I thought they meant the current Gnome interface, with the panels and menus and stuff. For some reason, my panel (I only use one) always seems to forget the positions of the tools I put in there upon a reboot, which is very annoying.
I think the lag is caused by having a large render distance. If you set it lower, the game will run smoother.
The thing that irks me is that even if you're facing an opaque wall, if the render distance isn't low, you'll still get a choppy game, which means that it's actually considering drawing blocks that it could've discarded immediately, because they're being obscured by the wall you're facing...
On second thought, maybe the "performs the upgrade" step does involve looking up the CPU's serial number, and querying the Intel server for its unique unlock code...
The FAQ gives me the impression you can buy scratch-off cards with a unique code. It says nothing about the card being tied to a particular chip, just that it's only good for one upgrade. This makes me suspect the upgrade program reads the code, contacts Intel to check if it's valid and not used yet, and if it gets the okay from the Intel server, performs the upgrade. If true, that would make it easy to crack.
The rules in TFS wouldn't affect you: they'd notice you don't put out the bins for those goods, inspect your regular trash can, find no recyclable goods, and so can't fine you for throwing them in with the rest of the trash.
Yes, but say it halves the errors it attempts to reduce, while doubling all other errors. If the motion blur is a way bigger error source than other defects, you might still come out ahead by halving it and doubling the other errors.
Then again, we don't know for sure that the relativistic model is correct at all speeds. There sure are some cosmological observations that require weird stuff like dark matter and dark energy to exist, if we assume the relativistic model is correct.
I find it funny that everybody seems to have forgotten that he was searching for UFO related material, and that he found some.
No, he said he found some, but he didn't save anything or take screenshots. This means that either he's lying or delusional, and there wasn't anything, or there was evidence, but he was stupid or autistic enough to forget that he needed to save evidence to convince others.
In conclusion, there aren't any conclusions to come to. There could be UFOs, or not. He could be asperger, or he could be lying, or stupid.
From what I read about this case, it really seems like the sysadmins should have had a clue about computer security. Empty passwords on sensitive systems connected to the internet? WTF?
Slashdot Mirror
I thought they meant the current Gnome interface, with the panels and menus and stuff. For some reason, my panel (I only use one) always seems to forget the positions of the tools I put in there upon a reboot, which is very annoying.
On the spy show Alias, a few years back, the villains from the K Directorate used KDE. Makes sense...
I think the lag is caused by having a large render distance. If you set it lower, the game will run smoother.
The thing that irks me is that even if you're facing an opaque wall, if the render distance isn't low, you'll still get a choppy game, which means that it's actually considering drawing blocks that it could've discarded immediately, because they're being obscured by the wall you're facing...
Yes, that's why he should build up and down instead. It'll also lower the distance between components, and the bus length, and thus reduce lag.
On second thought, maybe the "performs the upgrade" step does involve looking up the CPU's serial number, and querying the Intel server for its unique unlock code...
The FAQ gives me the impression you can buy scratch-off cards with a unique code. It says nothing about the card being tied to a particular chip, just that it's only good for one upgrade. This makes me suspect the upgrade program reads the code, contacts Intel to check if it's valid and not used yet, and if it gets the okay from the Intel server, performs the upgrade. If true, that would make it easy to crack.
Yeah, and they should also halt all archaeological digs. Who knows what they'll find one day? Ancient Mesopotamian weapons of mass destruction!
Oh, wait, they've already been looking for those ;-)
You were but a pawn to the Marketing Minds.
Let's burn it and say we threw it in the Mariana Trench!
The rules in TFS wouldn't affect you: they'd notice you don't put out the bins for those goods, inspect your regular trash can, find no recyclable goods, and so can't fine you for throwing them in with the rest of the trash.
So you're saying the RIAA member companies are anti free market? Communists! (Does that word still work?)
So you're one of those people who can't figure out how to send an email attachment? :-P
Yes, but say it halves the errors it attempts to reduce, while doubling all other errors. If the motion blur is a way bigger error source than other defects, you might still come out ahead by halving it and doubling the other errors.
This test you're talking about, and falsification, are the same thing.
Then again, we don't know for sure that the relativistic model is correct at all speeds. There sure are some cosmological observations that require weird stuff like dark matter and dark energy to exist, if we assume the relativistic model is correct.
If you would find a rabbit fossil in a layer with precambrian fossils, that would contradict evolution's tenets.
Wow, you are educated stupid :-)
It's all Greek to them :-)
Then how does it become authorized? Why do EULAs exist?
They made a copy of the software from disk to ram to run it. At least, that's the reason you need a licence to use software. Srsly.
Just make up whatever you want it to say. What, are they going to deny that that's what it said? Didn't think so.
FTFS:
Sounds like he watched too much Stargate, if that is possible.
<least favorite religious claim>, but he can't actually prove it, so you must have faith, or else.
No, he said he found some, but he didn't save anything or take screenshots. This means that either he's lying or delusional, and there wasn't anything, or there was evidence, but he was stupid or autistic enough to forget that he needed to save evidence to convince others.
In conclusion, there aren't any conclusions to come to. There could be UFOs, or not. He could be asperger, or he could be lying, or stupid.
From what I read about this case, it really seems like the sysadmins should have had a clue about computer security. Empty passwords on sensitive systems connected to the internet? WTF?