M16 is just soooo much better.

    However, I don't think either weapon qualifies as a hack in the Slashdot sense.

    1. Re:A history of the M16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When they were forced to use it, they changed the ammo specification from the very clean burning design propellant to the existing, dirty propellant used in the M14 and M1.

      The result - jammed and fouled weapons.

      How is the M16 a "spectacularly reliable" weapon when it jams using powder that its predecessors ate flawlessly?

      Using this weapon, a complete novice can shoot 2" groups at 400m all day.
      Speaking as someone who owns, shoots, and builds these rifles, this is a bit of an exaggeration. (Run that through Babelfish and it'll say "bullshit".) It is possible to shoot that well with an M16, but only with a great deal of expensive customization and the very best ammo. And even then it takes skill. A highly-trained marksman firing from a prone position with a match-tuned rifle could be very proud of turning in a 2" group at 400m.
    2. Re:A history of the M16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who trained, coached, and led soldiers using this weapon for over 10 years, I can tell you that there's no exaggeration there - assuming you're using the Canadian C7A1 varient with the optical sight.

      Accuracy degrades signifigantly using iron sights.

      And as for "spectactularly reliable" - use the right powder, keep it oiled, and you can get it as dirty as you want and as hot as you want and it'll still fire just fine, thank you very much.

      All that crap about M16s jamming is - one the ammo was specced right - just a myth.

      And while we're at it, all that crap about the NATO 5.56 round not having any penatrative power is bullshit too - I, personally, have used a 5.56 SAW to chop down a cinder block wall. The 5.56 will penatrate pretty well any wall, tree, or other natural obstacle you choose to shoot through.

      It may not penatrate the standard issue helmet at one mile like the 7.62 does, but up close (600m or less), it's just fine.

    3. Re:A history of the M16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may not penatrate the standard issue helmet at one mile like the 7.62 does, but up close (600m or less), it's just fine.

      Yeah yeah... but some of us still vaguely miss the reassuring heft of a FN C1A1. And besides, it's much more effective for making clueless recruits hold out at arms length.

  234. Not all Paul Allen's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look at photo.net/bg. The author quotes the book "Hard Drive" in saying that while Paul Allen did write most of the emulator, a Harvard student named Monte Davidoff wrote the floating point operations part. Paul Allen did do some cool stuff, though.

    1. Re:Not all Paul Allen's by commbat · · Score: 1

      The story I heard is that floating point routines aren't that hard to code, but it's considered 'drudge work.' Gates and Allen were in the library discussing how neither of them wanted to code it when a fellow student volunteered.

      --
      'Intellectual Properties' are uncontrollable in the wild. To base an economy on them is just stupid.
  235. VI & NFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Billy is probably the best hacker to date, NFS, VI and not to forget, Sun, kicks ass.

  236. What about the brown sugar? by CerebusArtifact · · Score: 0

    What kind of grits? Did they have brown sugar on them? That's how I like my grits...maybe a little bit of honey too. Yumm...that sounds good. BTW, wtf does this have to do with the apple ][?

    --
    "Come to hate hypocrisy and evil thought; for it is the thought that gives birth to hypocrisy; but hypocrisy is far from
  237. EMACS! Possibly the greatest software hack of all by fiid · · Score: 1

    I think that Emacs is possibly one of the greatest software hacks of all time.

    I think it is possibly one of the oldest and still in wide use pieces of application software there is. It is still featureful, and I in fact still use it on a daily basis.

    Just my 1.25p (2 cents ;-) )

    --
    Fiid - Ryhmes with Squid. Software Engineer
  238. Star Wars/SDI by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
    I can't find any corroborating evidence, but a friend of mine told me he saw a special on Discovery/TLC/PBS/etc. that the whole Star Wars/Strategic Defence Initiative thing from the Reagan years was, essentially, a hoax.

    A special, and incredibly top-secret task force of, yes, science fiction authors, including Robert Heinlein, Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle and many others was convened for the specific purpose of writing the "Star Wars Bible" which would define the technology that would be used to "develop" the SDI stuff. In this show some of these authors were supposed to have been interviewed and commented about the whole thing.

    However, the intent of SDI was *not* to actually develop these things, but to build a believable enough facade of R&D and press release type material that the "Damn Russkies" would blow their budget trying to make their own version of such so they could stay in the race. The only people who knew this was a hoax were the authors and the few government people who put the plan together. Everyone else was told it was legitimate and to do their best to make it reality and given enough budget to make it look good but not enough to break the bank.

    This is also the point at which RAH and Arthur C. Clarke were supposed to have had their big split and stopped talking to each other. "RAH" wanted to bust the "damned commies" back to the stone age if possible, where ACC didn't think this was a very moral or ethical application of his knowledge and skills.

    One thing that makes me believe this could be a true story is that if you read Niven/Pournelle's "Footfall" there's a "task force" set up to come up with wacky outrageous ideas to fight the alien invaders consisting entirely of, you guessed it, sci-fi authors. They all go by pseudonyms but the behavioural and personalities developed by Niven/Pournelle are obviously a group of well-known authors, in fact the same group of authors supposedly reported to have been involved in the SDI "hoax." I know enough about Niven's twisted sense of humour that it strikes me as exactly the sort of thing he'd do: present a real, but ostensibly top-secret project as a bunch of characters in a science fiction book - obviously made-up.

    The other thing is that this isn't the usual "Friend-of-a-Friend" story - a friend of mine claims to have seen the show first-hand and he's not the sort to imagine or make this sort of thing up. In fact he called me the next day specifically to tell me about the cool TV show he'd seen the night before.

    Does anyone else have any references that could corroborate this story? If so, it sure sounds like a "Great Hack" although also possibly one of the least ethical and most destructive hacks I can think of as there were also supposed to be many Soviet military and government types on the show who reported that they had sunk a large amount of monetary and human resources into trying to develop their own SDI program, which, while surely not the single cause, contributed at least in part to the Soviet Union going bust and collpasing.

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    1. Re:Star Wars/SDI by Jefe · · Score: 1

      I have no special knowledge of this, but I'm sceptical...

      SDI was wholy consistent with the military atmosphere of the Reagan administration. Namely, don't worry about cost, feasibility, or even need -- the $$ all goes to our contractor friends anyway. And besides, wouldn't it be GREAT if we could nuke those gaddam ruskies without worrying about any bombs landing here! The USSR was rightly worried that if the US succeeded they'd find themselves at the business end of a nuclear first strike.

      Interestingly, George W. has started talking about SDI again too. Presumably the pretext is 'rouge states' -- but again, the more likely reason is that he's fine with transferring $$ to defense contractors and he'd really like it to work -- it would allow the US to use nukes as it suits us.

    2. Re:Star Wars/SDI by ggwood · · Score: 1

      In the biography of Reagan, on A&E, a US cable television channel, it was put fairly bluntly that the US and the USSR leaderships were willing to completely disarm all nuclear weapons - as long as Reagan was willing to stop the SDI, which he wasn't.
      The web site for A&E's biography program is http://www.biography.com/, unfortunately it does not contain transcripts of the programs, most likely because they are selling copies of the show for about US$15.
      I believe the program I was watching was: Ronald Reagan: Role of a Lifetime, (however there seems to be a second biography program about him, so I might be wrong.) I recall the meeting was in Poland, but I could easily be wrong. It wasn't the most famous meeting, and it wasn't one where any big results were attained.

      --
      a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
    3. Re:Star Wars/SDI by sundance · · Score: 1

      I saw this program (or another on the same topic on the BBC). It was I believe part of a documentary series about the collapse of the Eastern Block. Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle were interviewed (playing computer games - memory escapes me, but I do not think it was Missile Command), claiming that their plan had brought about the downfall of the "Evil Empire". That was what worried me, they kept calling it the "Evil Empire". But you're friend is not making it up, I saw this myself.

  239. IBM PC by NickHolland · · Score: 1

    How about the original IBM PC?

    It has developed a life of its own. It has influenced the design of virtually all small computers in the world today. Almost 20 years after the thing was developed/hacked together, we are still living with its design defects/choices:

    * It has influenced the design not only of later computers, but even chips. All modern Intel processors after the '286 was called "brain dammaged" for its incomplete emulation of the 8086/88 have had complete binary compatability with the 8088.
    * the "real mode" (related to the above)
    * the 640k DOS memory segment and the corresponding memory hole between 640k and 1M.
    * The system ROM located in the midst of the system RAM.
    * The ISA bus.
    * The resolution changing monitor (o.k., that was a later "innovation", which if it isn't clear from my tone, I have zero respect for. I much prefer that the computer would power up in one video mode/resolution, and STAY THERE!).
    * The shortage of available interupts.
    * DOS: The OS that won't quite die.

    I'm sure with a little thought, we can all add to this list...

    The only question is, was it a hack? I would argue it is, based on the apparently rapid development, the lack of careful planning, etc. Your call! 8-)

    Nick.

  240. a bowl of grits (OT).. by Wah · · Score: 1

    is this guy's euphemism for masturbation. He's been doing it a lot lately....

    --
    +&x
  241. patch - tiny, elegant, worldshaking by rise · · Score: 1

    Think about it. Larry Wall took the standard tape / full source distribution method and turned it inside out. One tiny program that cut to the heart of the problem: that code users only care about the changes once they have the source. It made distributed incremental development (and thus the modern Open Source movement) feasible.

  242. Re:Voyager -- GreatHack by bSMfh+(bastard+Scout · · Score: 1

    Yup. The whole voyager project was that way. The voyager programmers and engineers deserve a big trophy for that!

    "Let's take advantage of the trip to collect data on something else, like 2 other planet flybys" and then they upload new machine code to do more.... They hacked maximum useage out of those little buggers, and they did it from such a great distance. And they're still going!
    JPL link
    --willydog

  243. A TRS-80 by miket · · Score: 1

    We still have three of them here at work. I keep trying to convince my boss to give me one or two of them. He even has the origonal manuals here!!

    --
    Imagination is more important than knowledge. --Albert Einstein
  244. My Top 10 by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, I'm an aircraft buff, so they weigh pretty heavy in my list: 1) Apollo 13. Can't add much info to what has already been said. 2) Linux. Nuff said. 3) Perl. Nuff said (again). 4) Voyager. Burt Rutan's round the world un-refueled aircraft. First drawings were on a napkin (typical for Rutan) in a diner in the desert. Aircraft flew all the the way around the world (after damaging it's wingtips on takeoff and being brutally slammed 90 degrees on it's side in a thunderstorm over Africa) and still landed with something like 20 gallons of fuel. 5) SR-71. See previous posts. Damn near anything Kelly Johnson worked on kicked ass. Starting with the p-38, up to the stealth fighter (although the stealth fighter is the ugliest thing he ever created). 6) Unix. Gotta love the shear simplicity behind unix. Truly the reason for it's strength and beauty. Can't think of any more at the moment

    --
    Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
  245. Re:I like the story of the RobinHood/Friar Tuck ha by sconeu · · Score: 1

    It's also in the Jargon File rev 3.0.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  246. THe greatest hack ever by BukDuy · · Score: 2

    Is the English language itself. Just ask anyone trying to learn it. And yes it is amusing sometimes

    --
    "Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
  247. MacGuyver and cutting torches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember the episode where he DIDN'T have one of the afforementioned cutting torches, and had to get the two security guards out of the locked armoured car before the bomb inside went off?

    He built one (cutting torch, that is,) out of a barbeque lighter and a 10-speed bike!

    So it wouldn't matter if the bad guys left him with a cutting torch or not.. :o)

  248. Pyramids of Egypt by Greg+W. · · Score: 2

    If the Apollo space program can be considered a hack, then I nominate the pyramids of Egypt.

    People are still impressed by them thousands of years after they were built.

  249. Collossus by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    The Collossus was better. It was designed and built by a guy from the post office (name was Flowers I think), who was somehow related to the project because they used speciall runners to carry messages back and forth. Anyway, this guy decides to use vacuum tubes to build a computer. Everybody thought he was crazy, but he actually did it, and IIRC it contained @1500 vacuum tubes, way more than the number of rollers in Turing's bombe (well, not really Turing's). Turing seems to be credited with all this great stuff. Anyay, the Collossus was used to crack the new German modulo2 arithmetic codes. It only took, like 15 minutes to crack a code, instead of DAYS of people working around the clock. Really great, really an ingenious good hack.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:Collossus by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Oh, yeah, it was the first Allied /general/ programmable computer. The bombe was a specific application. I believe Collossus's behavior could be modified.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:Collossus by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      A page with info on the Collossus, whose development was lead by Dr. Tommy Flowers (not Turing) of the Post Office Research Laboratories in London:

      http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~u6rs/turing/collossus .html

      It was innovative in that it used vaccuum tubes, read automatically from tape (the first real input device!) and was a bit programmable.

      This gets my vote...hope it's moderated up.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  250. Andy Kauffman faking his own death... by anactofgod · · Score: 1

    I know it's not "technical", but it does fall under the MIT definition of a "hack".

    What was more brilliant than this?

    ...anactofgod...

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    1. Re:Andy Kauffman faking his own death... by copito · · Score: 2

      Even better than that, Andy Kaufmann created a character, Tony Clifton, that everyone knew was Andy, but was played in many cases by Bob Zmuda.
      --

      --
      "L'IT c'est moi!"
  251. Duct Tape by Wah · · Score: 2

    a hacker's dream...

    getting me back to civilization with bailing wire and duct tape.

    I anyone has fixed a malfunctioning computer solely with Duct Tape, please raise your hand (and ignore curious stares).

    *raises hand*

    --
    +&x
    1. Re:Duct Tape by Nalgas+D.+Lemur · · Score: 1

      if anyone has made a wallet, bag, belt, or article of clothing solely with duct tape, please raise your hand :P

      *raises hand*

      duct tape pants anyone?

      -Nalgas D. Lemur

    2. Re:Duct Tape by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      I was sent the wrong drive rails for a computer at work that had to be up and running the day we got it. I ran duct tape across the inside of the case and set the drive on top of the little "hammock". A week later, I stayed late and put the rails in. Nobody ever knew. It's not quite what Appolo 13 did with their duct tape, but I did "fix" a computer with duct tape.

      -Barry

    3. Re:Duct Tape by emmons · · Score: 1

      hmm.. I guess this counts

      When I worked as a tech at Best Buy and a custy brought in a computer and a hard/floppy/cd/-drive that needed to be installed into a computer which required rails, we always gave them the option of ordering the $30 rails or letting us be creative. Of course we made them sign that they agreed we could use unorthodox methods, but it was always interesting what some of us hacked up. Usually it involved large amounts of duct tape and prayers.

      -----

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    4. Re:Duct Tape by Chameleon · · Score: 1

      I had a crappy Compaq that needed a CD drive. The mounting rails haven't been made since 1950 :-) so I just wedged a few floppy drives between it and the top of the case.
      --
      Chris Dunham
      http://www.tetrion.com/~chameleo/index.html

    5. Re:Duct Tape by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      I'm an SCA'er and a couple of times I MADE my armor entirely out of duct tape and cardboard. ('cept the brainbucket, of course)

      I had a friend calibrate various areas with a two-hander, and I just added cardboard till it stopped hurting. (After one calibrating ribshot at full tilt, I realized we were standing next to a '32 Rolls Royce. We moved.:P )

      Actually, it worked amazingly well. I even managed to convince several marshalls that Duct tape + cardboard + idiot = 'Rigid Material' per armor specs.

      I was kind of infamous in the local area for a while regarding that.

      Although cardboard armor was a bit of a hack the first time, I doubt it would make the top 10^6 greatest hacks.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
  252. MS-DOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates faked out IBM that he could write an OS by buying the QDOS CP/M plagarism from a fellow Seattle hacker. Faked out the rest of too, laughing all the way to the bank.

  253. MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVERYTHING ELSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Okay this may nor be a hack, in the fact that it is not physical, but all of these have changed the way we think about the world around us.

    -Newtonian physics -general relativity -quantum theory(uncertanty and all that)

    I mean think about it. Could you have come up with all this shizatch on your own. When you were a kid, did you think, hey I am attracted by gravity to the ground in an amount directly proportional to the product of my mass and the earth's mass, and inversely proportional to the distances between our centers of mass. Or maybe the idea that light is the universal speed limit, that matter is another form of energy, and that the amount of energy in a given amount of matter is the mass of the matter times the square of the speed of light. And so forth.

    This is the reason I'm trying to figure out Calculus without any books.

    Remember without all of these there would be no moon launch, no computers well you get the idea.

  254. OS-9 on the CoCo by fatboy · · Score: 2

    I used to run a multi-user multi-tasking operating system on my old Tandy Color Computer called OS-9. It was very cool for the late 80's. I had a c compiler and a basic programming language called Basic-09.

    It also had a native windowing interface as well as Desktop Enviroment called "Multi view".

    You have never really used a computer until you cobbel your own custom boot disk ;) It makes a linux kernel compile look as easy as typing sys a:\ under dos.

    --
    --fatboy
  255. Better military hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    The fuel tank liner of the SR-71 blackbird was melting due to excessie heat during mutltiple mach speed runs. To rectify, the liner was REMOVED, so that the plane leaks almost all its fuel before it even gets off the ground, reqiring a refueling in the air shortly thereafter. As the planes outer hull heats up, it expands and seals the tanks! Now *THAT* is a hack.

    On top of that, the plane was so far ahead of its time there STILL aren't any faster planes... 30 years later.

    1. Re:Better military hack. by TurkishGeek · · Score: 1

      On top of that, the plane was so far ahead of its time there STILL aren't any faster planes... 30 years later.

      Umm, there still are not any faster unclassified aircraft. Rumors about "Aurora" abound, plus I don't think the US would have retired Blackbird without a viable replacement.


      --

      BluetoothCentral.com
      A site for everything Bluetooth. Coming in January 2000.

