The same tip also comes from the IAM. It's unfortunate no such organization exists in North America. It makes most American drivers *way* worse the average European driver.
Your classification is correct too - the reason I made my classification is that, it focuses on inside the mind of the programmer - while the imperative vs function focuses on the nature of the language itself.
It is not assembly language. It is the way we think - and in the world of computers there are 5 types of languages that will make you take on anything very easy.
A solution that works 50% of the time is pretty good.
Think of it this way - if you have many solutions that works half the time, then when you apply the solutions in series the chance of a spam getting through is exponentially reduced.
It's fundamentally different. The "K" apps are annoying because they *CHANGE* a legitimate English word, as opposed to, for example, "Winhelp", "WinAmp", which merely appends "win" in front of an intact English word.
If WinAmp were "Wmp", Winhelp were "Welp", Winmine were "Wine", Winsock were "Wock", Winspool were "Wpool" then you might have a point.
If your information is "sensitive" or "private", do yourself a favor and don't put it on the web.
Peeps nowadays...
The same tip also comes from the IAM. It's unfortunate no such organization exists in North America. It makes most American drivers *way* worse the average European driver.
Really, is 1.6 (or 1.618) much more informative than 1? If you're going to do calculations with it, use the exact value.
My real reason for complaining about decimals is that it feels wrong. 1.618 does not look like a profound number.
Your classification is correct too - the reason I made my classification is that, it focuses on inside the mind of the programmer - while the imperative vs function focuses on the nature of the language itself.
It is not assembly language. It is the way we think - and in the world of computers there are 5 types of languages that will make you take on anything very easy.
1. Procedural (Pascal/C/BASIC)
2. Object-Oriented (Eiffel/Smalltalk/Java/C++)
3. Functional (Scheme/Lisp/Logo)
4. Declarative (Prolog/Forth)
5. Assembly (x86 etc.)
LOGO, being a relative to LISP, has some really useful applications dealing with expert systems.
But again, 99.99% of the population don't have to know about it.
My ISP (Rogers, Canada) is attempting to save SCO today by directing sco.com to 127.0.0.1.
Please check with nslookup and update your host file to undo the censors if you find any.
sco.com 216.250.128.12
My ISP (Rogers, Canada) is attempting to save SCO today by directing sco.com to 127.0.0.1.
Please check with nslookup and update your host file to undo the censors if you find any.
sco.com 216.250.128.12
Thanks!
Shit. I'm an ENFJ too and I'm seeing myself in your path. Better make some changes to my lifestyle.
New form of matter.
That only lasts for some billionth of a second at nearly absolute zero temperature.
There probably is not any other form of matter at that condition.
NEXT.
How about spreading anti-spam propagandas in the captchas?
Like "Visit www.spamassassin.org"
I love to see spammers spreading advertisements about Spam Assassin on porn sites...
How about, you have to enter the solution in 20 seconds, otherwise the session expires?
I believe you can also do this with Java! It shows what a god-aweful language it is...
>So yeah, you have a few spare cycles you
>wouldn't otherwise have. But don't mistake it
>for "superiority".
Let me say it is not just "a few". How about "the vast majority".
This huge save in cycles can be is per se a "superior" quality.
As long as it is a CVT and not a traditional slushbox it should work pretty well...
Should just have pushed the clutch in and steer. You were really lucky the car straightened out when you downshift.
Why is the brake needed? You should use the CLUTCH for reversing.
A solution that works 50% of the time is pretty good.
Think of it this way - if you have many solutions that works half the time, then when you apply the solutions in series the chance of a spam getting through is exponentially reduced.
Can a single table hold at least 100GB of data, and still have fast read-write access, say, less than 30ms for both a SELECT with index and INSERT?
How much time does it take to do a backup of a 100GB database?
Failover support: when a slave takes over, how long does it take to restore the master and switch back for a 100GB database?
Are views or foreign keys with constraints supported?
Does stored procedure increase performance by precompilation?
Cool, is there any way we can get this in dict.org? ;)
I wonder what its response is. I"d be impressed if it can rebalance itself, or if it can find a posture that minimizes damage during landing.
We're talking about price of stuffs, not politics.
Even pirated movies in HK cost more than that. Believe it or not the price of movies are almost the same in Hong Kong as in US.
If you said "Pakistan" or "China" or "Thailand" or "India" that would be more in context.
If they merely appends a "k" in front of an app I don't think anyone would complain.
i.e. kConqueror is less annoying than Konqueror, kControl Center is less annoying than Kontrol Center, kContact is less annoying than Kontact.
A small "k" would be less annoying than a big "K" too. So, KDevelop is inferior to kDevelop.
It's the secret behind why so many people can live with "iPhoto", "iBook", "iMac" and "iTune".
It's fundamentally different. The "K" apps are annoying because they *CHANGE* a legitimate English word, as opposed to, for example, "Winhelp", "WinAmp", which merely appends "win" in front of an intact English word.
If WinAmp were "Wmp", Winhelp were "Welp", Winmine were "Wine", Winsock were "Wock", Winspool were "Wpool" then you might have a point.