Not that I'm supporting it, but where would Theistic Evolution fit in to these numbers? Some would lump that into the 17% since it involves intelligence directing the evolution. Others just dump it in the general evolution category even though it is quite different.
... and as I see it this is the main problem. Why can't we just have a nice article about the science of a bee's flight? I vote that the science articles should be about science and there can be a related article in the politics section for anyone wishing to discuss how this applies to creation or evolution!
Slashdot Mirror
Not that I'm supporting it, but where would Theistic Evolution fit in to these numbers? Some would lump that into the 17% since it involves intelligence directing the evolution. Others just dump it in the general evolution category even though it is quite different.
So how long until there is enough junk up there to block a sufficient amount of the sun's heat and fix the global warming issue?
... and as I see it this is the main problem. Why can't we just have a nice article about the science of a bee's flight? I vote that the science articles should be about science and there can be a related article in the politics section for anyone wishing to discuss how this applies to creation or evolution!