      --
      Zigbee Central: A Zigbee weblog
    2. Re:Better military hack. by Niko. · · Score: 1

      Definitely a great hack, but I believe that instead of the fuel mostly leaking before takeoff they just didn't fill it up, since multiple aerial refuels were necessary for almost all missions anyway, and it's easier and safer to get off the ground if lighter.

      BTW, SR-71 operational cost was around $200k *per hour*.

  256. tempest music by technoCon · · Score: 2

    I recall reading a program listing in "Creative Computing" magazine that when poked in and run would cause the computer (mebbe a TRS80 or Apple II or earlier) to emit EMI signals that could be detected on an AM radio placed atop the computer. (At that time, my Rockwell and many of my friends' TI calculators could be heard on the AM band when you told them to calculate large factorials.) The article said that this program would play the Minute Waltz on your AM Radio.

    I just need to find an attic wherein is stored a stack of '78 vintage computer magazines.

  257. Alternating Current Electricity by bSMfh+(bastard+Scout · · Score: 1

    Tesla (not the band, the inventor)
    another
    Remember the story about the new york police station shaking so bad stuff was walking off the tables, and they eventually figured out it was a machine Nikola was testing in his lab, blocks away?

  258. Morse Code by beens · · Score: 1

    It seems like morse code would be up on the list...to take an almost arbitrary sequence of sounds, assign them to letters, find a way to transmit and recieve, and then make it a standard is pretty impressive....

  259. Welding a train to the tracks by Spiff+T · · Score: 1

    This hack (MIT style) happened it Boston, I believe it was MIT (My dad told me about it, he was at harvard in the late 60's) What happened was that when a commuter train pulled up to a station some students were waiting and promptly welded the wheels to the tracks while it was stopped.

    1. Re:Welding a train to the tracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it is related, but that WAS done at UofT by the engnieers to the street cars on college street. One guy distracted the driver, the others quickly welded the wheels to the track... classig BFC.. not that they exist or anything. I don't know a thing. Honest.

  260. Greatest hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me suggest the old original Spacewar (pdp1x version), probably the first interactive video game and a great program that wasted almost infinite amounts of everyone's time and taught some folks some good programming lessons.

  261. Magic! by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    How about this story about magic? Don't know if it could be called a "hack", but it sure is interesting:

    http://www.netmeg.net/jargon/hacker_folklore/a_s tory_about_magic.html

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  262. The Electric Guitar by bSMfh+(bastard+Scout · · Score: 1

    Les Paul and Leo Fender made it what it is today.
    Search for more

  263. Woz's blue box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I nominate Woz's (and to a much lesser degree, Jobs') Blue Box. The full account is detailed by Woz at his web site under the "Answers to letters" or something like that, but in a nutshell: Woz and Jobs managed to get into Stanford Linear Accelerator's library. While rummaging around, they found an AT&T technical manual about the phone system. Woz then took the info and made a digital device that could trick the telco's hardware into giving away free phone calls. As I understand it, they actually managed to get the circuit boards manufactured, they sold so many around college. The previous methods of phone hacking (phreaking) involved using ad hoc devices like whistles from Captain Crunch boxes.

  264. Lisp Eval Hack by velosa · · Score: 1

    S.R. Russell working with McCarthy noticed that an interpreter for the new programming language they were working on, Lisp, could be created by simply hand coding the function eval. He did that and poof an interpreter was born.

    Now where's that calculation for an infinite improbability drive?

    See
    http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/lisp/no de3.html

    for more details.

    Enjoy!
    -Nathan

  265. OH YES THE BEAGLE BROS!!! by earache · · Score: 1
    God, whatever happened to them ... they wrote the coolest shit for the Apple ][.

    *sob*

    the sinister mister earache.

  266. 10 Computer Hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm going to confine my list to computers just because I can.

    • 10
      Eunice -- Kashtan proves a point.
    • 9
      The Morris Worm -- rtm implements the ideas in his Unix vulnerability paper, plus a couple more.
    • 8
      Xerox Star/Macintosh -- Xerox invents windows and the networked personal computer, Apple builds it.
    • 7
      The Altair -- Small is beautiful, and the masses love it.
    • 6
      The Analytical Engine -- Even though he never built it, Charles Babbage executed an astonishing design hack.
    • 5
      The Turing Machine -- Alan Turing gives us a way to think about general computation.
    • 4
      ENIAC -- The first general purpose electronic computer.
    • 3
      The Internet -- DARPA lays a golden egg.
    • 2
      The Transistor -- William Shockley may be a dough-head racist, but he sure helped computer technology along.
    • And the number one all time computer hack:
      The web/HTTP/HTML -- Tim Berners-Lee has changed our lives forever.
  267. Yep - is a UL by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
    see here

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

  268. Cooler than that.. by jcr · · Score: 1


    The greatest hack in the Apple ][ was Woz's disk controller card. Now *that* was a masterpiece.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Cooler than that.. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Not as much as the video control circuitry...
      -- ----------------------------------------------
      Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!

  269. You forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story of Mel. I'm surprised in all the hundreds of comments here, noone's mentioned this classic hack.

  270. The musical floppy drive by Captain+Gingersnaps · · Score: 1
    Does anyone recall a program, either on the C64 or Apple II that would spin the the floppy drive so that it played a song? I can't remember if I actually had it, or just heard someone talk about it. If real, I'd have to call it a classic.

    I tend to favor the "using technology for a purpose for which it was never intended" definition of hack. A lot of the suggestions I've seen so far seem to me to be just examples of really good engineering.

  271. Greatest Hack - (But don't ask me to prove it.) by Stainless+Steel+Rat · · Score: 1

    My first nomination has to go to GOD. To create a universe from just the word of mouth...ouch! And man from dust? Talk about an unusual use of system resources. All this in six days to boot. Now before I get people e-mailing me about evolution vs. creationism, look at it this way. If creationism is wrong, then my second nomination has to go to the guy (St. Peter?) who started modern organized religion. To come up with these ideas and then get half the world to believe it - truely remarkable.

  272. heh by EggMann · · Score: 1

    " The hackers wrote of their own "rooting" exploits (that is, hacking the root directory of a server) "

    oh rooting is hacking the root directory? shucks, wtf have i been doing looking for that superuser account!

  273. There's a tree in that car! by Chris+Colohan · · Score: 1

    At the University of Toronto, it is traditional that the graduating engineering classes errect some sort of prank for people to remember them by. Every year, the mechanical engineers seem to find some creative place to put an old car. But one year they came up with the ultimate hack.

    Walking up the main road into campus one day, I noticed that a tree was growing up through the centre of a parked car. Doing a double take, I realized that this maple tree was at least 10 years old, and unlike the car, it had been there the day before.

    It took very close examination to figure out how this car came to be parked with a tree through it. The facilities staff assigned to getting rid of the car didn't figure it out, and ended up chopping the car in half with cutting torches in order to remove it.

    The car had no engine in it. The frame had a tree-trunk sized slot cut through it, starting at the centre of the front bumper. But before cutting this slot, the hood, front grill, windsheild, and bumper were removed. So to install this work of art (late at night), the perpetrators simply had to wheel the U-shaped car around the tree, and then quickly re-install the windshield, hood, grill and bumper. They did this quickly enough that the regular campus police patrols never even noticed.

  274. Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have read through almost all these posts and notice that one marvelous piece of equipment is missing. Considering that this piece of equipment is in almost every home and used everyday, but forgotten from here says something about much we take it for granted.

    The refrigerator.

    Cold beer anyone?

  275. Barbie and GI Joe Brain transplant by Croaker · · Score: 2

    I just remembered this clever hack...

    A few years back, there was a controversy over a talking Barbie doll which included, among other phrases "math is hard!"

    Well, a bunch of folks, fed up with the stupid blond stereotype, decided that Barbie needed a bit of motivational therapy. They bought some of the talking Barbies, and some talking GI Joes, and proceded to do a brain transplant.

    So, you'd have Barbie barking orders like "we must attack the enemy headquarters!!!" while the emasculated GI Joes would suggest having a pjama party...

  276. A MIT style "hack" in Finland (we call it J�yn�) by rc · · Score: 2
    I recall this winner "hack" from my university's prank competition some years ago:

    Some years ago the students of the Helsinki University of Technology (teekkarit) did this "hack" of buying a single park bench from the City of Helsinki and subsequently carrying it arround Helsinki on 1st May evening among the festivities.

    They were stopped multiple times by the police, but every time they showed the receipt for owning the bench and eventually the police circulated the information of the "prank" the students of HUT are doing by carrying their own bench arround the town.

    Now this radio broadcast was monitored by the students and right after it a crowd of them was assembled and every bench in Helsinki's parks were carried away into a giant pile in the middle of the central park of Helsinki.

    Correct me if I messed some detail up, as I wasn't there at the time.

  277. Re:flamebait? by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

    Was it the bit about Larry 'Bud'? I'm SORRY!

    ; )


    -kent

    --
    **>>BELCH
  278. Gandhi's da Man! by extrasolar · · Score: 2

    Gandhi virtually invented non-violent protest. That is quite a hack giving that no one knew of doing that at the time! Martin Luther King Jr was infuenced by Gandhi and is one of the reason's the civil rights movement worked so well.

    I'd definitely give Gandhi a slot on the top ten list.

  279. The original IBM PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my college professors, Dr. David Bradley of IBM, was one of the 12 original designers of the IBM PC. He gave a presentation during one class that included a slide show of pictures taken during the early stages of the PC. The picture of the original PC was not done in a board. It was completely wired tied. I saw the picture. It was even done with all one color wire, white. Now that is amazing. I have wired up a few boards in my carreer, but I could not imagine trying to wire that thing up. It was amazing that it worked.

  280. I submit the Dual Processor VAX. by MuyJuan · · Score: 1
    In the summer of 1981 George Goble and some pals at Purdue University built what he claims is the world's first multiprocessor UNIX machine. This truly is an outstanding hardware hack; the original technical report can be found at

    http://ghg.ecn.purdue.edu/vax/paper.html

    This was not only an impressive feat of engineering, but also economically sound, since George basically produced a machine with twice (benchmarked at 1.9) the computational power as an 11/780, with none of the maintainance costs (George did all the computer maintainance for PU). The additional cost in materials for this increase in performance was 22% of the cost of a new computer.

    George was famous for ditzing around with hardware. The HKN lounge in the EE building at Purdue was filled with formerly broken arcade games like Red Baron, Tank and Vortex that George had bought (or just plain carted away as a favor), fixed, uploaded the code and done some alterations that he thought made them more fun. George also won an Ig Nobel prize in chemistry in 1996 for lighting a charcoal grill to cooking temperature in 3 seconds.

  281. Archemedes had lots of neat hacks by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Including one to make water run uphill (The Archemedes screw.) IIRC, he invented the steam engine too, and was told to drop the idea by his Upper Management ("What will we do with all the slaves?") (I may be thinking of someone else.)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  282. C64 - sprites in the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you want to talk about esoteric computer hacks, this one blew me away when I first saw it and I still find it amazing to think about. If you don't know what I'm talking about, it's having graphics in the borders of the Commodore 64, in space that simply isn't addressable. It was done by hitting hardware registers at exactly the time the electron gun is aimed a certain pixel, which turns off the border to show sprites that are hidden there. It required writing code that was so timing critical that if the cpu was off by a clock cycle it wouldn't work. Ahhh the glory days....

    1. Re:C64 - sprites in the border by T-Punkt · · Score: 1

      > Ahhh the glory days....
      Yes, I remember them too.

      One thing that made the timing so difficult was that the VIC was regularly halting the CPU for its memory accesses. Eg. every 8th line (to read bitmap data), if the screen (the interior) is enabled. And it get's even more complicated, if there are sprites.

      That's why most "no border demos" work either below or over the display area, where timings were
      easier.

      BTW: If anybody is interested, how this works:

      The VIC normally displays 40x25 characters (or 320x25 (Multicolour 160x25) pixels.). But you can
      make the screen somewhat smaller, i.e. reduce the size to 24 vertically and/or 38 horizontally. (The purpose of that was nice scrolling, so that one
      lines of chars can smothly vanish behind (say)
      the top boarder an a new one can appear from the
      bottom.)

      The trick to switch of the vertical boarder goes
      now like this: The VIC normally (i.e. 25 line screen) starts the display area at raster line 50
      and the vertical boarder at line 250, with an
      24 character lines screen at ~246 (I'm not shure).

      If you reduce the screen to 24 lines shortly befor line 250, the VIC "thinks" it has already switched
      the boarder on at line 246. Now you have an area,
      where you can play around with sprites, or display
      patterns:

      One of the strangest things of the VIC was, that if it doesn't have any character/bitmap
      information anymore (i.e. around the display area, where normally the boarders are), it repeats displaying a pattern of black and the background colour of the display area, controlled by the contents of byte $3FFF (the last byte) in the active bank. I guess it was a hardware bug...
      well, not a bug, because it normaly shows the boarders then.

      Ahh, it was fun playing with this little bastard...

  283. Maybe not... by kaphka · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure I'd count the first NES emu as a hack... At least not a technological hack. (It was an important social hack, since it reminded the public that "software" is information, not floppy disks and cartridges.)

    On the other hand, UltraHLE was quite a hack. As I understand it, the creators of UltraHLE ("High Level Emulator") basically gave up on trying to actually duplicate an N64, which would be prohibitively complicated, and instead concentrated on emulating the most visible parts of the system. In other words, UltraHLE is kind of like Eliza... it doesn't actually emulate an N64, it just fakes it.

    Of course, this also means that UltraHLE could never really be improved upon significantly without rewriting it from scratch.

    (I apologize if some of my info about UltraHLE is wrong... I haven't paid attention to the emu scene in quite a while.)

    --

    MSK

  284. Atari 2600 games by CaseyB · · Score: 2
    I nominate any and all games ever made for the Atari 2600. Developing _any_ game under the insanely tight contraints this sytem placed on a programmer is impressive -- developing the amazingly fun games I played as a kid is downright incredible.

    Some 2600 'features':

    1. No VSync. Every 2600 game had to count lines and keep an exact constant framerate _manually_.
    2. A total of 4KB ROM and 128 bytes of RAM to work with.

    Read this Case History from 1983 in IEEE SPectrum for some more insight into 2600 development.

    Also see this interview. Best quote: "The early games [...] were 2K games and the old programmers looked down on us kids for using 4K because only a wimp would need 4K :)"

    1. Re:Atari 2600 games by bonbonne · · Score: 1

      You can also consider the people who develop under the HP 48 calculator : They made games like civilisation (grey levels)or Doom, demos (bouncing balls, real-time 3D), split screen games (from tron to a acing game), they rewrote all the graphic libs of the calculator (which are now part of the HP 49 ROM). Hardware stuff like radio cards (good to cheat in large class rooms).

      --
      --I like 2 kinds of women : GIFs and JPEGs--
  285. The Best? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the ten best hacks of all time be the ones that got the most access to the most information without _anyone_ _ever_ finding out about them?

  286. Nomination: OS/2's Windows Support by smoondog · · Score: 1

    OS/2's windows support was a great hack. I know, I know they had access to the windows source. Even still, Program Manager on the OS/2 desktop was an achievement. They even made it seemless by having the mouse icons change from OS/2's to Windows when the mouse went over a windows window! OS/2 Warp could run a windows app, a dos app, or an OS/2 app from the command line.

    They had true virtual dos emulation with a config.sys and everything for these apps. Even better than NT's support now, IMO. I remember programming under OS/2, causing a segfault in the unprotected memory space of windows and getting the register dump that meant reboot for windows users everywhere. I just ctrl-esc, killed the process and started it again! Ahh, Those were the days....
    -- Moondog

  287. Best hack = The sandwich by Kierkan · · Score: 1

    I think this one represents exactly the concept of hacking.

  288. Also... by kaphka · · Score: 2

    Sorry, I forgot the most important part: I don't think the first console emulators count as great hacks because emulation in and of itself really isn't all that clever... It's just programming to conform to an interface, which is something that programmers have to do all the time anyway. It actually comes pretty naturally.

    --

    MSK

    1. Re:Also... by RoninM · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, not knowing the interface by which you are coding and how strictly it has been followed (and, in addition, what things outside of the defined interface companies have found and used) makes writing an emulator for proprietary systems an incredibly clever and non-trivial bit of work. I'm pretty sure Nintendo didn't force 3rd party software developers to conform exactly to whatever interface it decided is standard. Indeed, much can be gained from using these things in a previously unthought of manner. This means that even after reverse engineering the NES to fetch the specs and emulate its hardware, you also have to start working on its idiosyncrasies and peculiarities in interacting with the game ROMs. In retrospect, it's an easy process. When you're working blindly for the first time, it's touch-go-fail-retry until you can manage to hack together something that even begins to work vaguely like the intended platform.

      --
      If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  289. What about the people? by Phyrkrakr · · Score: 1

    If /. wants to recognize great hacks as a rebuttal to C|Net, I say go for it. But wait a minute, what about the people behind the hacks? Obviously, the Internet was one of the greatest hacks of all time, so let's give Berners-Lee the recognition he deserves. For example, Thomas Edison & co. His Menlo Park laboratory turned out a tremendous amount of inventions (read: hacks) in an extrememely short period of time. Many of his inventions were great, like the phonograph, which led the way to CDs, and the light bulb, which is obvious. If there are only 10 spots for the greatest hacks, then how can we do justice to innovators and inventors like Edison. I propose an alternate list, one for hacks, and one for the hackers themselves. The criteria for the hackers will probably be different from the criteria for the hacks, but I'll live that up to the wisdom of the /. masters to figure out. "The greatest good will come from the technical improvements tending to unification and harmony." - Nikola Tesla (1856-1943)

    --
    Psychic spies from China try to steal your mind's elation.
  290. XEROX did NOT invent the desktop metaphor!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Xerox's invention of the desktop metaphor, which was later used by Apple, Microsoft and of coursse X Windows.

