Time for you to move elsewhere. Freedom and liberty are not given. They are literally, literally fought for, constantly. Lead, follow, or get out of the way. You choose.
Assent is lacking. We don't remember these violations long enough to keep voting out the weasels.
As long as they have food on the table, people want dictators.
By that token, people want anything. Dictators promise anything.
Look at statistics on popular support for Snowden, for example.
And his act is entirely misunderstood by so many. What we don't know is infinitely more dangerous than what is admitted to. Our enemies know. We should also
My comment was intended to be figurative; that the industry is driven to smaller and smaller processes, and eventually must, in the instance of silicon, reach unavoidable limits. Intel is looking at new materials, as all others must be, in the drive to minimum process size. And management's answer to engineering's complaint that 'it can't be done yet' is 'try harder'.
No one I know at Intel is happy. They have, so far, missed the mobile market, are under enormous pressure in every other market, and their most competitive and profitable products serve apparently declining demand.
I'm not into GoT at all, the gratuitous everything is not for me. If the Sopranos were starting now, I wouldn't watch it either, but I changed. I choose my entertainment sex and violence differently now.
I watch a lot of Cupcake Wars, Chopped, and a seemingly infinite stream of Lifetime Movies filmed in either Vancouver or Toronto. With my wife.
She complains about my before-she-wakes-Saturday-EPL-watching-addiction.
Men and women are different.
I, for instance, can watch nearly any movie, so ling as I have a reason other than paying for it or being alone to watch it. So if I am watching movies with my wife I can be sufficiently interested to watch chick flicks, tearjerkers, and formulaic men/women behaving badly. We don't watch swimming pool movies together, I no longer do at all. But she's all in for Battlestar/Star Trek/Star Wars/Marvel/DC anything, as well as Bond/Bourne/anything with Liam Neeson.
I go to the movie theater for the popcorn, and to be entertained. Ratings mean less when the action is more.
But on TV, I see plenty of drivel on LMN, etc, and of course Netflix etc. that is rated so low it's presumed to bore my recliner, and surprise, it's at least as entertaining as the highly thought of crap that poses as mainstream.
Ratings mean very very little and for Sex and the City even less, because, well, SATC is so OLD it is well understood, and anyone wanting to know if it's 'any good' will get lots of opinions, and probably invest in one episode.
Full disclosure; I watched EVERY episode of SATC, first because it aired right after The Sopranos, and later because it was good enough to finish my evenings with.
Modern firing squad. Pros: Plenty of volunteers for the squad, trust me on this; no cost, the volunteers willingly undergo training and will provide their own approved ammo. Cons: Outrage from the many who will be offended by this; more outrage from the many who will be outraged by this; rampant misunderstanding of the process.
Sadly, none of these will be simple to implement:
- Testing. On animals. This will offend someone.
- Developing the actual process. This will also offend someone.
- Defending the practice of capital punishment.
Is this permissible, that a drug maker should refuse to provide products for legal use? Seems they provide them for off-label uses, which are merely unapproved, not necessarily illegal. But it's their business.
As I alluded to earlier, I could Velcro one of these to my Rigidbot, run Octoprint, camera and all, and not be bothered even with a couple of screws to mount a B or 3. Size does matter, sometimes.
You have described the problem micro-sized manufacturers have always had. Just don't rely on injection molding for parts, since you'll be back whining about tooling and iterative design.
"we've evolved to a bizarro state where we must hand over our content to strangers in order for it to be useful to us. "
Yes. Like the Postal Service. Telephones.
What you said.
Time for you to move elsewhere. Freedom and liberty are not given. They are literally, literally fought for, constantly. Lead, follow, or get out of the way. You choose.
The sad thing is that the majority supports this.
Assent is lacking. We don't remember these violations long enough to keep voting out the weasels.
As long as they have food on the table, people want dictators.
By that token, people want anything. Dictators promise anything.
Look at statistics on popular support for Snowden, for example.
And his act is entirely misunderstood by so many. What we don't know is infinitely more dangerous than what is admitted to. Our enemies know. We should also
My comment was intended to be figurative; that the industry is driven to smaller and smaller processes, and eventually must, in the instance of silicon, reach unavoidable limits. Intel is looking at new materials, as all others must be, in the drive to minimum process size. And management's answer to engineering's complaint that 'it can't be done yet' is 'try harder'.
