Slashdot Mirror


Transparent Aluminium

Lynx writes "As the german magazine Spiegel reports, scientists at the Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies have developed a transparent tile made from aluminium oxide pellets baked at 1200C. The material is very hard, and could be used as bulletproof windows." Use the fish.

276 comments

  1. star trek by Fred+Millington · · Score: 1, Funny

    didnt scotty make this in one of the Star Trek films? I want some for my PC case.

    1. Re:star trek by foonarf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. "How do we know he didn't invent the bloody thing." Looks like it only took the guy 18 years to figure out the "dynamics" of it. Now all we need is dilithium crystals, isolinear chips, and fusion reactors.

    2. Re:star trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      A whale of an idea!

    3. Re:star trek by SonofRage · · Score: 0

      umm, we already have fusion reactors, how do you think we get nuclear power? Maybe you mean antimatter engines?

    4. Re:star trek by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Really? Where? I ask you this question to have your advice.
      After all, every commercial nuke plant that I'm aware of is based around a FISSION reactor.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    5. Re:star trek by Lazarus+Short · · Score: 1
      how do you think we get nuclear power?


      That would be Fission.

      --
      The most valuable commodity I know of is information. - Michael Douglas as Gordon Gekko, Wall Street
    6. Re:star trek by den_erpel · · Score: 1

      We have fission reactors, not fusion reactors.
      AFAIK are the fusion reators on te brink of being put to commercial use in Europe...
      Weren't they building a first test reactor that would produce more fusion energy than it was consuming for the startup?

      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    7. Re:star trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Those things sound great. However with all the current genetic research going on the next item will likely be Khan.:(

    8. Re:star trek by SonofRage · · Score: 1

      yeah I realized it after I clicked submit. Thats what I get for reading /. at 4 in the morning

    9. Re:star trek by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      No problem...and I know the feeling.
      One feature I'd kill for is the ability to delete my posts as desired. That, or a breathalyzer built into my computer.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    10. Re:star trek by a+random+streaker · · Score: 1

      FUSION devices DO exist, and give out more energy than they put in. They just have a lot of engineering and science ahead of them before they become possible for industrial strength output.

      --
      "All representatives are busy. The estimated hold time is one..hundred..sixty..four..minutes." Detroit Edison, 02/01/02
    11. Re:star trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was liquid aluminum.

    12. Re:star trek by Miragejp · · Score: 0
      Yes they DO exist, but they don't need any engineering or science work before they produce industrial strength output. Fusion reactors ALREADY have industrial strength output - they are called stars...

      --
      In general, modern problems have medieval solutions...
    13. Re:star trek by kefoo · · Score: 0

      Getting off topic, but... Commercial fusion is still a ways off, but we're getting there, albeit slowly. Check out this article from last fall about it. Last I heard the longest self sustaining, controlled reaction lasted a few seconds.

    14. Re:star trek by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      "umm, we already have fusion reactors, how do you think we get nuclear power?"

      I think we get nuclear power from Nuclear FISSION.

    15. Re:star trek by fitten · · Score: 1

      No, it was Transparent Aluminium. Star Trek IV.

    16. Re:star trek by RetsamYthgimla · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen bombs have industrial strength output from fusion reactions. Oh yeah, but the reactions last a few microseconds at most, not exactly very useful.

    17. Re:star trek by Jay+Bratcher · · Score: 1

      No, it was Transparent Aluminium.

      That was only in the British version. This kind of thing happens when your language splits, which is why we have colors instead of colours.

    18. Re:star trek by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Redundant? This is the first post of its kind.

    19. Re:star trek by fataugie · · Score: 0, Troll

      Now how the fuck can someone mod this as redudant when this is the first fucking post?

      BTW, yes, star trek 4 when they were trying to bring the whales back (no, not those big jumbo momma's at the salad bar) to the 23rd century.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    20. Re:star trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rotf. obviously the moderators don't get the joke. i do.

    21. Re:star trek by mpforjc · · Score: 1

      He even used a MAC plus/SE to enter the formulas Say "Keyboards!" while rolling your tongue. ================== "Remember, Tuesday is Soylent Green day!"

    22. Re:star trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your definition of "useful"

    23. Re:star trek by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      How can the first post be redundant?!?
      You moderating nitwits!

      Magius_AR

    24. Re:star trek by thelizman · · Score: 1

      REDUNDANT!?

      Y'all better be damned sure that moderater is gonna pay when I metamoderate today...

    25. Re:star trek by NGTV13 · · Score: 0

      Computer, hello computer...
      *Gets handed mouse*
      *talks into mouse*
      "Hello computer"
      "Use the keyboard"
      "Oh, how quaint..."

      Just thoughted it needed to be said

      --
      I'm not saying that god doesn't exist, merely that he is not necessary - hawking
    26. Re:star trek by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      They produce more energy than they consume? I find this hard to believe. Last time I checked, the First Law of Thermodynamics ruled this impossible.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    27. Re:star trek by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      They produce more energy than they consume? I find this hard to believe.

      Aww, give him a break. You know what he meant. He meant that the output energy is greater than the amount of direct energy put in. Never mind the fact that most of the output energy is obtained by consuming materials with stored energy.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    28. Re:star trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A rather grey issue to be going into and the ammusment of many a flame war ;D

  2. Wow. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I didn't really think that they would actualy do it. I hope this isn't the german version of april fools :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Wow. by SamBeckett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Jesus christ dude how many times a story do you post??

  3. otey oten oten day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    otey oten day - o
    otey oten oten day
    fattening up our tape - worms!

  4. Scotty finally came through! by ender81b · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ha! That guy finally figured out those equations Scotty gave to him back in Star Trek IV! Another technological breakthough thanks to good 'ol Scotty.

    1. Re:Scotty finally came through! by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ay, but how do we know he didn't invent the thing?

      --
      >
    2. Re:Scotty finally came through! by rochlin · · Score: 1

      I always kind of wondered... Why did Scotty even need the aluminum to be transparent? They could've carried the whale in a regular aluminum tank. :)

    3. Re:Scotty finally came through! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
      I always kind of wondered... Why did Scotty even need the aluminum to be transparent? They could've carried the whale in a regular
      aluminum tank. :)


      I'm curious: did you realize this right away, or did it take you a few years after seeing the film fresh and new on the big screen? I know in my case, it was, like a whole decade later that I stopped and thought, "Heyyyy. Now hold on a moment!"

      Perhaps I'm generalizing here, but I'll ask the question as though I weren't:

      "Why is it that this sort of thing never seems so apparent at the time? Why are films so much more alive and real-seeming when they first come out? Do new films have a shelf-life or something? Is it more than just color which fades?"


      -Fantastic Lad

    4. Re:Scotty finally came through! by elh102 · · Score: 1
      I always kind of wondered... Why did Scotty even need the aluminum to be transparent? They could've carried the whale in a regular aluminum tank. :)

      You missed the point. Scotty needed to acquire large plexiglass panels from that factory manager guy (Scotty: "How thick would one of your panels have to be to withstand the pressure of ...[whatever numbers he quoted]?" factory guy: "That's easy, 6 inches. We carry stuff that big in stock." Scotty: "Aye, I noticed."). Unfortunately, having freshly arrived from the 23rd Century, the Enterprise crew was a little short on cash. Scotty gave the guy the formula for transparent aluminum in exchange for the plexiglass panels (Scotty: "Is it worth something to ya, laddy, or shall I just punch up clear?")

    5. Re:Scotty finally came through! by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      He did not USE the transperant aluminum.

      He used 4" (3"?) plexiglass. The deal was he would give the manufacturer the formula in exchange for the plexiglass.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    6. Re:Scotty finally came through! by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      What the guy is saying, is why did it have to be transparant at all (i.e., why plexigless). This wasn't a wale show, they just needed to carry them on the ship for like a half hour.

    7. Re:Scotty finally came through! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was always under the impression that transparent aluminium was inherently stronger than regular aluminium. That the 6" plexiglass was too thick, so Scotty gave him the formula in exchange for the first batch of trans. alum. panels off the line.

      But that would take alot of time. Your explaination makes more sense.

    8. Re:Scotty finally came through! by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      No no... What the guy is saying, is why did it have to be transparant at all (i.e., why plexigless). This wasn't a wale show, they just needed to carry them on the ship for like a half hour.

    9. Re:Scotty finally came through! by crotherm · · Score: 1

      Scotty did not need to use the transparent aluminum, he used the formula as barter to get the plexiglass to house the whale.

      That said, he still could have used an opaque material instead of the plexiglass.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    10. Re:Scotty finally came through! by Noel · · Score: 1

      Why did it have to be transparent? Because Scotty saying, "Admirral, therre be whales herre!" is so much better than Spock saying, "Transport completed, Admiral." ;-P

    11. Re:Scotty finally came through! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Scotty did not need to use the transparent aluminum, he used the formula as barter to get the plexiglass to house the whale.

      Ah. But of course! And transparent = 'looks good on camera'. Snappy problem solving there.

      Now that's film making!


      -Fantastic Lad --Give me ten years and I'm sure I'll remember it bigger, faster, better!

    12. Re:Scotty finally came through! by jamesmartinluther · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they did it using a mac plus and about 100 keystrokes?

    13. Re:Scotty finally came through! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny


      nerd alert.
      he traded the formula for transparent alumium, for plexiglass.
      they used plexiglass for the tank.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Scotty finally came through! by johnnie · · Score: 1

      This wasn't a wale[sic] show,

      uh, yeah, it was. it's a MOVIE!!!!

      ;)

      --
      Don't ask. Go see.
  5. Combine some transparent aluminum... by ARColeslaw · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...with some transparent concrete to build a transparent house! Now people who want to live in a "glass" house don't have to worry about throwing things at each other! Oh, but they still have to worry about being naked...

    --
    ...would you like coleslaw with that?
    1. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by sxpert · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, but they still have to worry about being naked...

      hehe, who cares... Clothes have not been invented to hide the body, but to keep warm.

      The concept of hiding the body comes from the moral ineptness of some idiotic religious nuts during the dark ages

    2. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by a+random+streaker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > Oh, but they still have to worry about being naked...

      That's what transparent clothes are for. Duh!

      --
      "All representatives are busy. The estimated hold time is one..hundred..sixty..four..minutes." Detroit Edison, 02/01/02
    3. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by llamalicious · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think you've done it.
      You finally found something where Taco's signature applies.

      Pants are optional, but recommended for you

    4. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by Marty200 · · Score: 1

      >The concept of hiding the body comes from the moral ineptness of some idiotic religious nuts during the dark ages

      But now it works to hide the ugly people from sight.
      MG

      --

      Randomly distributing Karma whenever possible.

    5. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >The concept of hiding the body comes from the moral ineptness of some idiotic religious nuts during the dark ages

      So is that why clothes weren't invented until 1200 A.D.?

