In my experience, there was no popping sound. What did you do, blow it up like a balloon before putting it on? I didn't notice when it happened because only the tip was torn, but the rest was still on.
Yeah, if a woman asks you to stop, you gotta stop. They are permitted to revoke consent.
Unfortunately, nothing is ever really that simple. If she says "you should stop" and you say "are you sure? it's already been in..." and she says "uhhhh....okay, fine, we've already gone this far so fuck it", that's not rape. It might be coercion, and if your rape laws are broad enough, that might qualify as rape...but it's not rape in the sense of holding someone down and having your way with them against their will.
I also wonder about the broken condom thing. Really, is that it? I mean, have you ever had a condom break on you? Did you ever notice while fucking that the condom broke...or was it after?
And therein lies the rub. If Julian Assange raped someone, where are the details? You know they would be plastered all over the Internet by everyone who hates him...unless the details are so lame that actually sharing them would take the wind out of the sail you're trying to use. Remember when Spitzer got caught with the prostitute? We had details for that; the hotel, the day of the week, how much the hooker cost...
I'm not saying the guy is innocent or guilty. I'm saying that I reserve judgment because I don't know the details. I imagine the truth is probably embarrassing and shameful, but not malicious as everyone is lead to believe.
I also say that his guilt or innocence is irrelevant when discussing the information from the web site; even if he gets convicted of rape, the Reuters journalists from the Collateral Murder video are still dead.
Safety, yes. I bet the heating issue would be much worse at 7T. A google turns up a few places that have a 7T
Okay, so we are waaay farther from fibers than I thought. Still, though, fascinating little discussion, thanks! I love talking to brain researchers for some strange reason.
Thanks for the info! I guess I should have better qualified "close", but it's not really my field, I just know a guy who knows a guy who... After reading your link, I think I vaguely remember something about the DTI being unable to resolve fibers that cross.
I'm guessing that you do your studies on a 3T...do you know how much better a 7T might be?
What resolution must we reach in order to resolve a individual fibers?
I was just about to come here and mention DTI, but you beat me to it.
I'm not sure if they're down to neuron/axon resolution yet, but I do know they're pretty close. Dr. Walter Schneider at the University of Pittsburgh has created a movie image of the various connections in his brain.
Hm....groped by one individual who will then have to recall the event from memory in order to humiliate me to his co-workers, or scanned by a machine that produces a humiliating picture for all those present in the room to see (and potentially to share with others; even if the machine doesn't save the pictures - and they do - people can still use their camera phone...)
I'll take the groping. It's more embarrassing for the groper to touch me than it is for them to see a picture of me.
But 9/11? People were chomping at the bits to blame Bush for SOMETHING, ANYTHING.
What world are you from? After 9/11, Bush had approval ratings about 3x bigger than when he left office. Nobody blamed him for anything until he invaded Iraq.
She didn't delete anything, and even if she did, it wouldn't matter because the Kernel dude downloaded/screenshot all her email and posted it on the internet. You can still find it with a simple google search.
You like making stuff up, huh? Partisan hacks tend to do that...
If Kernell downloaded all of her email, then why don't we just go read the email about taxes and the Governor of CA? Oh, right. Because you're wrong, Kernell only screenshotted a few emails and grabbed a page of subjects, and that's it.
And if all this information is still widely available, as you say...then did Kernell actually destroy evidence? He only deleted his copy.
You know, Yahoo doesn't need a web browser to compose and send emails. You can use things called Email client applications.
mmmm...salty. I use my phone to handle both my personal email account and my business account, without any issues at all.
And when I log into my Outlook at work, I see my work emails. And when I log into my personal email account, I see my personal emails. Usually, when people log into their email applications, they're doing so in order to look at their email.
And let me guess, Outlook was being used for both personal and government emails, huh? (not that you would know, but you will certainly try to use that as a defense). Does Outlook also suffer from this "hiding the address" that her Blackberry does?
You want to tell me that she had no idea a work email went through her Yahoo? Gimme a break. it might have been an innocent mistake to start, but you know she would have seen it sooner or later. She just didn't care. It was just a stupid sunshine law and she thought she was above abiding by it because it was just so troublesome to do things according to the law.
Regarding "about 15 messages", I would be surprised if she can go all that time sending more than 15 personal emails after each work email before logging in.
Nope! Try again.
There wasn't many cross over emails, and they all were emails to or from people she also had a personal relationship with outside of the governorship.
Stating that there were a limited number of crossover emails based on the tiny amount of information at your disposal is nothing but speculation and inferred opinion.
