Republicans can not blame Democrats for failing by 90 votes when they have a majority in the House.
There wasn't a single Democrat vote for it, and the Democrats derided it. Even if it passed in the House, it would not have passed in the Senate. If Democrats were not the party of illegal immigration, there wouldn't be this divide and we'd have an immigration overhaul that made sense for Americans.
No it wasn't. Some portions certainly were but the entirety of the West never seriously entertained communism and neither did most third world countries.
The US was the strongest defender of capitalism. Much of Europe was leaning towards socialist policies.
One of the founding philosophies of this country was the need to protect minority rights.
There is no minority "right" for 99.9% of the people to respect the delusions of 0.1% of the people.
And you've never used a public rest room if you think that's what goes on in them.
I gave you a link for a real-world case. It was a locker room, not a public rest room.
You're ignoring that the Republicans haven't even tried to use their majority in all areas to pass meaningful legistlation in regards to illegal immigration without that stupid wall attached.
Oh, so "the wall" is what's holding this up? And not immigration reform? And considering all the government waste that goes on, why is $25 billion dollars towards a wall the deal-killer?
The Democrats have demanded a "clean" amnesty bill, which means they want amnesty and nothing else.
States are under no obligation to enforce federal law
It's not a matter of legal obligation. It's a matter of what they normally choose to do in other areas of federal law, and what they have chosen to do in explicit opposition to federal enforcement of illegal immigration. Of course you know this, which is why you're engaging in pedantry instead of addressing my point.
Look at your own link and note the racists (nativists), getting the vapors at these ideas.
That link was from 2015. Where's your link showing they were deported by ICE? That's right, you don't have one.
With a laughable source that has zero credibility on partisan issues. Snopes is the same hack outfit that twisted itself into knots to justify Hillary's corruption on the Uranium One deal.
I agree Snopes can be partisan. However, they make reference-based claims which are up to you to dispute. You have not done so, because you know on this issue they are correct. You also haven't addressed the Obama DREAMers, the "sanctuary" cities/states, or the Democrat fuss over the citizenship question on the US census.
He opposed gay marriage and compared it to bestiality in court. Facts.
I searched for this, and the closest I could find was a reference to Huckabee. You're going to need a reference for your "fact". I'll put my money on you not providing one.
You're engaging in the same Obamabot delusion of looking at (some) of the man's words while ignoring his actions completely.
You mean when his administration came out in support of gay marriage, backing US courts? You're the delusional one, caught up in the past of a hesitant Obama who came out in full support once the political winds shifted.
Keep it up and in a few years you might be caught up to events that happened a decade ago.
Maybe if you stopped pretending that time stopped moving ten years ago you'd catch up to today's political reality.
So you just want to tear up most of the bill of rights just to suit your nativist jihad.
Lulz, there is no "bill of rights" to live in the country illegally. We have people here who openly declare they are illegal immigrants.
Borders formed 100% on land that was taken illegally?
Cry me a fucking river. That's what ever migrating people have done, including the Spaniards who slaughtered the Aztecs and created Mexico. But thanks for confirming that you don't believe in borders, dipshit.
Republicans control both houses of congress and the presidency. If the Democrats can pass the Affordable Care act under such conditions then Republicans should be able to do something infinitely less complex like make using an alreadying existing e-verify system manditory.
You're ignoring that Democrats had a filibuster-proof 60 member majority.
It's pedantry when you ignore that states and cities routinely cooperate with federal officials in other areas, and that the Democrats explicitly made cooperation over immigration illegal.
Ice Is will happily take note of undocumented school board officials et all and will arrest their asses.
So where has that happened? Go on, post your link. Also explain how ICE is going to round up illegal voters when "sanctuary" cities/states run the local elections. I'm noticing a pattern in you, that you ignore major points, repeat yourself, and post stupid YouTube links.
What part of "Obama deported more immigrants than all previous presidents combined" are you having a hard time understanding?
Hey look, you did it again, minus the dumb YouTube link. I've already addressed this. Your claim was bogus, you ignored the Obama-enacted "DREAMers", you ignored the Democrat "sanctuary" cities and states, and you ignored the Democrat fuss about a US citizenship question on the census.
You're engaging in the same willful denial of reality as Obamabots who think the main was sainted before birth - you guys hang out for coffee?
You accuse me of what you do: willful denial of reality.