    6. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by namespan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The concept of hiding the body comes from the moral ineptness of some idiotic religious nuts during the dark ages

      Genesis 4:6-7

      "And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
      And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves and made themselves aprons"

      You don't have to accept this account as history to realize that at the very least, semitic societies had some sort of concept of hiding the body thousands of years back. Copies of Genesis predate the idiotic religious nuts of the dark ages by at least 2 millenia. There have probably been societies that felt it was good to hide the body from view for as long.

      Not to mention covering the body for purposes other than warmth OR morality: protection from sun or sand or other dangerous substances, check against physical blows, adornment and status, disguise. Or for that matter, enticement -- if nakedness were the ultimate turn-on, Victoria's Secret wouldn't do such good business. I'm sure Victoria wasn't the first one to catch on.

      Anyway, I'm overesponding, but the point is, there are lots of reasons for cloths, and most all of them are probably older than western society.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    7. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now people who want to live in a "glass" house don't have to worry about throwing things at each other!

      People in glass houses shouldn't get stoned.

    8. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      howbout putting some of this in the space station. big transparent windows.
      eh?

    9. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by brad3378 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend using aluminum windows unless the added safety is a factor. Aluminum is an excellent conductor, therefore, even with modern multipaned gas filled windows, the thermal conductivity would likely be so high that significant heat loss would occur. The opposite is true in the Summer: You'll have to use a lot more energy to run your air conditioner.

      Even the safety factor may not be a good argument. In automobiles, side windows are made from a "safety glass" designed to completely shatter rather than crack like a windshield. Then again, if people knew that their windshields were made from aluminum, maybe they would start wearing their seatbelts! That would definitely be a good safety argument.

      --

    10. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

      Your argument is to quote from Genesis. Amazing! You may have shown the date was wrong but you've done nothing to show that shame from nakedness wasn't invented by religious nuts.

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    11. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      It seems to me all that he was doing was to try to prove the date was wrong. He also offers several alternate reasons as to why wearing clothes may have become the societal norm.
      It seems to me the nut here may be yourself.

    12. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by namespan · · Score: 2

      Your argument is to quote from Genesis. Amazing! You may have shown the date was wrong but you've done nothing to show that shame from nakedness wasn't invented by religious nuts.

      You know, I've actually been WAITING for someone to make a stupid comment like this.

      MY comment was meant to refute two ideas contained in the parent post:

      1) clothing was adopted solely because of "moral" concerns
      2) this was done in the middle ages

      I'd say my comment did both conclusively. #2 first and foremost -- unhealth attitudes about the human body may have been reperpetrated and reinforced then, but the use of clothing as a "moral shield" most certainly didn't first come about then.

      #1 wasn't demonstrated conclusively -- how do I KNOW people came up with clothes for reasons like protection and ceremony and adornment and disguise? I don't. I just know people use it for that today, across nearly every society. It stands to reason that people adopted clothing for a variety of reasons a long time ago.

      So my post did exactly what it claimed to do. Yours is a Red Herring.

      Now if you WANT to address issues about whether all shame from nakedness is due to religious influences, and whether religious people are nuts, specifically, those who wrote Genesis, that'd be a whole 'nother post....

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    13. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2
      H-I-D-I-N-G spells hiding


      Read the original post and then come back and discuss. He says quite specifically hiding as opposed to simply wearing. Hiding is completely different to wearing clothes for warmth, or protection or status.

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    14. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by namespan · · Score: 1

      He says quite specifically hiding as opposed to simply wearing.

      And that's true, so I guess the poster and I do not disagree on that.

      Still doesn't change the fact that the thrust of MY post is that "hiding" the body is quite clearly not a concept that originated in the dark ages. Something I also state "quite specifically."

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    15. Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

      the thrust of MY post is that "hiding" the body is quite clearly not a concept that originated in the dark ages

      Quite right. It's close to being a cultural invariant with almost everyone in the world being subject to at least one taboo about revealing certain body parts. And it's all a lot more interesting than transparent alumin(i)um even if it's off topic.
      --
      -- SIGFPE
  6. Wait.... by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry. I should have read the blurb more carefully.

    This isn't transparent aluminum; this is a transparent aluminum oxide. That is just not the same thing as aluminum anymore then water is Hydrogen gas, or table salt is the same thing as Sodium metal or Chlorine gas (both very harmful chemicals, sodium can explode when it comes in contact with water, and Chlorine can kill you in a few breaths, yet we eat salt all the time)

    And secondly we have known about aluminum based compounds for a long time, in fact, longer then we have known about Aluminum or even about elements in general. Alum, the compound from which aluminum gets it's name (and which we extract aluminum from) has been known to man for ages and is, in fact, transparent.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Wait.... by thumbtack · · Score: 1

      Aw shucks...and I was on my way over to ThinkGeek to see if there were pc cases available yet...I looked at the clear acrylic cases as while back on another site, but didn't think they could handle the heat from the hard drive, video card and processor. Sorry my PC just melted....

    2. Re:Wait.... by cperciva · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      we eat salt all the time

      But, of course, that hasn't stopped radical environmentalists from proposing a ban on "all use of compounds containing chlorine".

      Time to circulate the "ban DHMO" petition again, I think.

    3. Re:Wait.... by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Transparent aluminium oxide has been known for a very long time, naturally it's known as Corundum, and red varieties are called Ruby and other colours (not just blue) are called Sapphires.

      And artificial transparent rubies and sapphires have been made for around 100 years - so apart from maybe a new fabrication process there isn't really anything new in this story!

      Jolyon

      ps. Alum isn't used as an ore of aluminium - there isn't enough of it found naturally, the ore of aluminium is Bauxite, a mixture of aluminium oxides and hydroxides.

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    4. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or how the three constituant parts of aspertame are rather toxic by themselves but are perfectly safe when joined together in the form seen in all of our artificial sweetners.

      Like salt, aspartame requires extreme conditions to break down into its toxic constituent parts. In liquid, aspartame must be exposed to temperatures above 80 F for a few minutes before breaking down.

      Aspartame, brought to you by your friends at Monsanto. Oh yes. And they fudged studies to get it passed by the FDA, and got caught. Right when they were gonna get their asses handed to them, some politicians swooped down and pulled them from the fire, and paved the way for widespread use of the sweetner.

      The timeframe of the fudged Monsanto studies on aspartame was in the early 70's, which coincides with a time inhistory when they knew they were poisoning an entire town with PCB's and other toxic materials.

      So keep glurping down that Monsanto Sweetner. And if you notice off-taste, perhaps your can of whatever, don't worry that's just the methanol.

    5. Re:Wait.... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah but that's ionic chloride. A "ban on all use of compounds containing chlorine" would not include chloride salts or inorganic chlorine like bleach. It would be more like a ban on covalent bonds between carbon and chlorine, which rarely if ever occur in nature and are stable enough to persist for centuries.

    6. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been a science minded person my entire life. When I hear one theory or another, I sit down and and check it out for myself. Well let me just say that I was not pleased with what I found when I did some digging that started at the Nutrasweet thing.

      You wanna shake up your thinking on all the studies you hear on the radio? Check out some of the links on this page that is maintained by Monsanto's propaganda/research arm:

      http://www.aspartame.org

      Now, if look around on those links, you'll see that all of these "non-profit" and "informational" groups are either owned, or funded by Monsanto! And there's some big names, household names one would trust on instinct. I never had any idea the scope of the propoganda these companies employ. Scares the shit out of me. The American Medical Association's web page...Read some of the "studies" they've carried out. They promte every fucking controversial chemical that has come about for the past 2 decades.

      And it doesn't stop there. Don't take my word for it. Go to aspartame.org, a Monsanto sponsored site. Follow the links. And be prepared to shit a brick at how profoundly corrupt our bastions of medical research have become.

    7. Re:Wait.... by onnellinen · · Score: 2, Funny

      We should also ban dihydrogen oxide. It corrosive and can cause accidents in solid form.

      --

      Graceland tour guide: "Elvis has the left building".

    8. Re:Wait.... by reemul · · Score: 2

      You forgot to mention that it is a major component of acid rain, can be lethal if inhaled, and that studies have shown that more than 95% of all cancer victims have ingested significant quantities of it before being diagnosed. Clearly, something needs to be done. ;)

      Note for the folks that don't get what dihydrogen monoxide (the silent killer!) is - in the words of the immoral Foghorn Leghorn "That's a joke, son."

      --
      You're just jealous 'cuz the voices talk to *me*
    9. Re:Wait.... by a+random+streaker · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on! I'm a libertarian, so I'll defend the right of people to have dangerous things, especially since dangerous only to themselves.

      Think of the good side: doctors recommend dihidrogen monoxide to prevent pharangeal adhesion of analgesics, you obtuse piece of porcine flotsam.

      --
      "All representatives are busy. The estimated hold time is one..hundred..sixty..four..minutes." Detroit Edison, 02/01/02
    10. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is killing my Type II, Adult-Onset, Non-Insulen Dependent Diabetic body faster than sugar?

    11. Re:Wait.... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      But, of course, that hasn't stopped radical environmentalists from proposing a ban on "all use of compounds containing chlorine".

      Dont confuse the common language, used to make a quick/basic argument, with the knowledge (in whole) of 'radical environmentalists'. Please, spare the propaganda for some other group. Framing advocates first as 'radical environmentalists', then maligning their effort with that kind of condescension is insulting. (at best)

      Radical Pollution Apologists can sit and snigger about the environmentalists all they please, but in reality, these people are playing a Grade8 Debate game of insult/shift/confuse (FUD).

      Most Radical Environmentalists (like myself) can see through your shit like transparent Al. A rebuttal of ignorance and hyperbole may work well with rednecks and McCarthy-ites
      POPs explained

    12. Re:Wait.... by Psion · · Score: 1

      So...are you claiming that no environmentalists are radical? Sounds to me like the propaganda goes both ways here.

    13. Re:Wait.... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ...no, thats not what im saying.

      What i am saying is that people use words like 'radical' and other (leftist, commie, anarchist, eco-warrior) propaganda-laden vocabulary to frame and shift a discussion.

      these words are used when people want a pavlovian(sp?) response.

      You can shift an otherwise neutral-recipient of information to a position where (s)he would become sceptical/fearfull/against the idea simply by inserting certain words in reference to the argument.

      For example, "Radical environmentalists want to curb pollution", instantly the idea of 'curbing pollution' is a product of a "radical" group. Your not a Radical are you? Radicals are those crazy Anarchists who want chaos and lawlessness, didnt you see them on the Television last night spray-painting advertisments from Monsanto. Geeze, you'd think they have something against people making a living, you know, just doing business. I bet their godless commies . No one has the right to stop me from going to church! And Certainly not those Radicals with their CRAZY IDEAS ABOUT BUSINESS/RELIGION/POLLUTION .

      These seemingly innocuous words are used by adept people to taint conversations. Im trying to make a point about propaganda and language.

      ...but in reality, lots of Environmentalists could rightly be considered Radical - like myself ;)

    14. Re:Wait.... by Veramocor · · Score: 1

      Do you actually think you are ever seeing Aluminum. Thats right boys and girls aluminum in atmospheric conditions is always coated by a layer of AL2O3. Aluminum will be oxidized as soon as it hits air. This is the basis for corrosion.