Either way, I love how you try to minimize the fact that Palin was currently under investigation for this stuff, and she deleted the accounts during this investigation. However, you must like Palin, and your partisan alignment encourages you to defend her. It's okay that she deleted two email accounts while under investigation, even though only one of her accounts was broken into. There was no harm. Limited crossover emails. Besides, FOIA is a stupid law. Government officials shouldn't be accountable for the things they do in their elected capacity.
---
For the record, I'm not trying to get Kernell out of trouble. He broke the law. He needs punished, and you won't find me saying otherwise anywhere. People also need made aware of the attack vector that is your Security Question; to me, THAT is the real story, not whose email got broken into by whom.
Stating the idea that the use was in order to to hide from FOIA requests and such accountability is nothing but speculation and inferred opinion.
And you're right. We will never know. Because Palin destroyed evidence when she deleted her email accounts. Funny how only Kernell is serving time for destroying evidence...
all official investigations into it determined that it was an accidental oversight caused by the complexity of having both accounts on the same phones.
So you're telling me that she never, ever logged into her personal Yahoo email account from a computer? I highly doubt she typed all her personal emails on that tiny Blackberry keyboard. Sooner or later, you know that she logged into Yahoo from a PC. And when she did, she would see plain as day that some of her official government business was being conducted with the wrong email address.
If you think the "same phone" excuse passes the sniff test, then you need to buy yourself some Sudafed.
Exactly. I don't get why everyone gets their panties in a twist over shit like this. If your mouse has five buttons and you only want three...don't use the other two.
I don't see why people struggle so hard with that concept.
I admire you for being a conservative with the courage to support universal health care, but I must say I'm perplexed by the anti-DoE stance.
An employer wants intelligent employees, who have skills like the ability to add and subtract, etc. The DoE helps with that. Consider that the government may spend a thousand dollars educating a young child. Thanks to the education, that young child will grow up to be a more productive worker, perhaps generating an extra fifty thousand dollars worth of economic activity over the course of their life.
Education benefits everyone, even the people who aren't in school.
I'm pretty sure that a guy using a 7-year-old laptop is not the kind of hyper-consumer who tries to e.g. eat enough food to kill himself. But don't let me get in the way of your hyperbole...I know you're just dying to hate some stranger on the Internet.
I find it so disheartening that people will bitch vehemently about taxes without a fucking clue about the truth. I was hoping someone would point out that your return is a portion of the money already taken out of your taxes. I know people well into the "bottom half" of earners who didn't have their taxes set up right and they ended up owing money to the government come tax season.
We don't mean "eat shit out of the garbage" poor. More like "living hand-to-mouth" poor. "Paycheck to Paycheck".
Also, try looking at all the other taxes besides income taxes. Like payroll taxes...that are capped once you earn so much.
And that "bottom half pays no income tax" crap? You're full of it. I'm right around the median income in the US and I most certainly pay a significant income tax.
I believe I have also heard that mis-alignment of the pixels is ultimately what drives the discomfort behind 3D video.
Re:Israel is an interesting exercise in Game Theor
on
Gambling On Bacteria
·
· Score: 1
...are you for real? So the Israeli settlers aren't stealing land from the Palestinians? Putting up a wall around Gaza so that the population has nowhere else to go isn't going to push them out into the sea?
Of course they won't make them "official" goals. In this day and age, no one comes out and says they want to engage in genocide. That would be like saying the US tortures. No, we use "enhanced interrogation techniques". And Israel put up the Gaza blockade and dropped white phosphorus on civilians in "self defense". *eyeroll*
Re:Israel is an interesting exercise in Game Theor
on
Gambling On Bacteria
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
However, if Israel stops and the Palestinians don't, there will be mass casualties on Israel's side.
Say what?
Please, compare the number of Israelis (young or old, male or female) that have died at the hands of Palestinians in the last ten years to the number of Palestinian children that died at the hands of Israelis in the last ten months
Re:Israel is an interesting exercise in Game Theor
on
Gambling On Bacteria
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Not to mention that while peace would be better for Israelis and Palestinians, it is not necessarily better for sub-groups of those populations, such as the Likud party.
In my experience, there was no popping sound. What did you do, blow it up like a balloon before putting it on? I didn't notice when it happened because only the tip was torn, but the rest was still on.
Yeah, if a woman asks you to stop, you gotta stop. They are permitted to revoke consent.