Nothing changed. Obama, the first black president, had a full "states rights" position on another minority
You forgot that Obama supported gay marriage. The "states rights" was a fig-leaf, which Biden in his typically bungling fashion knocked aside. Obama was just playing politics.
All of the gains in gay rights at the federal level have come from the courts, in spite of Democrats.
It was the Obama administration that backed the US Supreme Court decision that legalized gay marriage across the land. Gay marriage was a Democrat issue, even if many of them were reluctant to be on the bleeding edge.
Border wall
What border wall? Why are we having fights over a border wall, which the Democrats refused to fund, then?
plus a brutal deportation system
Oh, is that why we have millions of illegal immigrants living here, with almost no chance of deportation, unless they commit a crime? Is that why Democrat cities/states have enacted "sanctuary" policies?
You're just upset that we enforce the border at all.
If Republicans were really serious about illegal immigration they'd propose solutions to illegal immigration that would actually stand a chance at working well like making the already existing e-verify system mandatory for employers in this country. No jobs for illegal immigrants means no illegal immigrants, it's incredibly simple.
How is that going to happen when Democrats opposed an amnesty grant for "Dreamers" in exchange for an immigration overhaul? Do you think they're ever going to accept nationally mandated e-verify? Democrat states have become "sanctuary" states. Democrats have become the party of illegal immigrants.
But no, stupid ideas like a massively expensive wall that will do nothing to change the simple supply and demand nature of illegal immigration and the labor they provide and thus do very little to solve the problem is what's popular right now among Republicans.
It was only 25 billion for the wall, along with an end to chain migration, and a focus on merit-based immigration. What were the Democrats opposed to?
That last part I will freely admit is pure speculation on my part but the fact that the Republican party is more concerned about making noise about illegal immigration than they are about solving it is easily observed.
Look at which states have mandated e-verify, versus which states are "sanctuary" states. I do agree there are business-friendly cuckservatives like Paul Ryan who have no interest in stamping out floods of cheap labor.
The only realistic way to determine how far out of wack a given ideology is, is to compare it to others so as to be able to put it on a spectrum.
Last century the rest of the world was moving towards communism, while the US was the strongest supporter of capitalism. But it was the United States that was proven right.
On social issues (which is what you seem to have a hard on for here) they are very much in line with mainstream political views throughout the first world which means they are not "hard" anything.
Transgender "rights" are for something like 0.1% of the population, of which 99.9% of society are required to reprogram themselves and respect the delusions of an extremely tiny minority. Yes, you are hard-left if you think that a biological male that "identifies" as a woman has a right to hang out with biological women with his male genitalia hanging out.
But back to the main point, mass migration affects both social issues and economics. Welfare costs, schools, healthcare, and wages are all affected.
You've ignored remedial civics - immigration is a federal issues, not a state issue. States no more have to worry about immigration than the FBI needs to worry about pet or noise ordinances in L.A.
You're engaging in pedantry. States and local governments routinely cooperate with federal officials on law enforcement issues. The Democrats have gone out of their way to not cooperate on illegal immigration.
And anyone who participates can count on making their own ICE Is videos in short order, proving my point.
All you've proved is that you can make a non-sequitur while linking to propaganda videos from friends-of-Democrats. *golf clap*
You haven't addressed that Democrats show no inclination of enforcing immigration laws -- quite the opposite. Yet somehow you think illegals will be in grave danger of voting when it's a local issue, not a federal one. Of course the Democrats blocked all efforts by Trump's administration to verify the integrity of the elections, and they are doing the same for a US citizenship question on the census.
You need to pull your head out of the wingnutosphere.
You need to look in the mirror and address the world as it is today.
Obama deported more immigrants than all previous presidents combined
False. Also, it was Obama who unconstitutionally created the "DREAM"ers.
, and the Clintons were for a border wall 20 years before it was cool.
Obama and Clinton used to be against gay marriage, too. A lot has changed in 10 years. The Dems have moved hard-left as they've won issue after issue. What's left for them? Transgender bathroom "rights"? "Islamophobia"? Pedophiles? They've ditched the American worker, and the only sustainable base they have left is immigrants, who reliably vote Democrat.
And remind us again who granted amnesty to millions of immigrants in the 80's?
Remind me again how that was supposed to be a one-time thing, in exchange for fixing the border? Oh look, here we are again. And which party is fighting for MOAR immigrants, and fighting against a policy of limited immigration based on merit?
1) The last thing the undocumented want is to bring attention from the state as that leads to them being deported.