      But Veramocor, when Iron oxidizes and forms rust it'll continue to corrode. If aluminum is oxidizing in atmospheric conditions why doesn't it degrade? Because the aluminum oxide forms a protective barrier which prevents the diffusion of oxygen to the surface of non-oxidized aluminum. Iron oxides do not.

      This is also the basis for stainless steels which have a high Chromium content. Chromium reacts with oxygen to form stable chromium oxidesand thus prevents corrosion.

      Ver amo cor

      --
      Veramocor
    15. Re:Wait.... by fataugie · · Score: 1
      You forgot to mention that it is a major component of acid rain, can be lethal if inhaled, and that studies have shown that more than 95% of all cancer victims have ingested significant quantities of it before being diagnosed.


      And what you forgot is that 100% of people that inhale significant quantities of H2O drown.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    16. Re:Wait.... by citizenx · · Score: 1

      You can shift an otherwise neutral-recipient of information to a position where (s)he would become sceptical fnord/fearfull fnord/against the idea simply by inserting certain words fnord in reference to the argument fnord fnord.

      I don't know what fnord you fnord fnord fnord could be talking about.

    17. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what you forgot is that 100% of people that inhale significant quantities of H2O drown

      Haven't seen the original petition/rant/joke, but that seems backwards to me - lots of people with lungs full of Dihydrogen Monoxide have been pulled out and survived, but certainly many of the people who drowned (i.e. 100%) were found to have inhaled significant quantities of dihydrogen monoxide.

    18. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obtuse piece of porcine flotsam

      Not bad.... But how about "you obtuse porcine canid"?

      That way you can call someone a stupid pig-dog!

    19. Re:Wait.... by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Well, I would say then that they did NOT inhale significant enough quantities of H20. I guess it's how you define significant ;-)

      --

      WTF? Over?

    20. Re:Wait.... by Psion · · Score: 1

      Well, just make sure you pay attention to the same propaganda-laden vocabulary as it frames and shifts a discussion when it comes from groups like Greenpeace.

      But why do you make such an effort to deflect biased vocabulary and then turn around and admit that lots of Environmentalists and yourself could rightly be considered Radical?

    21. Re:Wait.... by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      We should also ban dihydrogen oxide. It corrosive and can cause accidents in solid form.

      I'll have you know that I am immune. In fact I wallow in it every morning!

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    22. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, maybe not. Look at it this way. Yoiu know all those studies that are constantly being touted on radio and television,"Studies show bla bla bla" ? You'd think those studies would be double blind, unbiased, and all that. Shit, these "scientists" are just an extension of the chemical industries marketing arms. It's sickening and evil. *spit* *spit* *spit*

      At least you know what sugar is. With aspartame, you've got Monsanto who paid scientists to lie to the FDA about the safety aspartame. Monsanto lying to the FDA about aspartame is not some sort of conspiracy theory, this is historical fact. And ever since, it's been one lie after another and the same kind of bullshit "science" .

      You just wait. In the next few years there's gonna by an epic shitstorm with the aspartame science/propoganda machine at the very center.

    23. Re:Wait.... by ahde · · Score: 2

      so they want us all to get goiter?

    24. Re:Wait.... by aongus · · Score: 1

      Well, if you want to get pedantic, it should actually be dihydrogen monoxide. (And I haven't had this good of a laugh in a long time.)

      BTW, I think you'll find Scotty in Golden Gate Park. If you hurry.

    25. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't transparent aluminum; this is a transparent aluminum oxide. That is just not the same thing as aluminum anymore then water is Hydrogen gas, or table salt is the same thing as Sodium metal or Chlorine gas (both very harmful chemicals, sodium can explode when it comes in contact with water, and Chlorine can kill you in a few breaths, yet we eat salt all the time)

      And secondly we have known about aluminum based compounds for a long time, in fact, longer then we have known about Aluminum or even about elements in general. Alum, the compound from which aluminum gets it's name (and which we extract aluminum from) has been known to man for ages and is, in fact, transparent.


      yes but this material is transparent AND 3X harder than steel!

    26. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the three constituant parts of aspertame are rather toxic by themselves but are perfectly safe when joined together

      Yeah, tell that to all those rats that got cancer from it.

    27. Re:Wait.... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Environmentalists and yourself could rightly be considered Radical

      ..because being Radical is not inherently bad. But when you overload words like "Radical" people become fearfull.

      "Radical" in a political sense means to have a new or very-different opinion. Why is this bad or wrong? Its not, but most people are afraid of "Radical" ideas - once they are labeled such.

      I have radical ideas about what our environmental policies should be - they are Valid, Correct and Necessary.**

      **the reason i made this statement is to illustrate a point, why WOULDNT my "radical" ideas be "Valid, Correct and Necessary"? It could be true - you dont know my ideas, but I bet you let out a sigh when i said that...

      ...am i getting my point across? im not terribly sure im making any sense, it is a very difficult thing for me to explain...

    28. Re:Wait.... by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Since we're on a roll, we also want to break it to everyone that Santa Claus isn't real either.

    29. Re:Wait.... by FrozenSentry · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm glad somebody else realized that its actually not metallic at all. Al2O3 is a ceramic and nearly every single crystaline ceramic is transparent when it's fully dense and a single crystal. Transparent aluminum Oxide isn't actually new at all, just manufacturing it is. I'm pretty sure most of you have heard of garnets, well they just happen to be Aluminum Oxide with around a 1ppm impurity level (I think of chromium oxide) theres actually a few precious stones made out of aluminum oxide. The real thing thats notable is that they were able to manufacture this fully dense single crystal structure, which is very hard to do sometimes.

  7. transparent jewels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that like rubies?

  8. Minor correction by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The first sentance of the second paragraph should read: "And secondly we have known about aluminum based transparent compounds for a long time"

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  9. Followup by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    Btw, The artical indicates that this material is 3 times as strong as steal, making it far stronger then pure, regular, opaque, Aluminum metal.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Followup by ajmarks · · Score: 1

      Actually the article says (thanks babelfish!):
      "A 10 times 10 centimeters large plate (strength: only about 400 gram weigh, are however three times harder 1.0 cm as hardened steel)."

      If I'm groking this correctly, it means that a 10cm diameter, 400gm disk of transparent aluminum oxide is 3 times as strong as 1cm thick steel. What this does not tell us is the disk's thickness. For all we know, this disk could be 6cm thick. Or it could be a mere .5cm, which would be great. My point is that this article doesn't provide sufficient information to judge this material.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
    2. Re:Followup by Hal-9001 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This material is nothing new: I covered the distinction between alumina and aluminum in this comment attached to the transparent concrete article that speculated about transparent aluminum. Bottom line is that alumina (Al2O3) and aluminum (Al) are totally different materials, so naturally they have different properties such as hardness, stiffness, transparency, etc. Alumina is what sapphires and rubies are made of. Pure alumina is clear, but the addition of color centers like chromium ions results in the color of gemstone rubies and sapphires. A search for sapphire conformal optics will show you that making windows out of sapphire for military applications is nothing new. Just about the only thing that might be new is how they make the sapphire, but the article does not provide any details about that. Yes, sapphire is cool stuff, but it's not some magical new material.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    3. Re:Followup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He even spelled "aluminium" wrongly.

    4. Re:Followup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The artical indicates that this material is 3 times as strong as steal,

      Great! Keeps the theives out of the house. Unless you're talking about the stronger-than-average theif.

    5. Re:Followup by bulwynkl · · Score: 1

      I have to say I agree. "Nothing to see here, move along." (sorry, bad pun alert)

      Basically, it's all about grain boundaries, relative refractive indicies and strength versus toughness. alumina is very strong (able to resist force), but not neccessarily very tough (able to survive damage). The classic Mat eng way to toughen AND strengthen a material is to reduce the grain size. Make the grain size too small to interact with visible light ( 0.4 microns) and you have transparent materials. Well, alright, sometimes. Other things get in the way too, but basically anything that is translucent as large relatively pure cryatals will also be clear as a super fine crystalline solid. Bulk properties and surface properties also count. Which is why it won't work with Al metal.
      translucent alumina tubing (as used in furnaces) has been around for a long time. - in that case it is usually quite large xrystals.
      The principal described for transparent concrete seems basically the same. Also, glass-ceramics (Dow Arcosteel (?)) is dasically the same principal. I wonder how they are doing it? Are there any Al2O3 rich glasses that could be converted to Al2O3 by heat treatment? Has anyone tried this with Geopolymer?

    6. Re:Followup by esonik · · Score: 1

      The reason why Al metal (and every other metal too) is not transparent is the free electrons: they screen the electric field of light for frequencies below the metals' plasma frequency (which is high due to the high electron density). For Al the plasma frequency is in the far UV range at a wavelength of 15nm (visible light has 400..800nm), so radiation with wavelengths below 15nm is reflected (notice shiny appearance of metal surfaces).
      OTOH, you can make translucent metal coatings, if the metal film thickness is smaller than the wavelength to transmit.

  10. It depends. by autopr0n · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On how much I have to say.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:It depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On how much I have to say."

      So how come Mr. Pornography Distributor here suddenly gets modded up to 2 without contributing anything useful?

  11. Re:Scotty by ThePilgrim · · Score: 2

    No. He just showed them the molecula structure. He didn't tell them how to manufacture it.

    --
    Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
  12. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by armb · · Score: 5, Informative

    > this material is 3 times as strong as steal,

    No, it says it is three times as _hard_ as hardened steel, which isn't the same thing (though they are related). Considering that corundum (i.e. ruby, sapphire) is made of aluminium oxide, that isn't that surprising.

    Forming that hard material into tiles of unspecified but obviously reasonable toughness and strenth while keeping it transparent is the impressive bit.

    --
    rant
  13. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    This would be useful for windows of buses and trains in areas where they tend to get vandalized.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  14. KITH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:KITH by Kirkoff · · Score: 2

      As bad as it is to reply to something so far off topic (well the thread thereof) that is one of my favorite KITH sketches.

      --Josh

      --
      There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
  15. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by armb · · Score: 5, Funny

    P.S. Considering the number of people who are confused about the difference between silicon and silicone, it's not surprising some can't tell the difference between aluminium and alumina (aluminium oxide).

    (Aluminum/aluminium is just US/international spelling. Looking at the original German article it uses "Aluminiumoxid" where the fish translation has alumina.)

    --
    rant
  16. Re:Scotty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    incompetence

  17. Tranceparent house by flame_ox · · Score: 1

    I saw tranceparent house at TV news program in Japan. (Sorry I've forgotten where the house is.)
    A young woman lives in it.
    The designer of that house said "This is art", but I don't think so.

    Some neighbors were watching to naked girl...

    1. Re:Tranceparent house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be much more severely bothered by the loss of privacy in general, i.e. the fact that people could always see what I was doing, than the fact that people could see me naked.

