YUP, vimeo is fast becoming the Apple of streaming video, while youtube is straightup Windows 98 First Edition, outside of an increase in file size acceptance, Youtube, licks. As far as speed, if your doing resource intensive things like any video, graphics work, Vimeo's speed shouldn't give you any more brain damage.
I don't know the model but i'm in a band with a guy who has an hp laptop that came pre installed with Vista, let's just say, the chipset does or doesn't have xp driver (i doubt it does) how does one do this, go from Vista back to XP, simply due to the fact that most programs we want to use and the soundcard we have, a nice Tascam card, I just want it to work simply, like me, can anyone provide a useful link to accommodate this request.
thanks,
Vista, i heard its not in beta yet, actually. 7?
Having seen the original on vhs when it was first released, i was too young to care about the voiceover. Watching the director's cut i thought it was cooler. Still clueless though about the whole thing, i knew the replicants were going to get killed. That's about it. It was only cause it was on directv once that i watched it again with my post post post adult brain and realized Deckard is a replicant. Basically it clicked with the first scene to M Emmet Walsh's (Raising Arizona, the terrible Mind of a Married Man from HBO as the editor). He says, your not cops, your little people, you know why your here, you know the deal." Then Deckard is all, why would they want to come back?" in reference to the other Nexians, and Walsh says again basically, thats why we got you here," cause initially, when Deckard is eating, what's his name, Olmos' character has to persistantly insist for him to come, and Deckard clearly feels he doesn't have to.
As far as is it hard to follow without the voice over, prolly no harder than reading this response. Convoluted at first, not easy, however once committed, there is a lot of sense to be had.
a collective of artists/labels create there own bit torrent site call it, Sandhead, you pay whatever amount for the year with the minimum being like twenty bucks, there are "hip" flash made graphs indicating your proportion to investment and the involved artists are the "scene" group, uploading all manner of in radiohead's case, bootlegs, photos, video clips. But also, David Lynch might be part of this collective known as Sandhead. You guys won't get this, cause your dumb, no just kidding, you're just linear.
everyone loves bill hicks, but like everything, things evolve, his opinions of the limited definition of advertising would have as well, i would imagine. advertisings online isn't like advertising offline, you can be as fair or not as possible. imagine this, a person goes into the library and xeroxes an article, (xerox wasn't always a verb like google or youtube, where a service is a pronoun)anyway, the article is 5 pages.25 cents a page, the dollar twenty five is divided between the xerox company, the library, the publisher and the author, the user is given a discount for their research effort. why can't this happen online? whats the problem, its advertising, its also a recontexualized content promotion, by default. no one intended it, therefore its not trad adverting, it post relevant contextualizing combine with creative commons to generate revenue, transitively.
i've said this will happen here on so many occassions as more and more of what i say happens, and i continue to get no points, only points to the fact that technical are nothing without creatives. sure the inertia of knowledge makes it appear like your doing something, but really, your not. My clip called Pay Per Bit or Subscription will reference Miracle On 34th St as the ultimate 21st century content management program, basic reasoning, sure no one wants to pay for anything, however frequent downloaders with brains are the only ones who can truly appreciate the occasional need to Have to pay for Some things, the content creators just have to realize this and we'll be on our to understanding downloading as nothing more than integral advertising in the form of promo material, the barter system in the form of testimonials is going to surface, Radiohead's idea for the new album won't backfire, it's just going to make being a consumer more difficult for a change and sophisticate people, who let's face it, overall, need that.
I basically said the non slashdot non computer programmer, normal uncertified web user version of this service and no one here has at this place has the social skills to appreciate it. Predictable and pathetic, but i'll persevere.