    Sorry about the venting, but I get annoyed at seeing all of these myths about Apple stealing the GUI PARC being perpetuated. Pirates of Silicon Valley was about as factual as a Popeye comic...

    The desktop metaphor, in which icons on the screen represent objects such as files, folders, etc., was invented at Apple for the Macintosh and Lisa projects. The SmallTalk-based windowing systems developed at Xerox used icons to represent ACTIONS (verbs). Apple also was the first to implement pull-down menus, and the ability to resize and move windows with the mouse.

    The actual origins of the GUI date back to Jef Raskin's 1969 dissertation on Quick-Draw. Raskin arranged for Jobs to visit PARC in order to convince him to give the go-ahead for a GUI for Mac and Lisa.

    For a more in-depth exploration of the origins of the GUI, complete with email from some of the original Mac team members (originally posted in a discussion on the Semper.Fi mailing list), take a look here.

    Before anyone else brings it up, yes, the inventor of the mouse demonstrated using the mouse to cut, copy, and paste in a word processing environment in the mid '60s, but it was still a text-based system.

    1. Re:XEROX did NOT invent the desktop metaphor!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW.. Although Jef Raskin did envision some of the mat routines and abstract stuff before the folks over at PARC took those abstract theories and turned them into reality. As for the desktop thing, you are correct, that was invented at Apple. But something that few people realize is that early versions of the Lisa didn't even hav the desktop metaphor. They used this ugly filing/database interface. But if Apple is going to be mentioned for hacks the above mentioned floppy controller would be one and second would have to be the 68k emulation on the PowerPC machines. Brilliant.

  291. "Hacking" by gaddis · · Score: 1

    www.slaI say keep this computer related! Mostly anyone here would admire a computer hack vs a real physical "hack" like going to the moon and junk like that. Hack more fits todays day and age as being something done on a computer.

  292. Additional Caltech Hacks by Cedric · · Score: 1

    I had forgotten about the placard display...yeah, that was cool. In addition, the scoreboard was done in 1984 by members of my Hovse, Blacker Hovse. We have t-shirts commemorating the event :-)

    I think the greatest hack of recent memory would have to be the modification of the Hollywood sign to read "CALTECH". This not only satisfies the requirement of ingenuity, it also satisfies the requirement of being _extremely_ visible.

    We haven't had a good hack in a long time...I know some of us are trying to come up with something to do for the year 2000, but there are no definite plans as of yet. But if you see something about Caltech on New Year's Day, don't be surprised; we're just begining the new year with a good start :-)

    Nick Knouf
    nknouf@cedric.caltech.edu

  293. Greatest Hacks... by runger · · Score: 1

    Hi, How about the original Trojan Horse? After all, the trick is famous enough to have coined an english phrase... Richie

  294. You forgot by NightHwk · · Score: 1

    That at the time, the only country that produced titanium in the quantity that was needed was the soviet union, so they setup a front company somewhere to purchase the stuff. So the plane that the soviets could not stop was made from soviet materials.... =]

    --

  295. When talking about space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come noone has mentioned the R7 ?
    It's the rocket that launched the Sputnik 1,
    Gagarin and of which a modified version
    with added upper stages is still being used to launch
    the Soyuz and Progress spacecraft .

    If this doesn't qualify, I think
    the Mosquito was a pretty nice hack.

    And perl. Don;'t forget perl.

  296. "counterattack" by xcjohn · · Score: 1

    I have to point out that the CNet "Ten Tricks For Digital Pranksters" article's #4 trick Inter OS relationships involved adding a mac look to windows and windows look to mac. The suggested "counter attack" to this trick was "Download and install Linux"

    --
    ~~~ They call me Little John, but don't let the name fool you...in real life I'm very big.
  297. Wow! by Kev+Vance · · Score: 1

    That c64 rendition of Second Reality really blew my mind! And I thought 2ndreal for the pc was the best... :) Makes me want to get my C64 back out of the closet, this does...

    --
    F0 07 C7 C8
  298. Tesla's greatest hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    I vote for Tesla.

    When Tesla set the world record for man made lightning he used the PLANET EARTH as part of his tank circuit !!!!

    And he did it in 1899 to boot.

    A good description can be found at:
    http://209.207.141.249/en/0996/tesla9.htm

  299. Windows 2000! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is the most complex and advanced software product ever made by the largest and most successful software company ever to exist. It will revolutionize computing. With 50 million lines of tight, solid code, Windows 2000 will come to dominate every aspect of modern computing. From desktop systems to megaservers and centralized processors. Windows 2000 supports trillions of transactions per day flawlessly, and can easily replace your primitive and aging Unix and Novell based systems to reduce complexity and cost as well as increasing performance and maintainability. When you talk about advanced software for an advanced world, you cannot talk about anything other than the future of all computing: Windows 2000.

    Brought to you by the makers of Bob(tm) the friendly desktop! Visit us today at Microsoft!

    1. Re:Windows 2000! by xcjohn · · Score: 1

      ok, this has been bugging me for quite some time now, lets get this straight.

      Successful, by definition, is something that survives. i.e. a virus. A virus, to be a successful one, must feed off of its host without causing it to stop providing (in other words dying). I believe that Microsoft is slowly "killing" its user base by systematically warding off all compitition, no matter what they bring to the technology table. This would make Microsoft an unsuccessful buisness. Now I recognize that Microsoft has a ludicrous amount of money, but that really doesn't matter when it comes to the quality of their product, it simply means that they've, in my opinion, duped more people (including myself for a brief period).

      Now the second thing I GREATLY dissagree with you on is when you say "With 50 million lines of tight, solid code, Windows 2000 will come to dominate every aspect of modern computing". First off, complexity is NOT the way to go when it comes to quality software, simplicity is. This is where Microsoft has been going wrong for years now. They are constantly building right on top of their previous releases. What I'd personally like to see Microsoft do is take their present product and look carefully it's code, modify, tweak, improve, it, trash the krap code and replace it with good, quality, simplistic, "solid" code. Because the current "50 million" lines of code they have now is undoubtedly krap, and by no means "solid" or "tight".

      Another thing Microsoft needs to seriously contemplate doing is opening some of its source, and allow the public to look at it, work on it, and present their work back to Microsoft for evaluation. Now this isn't saying that Microsoft should throw its code to the public and let them do whatever the hell they want with it. I'm saying that Microsoft should release what they feel needs some serious work, and what they feel wouldn't hurt them as a company, and make it clear that they expect any and all revisions of that code back. Which brings me to what i feel is another problem with Microsoft, their unceasing attitude of buisness. This hurts them in some serious ways. I don't feel i can get into that right now though, but hopefully all yous slashdotters will start a FRIENDLY AND CIVIL dialog concerning what i've just presented.

      thanks for your time

      --
      ~~~ They call me Little John, but don't let the name fool you...in real life I'm very big.
    2. Re:Windows 2000! by garethwi · · Score: 1

      I think (and hope) you'll find that the poster was joking.

  300. A hack by some definitions.... by Brad_Silva · · Score: 1

    The best (funny, thought-provoking) hack that I'm aware of is the MCI hack on AT&T regarding "1-800-OPERATOR".

    Remember that? AT&T spent MILLIONS of dollars advertising their new collect calling system, then suddenly dumped it, changing the name to "1-800-CALL-ATT".

    Millions of dollars of wasted advertising money, even more millions lost to MCI's "1-800-COLLECT". Why?

    The story I heard is that some bright boy at MCI realized that some percentage of the American public is unable to spell "operator". MCI went off and got the phone number "1-800-OPERATER", routed that number to "1-800-COLLECT" and quietly stole 14% of AT&T's business.

    I vote this story as the "Best Corporate Hack of All Time" and hope the guy at MCI got a fat bonus. Not because I have anything against AT&T, just because I laughed for ten minutes when I heard about it.


    Brad Silva

    1. Re:A hack by some definitions.... by slim · · Score: 2

      .... and of course, the US phone companies I hear of (can anyone confirm it's not a myth) who charge extravagant prices, and call themselves "whatever" or "I don't care".

      "I'd like to make a long-distance call please, operator"

      "what carrier would you like, sir"

      "err, Whatever"

      "putting you through..."
      --

  301. Main thread fu (OFF-TOPIC!) by Q*bert · · Score: 2
    What browser are you using? With my browser of choice, KFM, the global Reply button for a story doesn't appear in the story header. I have to switch to Netscape to see the button. Maybe we should submit a report to our Cmdr. about this. ;)

    Vovida, OS VoIP
    Beer recipe: free! #Source
    Cold pints: $2 #Product

    1. Re:Main thread fu (OFF-TOPIC!) by King+Babar · · Score: 2
      What browser are you using? With my browser of choice, KFM, the global Reply button for a story doesn't appear in the story header. I have to switch to Netscape to see the button. Maybe we should submit a report to our Cmdr. about this. ;)

      Now, this is too weird. Either something just got fixed, or button visability depends on aspects of your customized view at the moment...or maybe I really wasn't ever looking in the right place. But the "reply" button is certainly there now, when I just looked a second ago. I think I'll personally wait before assuming it's a bug...

      Of course, now the question is whether I would have gotten my post moderated up to 5 (first time ever, although I've made better posts in the past...) if I had been able to find the button and start a new thread off of the main article.

      --

      Babar

    2. Re:Main thread fu (OFF-TOPIC!) by Hobbex · · Score: 1


      You got upped because saying "this is slightly off-topic" is close enough to "I'll probably get moderated down for this".

      (No I won't stop complaining about that)

      -
      We cannot reason ourselves out of our basic irrationality. All we can do is learn the art of being irrational in a reasonable way.

  302. Army-Navy academy rivalry -- stolen mascots by SEAL · · Score: 1
    History of the Army mascot

    During my sophomore year at the U.S. Naval Academy, we completed a pretty large "mission" if you will. In previous years, mascots had been stolen by both sides. But there was always a spare mascot to bring to the game (Navy has a goat, and Army has mules -- yeah yeah tradition I know :)).

    Anyhow, this particular year, we managed to steal ALL 4 of Army's mules prior to the football game. This was planned out a year in advance, with the assistance of one of our company officers (he's a SEAL, in fact). The planning was needed, since the mules are kept on the USMA campus, which is, in fact, a military base.

    We had a civilian travelling on their campus as a tourist, driving a horse-carriage vehicle. At the same time, we had subdued some of their people at a gate, and replaced them with our own (in full Army uniform). This was possible mainly because we had observed the watch rotations for a long time in advance.

    Some of our other people, in a separate vehicle made their way to the mules and broke them out. They were then loaded to the carriage which drove NORTH to Albany for awhile. This was to avoid the helicopters which Army sent out to search for the carriage. The rest of us headed south, back to USNA.

    Finally we joined up with 4 mules, quite a successful rally, and the only time in the history of these two schools that ALL mascots were stolen from one side. Unfortunately some of our superiors would not allow us to shave NAVY in them before returning them for the game :-)

    Best regards,

    SEAL

  303. scratching, vinyl, navajo, mac extentions. by mcc · · Score: 2

    The entire idea of using record turntable scratching to create music is, i think, one of the greatest "hack"s of all times. of course it's not a single identafiable hack but an entire methodology of music .. but still, its pioneers need some recognition.

    The first record by the ultraindustrial group Coil, "How to destroy angels", deserves _some_ kind of recognition as a hack. I have never heard this album-- i wish i had-- but from what i've heard, it was apparently all noise-- noise so heavy that certain record players were unable to play parts of it. It also supposedly contained a grooveless song-- that is, there were no grooves to hold the needle in place, making it impossible to play as the needle just skitters across the surface. a search on Google just now turned up:
    http://www.brainwashed.com/coil/music/angels.htm l

    i'd also heard of a humor record released by Monty Python called "Matching tie and hankercheif" or something, where it actually contained two seperate concentric grooves. That is, there were two completely different recordings on one surface, and depending on which of the grooves your needle happened to fall in you'd hear something different.

    I'd also like to take this moment to give recognition to all the great useless mac extentions i was so addicted to once upon a time. This is "hacking" at its purest-- short, quick, dirty little things for a specific task with no practical value. The obvious ones are things like Zipple, which made the little apple in the apple menu be animated. But that's so _obvious_! the great ones were the truly _wierd_ ones-- Kilroy, which made the wierd bald little "kilroy is here" guy pop up over the top of the window with eyes that followed the cursor if you went a preset amount of time without clicking. "Mittens Touch Typist", which would inperceptably change random keystrokes into typos, driving you crazy. I'm trying to remember some others but failing- it was so long ago. My personal favorite in terms of sheer niftiness value though was one called "sdrowkcaB". This patched basically every routine the mac os had for displaying text in such a way that any string that a program tried to print to the screen through the toolbox was reversed before being displayed. So that the menus said "eliF tidE weiV" and so on. It worked beautifully.
    And of course there was the famous NetBunny-- you secretly installed an extention on every computer in a computer lab or office, and then those extentions would lie in wait for a particular signal from the host program. Once that signal was sent out, the energizer bunny would walk across each screen on the network one by one, in an order you set up to make it appear he was walking from screen to screen.
    And what about Cthugha? that had a DOS version did it not? the program that would turn music input from the CD into shifting shapes on the screen? the oscillator on acid?
    sorry.. i'm being overwhelmed by nostalgia here.. -_-

    i also have a program i wrote which i'm proud enough of that i'll have the egotistical audacity to mention it among these others.. it's called "recursive mirrors" and it uses a mac function called "copybits" to copy the contents of the screen into a window. Except in copying the screen it copies its own display window so you get this cool staring-into-infinity tunnel effect. Or a totally different effect depending on how you have the settings set.. i dunno. check it out if you're bored. http://home.earthlink.net/~mcclure111/prog.html

    and as long as i'm rambling.. another great hack would be the idea in WW2 on the japaneese front of using Navajo indians speaking in Navajo as the one truly unbreakable code.. the japaneese never figured it out.

    -mcc-baka
    i will show you fear in a handful of dust. --t.s.eliot

    1. Re:scratching, vinyl, navajo, mac extentions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you relize that the Navajo trick failed more then succeeded, don't you?
      example. "the airplanes are going to bomb xyz bridge"
      trans. "### airplanes ### ^^^^^ ## bomb xyz %%%%%"

    2. Re:scratching, vinyl, navajo, mac extentions. by copito · · Score: 2

      The Navajo code-talkers invented a code for words that aren't in the Navajo vocabulary. Here's a dictionary
      --

      --
      "L'IT c'est moi!"
    3. Re:scratching, vinyl, navajo, mac extentions. by slim · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine used to own the Python record (which does not mean I can remember it's name, unfortunately).

      Apparently in the 50s/60s there were moderately popular horse racing records, with several concentric spiral grooves. The idea was that you'd have a load of people 'round, everyone would bet on a horse, then depending on where the needle landed, you'd get a different horse race commentary.

      Do you understand this, youngsters? My SO's brothers (now 18 yrs old), when faced with a turntable, said "so how do you skip tracks?"...

      --

  304. C64 GEOS Copy Protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The encryption used for the old C64 GEOS
    environment has got to be the most elegant piece
    of software protection I've ever had the honour
    of cracking. The way they used that pseudo-random
    noise generator, and instruction timings to XOR-
    decrypt the code, brilliant. And a real bitch to
    actually crack. :-)

    Whoever designed that, please, get in touch with
    me...

    --Toby.
    weingart@tepid.org

  305. my favorite hack by rnd() · · Score: 1
    I'd like to vote for slashdot itself. It's a truly unique concept on the internet, and though it hasn't been around for 30 years, I'm sure it will end up being seen as highly influential to the way that humans will use the web over the next 30 years.

    (I'd vote for napster too, www.napster.com)

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  306. Bill Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Monica's hack? The best of the Century...

  307. correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mig25 was the one russians built to chase sr71, and unsuccessfully i must say. It wasn't until mig31 was deployed SR71 was continuing russia overflights. There was an incident when SR71 was locked by multiple Mig31s, that's pretty much led SR71 into retirement.

    1. Re:correction by Zorgoth · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the SR-71 was retired just before the gulf war, because the secritary of defense at the time (damned if I remember his name) had some sort of vendette against it. At least that is what I remeber from Skunk Works (the book).

      --
      -------------------------------END--COMMUNICATION- --------------------------
  308. Not so fast, my friend... by discofever · · Score: 1
    Disclaimer - I found all of this by using Google. I don't know how much of this information is rock-solid, but in the context of a Slashdot post, I think it'll work fine.

    It's still a point of contention whether or not Archimedes actually did the burning mirrors trick.

    To wit: the earliest source I've found for this information is the Book of Histories by John Tzetzes, in the 12th century. He describes the mirror as a hexagonal mirror, with six square mirrors attached to the main with hinges and leather straps. This way, the mirrors could be focused.

    Now, is this accurate? It was written much more than a millennium after the event, so it may have been legend becoming fact. He didn't have a parabola of any kind; I think Diocles was the first to come up with the parabolic mirror (one century after Archimedes), and he wrote about it in the book 'On Burning Mirrors'. I guess it's possible that, over the centuries, people got the work of Diocles and Archimedes a little mixed up (seemingly easy to do, since Diocles based his work on Archimedes). But enough speculation - I'm neither a historian nor a scholar, just a kid with too much time on his hands. So, let's hear what someone else has to say.

    The best (and only, to date) refutation of the event I've seen is by D.L. Simms, in the book 'Archimedes' weapons of war and Leonardo'. I have no idea about this guy's reputation, and I've never read the book... but going off of a second-hand source (Dr. John Leinhard at the University of Houston), here's what is said :

    'Simms thinks the story hangs on the edge of plausibility. Archimedes might just barely have known enough optics to make such a mirror. It's conceivable that he could have made it with an adjustable focal length. He might even have been able to keep a beam fixed on one spot long enough to ignite wood. But beyond all those terrible if's was the fact that the burning mirror didn't appear in the earliest accounts of the battle. The first versions tell us only that Archimedes's ingenuity had something to do with winning the battle and that fire was involved.'