      I simply can't understand how some people don't care about privacy "because they have nothing to hide"; even if all I did was normal, everyday stuff, I'd be bothered and overly self-conscious if someone could see what I was doing and when, or even such trivial details like what TV shows I watch...

  18. Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    That is so amazing, I didn't know.

    What are the advantages over toughened glass ? .... oooh I wonder what sunglasses made of blue sapphire would be like ?

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't live in Watts.

    2. Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by shogun · · Score: 2

      oooh I wonder what sunglasses made of blue sapphire would be like ?

      Expensive.

    3. Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by 1010011010 · · Score: 2


      Heavy.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    4. Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by mattr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just buy a space shuttle. They all come with them included.

      You can actually buy sapphire windows at least up to 15cm square some places I found on the net.. supermarket scanners also sometimes have sapphire windows apparently.

      The watchglass of my Rolex is a sapphire crystal. Looks cool, doesn't scratch. This page has info about synthetic sapphire watchglasses. It says Seiko coats mineral glass with synthetic sapphire (sapphlex they call it) to make it hard.

    5. Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by jjeffries · · Score: 2

      Edmund Optics will sell you sapphire windows, along with tons of other cool stuff. Ball lenses are pretty neat, too.

    6. Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy watches with the glass part made of saphire. They're more expensive, but not solely due to the cost of saphire; they're much nicer and higher quality watches in general.

    7. Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the advantage being that they are more scratch proof because of the hardness of Sapphire.

  19. Re:Widest post yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    klerck? charleston, south carolina?

  20. and the engineers all over the world... by Kibo · · Score: 5, Informative

    let out a giant yawn.

    Alumina being transparent or strong is hardly new. Although the bullet proof glass thing is pretty funny. Alumina is not tough, it may be strong, and even greatly stronger than steel should we be talking about specific strength, but it is not tough at all. And I don't know about you, but the last thing I was between me and a bullet is a sheet of something that will shatter with countless sharp edges to cut me to ribbons.

    I'm sure there are a great many chemical concerns that would be thrilled to tell you all about their alumina powders should you care to ask. But trust me, until we can do with alumina what clams can do with chalk the most interesting thing one is likely to do with alumina is make a crucible.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:and the engineers all over the world... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      the last thing I was between me and a bullet is a sheet of something that will shatter with countless sharp edges to cut me to ribbons

      actually the last thing I would want is the second bullet :)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:and the engineers all over the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you watched the "Bullet Proof" shows on the History Channel you would know that many modern military body armor uses ceramic that by itself is brittle and shatters but when bonded to kevlar or balistic nylon with resin, it becomes a barrier to bullets stronger than steel. The Kevlar layer keeps the ceramic from shattering and the inherrent hardness of the ceramic all but destroys the bullet on impact.

  21. Finally! by Big+Nothing · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can walk around in public with my aluminum foil hat and not look stupid anymore!

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  22. It would make it a lot easier for me... by ksp · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...when I go outside wearing this piece of clothing, discussed recently.

    --
    What is the sound of one hand clapping?
    cat /dev/null > /dev/audio
  23. Proper translation of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hi,

    as Babelfish & Co are not really up to it yet, here's my human-made translation of the German article. I'm a German native speaker, but I can't guarantee the English spelling, so take with a grain of salt ;-).

    Things in [brackets] are my remarks.

    - - - -

    Der Spiegel [leading German magazine, a la Times or Newsweek]
    February 19, 2002

    TRANSPARENT

    Armour-like tile protects from projectiles

    Researchers in Dresden [German city] have developed transparent and extremely hard tiles. The Pentagon, among others, is fascinated by this material, which can be used to produce e.g. bullet-proof visors.

    [PICTURE] picture caption: "transparent Aluminium tile"

    America's weapon technicians show interest for an armour-like tile from Dresden. At the "Fraunhofer-Institut für Keramische Technologien" [Fraunhofer institute for ceramics technologies] there, fine-grained aluminium oxide was successfully baked in an oven at 1200 C to produce an extremely hard, transparent material.

    A plate sized 10x10 cm (thickness: 1 cm) only weighs about 400 g, but is three times as hard as hardened [tempered?] steel. During shooting trials on behalf of the "Bundeswehrbeschaffungsamt" [federal procurement office] in Koblenz, "outstanding results" were achieved, according to the researcher Andreas Krell.

    The tiles are also being examined in the US state of Idaho: The Pentagon is fascinated by the transparency of the material, which can be used to build bullet-proof visors or big windows for armoured personnel carriers [Panzerspähwagen?].

    1. Re:Proper translation of article by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      This is what I come to Slashdot for. Thanks!

      (By the way - somebody with mod points please mod ths up.)

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    2. Re:Proper translation of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you put your excellent translating abilities in a program, or get babelfishes programmers to properly understand your process of translation. What is the key eh? Heck you might even be an AI program anyway. I'm pretty sure if AI has been cracked, it would be a military secret. If they evolved the heuristic for an eliza program, to the degree that the heuristic for a chess program has been evolved. Even madder, how do you know I'm a person? Turin's test could turn out the same way as the Turin shroud.

    3. Re:Proper translation of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. Now if you have some more spare time, perhaps you could translate all of the back issues of Perry Rhodan for me. I am especially interested in the part where he goes to the Andromeda galaxy.

      :)

      --- Brian

  24. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Scotty give the instructions on how to make it to some guy in Star Trek 4????

    ROFL!!!

    1. Re:OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please kill yourself.

  25. micrograin materials by Genda · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is very cool... however it's no more exciting than micrograin metals or some of the amazing things they can now do with micrograin titania.

    Micrograin copper for instance conducts like gold, and is nearly as hard as steel (while being much lighter... this is wonderful stuff.)

    Micrograin titania, another ceramic, is transparent, significantly harder than steel, as flexible as plastic, lighter than aluminum, and can smile at temperatures that would turn most metals into soup. Some folks who are working diligently on electrolytic extraction for titanium (the process that brought the price of aluminum down, from more precious than gold), believe that micrograin titania could one day make the perfect engine (since it can be cast and sintered directly into useable parts.)

    Face it kidlings, the steady march of material science is giving us an incredible boon of new and amazing new stuff to play with... pretty much like the rest of technology knocking on our collective doors. I want to be the first on my block with a Moller Skycar with the transparent titania upgrades.

    Moller Skycar; http://www.moller.com/skycar/

    Genda B -- I detest Osama bin Laden, a man who is the bigoted, violent, religiously fanatical, spoiled son of a rich oil magnate, who believes he can control the world with the threat of war and destruction. Hey, wait that sounds like somebody else...

    1. Re:micrograin materials by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Micrograin copper for instance conducts like gold, and is nearly as hard as steel (while being much lighter... this is wonderful stuff.)

      Excuse my igorance, but does it tarnish?
      that is why we use Gold in electronics, and not silver, which is more conductive.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:micrograin materials by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
      believe that micrograin titania could one day make the perfect engine
      Some time ago it was determined that using different materials in different parts of an engine produced a better engine. For efficiency, you want the combustion to occur at a high temperature. To minimise weight in anything that moves, you want to have a relatively light cooling system. The ceramic engine prototypes produced to this point have had the limitation that they do not conduct heat very well (titania is also limited this way), so then a better cooling system has been required for those prototypes, which sometimes cancelled out the benifits of lower engine mass and better fuel efficiency.

      What has been done in the last decade (or more) is to have ceramic in the combustion chamber and a metal engine block to conduct away the heat. I think this has been used commercially for a few years. The other big problems with the all ceramic engine concept is that in some situations you want a bit of toughness, and that it is not yet known how to produce large pieces of high strength ceramic without a fairly high chance of significant flaws (which are going to be very small internal cracks or gaps). What this would mean in practice, is that you would make your engines, test them to beyond the conditions they are likely to experience and keep the ones that survive. A ceramic connecting rod could be made (and probably has), but something that isn't brittle would be nice in that situation, and you don't have to worry about heat, so steel is a good choice.

      SiAlON is another material to watch. Turn rice husks into jet turbine blades!

  26. "outstanding results" from live fire tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of "Strange Days"

    [car chase, people getting shot at, passenger ducks in seat]
    driver/bodyguard: "Don't worry, the car windows are made of bullet resistant glass."
    passenger: Bullet RESISTANT? What happened to bullet PROOF?

    I'm assuming the Pentagon is interested in this "transparent aluminum" since it provides a cost and/or performance advantage over current "bullet-proof" glass technologies. IIRC, current bullet proof glass is really polycarbonate (or other similar plastic), tempered glass layered with a plastic, or just plain glass that is made REALLY thick.

    So, I'm curious and would like to know more than the article gives. How much does it cost compared to other windowing materials? What is its failure mode? (Does it shatter like sheet glass, pebble like safety glass?) I can imagine a near future where a luxury car maker will advertise thier new models with "transparent aluminum windshield, so strong it resists chips, cracks, and small arms fire".

  27. How does "transparency" work? by Gilmoure · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What allows some things to pass light waves through them others to reflect light waves. I understand how reflection and color works. Photons hit the atoms of a substance and the substance obsorbs photons of some wavelengths while other bounce back. The wavelengths of the photons bouncing back are the color that we see. I just don't see how photons can pass all the way through some fairly dense substances. Any one, any one? Buhler?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  28. Re: TAG Heuer Watches by fferreres · · Score: 1

    I noticed my watch (TAG Heuer) has an interesting inscription at the back:

    Swiss Made - Saphire Crystal - Water Resitant - 200M - Stailess Steel (which a recent post in slashdot stated stains by the way).

    I thought this crystal was was cool when i received this gift watch. But i never thought it was THAT hard or that was used for military applications. And that it is related to Aluminuim is a big suprise to me also (and the fact that you can manufacture saphire is also surprising!).

    Description: It's perfectly transparent (100%, like glass) and doesn't get scratches. This watch is 10 years old, yet the crystal is intact and looks "new", no matter how close you look at it.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  29. Re:star trek Kahn by a+random+streaker · · Score: 1

    That's truer than you know. Witness this scenario:

    Designer babies worldwide are heavily selected to be male, perhaps on a rediculous scale, say 4:1 or more. Fast forward 30 years.

    You now have a young male population that has no females, and by the hundreds of millions, even billions if the practice really takes off in the overpopulated 3rd world countries with pressures to produce a male as the first baby.

    Now comes some charismatic leader and, well, I hope I'm in the grave by that point.

    --
    "All representatives are busy. The estimated hold time is one..hundred..sixty..four..minutes." Detroit Edison, 02/01/02
  30. Hmmm...Is anyone missing a couple of whales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (by the name of George and Gracie?)

  31. Re: TAG Heuer Watches by asterisk_man · · Score: 1

    I have seen watches with similar inscriptions before and I have always been under the impression that they were talking about the crystal oscillator not the front glass. Quartz crystal is more prominant I believe, I'm not sure the point of using other crystals for the oscillator but I feel pretty certain that you don't have a watch with the front 'glass' made of saphire. prove me wrong if you can, I'd love to know that such a thing exsists.

