Four minutes after you wrote "bye." That's gotta be a record.
I don't recall your requirement that the manufacturer list the device in the place of your choosing. Or even in English. Moving the goalposts yet again?
That would be a support page for a computer. But thanks for playing your usual "I won't believe clear evidence shoved in my face" denial of reality.
Don't believe me that Cannon Lake is not available? Then maybe you will believe your Apple friends.
Don't believe you. Don't believe them. Totally believe the jd.com page listing for a computer model supported by Lenovo with a Lenovo-stated release date and specs appearing all over the internet.
BTW: Apple Insider are not my friends and your own NUC article says that those processors in those NUCs are available for pre-order and shipping in September, so please continue to tell me how they're not available until 2H19. That's not likely to come back and bite you in the ass at all.
I'm not the one who said they stalk people on the internet for fun.
Neither am I. I said "I'll haunt you so long as it amuses me." I can't stalk someone who's continually engaging with me in this particular set of article comments, and correcting your particular bullshit is a riot. You're free to piss off to a different topic and engage in interference-free idiocy if you'd like. I'm not the one that announced "bye" and then stuck around to engage even more.
P.S. Do you think people reading your near continual stream of insults truly believe that you have the upper hand, or recognize the signs of someone failing miserably at defending an indefensible position?
Wow. You found an article describing the very NUC that I linked to in the post that you replied to. It's like you're after-the-fact psychic.
I can buy it now. Pay them money, get a receipt, and everything. It ships this week or next, yet I'm sure that somehow disqualifies the transaction as "buying" in your bizzarro-worldview.
The China argument doesn't let you weasel out of that one.
I don't need to weasel, you said you doubted that "any product currently ships with it." The Lenovo 330c-15ICN is "any product." Multiple places reported upon the listing. You're just a sore loser.
OK, prove your point then. I hope you understand the difference between announced and available. Show me where I can get this part on Newegg.
Again your reading comprehension fails you. It was released in May in China. Whether you personally can buy it on Newegg is not the measure of whether "any product currently ships with it."
I mean, you wrote the standard. At least pretend to live up to it. Funny how everyone needs to prove things to you, while you accept your own speculation as gospel. Widespread reporting trumps your personal beliefs. Try again, and do better.
Nobody can deny that Intel is having major problems with 10nm production, but you just can't resist projecting your biases onto a reality that stubbornly refuses to conform, can you?
Doofus, Apple went from 61% share of the smarwatch market to 17% today.
From a majority of a "smartwatch" market incluing Apple and Samsung -- but not Fitbit and others who made "basic wearables" -- to 17% today where there is almost no such thing such thing as "basic wearables" because the survivors have all moved into "smartwatches." Odd how you insist upon starting in 2015, versus 2016 (10.8%) or 2014 (0% - no Apple watch). Perhaps because in 2015 Apple and Samsung were the only game in town, and Samsung was a distant also-ran.
I would not be surprised if Apple hits single digits by this time last year.
Can't hit single digits by this time last year because, like, that already happened, and Apple's market share increased from 10.8% in 2016. Do try to keep up.
This butt ugly power hungry product update practically guarantees it.
Apple will be shipping its updated product back in time? Wow! Triple digit sales growth here we come!/s
Apple had 61% of the smartwatch market in 2015 and 17% today. That's what I call falling behind, not taking the lead.
Imagine that - it essentially had no competition in 2015. Apple is the market leader now. It is growing faster than Xiaomi now. It introduced a new generation product now. How is Xiaomi "set to take the lead" exactly? You can't fall behind people that you're pulling away from.
Apple has 17% of the smartwatch market, with Xiaomi looking set to take the lead in the near future. That is, 83% of smartwatch buyers today do not want Apple.
Yes, you won the internet blowhard award today. You must be fun at parties.
Linking to actual tech articles and manufacturer info = blowhard, but saying that a product announcement "strongly suggests" something that it in no way does = proof.
The fun part is that you were compelled to rebut anyone who dared to reply to your "What things? That actually matter to a watch?" with an almost fact-free and snarky reply. Which is the epitome of being a blowhard.
"At the same frequency and process, the A35 architecture (codenamed Mercury), promises to be 10% lower power than the A7 while giving an 6-40% performance uplift depending on use-case. In integer workloads (SPECint2006) the A35 gives about 6% higher throughput than the A7, while floating point (SPECfp2000) is supposed to give a more substantial 36% increase"
To paraphrase an apparent hypocrite: Your argument still not supported, you are trying to parse a product announcement. How lame. See if you can find something better, good luck.
Slashdot Mirror
Not a requirement in your standard of "any product currently ships with it."
Moved goalposts, meet immovable end zone.
You really don't get it, do you?
You say bye, you go.
I don't say bye, I stay. And I keep replying to you. FOREVER.
Four minutes after you wrote "bye." That's gotta be a record.
I don't recall your requirement that the manufacturer list the device in the place of your choosing. Or even in English. Moving the goalposts yet again?
Bye is not a command. And you're incapable of staying away.
That would be a support page for a computer. But thanks for playing your usual "I won't believe clear evidence shoved in my face" denial of reality.