You've ignored that the "sanctuary" state of California and the cities within have shown no inclination to do anything to deport illegal immigrants -- quite the opposite. San Francisco is now allowing them to vote in school elections, and some cities even bring them into the government.
2) The undocumented know that both political parties hate their guts.
*snort* The Democrats have become the party of illegal immigration. Immigrants are the party's base of the future. If Democrats were really serious about immigration, they'd work with Trump and bring a sane immigration policy that put American interests first.
Sure there is. You can add up all the confirmed cases of in-person voting fraud, and use it as an estimate of how likely it is that there are millions of people committing in-person voter fraud in California.
Given that California is a "sanctuary" state, what makes you think officials there would do what it takes to look for election fraud? There's widespread fraud when it comes to illegal identification, and the state has an open-arms policies to illegal immigrants, but we're supposed to believe the elections are squeaky clean.
The term "fake news" arose in US dialog to describe bizarrely distorted and completely made up hit pieces put out against Hilary Clinto and the Democrat campaign by various Trump-supporting people and also certain foreign actors, some of whom were supporting Trump and some were just out to make a living off ad-click revenue.
Just to set the record straight:
The term "fake news" went viral by panicked and authoritarian leftists after Trump won the election. It was an attempt to conflate blatantly "fake news" clickbait with right-leaning websites, so that those sites would be censored by the tech giants, conveniently ignoring the mirror version on the left. The future is now:
"So what happens if Facebook staff were to look at Zimdars' list and accept it and decide to censor the sharing of headlines from these sites? It's within Facebook's power and right to do so, but it would be a terrible decision on their end. They wouldn't just be preventing the spreading of factually incorrect, fabricated stories. They would be blocking a lot of opinionated analysis from sites on the basis of their ideologies. The company would face a backlash for such a decision that could impact their bottom line."
Well, how comforting. They didn't shadowban every GOP member. But if you want to get into parsing words, the person you responded to didn't say everyone would be banned. He said:
Nah, it's much easier than that. Just label all of your opposition deplorable racists. See? Problem solved....now you can ban anyone on the "other side".
Notice the word "anyone"? So just pick some prime targets, use the umbrella excuse "deplorable racist", and done.
Historically, by far the most cost effective way to reduce crime has been to improve prenatal and early childhood nutrition and remove environmental pollutants, especially heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and mercury. Today, black children in America have twice the average blood lead levels as white children, and prison inmates have three times the average.
Except that it is. Twitter was so fucking obvious about it that they actually went and censored Republican politicians. How much more blatant can you be?
Man, that really is simple. "Computer, censor the view point that opposes my own." I didn't realize that programming had come so far, that's pretty impressive.
Yes, it's trivial. Identify the main people posting wrongthink. See who follows them. Check if they are on blocklists by the double-plus goodthink users. Look for wrongthink symbols like MAGA and American flags. Et cetera.
It's an algorithm based on posting behavior. If they don't want to be banned like trolls, maybe they shouldn't, you know, troll people.
It's an algorithm created and tuned by leftists at Twitter gearing up for the midterm elections. They define who a "troll" is. They decide which accounts are acting in "bad faith".
RWNJ snowflakes still seeing oppression everywhere, even when their team owns all of DC, and most of the airwaves.
Outside of Fox, which is mostly watched by old people, what media does the right "own"? Every other mainstream legacy outlet is anti-Trump. And all the major social media platforms, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, have an extreme leftist bias when it comes to censorship. There's a leftist bias at Google, the near-monopoly search engine. What more do you want?
Yes, it's in the right-hand margin, with the caption: "PR Image eso1824c Neptune from the VLT and Hubble "
You could choose to be anything, but for some reason you chose to be a condescending asshole - twice.
Maybe you should look in the mirror. My replies were rather tame and to the point. If you don't like being treated this way, don't cast aspersions on others when the failing is yours.
Slashdot Mirror
Republicans can not blame Democrats for failing by 90 votes when they have a majority in the House.
There wasn't a single Democrat vote for it, and the Democrats derided it. Even if it passed in the House, it would not have passed in the Senate. If Democrats were not the party of illegal immigration, there wouldn't be this divide and we'd have an immigration overhaul that made sense for Americans.
No it wasn't. Some portions certainly were but the entirety of the West never seriously entertained communism and neither did most third world countries.
The US was the strongest defender of capitalism. Much of Europe was leaning towards socialist policies.
One of the founding philosophies of this country was the need to protect minority rights.
