C# takes the syntax of java and combines it with the runtime of java. There are some win32 libraries added that Sun didn't appreciate when Microsoft tried including them with J++. Oh, and they changed System.out.println() to System.console.writeln().
Introduce them to a little known test called "A+ Certification" -- anyone who has that piece of paper (and heaps who don't) is capable of supporting your PCs. And don't think Dell is going to give you any support for a measly 60 PC order. You get a 3 year warantee, whereas with OEM parts you only get 1 year, and only 30 days on CPUs and memory unless you pay a couple buck extra. That is the 90% of the difference between Dell and Joe Blow. For $600 apiece, I could give you fully assembled Athon XP 1800s (with no OS, shipping extra) -- and that's with *quality* parts. 512MB DDR, 300W Power Supply, etc.
At least half of those "thousands" of labels are wholly owned subsidiaries of the "big five". And every singe one of the "medium sized" labels is. By medium sized, I mean big enough to pay the artist something. If you're thinking of labels like "Sub Pop", they were bought out before Nirvana made it big.
I was thinking of Bynari as well. Start with using their backend for development purposes -- that would get outlook talking to their IMAP and other features, and try to build an abstraction layer in between, so that you can branch off your scheduling project, and then you could add other features as well. Caldera has a similar project i think, called "Volution" that might substitute, but I haven't heard much about it.
invitations could be handled by adding a few parsing rules to something like a majordomo style mailing list server. You could even send an XML format like the outlook text+html.eml (or whatever it is) mime type and build a handler for outlook (or other clients) to have a button that says "accept" instead of reply" -- and someone using pine can just type "accept" in the subject line and have full productivity integration. Jabber or even Biff could do pop-up reminders.
There's a project called PHP groupware that I haven't really looked at, and I think they're teaming up with GNUe, but I'm pretty sure they have the bulk of what you want. Of course, free software is all about building it yourself and then stealing from the competition when you get stumped.
Let me know when you're ready for help. I'm looking for a project to join. I was looking at GNUe, but don't think I'm cut out for "business" applications. Besides, I don't know python.
Its more fun to get in at the ground floor anyway.
I've been toying with my own EJB-like project for semi-persistent object caching for cgi & php, but I was stalled on building (well, designing) a pipeline similar to servlet forwarding. Now with Apache 2.0, that won't be a problem.
No, atheism is the belief in "no god" or gods. It is a specific anti-religion. It has nothing to do with science, except that some people who call themselves scientists also call themselves atheists.
Likewise monotheism does not denote a lack of belief in science.
Cause and effect, observable phenomena, hypothesis, data, theorem, proof, mathmatics. Neither belief system can claim "science" for its own. If the principle of atheism (disbelieve what is not proven) were extexded to science, there would be no atheist scientists.
Aha! That's where you're "common sense" fails you. More than a third of that elite fifth percentile DO NOT walk on the street, thus you would never pass them. Therefore, at the very most, only 1 in 60 people you pass on the street is worth $500 million.
Younger people raised on the Net don't pay nearly as much attention to mainstream media as their elders, so we have to reach them where they are....In fact, Net communications themselves have become increasingly segmented and targeted. Much has become subterranean, centered on mailing lists, IM and other limited-entry venues. >/i>
That's rediculous. The fact that the major media outlets (there are fewer of them than ever before, with greater than ever penetration into our lives, and higher integration between them -- all the news programs carry the same "top 10" stories that receive 90% of air time) can even presume to tap into web communications shows that it is false. The media giants are very successful at integrating into the video game and movie fan "underground" for example.
In past generations, the TV networks did not even dream of influencing what people talked about in their own home or with their neighbors or aquaintences. Chat rooms have replaced informal conversation in coffee-shops and so forth. News groups and websites like slashdot are called "forums" for a reason. In ancient Greece, all the Hellene geeks hung out in the Acropolis to discuss the latest abacusen and clay tablet geometric formulae. These days they do the same sort of thing on comp.os.minix and sometimes they might talk about politics or pop culture or indulge in flame wars, subjects their historic progenitors may have gotten into too.
here's an algorithm for converting a config file to a gui:
Make the option name a label. Enter the option value in a field. Have a shiny red button next to it labelled "help" that brings up the comments in the config file directly above it. Have another button (this one blue) at the bottom labelled "done."