Don't believe you. Don't believe them. Totally believe the jd.com page listing for a computer model supported by Lenovo with a Lenovo-stated release date and specs appearing all over the internet.
BTW: Apple Insider are not my friends and your own NUC article says that those processors in those NUCs are available for pre-order and shipping in September, so please continue to tell me how they're not available until 2H19. That's not likely to come back and bite you in the ass at all.
Neither am I. I said "I'll haunt you so long as it amuses me." I can't stalk someone who's continually engaging with me in this particular set of article comments, and correcting your particular bullshit is a riot. You're free to piss off to a different topic and engage in interference-free idiocy if you'd like. I'm not the one that announced "bye" and then stuck around to engage even more.
You couldn't find it? By searching English language media in the US? Big surprise. I could. Note the release date: 08 May 2018.
Oddly everyone can find info about this, except for you.
P.S. Do you think people reading your near continual stream of insults truly believe that you have the upper hand, or recognize the signs of someone failing miserably at defending an indefensible position?
You actually look for people talking about you under posts that are not yours? OMFG.
But I'm having fun. It's like pointing a wind-up robot at the end of your counter and watching it haplessly march off, with no ability to stop itself.
TL says crazy shit.
Rebut it with a link.
TL either claims that it's all lies or moves the goalposts, and the onlookers share their heads.
Repeat.
The fun part is never thinks that he'll get called on the crazy shit, then loses it in short order when he is.
That's not a product announcement, Billy boy. That there's a buy-it page. If you'd actually read the articles saying that it was available back in May, you might have figured that out by now.
Wow. You found an article describing the very NUC that I linked to in the post that you replied to. It's like you're after-the-fact psychic.
I can buy it now. Pay them money, get a receipt, and everything. It ships this week or next, yet I'm sure that somehow disqualifies the transaction as "buying" in your bizzarro-worldview.
I did. The article, and all the others reporting the listing on jd.com. You show evidence that it was not.
For about one more week.
I don't need to weasel, you said you doubted that "any product currently ships with it." The Lenovo 330c-15ICN is "any product." Multiple places reported upon the listing. You're just a sore loser.
You're projecting again.
Again your reading comprehension fails you. It was released in May in China. Whether you personally can buy it on Newegg is not the measure of whether "any product currently ships with it."
I mean, you wrote the standard. At least pretend to live up to it. Funny how everyone needs to prove things to you, while you accept your own speculation as gospel. Widespread reporting trumps your personal beliefs. Try again, and do better.
I'm not the one who wrote "bye." I'll haunt you so long as it amuses me, and I'm not going to pretend any different.
Hello! More fact free drivel, I see. You just canâ(TM)t bring yourself to actually end the conversation. So why did you write âoeBye.â?
Didn't you say "bye" several posts ago?
About as truthful as the rest of your drivel, I guess.
You just love to make declarations that are easily proven wrong, don't you?
Nobody can deny that Intel is having major problems with 10nm production, but you just can't resist projecting your biases onto a reality that stubbornly refuses to conform, can you?
From a majority of a "smartwatch" market incluing Apple and Samsung -- but not Fitbit and others who made "basic wearables" -- to 17% today where there is almost no such thing such thing as "basic wearables" because the survivors have all moved into "smartwatches." Odd how you insist upon starting in 2015, versus 2016 (10.8%) or 2014 (0% - no Apple watch). Perhaps because in 2015 Apple and Samsung were the only game in town, and Samsung was a distant also-ran.
Can't hit single digits by this time last year because, like, that already happened, and Apple's market share increased from 10.8% in 2016. Do try to keep up.
Apple will be shipping its updated product back in time? Wow! Triple digit sales growth here we come! /s
Weren't you talking about Xiaomi being "set to take the lead?" Oh wait, we're moving the goalposts again.
Asks the man-child who's been posting in the Apple product announcement threads for ten and a half hours.
You're projecting.
Imagine that - it essentially had no competition in 2015. Apple is the market leader now. It is growing faster than Xiaomi now. It introduced a new generation product now. How is Xiaomi "set to take the lead" exactly? You can't fall behind people that you're pulling away from.
Well that's not what's happening. Going from 13 to 17% marketshare is the opposite of being ground down towards single digit share.
Odd.
Source?
Apple grew its market share by 4% from 13 to 17%.
Xiaomi grew its market share by 1.8% from 13.3% to 15.1%.
That's called falling behind, not taking the lead.
Linking to actual tech articles and manufacturer info = blowhard, but saying that a product announcement "strongly suggests" something that it in no way does = proof.
The fun part is that you were compelled to rebut anyone who dared to reply to your "What things? That actually matter to a watch?" with an almost fact-free and snarky reply. Which is the epitome of being a blowhard.
I win.
"At the same frequency and process, the A35 architecture (codenamed Mercury), promises to be 10% lower power than the A7 while giving an 6-40% performance uplift depending on use-case. In integer workloads (SPECint2006) the A35 gives about 6% higher throughput than the A7, while floating point (SPECfp2000) is supposed to give a more substantial 36% increase"
Still not proven false, and you quit.
To paraphrase an apparent hypocrite: Your argument still not supported, you are trying to parse a product announcement. How lame. See if you can find something better, good luck.