  32. Wonder Woman? by bribo · · Score: 1

    Can Wonder Woman's invisible jet be far behind?

  33. The ideal material by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 1

    For the next generation of stealth fighter planes:
    - You don't see them on the radar
    - You don't see them with your eyes

    Only the pilot has to be made transparent as well...

    1. Re:The ideal material by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I can see it now, "Damn! My contact fell out, now where is it..."

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  34. I don't speak German but... by drkich · · Score: 1

    There has been a lot of talk of Hardness vs. Strength. The fish translated the article as saying Hardness, but could this just be a mistranslation? I noticed fish does this sometimes.

    1. Re:I don't speak German but... by uradu · · Score: 2

      hart (Härte): hard (hardness)
      stark (Stärke): strong (strength)

      I do speak German, I've read the article, and they're saying exactly what you think they're saying: it's three times harder than hardened steel. Now they just need to make it a bit more transparent and less milky.

    2. Re:I don't speak German but... by muchandr · · Score: 1

      The piece of sapphire crystal on my watch is
      perfectly transparent...

    3. Re:I don't speak German but... by uradu · · Score: 2

      > The piece of sapphire crystal on my watch is perfectly transparent...

      Except you can't buy it in the shape of your car's windshield.

    4. Re:I don't speak German but... by muchandr · · Score: 1

      Well, Rado 'Coupole' and 'Integrale' models do
      have curved sapphire crystals. This is a major
      point of corporate pride, but you CAN make
      non-flat sapphire glass. Making one the size
      of a windshield has got to be prohibitely
      expensive, though...

    5. Re:I don't speak German but... by uradu · · Score: 2

      > Making one the size of a windshield has got to be prohibitely expensive, though...

      Right, and that's the whole point of this research. How to essentially "bake" a sapphire of any size and shape (relatively cheaply, I would also assume).

  35. Bulletproof Windows? by Publicus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Right!

    Oh, wait, this one isn't about computers.. hehe.

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

    1. Re:Bulletproof Windows? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2
      Oh, wait, this one isn't about computers.. hehe.

      One form of alumimium oxide is commonly known as Ruby, which as we know is a language somewhat like Python...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  36. Re: TAG Heuer Watches by gweeks · · Score: 1

    http://www.europastar.com/ESWatch/index.html?watch tech/watchcrystals.html

  37. Invisible Aluminum means Invisible Planes! by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Is anyone else thinking what I'm thinking. Yes you there, the one that collected DC Comics* as a kid and watched campy action adventure shows on TV in the 70's:
    WONDER WOMAN flew an invisible plane!
    Now all we need is her golden lasso to get the bad guys to tell the truth and some magic bullet-deflecting bracelets and we'll be all set.

    * Note: in my opinion this was one of the clear ways to distinguish a geek from a nerd in the 70's and early 80's. Geeks read Marvel books like X-Men and Spiderman, and nerds read DC books like Superman and Wonder Woman. Of course this whole distinction changed when the Dark Knight series came out. Being a devoted Frank Miller fan, that was enough for me to become at least publisher neutral when it came to comics

  38. Re:star trek Kahn by markbark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    even billions if the practice really takes off in the overpopulated 3rd world

    Why is it that the 3rd world is always thought of as "overpopulated"?

    FYI the population density of San Mateo County or Manhattan is greater than that of Bangladesh.
    How come we never hear of the overpopulation of those places? Is the problem really too many brown people?

    The "overpopulation problem" is simply a way for "liberals" to indulge in guiltless racism.

  39. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by Peyna · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    There was a comment posted awhile ago on another article that stated that the original name of the element was 'Aluminum', but in England they felt it should follow most of the other elements and end in ium, so they changed it to allow a 2nd spelling, 'Aluminium'.

    So, that would make those of us in the US at least spelling it the original way =]

    --
    What?
  40. Not THAT expensive by amunter · · Score: 1

    I remember buying a big chunk of single crystal sapphire when we were building a neutron beam at our school's reactor. Sapphire crystals make good fast neutron filters. We got a 3 inch diameter by 6 inch long cylinder of the stuff (which was slightly pink colored when we installed it) for a couple thousand dollars. Cost a lot to have it sliced so it would fit though, heh. So I bet the expensive part of the process would be the machining to make your lenses, not the sapphire itself.

    When we took it out of the neutron beam it was brown colored. Strange that sapphire turns brown when irradiated, topaz turns blue, and pearls turn gray.

    1. Re:Not THAT expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right about machining being the expensive part. It's quite challenging to drill a hole in a Sapphire plates (you have to advance very slowly, takes hours) or to polish it (I had a 4cm x 1cm plate that took 1 week machine time to polish in the workshop). If you buy Sapphire, thin plates are more expensive than thick ones.

  41. Re: TAG Heuer Watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in a watch shop for a few years. Sapphire crystals are a wonderful thing, but not simply limited to Tag Heuer watches; Movado, Rolex, Panerai, Tissot, Zodiac, and many, many other watches > ~ $500 have a sapphire crystal these days. About the only things that will leave a mark on a sapphire crystal are diamonds, tungsten carbide (often found on industrial grade saws), other rubies and sapphires (though this will take great force), and some of the more exotic peices of marble and formulations of concrete.

    For a watch that will look new just about forever (though granted it's a little dressy), Movado has a watch that not only has a sapphire crystal, but the case and bracelet are all made of tungsten carbine (which is actually a little harder than even sapphire (~ 9.1 on the Moh's scale; 10 == diamond, 9 == sapphire). In other words, it's pretty near indestructable.

  42. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU STUPID, IGNORANT AMERICAN! It was supposed to be spelled as 'aluminium', but when Alcoa first used the metal in its name, it was 'The Aluminum Company of America', so the way you are spelling it is a BIG MISTAKE!!!

  43. The real application by bunyip · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unbreakable beer glass.

    As an aficionado of German beer, I'm sure that this will be the first real application. They just want to get the military to pay for some cool toys along the way.

    1. Re:The real application by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Trouble is, hardness does not equal impact resistance. Glass is very hard and pretty strong, until a crack starts -- then it runs clear through the material. Aluminum oxide is harder, but I think it's also brittle.

      I can't really tell from the extremely bad translations, but it sounds like maybe this is a process analogous to tempering glass -- that is, heat treating it to create internal stresses that limit crack propagation. Probably very expensive. If it would make an unbreakable beer mug at a reasonable price, they'd already have tempered glass unbreakable mugs...

    2. Re:The real application by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Hey, just the cool factor of having a saphire beer glass might be worth the extra cost.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  44. Re: TAG Heuer Watches by fferreres · · Score: 1

    Here's the link that worked for me (same, but without the inner space):

    http://www.europastar.com/ESWatch/index.html?watch tech/watchcrystals.html

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  45. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by Peyna · · Score: 2
    a href="http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/elements/13. html">this will give you a brief story on the history of the name. For those too lazy to go there and read it:


    (L. alumen, alum) The ancient Greeks and Romans used alum as an astringent and as a mordant in dyeing. In 1761 de Morveau proposed the name alumine for the base in alum, and Lavoisier, in 1787, thought this to be the oxide of a still undiscovered metal.


    Wohler is generally credited with having isolated the metal in 1827, although an impure form was prepared by Oersted two years earlier. In 1807, Davy proposed the name aluminum for the metal, undiscovered at that time, and later agreed to change it to aluminum. Shortly thereafter, the name aluminum was adopted to conform with the "ium" ending of most elements, and this spelling is now in use elsewhere in the world.


    Aluminium was also the accepted spelling in the U.S. until 1925, at which time the American Chemical Society officially decided to use the name aluminum thereafter in their publications.

    --
    What?
  46. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by msulis · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure we can count on accurate of translationedspecific words in article, however...

    I concur that "hardness" and "strength" are not the same thing. Even "strength" has many facets. I'm not sure exactly what property is the most significant in stopping bullets, but I'd imagine it's compressive strength? A breaking window in say, a vehicle, shatters from failure in tensile strength, but bullet creates a local compression failure I would imagine.

    If "hardness" stopped bullets would we be nailing DeBeers for all their stockpiled diamonds and using them to make tanks?

    (which, btw, would look REALLY awesome I bet - a solid diamond tank!)

  47. Spiegel? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought they just made clothes for wannabe-yuppie women and fine accessories. Didn't know they were in the materials business :)

  48. But is it..... by jhines0042 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    .... Alum-inum -or- Alu-mini-um ???

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  49. more corundum trivia by muchandr · · Score: 1

    Yep, Al2O3 (corundum) is the generic term for
    rubies and sapphires and is completely clear
    when pure. It is the second-most hardest substance
    known to man after the diamond (Vicker's scale 9
    to diamond's 10) The artificial variety is often
    referred to as 'sapphire crystal' and has been
    extensively used in fancy watchmaking to produce
    extremely scratch-resistant watch dials. See,
    for example, the materials section of rado.com

    http://www.rado.com/topFrame.asp?rootMenuId=13&m en uId=13

    1. Re:more corundum trivia by armb · · Score: 2

      > It is the second-most hardest substance known to man after the diamond (Vicker's scale 9 to diamond's 10)

      You are thinking of the Mohs hardness scale, not Vickers.
      http://www.webelements.com/webelements/p roperties/ text/definitions/hardness-mineral.html

      And just because corundum is second on the list doesn't mean there are no substances in the range between 9 and 10. Things like titanium carbide, silicon carbide, boron carbide, and boron nitride are (or can be).
      (However they aren't found naturally the way corundum and diamond are).

      --
      rant
    2. Re:more corundum trivia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Al2O3 was Alumina... one of the main ingredients of clay...

    3. Re:more corundum trivia by muchandr · · Score: 1

      My guess is that it all depends on specific
      crystalline structure. Similarly, pure carbon
      can take the form of coal, graphite or diamond.

    4. Re:more corundum trivia by Negadecimal · · Score: 1

      silicon carbide

      Ah, moissanite. 9.3 on the Moh's scale, if I remember correctly.

    5. Re:more corundum trivia by armb · · Score: 1

      > moissanite

      (fx:googles) Oh. Ok, I take back what I said about it not being found naturally. (I suppose I could claim "naturally like diamond and corundum" is still true if it means "naturally in large enough pieces to make significant amounts of jewelry".)

      --
      rant
    6. Re:more corundum trivia by Negadecimal · · Score: 2

      > moissanite
      (fx:googles) Oh. Ok, I take back what I said about it not being found naturally.


      I actually don't know whether moissanite is natural or not.

      I always assumed it was synthetic.

      So I wasn't trying to make a point or anything with that post...I was just proud of myself for remembering the name for silicon carbide :)

    7. Re:more corundum trivia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I actually don't know whether moissanite is natural or not. I always assumed it was synthetic.

