You're going to create a new one of those for each transaction also, right? And if they can discern the real-world ID once, they can do it again, so IP address, any of various 'fingerprints', etc will need to be randomized or incremented.
Iterate, and you're safe, until you find our you're not.
Microsoft did this to Novell very well. And Lotus 1-2-3. They didn't have to do it to LANtastic, that died around Windows 7 days from neglect.
Admittedly, they may be out of practice, though I'm pretty sure there was some work done 'to' Quickbooks until Microsoft realized they could both never compete, and more importantly never make money in that industry...
But isn't the government's stand that this is, essentially, discovery, which can be compelled in civil cases...?
So is there criminal discovery in states or federally that would compel a defendant or suspect to surrender incriminating evidence, and how does that not run afoul of the Fifth Amendment?
Eliminate the Department of Education. I don't believe there is a constitutional basis for it. If for training the workforce, Labor can advocate and try to guide the states.
And Commerce. Trade and treaties could be dealt with at State and Customs, part of DHS.
Then reduce regulation and thereby the size of other agencies.
"ensure everyone in society is getting the benefits of productive assets, not just the owners of the productive assets."
Productive assets DO benefit everyone. Even without taxation. In the US we've chosen this form of taxation, mostly because it's the only one that can fund our excessive federal government.
All I did to collect rent and interest was take the risk of a mortgage, empty units, damage, maintenance, taxes, insurance, and fees.
In exchange for that, I get to collect rent most of the time, deal with tenants that destroy my property, answer to the police when tenants do stupid things, and assure my lenders that I'm not in need of their 'homeowner retention experts' when THEY withdraw my payment late.
Other than that, and the occasional midnight call, I just sit on my fast ass and collect rent. And work my day job.
"It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it"
I don't actually agree with this, but it's virtually impossible to distinguish between those who crave power for their own purposes and those who would seek a position of power to achieve good things.
It's always too late when you find it's the former.
Sadly the federal courts are overrun by liberal judges, and happily decide what social policy they would prefer to turn into law.
Not that truly Conservative judges would do that much better, until there is a genuine effort in Congress to enforce the Constitution and restore the rule of law. I'm not hopeful. This will take time, a process not unlike eradicating black mold.
Slashdot Mirror
By going to a better theatre. I do. Problems solved.
Freedom is a threat to 'them'.
Liberty is optional, regulated, and therefor nonexistent.
If you are not in the EU, take this as a lesson and consider how your situation could become that of someone in the EU. Then act accordingly.
It seems the key field is real-world ID.
You're going to create a new one of those for each transaction also, right? And if they can discern the real-world ID once, they can do it again, so IP address, any of various 'fingerprints', etc will need to be randomized or incremented.
Iterate, and you're safe, until you find our you're not.
Microsoft did this to Novell very well. And Lotus 1-2-3. They didn't have to do it to LANtastic, that died around Windows 7 days from neglect.
Admittedly, they may be out of practice, though I'm pretty sure there was some work done 'to' Quickbooks until Microsoft realized they could both never compete, and more importantly never make money in that industry...
But isn't the government's stand that this is, essentially, discovery, which can be compelled in civil cases...?
So is there criminal discovery in states or federally that would compel a defendant or suspect to surrender incriminating evidence, and how does that not run afoul of the Fifth Amendment?
Eliminate the Department of Education. I don't believe there is a constitutional basis for it. If for training the workforce, Labor can advocate and try to guide the states.
And Commerce. Trade and treaties could be dealt with at State and Customs, part of DHS.
Then reduce regulation and thereby the size of other agencies.
So actually doing it is wrong.
I see what you did there.
Don't you realize that a UBI is the same damned thing? Just more of it? A lot more?
And some time ago when these schools taught correctly.
"ensure everyone in society is getting the benefits of productive assets, not just the owners of the productive assets."
Productive assets DO benefit everyone. Even without taxation. In the US we've chosen this form of taxation, mostly because it's the only one that can fund our excessive federal government.
Cut government.
People can determine their own needs already.
If they CAN'T meet them, assistance to those makes sense.
If they WON'T, I'm lost as to why we should for them.
Or they are UNABLE, we must be compassionate. Of course.
All I did to collect rent and interest was take the risk of a mortgage, empty units, damage, maintenance, taxes, insurance, and fees.
In exchange for that, I get to collect rent most of the time, deal with tenants that destroy my property, answer to the police when tenants do stupid things, and assure my lenders that I'm not in need of their 'homeowner retention experts' when THEY withdraw my payment late.
Other than that, and the occasional midnight call, I just sit on my fast ass and collect rent. And work my day job.
Stupid gits. You have no idea do you?
At least get it right, k? Thanks
"It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it"
I don't actually agree with this, but it's virtually impossible to distinguish between those who crave power for their own purposes and those who would seek a position of power to achieve good things.
It's always too late when you find it's the former.
I wasn't referring to SCOTUS.
Lots of benches.
Including PC Gaming.
Ditto. Vote them out. Repeatedly. Until they do what we want.
Oh, wait...
Cling to that meme. It assures him of victory.
If you ever figure him out, you might be able to defeat him. So tell Hillary he's an idiot, and encourage her to ignore him.
File this under the heading of 'lucky businessman is successful and evil'.
Right next to 'businessmen are cleverly exploiting the system'.
So which is it? Successful businessmen are smart or lucky? Or does your opinion change depending on the name of the businessman?
Are the Clintons in business? Are they successful at it? Because they are lucky, inherited, or, um, devious? Or just good people?
Sadly the federal courts are overrun by liberal judges, and happily decide what social policy they would prefer to turn into law.
Not that truly Conservative judges would do that much better, until there is a genuine effort in Congress to enforce the Constitution and restore the rule of law. I'm not hopeful. This will take time, a process not unlike eradicating black mold.
Most Republican congresspersons are not at all conservative. Even most of those claiming to be.
Sorry, but Hillary supporters are idiots, regardless of whatever else is true. The woman is unfit to be President.
"Single payer is the sane answer for the average person."
I already have single payer healthcare in the US.
I pay my insurance premiums.
I pay the deductible.
I pay the expenses not covered.
I have not incurred expenses in excess of my payments for now almost exactly 40 years. Will be 40 years in about 2 months.
I am the single payer. And I also, via taxes and excess premiums, pay others' healthcare, which I am mostly willing to do.
Unfortunately, Republicans and Democrats wear the same stripes.
FTFY
Blockchain is transparent. Sooner or later they match your GUID to you. You are no longer hiding anything.