    Well, there you have it. Like I said, decide for yourself whether or not to trust these sources... but it is something to think about.

    1. Re:Not so fast, my friend... by Niko. · · Score: 1

      Oh, and we're still talking about it 2200 years later. ;-)

  309. FOOF: can you elaborate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm interested.

    1. Re:FOOF: can you elaborate? by redelm · · Score: 2


      Yes. The F0 0F bug affects the Intel Pentium (mmx?) processors. It is very severe, in that a user process can execute these nominally invalid instructions, and lockup the processor.

      This wouldn't be noticed on a MS-Win9* box, because lockups happen all the time. But on a multitasking server/firewall, it's disaster.

      But how do you stop a CPU from running instructions? Well, first the FreeBSD folks then the Linux crew found ways via pagefaults etc. And the F0 0F bug has safe workarounds. It took a few days, tribute to those who hacked it out.

      So now everybody can use cheap cast-off low end Pentia for all sorts of good servers without worry. AFAIK, Microsoft has yet to fix NT. I guess they expt everyone running NT to have a P6.

      -- Robert

  310. Re:IBM PC - an Evil Hack? by eagl · · Score: 1

    Based on some of the arbitrary limits in the original x86 based pc's like 640k limit, I sorta consider much of the original PC design to be an "Evil Hack" in the spirit of Dr. Evil from the Austin Powers movies. Nobody could possibly want more than 640K memory eh? Bah. Same thing with 2-digit dates. Laziness and bit-picking to save one penny per machine, and now people are getting rich selling $90 RTC cards to people who don't even know if they need one.

    There's 2 evil hacks for ya...

  311. No its Not by cybercuzco · · Score: 1
    No, its not an urban legend, it was actually done by a couple of MIT Students. They took the birdseed, went over to the Harvard football field during thier lunchbreak and did their thing. Football game comes around and its a scene straight out of Hitchcock.

    --

  312. Er, if you're referring to PSEmuPro, that really _is_ a true emulator. While it uses a dynamic-recompiling core, it's still emulating the core R3000A, as well as the GTE and other whatnot(instead of aiming for the instructions just used by a few popular games, like UltraHLE). In fact, Tratax(the author) once said that PSEmuPro was born out of a discussion with his coworkers whether it was possible to get a good fast emulation of the R-series CPUs with an x86 processor. ;)
    Bleem may be using a slightly different way, but since they're aiming for compatibility across the board I doubt that they've gone the UltraHLE route either.
    Also, only the NES used the several-hundred memory map idea. The SNES only had one or two, and there's no indication that the 32-bit and above systems use anything similar(or if they do use such an inefficient system, it hasn't been documented).
    And finally, I think you're talking about Marat Fayzullin, although it may be contested. Marat isn't exactly a popular person in the community these days...

    --
    --
  313. ultimate hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think if how much money Windows 2000 is going to cost for a hacked program

  314. stupidest mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    others might argue that it was coming down from the trees in the first place...

  315. A truly wonderful hack by wuice · · Score: 1

    Last night, right before I went to bed, I put my glasses on the headboard so that I could find them in the morning when I woke up. This morning, when I woke up, I knew exactly where they were. Isn't that a wonderful hack?

    According to this discussion, what the hell on the planet isn't considered a "hack," except possibly for "Ugh. Winbl0wz."

  316. Re:My nomination - Perl as great Hack by jjohn · · Score: 1

    Despite protestations about awkward syntax and "unique" constructs, Perl still leads the charge in producing dynamic web content. It seems to continue to find new ecological niches to fill, including database manipulation and cross platform system administration.

    What's Perl good for? Any job in which programmer's time is more valuable than execution time.

    All this said, I can't think Perl would be included in any list of top ten hacks. Not even Larry would suggest this.

    My nomination for the GREATEST hack of them all:

    Written language.

    This more than anything has allowed humanity to improve its condition.

  317. another good Rice hack by mattorb · · Score: 2
    I can't provide more details about the Willy's statue thing beyond just hearsay, but this seemed like an appropriate place to mention a more recent stunt I quite liked.

    Every year (as probably anyone who's actually reading this knows), there's a large parade before "Beer-Bike," where all the colleges basically line up on trucks and go around the Inner Loop, dousing each other with an astonishing number of water balloons and other sundry items. Unfortunately (from my point of view, at least), a couple colleges who lie along the parade route have firehoses (or in one case, a fire truck) which they bring out every year and drench passers-by with. That's one part of the story.

    Another part: as, again, most of you probably know, all the colleges are connected by a vast system of steam tunnels underground. It has become increasingly difficult to gain access to these tunnels -- some number of years ago, the administration started installing gates periodically throughout the tunnels and securing them with big beefy locks. PLUS, most of the entryways to the tunnels are either a) manholes, which are hard to use in daylight, or b) in parts of the colleges which are very hard to get to.

    The "hack," perpetrated by a friend of mine, was just to quietly go into the tunnels the morning of Beer-Bike and lie in wait; when our group was about to pass by the waterhose-bearers, we signaled him by walkie-talkie and he shut off the water to the offending college for the few minutes it took for us to pass by. The looks of confusion from the people manning the firehose were great. After we had gone by, we signaled our comrade in the tunnels once more, so he could turn the water back on and the other floats could get happily drenched.

    This was impressive for a few different reasons. To get in the tunnels as quickly and effectively as he did, the guy who did this had basically cracked the entire lock system at Rice -- this took the better part of a year, but by measuring keys and cores and such, he was eventually able to construct a series of master keys which would open most doors on campus. He also had to get a key for the steam-tunnel locks, which was another story. Finally, he had to spend quite a while tracking down the correct valves and things in the basement -- we wanted to be quite sure we were turning off only and precisely what we needed to. All in all, a good trick. :-)

  318. But it was an MIT student, dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, regardless of whether it's an urban
    legend or a true story, don't claim that some
    Harvard student could've come up with such a
    lovely hack. -- The apocryphal or real student
    with the black-and-white shirt and the birdseed was from MIT, dammit! =)

    Real or fake, it's made its way into the official
    MIT campus tours, though they're probably
    the worst retelling of the story I've heard...

  319. hackerszy by some+obscure+prophet · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen the paperclip mentioned here. computers like the apple II and the IBM PC come and go, but paperclip technology has remained relatively constant since its invention. the social and technological ramefications of the paperclip are reconfirmed every time i get a piece of media stuck in a drive. God bless those noble lengths of folded wire.

  320. Rotary Combustion Engine by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    That wasn't a Mazda 'planned' item, from what I know of the situation...basically it's this--

    you've got _1_ major moving part. (okay, not counting valves, not counting the 3 little springy bits used to seperate the 3 chambers)

    The design simply doesn't have redundancy...
    say, with a V-6...you blow a cylinder, there's still 5 more...

    With a rotary combustion engine, there's one main part, and if it gets messed up, it either stops, or you lose 2 of the 3 chambers, which makes it functionally useless.

    Now, what I'm surprised no one ever did was to make a 'double' engine, off from each other by 60 degrees, which means there'd be 6 power strokes per rotation, rather than 3. (Mind you, a 6-cylinder standard engine gets 3, as it's a 4-stroke)

    Naturally, it also doesn't help that they get worse power per gallon, due to it behaving more like a 2-stroke engine, however, they're ideally suited to small cars, as they're signficantly lighter and smaller than other other engines.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Rotary Combustion Engine by wiedmann · · Score: 1

      Actually, the rotaries in the RX-7 are all 2-rotor models. Having said that, if an apex seal blows, those engines are still toast. All those little metal bits don't do the engine any good, and it has a tendency to seize up (been there, done that). On the prototype race cars that Mazda built, they use a 3-rotor engine.

      The real hack, though, is the emissions control junk Mazda put on RX-7's in the late 70's and early 80's in order to sell the cars in California. You've never seen so many vacuum tubes before...

  321. Instant Replay by Primis · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm, seems like over half of the posts I see are still (#1) computer-related and (#2) not necessarily something that has long-lasting social changes or anything the like.

    While many of you may scoff, the concept of Instant Replay in television sports has become one of the best-known "hacks" today. Its original purpose long forgotten, it's now used instantaneously on major televised sporting events to criticize every little right and wrong thing in a cretain play.

    IIRC, the first ever Instant Replay was used during a televised Army-Navy football game, with the intent to treat viewers simply to a second showing of a touchdown run in case they didn't catch all of it the first time. There was no slow-motion or frame-by-frame analysis -- it was simply a real-time replay of the touchdown run.

    However nowadays instant replay is such a part of sports that leagues like the NFL and NHL have had to institute rules involving instant replay. Sports fans at home even get irritated if there isn't an instant replay immediately available of a certain play.

    People like John Madden have made entire careers off running an instant replay over and over again and spouting great insight into a play such as "BOOM!" or "That had to hurt!"... and then John Madden begat Matt Millen who begat (*shudder*)...

    The ramifications of this don't just end with in-game broadcast coverage though. It spawned and encouraged the concept of TV sports highlight reels (where would ESPN be without THAT?!) and the like. How many times have we all seen the replay of Joe Theisman's career-ending injury (ow), or of Bill Buckner muffing a grab in the World Series to lose it for the Red Sox? Or of Al Michaels screaming "Do you believe in miracles!" at the 1980 Winter Olympics? Without instant replay, those all-time great sports memories wouldn't be anywhere near as burned into our minds as they are now.

    The instant replay is such a standard of modern broadcasting that maybe we take it for granted (probably most of you have no idea the organization it takes to put an instant replay on your TV screen seconds after a play is over).

    Thus, I believe that Instant Replay is one of the Top Hacks of our time, because for all its positive and negative effects, there's no denying the impact it has had on both sport and broadcast.

    -- Primis.

  322. Star Wars and Reagan by D3TH · · Score: 1

    The whole "we're going to shoot your missles out of the air" Star Wars project that helped bring an end to the cold war was one of the greatest hacks of all time. Reagan threw massive amounts of cash at the project and basically hastened the downfall of the soviet union. Even though there was never a working device, the soviets were convinced that there was but were unable to keep up with the breakneck speed of the spending/research. That should rank somewhere on the list.

    --
    ---
  323. The Big Dig in Boston by jjohn · · Score: 1

    For politics, getting the Feds to fork over Sagan-esque billions for a state project was stunning.

    For engineering, building a huge artery through a
    live downtown area and, in some places *next to* the existing elevated highway is amazing.

    Of course, the hack isn't done yet. :)

  324. 500th POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SUCKAZ!

  325. Best Hack by quux26 · · Score: 1

    Orson Welles' War of the World radio broadcast.

    My .02
    Quux26

    --

    My .02
    Quux26
    www.crashspace.net
  326. Wups. by quux26 · · Score: 1

    That should have read "War of the Worlds".

    My .02
    Quux26

    --

    My .02
    Quux26
    www.crashspace.net
  327. Captain Crunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't a student at Berkeley notice that a whistle sold in Capn Crunch cereal made the same tone as AT&T's access tone. Great hack...but who gets the credit? Capn Crunch or Gen Mills?

  328. Giving Microsoft Credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 neat hacks that I bet most of you youngsters won't appreciate. Microsoft - the first version of DOS that was able to address more than 640k memory, I believe through the use of HIMEM.SYS but it was oh so many years ago that I can't really remember how it got started. Then, give credit to all the people that wrote programs to deal with High and Extended Memory. QEMM springs to mind. Of course now it's obsolete, but it fits the definition of a technical hack -- a little patch that's a cool way to solve a problem that nobody else would have thought of. Microsoft again - writing a driver so the little PC speaker could be used to play WAV objects. For those of us who didn't have sound cards back then, this little hack gave us decent sound quality from a speaker that was barely designed to go beep. --dspyder

  329. And built by _slide_rule_ by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    The SR71 pre-dates most computer hacks, as the SR-71's design predates most computers...

    The expansion problems had to be completely handled by slide rules. The Blackbird was 'pre-heated' by a jet engine to get the seams to seal, before filling it with fuel.

    Another interesting fact-- by the time the SR71 was in heavy use as a spy plane, computer controls were used to insure the place was in the proper place for the photographs. The human was primarily there to land the plane.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  330. cmu's coke machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This came up at work today, irrelevant of /., and I discovered it hadn't been posted yet. This would be the fingerable coke machine at cmu that would tell you what was left in the coke machine without you even having to get up and check. (It might still be there, I haven't taken the time to look it up...) It's elegant, it's a bit amusing, and it serves a useful purpose, and pretty much by definition had to have required lots of duct-tape style solutions to get the data it needed out of the coke machine.. [Some MIT hacker I am, voting for CMU's coke machine for a top ten list of hacks...]

  331. SR-7 as the greatest hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there another plane that matches its performance? And it is 30+ years old.

  332. Tucker! by Sappho · · Score: 1

    Surely Tucker produced one of the greatest hacks of all time.

    --
    MCSEs are the stunted children of an overbearing parent; they should be pitied, not hated.
  333. Re:In that case do not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia AKM machinegun. Most of the terorists worldwide are armed by this weapon.

  334. Agree. Coke bottlecap too. by cockroach · · Score: 1

    There was something about that mission that made me feel like it was the 'peoples' mission-that it was somehow outside the 'government'. I guess it's because it work sooo well and was sooo cool. Also the guy who put the image of the Coke bottlecap into a mars landscape pic was pretty funny and got a lot of attention. Although the pic with Bigfoot was good too.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  335. The C Language... by mertner · · Score: 1
    ...is such an obvious hack. It matches the first definition of a hack,

    a quick job that produces what is needed, but not well,

    very well indeed.

    C++ is obviously a follow-up hack, as described by one of the following definitions of a hack:

    An important secondary meaning of hack is `a creative practical joke'

    The fact that both are so widely used in spite of the existence of so much better languages just reinforces the point :)

    --
    -- As long as the answer is right, who cares if the question is wrong?
  336. some theoretical physics "hacks" by ggwood · · Score: 1

    Since E.S.Raymond's definition of hack doesn't specifically mention computers, here is a list of hacks in theoretical physics (and perhaps applied math). I cannot compare these to other hacks (say, the wheel or something) in importance, but these do effect my daily life, and probably yours, too.

    In no particular order:
    - Calculus (by Newton and Leibnetz)
    - Faraday's law of induction (relates time changing magnetic fields to an induced electric field, and vica versa)
    - Maxwell relating three equations (including Faraday's law (above)), fixing a bug in Ampere's law, adding a simple fourth law and discovering that light is an electro-magnetic wave.
    - The Schrodinger equation - part of the basis for quantum mechanics. A wave equation quite similar to the relation Maxwell found for light (however it relates the time derivitive of the wave to the second space derivitive, whereas Maxwell found for light, the second time derivitive relates to the second space derivitive.)
    Of course there were many, necessairy, steps between these events, and many great 'hacks' which are far greater intellectual achievements, but which also don't impact daily life outside the physics labs (or do so in a very indirect way - i.e. if gravity was different, the orbits of planets would be unstable, planets wouldn't form, etc.)
    A couple of the inventions I would attribute to fairly direct consequences of these works would be the transistor and the (electrical) generator.
    At the time of each of these hacks, many people had the opportunity to make them. Today, to do fundamental physics research most of us need expensive equipment, software and years and years of training; so the real, exciting, frontier of physics is closed to most people, which I find sad.
    (On a side note, I recomend visiting the Michel Faraday museum in London if you get the chance. You can see the equipment he made and worked with. The surroundings look like a cross between what I would think a blacksmith and a glassblower would use. When I visited in 1994 I was the only person there at the time!)

    --
    a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
  337. Hardware Hacks by Lady+Sharrow · · Score: 1

    OK, the apollo hacks (11 & 13) without a doubt were good. but just to through a spanner in, what about the MIR space station ?. This is nearer to a true hardware hack in that non of the American investment or research was really avalible and now we have seen some of the problems starting to happen (This thing is years past its sell by date) how its been hacked to keep it together is fantastic.

  338. The Triode by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    It seems to me that the first electronic switch, the triode, invented by Lee DeForest has to be the greatest hack of all time. After the triode, all of electronics has been incremental improvements.

  339. Joey Skaggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any media prank dones by Joey Skaggs (www.joeyskaggs.com I think). Especiall Dog Meat Soup.

  340. Apple II Color Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, the video timing was a great hack, but (IMHO) it pales in comparison to the magnitude of the hack needed to generate COLOR NTSC VIDEO on the Apple ][.

    Remember, NTSC color is determined by the PHASE SHIFT of the pixel color signal relative to the colorburst reference. To do this by direct synthesis would require a minimum of a 24 MHz clock, and we all know that nothing in the Apple][ ran that fast!

    Another way is to use digital gate delays. But these can vary greatly between individual chips and certainly between production runs and vendors. Gate delays also vary with temperature, and possibly the phase of the moon or looking at them cross-eyed.

    So, how did the Woz pull it off? The Apple][ color was rock steady, and worked well even through the crummy video modulators of the day. I'd write the answer here, but as Fermat said, there just ain't enough room in the margin. It took me days of staring at the schematic to figure it out.

    The Apple][ video timing is a Greah Hack. The color generator is an Insanely Great Hack!

    1. Re:Apple II Color Video by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 2

      Wait, I'm curious now! (this is all I ask on slashdot these days ;) ) How did it work??

  341. moderate this up!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people don't realize the difficulty of this. The guys who pulled this off literally could've been thrown in jail if they didn't succeed. And yet it was a more-or-less non destructive hack.

    Color me impressed!

    - Jeff

  342. If the movie's accurate... by dpdx · · Score: 2

    the ultimate hack of all time is the recovery of Apollo 13, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, specifically Ken(?) Mattingly, astronaut.