There is no minority "right" for 99.9% of the people to respect the delusions of 0.1% of the people.
And you've never used a public rest room if you think that's what goes on in them.
I gave you a link for a real-world case. It was a locker room, not a public rest room.
You're ignoring that the Republicans haven't even tried to use their majority in all areas to pass meaningful legistlation in regards to illegal immigration without that stupid wall attached.
Oh, so "the wall" is what's holding this up? And not immigration reform? And considering all the government waste that goes on, why is $25 billion dollars towards a wall the deal-killer?
The Democrats have demanded a "clean" amnesty bill, which means they want amnesty and nothing else.
States are under no obligation to enforce federal law
It's not a matter of legal obligation. It's a matter of what they normally choose to do in other areas of federal law, and what they have chosen to do in explicit opposition to federal enforcement of illegal immigration. Of course you know this, which is why you're engaging in pedantry instead of addressing my point.
Look at your own link and note the racists (nativists), getting the vapors at these ideas.
That link was from 2015. Where's your link showing they were deported by ICE? That's right, you don't have one.
With a laughable source that has zero credibility on partisan issues. Snopes is the same hack outfit that twisted itself into knots to justify Hillary's corruption on the Uranium One deal.
I agree Snopes can be partisan. However, they make reference-based claims which are up to you to dispute. You have not done so, because you know on this issue they are correct. You also haven't addressed the Obama DREAMers, the "sanctuary" cities/states, or the Democrat fuss over the citizenship question on the US census.
He opposed gay marriage and compared it to bestiality in court. Facts.
I searched for this, and the closest I could find was a reference to Huckabee. You're going to need a reference for your "fact". I'll put my money on you not providing one.
You're engaging in the same Obamabot delusion of looking at (some) of the man's words while ignoring his actions completely.
You mean when his administration came out in support of gay marriage, backing US courts? You're the delusional one, caught up in the past of a hesitant Obama who came out in full support once the political winds shifted.
Keep it up and in a few years you might be caught up to events that happened a decade ago.
Maybe if you stopped pretending that time stopped moving ten years ago you'd catch up to today's political reality.
So you just want to tear up most of the bill of rights just to suit your nativist jihad.
Lulz, there is no "bill of rights" to live in the country illegally. We have people here who openly declare they are illegal immigrants.
Borders formed 100% on land that was taken illegally?
Cry me a fucking river. That's what ever migrating people have done, including the Spaniards who slaughtered the Aztecs and created Mexico. But thanks for confirming that you don't believe in borders, dipshit.
Republicans control both houses of congress and the presidency. If the Democrats can pass the Affordable Care act under such conditions then Republicans should be able to do something infinitely less complex like make using an alreadying existing e-verify system manditory.
You're ignoring that Democrats had a filibuster-proof 60 member majority.
Nothing pedantic about remedial civics.
It's pedantry when you ignore that states and cities routinely cooperate with federal officials in other areas, and that the Democrats explicitly made cooperation over immigration illegal.
Ice Is will happily take note of undocumented school board officials et all and will arrest their asses.
So where has that happened? Go on, post your link. Also explain how ICE is going to round up illegal voters when "sanctuary" cities/states run the local elections. I'm noticing a pattern in you, that you ignore major points, repeat yourself, and post stupid YouTube links.
What part of "Obama deported more immigrants than all previous presidents combined" are you having a hard time understanding?
Hey look, you did it again, minus the dumb YouTube link. I've already addressed this. Your claim was bogus, you ignored the Obama-enacted "DREAMers", you ignored the Democrat "sanctuary" cities and states, and you ignored the Democrat fuss about a US citizenship question on the census.
You're engaging in the same willful denial of reality as Obamabots who think the main was sainted before birth - you guys hang out for coffee?
You accuse me of what you do: willful denial of reality.
Nothing changed. Obama, the first black president, had a full "states rights" position on another minority
You forgot that Obama supported gay marriage. The "states rights" was a fig-leaf, which Biden in his typically bungling fashion knocked aside. Obama was just playing politics.
All of the gains in gay rights at the federal level have come from the courts, in spite of Democrats.
It was the Obama administration that backed the US Supreme Court decision that legalized gay marriage across the land. Gay marriage was a Democrat issue, even if many of them were reluctant to be on the bleeding edge.