      "Natural moissanite is very rare and is limited to iron-nickel meteorites and a few other rare ultra-mafic igneous occurences." First found in Meteor Crater, Arizona by Dr. Ferdinand Henri Moissan. As a gemstone or industrial abrasive it's synthetic though. Until I grepped for moissanite following your post I didn't know about it being a gemstone.

      But this is gettimg even more off-topic, though I doubt moderators are looking at this story any more.

  50. Re:star trek Kahn by jd142 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    There are at least two different ways to think about overpopulation. The first is pure density, so many people in so many square miles. That's what you are talking about.

    Then there's the birthrate. I believe the us birthrate is something like 2.0(I could be wrong about the exact figure, but I know the sense is right), which means 2 babies born for every 2 people in the country. Some quick thought will realize that this is not enough for population replacement. The replacement birthrate is something like 2.4 live births for every 2 people in the population, because you have people who die before they reproduce, childless couples, etc. In the past 100 years or so, the trend has been that the the more developed the country is, the lower the birth rate. So while a particular county may have a very high population density, the people there are not reproducting at a rate that can sustain that population. The population is sustained through immagration (hence Buchannan's book where he advocates all the white folks getting busy getting busy and pumping out more white kids.) Generally speaking, the more educated you are, the fewer kids you have.

    Plus, San Mateo has enough resources available to feed its population. This is not always the case in what are called 3rd world countries.

    So while San Mateo has more people per square mile, those people all have a higher standard of living and their population is stable. They aren't necessarily overpopulated for their geographic area. Meanwhile, in a 3rd world country the population is increasing while the standard of living and education is not.

    Personally, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea if a random sampling of half the population of the planet never had kids and those that remained had only 1 or 2 kids. Random would remove all possibility of bias. There are too damn many people everywhere.

  51. Hey! by Byteme · · Score: 2
    Isn't my Oris watch crystal made from this?

  52. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by armb · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    > the original name of the element was 'Aluminum', but in England they felt it should follow most of the other elements and end in ium, so they changed it to allow a 2nd spelling

    In English "aluminium" isn't just an allowable second spelling, it is the standard spelling. It's also the internationally agreed IUPAC spelling. (And yes "aluminum" was used before "aluminium". Full history at http://www.webelements.com/webelements/scholar/ele ments/aluminium/history.html).

    --
    rant
  53. OK, I'll be the pessimist here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they don't make screen doors of this stuff! Suddenly your dog running into the door isn't usuable footage for "America's Funniest Home Videos" after that severe head trauma

  54. Transparent tiles by technopinion · · Score: 1

    Yeah, now I can redo my kitchen floor with transparent tiles, so I can still see the plywood underneath!

    Woohoo!

  55. Lots of Star Trek IV references... by Oswald · · Score: 1

    ...but does anybody know if there was any hint this could be done before the movie was made? Either there was some indication this stuff could be made and the writers grabbed onto it, or this is an amazing coincidence, or (and this is the one that I find most intriguing) it was tried because somebody saw the movie and said "hmmmm..."

    If that were the case it would be kind of spooky. Just how many "impossible" things are only a few years of research from reality if we only had the idea to try.

  56. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by armb · · Score: 2

    http://www.webelements.com/webelements/scholar/ele ments/aluminium/history.html says "the name alumium [...] change it to aluminum." which you have to admit is more convincing than "the name aluminum [...] change it to aluminum."

    --
    rant
  57. Synthetic Saphires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that you've been able purchase (fairly cheaply) very large volumes of Monocrystaline Aluminum Oxide from chemical companies with various contaminates (to get Saphires and rubies).

    The biggest problem I remember from working with it was getting rid of scratches, and it isn't quite as clear as the polycarbinate shell on the deep sea submersable Alvin. Not that it is easy to scratch (Hardness of 9.2 I think), you just have to use diamonds to polish it.

  58. Great! by Jebediah21 · · Score: 2

    Soon we can protect our computers from drive by shootings! Why, I just lost my third i386 to one last week.

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  59. Germany? by rnturn · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I thought Scotty gave the process for transparent aluminum to a Bay Area company.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  60. Re:AutoPr0n by rirugrat · · Score: 1
    Hey forget the transparent stuff...the real discovery is Autopr0n.com!!! No pop-up ads! Pictures of people exchanging clothing and bodily fluids!!

    Chris

  61. Re:star trek Kahn by monkeydo · · Score: 1

    What? Your defenition of birthrate doesn't make any sense. How are you counting the population? Are you claiming that every year 2 children times the population of the US are born? And that isn't enough for replacement? That's absurd. A much more useful measure would be a ratio of births:deaths. If this was 1:1 that would be no net gain, a ratio of 2:1 would mean the population is growing. to have a shrinking population you would have to have a lower birthrate than deathrate.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  62. Aluminum shuminum by royalblue_tom · · Score: 1

    Feel free to spell and pronounce Aluminium as you like. As long as you change your spelling of Condominium ...

    1. Re:Aluminum shuminum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do I have to change my spelling of curmurgeon to curmurgeoeon too?

  63. Here's the translation by wpmegee · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Here's the translation for those of you too lazy to put the URL into Babelfish:

    Dresdner researchers developed transparent and extremely hard page frames. By the material, from which visors can firingfixed be manufactured, also the pentagon is fascinated.

    A 10 times 10 centimeters large disk (strength: only about 400 gram weigh, are however three times harder 1.0 cm as hardened steel. With firing tests under contract of the German Federal Armed Forces from the Bundeswehr in Koblenz " outstanding results " were obtained, report the researcher Andreas Krell.

    Also in the US state Idaho were examined the tiles: The pentagon is fascinated of the transparency of the material, with which firingfixed of visors or large windows of armored reconnaissance vehicles can be built.

  64. Re:star trek Kahn by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    His definition does make sense. 2 people born for every 2 people in the country. Not per year, but total. Specifically the average American woman will have about 1.9 children for all of her child-bearing years. And that number seems to be falling. In Italy, the birthrate is 1.1 children. Developing countries, by contrast often have birthrates from 3 to 6 children, although these countries also tend to have higher infant- and child-mortality rates as well.

  65. second-harderst material? by muchandr · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the scale confusion. I ment that there
    is no known substance harder than corrundum, but
    I was wrong here. There are reports that cubic
    boron carbide, some lantanoids or this thing:

    http://www.ameslab.gov/news/release/substance.ht ml

    Are harder than corundum. The (admittedly very
    hard) ceramics you mention are in the 7-9 range,
    to my knowledge. Also check out the autonomous
    discovery of ultra-hard materials project:

    http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/9704/Thaler /T haler-9704.html

    (uses some sort of neuronal network)

    1. Re:second-harderst material? by armb · · Score: 1

      > The (admittedly very hard) ceramics you mention are in the 7-9 range, to my knowledge

      The ceramics I mentioned included (cubic) boron nitride, which your link says was previously the second hardest substance. Search for suppliers of those materials and you will find data sheets saying they are over 9. Maybe they are exaggerating.

      The idea that francium beryllide could be harder than diamond is interesting though. Difficult to use something with a half-life of 22 minutes as an engineering material though.

      --
      rant
  66. Sapphire Windows by Fissure_FS2 · · Score: 1

    Excuse me while I roll my eyes, but anyone can make sapphire Windows. All you need is some skill with WindowBlinds. ;-)

    --
    My life's goal is to get a score of +3!
  67. Re:star trek Kahn by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
    > Designer babies worldwide are heavily selected to be male, perhaps on a rediculous scale, say 4:1 or more. Fast forward 30 years. [ ... ]
    >
    > Now comes some charismatic leader and, well, I hope I'm in the grave by that point.

    What, you get pretty fireworks and solve the "too many males and not enough females" problem. Evolution in action ;-)

  68. invisible planes by muchandr · · Score: 1

    There have been successeful prototypes on 'invisible planes' around WWII, but the
    whole thing was put on back burner. Invisibility
    to radar is a lot more important than what you
    see in visual part of the spectrum in modern
    BVR battlefield environment. However, 'plasma
    stealth' techologies ala 'project Aurora' have
    the potential for true invisibility (absorbtion
    as opposed to reflection ala 'stealth fighter/bomber') in visual range also...

  69. Whales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmmmm

    Somebody check SF's parks for cloaked Klingon's ships! They must be somewhere......

    Whales are nervous today......dolphins are leaving either. Is something coming?

    Sorry....too much LDS ;)

    (Beam me up Scotty, but with my pants this time!)

    1. Re:Whales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh huh huh uhuhuhh. Star Trek is cool.

      Please fuck off.

  70. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft claims they just need to patch the hole.

  71. Halocarbon production in Nature by Guppy · · Score: 3, Informative

    "It would be more like a ban on covalent bonds between carbon and chlorine, which rarely if ever occur in nature and are stable enough to persist for centuries."

    Not really true -- halocarbons are actually more common in nature than you think. A number of organisms such as certain fungi and marine algae produce halocarbons containing chlorine, bromine, and iodine. These compounds can range from simple Methyl-type compounds to polycyclic aromatics.

    They can also be formed when wood decays in the presence of halogen salts. The lignin portion of wood is basically a polymer of aromatic alcohols, and under the right conditions halogen ions can react to form aromatic halocarbons.

  72. Pornstar Normality by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1
    But see, the only reason we think they're ugly is because
    • We associate nudity with sex, because people are never casually naked.
    • We assume that the average naked person looks like a pornstar (well, most slashdotters see more naked pornstars than naked people, I think)


    If we didn't load nudity so much, we'd realize that our puffy, flabby, furry hides are pretty normal. Really---if you're having nudity issues, go to a gym and see that even people who work out occasionally are kinda blah-looking by pornstar standards.

    Err, not "Ron Jeremy" standards. I think we can all live up to those, with the exception of the ten-inch cock requirement.

    --grendel drago
    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  73. True 'dat by Kibo · · Score: 2

    If you're into that sort of thing, which is most definately cool. You should look at some of the stuff with spider silk. There's a company that genetically engineer goats to express the stuff spider silk is made of in their milk. (one would assume the golden orb spider) Then they get fetta cheese and spider silk on a reasonable scale. (I don't know if fetta cheese comes from goats, but I do like the way it just rolls off the tongue, so if you're a cheese expert feel free to interject).

    I would also like to think that our military personel have something a little more substantial that alumina, perhaps silicon carbide, or better yet a ceremet of silicon carbide and nickle (but maybe that'd be too heavy). Either way in a kevlar vest, their opaque and not windows. I think Titanium Boride has been used for bullet proof vests too.

    A'ight, yo.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  74. Re:star trek Kahn by monkeydo · · Score: 2

    How many children a woman has during her life is not really a usefull statistic when trying to determine population growth. It is much more usefull to compare birth and death rates.

    According to the CIA Factbook:
    Birth rate: 14.2 births/1,000 population (2001 est.)
    Death rate: 8.7 deaths/1,000 population (2001 est.)

    So for each death approximately 1.6 children are born. This would indicate population growth.

