hell, i bet yahoo could create the database by themselves. based on the amount of KP sites that show up on their nameservers
http://rss.uribl.com/ns/yahoo_com.html
"not sponsored by any particular OS vendor"
notice the addition of "OS". meaning they were sponsored, by "someone". i wonder which side this "someone" is on.
300 random domains from the entire zone of 90 million.com's doesnt give a real good idea of what the problem here is.
if instead they would take a sample of newly registered domains, that percent would jump significatly. we use whois lookups as part of the heuristics at http://www.uribl.com/ to identify new spammer uris that show up in the query stream en masse.
domain age proves to be a big indicator of spamminess when it comes to uris in emails.
for the last 7 days, the top 10 creation dates for domain names that we have blacked
Slashdot Mirror
can you imagine tearing an ACL playing xbox...
hell, i bet yahoo could create the database by themselves. based on the amount of KP sites that show up on their nameservers http://rss.uribl.com/ns/yahoo_com.html
Hell, they could just use our data feed to identify spam domains registrered through their nic. http://rss.uribl.com/nic/GO_DADDY_SOFTWARE__INC_.h tml
"not sponsored by any particular OS vendor" notice the addition of "OS". meaning they were sponsored, by "someone". i wonder which side this "someone" is on.
300 random domains from the entire zone of 90 million .com's doesnt give a real good idea of what the problem here is.
if instead they would take a sample of newly registered domains, that percent would jump significatly. we use whois lookups as part of the heuristics at http://www.uribl.com/ to identify new spammer uris that show up in the query stream en masse.
domain age proves to be a big indicator of spamminess when it comes to uris in emails.
for the last 7 days, the top 10 creation dates for domain names that we have blacked
rank / created / black uris