    Considering that they had to remotely instruct the astronauts to assemble a backup air filtration system from scavenged parts, power up a damaged spaceship in exactly the right order so as to use limited battery voltage, burn thrusters at exactly the right angle and duration to reenter the Earth without skidding off the atmosphere into deep space, or burning on reentry, and recovering the astronauts in the middle of the Indian Ocean, this isn't merely a hack, it's legend.

    I'm surprised this didn't even get mention on Slashdot.
    _____

    --
    _____
    The antidote to bad speech is not censorship, but more speech.
    1. Re:If the movie's accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just did, along with a dozen other people.

  343. Great Hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First multi-player computer game. Spacewar, written at MIT in the 70's by students and played until "real" games began to appear. Two space ships which followed the laws of physics,(unlike modern games which seem to follow the laws of aerodynamics, even when there's no air), including one variation where a planet, star or other gravity source in the center affected your motion and the motion of your missiles. While the graphics were incredibly primitive, in some ways it was far more realistic than many modern games. For years system administrators removed copies while students kept making more. Could really eat up the CPU time. Yeah, yeah, I know, nobody but us old fogies remember it now.

  344. FIRE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Controlling Fire has to be number one. not only is it a great hack, it's open source!

    It wouldn't suprise me if it started as a practical joke.

    "hhm grok hate fire, me make fake fire, scare grok hehe"

  345. Coral Castle by maphew · · Score: 1

    [paraphrased]
    The Coral Castle originally called "Rock Gate Park", was built by one man, working alone. It took him 20 years to build - from 1920 to 1940. His name is Edward Leedskalnin.

    Ed was 5 feet tall and weighed 100 pounds. He worked by himself using only handtools. Each section of wall is 8 feet tall, 4 feet wide, 3 foot thick, and weighs approximately 13,000 pounds.

    When asked how he was able to move the blocks of coral, Ed would say only that he understood the laws of weight and leverage. This from a man who only had a fourth grade education."

  346. BASIC on the Altair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so now Bill Gates is a pathetic tycoon, but once him and Paul Allen were shit hot programers. The fact that they got a BASIC interpreter working on an Altair using only an emulator they wrote themselves is Microsofts greatest hack.

  347. A great hack-related yarn, about a great hacker. by OwenF · · Score: 1
    Note: I found this years ago on a BBS and have kept it around as an inspiration to myself. I claim no responsibility for having writen it.

    I first met Mel when I went to work for Royal McBee Computer Corp., a now- defunct subsidiary of the typewriter company. The firm manufactured the LGP-30, a small, cheap (by the standards of the day) drum-memory computer, and had just started to manufacture the RPC-4000, a much-improved, bigger, better, faster drum-memory computer. Cores cost too much, and weren't here to stay, anyway. (That's why you haven't heard of the company, or the computer.)

    I had been hired to write a Fortran compiler for this new marvel, and Mel was my guide to its wonders. Mel didn't approve of compilers.

    "If a program can't rewrite its own code," he asked, "what good is it?"

    Mel had written, in hexadecimal, the most popular computer program the company owned. It ran on the LGP-30 and played blackjack with potential customers at computer shows. Its effect was always dramatic. The LGP-30 booth was packed at every show, and the IBM salesmen stood around talking to each other. Whether or not this actually sold computers was a question we never discussed.

    Mel's job was to re-write the blackjack program for the RPC-4000. (Port? What does that mean?) The new computer had a one-plus-one addressing scheme, in which each machine instruction, in addition to the operation code and the address of the needed operand, had a second address that indicated where, on the revolving drum, the next instruction was located. In modern parlance, every single instruction was followed by a GO TO! Put *that* in Pascal's pipe and smoke it.

    Mel loved the RPC-4000 because he could optimize his code: that is, locate instructions on the drum so that just as one finished its job, the next would be just arriving at the read head and available for immediate execution. There was a program to do that job, an "optimizing assembler," but Mel refused to use it.

    "You never know where it's going to put things," he explained, "so you'd have to use separate constants."

    It was a long time before I understood that remark. Since Mel knew the numerical value of every operation code, and assigned his own drum addresses, every instruction he wrote could also be considered a numerical constant. He could pick up an earlier "add" instruction, say, and multiply by it, if it had the right numeric value. His code was not easy for someone else to modify.

    I compared Mel's hand-optimized programs with the same code massaged by the optimizing assembler program, and Mel's always ran faster. That was because the "top-down" method of program design hadn't been invented yet, and Mel wouldn't have used it anyway. He wrote the innermost parts of his program loops first, so they would get first choice of the optimum address locations on the drum. The optimizing assembler wasn't smart enough to do it that way.

    Mel never wrote time-delay loops, either, even when the balky Flexowriter required a delay between output characters to work right. He just located instructions on the drum so each successive one was just *past* the read head when it was needed; the drum had to execute another complete revolution to find the next instruction. He coined an unforgettable term for this procedure. Although "optimum" is an absolute term, like "unique," it became common verbal practice to make it relative: "not quite optimum" or "less optimum" or "not very optimum." Mell called the maximum time-delay locations the "most pessimum."

    After he finished the blackjack program and got it to run, ("Even the initializer is optimized," he said proudly) he got a Change Request from the sales department. The program used an elegant (optimized) random number generator to shuffle the "cards" and deal from the "deck," and some of the salesmen felt it was too fair, since sometimes the customers lost. They wanted Mel to modify the program so, at the setting of a sense switch on the console, they could change the odds and let the customer win.

    Mel balked. He felt this was patently dishonest, which it was, and that it impinged on his personal integrity as a programmer, which it did, so he refused to do it. The Head Salesman talked to Mel, as did the Big Boss and, at the boss's urging, a few Fellow Programmers. Mel finally gave in and wrote the code, but he got the test backwards, and when the sense switch was turned on, the program would cheat, winning every time. Mel was delighted with this, claiming his subconscious was uncontrollably ethical, and adamantly refused to fix it.

    After Mel had left the company for greener pastures, the Big Boss asked me to look at the code and see if I could find the test and reverse it. Somewhat reluctantly, I agreed to look. Tracking Mel's code was a real adventure.

    I have often felt that programming is an art form, whose real value can only be appreciated by another versed in the same arcane art; there are lovely gems and brilliant coups hidden from human view and admiration, sometimes forever, by the very nature of the process. You can learn a lot about an individual just by reading through his code, even in hexadecimal. Mel was, I think, an unsung genius.

    Perhaps my greatest shock came when I found an innocent loop that had no test in it. No test. *None*. Common sense said it had to be a closed loop, where the program would circle, forever, endlessly. Program control passed right through it, however, and safely out the other side. It took me two weeks to figure it out.

    The RPC-4000 computer had a really modern facility called an index register. It allowed the programmer to write a program loop that used an indexed instruction inside; each time through, the number in the index register was added to the address of that instruction, so it would refer to the next datum in a series. He had only to increment the index register each time through. Mel never used it.

    Instead, he would pull the instruction into a machine register, add one to its address, and store it back. He would then execute the modified instruction right from the register. The loop was written so this additional execution time was taken into account -- just as this instruction finished, the next one was right under the drum's read head, ready to go. But the loop had no test in it.

    The vital clue came when I noticed the index register bit, that bit that lay between the address and the operation code in the instruction word, was turned on -- yet Mel never used the index register, leaving it zero all the time. When the light went on it nearly blinded me.

    He had located the data he was working on near the top of memory -- the largest locations the instructions could address -- so after the last datum was handled, incrementing the instruction address would make it overflow. The carry would add one to the operation code, changing it to the next one in the instruction set: a jump instruction. Sure enough, the next program instruction was in address location zero, and the program went happily on its way.

    I haven't kept in touch with Mel, so I don't know if he ever gave in to the flood of change that has washed over programming techniques since those long- gone days. I like to think he didn't. In any event, I was impressed enough that I quit looking for the offending test, telling the Big Boss that I couldn't find it. He didn't seem surprised.

    When I left the company, the blackjack program would still cheat if you turned on the right sense switch, and I think that's how it should be. I didn't feel comfortable hacking up the code of a Real Programmer.

  348. Greatest hack by foeclan · · Score: 2

    I'm not remembering who owned the satellite, but a company paid to have a commercial satellite put into orbit. There was a mistake, and it ended up written off as a loss. It was in an essentially stable orbit, but the orbit it was in was useless. They took their insurance settlement, and now Lloyd's owned a satellite. Someone at NASA, with a bit of spare time, started playing with figures. They took the figures up the chain until they finally asked Lloyds if they could try something. They used some of the remaining fuel in the satellite's thrusters to knock it into orbit around the moon. As it hit apogee, they fired again, and brought it back into Earth's orbit, with a better margin of error and more fuel remaining than had originally been planned.

    (I've heard this one a number of times. If someone has an URL with more info I'd appreciate it, since I'm pretty sure I'm not getting all the details).

    1. Re:Greatest hack by mmontour · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a different satellite, but the same general idea.

      [...]So NASA's engineers flew the satellite past that point five times, emitting carefully calculated but very tiny squirts of precious hydrazine on each flyby, and persuaded the nearly defunct ISEE-3 to become the vibrant and exciting ICE, the International Cometary Explorer.[...]

      Links here and here.

  349. CD-ROM Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I remember correctly, the sampling rate of the CD-Rom spec was somewhat arbitrarily determined. When engineers built the first ones, they were able to create digital video, audio annotation on videodisk and some other correction schemes because of some coincidences. (this is where i'm kinda fuzzy, but i do remember that much was made of this) Much of the digital music & video industry as we now know it owes its existence to the longevity of this hack.

  350. The Patch To The Morris Worm by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I remember getting the "We Are Under Attack" posting when the worm started flooding the world.
    The worm itself was mostly script-kiddy work - the interesting question was whether RTM expected the exponential growth to happen (in which case it was an interesting experimental hack) or whether he should have realized it would do that but didn't.


    One of the teams working to stop the worm put up a patch for the various bugs in the worm. They weren't going to post the real worm code, in case anybody else wanted to restart it or modify it, but a bug fix was still worthwhile and indicated that they understood the worm better than RTM himself did.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  351. Slashdot's Top 10 Hacks of all Time by Macavity · · Score: 1

    I think the grandaddy of all hacks must be awarded to BBN, the little think tank in Cambridge, MA. BBN invented TCP/IP, and, in 1969, built the very first Darpa-net using this protocol. All the other hacks: GNU, BSD, Linux, Apache, Bind, Perl, and so on, needed this primordial soup called the internet to thrive and develop.

    See
    http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/brief.html
    for a brief history of BBN's role in building the first internet.

  352. the reason we take C|Net "too seriously" by emmons · · Score: 1

    Is that C|Net appears to be serious. Both in the way they display their content and the way it is written. If the article "The Top 10 Technology Terrors" were named something along the lines of "Ten Technologies That Can Be Used Against You" it would not draw nearly as much flak.

    The proplem many computer experts have with the likes of C|Net, Ziff-Davis, CMP, etc. is that they claim to be Really Smart Computer Experts, but write as if they just figured out that "hehe, linux is cool. hehe. snort." instead of "netBSD benefits from excellent network effeciency and speed because of a well developed networking subsystem."

    -----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  353. hmm by emmons · · Score: 1

    "The hackers wrote of their own "rooting" exploits

    So does that mean that the hackers worked at M and Windholes is that way for a reason?

    ps. this is an attempt at humor, not troll. humor. laugh.

    -----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  354. TeX, of course by jmce · · Score: 1

    I would also vote for TeX... I have been using it for 10 or more years now, suggested it to a lot of (satisfied) fellow students and co-workers, ranging from computer experts to novices (saw thousands and thousands of pages being written on it), and never saw buggy behaviour (except in an old commercial DVI driver for HP LaserJets, solved by downloading the free emTeX implementation back then). No other program has been with me since IBM PC XTs and VMS machines until present-day machines with Linux and other Unix variants, since 9-pin dot matrix printers to high-resolution color devices. I still remember my amazement when I first looked at math written with TeX and printed on a 9-pin printer, when I was struggling to write some texts including very simple math on Wordstar (using classical typewriter tactics, of course). When one starts looking at the source, one notices it is more than a wonderful hack: it is truly a piece of fine art, revealing very brilliant, dedicated and educated minds (Donald Knuth and collaborators) behind it. It a pity that, even in academic environments, lots of people are still ignorant about TeX and come out of their offices frustrated about the latest MS Word crash or incompatibility. And The Texbook is a beautiful work (even if takes time to be fully appreciated), as one would expect from the scholarly source of the "Art" volumes.

    This was a fine legacy to the mankind, one of the best examples of free software and of GOOD, almost impossibly good software. As a friend of mine quotes, near a link to Don Knuth's home page:

    .. solve calciamentum de pedibus tuis locus enim in quo stas terra sancta est
    ("put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground").
  355. Phreak stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woz and blue box count? As long as the media wants true telco stuff the public can digest I think it should.

  356. Social Engineering.. by Last+Warrior · · Score: 1

    The "good times" virus hoax that went around and was recycled multiple times is a good example of a hack (prank) that will live on indefinately. It was the most overused, out of proportion social engineering project to have abused lusers.

  357. Now THAT's a hack. by leoc · · Score: 1
    Hey Chris, long time no post...

    I'd have to agree with you, those UofT engineers are a bunch of lousy do-no-gooders.

    :)

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  358. Re: The Mosquito by itachi · · Score: 2

    A cabbie from Chicago, no less. They just tacked an artificial rhinocerous onto the front of the tank, and it could just force its way through the Norman hedgerows, which is pretty impressive. I mean, a 6 foot tallpile of dirt with big hedges/trees/shrubs (old green stuff with lots of deep roots) doesn't just fall over...

    I second that, though. Fab-oo hack, esp since it was so needed. They hadn't figured that the norman hedgerows would be any different from the little ones that English fox hunters jump over, so they had nothing with which to break them down. Other methods were developed for dealign with the hedgerows, like big piles of TNT, but nothing so elegant as the Rhinos.

  359. Hacking the atom... by Pollux · · Score: 1

    Why hasn't anyone even touched on this great hack yet?

    If you follow this definition:
    "Hacking might be characterized as `an appropriate application of ingenuity'. Whether the result is a quick-and-dirty patchwork job or a carefully crafted work of art, you have to admire the cleverness that went into it."

    What better event would fit this definition of a hack than the hacking of the atom by Albert Einstein? It's an application of ingenuity, is a carefully crafted work of art (both the atom and Albert Einstein's equations), and who can't admire Einstein's ability to conquer the atom?

    Following john_gault's meaning, it fits many aspects of his description:

    A hack is often performed under a time crunch

    With Hitler on his toes and countries hearing that they could make a bomb that would leave other countries to beg for mercy, he was certainly put under pressure to research as much as possible.

    The job makes you incredibly proud of something that is often horribly ugly, and that the majority of other people view as something akin to magic (have no concept of how such job could possibly have been done or what was involved).

    Before the 1900s, there was very little knowledge of what the atom was, and most people refused to listen to scientists saying that something existed that the human eye couldn't see, but was there. If it wasn't for Einstein, no one would have been able to realize the full power they could harness with the atom.

  360. Re:Some great hacks ...(Macintosh was mainly mktg) by Howie · · Score: 1

    But all the components of the Mac you mentioned were developed at Xerox PARC during the 70s. The Mac may have been an innovative *product* but none of the technologies you mention were. Ethernet, Bitmapped Screens, Laser Printers, Personal Computers (in the modern sense) among other things all came out of PARC. Even then it was the development of other's work (Ivan Sutherland, Doug Englebart pre Xerox)...

    --
    "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
  361. Perhaps not TOP 10 but by Psinoside · · Score: 1

    hats off to all the overclockers and the companies that help the hobby (Abit especially). Dual Celerons is a wonderful hack. Kryotech also should get a mention for going the full monty and selling (not just making) the first 1ghz system by putting a refridgerator into a computer to make them go faster (a true hack if I ever saw one)

  362. Re:In that case do not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the terorists worldwide are armed by this weapon.

    Incorrect. Most of the terrorists world wide are armed with nothing more than rocks, bottles filled with gasoline, and the occasional home-made bomb.

    Speaking of which, the bottle filled with gasoline, also known as the 'Molotov Cocktail' is itself a clever hack, being originally invented by the Finns as an anti-tank weapon used to great effect against Russian tanks during the Winter War.

  363. Timex Sinclair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about when and what this little machine did.

  364. A Proposal or 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the University of New South Wales, there is a yearly event to celbrate Foundation Day. Examples of what occurs include Ring police, tell police a group of uni students dressed as council workers are blocking one of sydneys major roads. Ring council workers working on one of sydneys major roads and inform that a group of uni students dressed as police will be coming to make them stop work. Project a Pr0n movie onto the side of a building outside the movie theaters of sydney. Fake a ufo landing on Bondi Beach. Inform residents of plans to have their houses acquired by the government, come within a hairs bredth of getting a federal minister sacked. Other incidents which warrent mention are 'that guy' whose name I can't remember who claimed responsibilty for all those crop circles!! Even if he didn't do it, it was damn cool!!

  365. Re:Phreak stuff - 2600! by sixoseven · · Score: 1

    Definitely has my vote. It's a basic legend - half the stories about hacking begin with 2600.