Border wall
What border wall? Why are we having fights over a border wall, which the Democrats refused to fund, then?
plus a brutal deportation system
Oh, is that why we have millions of illegal immigrants living here, with almost no chance of deportation, unless they commit a crime? Is that why Democrat cities/states have enacted "sanctuary" policies?
You're just upset that we enforce the border at all.
If Republicans were really serious about illegal immigration they'd propose solutions to illegal immigration that would actually stand a chance at working well like making the already existing e-verify system mandatory for employers in this country. No jobs for illegal immigrants means no illegal immigrants, it's incredibly simple.
How is that going to happen when Democrats opposed an amnesty grant for "Dreamers" in exchange for an immigration overhaul? Do you think they're ever going to accept nationally mandated e-verify? Democrat states have become "sanctuary" states. Democrats have become the party of illegal immigrants.
But no, stupid ideas like a massively expensive wall that will do nothing to change the simple supply and demand nature of illegal immigration and the labor they provide and thus do very little to solve the problem is what's popular right now among Republicans.
It was only 25 billion for the wall, along with an end to chain migration, and a focus on merit-based immigration. What were the Democrats opposed to?
That last part I will freely admit is pure speculation on my part but the fact that the Republican party is more concerned about making noise about illegal immigration than they are about solving it is easily observed.
Look at which states have mandated e-verify, versus which states are "sanctuary" states. I do agree there are business-friendly cuckservatives like Paul Ryan who have no interest in stamping out floods of cheap labor.
The only realistic way to determine how far out of wack a given ideology is, is to compare it to others so as to be able to put it on a spectrum.
Last century the rest of the world was moving towards communism, while the US was the strongest supporter of capitalism. But it was the United States that was proven right.
On social issues (which is what you seem to have a hard on for here) they are very much in line with mainstream political views throughout the first world which means they are not "hard" anything.
Transgender "rights" are for something like 0.1% of the population, of which 99.9% of society are required to reprogram themselves and respect the delusions of an extremely tiny minority. Yes, you are hard-left if you think that a biological male that "identifies" as a woman has a right to hang out with biological women with his male genitalia hanging out.
But back to the main point, mass migration affects both social issues and economics. Welfare costs, schools, healthcare, and wages are all affected.
It was shut down because Democrats refused to comply with requests for information.
You've ignored remedial civics - immigration is a federal issues, not a state issue. States no more have to worry about immigration than the FBI needs to worry about pet or noise ordinances in L.A.
You're engaging in pedantry. States and local governments routinely cooperate with federal officials on law enforcement issues. The Democrats have gone out of their way to not cooperate on illegal immigration.
And anyone who participates can count on making their own ICE Is videos in short order, proving my point.
All you've proved is that you can make a non-sequitur while linking to propaganda videos from friends-of-Democrats. *golf clap*
You haven't addressed that Democrats show no inclination of enforcing immigration laws -- quite the opposite. Yet somehow you think illegals will be in grave danger of voting when it's a local issue, not a federal one. Of course the Democrats blocked all efforts by Trump's administration to verify the integrity of the elections, and they are doing the same for a US citizenship question on the census.
You need to pull your head out of the wingnutosphere.
You need to look in the mirror and address the world as it is today.
Obama deported more immigrants than all previous presidents combined
False. Also, it was Obama who unconstitutionally created the "DREAM"ers.
, and the Clintons were for a border wall 20 years before it was cool.
Obama and Clinton used to be against gay marriage, too. A lot has changed in 10 years. The Dems have moved hard-left as they've won issue after issue. What's left for them? Transgender bathroom "rights"? "Islamophobia"? Pedophiles? They've ditched the American worker, and the only sustainable base they have left is immigrants, who reliably vote Democrat.
And remind us again who granted amnesty to millions of immigrants in the 80's?
Remind me again how that was supposed to be a one-time thing, in exchange for fixing the border? Oh look, here we are again. And which party is fighting for MOAR immigrants, and fighting against a policy of limited immigration based on merit?
1) The last thing the undocumented want is to bring attention from the state as that leads to them being deported.
You've ignored that the "sanctuary" state of California and the cities within have shown no inclination to do anything to deport illegal immigrants -- quite the opposite. San Francisco is now allowing them to vote in school elections, and some cities even bring them into the government.
2) The undocumented know that both political parties hate their guts.
*snort* The Democrats have become the party of illegal immigration. Immigrants are the party's base of the future. If Democrats were really serious about immigration, they'd work with Trump and bring a sane immigration policy that put American interests first.
