wow, I have not seen this yet. I guess I just got lucky and the courts were sick of me making them jump through hoops for what would have ammounted to a 200 dollar ticket
as for your point about the radar malfunctioning,I do believe you are right, and in that case the evidence would still be admissible becuase the cop was acting in good faith
I was pulled over doing 52 in a 45. the problem was there was no posted speed limit (the sign was covered with burlap, road work was starting within a day or 2) In NY, if there is no posted speed limit, the speed limit is 55, so I was not speeding per the law. After the fact, they found a dime bag in my car (dumb friend, fell out of his pocket onto my back seat)
It took me 6 months of going to court but after proving that the speed limit sign was obscured (by the town) I got the initial contact thrown out. And because the cop had no right to pull me over, he had no right to search my car, therefore the possession charge was also thrown out
(legally) found the site, any further evidence should be tossed out of court.
for example, you get pulled over for speeding, but you were not speeding and can prove it, cops find a bag of weed on you. that gets tossed out as soon as you prove you were not speeding. same thing should apply here
that is the question I am wondering. The cops knew he was here illegally, thats all that should be needed to deport him. period. Why the waste of money and resources on something that should take the department 30 seconds to get immigration to come pick him up??? When I was in german (and i am/look german) I was stopped no less than 10 times in a week for them to check my passport. why is that so hard to do in america???
people have the ability to focus on more than one thing. maintaining our way of life with fuels we know how they work and the infrastructure is in place, while also working on bringing the prices down on renewables.
while legally you might be correct, but logically, its simply wrong.
If I can get something I want, and no one is offering it up to me at a nominal fee, I find nothing wrong with taking a free copy of said item. legally it might be wrong, morally, fuck them for not letting me access something I would gladly pay for if they would let me.
and if the content creator wants to shun an entire region of their content rather than get paid, there is nothing stopping someone from downloading the content, that is not offered legally to them in other ways.
Content owners could have got paid if they didnt do that
Slashdot Mirror
wow, I have not seen this yet. I guess I just got lucky and the courts were sick of me making them jump through hoops for what would have ammounted to a 200 dollar ticket
as for your point about the radar malfunctioning,I do believe you are right, and in that case the evidence would still be admissible becuase the cop was acting in good faith
its happened to me
I was pulled over doing 52 in a 45. the problem was there was no posted speed limit (the sign was covered with burlap, road work was starting within a day or 2) In NY, if there is no posted speed limit, the speed limit is 55, so I was not speeding per the law. After the fact, they found a dime bag in my car (dumb friend, fell out of his pocket onto my back seat)
It took me 6 months of going to court but after proving that the speed limit sign was obscured (by the town) I got the initial contact thrown out. And because the cop had no right to pull me over, he had no right to search my car, therefore the possession charge was also thrown out
(legally) found the site, any further evidence should be tossed out of court.
for example, you get pulled over for speeding, but you were not speeding and can prove it, cops find a bag of weed on you. that gets tossed out as soon as you prove you were not speeding. same thing should apply here
yes, because the democrats have been wonderful at not taking away our rights.....
DEA has "emergency scheduling" powers, its how they went after bath salts and legal marijuana alternatives over the past decade
if the choices are taxes or robbing americans and putting them behind bars, yes
Probably the frothing horde that sends out death threats and threatens to shoot up universities.
as the OP said...which side?
if they do win it will be a sad day for america because of that, as well as the issue you bring forth
i know, I injected 5 joints yesterday, now im gay!
or they could you know, legalize and tax, making money legit instead of stealing it to use against good americans
i didnt say that is what i believe is happening, but i can see it as something that could be going on
doubt that is what he meant, but they could be using the scare tactics to drum up support for this one movie after the fact
correct, i should have clarified as much
dont forget that people generally are not paying full price on that iphone however. if they were forced to, i would wager a lot less iphone ownership
as i said, its up to you how you decide, but the facts remain, there is a creator, in some sense at least
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
i believe in that as well, doesnt mean people can do whatever they want because.... Murca... however
even if you dont believe in a god, there is still a creator, what exactly that is is up to you however
that is the question I am wondering. The cops knew he was here illegally, thats all that should be needed to deport him. period. Why the waste of money and resources on something that should take the department 30 seconds to get immigration to come pick him up??? When I was in german (and i am/look german) I was stopped no less than 10 times in a week for them to check my passport. why is that so hard to do in america???
people have the ability to focus on more than one thing. maintaining our way of life with fuels we know how they work and the infrastructure is in place, while also working on bringing the prices down on renewables.
why does it have to be either or to some people?
lets also ignore the fact that pirates tend to buy more content than non pirates
while legally you might be correct, but logically, its simply wrong.
If I can get something I want, and no one is offering it up to me at a nominal fee, I find nothing wrong with taking a free copy of said item. legally it might be wrong, morally, fuck them for not letting me access something I would gladly pay for if they would let me.
and if the content creator wants to shun an entire region of their content rather than get paid, there is nothing stopping someone from downloading the content, that is not offered legally to them in other ways.
Content owners could have got paid if they didnt do that
in reality, they will do this, and the government will tell them it doesnt go far enough (no matter how far it goes) and take just a little bit more