In the original benchmark you're quoting, the biggest bottleneck was linux on SMP. Linux has gotten a lot better in that respect, but on more modest hardware, Apache (and Linux) have always smoked IIS and windows. On a relatively low end system, Apache on Windows beat IIS too. Of course, nowadays a dual or quad processor webserver with a big hunk of memory isn't as uncommon as it was then. Which comes full circle to speed isn't as important as stability these days.
If a company spent $20,000 on software licenses that depreciates in value over 5 years, they pay taxes on a portion of it. If they use free software and pay $20,000 on consulting fees, they don't pay taxes on a penny of it. Is that clear enough?
Accounting is the business of obfuscation and there are certain known phraseologies that are generally accepted. Any idiot with a calculator can balance books. Its making them look balanced when their not that makes accounting.
And of course there's the buddy system where certain accounting companies are "in" with the IRS and are almost never audited. The same goes for financials. They are assumed to be competent and low risk. Which is why everyone is dropping Arthur Anderson. It's not that they don't think they can do the job, it's that they know they are much more likely to get audited, because they are no longer in with them, to mangle a pronoun.
Of course part of an accountant's reputation is build on honesty, but a larger part is made on watertight obfuscation.
PHP is a runtime or webserver module -- just the same as ASP. Ruby and Python are the slowest (execution) of the common interpreted languages, but they make up for it in design (more oo features, faster dev times, clarity)
PHP is the fastest, execution wise, unless you start caching and JIT. General usage speed goes something like: Compiled C or whatever good JIT JAVA php perl ASP (there are only a few parser constructs to differentiate vbscript/jscript/perlscript --they aren't really different languages) lisp JSP python bad compiled JAVA
Slashdot Mirror
It's not a UI bug, just that some people don't surive the mutation:
X-RAY METER:
[Off--Low--Med--High--Glow--Kill--Mutate]
Tivo just got shut down. There are only 3 companies that wanted to _partner_ with Tivo as much or more, and they all have "B" as their middle initial.
cough*kyoto*cough!
C# takes the syntax of java and combines it with the runtime of java. There are some win32 libraries added that Sun didn't appreciate when Microsoft tried including them with J++. Oh, and they changed System.out.println() to System.console.writeln().
He's probably gone over to work with those commie satanists
ah, business functionality.
That's the point. "Programming" is more than just string comparison and arithmatic.
To qualify for an OEM copy of windows, it must be purchased with a new cpu, hard drive, or motherboard.
Introduce them to a little known test called "A+ Certification" -- anyone who has that piece of paper (and heaps who don't) is capable of supporting your PCs. And don't think Dell is going to give you any support for a measly 60 PC order. You get a 3 year warantee, whereas with OEM parts you only get 1 year, and only 30 days on CPUs and memory unless you pay a couple buck extra. That is the 90% of the difference between Dell and Joe Blow. For $600 apiece, I could give you fully assembled Athon XP 1800s (with no OS, shipping extra) -- and that's with *quality* parts. 512MB DDR, 300W Power Supply, etc.
At least half of those "thousands" of labels are wholly owned subsidiaries of the "big five". And every singe one of the "medium sized" labels is. By medium sized, I mean big enough to pay the artist something. If you're thinking of labels like "Sub Pop", they were bought out before Nirvana made it big.
self-aggrandizement
There is a Scientology (office?, church?) building right next to the Microsoft campus in Redmond.
I was thinking of Bynari as well. Start with using their backend for development purposes -- that would get outlook talking to their IMAP and other features, and try to build an abstraction layer in between, so that you can branch off your scheduling project, and then you could add other features as well. Caldera has a similar project i think, called "Volution" that might substitute, but I haven't heard much about it.
invitations could be handled by adding a few parsing rules to something like a majordomo style mailing list server. You could even send an XML format like the outlook text+html .eml (or whatever it is) mime type and build a handler for outlook (or other clients) to have a button that says "accept" instead of reply" -- and someone using pine can just type "accept" in the subject line and have full productivity integration. Jabber or even Biff could do pop-up reminders.
There's a project called PHP groupware that I haven't really looked at, and I think they're teaming up with GNUe, but I'm pretty sure they have the bulk of what you want. Of course, free software is all about building it yourself and then stealing from the competition when you get stumped.
