Channels are merely distributors. Wholesalers. Once (and for OTA channels still) defined by their broadcast spectrum, now some defined by their URL. OTA (ATSC) channels, limited by technological constraints to around 8 per broadcaster.
Not much has changed really, though Netflix works like your on-demand cable service, just TCP/IP instead of QAM, and you really didn't care.
And most commentators describe her email server as 'insecure' not because it *was* insecure, but because it wasn't an official Department of State server. It may have been, but I have some skill in managing email servers, not enough to trust myself installing and managing one that would be assured of attack by state-level actors, and I doubt I could get up to speed to do so in a month. I also would trust only those who had specific experience, and PRN is not one of those.
In fact, not using a DoS server is plainly proof that you don't really care about security from intruders. The Feds have resources, whether they employ them correctly or not, and have a chance of security. Very few other outfits could do so, and most if not all would be sufficiently ethical to also be useless to Mrs. Clinton in this endeavor.
I have no idea how secure her servers were, and I doubt that will ever be known with any certainty. It doesn't matter as much as some think, since she was never intending that much email would ever be shared with even legitimate agencies and requesters, witness the FOIA responses and the FBI's own efforts.
As for Trump, I think his trumporg.com mail system uses a relay, but I haven't actually kicked it around enough to be sure. It just acts like a Sendmail server
to me, at least mailhost01 does.
Piloting the lander wasn't human error, the program was leading them into rough terrain. They overshot the intended site, which Armstrong recognized early on. His switching on the docking radar was indeed an 'off - checklist' action.
But he may have been taken off flight status due to his celebrity.
40 seconds of fuel left, according to post-mission analysis.
He flew the LEM for a longer period than any simulation. The 1201/1202 errors were caused by Armstrong leaving docking radar on during descent, thinking it would save time if they had to abort. Not tested in simulation, probably because it was a checklist item.
Given the state of the art at the time, a human pilot was essential. Today we would expect an automated landing to succeed, given the massively improved capabilities.
"Let's be clear, all these fees exist as a way to hide the true cost of the service."
Not really. They exist to inflate pricing while allowing an advertised rate that doesn't actually include what should be part of the service fees. Imagine subscribing to cable TV and discovering the set top box fee they didn't tell you about, and didn't volunteer. As if you were going to pull TV shows out of the back of the modem with your little finger.
When I price service every year or so I just want a list of all the fees. The taxes are, around here, essentially identical rates, so I will pay anyways. It's ferreting out the fees that is tedious - and that's where they get another $10/month for the modem, or the box, or whatever. Even the remote.
All I can expect is a consistent disclosure. And they will try not to, since neglecting to tell me about a $10 fee makes it appear they are cheaper, and if I sign, I'm committed. Usually. And I hate changing service, so heh, I sometimes tolerate a few bucks difference.
But these fees are also often either unregulated or, again, in the dark.
CenturyLink just increased my $1.99 per month "Internet Cost Recovery Fee" to $3.99.
I grilled the rep trying to retain me about why this wasn't just a cost item, and should be part of the fee. But that's the wrong thing to do. The sales schelps are just doing a job. They neither know or care about the issue, they just want to hit their targets.
I'll let them know with my wallet next week when i cancel. And continue the round robin between the two carriers here. I'm not very interested in satellite, so two is the number.
Fortunately the Russian, Iranians, etc. have much better Internet access, and don't have to rely on a face-to-face with Pence on the tarmac, keeping the SR-71 idling while he sneaks off to negotiate a deal.
Seriously, this is absurd. Everything is a hack, right? Sure, the Trumpster has a direct line to Putin. Got it.
"When the number of those applications goes above 100,000 we can officially apply to the UN for the status of state,"
Why bother with the bottle? Just get the petition drive completed and declare a virtual nation. No contiguous land mass, no closed loop border, nothing but intent.
The UN could indeed recognize this, and so fully declare they are as much use as a handbrake on a canoe. In space.
Slashdot Mirror
This was said about the iPad.
And the Macintosh.
I kinda like higher resolution and more consistent color.
Netflix is a channel.
Hulu is a channel.
Channels are merely distributors. Wholesalers. Once (and for OTA channels still) defined by their broadcast spectrum, now some defined by their URL. OTA (ATSC) channels, limited by technological constraints to around 8 per broadcaster.
Not much has changed really, though Netflix works like your on-demand cable service, just TCP/IP instead of QAM, and you really didn't care.
I doubt they email the briefings to him.
Seriously,
And most commentators describe her email server as 'insecure' not because it *was* insecure, but because it wasn't an official Department of State server. It may have been, but I have some skill in managing email servers, not enough to trust myself installing and managing one that would be assured of attack by state-level actors, and I doubt I could get up to speed to do so in a month. I also would trust only those who had specific experience, and PRN is not one of those.
