I think the critical thing is that its a learning project. (You're at a university, right?) I'm assuming the graphics arts department wouldn't willingly switch to a clip-art & template program like Print Shop -- or something. They are trying to learn how to create their own layouts and graphics. While they may, in their professional career choose to use such programs, that's not what they're in college for.
Of course, the only times threading is going to benefit you in Apache's model in on Windows (where processes are so damn heavy) or large SMP systems with heavy loads.
The real improvements are things like the cool forwarding that allows you to build simple modules that say -- parse an XML with embedded PHP and pass it off to SSI and then XSLT it.
you know, I don't recall ever seeing an ad on Google. So I went and typed in "flowers" -- there they were. I tried "Linux", "Windows", "Microsoft", and "Internet" --- I didn't see anything for those. The only other time I'd heard of Google ads was the Ximian ad for KDE
the proprietary arrangement of pins (probably patented) on the cartridge interface can easily be considered copyright protection mechanism, or even an encryption scheme. Counting them (and of course using a voltmeter to find out which is which) is obviously a circumvention technique.
I'm sure glad there are more than ten pins, or else we'd all have to get our fingers chopped off as anticircumvention devices.
You didn't read my message, did you? My system is a small one, true. Multiply my system by the thousands of others whose administrators maintain private blacklists - and, I assure you, not all of them are small - and you're talking about a significant chunk of the net.
You didn't read your original message, did you?
So there are a thousand end users who use their own mail server that dead ends into their living room from their local ISP. Not much mail gets routed through them. Yes there are ISPs, and some of them large, that use their own (or other) blackhole lists. But that's not what you were talking about.
Wrong. People can send email from their own systems - as I do - or through their ISP's outgoing email server. That is *not* an open relay, since (if it's properly configured) only relays messages from that ISP's customers.
Wrong. You can send email through your own system (as I do) -- you are in a very small minority. And you can only send email piggybacked on the relays of larger networks (like your ISP.) I said, "Open relays are not the problem", in one sense, that is an exagerration, and should be read,"Open relays are not the biggest problem," but in another sense it is completely accurate the same way saying, "Guns are not the problem, it is the people who misuse them."
Those jokers send their spam through open relays, in an attempt to evade other blacklists. You even note this yourself, though you don't appear to understand it: what, exactly, do you think someone sending mail through someone else's DSL or cable modem is doing if not abusing an open relay?
Yes, they do. Some of them. It's hard to turn down a big chunk of free, anonymous bandwidth. But its easier these days to call up the telco and get your own access on the cheap, and the risk is smaller. Just be sure to use the name "Herbert Spammerton" only once. And try to blackhole all of Verizon, I dare you.
I run my own email server. My ISP has nothing to do with it.
Who are you peered with?
So much talking, so many errors. The fact is that, by eliminating open relays, a significant amount of spam is thrown out. If we didn't have open relays, we'd be much further along in the war on spam.
I was only trying to bring up a counter point, sorry if my original response came across wrong. But you deserve this one.
Open relays are not the problem. Only as much as "bars" are the problem that causes car accidents. It isn't the only problem, maybe not even the largest. While it is a big problem, if you take it away, *the* problem would not go away. I'm not saying you shouldn't treat the symptoms, but you can't ignore the cause.
Relevant to the case at hand, I had to open relaying (only to my local network and work IPs) so that I could use my personal mail server from my home workstation, and from the office. I'm facing the problem of having several friends around the country who would like to use my home mail server -- and I'd like to when I travel. How you you propose doing that without selective open relay? Its already growing into a difficult task to maintain, and it's inconvenient to download putty everytime I travel so I can ssh home. By then, its easier to just read it instead of setting up a temporary mail folder on whoever's computer I'm at. I might as well telnet to port 110 -- which is what I usually end up doing now.
28 years was a lifetime
That's how come they liked to quote the Bible with "threescore and twelve (72)" year lifespan? That's why Ben Franklin lived to (i think) 90?