    --
    fault-tolerant
  366. The PaulWay Top (er) Seven by PaulWay · · Score: 2
    Hmmm - I'm sure this is going to be a brain strain. Sorry, people, but I can't be bothered to hunt down the URLs for these. In no particular order:
    • The story of Mel, a Real Programmer.
      Here's a person who was programming in bubble memory, with every instruction having an implicit jump to somewhere else, and his loop apparently doesn't terminate - but it does...
    • The Voyager space probe.
      Rather than include a prewired processor, they used a generic microprocessor and included the ability to upload new software versions. In the time that the probe was flying out to Jupiter, they took the black and white image from the main camera, doubled its resolution and made it three colour. They had a hundred spare bytes of RAM at one point, and they wrote a simple object recognition algorithm that would take pictures of interesting things.
    • The Internet Worm.
      Ethical? Maybe not. Nice? Big no there. Clever? It had at least four methods of invading a system, and its only flaw was that the code that was supposed to limit its distribution didn't work. Great power-to-size ratio.
    • Public Key Encryption.
      I know it's not exactly a computer hack, but it's revolutionised the process of security and encryption. And the new matrix and polynomial curve methods that are in development will only further the ultimate end of privacy and authenticity in the digital domain.
    • PERL.
      The sheer scope of the hackery you can achieve in Perl defies description. A language where you can write entire programs without variables? Which can almost be written without use of alphabetic characters entirely? Which has singlehandedly shaped the dynamic content of the WWW? What else but PERL!
    • The login hack.
      I forget who perpetrated this, but his username/password combination would work on most UNIX systems up until around 1985 or so. The login program had extra code included to allow his username/password. To avoid that being hoed out, the C compiler had code to check if it was compiling the login program, and would include the code as necessary. To stop that being compiled out, the C compiler would check to see if it was compiling itself, and would include the code to modify itself, and the login program, if necessary. Ergo, it was impossible to remove without someone remaking a C compiler from scratch...
    • The Internet
      I know, it's very generic. But from a Military/University project, we now have the global, public, accessible network with open standards (most of the time). Every other attempt at this has failed; the one that succeeds is one not owned by some big telecommunications carrier, or, in fact, anyone :-)
    Some of these have already been mentioned. Some, like Apollo 13 or Bletchley Park, I'm not going to repeat. Some others, like the transistor and the MP3, aren't really a 'hack' even though they've made a bit impact. And go the revolving statues!
    --
    --Reason is a tool. Try to remember where you left it.--
  367. Slashdot needs DEMOSCENE category / stash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one of my favorites hacks was "Stash" and Jizz,
    from The Black Lotus (TBL) , please, download it and
    see what you can do in 64K (paper is also very good :)

    btw: i want, ehhrm,no, i _need_ to see a new category in slashdot,
    DemoScene, and demoscene related news.

  368. not a postmaster by copito · · Score: 2

    Dr. Tommy Flowers, the inventor of Colossus, did work for the Post Office, but in the Research Laboratory. This was the equivalent of working at AT&T's Bell Labs.

    This does not make Colossus any less impressive, but saying that Dr. Flowers was _just_ a post office employee is like saying Einstein was _just_ a patent clerk.
    --

    --
    "L'IT c'est moi!"
  369. Re:Duct Tape fixed my 2nd hand 3dfx card by xcene · · Score: 1
    *raises hand* :)


    When I inserted a 3dfx voodoo graphics PCI card into my K6-2 based computer, the keyboard stopped working. I tried booting up both with and without the 3d card plugged in, and it really seemed this new card was the reason for keyboard malfunction.


    I then somehow got a crazy idea that perhaps the metal edge of this expansion card was interfering with the motherboard in some obscure way.


    The fix: I put some duct tape along the metal edge of the card to "isolate" it from the rest of the computer, and you wouldn't believe it, everything worked!

    --
    -- close but no sig
  370. sendmail and uucp by jolomo · · Score: 2

    Tying together such disparate protocols as fidonet, smtp and uucp at the time was a great hack -- raw power. UUCP for such slow dial-up connections actually inciting a community via usenet and email and creating the whole idea of peer support for operating systems (Unix). Way ahead of its time.

  371. Oakridge Tn by thales · · Score: 2

    When the US was building the first Atomic bomb during WWII they had to build a city to build the bomb in. In less than a year they built the second largest city in the state, and did it under some of the heaveist security restrictions known. At the same time they were building the city they had to develop a new technology that was litterally scince fiction a couple of years earlier, and build it into the three plants that separated the U-235 from the U-238. Less than three years after the project started the first Atomic bomb was used. Regardless of what you think of the product, Oakridge was one of the greatest hacks of all time.

    --
    Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
  372. George Goble's Campfire Grill by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 1
    http://ghg.ecn.purdue.edu/

    He won the 1996 IgNobel Chemistry award for this one: he lit a campfire grill with liquid oxygen.

    I think this definitely qualifies. Original, clever, and it involves large fireballs.

    "Anything will burn if you soak it in Liquid Oxygen."

  373. Other cool football broadcasting hacks by copito · · Score: 2

    The Telestrator (although only Madden seems to be able to use it well)

    The yellow first down line.
    --

    --
    "L'IT c'est moi!"
  374. More than Perl: patch, and rn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Perl is great, but Larry's other achievements were much more significant as far as social engineering (aka culture hacking) goes.

    patch lubricated the whole process of distributed open source software development.

    rn opened up Usenet news to the average Unix user. And everything else arose from the primordial soup of Usenet news.

  375. This isn't "slashdot politically correct" but... by rhet · · Score: 1

    I know most of you are anti-Microsoft, anti-Bill Gates, etc. But Bill G. and Paul Allen did have some good hacks in their day. For starters, getting IBM to sign on by telling them MS had an OS (when in fact, they didn't) and then turning around and buying DOS for $50K and subsequently turning that into a multi-billion company wasn't a half-bad hack. Of course, my favorite MS related hack is how Bill and Paul Allen wrote BASIC for the Altaire using only an emulator (that they had coded from the tech manual with no access to the hardware) and then selling it. According to lore, when Paul Allen was on the plane to New Mexico to demo the new Microsoft BASIC on the Altaire, he realized that since they'd never actually used an Altaire they had never written the tape-loader code to actually load the BASIC tape onto the machine. He wrote that on the plane and when he programmed it in on the actual machine, it worked! The rest, as they say, is history.

  376. Eliza, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the Eliza algorithm?

    It was written more than 30 years ago, but it's still well-known. It "passes" the Turing test, inasmuch as naive users are often fooled by it... at least for a period of time.

    Although many programs have been written which attempt to do something similar, none of them are as small and elegant as Eliza.

    It was certainly no AI breakthrough -- it was just a nice little hack. :)

  377. Re:Hacking is dead? (2+2=5??) by Markusis · · Score: 1

    2+2=5 for moderately large values of 2. :o)

  378. Has not happened but simpler and possible by tilly · · Score: 2

    Animal ethologists long ago worked out how to train birds to attack specific objects. It is really simple. You take a room, put a bird on one side, and a bunch more on the other. In the first side you put something that the bird will attack (say a sleeping owl) and on the other you put something innocuous (say a brand of detergent). The bird attacks, calling out, the others hear the first bird, come to the conclusion that it is the innocuous object and voila! They are trained!

    I periodically think that someone should train starlings to attack the waving flags you see on fancy limos, and turn a flock of them loose on an important parade...

    :-)

    Cheers,
    Ben

    --
    My usual seat in the cluetrain is at A HREF="http://pub4.ezboard.com/biwethey.ht
  379. Hacker: Turing by llama+hacker · · Score: 1

    One of the greatest achievements was Alan Turing's Universal Turing Machine. With out this there probably would be no computer. This is one of the greatest hacks of all time

  380. Linux! by mikejuni · · Score: 1

    Linus and Linux is surely a great hack to the Unix society. It brings Commercial Unix to us!

  381. Re: Apollo 11 by abed · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I think Sputnik would be a better
    candidate for a 'great hack' - it gave the impetus
    for the Apollo effort.

    Just my .02.

  382. Oldie but goodie by rowlingj · · Score: 1

    Probably not much appreciated outside of Australia, but I'd nominate the Blue Sky Industries version of e, grep, roff, sort which ran on CP/M on a Z-80. The programs behaved like their namesakes because we missed *nix after we left Uni, and couldn't afford the real thing. That was around 1979.

  383. Life... by Funky+Jester · · Score: 1

    Since we've gone beyond computers, I'd have to say the greatest hack of all time is life as we know it. Think of the sheer mind boggling number of things that must have happened at the same time and in exactly the right way for life to first develop from a few amino acids. Too nobody was around to document it!

  384. Consolidated Inter-Domain Routing!!!!!!! by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    1) The last-minute refit of the Lunar Lander to provide gold-foil rad shielding and those big goofy looking feet (the latter in response to ACClarke's "Fall of Moondust").
    2) CIDR. Prevented total Internet meltdown at almost the last possible second, although it could not be thoroughly tested before deployment because the Internet cannot really be simulated (it's too big, obviously).
    3) The Berkeley Internet Name Daemon. I mean, they really didn't design it the way it ended up working - "hints" anyone? BIND arrived barely in time as the old "daily NIC download" system was collapsing under its own weight.
    4) Porsche's trailing arm torsion bar suspension. A unique solution to an old problem - Porsche actually made fundamental advances in automotive design, metallurgy, and mechanical engineering simultaneously. All high-performance cars and most tanks use the trailing arm today.
    5) Telsa's universal brushless AC motor. Revolutionized the fledgling electrical industry and earned the undying hatred of Edison.
    6) The Subroc missile - a modern sub-fired rocket that fires out of the same tubes as a WW2-style Mk48 torpedo.
    7) Ethernet. Obviously.
    8) The Vauban star fort. Look it up.
    9) LPD/LPR printing. A hideous gnarly hack that has become the basis of many a networked print system. Thank god for Red Hat's printtool.
    10) Christmas. Kill a tree for Jesus, hang a pickle on it, anything but attend that pagan Saturnalia feast where people might get naked.
    --Charlie

  385. My picks: OKUDAGRAMS, MS-DOS, etc by Surak · · Score: 2

    "Okudagrams" (look it up if not a Star Trek:TNG fan)

    PC-DOS/MS-DOS (think about it, particularly history and how Bill Gates made himself a billionaire with it)





  386. Clarification always welcome... by Niko. · · Score: 1

    That's much more than I knew about it, indeed, but I will say it was my understanding that it was the ships' rigging and sails that were ignited, fire then spreading to the deck.

    If true, though, it has the crucial hack elements of ingenuity, dire necessity, and success.

    If Archimedes and fire are all that's in first sources, perhaps Greek fire was the tool. I know even less about that except that it was waterproof and burned.

  387. TMRC by mindslip · · Score: 1

    Tech Model Railroad Club. (MIT). It's *still* chugging.

    mindslip

  388. How about the Phonograph? by BlaisePascal · · Score: 2

    Over 600 comments, and no one seems to have remembered this one...

    Picture this: Edison was a world famous inventor. But his style of inventing was very organised: Get an idea for a -profitable- invention, something with obvious market potential, then keep trying things until he found something that worked. His famous claim about "1% inspiration and 99% persperation" was right on the money as far as he was concerned. It was known that he had spend years searching for the right filiment for his lightbulb.

    But profit was his driving force. He never invented -anything- unless he knew before he started how to make money from it. Except once...

    Edison was sitting in his lab, working on improvements to a stock ticker repeater, when he noticed that a stylus on the repeater was making recognisable sounds as the repeating disc spun around.

    So he picked up some paper, sketched a simple mechanism, and gave it to his chief machinist to build. Then continued work on the repeater.

    The machine comes back, Edison adds a sheet of tinfoil, turns a crank, and shouts into it. On the second sheet of tinfoil (the first ripped before it could be played back), he had recorded the first recording of a human voice.

    The phonograph qualifies as a great hack, IMHO, because:

    1. It is simple.
    2. It has had a great impact, well remembered after the incident.
    3. It was the result of clever, innovative thinking, on the spur of the moment, rather than a long planned research project.
    4. It was done for the pleasure of doing it, rather than for a profit motive.

    3 and 4 are especially significant because it was done by someone who was known for exactly the opposite.

    Just myt thoughts.

  389. Graphics hacks? by Dwonis · · Score: 1

    http://dlitzpower.tripod.com/pokebsod/

    A little blatent self-promotion never hurt anyone.
    --------
    "I already have all the latest software."

  390. Are you all too young... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To remember Apollo 13? Or have you forgotten. Limited supplies, limited time, life or death. Now that was a great hack.

  391. Well, it is very simple, then. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    > If you'll notice, nothing in these definitions say anything
    > about a "Hack" being computer-related.
    ...
    > Adding to the ideas defined above, an
    > "All-Time Great Hack" will probably also have:
    • longevity - people should still be talking about it 20 or 30 years later, or even beyond.
    • social and/or technological impact - it should change some aspect of life, either bydirectly changing every-day life or indirectly by changing how people view the world.
    • "eleganc e" - note however, that this does not necessarily equate simplicty.
    Well, it's very simple. Orson Welles' WAR OF THE WORLDS radio skit meets those definitions of a hack:
    • More than half a century later, people still talk about it.
    • A lot of people believe in flying saucers...
    • Well, it really was all simple: a bunch of people with microphones and some everyday trinkets for sound effetcs...

    -- ----------------------------------------------
    Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!
  392. Music and recording hacks by ktakki · · Score: 1

    Woo hoo! 627th post!

    But seriously, starting with Guido d'Arezzo in the 6th century (he's responsible for the do-re-mi-... solfege syllables) and continuing on through the early polyphonists and theorists, through the era of the masters -- Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms -- and culminating with the modern and post-modern work of Debussy, Stravinsky, Schoenberg, Ives, Cage, Riley, Glass...

    Whew. Long sentence. But my point is there are hacks everywhere: Bach's eponymous fugue in Die Kunst Der Fuge (B was Bb, H was B natural back then), Schoenberg's twelve-tone system, Riley's use of aleatory elements, Cage's silence.

    And starting with Edison and Bell, the recording industry is Hackarama. Leo Fender (the "log", the original electric guitar), Les Paul (multitracking on lacquer disk fer chrissake), Bob Moog, Rupert Neve, producers like George Martin and Todd Rundgren. Pushing the envelope.

    Anyone know the story behind Ampex? IIRC it was started by G.I.s who brought captured German acetate recording tech back to the States after WWII, displacing domestic wire recorders. Built the first videotape recorders in the late '50s.

    I still use Ampex tape (456 and 499).


    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  393. Re:The login hack by goon · · Score: 2

    It was mentioned in the article above... the cc hack... I was just reading through it now...

    The actual bug I planted in the compiler would match code in the UNIX "login" command. The replacement code would miscompile the login command so that it would accept either the intended encrypted password or a particular known password. Thus if this code were installed in binary and the binary were used to compile the login command, I could log into that system as any user.

    Communication of the ACM, Vol. 27, No. 8, August 1984, pp. 761-763. Copyright © 1984, Association for Computing Machinery
    Reflections on Trusting Trust
    Ken Thompson
    http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  394. Quicktyping basic commands.... by FrankBlues · · Score: 1
    For all the C-64 hacks, this one was spiffy... Remeber that CBM basic only stored tokens and not the entire words...
    To illustrate:
    Kmart (and I always did this on the SX-64 on display):
    10 print "kmart sucks! ";
    20 goto 10
    if you were an efficient basic coder, you typed:
    10 ?"kmart sucks! ";
    20 gO 10


    Or how about the TS-1000's command per key feature... too many damn diffrent cursors in the end...

  395. The AMIGA Custom Chip Set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Note: posting here since not allowed to start a new thread! Jay Miner's AMIGA and its Custom Chip Set (back in 1985!!!) was probably one of the most beautiful pieces of hardware engineering/hacking ever done. Even today the original 1985 Amiga can do tricks that no graphics card or hardware on any machine can do (could you believe you can _trully_ mix different hardware screen resolutions on the same physical monitor screen?). Back in the days of Mac and IBM PC monocrome graphics and beeps, the Amiga offered 4096 colors and 4-channel high-quality stereo sound (up to 8 channels in software). For free they also gave you an NTSC/PAL video output with true overscan support for even higher resolutions than the standard ones. It also came (remember, 1985) with a fully 32-bit preemptive multitasking operating system, and two users interfaces (a UNIX-Shell-type command line interface, and a graphical interface like Windows/Mac/Motif). Also (1985) it had an "AutoConfig" architecture built-in into the hardware and the OS. This meant that you did practically nothing to install hardware and software, as everything was auto-recognized, installed, and configured by itself. This is the way Microsoft's Plug-and-Play was supposed to work more than 10 years later and still doesn't as we all who have a windows machine know. BTW, and you can ask any former Amiga owner about the veracity of this, with an Amiga with 1 MB of RAM (memory could be expanded to 16MB in the early models, and to 4 GB in the later ones), you could run simultanesouly a great paint program (Deluxe Paint), any of the amazing music "MOD" players, the scripting shell, the notepad, dozens of copies of the clock applet, read or write a large file to the floppy drive (just to see things moving), and NOTHING would slow down!!!!!!! (mostly because of the parallel chip architecture of the custom chip sets) AND all fit into memory efficiently!!! I have to admit the Wintel monopoly made me buy a PC many years ago, but still I have not used any Wintel PC which FEELS as fast as that machine was (I'm using a PII 450 Win98 128MB RAM machine now). For more info, go to http://www.amiga.com, and search the web for UAE (the Universal Amiga Emulator), and grab a copy of the best demo you've ever seen on a computer screen, Spaceball's "State Of The Art" (also known as SOTA in some places), you might have to tweak it a little bit to make it run at full-speed on a powerfull pentium system.

  396. The undisputed best hack of all time! IMHO by PacketOfCrisps · · Score: 1

    The wheel

  397. And reverse knocker for 1541... by FrankBlues · · Score: 1

    Slickest little basic program ever. Re-Align floppy drives that got out of alingment from constant knocking (1541's that couldn't find a track would slam their head back in the other direction)... the program just knocked the drive head the other way a little... used sparingly, about once every three months, and your drives stayed good as new!

  398. Some thoughts... by mrdisco99 · · Score: 1

    What about ARPANet? This started as a telephone connection between two DEC PDP's and eventually evolved into what we're communicating with right now.

    Then, of course, there's the tons of hacks that were put together so normal people could use it, like sendmail, BIND, etc...

    The IBM PC probably qualifies as a top hack, as well, seeing as it was just thrown together to compete with Apple, yet people are still using them (and their descendants) to this day.