Unfortunately, nothing is ever really that simple. If she says "you should stop" and you say "are you sure? it's already been in..." and she says "uhhhh....okay, fine, we've already gone this far so fuck it", that's not rape. It might be coercion, and if your rape laws are broad enough, that might qualify as rape...but it's not rape in the sense of holding someone down and having your way with them against their will.
I also wonder about the broken condom thing. Really, is that it? I mean, have you ever had a condom break on you? Did you ever notice while fucking that the condom broke...or was it after?
And therein lies the rub. If Julian Assange raped someone, where are the details? You know they would be plastered all over the Internet by everyone who hates him...unless the details are so lame that actually sharing them would take the wind out of the sail you're trying to use. Remember when Spitzer got caught with the prostitute? We had details for that; the hotel, the day of the week, how much the hooker cost...
I'm not saying the guy is innocent or guilty. I'm saying that I reserve judgment because I don't know the details. I imagine the truth is probably embarrassing and shameful, but not malicious as everyone is lead to believe.
I also say that his guilt or innocence is irrelevant when discussing the information from the web site; even if he gets convicted of rape, the Reuters journalists from the Collateral Murder video are still dead.
Safety, yes. I bet the heating issue would be much worse at 7T. A google turns up a few places that have a 7T
Okay, so we are waaay farther from fibers than I thought. Still, though, fascinating little discussion, thanks! I love talking to brain researchers for some strange reason.
Thanks for the info! I guess I should have better qualified "close", but it's not really my field, I just know a guy who knows a guy who... After reading your link, I think I vaguely remember something about the DTI being unable to resolve fibers that cross.
I'm guessing that you do your studies on a 3T...do you know how much better a 7T might be?
What resolution must we reach in order to resolve a individual fibers?
I was just about to come here and mention DTI, but you beat me to it.
I'm not sure if they're down to neuron/axon resolution yet, but I do know they're pretty close. Dr. Walter Schneider at the University of Pittsburgh has created a movie image of the various connections in his brain.
http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schneider/
Hm....groped by one individual who will then have to recall the event from memory in order to humiliate me to his co-workers, or scanned by a machine that produces a humiliating picture for all those present in the room to see (and potentially to share with others; even if the machine doesn't save the pictures - and they do - people can still use their camera phone...)
I'll take the groping. It's more embarrassing for the groper to touch me than it is for them to see a picture of me.
But 9/11? People were chomping at the bits to blame Bush for SOMETHING, ANYTHING.
What world are you from? After 9/11, Bush had approval ratings about 3x bigger than when he left office. Nobody blamed him for anything until he invaded Iraq.
She didn't delete anything, and even if she did, it wouldn't matter because the Kernel dude downloaded/screenshot all her email and posted it on the internet. You can still find it with a simple google search.
You like making stuff up, huh? Partisan hacks tend to do that...
If Kernell downloaded all of her email, then why don't we just go read the email about taxes and the Governor of CA? Oh, right. Because you're wrong, Kernell only screenshotted a few emails and grabbed a page of subjects, and that's it.
And if all this information is still widely available, as you say...then did Kernell actually destroy evidence? He only deleted his copy.
You know, Yahoo doesn't need a web browser to compose and send emails. You can use things called Email client applications.
mmmm...salty. I use my phone to handle both my personal email account and my business account, without any issues at all.
And when I log into my Outlook at work, I see my work emails. And when I log into my personal email account, I see my personal emails. Usually, when people log into their email applications, they're doing so in order to look at their email.
And let me guess, Outlook was being used for both personal and government emails, huh? (not that you would know, but you will certainly try to use that as a defense). Does Outlook also suffer from this "hiding the address" that her Blackberry does?
You want to tell me that she had no idea a work email went through her Yahoo? Gimme a break. it might have been an innocent mistake to start, but you know she would have seen it sooner or later. She just didn't care. It was just a stupid sunshine law and she thought she was above abiding by it because it was just so troublesome to do things according to the law.
Regarding "about 15 messages", I would be surprised if she can go all that time sending more than 15 personal emails after each work email before logging in.
Nope! Try again.
There wasn't many cross over emails, and they all were emails to or from people she also had a personal relationship with outside of the governorship.
Stating that there were a limited number of crossover emails based on the tiny amount of information at your disposal is nothing but speculation and inferred opinion.
Either way, I love how you try to minimize the fact that Palin was currently under investigation for this stuff, and she deleted the accounts during this investigation. However, you must like Palin, and your partisan alignment encourages you to defend her. It's okay that she deleted two email accounts while under investigation, even though only one of her accounts was broken into. There was no harm. Limited crossover emails. Besides, FOIA is a stupid law. Government officials shouldn't be accountable for the things they do in their elected capacity.
