I for one enjoy this sarcastic rhetorical style. This sarcasm thing is new to me and your arguments highlight issues which matter to me. I especially like your well-designed and non-sketchy use of parentheses (when you place entire sentences in brackets, the flow of larger rhetorical structures may be disrupted). If Slashdot would impliment your sarcastic posting style, my experience here would be great. Is there any way we can make you a moderator, or better yet, an administrator on Slashdot? That would be excellent. Keep up the good work.
Mind you, the telepathy thing could be a bit hard to manage.
I for one enjoy this sarcastic rhetorical style. This sarcasm thing is new to me and your arguments highlight issues which matter to me. I especially like your well-designed and non-sketchy use of parentheses (when you place entire sentences in brackets, the flow of larger rhetorical structures may be disrupted). If Slashdot would impliment your sarcastic posting style, my experience here would be great. Is there any way we can make you a moderator, or better yet, an administrator on Slashdot? That would be excellent. Keep up the good work.
No, that's all just medieval junk science.
The correct answers were in fact "apples", "churches" and "very small rocks".
Which are all witches, as it turns out.
Hamsters don't sink apparently, but float in water.
These are some exciting results!
You learn something new every day. With results like these, how far away can self-replicating autonomous nanobots be?