If the U.S. is instigating the situation with the rape accusations I don't think they're just doing it to get hold of Assange.
Wikileaks released thousands of diplomatic cables and god knows what else since Assange's arrest and what has anyone heard about their contents? All I hear in the mass media is "blah blah rape blah blah extradition". I think this would pass as a masterful bit of misdirection.
They may very well even not bother extraditing him from Sweden, maybe just make sure he goes down for rape, so the story just fades away and all everyone remembers is a weird rapist.
Could he bypass the need for AC to his computer by using a DC-DC boost convertor directly into a laptop supply, or a DC-DC ATX PSU to a standalone PC and a display panel that has a DC input for an external supply, with the relevant convertor?
Can you back those 90% somehow? I don't believe for a second that it's 90% or even close.
I can smell some kind of tautological No True Scotsman logic where "casual users" are defined as the people of whom 90% will leave due to this disruption.
Taking that logic to it's conclusion, if that building contains any wood they have to factor in the decades it took for those trees to grow. Erecting a building is always a process of assembly of prefabricated elements. You don't sit up some scaffolding baking bricks, laying them as they cool.
Unless you are personally qualified to review the paper, you can only go on the reputation of the reviewers.
Your claim isn't "i've reviewed this paper and here is why it's true", you claim is "this paper has been reviewed by trustworthy and reliable people, that's why it's true".
If that's the case why are they wasting all this time and money supporting IE7 when they could simply stop supporting it and put a message saying "this website will not work with IE7, please upgrade to IE8 or later or one of these other browsers.."? Not that I'm doubting you, it just makes no sense.
Presumably if this has the intended impact of motivating people to upgrade their browser, or even if it just drives them away from the site, as the number of IE7 using customers decreases, the rate of tax will have to increase.
The same amount of effort will be required to make the site IE7 compatible, but there will be less people paying to cover that cost. Eventually I suppose it would come to a point where the tax would need to be so high that everyone will have upgraded or left.
Any individual study can be reviewed at any time. This rarely has any significant impact on the consensus formed by the weight of all other existing related studies. If there are two interpretations of a study based on two different sets of assumptions, the question can be resolved by testing the assumptions. The fact that a single study is ambiguous does nothing to cast doubt on the remaining vast preponderance of scientific studies which unambiguously indicate that climate change is both real and man made.
That this is the consensus is a cold, hard, unambiguous fact. If you want to believe that climate change is not real, or not man-made, the only remaining avenue of rationalisation is that the scientific community a wrong or lying for some reason. This puts climate change deniers on the same ground as creationists.
I can imagine it being very likely that the test would cost less than a day's minimum wage, and in countries with socialised healthcare, it would be free to everyone. This kind of technology is rapidly diminishing in cost.
Slashdot Mirror
If the U.S. is instigating the situation with the rape accusations I don't think they're just doing it to get hold of Assange.
Wikileaks released thousands of diplomatic cables and god knows what else since Assange's arrest and what has anyone heard about their contents? All I hear in the mass media is "blah blah rape blah blah extradition". I think this would pass as a masterful bit of misdirection.
They may very well even not bother extraditing him from Sweden, maybe just make sure he goes down for rape, so the story just fades away and all everyone remembers is a weird rapist.
the time to go from page to page is too long
What are you, johnny five? :p
Could he bypass the need for AC to his computer by using a DC-DC boost convertor directly into a laptop supply, or a DC-DC ATX PSU to a standalone PC and a display panel that has a DC input for an external supply, with the relevant convertor?
Re-read this thread and try to comprehend my post properly. I'm not the OP and I'm agreeing with you. Oh dear indeed.
Can you back those 90% somehow? I don't believe for a second that it's 90% or even close.
I can smell some kind of tautological No True Scotsman logic where "casual users" are defined as the people of whom 90% will leave due to this disruption.
*crickets chirping*
That is like saying that if I drop my credit card in the street I have "published" its details for everyone to see due to my own carelessness.
Yes, that's precisely what you've done.
"just copying" information is so fucking harmless
Correct. It's what's done with the information afterwards that inflicts the harm.
Yeah, but does he know the Mayor of Boston, and does he "wwebsite as on the internet"?
Taking that logic to it's conclusion, if that building contains any wood they have to factor in the decades it took for those trees to grow. Erecting a building is always a process of assembly of prefabricated elements. You don't sit up some scaffolding baking bricks, laying them as they cool.
You haven't looked very hard have you? It's almost as if you don't want to see a refutation. Google, 5 minutes. You're welcome.
Unless you are personally qualified to review the paper, you can only go on the reputation of the reviewers.
Your claim isn't "i've reviewed this paper and here is why it's true", you claim is "this paper has been reviewed by trustworthy and reliable people, that's why it's true".
The counter-argument that Bentham have a dubious reputation is perfectly valid in this case. Bentham have dropped the journal that paper was published in, and have a reputation for recruinting reviewers via the medium of indiscrimate spam emails.
There are two versions - speed optimised @2ghz and power optimised @800Mhz to ~1GHz. Speed optimised draws 1.9W and power optimised draws 0.5W.
That moron would be you it seems...
Wow, that unprovoked hostility came right out of leftfield at the end there. I imagine you're not that unneccesarily rude to people face to face.
If that's the case why are they wasting all this time and money supporting IE7 when they could simply stop supporting it and put a message saying "this website will not work with IE7, please upgrade to IE8 or later or one of these other browsers.."? Not that I'm doubting you, it just makes no sense.
The same amount of effort will be required to make the site IE7 compatible, but there will be less people paying to cover that cost. Eventually I suppose it would come to a point where the tax would need to be so high that everyone will have upgraded or left.
Any individual study can be reviewed at any time. This rarely has any significant impact on the consensus formed by the weight of all other existing related studies. If there are two interpretations of a study based on two different sets of assumptions, the question can be resolved by testing the assumptions. The fact that a single study is ambiguous does nothing to cast doubt on the remaining vast preponderance of scientific studies which unambiguously indicate that climate change is both real and man made.
'Climate Change' is a done deal
The scientific community has overwhelmingly agreed that Climate Change is occuring, and that there is a greater than 90% chance it is man-made.
That this is the consensus is a cold, hard, unambiguous fact. If you want to believe that climate change is not real, or not man-made, the only remaining avenue of rationalisation is that the scientific community a wrong or lying for some reason. This puts climate change deniers on the same ground as creationists.
If internet porn has taught me anything, and it has, it's that you don't need money to negotiate grades with your college professor.
I accidentally the whole meebo bar
thankyou, you don't know how difficult it was to resist replying to myself.
that's the same combination i have on my luggage!
and thus a meme was born
It's very likely that you CRT can be serviced/repaired. It's probably just an aged capacitor.
Scald
I think dousing them with boiling water is a bit of an overreaction :p
I can imagine it being very likely that the test would cost less than a day's minimum wage, and in countries with socialised healthcare, it would be free to everyone. This kind of technology is rapidly diminishing in cost.
fucked up and childish
you did play carmegeddon didn't you?