In Grants day (and for some time thereafter) there was no "life of the author" clause in copyright law. His wife inhereted the manuscript, and granted the publisher right to reproduce it -- a "copyright".
I can't think of any 32767 page document you would want to print out in its entirety. The only other reason to use PDF is to discourage copying or modification. I think the Federal Register chose the wrong format.
the Heirs of the <a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congre<nobr>s<wbr></wbr></nobr> s/2301/genesis.html">Grail Kings</a> are going to be knocking at your door.
uncomfortably close to the classes of nobility that the US Constitution explicitly forbids.
close but not exactly. Because ownership can supposedly be sold to a corporation, theoretically, this has the potential of making said nobility available to the highest bidder (as long as the inside club of brokers, banks, and insurers doesn't want to keep it--or said corporation is not traded publicly)
You are perfectly free under our constitution to purchase majority share in the corporations that lobbied for and bribed to pass the laws you find objectionable, and spend the remaining resources of said corporations to repeal the laws created by their former owners -- provided your actions are in the remaining shareholders' "best interests".
They can also copy the DVD in their Philips DVD burner. <br><br> This problem disappears when you change the brand from "Philips" to "Sony", one of the largest copyright holders in the world. Say the only money to be made on movies was on DVD burners (or video cards, or TVs) the manufacturers would soon start sponsoring people to create content for their devices. The big movie studios started by creating content for their theaters, so people would attend them and pay the exhorbant rates for Raisinettes -- and there's nothing really stopping you from sneaking in your own box!
Slashdot Mirror
it cost them lost sales. If you don't believe that, you probably think the BSA is a bunch of kids camping.
I think the critical thing is that its a learning project. (You're at a university, right?) I'm assuming the graphics arts department wouldn't willingly switch to a clip-art & template program like Print Shop -- or something. They are trying to learn how to create their own layouts and graphics. While they may, in their professional career choose to use such programs, that's not what they're in college for.
so is anything on a rack a "cluster" or "supercluster" ?
yeah, but then you have to install finger to get the full functionality of exchange.
So, if they don't improve anything, they will beat Itanium to market and outperform it.
so they want us all to get goiter?
Sliced bread is cool for creating web-content, but for really cool websites, you should really try torillas!
Of course, the only times threading is going to benefit you in Apache's model in on Windows (where processes are so damn heavy) or large SMP systems with heavy loads.
The real improvements are things like the cool forwarding that allows you to build simple modules that say -- parse an XML with embedded PHP and pass it off to SSI and then XSLT it.
you know, I don't recall ever seeing an ad on Google. So I went and typed in "flowers" -- there they were. I tried "Linux", "Windows", "Microsoft", and "Internet" --- I didn't see anything for those. The only other time I'd heard of Google ads was the Ximian ad for KDE
that the article is hosted on Excite.
Which you may remember was recently bought by (i believe) Infospace, a subsidiary of Microsoft
the proprietary arrangement of pins (probably patented) on the cartridge interface can easily be considered copyright protection mechanism, or even an encryption scheme. Counting them (and of course using a voltmeter to find out which is which) is obviously a circumvention technique.
I'm sure glad there are more than ten pins, or else we'd all have to get our fingers chopped off as anticircumvention devices.
Every sentence of this message is wrong.
See above, below
You didn't read my message, did you? My system is a small one, true. Multiply my system by the thousands of others whose administrators maintain private blacklists - and, I assure you, not all of them are small - and you're talking about a significant chunk of the net.
You didn't read your original message, did you? So there are a thousand end users who use their own mail server that dead ends into their living room from their local ISP. Not much mail gets routed through them. Yes there are ISPs, and some of them large, that use their own (or other) blackhole lists. But that's not what you were talking about.
Wrong. People can send email from their own systems - as I do - or through their ISP's outgoing email server. That is *not* an open relay, since (if it's properly configured) only relays messages from that ISP's customers.