    Hm... Also keep in mind Thomas Edison, one of the great hackers of all time, and his ideas of electric light and recorded sound, both of which were truly simple ideas (just about anyone can build a wax phonograph or a light bulb, given the right materials). Yet, both ideas created entire industries around them and changed the world as we know it. Notice, I didn't credit him with the motion picture, but that one probably qualifies as well.

    Also, in the tradition of Menlo Park, Xerox PARC came up with some hacks of their own, including the desktop computer before it existed in the real world, ethernet, word processing, object-oriented programming, GUI/mouse computing, and the laser printer -- the one thing Xerox actually liked.

    Of course there's countless others that are too numerous to list, but changed the course of history.

    Medeival monks invented mechanical clocks to get them up on time for their morning prayers, and our time has been divided up into tiny units ever since.

    The Wright brothers threw together some wood and fabric and made a contraption that took them off the ground for 12 seconds. Since then, the world has been constantly shrinking.

    I'm a big music buff, so I think the Minimoog synthesizer qualifies as a top hack, since it made electronic music portable and affordable, and for the first time available at musical instrument shops, where actual musicians went.

    Anyway, those are just a few suggestions for the list...


    --

    +++
    NO CARRIER

  399. The Panam� Canal by KBrown · · Score: 1

    I think transporting boats through continental land is already a good hack. Now if this way of transporting boats saves you the time to travel all around South América then it's a big hack.

    --
    --
  400. The computer virus by KBrown · · Score: 1

    They work in such a similar way to real life viruses that they deserve the right to be called a big hack

    --
    --
  401. Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're e-mail address is at woz.org! You're Woz, trying to get us all to give you props (bastard).

  402. Quake3 - CD Key authorization system shut down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As some of you may know, Quake3 is going to be in the stores in the first two weeks of December. Q3Arena is going to be outfitted with a piracy protection scheme that involves authentication on Id's server(s). Basically, everyone who plays Q3 over a TCP/IP connection (even LAN games that use TCP/IP protocol), will have to have their key authenticated everytime they wish to play. This is a powerful tool that is going to be used by Id to maximize CD sales. However, it also creates a vulnerability -- shut down Id's authentication server(s) and you shut down every Internet game of Quake3. You even shut down all LAN games of Q3 unless players use IPX protocol. There is a rumor that some "baddies" view this hack/crack as quite a prize. One thing is for sure, if someone successfully completes this hack/crack, there will be hundreds of thousands of very frustrated gamers. And, on a more ideological note, such an attack would probably kill this sort of "piracy protection".

  403. Caltech 99, MIT 0 by moller · · Score: 1

    Ok, so maybe the score wasn't exactly that, but there was the "hack" (for some reason we just call them pranks here) when some Caltech students took control of the scoreboard during the Rose Bowl (since the Rose Bowl is just down the street) and altered it to display the score

    Caltech: 99
    MIT: 16

    or something like that.

    Then there's the time that wonderful HOLLYWOOD sign on the hill was altered, using black plastic and duct tape, to say CALTECH.

    Note that when UCLA students attempted to do the same thing to the HOLLYWOOD sign, they go in deep trouble. Everyone thought the Caltech students were brilliant and funny though. :)

  404. Re:In that case do not forget by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    One can also think of the Casey Jones device, manufactured for the OSS (Office of Strategic Services, the ancestor of the CIA). It was a simple magnetic bomb, that was stuck to any railroad car by résistance fighters. It had a photocell which detonated as soon as the train car entered a tunnel, but not during the passage of day/night. To protect it from prying eyes, it bore an inscription in german saying that it was a "car movement recording device, and tampering with it was strictly verboten...

    What was nice about it is that, very often, the wrecking train that was sent to clear up the mess also had it's own Casey Jonesdevices...

    And there was also a clever railroad mine which was detonated when the engine smokestack hit a cord strung some 4 meters high between tree branches. Mine clearing crews were so busy looking down at the tracks that they simply did not think of looking up...
    -- ----------------------------------------------
    Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!

  405. What about an list of top ten anti-hacks by Zuul · · Score: 1

    This could be a really fun top 10.. antihacks like ms win 1.0

    or

    The guy who hacked a big unix server, put rc5 on it making it send the packages registered in his e-mail (duh)
    of course he was caugth. When a server runs @ 100% cpu usage all time the sysadmin is bound to notice..and he set the prog up whit his own email..an otherwize neat hack gone wrong.

  406. Samuel Morse by cebe · · Score: 1

    I hope I'm not repeating.. from what I see. no one has mentioned the all time great hack by Samuel Morse.
    He hacked electricity by being the first person to send a message through a wire of course.
    Morse wouldn't know a computer if you dropped one on him, but he would recognize the logic of ASCII... seeing as it is a descendant of his Morse Code.
    He was the first person to send data using a series of timed on-and-off pulses of electricity. Exactly how we do today, only at a much faster rate.
    We owe everything to Morse. Including a spot in the top ten.

    --
    You have paid for a total of 0 pages and so far 0 have been used up (0 today).
  407. Re:Demos rule! by Lev_Arris · · Score: 2

    Ah! Good old Second Reality, I watched it till every frame was burnt into my screen, I ripped the S3Ms out and burnt them on CD-DA to listen in the car, I downloaded the 14ndreal.zip (SQRT(2) reality) parody and the C64 version (real great one!) If there's one demo I really love, then it's Second Reality!

    Amnesia was something different: I worked for hours fiddling with my memory config, rebooting, starting Amnesia, crash, reboot, change memory config, ... Never got it to run :(

    But now for the real thing: the demo scene is just way cool, too bad it seems to be disappearing these days. Now I can't really say that I'm oldschool (my first computer was only a 286 and I never had a non-emulated C64) nor can I say that I belong to the demo scene (I'm way too dumb to code in ASM) but I can say that I'm a real fan of those guys who are. You have made these machines do things even their creators never imagined.

    Anyway, I really hope that demos will live on because if they won't I'm gonna miss them.

    Enough whining now, leave this message and go read something interesting ;)

  408. To pb: Sorry for the lost moderation point by Lev_Arris · · Score: 2

    Just wanted to excuse myself for making you lose a moderation point but when I read this: 'pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.' I just had to reply and my 'interesting' moderation point got undone

    Have a nice day nevertheless ;)

  409. Jindalee OTH Radar? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...with which a radar station in Australia knowns more about traffic at LAX than the Los Angeles control tower itself does. The Chinese followup to Jindalee featured a live track at the opening demo session which (although nobody there said as much) just happened to include a US "stealth" aircraft flying over North China. For less technical hacks I like the bloke from CalTech who went down to a nearby sportsground every day for months, wearing a white coat, to blow a whistle and throw bread to the birds. Guess what happened when the football season opened and the umpire came out to start the first game? (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  410. Lighting Cigarette with Nuclear Bomb---for real! by Chirs · · Score: 1

    This is for real, it really happened. There was a guy by the name of Theodore Taylor who designed nukes for the US government. Well, one day they were going to fire off one for testing, and he happened to notice a parabolic reflector nearby. So he propped it up facing Ground Zero and bent a piece of wire to hold a Pall Mall at the focal point. A few minutes later the bomb goes off, the sun comes down to earth, scientists watch the mushroom cloud rising, and Taylor reaches over, plucks the cigarette from the wire, and takes a puff... Chris

  411. Black body formula, Galileo, GNU emacs by alien_life_form · · Score: 1
    ...and my entries for favorite hacks are:

    1. Planck's black body radiative formula (come up with quantum mechanics in a week);
    2. Galileo dropping weights from the tower of Pisa;
    3. Gnu emacs.
    Cheers, alf
  412. Quake on ascii terminal by sti · · Score: 1

    I think that a good example of a Hack is what the one guy did to be able to play Quake on an ascii terminal! Sorry I don't remember the link.

  413. /dev/null by exalted · · Score: 1

    if anything goes wrong, divert it to /dev/null
    if it doesn't, divert it to /dev/null anyway

  414. Re:lowercase on the apple ][+ by Ed+Random · · Score: 1

    Imagine trying to sell a computer today that didn't have lowercase!

    They do. It's called WebTV ;)

    --
    -- Gxis! Ed.
  415. Gary Kildall's CP/M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not yet mentioned -- originally programmed to serve as an 8" disc controller, with ideas borrowed from DEC's RT-11 operating system. Minimalist, functional in only a few kilobytes, ubiquitous in the intel/zilog 8-bit world, and heavily influential (to the point of plagarism) in the development of MS-DOS. One of the most useful and coherent pieces of software ever written for microprocessors.

  416. Early Computer Program by Jazzy-Jeff · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing on a TV program called "Revenge of the Nerds" (UK Channel 4) a few years ago, one of the first 'computers' that had no screen or keyboard. It was essentially a box with switches and lights on the front. It could be programed by flicking the switches and would respond with combinations of lights. Somebody giving a lecture on one of these thigs wrote a program (which tood a few hours to input) which when run would play the music of "Greensleeves" as interferance on an AM radio near by. -- Genius, using the timings of loops to play a song by interferance.

    --
    Die? Thats the last thing I intend to do!
  417. What about the BBC Dustbin by garethwi · · Score: 2

    This is one I remember happening when I was much younger (probably late 70s or early 80s). The BBC has it's main offices at the BBC Television Centre in West London. The building is a huge affair (7 storeys or so) based around a circular courtyard which is approximately 100 yards in diameter. In the centre of this courtyard is a statue on a very large column (think Nelsons Column), which is almost as tall as the television centre itself.

    Anyway, one morning the staff arrived at work to find a dustbin placed on the statue, and nobody knew how it got there.

    I remember the childrens programme Blue Peter devoting a significant portion of one of its shows trying (and succeeding) to work out how it was done.

    I'm not sure if they ever found out who it was. Could anyone shed any light on this?

  418. Re: navajo by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    They also used Basque, and other Indian languages. It was something like Monday Navajo, Tuesday Basque,...
    Isn't it?
    --

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  419. THE WRIGHT BROTHERS FLYING AND THE PRINTING PRESS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FLying, powered flight, wright brothers the printing press charles babbages puter the compass eltricirty, or the actual use of

  420. $SecondReality=="master of all demos" by Inferno · · Score: 1

    Future Crew went above and beyond anything that was around at that time. Was it way back in 1993? I remember the first time I watched it on 486, then on a pentium... I almost went out and got a Gravis Ultrasound to replace my SB16, because FC recommended the Gravis. :) Those were the days when MUCH was done with VERY little. I wonder if it will run on my machine now...

    I believe it was Skaven, one of the authors of FC's Second Reality, that went on to release Catch that Goblin, a VERY well done s3m.

    It has been ages since I last went out demo searching, and I am very sorry to see the demise of hornet. Anyone happen to know where Future Crew's page is now? I believe they disbanded, but kept their presence on the 'net somewhere...

  421. I don't know who it was! by bortbox · · Score: 1

    But the guy who figured out the difference betweem a 720k disk and a 1.44 disk was the hole in the upper left hand should be giving SOMETHING. I know it saved me a budle when the differnce between the two was $5.

    Thanks Guy!
    bortbox

  422. My top ten list by cdonat · · Score: 1

    absolutely unordered:

    • The invention of the wheel
    • The invention of the Abacus
    • Little Gauss adding al the numbers fom 1 to 100 as fast as possible (summ(1-n) = n(n+1)/2)
    • Einsteins relativity theory
    • Babages Calculating machine
    • Zuses Z3 (much more elegant then the ENIAC)
    • The absolutely peaceful revolution in eastern germany
    • The telephone
    • The WWW (though it is not the most elegant solution one could think of)
    • The birth and living of Jesus Christ (I know most of you won't agree on that one)
    --
    Christof
  423. The Higgs Mechanism by ruppel · · Score: 1

    The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics in it's most simple form (without supersymmetry or strings) was formulated in the early sixties. The model alone was a substantial Hack unifying several ideas and theories that were around at the time and it has stood undisputed for decades.

    For those who haven't studied particle physics let me explain a bit. A theory in particle physics means that you define three things: The particles that are fundamental, the way they interact and the symmetries under which everything stays unchanged. The SM does all this very simply but it has a problem: none of the particles you define can have masses if you want to preserve the symmetries. This is (was) a big problem since it was known that certain symmetries existed and the existence of mass was even more evident (just drop an apple on someones head).

    The way the masses are given to the particles is to introcuce a new particle, the Higgs, which when it interacts with a particle gives it mass. This is dirty patchwork at it's best. Most particle physicists will agree that the Higgs is a pain in the a..e, it introduces a totally new _type_ of particles to the theory, it's mass is not predictable and it hasn't been found yet and perhaps will never be found. But it makes the whole theory work like an angel.


  424. Ok. I Don't Buy It by _aargh · · Score: 1

    One of the biggest hacks of all time was using an Air Force computer to house the Dead of Night chat system back in 1989. Remeber that? Probably not, because all you punk ass kids were sucking on mom's teets.

    This bullshit about a hack having to do with swift programming ability, well.. sure... but that's not what the colloquailism is and you all need to get over this meta-progammer bullshit.

    1. Re:Ok. I Don't Buy It by KimmBadd · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was out of high school 6 years in "89. Hackers are spoiled immature want-to-be criminals that only know how to have sex with themselves in a dark closet. Can you tell that I have unfortunately experienced one of these brats that need to have someone come in and smash their computers with a bat.

      --
      I have a big bag full of two cents and I'm coming your way.
  425. Hackers by KimmBadd · · Score: 1

    My dictionary says a "hack" is to cut roughly or unevenly, deal cutting blows to. This would describe an act of vandalism. So a hacker would be a person that fucks with (not even nicely) your shit. I am fairly good at breaking into places where I am not suppose to be. Also very lucky that I have not been caught. The reason I haven't been caught is because I just observe and learn from where I am, not be a total piece of shit and fuck up or change someone's very important records. It is a shame that some people (people ha) have to vindicate their own piddly ass lives by screwing with someone else. Why? Do unto others as you would have them do unto you is a way of life for me and should be taught to kids in school. That's why I also believe that what I do is NOT hacking and I need to find a name to get out of the insulting label of a hacker. Nosey? Voyeur? Trespasser? Don't brag about hacking someone's site to me either because I believe that the person hurting others needs to be hurt in the same way, so as to know what hurting someone feels like, and then stop it. I have no qualms about becoming a hacker and going to their site. Revenge is sometimes the punishment deserved. Don't even get me started about people who create a virus and then pass it to us like it was a Christmas bonus. So basically hackers are like the little kids that graffited my garage door with their gang name. So when I painted "BLOW ME" over it they stopped.

    --
    I have a big bag full of two cents and I'm coming your way.
  426. Plead, beg, grovel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After that intro it is inhuman not to tell us the details! I plead, beg and grovel for more details....

  427. C64 tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along the same lines, I came across a small program the other day. You could recreate the files from old C64 tapes by feeding the program a sampled recording of the tape! (I.e. put the tape in your stereo, sample it, and feed it to the app, and *pop* comes the data out!)

  428. AK47 hands down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    m16 isn't that great.

  429. Post-It! by JackAssPenguin · · Score: 1
    http://www.mmm.com/Post-it/artslab/sto ry.html

    This is my vote (post?) on the best hack ever:

    longevity - Its a classic that will be talked about (and used?) for many years to come.
    social/tech impact - It has both. Who has never used one of these little yellow guys? And who has never used a digital one?
    elegance - It was created by the need to "scratch an itch". It was created using glue that was apparently impossible.
    I.S.H.T.o.T-quality - Blah - this is the ultimate example of it. An idea so obvious that anyone could have thought of it and yet...

    And the main reason I choose this one is that it is also the easiest way to crack passwords (read postit stuck on monitor) so being the biggest defn. of "hack" possible.*grin*

    email: 3->e

    --
    "DNA is God's contribution to the Open Source movement"
  430. The Printing press by SimonK · · Score: 2

    Immense sociological impact, and about as subversive as you can get. Who would of thought a small thing like moveable type would make such an impression.

  431. The greatest most elegant hack of all time... by GnrcMan · · Score: 1

    has to be One-Click Ordering from Amazon.com.

    (Laugh, it's funny!)

    --GnrcMan--

  432. Re:Some great hacks ...(Macintosh was mainly mktg) by SimonK · · Score: 2

    This common story is not entirely true.

    A system very like a modern network of PCs was demonstrated in the mid-70s, before Xerox PARC was even founded by some Stanford researchers (one of whom is very famous, but whose name I have forgotten). They had a number of technologies in that system that were forgotten and have only recently reemerged - such as videoconferencing (at least in prototype).

    Similarly many of the elements of the modern GUI originated only with the Macintosh. For instance the event-based system for repainting (rather than keeping backing storage, or deactivating background apps as the Star did) was a Macintosh invention. Similarly the Star GUI was not very usable by modern standards - there was a considerable lack of graphical images. ParcPlace producst such as ObjectWorks still had this "look" until only a few years ago.

  433. S-Club 7 as the greatest hack by slim · · Score: 2

    They took the girl band/boy band formula, and bumped the body count up to 7. Hence, they could split into two groups, and overrun two kids TV shows at once.

    Genius
    --

  434. no new threads by kwakmunkee · · Score: 1

    sorry about replying off-topic, but no new threads are allowed i guess anyway, my top-ten hacks are as follows (in no particular order) open source and the idea of sharing information as it has revolutionized the entire desktop and higher-level industries. the GIMP for all the wonderful nifty stuff it does. einstein's theory on relativity. the transistor - i like having two computers (and more if i had $$) in one room! the linux kernel, it is amazing! the best programming language of all time, C! packet-switching networks, i suppose beginning with the ARPAnet in '69 GL and 3d acceleration (i wouldn't waste productivity any other way) similar ones are amazing hacks too, but admit it, HTML has completely changed the entire world with the "World-Wide-Web." the apollo series of moon-missons (especially 11 and 13), because we got just what we wanted, if not more, out of those. and 13 because it WAS amazing how we recovered it.