No one I know at Intel is happy. They have, so far, missed the mobile market, are under enormous pressure in every other market, and their most competitive and profitable products serve apparently declining demand.
And you're also thinking literally.
You're still thinking in Silicon. Intel isn't.
And no one i know at Intel is sleeping well, still. They are challenged, and struggling, to keep innovating all the way to the 0.1nm process.
"the corporate propaganda drive "
You refer to the Worldwide News Media.
The differences being that the Chinese government is expecting their campaign to be 0. effective and 1. meaningful.
recurse/ /recurse
The sad part is that you replied to that post.
"A show like sex and the city paints a pretty shallow, incomplete, and unfortunate picture of both sexes"
I was never under the delusion that TV shows show the truth of anything, especially "Reality TV".
I'm not into GoT at all, the gratuitous everything is not for me. If the Sopranos were starting now, I wouldn't watch it either, but I changed. I choose my entertainment sex and violence differently now.
Yes, I was.
Because I did. And I'm honest about it.
Really, it was a current show before anyone thought rating it online was a thing.
If you are observant, you realize that men are intended to be victims of feminism.
Coincidentally, women are also.
For the beach houses, of course.
That's White Male Privilege, you insensitive clod.
ST:E is so retro it's nearly steampunk. Fabulous just for that. Leave it alone.
I watch a lot of Cupcake Wars, Chopped, and a seemingly infinite stream of Lifetime Movies filmed in either Vancouver or Toronto. With my wife.
She complains about my before-she-wakes-Saturday-EPL-watching-addiction.
Men and women are different.
I, for instance, can watch nearly any movie, so ling as I have a reason other than paying for it or being alone to watch it. So if I am watching movies with my wife I can be sufficiently interested to watch chick flicks, tearjerkers, and formulaic men/women behaving badly. We don't watch swimming pool movies together, I no longer do at all. But she's all in for Battlestar/Star Trek/Star Wars/Marvel/DC anything, as well as Bond/Bourne/anything with Liam Neeson.
I go to the movie theater for the popcorn, and to be entertained. Ratings mean less when the action is more.
But on TV, I see plenty of drivel on LMN, etc, and of course Netflix etc. that is rated so low it's presumed to bore my recliner, and surprise, it's at least as entertaining as the highly thought of crap that poses as mainstream.
Ratings mean very very little and for Sex and the City even less, because, well, SATC is so OLD it is well understood, and anyone wanting to know if it's 'any good' will get lots of opinions, and probably invest in one episode.
Full disclosure; I watched EVERY episode of SATC, first because it aired right after The Sopranos, and later because it was good enough to finish my evenings with.
"women don't seem to feel the need to go trash-talk shows that are designed to appeal to men"
Citation please.
CO
Morphine (chops to all the other psoters, u wun)
Heroin (redundant, I know)
A multitude of anesthetics.
Modern firing squad. Pros: Plenty of volunteers for the squad, trust me on this; no cost, the volunteers willingly undergo training and will provide their own approved ammo. Cons: Outrage from the many who will be offended by this; more outrage from the many who will be outraged by this; rampant misunderstanding of the process.
Sadly, none of these will be simple to implement:
- Testing. On animals. This will offend someone.
- Developing the actual process. This will also offend someone.
- Defending the practice of capital punishment.
Is this permissible, that a drug maker should refuse to provide products for legal use? Seems they provide them for off-label uses, which are merely unapproved, not necessarily illegal. But it's their business.
As I alluded to earlier, I could Velcro one of these to my Rigidbot, run Octoprint, camera and all, and not be bothered even with a couple of screws to mount a B or 3. Size does matter, sometimes.
Stock enough to survive the evolution.
Redesign your form factors to survive changes.
OR design your own.
You have described the problem micro-sized manufacturers have always had. Just don't rely on injection molding for parts, since you'll be back whining about tooling and iterative design.
Octoprint? Now, with the camera clip, it's all there.
And you need a Velcro patch for a mount. Seriously, this is elegant.
True, but...
I'm the DR/business continuity guy on the team, and enabling virtual work is key to that, so I have to ensure we have the tools.
All meetings at work have dial - in. All. Live Meeting is our share, though WebEx is gaining.
We respond to problems to crisis situations, no coding. And we respond to multiple reporters on a regular basis. Chat solves this when we are virtual.
And we are virtual weekly, so we are accustomed to that environment.
We also have a lot of virtual customers...