Wrong. You can send email through your own system (as I do) -- you are in a very small minority. And you can only send email piggybacked on the relays of larger networks (like your ISP.) I said, "Open relays are not the problem", in one sense, that is an exagerration, and should be read ,"Open relays are not the biggest problem," but in another sense it is completely accurate the same way saying, "Guns are not the problem, it is the people who misuse them."
Those jokers send their spam through open relays, in an attempt to evade other blacklists. You even note this yourself, though you don't appear to understand it: what, exactly, do you think someone sending mail through someone else's DSL or cable modem is doing if not abusing an open relay?
Yes, they do. Some of them. It's hard to turn down a big chunk of free, anonymous bandwidth. But its easier these days to call up the telco and get your own access on the cheap, and the risk is smaller. Just be sure to use the name "Herbert Spammerton" only once. And try to blackhole all of Verizon, I dare you.
I run my own email server. My ISP has nothing to do with it.
Who are you peered with?
So much talking, so many errors. The fact is that, by eliminating open relays, a significant amount of spam is thrown out. If we didn't have open relays, we'd be much further along in the war on spam.
I was only trying to bring up a counter point, sorry if my original response came across wrong. But you deserve this one.
Open relays are not the problem. Only as much as "bars" are the problem that causes car accidents. It isn't the only problem, maybe not even the largest. While it is a big problem, if you take it away, *the* problem would not go away. I'm not saying you shouldn't treat the symptoms, but you can't ignore the cause.
Relevant to the case at hand, I had to open relaying (only to my local network and work IPs) so that I could use my personal mail server from my home workstation, and from the office. I'm facing the problem of having several friends around the country who would like to use my home mail server -- and I'd like to when I travel. How you you propose doing that without selective open relay? Its already growing into a difficult task to maintain, and it's inconvenient to download putty everytime I travel so I can ssh home. By then, its easier to just read it instead of setting up a temporary mail folder on whoever's computer I'm at. I might as well telnet to port 110 -- which is what I usually end up doing now.
don't always get change, but I was just being pedantic
28 years was a lifetime That's how come they liked to quote the Bible with "threescore and twelve (72)" year lifespan? That's why Ben Franklin lived to (i think) 90?
Wow! This post alone should go a long way to support their case. Turning down money!
In Grants day (and for some time thereafter) there was no "life of the author" clause in copyright law. His wife inhereted the manuscript, and granted the publisher right to reproduce it -- a "copyright".
I can't think of any 32767 page document you would want to print out in its entirety. The only other reason to use PDF is to discourage copying or modification. I think the Federal Register chose the wrong format.
the Heirs of the Grail Kings are going to be knocking at your door.
the Heirs of the <a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congre<nobr>s<wbr></wbr></nobr> s/2301/genesis.html">Grail Kings</a> are going to be knocking at your door.
There is nothing preventing you (or project Gutenberg) from competing directly with Dover.
uncomfortably close to the classes of nobility that the US Constitution explicitly forbids.
close but not exactly. Because ownership can supposedly be sold to a corporation, theoretically, this has the potential of making said nobility available to the highest bidder (as long as the inside club of brokers, banks, and insurers doesn't want to keep it--or said corporation is not traded publicly)
History clearly shows a curve where no IP rights harm society (since few people are motivated to create new IP)
This was known as the renaissance
What do you mean "no legal recourse"?
You are perfectly free under our constitution to purchase majority share in the corporations that lobbied for and bribed to pass the laws you find objectionable, and spend the remaining resources of said corporations to repeal the laws created by their former owners -- provided your actions are in the remaining shareholders' "best interests".
No one's saying we should dress Mr. Lucas up as shitbeard and put a patch over his eye and cut off an appendage. Although...
They can also copy the DVD in their Philips DVD burner.
<br><br>
This problem disappears when you change the brand from "Philips" to "Sony", one of the largest copyright holders in the world. Say the only money to be made on movies was on DVD burners (or video cards, or TVs) the manufacturers would soon start sponsoring people to create content for their devices. The big movie studios started by creating content for their theaters, so people would attend them and pay the exhorbant rates for Raisinettes -- and there's nothing really stopping you from sneaking in your own box!