Sure there is. You can add up all the confirmed cases of in-person voting fraud, and use it as an estimate of how likely it is that there are millions of people committing in-person voter fraud in California.
Given that California is a "sanctuary" state, what makes you think officials there would do what it takes to look for election fraud? There's widespread fraud when it comes to illegal identification, and the state has an open-arms policies to illegal immigrants, but we're supposed to believe the elections are squeaky clean.
The term "fake news" arose in US dialog to describe bizarrely distorted and completely made up hit pieces put out against Hilary Clinto and the Democrat campaign by various Trump-supporting people and also certain foreign actors, some of whom were supporting Trump and some were just out to make a living off ad-click revenue.
Just to set the record straight:
The term "fake news" went viral by panicked and authoritarian leftists after Trump won the election. It was an attempt to conflate blatantly "fake news" clickbait with right-leaning websites, so that those sites would be censored by the tech giants, conveniently ignoring the mirror version on the left. The future is now:
"So what happens if Facebook staff were to look at Zimdars' list and accept it and decide to censor the sharing of headlines from these sites? It's within Facebook's power and right to do so, but it would be a terrible decision on their end. They wouldn't just be preventing the spreading of factually incorrect, fabricated stories. They would be blocking a lot of opinionated analysis from sites on the basis of their ideologies. The company would face a backlash for such a decision that could impact their bottom line."
Well, how comforting. They didn't shadowban every GOP member. But if you want to get into parsing words, the person you responded to didn't say everyone would be banned. He said:
Nah, it's much easier than that. Just label all of your opposition deplorable racists. See? Problem solved....now you can ban anyone on the "other side".
Notice the word "anyone"? So just pick some prime targets, use the umbrella excuse "deplorable racist", and done.
Historically, by far the most cost effective way to reduce crime has been to improve prenatal and early childhood nutrition and remove environmental pollutants, especially heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and mercury. Today, black children in America have twice the average blood lead levels as white children, and prison inmates have three times the average.
Citation needed.
Designers, marketers, and bosses loved it because you had WYSIWYG control over everything.
Yes, they did. Let us not forget.
And end-users didn't really care
End-users did care because Flash was most notoriously known for obnoxious ads.
I suspect the problem is
That Twitter is run by a bunch of Lefists gearing up for the midterm elections after the Left had a meltdown after the last election?
that prominent racists try to avoid saying things that are obviously racist
Oh, so it's racist dogwhistles? Phew, what a relief! Now we can go back to open borders and violently attacking "fascists"!
Yep, that sure is easy, and also not happening.
Except that it is. Twitter was so fucking obvious about it that they actually went and censored Republican politicians. How much more blatant can you be?
Man, that really is simple. "Computer, censor the view point that opposes my own." I didn't realize that programming had come so far, that's pretty impressive.
Yes, it's trivial. Identify the main people posting wrongthink. See who follows them. Check if they are on blocklists by the double-plus goodthink users. Look for wrongthink symbols like MAGA and American flags. Et cetera.
Russia, Russia, Russia! It's funny how the left has become the party of McCarthyism.
I typed in the names of all the "shadow banned" people and they auto-populated into the drop down just fine and I don't follow any of them.
Because Twitter "fixed" the issue after it became a news story.
It's an algorithm based on posting behavior. If they don't want to be banned like trolls, maybe they shouldn't, you know, troll people.
It's an algorithm created and tuned by leftists at Twitter gearing up for the midterm elections. They define who a "troll" is. They decide which accounts are acting in "bad faith".
RWNJ snowflakes still seeing oppression everywhere, even when their team owns all of DC, and most of the airwaves.
Outside of Fox, which is mostly watched by old people, what media does the right "own"? Every other mainstream legacy outlet is anti-Trump. And all the major social media platforms, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, have an extreme leftist bias when it comes to censorship. There's a leftist bias at Google, the near-monopoly search engine. What more do you want?
Text games just don't have the same pull anymore for a new generation of players, I guess. I have no idea where they're moving to, though.
Second Life, of course. It's all the rage.
Translation: "I prefer legacy media to tell me what to think."
So , Was that the link in the article?
Yes, it's in the right-hand margin, with the caption:
"PR Image eso1824c
Neptune from the VLT and Hubble "
You could choose to be anything, but for some reason you chose to be a condescending asshole - twice.
Maybe you should look in the mirror. My replies were rather tame and to the point. If you don't like being treated this way, don't cast aspersions on others when the failing is yours.