Let me know when you're ready for help. I'm looking for a project to join. I was looking at GNUe, but don't think I'm cut out for "business" applications. Besides, I don't know python.
Its more fun to get in at the ground floor anyway.
I've been toying with my own EJB-like project for semi-persistent object caching for cgi & php, but I was stalled on building (well, designing) a pipeline similar to servlet forwarding. Now with Apache 2.0, that won't be a problem.
No, atheism is the belief in "no god" or gods. It is a specific anti-religion. It has nothing to do with science, except that some people who call themselves scientists also call themselves atheists.
Likewise monotheism does not denote a lack of belief in science.
Cause and effect, observable phenomena, hypothesis, data, theorem, proof, mathmatics. Neither belief system can claim "science" for its own. If the principle of atheism (disbelieve what is not proven) were extexded to science, there would be no atheist scientists.
Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism, Krushchevism, Maoism, Sovietism, Jism.
None of these were communism, or socialism. So you're saying there never has been anything resembling communism in the world, but we all yearn for it?
Aha! That's where you're "common sense" fails you. More than a third of that elite fifth percentile DO NOT walk on the street, thus you would never pass them. Therefore, at the very most, only 1 in 60 people you pass on the street is worth $500 million.
That's rediculous. The fact that the major media outlets (there are fewer of them than ever before, with greater than ever penetration into our lives, and higher integration between them -- all the news programs carry the same "top 10" stories that receive 90% of air time) can even presume to tap into web communications shows that it is false. The media giants are very successful at integrating into the video game and movie fan "underground" for example.
In past generations, the TV networks did not even dream of influencing what people talked about in their own home or with their neighbors or aquaintences. Chat rooms have replaced informal conversation in coffee-shops and so forth. News groups and websites like slashdot are called "forums" for a reason. In ancient Greece, all the Hellene geeks hung out in the Acropolis to discuss the latest abacusen and clay tablet geometric formulae. These days they do the same sort of thing on comp.os.minix and sometimes they might talk about politics or pop culture or indulge in flame wars, subjects their historic progenitors may have gotten into too.
What happens when you add your own directives though? It's pretty hard to make a typo if you can't type it.
here's an algorithm for converting a config file to a gui:
Make the option name a label.
Enter the option value in a field.
Have a shiny red button next to it labelled "help" that brings up the comments in the config file directly above it.
Have another button (this one blue) at the bottom labelled "done."
I always got lost in httpd.conf till I piped it through grep -v ^#
In the original benchmark you're quoting, the biggest bottleneck was linux on SMP. Linux has gotten a lot better in that respect, but on more modest hardware, Apache (and Linux) have always smoked IIS and windows. On a relatively low end system, Apache on Windows beat IIS too. Of course, nowadays a dual or quad processor webserver with a big hunk of memory isn't as uncommon as it was then. Which comes full circle to speed isn't as important as stability these days.
If a company spent $20,000 on software licenses that depreciates in value over 5 years, they pay taxes on a portion of it. If they use free software and pay $20,000 on consulting fees, they don't pay taxes on a penny of it. Is that clear enough?
Right.
Accounting is the business of obfuscation and there are certain known phraseologies that are generally accepted. Any idiot with a calculator can balance books. Its making them look balanced when their not that makes accounting.
And of course there's the buddy system where certain accounting companies are "in" with the IRS and are almost never audited. The same goes for financials. They are assumed to be competent and low risk. Which is why everyone is dropping Arthur Anderson. It's not that they don't think they can do the job, it's that they know they are much more likely to get audited, because they are no longer in with them, to mangle a pronoun.
Of course part of an accountant's reputation is build on honesty, but a larger part is made on watertight obfuscation.
PHP is a runtime or webserver module -- just the same as ASP. Ruby and Python are the slowest (execution) of the common interpreted languages, but they make up for it in design (more oo features, faster dev times, clarity)
PHP is the fastest, execution wise, unless you start caching and JIT. General usage speed goes something like:
Compiled C or whatever
good JIT JAVA
php
perl
ASP (there are only a few parser constructs to differentiate vbscript/jscript/perlscript --they aren't really different languages)
lisp
JSP
python
bad compiled JAVA
you can get chilisoft for 20 bucks with with a $995 Netra.