First off, obviously if intel is using the term "mash up", it's not referring to DangerMouse and The Beatles. Clearly that, if nothing is else, is linguistically, an engineerial certainty. The term mash up is essentially the word collage but dressed synactically in the parlance of our times, to quote a movie. A Multimedia collage outside of mash ups though no less known and well understood by those who used a program called, Wrapster, is the Kazaa, Morpheous, Audio Galaxy (rhap) and WinMX is the AMV, anime music video, all of this and South Park style compositing, are mash ups. Intel is basically just making a collage of cookies, which are catagorized based on popularity of query words, for web sites. Thus seemless partnered advertising, complete wiki economics. I will be posting a video collage about this whole story as expressed through multimedia video editing, which clearly is remaining no less synonymous to the letter "M" more so for Mcluhan rather than MTV, ok yea, MeTV, essentially. And to keep it going the last line before this and everything else...free.
for now though, marvel at what blank media can do
simply put, based on query the collage starts, including related or more often than not unrelated cookies influencing the collage. As the multimedia collage unfolds the GUI is three buttons, D for Data A for Audio and V for Video, the controller has these three buttons included and the user controls the edits per second, like a pitch control on a deck, as well as the transition lengths on another pitch control like device. as the collage unfolds the buttons are used to mark whatever the user finds interesting, each one nested in a subscreen around the main screen each screen per letter of alphabet. they can refine their search as they continue in it, i responded to the site where this article link takes you, maybe it will get shown maybe not. either way, this idea has been in my head for eleven years, glad to see its inevitable surfacing.
the only people who will make money from this is microsoft and that is only in the long term, just like vhs and vinyl, core users keep industry determined obsolescence from truly occurring. Difference is XP is too useful for too many people already. Most people do what they need to with it, it will affect the vocal minority of hardcore gamers, thats it. For surfing the Net, Vista isn't going to open any doors that will keep anyone hanging around. Just because it looks like an antidepressant version of an iMac doesn't mean its nearly as innovative. the people will provide the needed R and D microsoft requires for Vista to be adapted, remember there was 98, Millenium and 2000, XP seemed to take the benefit of the frequent OS ye ol soft produced during that period and SP2 allowed it to catch up to ipod HD and USB devices. Vista will do what XP can and they can then zero in on the hardware benefits that aren't so apparent after the obsolete features of XP are completely absorbed verbatim by Vista.
lawyers, they have a chance to do good and never do, copyright is the most interesting field in law, uploaders, recontextualizers, are doing promotion for that which they upload, in fact, they should get paid. Viacom knows Youtube can't control what is uploaded, and its not up to youtube to know what is and isn't copywritten. what a dumb approach when something innovative can happen you can rest assuredly it won't, suffice to say, it's entities like viacom that won't to consciously or unconsciouly keep humanity at its current adolescent level.
where, the reality of a person being either of the "threats" used to endorse this law is so rare, that, either they'll never be found out, OR, they fucking will be. no amount of technology is going to nip anything in the bud, one person is random and 99.9 percent of the time, containable. That which can't be contained is planned. My point is even if the bill is passed the snoops will misinterpret and misconstrue virtually all the information they acquire if this law is passed. Anyone remember Kurt Russell in Used Cars, where he basically has to make enough money to get a seat in Congress in the United States. I mean, anyone can be a politician and if there is anyone who shouldn't be around powerful technology, it is politicians. This law is another case of losers losing hard, I almost want this stuff to happen just to prove how stupid it is, and not to mention usefuckingless for anything other than the shits and giggles of future civil servants, the karma being created from spying is going to be awesome for those initiating it. I would imagine no one here will find any of what i've typed useful...tough and more importantly, your welcome.
you know what, the idea presented is the main thing, if that isn't appreciated the technical details like is googlevideo folding or not, which i guess they aren't are secondary, as far as this being redundant, has anyone ever proposed the idea i've proposed in the history of any slashdot "talk(type) back? i seriously doubt it, so all of you seriously need to re read it, i'll be posting a mcluhan clip in the next few days, completely on a conscious level unrelated but not atomically.