---
For the record, I'm not trying to get Kernell out of trouble. He broke the law. He needs punished, and you won't find me saying otherwise anywhere. People also need made aware of the attack vector that is your Security Question; to me, THAT is the real story, not whose email got broken into by whom.
Stating the idea that the use was in order to to hide from FOIA requests and such accountability is nothing but speculation and inferred opinion.
And you're right. We will never know. Because Palin destroyed evidence when she deleted her email accounts. Funny how only Kernell is serving time for destroying evidence...
all official investigations into it determined that it was an accidental oversight caused by the complexity of having both accounts on the same phones.
So you're telling me that she never, ever logged into her personal Yahoo email account from a computer? I highly doubt she typed all her personal emails on that tiny Blackberry keyboard. Sooner or later, you know that she logged into Yahoo from a PC. And when she did, she would see plain as day that some of her official government business was being conducted with the wrong email address.
If you think the "same phone" excuse passes the sniff test, then you need to buy yourself some Sudafed.
Military is the only profession where part of your job description is to give your life for others if necessary
I think there are policemen and fire fighters who would disagree with you.
Exactly. I don't get why everyone gets their panties in a twist over shit like this. If your mouse has five buttons and you only want three...don't use the other two.
I don't see why people struggle so hard with that concept.
Wow, thanks for the info. Did you compile it yourself, or did you get it from a source?
I admire you for being a conservative with the courage to support universal health care, but I must say I'm perplexed by the anti-DoE stance.
An employer wants intelligent employees, who have skills like the ability to add and subtract, etc. The DoE helps with that. Consider that the government may spend a thousand dollars educating a young child. Thanks to the education, that young child will grow up to be a more productive worker, perhaps generating an extra fifty thousand dollars worth of economic activity over the course of their life.
Education benefits everyone, even the people who aren't in school.
If Justice Thomas asked a question to anyone, I think there would be two snowballs in hell rejoicing!
Holy. Fucking. Shit.
I agree with Rush Limbaugh and Antonin Scalia.
I think there's a snowball in hell that's rejoicing right now.
I'm pretty sure that a guy using a 7-year-old laptop is not the kind of hyper-consumer who tries to e.g. eat enough food to kill himself. But don't let me get in the way of your hyperbole...I know you're just dying to hate some stranger on the Internet.
Ha, what company do you work for? "Lead Software Engineers" don't actually write any code. They tell the underlings what code to write.
Sadly, the limit of an engineer as time employed approaches infinity is a manager.
I doubt you're using the right figure for median income.
Look at the title in the GGP. "Nearly half of US households..."
The median household income is just shy of $50k.
Yeah, it's 2010, and every Tuesday my computer bitches about how I have updates waiting to be installed...
I find it so disheartening that people will bitch vehemently about taxes without a fucking clue about the truth. I was hoping someone would point out that your return is a portion of the money already taken out of your taxes. I know people well into the "bottom half" of earners who didn't have their taxes set up right and they ended up owing money to the government come tax season.
We don't mean "eat shit out of the garbage" poor. More like "living hand-to-mouth" poor. "Paycheck to Paycheck".
Also, try looking at all the other taxes besides income taxes. Like payroll taxes...that are capped once you earn so much.
And that "bottom half pays no income tax" crap? You're full of it. I'm right around the median income in the US and I most certainly pay a significant income tax.
I believe I have also heard that mis-alignment of the pixels is ultimately what drives the discomfort behind 3D video.
...are you for real? So the Israeli settlers aren't stealing land from the Palestinians? Putting up a wall around Gaza so that the population has nowhere else to go isn't going to push them out into the sea?
Of course they won't make them "official" goals. In this day and age, no one comes out and says they want to engage in genocide. That would be like saying the US tortures. No, we use "enhanced interrogation techniques". And Israel put up the Gaza blockade and dropped white phosphorus on civilians in "self defense". *eyeroll*
However, if Israel stops and the Palestinians don't, there will be mass casualties on Israel's side.
Say what?
Please, compare the number of Israelis (young or old, male or female) that have died at the hands of Palestinians in the last ten years to the number of Palestinian children that died at the hands of Israelis in the last ten months
Not to mention that while peace would be better for Israelis and Palestinians, it is not necessarily better for sub-groups of those populations, such as the Likud party.