    The fact that 2.8 children are born for "every two people" does not tell us anything about population growth. Depending on life expectencies, infant mortality rates and sex distribution of the population that could indicate growth or shrinking.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  75. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by uradu · · Score: 2

    > I'm not sure we can count on accurate of translationedspecific words in article, however...
    > I'm not sure exactly what property is the most significant in stopping bullets

    Well, the article clearly uses the word "hardness", not "strength" (I do speak German), and given the context in which it is used (research into bullet-stopping materials), I'd say it's pretty clear that the bullet-stopping type of hardness is meant here. If it had the properties of jello WRT stopping bullets, I don't think they'd waste their time on it.

  76. Hardness and Toughness Defined by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Informative
    The material is very hard, and could be used as bulletproof windows

    Hardness increases with toughness not necessarily vis versa.

    Think of it roughly in these terms:

    A hardness contest between two materials consists of trying to scratch one with the other. The one scratched is harder.

    A toughness contest between two materials consists of trying to break one material with the other. The one broken wins.

  77. Time Domain claims to have transparent metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although they removed the page from their website with their recent redesign, you can still access it through Google's cache:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:s6W9amqY19IC: www.timedomain.com/Technology/optics/metal.html

  78. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some fifty posts talking about Scotty introducing invisible aluminum to 20th century earth in Star Trek IV" yet somehow the one post on Wonder Woman, who clearly was using invisible aluminum 50 years ago is modded offtopic? Flamebait I could have understood, but not offtopic.

  79. transparent METALS proper? (link to EE times) by muchandr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Metals made transparent by photonic layer structure:

    http://eetimes.com/story/OEG19991108S0095

    This is much more useful than transparent armor,
    IMHO, if it can indeed be applied to photonic
    band-gap filtering...

  80. Rado by muchandr · · Score: 1

    Most Rado watches are made from ultra-hard
    ceramics also: www.rado.com

  81. well, is this a first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It has seemed ever since the originial series aired that many of the ideas where directly or indirectly resulting from theories and research going on in real life. Indirectly in this since referring to references to 'other' sci-fi material or standards that in actuality where themselves the result of real life theory and research.

    I don't think it is either a world shocker if anyone discovers that transparent aluminum was being researched at the time of the movie, or if it was merely mentioned as 'possible' by a chemical engineer or such. While many will enjoy yelling about 'life imitating art' they really should be saying 'life imitating art that previously imitated life'

    It is related to (and in some ways because of) this factor that older sci fi shows often seem silly in respects of look and feel of items that where so futuristic but yet we seem to have now. A bad example of this is when people asked about the problems of making Enterprise both fit in the continuity (obviously they decided it was better to scrap continuity) yet also not look totally ridulous from our prespective of real world technology. *that is not the bad example* The bad example of this was with communicators, where many people pointed out that modern cell phones are smaller and sexier than the communicators presented in the original series (especially the pilot). However, they forgot that in the series, it was not a short range, relayed radio (as in radio band of EM), but was in fact 'subspace' communications that is purely theoretical (despite our recent findings, it still baffles researchers). So, if we are talking about an entirely new communication system that requires no relay system. *remember, without a ship, satellite, tower, relay or other device, people could use their communicators to talk to other people thousands of miles away, even through the planets surface (no line of sight)*

    It is err... fascinating however.

  82. Re:star trek Kahn by markmoss · · Score: 2

    San Mateo has enough resources available to feed its population.

    No, it has the money to buy food and water from other sparsely populated areas in the US. Just disrupt civilization, motorized transportation, or the belief that pieces of green paper are actually worth something, and any American city would be in worse shape than Bangladesh... On the average, the US is fairly lightly populated, but that's averaging farmlands with one family per square mile, deserts and mountains with almost no permanent human residents, and densely populated urban areas together..

  83. Aluminium? by CrazyClimber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought Slashdot was an American site. In America we say a-LOO-mi-num...and ketchup.

  84. [OT] Re:Followup by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

    If I'm groking this correctly

    It is not possible to grok something incorrectly.

    Either you grok it, or you do not. If you do, then it cannot be incorrect.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  85. Re:star trek - Fusion Reactors by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 0

    Almost there...

    http://more.abcnews.go.com/sections/science/dail yn ews/tablefusion990324.html

    Hehehe,

    Ex-Misltech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  86. Idiot Hemos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go home Idiot. Your village misses you.

    Alumina (aluminum oxide) is no more "transparent aluminum" than a sandy beach is my CPU. You need to get some basic science into your thick head Hemos.

    And why haven't you written any more "Nano" stories lately? Reality catching up with you?

    1. Re:Idiot Hemos by thelizman · · Score: 1

      Damn dude, I may have a slight beef with the moderators cause they always shoot down my stories, but there's no need to get freakin personal on them. Try decaf, or get an enema or something.

  87. You mean... fusion isn't a reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm clueless to know either way, stupid American schools.

  88. Retraction...read this Sorry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't the American Medical Association! Sorry. I got that confused with the American Council on Science and Health.

    Not the American Medical Association!

  89. Not New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Um, fused Al2O3 windows have been used for years in vacuum systems.


    Go to a company like Kurt Lesker and look up "Sapphire viewports". They're mostly used for their optical properties, like when a quartz viewport would block the wrong wavelengths of light.


    BTW, hardness doesn't make it unbreakable. Glass is harder than steel, but it doesn't stop soft lead bullets, does it?

  90. No bulletproof windows! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    This would be used to create a whole new generation of Apple paraphenalia.

    The new: iCar!
    The exciting: iBoat!
    The unbelieveable: iRoof!

    The possibilities are endless, with our strong, clear steel!

    --
    It's been a long time.
  91. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by balthan · · Score: 1

    It's also the internationally agreed IUPAC spelling.

    Bah! Since when do we Americans care about international standards?

  92. Re:star trek Kahn by jd142 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Again, it depends. The birth/death rate is another way of looking at it, but it doesn't necessarily take into account recent rapid immagration. Or the fact that only a small percentage of people in a population are capable of giving birth at any one time.

    Let's say there's an island with 1000 people on it.

    If the island is suddenly discovered and a lot of people move in, say 1000 immagrants (50/50 split) are more likely to be younger (say under 50) and so they move in and have children. If the immagrants only have 1 child a piece after moving there, the death rate remains the same or goes up slightly (due to accidents), where the birth rate doubles. But the island's population will not grow that much over time because the new people do not replace themselves.

    Fun with statistics!

  93. 90,000th Scotty post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transparent aluminum? I thought Scotty invented that in Star Trek 4!

    Well, my breakfast burrito is rapidly congealing, so I'd better get my fat ass out of my bedroom in my parents' basement if I'm gonna make it to the SCA meeting! Whoops! There goes my artificial plastic Klingon forehead! Gotta buy more adhesive...

    Scotty! Aluminum! Hahahaaaha! Live long and prosper! I grok Frodo!

  94. Re:star trek - isolinear chips by igorxa · · Score: 2, Funny

    well, if you remember, isolinear chips didn't come around till star trek:tng. the episode "relics" even brings this up. that's the episode with scotty and the dyson sphere. getting off the transporter pad, scotty asks a question about one of the panels, and giordi says they replaced the old crystal memory cards with isolinear chips. so according to the trek timeline, those are another 300 years off.

    wow, i'm a dork

  95. Does that even exist? by clmensch · · Score: 1

    I haven't taken chemistry in like 8 years, but doesn't "oxide" mean O2? Dihydrogen Oxide to me sounds like 2H02. Or maybe it means H2O2, but for some reason I'm thinking the prefix "di-" is chemically different than the suffix "-ide" (thus 2H instead of H2)...but I couldn't tell you exactly what the difference is. Any chem majors out there?

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
    1. Re:Does that even exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a chem major many moons ago, and oxidation has hit those cells. My ears perked up on alum being the source of aluminum. Actually, aluminum is produced from bauxite, if I remember correctly. Alum is actually potash of some sort, an afterproduct...

    2. Re:Does that even exist? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      H202 is Hydrogen Peroxide... you put it on wounds and it fizzes! It's fun!

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    3. Re:Does that even exist? by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Even better, get the less diluted chem lab kind and pour it into a bucket of pig's blood. Then run away quickly.
      I don't mean to spoil the surprise, but here's a hint: The Shining

  96. Re: TAG Heuer Watches by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Very common. Any decently good watch has a sapphire face. Why? It's really hard, so it doesn't scratch easy.

    My Esquire has one... so did my Luminox...
    (Oh.. regarding those Luminox navy seal dive watches..... they are indestructuble, for sure.
    Just don't wear one to bed.. I woke up and found one of the prongs that hold sthe strap pin in had sheared right off the main housing. GO figure.
    Waterproof to 200 meters, used by navy seals, can take a hell of a beating.. but don't ware it to bed ;)

  97. Gee, how cool! by raytracer · · Score: 1
    My, that is amazing! Transparent aluminum oxide! What an incredible development! You know what would be really cool? If you could make it in say, red, or green, or blue....


    Advice to slashdot readers: stay in school until it begins to work.

  98. first step to opaque copper by crystalplague · · Score: 1

    this sounds like the first step need to obtain opaque copper for Tinfoil Hat Linux.

    From the readme:
    If at all possible, boot THL on a laptop & disconnect all external cables, including the power & mouse. Turn off nearby radios, including cell phones and microwaves. Put yourself and the computer in a well grounded opaque copper cube. Download your tinfoil hat plans from http://zapatopi.net/afdb.html. Boot the floppy....

  99. Aluminum Oxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, this material IS different from Saphire windows. It's old technology ( fusing metal powders under heat and pressure to make gears for instance ) applied to new materials ( Alumina ).

    First Saphire is grown in a molten solution of special salts, and comes out as one large inflexible crystal. The growing of the crystals can take a lot of time. The size of said crystals are limited.

    This alumina oxide panel is made from fine nanometer size particles of alumina that are sintered under high temperature and pressures. It turns out that materials made in such ways can have different properties than their bulk counterparts. For one thing, being made from essentially fused particles, crack propagation is a lot less. So normally shatter prone Alumina saphire now becomes more shatter resistant and tougher. In some cases, even flexible ceramics can be made if made from fused nanometer scale particles. The magic is in the gaps, interfaces and spaces between the particles. Particle size, temperature, and pressure can yield vastly different results. I wouldn't be suprised if they develop many specialized variations. Also, since the technology for sintering using metals is old, one can see alumina being used to replace metal in certain high temp settings.

    This powder sintering has been done in the past with ceramics. but the grain sizes were too large, and you simply made large brittle ceramics. It just became a way of making ceramic parts w/o having to deal with slurries, and wet casting and then firing them. The advancement of making ceramics into nanometer size powders has changed this dramatically. The resulting behaviour of sintered nanometer scale powder ceramics is vastly different. Some are even FLEXIBLE!

    So imagine, for an instant, FLEXIBLE shatter resistant alumina windows with the strength of 3x that of steel.

    And wait for more fun...

    Nanoscale composites. You get all sorts of cool fun when you mix powders from different substances together, and anneal them.