on how much you could upload, i hate these companies because IN ORDER FOR VIDEO TO BE USEFUL FOR RESEARCH MORE THAN JUST DIGGS FLASH SWARM and the millenia old established TEXT LISTS, need to be used to peruse content, I'VE SAID IT AT LEAST 20 TIMES IN DIFFERENT PLACES FOR THE LIST 11 FUCKING YEARS, WE NEED A MULTI MEDIA COLLAGE YOU CAN CONTROL THAT IS OBVIOUSLY VIDEO BASED, YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT I MEAN GOTO YOUTUBE TYPE IN WOMP2007 OR RECONTEXUALIZED CONTENT PROMOTION AND WATCH ME EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT FOR 20 MINUTES, TOO BUSY TO DO THAT, WINDOW SHOPPING FOR MEDIA THREE BUTTON CONTROL OR GUI VIDEO AUDIO DATE "V" "A" "D" RAPID MEDIA MARKS ARE CREATED, REVENUE OPPORUNITIES ABOUND, WATCH THE CLIP
as a maker of artistic video collage for ten years, i recall reading a random database magazine or was it a random oracle magazine and that is where i first heard the term meta-data. video collage based search engines will be in my prognostication THE method of choice for perusal of content, three buttons Audio Video Data to rapidly media mark the unfolding collage for the mobile device with 4g media on demand capabilites. i don't care if any of this seems unfeasible, it will be the way things are. my old youtube account before it was taken away by the Eames foundation contained many collages of the sort i mean. i will fill it up again soon enough. meta data will be the industry devoted to watching and tagging, plain and simple and human, marinate on this for a bit.
well let's just be happy that it's finally coming out so someone can make a proper version of it that isn't sony. I want USB 2.0 to drag and drop pdf and cbz files, not fucking CONNECT SPY ON YOUR SHIT AND MAKE YOU BUY THEIR CRAP BOOK SELECTION WE WANT TO BE Ibooks fuck.
if downloads are faster, uploads don't need to be, while increasing uploads would allow us to not have to increase speed, so there's that riddle. and application benefiting from faster speeds for average consumers, would only be like a Media On Demand context. in my opinion this is the only thing that would change, getting a movie in one minute or less would signigicantly, change things, getting an entire dvd collection of a show or multiple titles of anything is five minutes, this would obviously change things, but its still just media on demand, NOW! if this applys to the no doubt highly radioactive MOBile Devices, THAT and ONLY that is where the applications for faster speeds will truly be felt, right now download speeds are fast enough that the effect for downloading is like authoring a tv guide.
faster speeds in specialized areas, i'm going to assume already have faster than average download speeds.
so, yea, it would make a large difference, and that is why it won't happen til it the cost of borsht and at that point uploading speeds won't really matter but will inevitably be faster yet proportionate to what they already are.
Slashdot Mirror
YUP, vimeo is fast becoming the Apple of streaming video, while youtube is straightup Windows 98 First Edition, outside of an increase in file size acceptance, Youtube, licks. As far as speed, if your doing resource intensive things like any video, graphics work, Vimeo's speed shouldn't give you any more brain damage.
I don't know the model but i'm in a band with a guy who has an hp laptop that came pre installed with Vista, let's just say, the chipset does or doesn't have xp driver (i doubt it does) how does one do this, go from Vista back to XP, simply due to the fact that most programs we want to use and the soundcard we have, a nice Tascam card, I just want it to work simply, like me, can anyone provide a useful link to accommodate this request. thanks, Vista, i heard its not in beta yet, actually. 7?
Having seen the original on vhs when it was first released, i was too young to care about the voiceover. Watching the director's cut i thought it was cooler. Still clueless though about the whole thing, i knew the replicants were going to get killed. That's about it. It was only cause it was on directv once that i watched it again with my post post post adult brain and realized Deckard is a replicant. Basically it clicked with the first scene to M Emmet Walsh's (Raising Arizona, the terrible Mind of a Married Man from HBO as the editor). He says, your not cops, your little people, you know why your here, you know the deal." Then Deckard is all, why would they want to come back?" in reference to the other Nexians, and Walsh says again basically, thats why we got you here," cause initially, when Deckard is eating, what's his name, Olmos' character has to persistantly insist for him to come, and Deckard clearly feels he doesn't have to. As far as is it hard to follow without the voice over, prolly no harder than reading this response. Convoluted at first, not easy, however once committed, there is a lot of sense to be had.
