Slashdot Mirror


User: Tablizer

Tablizer's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
29,100
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 29,100

  1. Re:Take the ??? on Fighting Invasive Fish With Forks and Knives · · Score: 1

    Somebody read "Take the" a bit too literally.

  2. Flat is where it's at? on Xiaomi's Next OS Looks Strikingly Similar To iOS · · Score: 1

    I don't get the flat design. We have all that graphics capability now, yet are going back to the 80's GUI look? What's next, pixellation? I like shadows and gradations and metals and wood and marble and textures; screw the flat fad. (Excluded temping jokes about "flat chicks".)

    And get off my lumpy, textured lawn!

    (Well, okay, a Trek NG GUI would be cool...for a while.)

  3. An idea on Fighting Invasive Fish With Forks and Knives · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the meantime, though, his official slogan for the fish is, "Malicious but delicious."

    Hmmm, can we legalize cannibalism of politicians?

  4. The Comma Fish on Fighting Invasive Fish With Forks and Knives · · Score: 5, Funny

    closely related to the silverback semicolon, but watch out for those pointy asterisks

  5. Like my mamma always taught me on Fighting Invasive Fish With Forks and Knives · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...sometimes all you have to do is eat the problem.

  6. Re:In other news... on Windows 8.1 Update Crippling PCs With BSOD, Microsoft Suggests You Roll Back · · Score: 1

    This latest puppy is shittin' all over the carpet.

  7. Re:science and religion agree! on No, a Huge Asteroid Is Not "Set To Wipe Out Life On Earth In 2880" · · Score: 1

    Steal the dude's house late 2016 and say, "you ain't gonna need it, your billboard says so."

  8. Re:For some reason on No, a Huge Asteroid Is Not "Set To Wipe Out Life On Earth In 2880" · · Score: 1

    An Asternado hasn't been ruled out. Nor Sharkroids, which is like Goatse x million

  9. We carried wrong on No, a Huge Asteroid Is Not "Set To Wipe Out Life On Earth In 2880" · · Score: 1

    It's really 2018, sorry for the miscalc. We'll be more careful next time.

  10. Re:Ummm ... Excuse me? on Email Is Not Going Anywhere · · Score: 1
  11. How much? on Reading, Writing, 'Rithmetic, and Blockly · · Score: 1

    "640 test questions ottah be enough for any student" -Gill Bates

  12. Re:Brand new designs on Delays For SC Nuclear Plant Put Pressure On the Industry · · Score: 1

    If it's not a road-tested design, one should factor in delays.

  13. Re:because... GOD! on Why the Universe Didn't Become a Black Hole · · Score: 1

    Where do I mail my Thank You gift to?

  14. Re:Because of the expansion on Why the Universe Didn't Become a Black Hole · · Score: 1

    A survey of what's on TV will confirm that.

  15. New Amazon patent: on Bezos-Owned Washington Post Embeds Amazon Buy-It-Now Buttons Mid-sentence · · Score: 1

    One-Click boo boo

  16. Re: labour cost on Humans Need Not Apply: a Video About the Robot Revolution and Jobs · · Score: 1

    My reality can beat up your reality.

    Where are you getting your worker productivity numbers?

    And lack of savings doesn't mean capital isn't available. Other countries with higher savings rates can lend to us, for example. Where are getting your "dried-up" info? Wealthy people in China are purchasing houses for rental in my neighborhood, for example.

    It is true that many banks are not lending much because they are still paying off the bad loans they made during the Great Mortgage Orgy fad, but we are stuck with the wounds caused by bubbles.

    And bubbles are far older than the US such that you cannot blame them on the Fed Reserve. Capitalism hasn't solved the "business cycle" indigestion problem.

  17. Re: labour cost on Humans Need Not Apply: a Video About the Robot Revolution and Jobs · · Score: 1

    Sorry, you are making stuff up.

  18. Re: The problem with the all robotic workforce id on Humans Need Not Apply: a Video About the Robot Revolution and Jobs · · Score: 1

    I agree it seems we should be seeing the rise of more "indulgence" and customization, but for some reason that is relatively stagnant. The middle class is too pressed to start that trend. We need some kind of force to kickstart both salaries and consumption.

  19. Re: labour cost on Humans Need Not Apply: a Video About the Robot Revolution and Jobs · · Score: 1

    What's so special about NEW companies? Existing companies with similar niches can fill voids if there is a demand. Consumption is the current bottleneck, not ideas nor capital.

  20. 3-to-1 versus 3000-to-1 on The Benefits of Inequality · · Score: 1

    Some inequality is normal and expected. HUGE inequality is risky and ridiculous. Some are so rich they forget how many houses they have.

    Some water is good and necessary. Too much water and you drown.

  21. Re:Management 101 on Entire South Korean Space Programme Shuts Down As Sole Astronaut Quits · · Score: 1

    The IRS lost it

  22. Oh shit! on Murder Suspect Asked Siri Where To Hide a Dead Body · · Score: 5, Funny

    All those old Clippy jokes are becoming reality

  23. Sweet Revenge on Why Hasn't This Asteroid Disintegrated? · · Score: 1

    Let's destroy it by launching dinosaurs at it.

  24. Re:Same as The... on Where are the Flying Cars? (Video; Part One of Two) · · Score: 1

    (4) Technology giving the masses a life of leisure

    It exists. It's called "unemployed and on unemployment". It seems we'll have to seriously consider it "normal" since it does not look like automation and offshoring are shrinking, and no major new source of employment is replacing it.

    The right-wing will balk loudly, though, about "freeloaders". But they balk at ALL change; it's the very definition of "conservative" such that I am not being insulting here (unless reading the dictionary is offensive to some).

  25. Re:Can it be completely automated on Where are the Flying Cars? (Video; Part One of Two) · · Score: 1

    For more populated areas, computer control would probably be necessary. Would it be perfect? No, but it only has to be comparable to road cars in terms safety. People may even accept a bit more general risk to have them.

    If we keep worrying about hackers, we won't progress. The flying cars may need a "panic mode" that basically lets them hover until any navigation-related problem is resolved, perhaps gradually descending to the ground to a spot controlled by the driver (if VTOL, such as Puffin). This sub-system would be separate from the usual control system and based on more hacker-proof and heavily scrutinized code.