  100. Blazin' saddles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, that would also assume the jet turbine, which is full of white glowing fire, is transparent. I see a little flaw here.....

  101. Strong, tough and hard by Bikku · · Score: 4, Informative
    Materials engineering 101

    Strength - A property of materials under elastic deformation, meaning the degree to which the material bends under load, and then springs back to its original shape. At sufficiently high loading, the material deforms plastically, meaning it stays bent. Strong materials deflect very little under load (low strain per unit stress), and can take high loads before plastic deformation occurs.

    Toughness - A property of materials that contain microcracks or other fracture-inducing characteristics. Such flaws cause localized increases in stress levels and thereby cause fractures to expand until the material fails catastrophically. This is the mechanism underlying stress-corrosion cracking and fretting fatigue. Tough materials do not have high localizes stress at crack tips, and can tolerate microcracks without catastrophic propagation and failure.

    Hardness - The strength of a material at its surface. Measured empircally by poking it with sharp objects. Hard materials resist scratches and dents. But whether they deform (elastically or plastically) has nothing to do with their hardness. It has to do we their bulk strength.

  102. Transparent Aluminum by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

    The url for babelfish is actually:
    http://babelfish.altavista.com, not http://babelfish.altavista.net as reported.

  103. A little background for the curious by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2, Informative

    This research facility focuses on ceramic-related activity. Given that I am by profession very familiar with the process involved in the manufacture of such materials, I can venture an interesting guess.

    Porcelain and ceramic tiles get their strength from 2 processes: exposure to pressure from a vertical hydraulic press, and subsequent firing (baking) of the tile.

    1200 degrees is not very far off the temperatures at which the firing curves for commercial mass produced porcelain lie.

    I thus assume that the difference lies in the pressure at which the pellets are pressed. It's got to be a LOT higher than the pressures used in the commercial porcelain/ceramic manufacture environ.

    And anything will become harder when you compact it. Look at how diamonds are formed.

    So essentially, what we are saying here is " Hey, we took some transparent stuff, compacted it really tight then fired it, and whee, we got ourselves a slab of very hard transparent stuff"...

    Where's the innovation?

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  104. Errata: Hardness and Toughness Defined by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Informative
    The one scratched is harder.

    "harder" should, of course, have been "less hard".

  105. Thou Shalt Wear Pants by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Nonsense! Everybody knows that the nudity taboo was invented by Gapchaneloren IX in 1000 BC in order to help out the garmet industry!

  106. Well an US plexglass manufacturer ... by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    got it from scotty in exchange for enough thick plexiglass to make a large fish tank for the whale. Unfortunately the plexi company went down in the recent crash of the stock market, the guy was fired and was told not to come back in to work before he could get to the formula he left on the mac, and the computer it was sold on ebay. Apparently a german company got the bid, found the formula and worked out the details, and well the result is now on slashdot. :P

  107. FALSE. Population density of BangladeshSan Mateo by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    Your assumptions are false and misleading. The population density of Bangladesh is nearly one and a half times as high as the population density of San Mateo County.

    I won't argue with you about Manhattan, but Bangladesh as a whole has a significantly higher population density than most suburban areas. Bangladesh has 3.69 people *per acre*.

    Statistics Follow:

    Bangladesh:
    Population 131.26 million
    Area: 144,000 square kilometers

    Conversion of 2.591 km2 per mi2 gives 2,362 persons per square mile living in Bangladesh.

    San Mateo County:
    Population: 717,866
    Area: 449.10 square miles

    1,599 persons per square mile in SMC.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  108. A little bit of nothing can stop a crack by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    the last thing I was between me and a bullet is a sheet of something that will shatter with countless sharp edges to cut me to ribbons. It's fabricated from a powder, and isn't likely to be completely solid. There are going to be a large number of gaps between what used to be the powder particles. Any crack that starts in this material is going to go from gap to gap - following the path of least resistance. The most likely thing that will happen if this material is hit by a bullet is that a small chip will break off. A crack won't be able to make it to the far side of a thick piece of material - it will hit an air gap instead, and a new crack will have to start on the far side of that gap. Hit it hard enough and that will happen, but it will be more difficult to crack through completely than a completely solid piece of alumina. You end up with a material that isn't particularly tough, but it breaks the way you want it to.

    If the material is close to 100% of solid density, then you can put a polymer between a couple of layers of it, just like safety glass. One reason this is big news is that alumina is cheap and available by the tonne. Then again, so is silica.

  109. Re:star trek Kahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    way off topic and waaay wrong! Numbers of offspring is more a matter of CULTURE than intelligence. I know Mormon families (who are VERY well educated) who have large families (more than 4 kids). So please get a clue before you start spreading your racist bullshit.

  110. Hardness is very important by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 1

    Yes, this material is hard, not strong perhaps like steel. That's doesn't mean it might not be useful. Regular glass is also hard but not strong, yet it's used to make shatterproof glass. Many ceramics are very hard/not strong until layered/bonded with something.

    Perhaps you'll see a similar development as in conventional layered shatterproof/spallproof glass with layers of transparent aluminum oxide sandwiched with transparent polycarbonate(?) material. Using a combination of something very hard (aluminum oxide) and some way to distribute the energy of a colliding body (the bonded layering material) we may find this application of transparent aluminum oxide produces a very strong, clear barrier material.

  111. Good article, but... by shoemakc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good read but It really doesn't explain how you could use it to say.....

    ..build a million gallon tank on a starship to transport two humpback whales 200 years into the future in a desperate attempt to save mankind from a strange monolith emitting beached whale sounds.

    Jesus....what ever happened to investigative journalism these days? Also, wasn't this guy supposed to speek english?

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  112. Well, there's always transparent stones by zrk · · Score: 1

    and you'll never see 'em coming.

  113. Who is Osama? by kalamazoo904 · · Score: 1
    Genda B sez:

    >I detest Osama bin Laden, a man who is the
    >bigoted, violent, religiously fanatical, spoiled
    >son of a rich oil magnate, who believes he can
    >control the world with the threat of war and
    >destruction. Hey, wait that sounds like somebody
    >else...


    Indeed it does. Especially since Osama is the son of a rich construction magnate, not an oil magnate.


    Whence comes this idea that if you're rich and Arab, you're in the oil business? Princess Diana's last boyfriend was rich and Arab, but he was in the department store business...

    --
    Your friendly neighborhood nitpicker
  114. bulletproof windows by Kanasta · · Score: 2

    Great.

    But we already have bulletproof glass. What's so special?

  115. Tough Enuff by Kibo · · Score: 2

    For a ceramic, Alumina is pretty tough, but that's like saying for a 5th grader Todd Peterman is pretty tough. It takes very little to propigate cracks through ceramics. There some stuff that can be done, but ceramics aren't metal. And alumina has always been transparent.

    Now this MIGHT be news if they some how got their alumina powders on a nano scale where the alumina crystal grains are smaller than the wavelengths of light, then you'll actually get a relatively tough, and see through material. Not be cause something magical happens on that scale, but because the crack length will be huge, and actually require the formation of a large surface which would take a lot of energy despite the low toughness of the alumina. That would be news. BIG news. At least to me. But that's not what they said.

    They said they made a 10cm alumina tile. Big whoop.

    They might be able to enhance it by making it like corning wear, but that summery of a press release was clearly too light to provide that kind of detail. Which might have been interesting, although not news.

    I would bet that it being transparent means they either used a spectacularly fine powder, or it is basically fully dense as there doesn't appear to be many internal surfaces to scatter light (ie it's not opaque).

    Further more, I would bet that the flaw(s) introduced by the bullet would not be what caused it to fail, I would bet that pre-existing flaws near the bullets point of impact would be vastly expanded. Worse yet, the alumina tile might even bounce the bullet off instead of just stop it.

    Maybe the news is the simplicity and low cost? Too bad that didn't make it into the news then.

    Either way it sounds like it's nothing but a press release for a non-large company that's really happy that they might picked up as a contractor for the Department of Defence.

    Yawn. Already, we've given it more consideration that it deserves.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  116. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? We Americans take international standards very seriously ... so long as they're ANSI compliant ;o)

  117. potential use by brad3378 · · Score: 1

    If this material has useful properties for hardness, tensile strength, energy absorption, etc., Automakers might find it very useful.
    Auto Glass is very expensive. A typical (American) Ford Escort with a relatively small windshild will cost about $500.00 while larger windshilds Can cost over $1000.00 (Pontiac Transport Minivan).

    If auto windshilds alone could be replaced by this material, not only would it add torsional rigidity (reduction of twist) to the vehicle frame, but it may add visibility.

    A-Pillars could be replaced by this material making a wider field of vision.

    --

  118. About Damn Time!! by degauss · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, Scotty showed off this stuff in Star Trek IV (The Journey Home)...

    It's about time someone got it right!! So we're only about 20 years behind... o well

    --


    CoyboyNeal is God
  119. Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, if they made the jello though but not hard, it would reflect the bullets. not that bad.

  120. Re:star trek Kahn by logibear · · Score: 1

    actually, the term "overpopulation" is a reference to the ratio of people to natural resources, not a direct ratio of people to land area. The reason that Manhattan and other places not in the third world are not refered to as overpopulated is due to the fact that in comparison, the vast majority of people in Manhattan eat every day, at least once. Don't get me wrong, I live in Manhattan and am completely aware of the homeless situation, but the magority of people are not starving to death. And even in the "overpopulated third world" it is not the entire county that is lacking natural resouces (most of the time) but isolated areas were people are starving.

    --
    Logan ~~Nothing Nothing, Tralala?
  121. Re:star trek Kahn by a+random+streaker · · Score: 1

    >> even billions if the practice really takes off
    >> in the overpopulated 3rd world
    >
    > Why is it that the 3rd world is always thought
    > of as "overpopulated"?

    Overpopulated in the sense that they don't keep up with food production. That is more a government issue, though, as in too much government.

    > Is the problem really too many brown people?

    Absolutely not. There aren't enough people on the planet, the more the better. Just keep a strongarm government that "knows what's best" out of it.

    --
    "All representatives are busy. The estimated hold time is one..hundred..sixty..four..minutes." Detroit Edison, 02/01/02
  122. "dark ages" aren't necessarily "the middle ages". by CRConrad · · Score: 1
    "namespan" writes:
    MY comment was meant to refute [...]
    2) this was done in the middle ages
    But actually, the poster you responded to said, "the dark ages" [emphasis added]. Now, sure, that's *generally* used to mean "the middle ages", but I don't think the correspondence is absolute.

    At least AFAICS, the age of Genesis -- which depicts a barbaric semi-neolithic nomadic tribe roaming the deserts of the Middle East, making up stories about how their God requires them to bash in the heads of all the *other* barbaric semi-neolithic tribes, nomadic or not, that they meet (ironically, one of the earliest parallels to the Master Race teachings of the Nazis; OK, so call Godwin on me if you want) -- I'd say that age qualifies pretty damn well to be called "dark".
    --

    Christian R. Conrad
    mail me at iki.fi ; same user ID as here