Case closed.
a collective of artists/labels create there own bit torrent site call it, Sandhead, you pay whatever amount for the year with the minimum being like twenty bucks, there are "hip" flash made graphs indicating your proportion to investment and the involved artists are the "scene" group, uploading all manner of in radiohead's case, bootlegs, photos, video clips. But also, David Lynch might be part of this collective known as Sandhead. You guys won't get this, cause your dumb, no just kidding, you're just linear.
everyone loves bill hicks, but like everything, things evolve, his opinions of the limited definition of advertising would have as well, i would imagine. advertisings online isn't like advertising offline, you can be as fair or not as possible. imagine this, a person goes into the library and xeroxes an article, (xerox wasn't always a verb like google or youtube, where a service is a pronoun)anyway, the article is 5 pages .25 cents a page, the dollar twenty five is divided between the xerox company, the library, the publisher and the author, the user is given a discount for their research effort. why can't this happen online? whats the problem, its advertising, its also a recontexualized content promotion, by default. no one intended it, therefore its not trad adverting, it post relevant contextualizing combine with creative commons to generate revenue, transitively.
i've said this will happen here on so many occassions as more and more of what i say happens, and i continue to get no points, only points to the fact that technical are nothing without creatives. sure the inertia of knowledge makes it appear like your doing something, but really, your not. My clip called Pay Per Bit or Subscription will reference Miracle On 34th St as the ultimate 21st century content management program, basic reasoning, sure no one wants to pay for anything, however frequent downloaders with brains are the only ones who can truly appreciate the occasional need to Have to pay for Some things, the content creators just have to realize this and we'll be on our to understanding downloading as nothing more than integral advertising in the form of promo material, the barter system in the form of testimonials is going to surface, Radiohead's idea for the new album won't backfire, it's just going to make being a consumer more difficult for a change and sophisticate people, who let's face it, overall, need that.
this gets a five for insightful, paranoid insecure ignorance
I basically said the non slashdot non computer programmer, normal uncertified web user version of this service and no one here has at this place has the social skills to appreciate it. Predictable and pathetic, but i'll persevere.
First off, obviously if intel is using the term "mash up", it's not referring to DangerMouse and The Beatles. Clearly that, if nothing is else, is linguistically, an engineerial certainty. The term mash up is essentially the word collage but dressed synactically in the parlance of our times, to quote a movie. A Multimedia collage outside of mash ups though no less known and well understood by those who used a program called, Wrapster, is the Kazaa, Morpheous, Audio Galaxy (rhap) and WinMX is the AMV, anime music video, all of this and South Park style compositing, are mash ups. Intel is basically just making a collage of cookies, which are catagorized based on popularity of query words, for web sites. Thus seemless partnered advertising, complete wiki economics. I will be posting a video collage about this whole story as expressed through multimedia video editing, which clearly is remaining no less synonymous to the letter "M" more so for Mcluhan rather than MTV, ok yea, MeTV, essentially. And to keep it going the last line before this and everything else...free. for now though, marvel at what blank media can do
simply put, based on query the collage starts, including related or more often than not unrelated cookies influencing the collage. As the multimedia collage unfolds the GUI is three buttons, D for Data A for Audio and V for Video, the controller has these three buttons included and the user controls the edits per second, like a pitch control on a deck, as well as the transition lengths on another pitch control like device. as the collage unfolds the buttons are used to mark whatever the user finds interesting, each one nested in a subscreen around the main screen each screen per letter of alphabet. they can refine their search as they continue in it, i responded to the site where this article link takes you, maybe it will get shown maybe not. either way, this idea has been in my head for eleven years, glad to see its inevitable surfacing.
the only people who will make money from this is microsoft and that is only in the long term, just like vhs and vinyl, core users keep industry determined obsolescence from truly occurring. Difference is XP is too useful for too many people already. Most people do what they need to with it, it will affect the vocal minority of hardcore gamers, thats it. For surfing the Net, Vista isn't going to open any doors that will keep anyone hanging around. Just because it looks like an antidepressant version of an iMac doesn't mean its nearly as innovative. the people will provide the needed R and D microsoft requires for Vista to be adapted, remember there was 98, Millenium and 2000, XP seemed to take the benefit of the frequent OS ye ol soft produced during that period and SP2 allowed it to catch up to ipod HD and USB devices. Vista will do what XP can and they can then zero in on the hardware benefits that aren't so apparent after the obsolete features of XP are completely absorbed verbatim by Vista.
lawyers, they have a chance to do good and never do, copyright is the most interesting field in law, uploaders, recontextualizers, are doing promotion for that which they upload, in fact, they should get paid. Viacom knows Youtube can't control what is uploaded, and its not up to youtube to know what is and isn't copywritten. what a dumb approach when something innovative can happen you can rest assuredly it won't, suffice to say, it's entities like viacom that won't to consciously or unconsciouly keep humanity at its current adolescent level.