In fact, not using a DoS server is plainly proof that you don't really care about security from intruders. The Feds have resources, whether they employ them correctly or not, and have a chance of security. Very few other outfits could do so, and most if not all would be sufficiently ethical to also be useless to Mrs. Clinton in this endeavor.
I have no idea how secure her servers were, and I doubt that will ever be known with any certainty. It doesn't matter as much as some think, since she was never intending that much email would ever be shared with even legitimate agencies and requesters, witness the FOIA responses and the FBI's own efforts.
As for Trump, I think his trumporg.com mail system uses a relay, but I haven't actually kicked it around enough to be sure. It just acts like a Sendmail server
to me, at least mailhost01 does.
Piloting the lander wasn't human error, the program was leading them into rough terrain. They overshot the intended site, which Armstrong recognized early on. His switching on the docking radar was indeed an 'off - checklist' action.
But he may have been taken off flight status due to his celebrity.
40 seconds of fuel left, according to post-mission analysis.
He flew the LEM for a longer period than any simulation. The 1201/1202 errors were caused by Armstrong leaving docking radar on during descent, thinking it would save time if they had to abort. Not tested in simulation, probably because it was a checklist item.
Given the state of the art at the time, a human pilot was essential. Today we would expect an automated landing to succeed, given the massively improved capabilities.
Yeah, you may want to ask Neil Armstrong what those 1201 and 1202 alarms were all about.
And ask about those big rocks.
How about you go first with your smart idea
"Let's be clear, all these fees exist as a way to hide the true cost of the service."
Not really. They exist to inflate pricing while allowing an advertised rate that doesn't actually include what should be part of the service fees. Imagine subscribing to cable TV and discovering the set top box fee they didn't tell you about, and didn't volunteer. As if you were going to pull TV shows out of the back of the modem with your little finger.
When I price service every year or so I just want a list of all the fees. The taxes are, around here, essentially identical rates, so I will pay anyways. It's ferreting out the fees that is tedious - and that's where they get another $10/month for the modem, or the box, or whatever. Even the remote.
All I can expect is a consistent disclosure. And they will try not to, since neglecting to tell me about a $10 fee makes it appear they are cheaper, and if I sign, I'm committed. Usually. And I hate changing service, so heh, I sometimes tolerate a few bucks difference.
But these fees are also often either unregulated or, again, in the dark.
CenturyLink just increased my $1.99 per month "Internet Cost Recovery Fee" to $3.99.
I grilled the rep trying to retain me about why this wasn't just a cost item, and should be part of the fee. But that's the wrong thing to do. The sales schelps are just doing a job. They neither know or care about the issue, they just want to hit their targets.
I'll let them know with my wallet next week when i cancel. And continue the round robin between the two carriers here. I'm not very interested in satellite, so two is the number.
Fortunately the Russian, Iranians, etc. have much better Internet access, and don't have to rely on a face-to-face with Pence on the tarmac, keeping the SR-71 idling while he sneaks off to negotiate a deal.
Seriously, this is absurd. Everything is a hack, right? Sure, the Trumpster has a direct line to Putin. Got it.
"I had a girlfriend who spent every non-working minute on Facebook and not talking to me at all. Carry on a conversation? Forget it."
You may want to reexamine your definition of the word 'girlfriend'.
Assymetrical war is a concept you are not familiar with. State actors are not the only adversaries who think they make war...
And they would not, by themselves, constitute a 'government'?
Interesting theory. A nation without a government is merely a nation pretending it 'has no government'. Even voluntarism is a form of government.
Does it matter who the attacker is? Or do the results matter?
"long as it does not represent an extension of power by some part of Earth."
Ah, so 100,000 people from Earth would not 'represent an extension of power by some part of Earth.'
Ok. You go first.
"When the number of those applications goes above 100,000 we can officially apply to the UN for the status of state,"
Why bother with the bottle? Just get the petition drive completed and declare a virtual nation. No contiguous land mass, no closed loop border, nothing but intent.
The UN could indeed recognize this, and so fully declare they are as much use as a handbrake on a canoe. In space.
What could possibly go wrong?
Gawd, these people can't possibly believe their own hype, can they?
Perhaps the DNC should be doing something? Did our government offer such help to Target?
In this instance, as in some others, the roles are inappropriate.
first, this
Apparently not.
The laws regarding the handling of confidential information, and those regarding government records, were in effect long before. Those were violated.
I don't. believe the evidence has been overlooked, not by any of the responsible parties.
They just refuse to enforce the law. That's all.