  435. Elite...on the BBC by TonyJohn · · Score: 1

    Yes I remember Chuckie Egg (fondly).

    Which reminds me of another: Elite. A massive game that was squeezed into just 32k - another good hack methinks.

    TJ

    --
    Owl tried to think of something wise to say, but couldn't.
  436. The Avro Arrow by Griim · · Score: 1

    This kind of reminds me of The Avro Arrow, a completely Canadian-made jet built in the late 1950's that could totally outperform anything the U.S. had built. It got shut down however, due to politics. I don't think the U.S. liked us having something that much better. :)

  437. Re: my vote is for the RobinHood/Friar Tuck hack by alight · · Score: 1

    When I saw the subject line, this is the one that immediately came to mind.

    Alan

  438. Feeding the trolls.... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
    I should know better then to do this, but...

    As the defination first was playing around, at a deep level, with your computer, I think the 'posers' who wanted to sound cool, probably were the people running scripts to break into computers.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  439. Top Ten Hacks by zebadiah · · Score: 1

    Calculus. Whether you believe that it was created by Newton or Leibowitz, calculus is a great hack. We would not have advanced very far without it, and as any 1st year science/comp sci student will tell you, a very good hack to grok.

  440. "A Necessary Evil" by Garry Wills by freeBill · · Score: 1

    In his most recent book, "A Necessary Evil, The History of American Distrust in Government," Garry Wills argues that your history teacher's idea that the Constitution was designed to produce a government which was not efficient is not, in fact, true. He suggests the authors of the Constitution had just finished in an experiment with that kind of a goal (The Articles of Confederation) and were, in fact, trying to fashion a more efficient democracy.

    Wills says the ideas we associate with the Constitution (checks-and-balances, co-equal branches, etc) actually come from the thoughts of those who argued against the Constitution. He argues the Congress was intended to be most powerful branch with the judicial and executive branches simply making things run more smoothly.

    I don't know if he's right, but this would certainly put the Bill of Rights ahead of the Constitution in the all-time hack list.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  441. Sound on the TRS80 by freeBill · · Score: 2

    This is an excellent piece, but I believe the author doesn't have it quite right about the way we used to get sound out of the TRS80. It was not the disk drive motor we used (because most TRS80s did not have a disk drive, but settled for a cassette drive).

    The way I remember doing it took advantage of a small microswitch which was intended to turn the cassette machine on and off. If you switched this microswitch on and off in patterns, you could amplifly the signal thus produced to get sound out of the machine which had no speaker.

    We also used to record sound off the cassette over files which we had created to "digitize" the audio. These files could then be used to create sounds for our TRS80 games and played over little battery-powered amplifiers we bought at Radio Shack.

    The most ingenious use of this sound was in a computer game called "Starfighter." This was published by a company which had been formed by a 14-year-old named Scott Adams (I don't think it's the Scott Adams who draws "Dilbert").

    This game contained a number of interesting hacks I had never seen before: windows in the dashboard of your spaceship, first-person perspective, sound effects which told you how fast you were going (on a machine without a speaker), an AI that not only reacted to what you did but also changed those reactions based on how dangerous the area you were in was, sprite graphics on a machine which had no sprite graphics in the operating system, and score-based advance in rank.

    The game's author was listed as H.L. "Sparky" Sparks, and I immediately thought, "Oh, no! Not another 14-year-old hacker genius." Indeed, this game would itself would qualify as one of the top 10 hacks, if it were not part of an even bigger hack: Its author was was using this hobby to help convince his boss to produce a personal computer of its own which used non-proprietary hardware so that if they balked at his ideas later on he could just go out and produce a competing model himself.

    You see, Sparks was a marketing vice president at IBM and the computer he convinced them to build was what we now know as the IBM PC. Later he did go out on his own and formed Compaq, taking with him much of the team responsible for the PC.

    That's got to be the ultimate hack: convincing IBM to finance the movement that replaced them.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  442. Rotary is not dead! by Mazzella! · · Score: 1

    The Rotary is not dead!! The new Renesis is a 1.3 Leter, 280 HP, no turbo engine. Mazda just doesn't import it into this country because everyone here wants those damn SUV's, not high-tech sports cars. Take a look at Rotary News

    The rotary has 3 moving parts, no valves, rods, pistons, rings, cams, and whatever the other 250+ parts that move in that ancient design of a piston.

    --
    1.3L, 3 moving parts, 280 HP, no Turbos, wanna Race? RotaryNe
  443. Another Nomination - Mechanical Hacks by Penguinista! · · Score: 1

    Don't know if this entirely qualifies as a 'hack' but progressing along the lines of nominating aircraft designs as "great hacks," we ought not overlook the CF105 Avro Arrow built in Canada in the 1950s. Since the program was ultimately scrapped by the Canadian government at the time (citing budget concerns) before the aircraft ever went into full-scale production, it obviously didn't become as famous as it otherwise would certainly have done, but the fact remains that it was a fantastic achievement.

    The best website concerning the Arrow is probably the Discovery Channel's Flight Deck which has a good piece on the technical aspects of the Arrow, and exn.ca has some decent stuff as well. There are several other sites which contain pix, specs & plans, noteworthy info and comparisons or narratives (mirrored), and like all obscure subjects online, it also has a Web Ring.

    The Arrow was the first aircraft to pull a 2-G turn at 50,000' without loss of speed or altitude - unusual even today. It was also an extraordinary achievement in the amount and variety of weaponry that it carried in its weapons pack, which could include not only weaponry, but also reconansance equipment, fuel, and just about anything else, most of which could be reloaded or swapped in a matter of minutes - still impressive by today's standards. Consider that an Arrow in 1959 could have flown higher at a similar speed (slightly faster, actually) than an F-14D Tomcat did 31 years later... the Arrow is a 40-year-old accomplishment that would compare remarkably well with the aircraft of today - and comparisons with aircraft of its day are in most instances almost unfair, unless you look only at a single feature.

    • The CIA's U2 spy-plane had a higher flight ceiling than the Arrow - 60,000' compared with 58,000 - and its only defence was altitude. In 1959, one of the very few things aloft that could have brought one down from its flight ceiling was an Arrow, which could bring down a target at a 70,000' altitude. The U2 was replaced by the SR-71 Blackbird (nominated elsewhere), which the Arrow predates just slightly (the Blackbird first hit the drawing board at Lougheed's SkunkWorks in September 1959, whereas the Arrow project was scrapped in February 1959; note the SR-71 has a strikingly similar cockpit configuration). For further comparison, the F14's flight ceiling is about 53,000', (the SR-71's is around 85,000' achieved in 1976).
    • The F-117A Stealth Fighter has internal weapons carriage and fly-by-wire controls: the current wave of the future. The Arrow had both in 1957.
    • The F/A-18 engines (20 years later) each produce 11,000/16,000 pounds thrust without/with afterburner; the Arrow's Iriquois engine produced 19,500/25,600 with a potential for 30,000 -- more similar to a MiG-31 or an F-14.
    • Delta-wing aircraft were revolutionary at the time - the Arrow was a tail-less delta-wing design with a "blended" cockpit (think Stealth Bomber) rather than the (at that time) conventional "bubble" cockpit with a conventional wing design.
    • Although the Arrow was intended for use as a fighter-interceptor, its armament bay was larger than a B29 Bomber's.

    The Arrow contained serveral other aviation 'firsts' and 'near-firsts' and several 'bests' and 'near-bests' - but the truly amazing thing was the way that Avro brought it all together in a single package. The designers' plans for an 'Ultimate Arrow' suggest they were thinking bigger still, despite having made history already - there is really no telling what might have evolved from the project today if had been left intact. After the project was scrapped, many of the design team from Avro went on to work on other projects, so that certain Arrow features apparently began to appear in a variety of places, including (perhaps) the Concorde, the Stealth Bomber, and at NASA, where 32 Avro engineers ended up working on Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo - including Apollo 11 (nominated elsewhere) and I believe 13 (also nominated elsewhere) and the space shuttle.

    --
    Penguinista!

    You will be un-assimilated. Resistance is just plain stupid.

    1. Re:Another Nomination - Mechanical Hacks by costas · · Score: 1

      I read the Discovery magazine articles... I had never heard of the Arrow before (and I am an aeronautical engineer ;-) but it certainly looks like an impressive machine. I dunno if it qualifies as a hack though: it had a full design cycle, whilte the SR-71 was almost thrown together in 6 months by Skunk Works and held records for four decades.

      Stories about great machines that never were get me depressed. Maybe that should be another feature... The XB-70 Valkyrie comes to mind, the (original) B-1A (not the lamer B-1B), the Russian equivalent (NATO nicknamed "BlackJack" I think) of the B-1, the Tu-144, the Tu-244, the Boeing SST... any other votes?


      engineers never lie; we just approximate the truth.

  444. Newfoundland sold to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there was an election between self-rule, joining the US or joining Canada. When self-rule got a plurality but not a majority, there was a second, unexpected election taking out the US option. Although I'm glad Canada got a chance to join Newfoundland in 1949, we essentially caught the self-rule people with their pants down, having blown their entire budgets in the first (and what they thought would be the only) election. The Canada option was mostly funded by Canadian money.

  445. Cracking of the ENIGMA during WWII by the polish. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cracking of the ENIGMA during WWII by the polish and the british.
    The ENIGMA, used by the Germans, was a good encrytion machine. Nevertheless the Polish crackid it, without the use of, then nonexisting, computers. A great hack which has saved a lot of lives.

  446. XYZZY by sohp · · Score: 1

    The original Adventure.

  447. For better or worse ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sexual reproduction

  448. Not Einstein, but Szlisard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Einstein was just asked by Szlizard and the rest of the boys to write the letter to Roosevelt - He wasn't even informed the Manhattan Project resulted until 1945 like everyone else.

    If you're going to refer to physics hacks, start with Bohrs' Copenhagen model of the hydrogen atom.

  449. Amiga Soundtrackers by Captain+Zion · · Score: 1

    Perl, vi, the zx81 and demos are really great hacks, but I nominate the Soundtracker and Protracker. They're simple, elegant and efficient hacks.

  450. SCA ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this paintball, historic battle reenactment, a martial art, or what?

    1. Re:SCA ??? by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      Half historic battle re-enactment and half martial art.

      Imagine lots of folks swinging baseball bats at each other full tilt and having a terrific time.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
  451. Top Ten Hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone seems to be pretty (surprise) anthropocentric. I don't think anything humanity has ever done counts in the top ten hacks of all time. Even just on this planet.

    Some great non-human hacks:
    1. Chlorophyll. Totally enzyme mediated, so it can be repeated endlessly. Its output is the 'energy currency' (ATP) of life. It works well, too - the best photocell's humanity can create are 3 times less efficient at light capture.
    2. Magnetic direction finding. Down is safety for bacteria, but they are so small their worlds are dominated by brownian motion, not gravity. Solution? Embed little magnets. They follow them (north in the Northern Hemisphere, south in the Southern Hemisphere), which means down (the earth's magnetic field lines point downward at most latitudes).

  452. Christianity by anonymous+cowerd · · Score: 1

    A truly inspired open source work, alas ruined at last because the GPL had not been perfected yet...

    Yours WDK - WKiernan@concentric.net

  453. and linus did that? by vipw · · Score: 2

    if you really think that it was linus' determination/skill/whatever that let you do that you are strongly misled. I'd probably be using FreeBSD or GNU/Hurd if linux wasn't the predominant PC unix. just becaus linux fills that niche well doesn't mean that other tools can't/wouldn't have grown to fill the area because of a void. There is no incentive for most people to replace linux because it works great. there is incentive to use something other than dos/windows on PCs, hence all the devel on linux/*bsd. this isn't such a hard issue to see the motives behind and attributing the free pc unix to one person who just happened to be the first to help fill the void is simply stupid.

  454. Greatest Hack. by bscanl · · Score: 1

    The Big Bang was pretty muched hacked together by God, I nominate that as best hack.

  455. Re:U.S. Constitution Flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. Constitution isn't perfect though.

    For example that silly stuff about the right to bear arms. Imagine that in a civilised society.

    The main problem with the constitution is that Americans think it is perfect. It was written by humans. It is imperfect. Just remember that.

  456. Corrections: by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    According to various papers presented at the following website (it should be noted that these papers are the digital transcriptions of original documents):

    http://www.fourmilab.ch/babbage/

    I am in error (imagine that!). It should be noted that the engine did have some form of looping capability, as well as an implementation of microcode for the mill (via something Babbage called the 'barrel' - which, I believe (based on other information I have read about other calculating engines), was simply some kind of cylindrical piece of metal with movable stubby projections (like that in a music box), used to effect other parts of the engine based on the codes given by the instruction cards)!

    In addition, his son went on to complete the mill portion of the Analytical Engine, starting prior to his fathers death, and completing the mill years later. During various expositions demonstrating the engine, it was ran through its paces to calculate multiples of PI out to 44 iterations (though it must be noted that the value given for PI was incorrect, in addition to the machine, due to various mechanical malfunctions (bugs?), miscalculating successive iterations at the 8th, 9th, 11th and 42nd (?) positions, thereby throwing successive calculation off).

    Damn, the more I learn about this engine, the more I am amazed.

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  457. The web itself by wildbill2 · · Score: 1

    The Web itself is a righteous hack, of a protocol on top of a protocol, going from "neat idea" to "every business has it" in less than five years. Two years ago, one rarely saw Web addresses in advertising. Nowdays, if you don't see a Web address in an advertisement, you tend to write the company off. Hats off to Mosaic. And to all the porn sites that are the reason the Web is so fast nowdays. And to Amazon.com, even though they've never made a profit.

  458. Sticks, Stones, Fists, and Voices vs. Guns, Armies by Qrygg · · Score: 1


    I'm going to open this little note with two words: The Police.
    While 'lawful' in the sense that they are 'the law', the police may decide that you should be detained or your house should be searched without cause. I know the common 'Believe in the System' reply to this would be that the law protects you from such and that there are things such as warrants, it should also be noted that the law can't physically protect you from itself.
    I've been in Seattle for a week now, and I've watched The Police act more like a 'military presence' than the militaries of many small countries.
    They aren't armed with just sub-lethal though, they are all sporting semi-automatic pistols with extended clips.
    Throwing rocks at them, poking them with sticks, egging them, punching them, and yelling derisive things at them will accomplish one or both of two things: Thing one, sub-lethal weapons will be used against you. Either rubber bullets, teargas, pepperspray, or truncheons. Thing two, You will feel alot better after expending the energy. (You may also be arrested but when there is a mob of people doing the same thing it won't matter. Note: I don't neccesarily advocate violence against the police or private property but one has to do what one has to do when one has to do it. I'd rather see someone hit a police officer then see a police officer hit someone.)
    Now, lets say you take your fancy 'gun' and shoot a police officer. They're going to put the formalities like sub-lethal weapons aside, and they're all going to shoot you, and you are going to die. And if you don't die, and make an escape, they will hunt you to the ends of the earth(exaggeration) or kill those who are near you who are unarmed and non-violent. Even a large group of people with your fancy guns won't stop them, because they have the National Guard to back them up, and other Government-controlled forces.
    Assuming your cause is legitimate, do you think you could muster the forces to physically neutralize all of the police officers in just one city?
    Fact: There are 45,000 police officers in New York. Even if one could muster and arm 45,000+ people to oppose them, there are always more waiting in the ranks and, chances are they'd find out beforehand. Where as, if they knew people were going to come yell at them, their response would be quite different.
    In conclusion: Your gun alone, or a few thousand guns put next to yours, won't stop the million or so guns they have.
    Disclaimer: Not that I have anything against guns, but most of the reasons for owning them just aren't cutting it, or the reasons that people defend them with. Owning a gun for home defense could save your life, it could also take your life or the life of someone near to you. Owning a gun for the purpose of defending yourself from other guns, can be plain old foolery.(This isn't the case everywhere, mind you, I can think of alot of places where guns could do some good. I'm talking about the US, and Government specifically)
    Finally: Guns are just more trouble than they're worth.

    (Postscript: If you're going to attack this rant don't attack me personally, this is a whole new paradigm for me. Attack the idea, it will help me refine it or possibly change my way of thinking. Attack me, and I will stop listening. Also, I'm in Seattle in a Journalistic capacity.)
    --Nimbus Qrygg, The One True Qrygg
    OS > Religion;

    --
    --Nimbus Qrygg, The One True Qrygg
    OS > Religion;
    Come dance with the
  459. Re:The Matrix:calculators by asciic · · Score: 1

    Cool. So the huge unused portion of our brains are filled with background daemons? Neat.

  460. Re:Sticks, Stones, Fists, and Voices vs. Guns, Arm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, I would like to thank you for responding so eloquently to my previous post. I appreciate debate, and seem to have found a forum, albeit the improper forum, to express my point of view on the subject of the right to keep and bear arms. Due to the fact that this is actually supposed to be a thread on the subject of the top ten hacks of all time, I will attempt to keep my rebuttal short. I do not feel that you fully understood my example of an illegal military presence. The Seattle Police department is not an illegal military presence. The Police are not, in fact, military at all. The Police in any jurisdiction of the United States are just plain old private U.S. citizens. I was referring to defense, by a militia, against an army placed into power after the suspension of the powers of the Constitution, or alternately, an invading army of another nation. Either one being entirely possible, however unlikely. The Second Amendment to the Constitution provides for a "...well regulated militia..." for the express purpose of defence of "the People" and it is our duty to maintain this right. If not for ourselves, then for our progeny. I want to make it clear that I do not belong to a militia, am not a member of the NRA, and I don't own any firearms. I am also not a believer in UFO's and Government conspiracies. I only believe in Our constitution, and it's amendments. If all guns were gone tomorrow, I couldn't be more happy. However, it would have to be ALL guns.