where, the reality of a person being either of the "threats" used to endorse this law is so rare, that, either they'll never be found out, OR, they fucking will be. no amount of technology is going to nip anything in the bud, one person is random and 99.9 percent of the time, containable. That which can't be contained is planned. My point is even if the bill is passed the snoops will misinterpret and misconstrue virtually all the information they acquire if this law is passed. Anyone remember Kurt Russell in Used Cars, where he basically has to make enough money to get a seat in Congress in the United States. I mean, anyone can be a politician and if there is anyone who shouldn't be around powerful technology, it is politicians. This law is another case of losers losing hard, I almost want this stuff to happen just to prove how stupid it is, and not to mention usefuckingless for anything other than the shits and giggles of future civil servants, the karma being created from spying is going to be awesome for those initiating it. I would imagine no one here will find any of what i've typed useful...tough and more importantly, your welcome.
you know what, the idea presented is the main thing, if that isn't appreciated the technical details like is googlevideo folding or not, which i guess they aren't are secondary, as far as this being redundant, has anyone ever proposed the idea i've proposed in the history of any slashdot "talk(type) back? i seriously doubt it, so all of you seriously need to re read it, i'll be posting a mcluhan clip in the next few days, completely on a conscious level unrelated but not atomically.
on how much you could upload, i hate these companies because IN ORDER FOR VIDEO TO BE USEFUL FOR RESEARCH MORE THAN JUST DIGGS FLASH SWARM and the millenia old established TEXT LISTS, need to be used to peruse content, I'VE SAID IT AT LEAST 20 TIMES IN DIFFERENT PLACES FOR THE LIST 11 FUCKING YEARS, WE NEED A MULTI MEDIA COLLAGE YOU CAN CONTROL THAT IS OBVIOUSLY VIDEO BASED, YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT I MEAN GOTO YOUTUBE TYPE IN WOMP2007 OR RECONTEXUALIZED CONTENT PROMOTION AND WATCH ME EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT FOR 20 MINUTES, TOO BUSY TO DO THAT, WINDOW SHOPPING FOR MEDIA THREE BUTTON CONTROL OR GUI VIDEO AUDIO DATE "V" "A" "D" RAPID MEDIA MARKS ARE CREATED, REVENUE OPPORUNITIES ABOUND, WATCH THE CLIP
doesn't linking to someone's content actually increase their visibility thus creating MORE potential revenue for what they have to offer?
as a maker of artistic video collage for ten years, i recall reading a random database magazine or was it a random oracle magazine and that is where i first heard the term meta-data. video collage based search engines will be in my prognostication THE method of choice for perusal of content, three buttons Audio Video Data to rapidly media mark the unfolding collage for the mobile device with 4g media on demand capabilites. i don't care if any of this seems unfeasible, it will be the way things are. my old youtube account before it was taken away by the Eames foundation contained many collages of the sort i mean. i will fill it up again soon enough. meta data will be the industry devoted to watching and tagging, plain and simple and human, marinate on this for a bit.
well let's just be happy that it's finally coming out so someone can make a proper version of it that isn't sony. I want USB 2.0 to drag and drop pdf and cbz files, not fucking CONNECT SPY ON YOUR SHIT AND MAKE YOU BUY THEIR CRAP BOOK SELECTION WE WANT TO BE Ibooks fuck.
by sucking their own genitals, then and only then can they proceed in the lawsuit
if downloads are faster, uploads don't need to be, while increasing uploads would allow us to not have to increase speed, so there's that riddle. and application benefiting from faster speeds for average consumers, would only be like a Media On Demand context. in my opinion this is the only thing that would change, getting a movie in one minute or less would signigicantly, change things, getting an entire dvd collection of a show or multiple titles of anything is five minutes, this would obviously change things, but its still just media on demand, NOW! if this applys to the no doubt highly radioactive MOBile Devices, THAT and ONLY that is where the applications for faster speeds will truly be felt, right now download speeds are fast enough that the effect for downloading is like authoring a tv guide. faster speeds in specialized areas, i'm going to assume already have faster than average download speeds. so, yea, it would make a large difference, and that is why it won't happen til it the cost of borsht and at that point uploading speeds won't really matter but will inevitably be faster yet proportionate to what they already are.